Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Blacks and the Border

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, AlterNet. Posted January 26, 2006.


Illegal immigration has touched a raw nerve among certain poor black communities.
Advertisement

Recently, near the close of a spirited community forum on black and Latino relations in South Los Angeles, a young black man in the audience stood up and proudly, even defiantly, shouted that he was a member of the Minuteman Project. This is the fringe group that has waged a noisy, gun-toting and headline-grabbing campaign to shut down the Mexican border to illegal immigrants.

GOP conservatives and immigration reformers denounce their borderline-racist rants. But the group's rhetoric didn't faze the young man, nor many other blacks in the audience who nodded in agreement as he launched into a finger-pointing tirade against illegal immigrants whom he claimed "steal jobs from blacks." He punctuated his tirade by loudly announcing that he had taken part in a Minuteman border patrol back in April.

Illegal immigration clearly touched a raw nerve with many blacks in the audience. Nationally, some blacks are unabashed in fingering illegal immigrants (mostly Mexicans, although many are from Canada, Europe and Asia) for the poverty and job dislocation in black communities.

Illegal immigration has also touched a national nerve. According to a Pew Research Center survey in November 2005, more than half of Americans believe that illegal immigration should be a top national policy priority.

The first big warning sign of black frustration with illegal immigration came during 1994's battle over Proposition 187 in California. Whites voted by large margins for the proposition, which denied public services to undocumented immigrants. But nearly fifty percent of blacks also backed the measure.

Republican governor Pete Wilson shamelessly pandered to anti-immigrant hysteria, and he rode it to a reelection victory. Wilson also got nearly 20 percent of the black vote that election (double what Republicans in California typically get from blacks).

Blacks have also given substantial support to anti-bilingual ballot measures in California.

Though there is furious dispute over the economic impact of the estimated 11 million illegal U.S. immigrants on the job market, there is no concrete evidence that employers hire Latinos -- and exclude blacks -- for low-end jobs solely because of their race.

The sea of state and federal anti-discrimination laws and labor code sections explicitly ban employment discrimination.

Despite a recent flurry of lawsuits by blacks against major employers for alleged racial favoritism toward Hispanic workers, companies vehemently deny that they shun blacks, maintaining that blacks just don't apply for these jobs.

These aren't just flimsy excuses for discrimination. Many blacks will no longer work the menial, low-skilled factory, restaurant, and custodial jobs that they filled in decades past. The pay is too low, the work too hard, and the indignities too great. On the other hand, blacks that seek these jobs are often given a quick brush-off by employers. The subtle message is that blacks won't be hired, even if they do apply.

An entire category of jobs at the bottom rung of American industry seems to have been marked "Latino only," further deepening suspicion and resentment among poor blacks that illegal immigration is to blame for their economic misery.

The anti-immigrant sentiment among blacks is not new. A century ago, immigration was a hot-button issue among black leaders. Marcus Garvey, Booker T. Washington, and W.E.B. DuBois railed against Eastern European immigrants that crowded Northern cities. They claimed the new immigrants elbowed blacks out of bottom-rung manufacturing jobs. At times, these leaders, otherwise progressive fighters for civil rights, sounded every bit as hard-line as America's most rabid anti-immigration foes in demanding that the federal government clamp down on immigration.

But then and now, illegal immigration isn't the prime reason that many poor young blacks are on the streets, and why some have turned to gangs, guns, and drug dealing to get ahead. A shrinking economy, failing public schools, savage government cuts to job-training programs, a soaring prison population, and employment discrimination are still the major reasons for the poverty and grim employment prospects in inner-city black neighborhoods.

Civil rights leaders and the Congressional Black Caucus have repeatedly condemned the thinly disguised, race-tinged appeals of the Minuteman Project, Save Our State, and the legions of other anti-immigration fringe groups that have cropped up in nearly every part of the country in recent months. Some openly pitch their anti-immigrant line to blacks.

As the immigration debate heats up in Congress and the states, and with so many young people unemployed (with prison cells staring them in the face), more blacks may find it hard to resist the temptation to join the shout to close down the border.

Digg!

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. He is the author of 'The Crisis in Black and Black' (Middle Passage Press).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
why is it odd that black americans have main stream ideas?
Posted by: lewis_medlock on Jan 27, 2006 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
mr. ofari, you wish all blacks were bob marley hippies.
my black friends ( i work and live in a diverse community) tend to be some of the most socially conservative people I know!
just because your brethren for the most part have jumped on the train that runs opposite to the course you have chosen doesnt give you liberty to bitch about it.
our futures are intertwined mr ofari.
whats good for me is good for you. and if black folks want to oppose illegal migration by foreign nationals in to this country , then they have the right to do so.
Dont purport to speak for all blacks...if you wan tto speak for the hippie bob marley types, but i dont think my neighbors want you speaking for them!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Black Opposition to Immigration
Posted by: FedUp on Jan 27, 2006 9:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is one of the most balanced articles of yours that I've read, and while I can understand Black ooposition to yet another, (in their eyes) group stepping into the "American Dream", and after paying dues, becoming upwardly mobile, and seemingly at their expense, I have to, yet again, ask; where are the Black leaders? Where are the Black investors?
To people outside of your community, it looks as though those that make it, abandon the community to its fate, somehow thinking that the dedicated ones in institutions, trying to help your community get a sense of purpose and direction, can do it alone.
The Black American community is perfectly capable of turning things around. It has the talent, and it can find the resources; both politically, and industrially, but the to say that leadership is lacking, is to be overly courteous.
I can't think of a more diverse people than Latínos; coming from 21 nations, with racial, ethnic, religious, and political differences, but when their paint finally dries, they are going to be a formidable force in this country.
Yes, they're doing the crap jobs, jobs that I for one don't believe Blacks are losing to them.
I also think the Black community should look at the Africans who come to the US with the same work ethic as Latínos. You see them being street vendors, trying their level best to be entrepreneurs, because they understand the evolutionary process of immigration.
Is the Black American community hobbled by anger and its conservatism?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This article poses a vital question
Posted by: boygranddakar on Jan 28, 2006 6:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this article is highly relevant because the situation in Los Angeles is emblematic of the divide-and-conquer strategies of the right, which are ancient yet still highly effective. Why is this? Personally, I blame a combination of the education system (particularly in California, whose public schools are sliding into serious decline) and poor reporting practices - and analysis - of the news media.

Certainly, those who are leaders within African American communities should do their part to reveal the larger strategy behind the anti-immigrant rhetoric targeted at African Americans, but we can't hold them entirely responsible - African American communities are diverse, and it isn't possible to talk of a "Black community" as if there is only one with the same agenda and desires.

FedUp has a point, that wealth, influence, and resources of wealthy African Americans isn't channeling back into communities of African Americans. We're at an historical moment when we have had African Americans as Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State, and even Laura Bush is calling for Condoleeza (whose politics are hardly sympathetic to most African Americans, but still...) to be the next Republican candidate for the presidency. Notable African American celebrities such as P-Diddy and Russell Simmons certainly can't claim that they are being exploited or that they aren't in a position to fund major philanthropy projects. So where's the love?

But the simple fact is that African Americans and Latinos - immigrant or otherwise - shouldn't be at each others' throats in the struggle for a piece of the pie. The situation in LA is worse than Hutchinson portrays it - race-motivated fights are rampant in LA public schools. It's the classic result in a situation of scarcity, and it won't improve until we alleviate the scarcity of living wages, education, living space, and health care. Curtailing immigration isn't the answer to these issues, but the real answer is so large and comprehensive that it can't be implemented immediately. So, the question should be, how do we take the pressure of the situation in the short-term, and come together to bring about the larger solutions in the long-term, without getting red-herringed by racism and anti-immigrant sentiment?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Could we have honest writing?
Posted by: MPJ on Jan 29, 2006 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Two points.

1, Ofari calls the Minutemen a "fringe group."
SNCC and CORE were fringe groups too, as far as segregationists were concerned.
The only reason to call a group "fringe group" is to try and put them down without actually examining their ideas. It's a mere rhetorical trick -- and whenever a writer is reduced to tricks instead of substance, you can bet there is no substance.

2, Ofari also says that "GOP conservatives and immigration reformers denounce their [the Minutemen's] borderline-racist rants."
How many rhetorical tricks can go in one short sentence? At least three, judging by this sample of Ofari's writing.
Working from back to front:
The word "rants" is designed to keep you from reading what the Minutemen say on their own behalf.
The phrase "borderline-racist" -- does Ofari mean to say that the Minutemen are racist or not? Most attacks on the Minutemen say they are white racists, but Ofari can't say that, since he mentions a black Minuteman. Ofari's "borderline" phrase is designed to slip the "racist" implication in without your noticing it.
Finally, Ofari writes that "GOP conservatives and immigration reformers denounce" the Minutemen. But the Minutemen are immigration reformers, and "GOP conservatives" takes in a lot of territory. Actually, it's probably impossible to be against the Minutemen and also be a conservative, because the Minutemen just want enforcement of the laws against illegal immigration. It's the Minutemen who are the conservatives here; the people Ofari calls "conservatives" want the laws changed, to make illegal immigration easier.

Could Ofari please make his comments more honest?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Does anybody still believe in solidarity with migrants?
Posted by: Guillermo on Jan 29, 2006 6:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author of the article should write about the need for solidarity with hard working people that go across mountains, deserts and seas, just to look for a job. Mexicans and Central Americans -salvadoreans, guatemaleans or hondureans- who leave their towns or cities want to have an opportuniy for a better life. The U.S. needs this workers and it is time to set up an international agreement to benefit both the U.S economy and the southern neighbors. Is anybody opposed to share progress with these peoples? Do not get confused. It is all about people.
Guillermo Garcia
Mexico City

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mpj said a mouthful
Posted by: dlf on Jan 29, 2006 8:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amen! This whole argument from the left side of the isle has thus far been totally disingenuous. They have thwarted any conversation on the subject because, if one is against ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION it is synonymous with racism. One would be hard pressed to describe me as right-wing but I understand when an issue is against my self interest. If progressives want Republicans to vote in their own self interest on economic issues, why don't they want Blacks to? It is not in the interest of Black Americans to have a real wage loss of 15% especially when our unemployment figures have long held in the double digits. Asking lower end American workers to compete for jobs with people who are trying to avoid detection therefore are unwilling or unable to come forward when on jobs that violate labor standards and laws, puts them in the same circumstance as an illegal immigrant. The Left has not offered any viable solution to the problem, and in fact wants to exacerbate it. In the meantime they talk about how Bush hates the poor but they support policies that cripple the poor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not a racial issue.
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jan 30, 2006 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our country has a significantly larger population of poor/working poor citizens than any study/publication/media outlet/think tank has mentioned or willing to admit and is growing at a phenomenal rate. Adding tens of millions (the numbers I read are more like 30 million, not 11 million and that's probably low) of largely poor, uneducated , english illiterate and unskilled people to the problem qualifies it as a crisis and a big one at that.

Undocumented migrants and their dependents pay no taxes (other than sales), are exploited with below market wages & slum housing, are an expensive additional burden upon our schools and social support infrastructure and are an easy target to be exploited by organized criminals. Illegals from Mexico export so much cash that it is a larger part of the Mexican economy than the Oil Industry.

Meanwhile governments from the Federal to local have to spend countless dollars to provide services and bear the costs associated with their being here. That means: 1)- less money for US citizens in need 2)- tax increases 3)- decreased services for all 4)- some combination of 1,2 & 3.

Trade agreements made in the last 20 years have opened the US economy to a flood of cheap imported products that have largely gutted the industrial base of our nation. The net result is the loss of 10's of millions of living wage jobs in our country. Our schools in the aggregate are in serious trouble and we have a huge mass of poorly educated americans with few marketable job skills. How can we rectify this situation while absorbing uncounted migrants that consume billions of tax dollars in services while paying almost nothing in taxes and depressing wages at the bottom end of the job market?

Both the Dems and G.O.P. have pandered to the lobby for these groups as they are seeking political advantage. The citizens have been sold down the river by both parties, both of which only seek to attain or keep power.

Meanwhile, citizens at or near the bottom are pinched ever harder from both sides. We simply cannot afford this tidal wave of illegal migration on a sustained basis unless we desire to become a 3rd world toilet like the countries many of these illegals come from. The issue is basic survival for poor, working poor and working class people. The lower middle class is just starting to feel the pinch and is just starting to wake up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I support the Minutemen and I am a hardcore leftist
Posted by: cry0fan on Jan 30, 2006 11:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
mass immigration from 3rd world countries like Mexico and central american countries is driving down blue collar wages for American citizens. If you support mass immigration in any form, then you are a traitor to your fellow american citizens. If you do not stand with your fellow Americans, then you stand with the neoliberal elite who are using racial guilt and identity politics propaganda to support mass immigrations and the globalization rat race.

I support the Minutemen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's talk.......
Posted by: FedUp on Jan 30, 2006 3:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
history.
In the history of immigration to US, do those of you that are hand-wringing about the "hordes" of illegals crossing the borders, think that there was a time when the government of the US was actively courting an immigartion "wave", or did the pattern of immigration take on a life of its own, predicated by events in other parts of the world?
One third of Norway's population came to the US, due to the difficulties they faced at home.
A famine in Ireland, coupled with harsh treatment at the hands of the English.
Famine and misery in Eastern Europe.
A lack of opportunities in Southern Europe.
Czarist pogroms against Ashkenazi Jews.
Wars in Armenia and Georgia.
The list goes on.....
Did the people from these regions immigrate at the American government's invitation, or did one relative send for another, and another, and so forth. it was the latter.
These waves of immigration, of which all of you are beneficiaries, were not part of a government sponsored action.
Ports of entry to the US were flooded by immigration, and the cities that hosted your forefathers, were soon surrounded by slums where your grandparents settled, until they transitioned onto another rung of life in this, a different country.
They all discovered their niches, despite the contempt they received from groups that had preceeded them, and ultimately prospered.
You may try to deny this right of passage to Latin Americans, but ultimately, you'll fail. You'll make life hellish for them, but nonetheless, they're here to stay.
Get with it, and improve your own lot, but don't blame them for wanting want your grandparents gained for you.
Look at the histories of New York, Boston, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Chicago and New Orleans, and it reads like a whose-who of immigrant thugs, thieves, and gangs.
Your grandparents were over-taxing the hospitals and prisons, to the that people of their generation, with a sense of entitlement to "America" were outraged.
Despite all of that, the country prospered.
So, while the blame-game is as old as the nation, it doesn't make Latinos any less eligible for the "American Dream" than your forefathers.
And please, don't drag out that time-worn, worthless; "But they're walking across our border!" sentence. Your grandparents would have done the same to escape the misery they faced back "home".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Let's talk....... Posted by: dlf
» RE: Let's talk....... Posted by: FedUp
» RE: Let's talk....... Posted by: dlf
» RE: Let's talk....... Posted by: Duende
» RE: Let's talk....... Posted by: FedUp
» RE: Let's talk....... Posted by: Duende
» RE: Let's talk....... Posted by: iamanimal
easy
Posted by: ghettosteak on Feb 1, 2006 3:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that your article is nicely written and has some insightful information. However, this will perhaps be seen merely as an effort to shape opinions for political partisanship seeing that you have left out other observations.

A vast majority of Americans are concerned with border control, including the Minuteman Project, that are not racist. Labeling them racist and connecting them to Republicans is foolish (because you discredit yourself). When you bring people together who have a common goal, you cannot grab one individual and paint the whole group as is so popular these days. This kid was "defiant" because he knew the assertion was BS. You just met one of tomorrow's black leaders. Be proud, or be outmoded. The Minuteman Project was activism aimed at getting the current administration, their "bigot" buddies, to do something they were not inclined to do. Now, either the Minutemen are bigots and the Republicans are not or the Republicans are bigots and the Minutemen are not.

Another reason black Americans disagree with immigration is because Latinos are now the largest minority in the country. Since parties within our government have saw fit to divide the vote along racial lines (a nasty game they play), it is indeed possible that the black vote could be marginalized if these nasty habits continue.

America is more educated, less gullible, and these kids have heart. Leaders do "cool" when it isn’t "cool".

That aside, it is evident that the need for border control is more than "bigotry". This push for immigration is the result of a new world we find ourselves in. Seeing that our military, our negotiations, and our politics cannot change this it is wishful thinking on the behalf of many writers to think that these old tactics will work without better understanding of the world around them.

Deciding to turn the border issue into a racial issue is more of the same. It has hurt this government in the past it will hurt it now. America NEEDS the Latino. The conservatives are split on it, the liberals are using it to garter Latino vote for next election. Bush just reiterated a commitment to them, so we will se what the Republicans do. But the need for border control will NOT go away. We MUST control our border. There ARE people willing to die to kill Americans. They wont ask what color you are.

Nice try.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

About The Last Immigrant Wave
Posted by: dlf on Feb 1, 2006 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I posted this as a response to Fedup but I don't want it buried, so I am making it a seperate post as well.

Yeah now here are some facts. Most notable Asians received 80% of all government minority set aside contracts. I challenge you to find small business owned by Asians that are hiring Blacks. I also challenge you to find small businesses owned by Hispanics that are hiring Blacks? If small business is driving the economy and these people have expressed their preference for hiring from their community how does that help Blacks? For every dollar earned by a Jewish person, that dollar touches 12 to 18 Jewish hands before it leaves their community. For every dollar earned by a black person it leaves the community soon as he or she earns it. In 1860, 98% of all Blacks in America worked for White people. In 2001, 98% of all Blacks in America still work for white people You speak of xenophobes you need to examine more closely who is pushing whom out. Your sentiment is duly noted, but I was there in the 60's when this One World vision popped up, and those who expressed it then, are largely a part of the group doing the oppressing now. They do this as members of the middle-class who make the distinction of saying, "Hispanics work so hard" which, can be interpreted as no one else does. Or as corporate lackeys who watch the bottom line, and help create policy, then lobby to ensure the policy is favorable to them, rather than their employees where ever they may be. If you want to talk about history you can start by learning about how unions excluded Blacks, and how those immigrants you and others so often mention as the last wave, were part of those who were doing the excluding. This conversation isn't new it is only new to you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I like the left because of the honest debate. There are exceptions.
Posted by: YogiBear on Feb 1, 2006 11:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there is no concrete evidence that employers hire Latinos -- and exclude blacks -- for low-end jobs solely because of their race.

Nice turn of the terms. You go from "illegal immigrants" to "Latinos." There's a world of difference between the types of jobs available to undocumented workers and the types available to the rest of us. Anyone who believes that illegal immigrants aren't being offered jobs that aren't available for legal citizens needs to get his head checked.

If all employers were required to pay minimum wage and follow OSHA and labor laws, there would be no suction from US businesses to draw in illegals. They'd want to come anyways, but no one here would be facilitating it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The saddest part about victims
Posted by: iamanimal on Mar 25, 2006 12:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is that they too often become the victimizers. Yes, African Americans have been victims in this country, but why oh why would we even think to scapegoat Hispanics? Are we that eager to see some group being kicked more than ours? Please. If anyone should know how xenophobia, white supremacy, fear, hate etc. operates - it should be us. When I hear about tough legislation against migrant workers - thoughts of the fugitive slave act and other so called laws pop into my mind. Forgive me if I have no trust in the human animal, but I know that we can be selfish, violent disgusting creatures and our laws are filled with flaws. So as far as Hispanics breaking the law to come here - well, the so called laws mean little to me in a country where the true founders have had no say in creating them.

That said, black America, you are supposed to be the moral conscious of this nation by virtue of the unique perspective you have. Not too long ago, your forefathers were "breaking the law" by learning how to read, by drinking out of white water fountains, by demanding human rights. Now here we are scape goating Hispanics for our problems? The audacity!

No American, black or white, should have the audacity to blame hispanics or any other group for their failures. Take personal responsibility. Why should you feel threatened by another human being trying to feed their families. Regardless of your race, stay your butt in school, study hard, avoid crime, unite with your brothers and sisters - then you wouldn't be in such a vulnerable place that you have to scrape the bottom of America's job barrel.

Humans, when will we ever learn....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

asdasda
Posted by: corpse on Aug 7, 2006 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]