Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Last Rights

By Mubarak Dahir, AlterNet. Posted January 26, 2006.


It takes a last-ditch plea by a dying woman to get the freeholders of Ocean County to do the right thing.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Mubarak Dahir

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

In the video, Laurel Hester is shown bald from her cancer treatments. She is wearing a simple black shirt with a silver necklace dangling around her neck, and she is seated on the couch in her home. She looks into the camera, and as she speaks, she struggles for breath. Sometimes, she has to use a respirator at her side before she can continue.

The cancer in her lungs is eating away at her life, minute by minute. Doctors have told Hester that she is almost certain to die in the next few months. But Hester is not on film to talk about the cancer cutting her life short. She is there to talk about what will happen, what should happen, when her life is over.

Hester wants her police pension to go to her partner of six years, 49-year-old Stacie Andree. Hester is a lieutenant and a 23-year veteran of the Ocean County Prosecutor's Office. For about a year, Hester has battled with the Ocean County's freeholders to pass a law that would allow her pension to go to her partner after her death. Andree has said that without Hester's $13,000 death benefit, she will not be able to afford to keep the house the two women share in Point Pleasant, New Jersey.

Under New Jersey's Domestic Partnership Act, passed two years ago, counties and cities have the option of extending healthcare benefits and pension benefits to the partners of gay employees, if they so wish.

But for the past year, the Ocean County freeholders didn't so wish. Some local papers quoted freeholders as saying they were opposed to making the change because the Domestic Partnership Act "circumvented the marriage law." Recently, some freeholders added the more socially acceptable, if no more credible, claim that they were worried about the additional cost of adding partner benefits for gay and lesbian couples.

Despite her failing health, Hester continued to go to meetings and make her case. She enlisted the help of Garden State Equality, a New Jersey gay and lesbian rights group, to help make her case and get public awareness about it. There were protests. Some groups threatened a tourist boycott of the seaside county if the freeholders persisted in their stubbornness. But nothing seemed to work.

Even Steven Goldstein of Garden State Equality admitted, "Truth be told, we did lose hope for a reversal in the past couple of weeks. We had applied all the pressure in the world, embarrassing the freeholders as few public servants had ever been embarrassed before in the state of New Jersey, and still they would not budge."

As time passed dangerously by with no change of heart, Hester became too ill to attend freeholder's meetings in person anymore to make her case. As a last resort, Hester had Garden State Equality videotape her last plea. In it, she implored the freeholders to "make a change for good, a change for righteousness."

On January 20, a group of Republican leaders of Ocean County gathered in a closed-session teleconference that included a viewing of Hester's video appeal. The meeting included top Republican leaders in the county, not just the freeholders. Among those present were two Republican state senators.

When they emerged from the conference room, they made an announcement: "The freeholders want to give this lady's companion the benefits that others get," state senator Leonard Connors told the public.

The Republican leaders all refused to give details of what happened in that meeting to cause a change of heart. They had agreed beforehand to keep the proceedings private. It's a fair guess, however, that Hester's appeal made a deep impression. In a statement after the announcement was made, Hester said, "This is one of the happiest days of my life. I feel like David conquering Goliath."

Hesters story of perserverence and love is one that will be remembered long after Laurel Hester is gone.

Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Equal Protection
Posted by: patvic1405 on Jan 27, 2006 9:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story shows exactly why it is so important that gays and lesbians in committed relationships be granted the same rights as married heterosexuals to pension benefits, medical benefits, and especially Social Security (such as it is). My partner and I have been together for 13 years. We don't want to get "married" in the biblical sense. Leave that to the christers who think "marriage" actually means something in a nation where the divorce rate approaches 50%. But we do want to share in the spoils. My partner has never made much money. Her Social Security check will be bare-bones, while mine is over twice as much - and when I die (which could be fairly soon), she will get none of it and all those years I worked and paid will have been for nothing. This is not a big story, like electrion fraud or Abramoff/Plamegate. But it is a story that impacts literally millions of gay Americans unfairly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the Cost argument
Posted by: walstock on Jan 30, 2006 9:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Next time someone poses the specious "cost" argument, please respond that they must therefore be an advocate for divorce, or must discriminate toward single and gay employees and discourage marriage so they can avoid paying benefits to surviving spouses. Not in keeping with conservative values, do you think?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My closest life partner is my daughter
Posted by: metahope on Feb 12, 2006 10:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My daughter and I live together and when I die I want my pension benefits to go to her so she won't have to suffer a hard life. I want my pension benefits to continue until she dies. It isn't fair that just because she is my daughter she is not entitled to survivor benefits. She will be my survivor in every sense of the word. Just because we are not sexual partners is no reason that people shouldn't recognize her importance in my life. I am asexual and I think asexuals should have the right to assign their pension benefits to whomever they wish.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

asdasd
Posted by: corpse on Aug 4, 2006 8:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Replica Watch
Anadrol
Bontril
Dianabol
Dianobol
Didrex
Reductil
Sustanon
Tamiflu
Winstrol
Carisoprodol

http://rolex.zikforum.com |
http://anadrol.zikforum.com |
http://bontril.zikforum.com |
http://dianabol2.zikforum.com |
http://dianobol.zikforum.com |
http://didrex.zikforum.com |
http://reductil.bb-fr.com |
http://sustanon.zikforum.com |
http://tamiflu.zikforum.com |
http://winstrol.zikforum.com |
http://carisoprodol4u.zikforum.com |

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

asd
Posted by: corpse on Aug 7, 2006 9:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]