Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Reproductive Regression

By Carole Joffe, TomPaine.com. Posted January 24, 2006.


The procedure is still legal. So why are dangerous illegal abortions on the rise?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Carole Joffe

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

"Most commonly, they ingest a whole bottle of quinine pills, with castor oil…we try to get them to the ER before their cardiac rhythm is interrupted…Sometimes they douche with very caustic products like bleach. We had a patient, a teen, who burned herself so badly with bleach that we couldn't even examine her, her vaginal tissue was so painful…."

"Our local hospital tells me they see 12-20 patients per year, who have already self-induced or had illegal abortions. Some make it, some don't. They are underage or poor women mostly, and a few daughters of pro-life families…"

If you assume the quotes above come from a veteran of the abortion rights movement, talking about the "bad old days" before Roe v. Wade, when desperate women suffered death and injuries because abortion was illegal, you'd be partly right. The speaker is a longtime worker in reproductive health, whose involvement with abortion started before Roe. But the situations she describes are occurring now. 

Jen (not her real name) is administrator of a women's health clinic in the South that provides abortions. She has noted with alarm the recent rise in illegal abortion in her community. For some of the women she sees -- after their initial attempts at abortion fail -- whether Roe v. Wade is technically still the law of the land is beside the point. The combination of the procedure's cost, the numerous regulations that her state imposes and the stigma surrounding abortion is leading a growing number of women to choose self-abortion or an untrained practitioner over legal abortion. Finding accurate data about the number of cases is almost impossible.

However, Jen's abortion-providing colleagues in other parts of the country, who communicate their experiences through a listserv, share her observation of a recent perceptible rise in illegal abortion in their clinics as well. Indeed, in another eerie echo from the pre-Roe era, the increase in illegal abortion in Jen's area is so significant that a doctor from the hospital mentioned above contacted her. He asked for her help in setting up a special ward for the treatment of illegal abortions when Roe is overturned, because he knows the caseload will mushroom then. "He didn't say 'if' -- he said 'when,'" Jen said. "Chills ran down my spine."

Why is all this happening when abortion is still legal?  Though the cost of abortion has remained remarkably flat since Roe -- the cost of a first-trimester abortion at Jen's clinic is $380, actually less than it was 20 years ago, adjusting for inflation -- it's still too much for a woman who, as she puts it, "is on assistance, has two or three kids already and has no money whatsoever."  Teenagers in the state where Jen works also need parental consent before they can have an abortion. And for many teens and adult women alike, the overwhelming culture of shame that hovers around abortion prevents many from going to a clinic.

The physical tragedies we are witnessing due to the return of illegal abortion are compounded by the social ones. Recently, two teenage couples, one in Michigan and the other in Texas, faced unwanted pregnancies. Both states have parental consent provisions; in both cases, the young couples received misleading information (in one instance from an anti-abortion "Crisis Pregnancy Center;" in the other, from a private physician's office) about how to obtain a legal abortion. In Michigan, the young man, with his girlfriend's approval, hit her abdomen repeatedly with a baseball bat until she miscarried; in Texas, again with the girlfriend's consent, the male stomped on his girlfriend's belly, producing a stillbirth of twins. Both young men were arrested, and the Texan, Geraldo Flores, is now serving a life sentence for fetal homicide.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Carole Joffe is professor of sociology at the University of California-Davis, and a senior fellow at the Longview Institute.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I can hardly wait...
Posted by: Nigelthebrit on Jan 24, 2006 2:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...for the almost inevitable day after Roe is annulled, when some Progressive Website does a feature (in full colour) of a (very attractive) female Secretary to some right-wing Congressional/ pseudo-clerical Mullah going on a (very discreet) weekend in London, "doing" the usual tourist sites...Buckingham Palace...the National Gallery...Westminster Abbey...the Natural History Museum.

Oh, and I almost forgot - a family planning clinic in Harley Street!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have the chills
Posted by: geming on Jan 24, 2006 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is really scary. Combined with the article on having more than one abortion, it really hits home how on a policy level (both written and in public practice), in a very violent, forced way, I am not considered autonomous, my wellbeing, health, future are not important, and there is so much work to be done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I have the chills Posted by: sln70
The pharmacists
Posted by: Samantha Vimes on Jan 24, 2006 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With their "moral objections" stretching to normal birth control pills, I have to wonder-- what the hell are they doing in the business?
Because female hormones are used to treat a wide range of problems from serious PMS, to ovarian cysts, not just for birth control. So obviously, these pharmacists have no interest in the health and wellbeing of females.
They probably have all the ethics of the pharmacist who was watering down chemotherapy and pocketing the money he saved. You can't be a health professional and be anti-health!
They can preserve their "morals" by getting a new career.
Would anyone support the "morality" of a white sumpremacy church member who was a fireman who refused to put out the fire in a synagogue or give CPR to a black man? Of course not. So why is it that woman's health is less important than a pharmacist's religious views?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The pharmacists Posted by: deha
» RE: The pharmacists Posted by: beemadj
» Hippocratic Oath? Posted by: benzene
» RE: Hippocratic Oath? Posted by: Shehova
» RE: The pharmacists Posted by: judithkrain
» RE: The pharmacists Posted by: judithkrain
It is getting scary for girls
Posted by: pawprints on Jan 24, 2006 9:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There has been so much organized publicity demonizing simple abortions that young girls are growing up with no sense of options or solutions to an unwanted pregnancy. Churches are especially active in closing the door. A school bus passed me on the road, and the back seat was full of 12 yr old girls waving red 'Stop Abortion Now' signs. They looked at me hopefully and I repeatedly shook my head, No. And I wanted to say," Keep Abortion available and medically safe, you may need one sooner than you think."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It is getting scary for girls Posted by: judithkrain
This article makes me sick.
Posted by: Lizmv on Jan 24, 2006 11:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was in high school when Roe v Wade made abortion legal in New Jersey. I had a school friend who died of a botched do-it-yourself abortion. I also had an abortion at 17. But mine was legal as I lived close enough to New York City, where my mother's ob-gyn worked at a clinic.( Back then my boyfriend couldn't even buy condoms at the local drugstore. ) The doctor was a kind and gentle man who had had to clean up too many messes caused by the lack of safe, legal abortions. He perfered to delivery babies but felt it his duty to provide appropriate MEDICAL CARE to all his patients.
I never though we would return to those days.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This article makes me sick. Posted by: judithkrain
Where is common sense?
Posted by: deeannef on Jan 24, 2006 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This whole abortion arguement would be moot, if a little common sense was used. If the person could use unrestricted birth control, there would be no need for an abortion. DUH! But then again to the Religious Reich says you can't use birth control. I often wonder if they have heard of the cliche' "which came first the chicken or the egg?" I wish the Reich would mind their own business and keep out of mine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» that's a start... Posted by: sln70
» RE: that's a start... Posted by: Gma1
» RE: Where is common sense? Posted by: judithkrain
» RE: Where is common sense? Posted by: mkelley
» RE: Where is common sense? Posted by: deeannef
» RE: Where is common sense? Posted by: redjenny
» RE: Where is common sense? Posted by: davidt
Hysteria from Roe vs. Wade Stalinists???
Posted by: CatDad on Jan 24, 2006 11:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some in the pro-choice movement are starting to sense that progressives are realizing that Roe v. Wade has done massive structural damage to the progressive cause. The Democratic Party has totally sold out on economic issues and adherence to upholding this decision is the one single issue that the party actually has a consistent policy on....and that most Democrats actually have a spine when it comes to upholding it. Yet, Roe v. Wade has been the great enabler for the GOP....enabling them to re-define many elections away from economic issues to “moral” issues like abortion so they can distract attention away from their real plutocratic goals (namely, that they don’t give a flying f*ck about the working classes/poor - other than the 15 seconds that they are in the voting both).

I (and other progressives) are starting to question the very high price of keeping abortion legal in every square inch of this nation, especially in places like Alabama/Mississippi where it probably isn’t wanted, and ceding most of our core economic/social justice issues in the process. Has it been worth it? Have two decades of lost elections and the crushing of unions/the working classes been worth the price so that women in such places can have an abortion?

This article is the second fearful article to appear in as many weeks about how horrible the world would be without Roe v. Wade. The Roe v. Wade absolutists are starting to co-opt the same fear strategies as the Right. I’m not buying it. Lets’ overturn Roe v. Wade! Let’s take this golden baseball bat of a wedge issue way from the cesspool/corrupt “culture of life” Republicans....Throw the issue back to the states....(most would re-legalize the procedure right away)....Let the Repugs have to face the wrath of women voters in their district instead of having their current free-ride under Roe v. Wade....screaming/whining “culture of life” every election cycle then doing nothing to overturn their golden meal ticket.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bad attitudes...
Posted by: morticia on Jan 24, 2006 11:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've determined that there are three distinctive prevailing attitudes among anti-choicers when it comes to the reality of the dangers to women of illegal abortion. Either:

1.) They're ignorant of how it was when abortion was illegal, believing abortion was invented in 1973, or...

2.) They buy into historical revisionism, which says all those stories about coat hangers and raging infections and bleeding to death never happened, are mere propaganda, or weren't nearly as common as we say they were, or...

3.) They know how bad it was, and think the baby-murdering sluts deserved what they got.

Some of the Number Ones are possibly educable. The Number Twos at least have some sort of conscience--the idea of women and girls being met by strange men, blindfolded, poked with an umbrella spine or a catheter by a motorcycle mechanic or a hairdresser on a kitchen table or car seat actually does bother them, so they "deny" it. There's nothing you can do about the Number Threes. They're the full-on misogynists, an ugly breed who've been with us since the beginning of time and will always be with us. And not all of them are men.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ending Roe
Posted by: judithkrain on Jan 24, 2006 5:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's not a good solution. We need legislation to outlaw masturbation for men. They destroy life every time they masturbate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: nding Roe Posted by: Robba29
» RE: nding Roe Posted by: davidt
Roe vs Wade is a never-ending battle...
Posted by: uncleboko on Jan 25, 2006 4:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Roe vs Wade is a never-ending battle... It will be fought again and again. However I was cheered just today to drive down a street in metropolitan Fuzhou, China and see (on a hospital wall) a truly massive full-color billboard showing a smiling young woman with an attentive white-coated doctor in attendance.
The caption read (approximately - and in letters fully six feet high): Let us terminate your unwanted pregnancy! It's cheap! it's painless! It's safe - and it's easy! No overnight stay necessary!
I was the only person who batted an eyelid at that in a very busy shopping center.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The double standards on abortion
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 25, 2006 2:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever notice that in countries like China and India, abortion is made mandatory for population control or because some old backwards tradition of killing a baby if it's a girl but you don't see the same "pro-life" people fighting where it counts? In fact, I was watching at my friends house an Asian tele-series where abortions are easily used by criminals against innocent women and after writing a challenging letter to the 700 club located nearby, here's a nasty reply I got:

Dear Mr. ... ,

It is not our business to actually stop people over there from having abortions there as they see fit because we like it if they control their population. However, in this country, for women to be given inalienable rights to carry out an abortion was itself a grave mistake and if God doesn't punish these evil women who kill babies and/or support babies, it is up to us to fight for bringing our justice to them no matter what. There is no excuse whatsoever for women to kill babies before they're born, period.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Up in the rural north, scare tactics are used more often
Posted by: SDres11 on Jan 27, 2006 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can tell you that for women who make it to an abortion clinic especially if you're in my state of South Dakota, fear tactics are pretty much the norm. To begin with, rarely is a woman who comes to the clinic well-off. My niece who went to test the clinic out there to see what's all the fuss about told me that they gun you with so many questions about insurance and income and if you don't look like you're well off, they'll go through your employer to give the current salary and work stats. As most employers make it a habit of lying about their employees being lazy and inefficient, you can see where it goes from there. And yes, pharmacists being allowed to go personal on birth control pills isn't helping any. Might as well get them from other countries. May want to smuggle them though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More on the scare tactics
Posted by: SDres11 on Jan 27, 2006 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also, forgot that it's not uncommon to provide fake abortion clinics in the newspaper and phone directories. Women who need an abortion will often fall for them only to be met with a scare tactic video framed in a way that makes abortion look scary as hell and has been posted in another article, these phonies are well funded by the feds and state governments. Talk about tearing down a good country and turning it into a NAZI regime to the levels which not even Adolf Hitler could dream of.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternatives
Posted by: pomelight on Jan 30, 2006 11:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course it is important to continue to fight to support Roe as best as possible. But with the current climate it might make some sense to consider other options, with the main goal of keeping women safe and providing care, regardless of her economic disadvantages, and regardless of the law. It's not a good idea to get backed into a corner on one front and not have an alternate route to take.

We are not in the same position as we were 30 years ago. There are ways of providing education and assistance that are cheap, easily accesible, and relatively low-risk.

Even in states with medical marijuana laws, it's still considered a federal offense. But that does not prevent people from helping those who need it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop the Reich-Wing Hypocrisy!
Posted by: davidt on Feb 1, 2006 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A note to the Religious Reich:

I think part of the nomination process for all male GOPers entering national politics should include this questionnaire:

Do you now or have you ever masturbated? Yes No

How many times during your lifetime have you
masturbated? Enter Number Here ________


Did you ever consider that while you were satisfying
your base lust you were violating the Biblical law that
states: "Thou shalt not spill thy seed on the ground"?

Yes No

Did you ever consider the "abortion implications" of
this particular unsavory habit? Yes No

Do you think that any members of the Christian
Coalition have ever masturbated? Yes No

How can you justify your qualification for public office?

I think the inclusion of this questionnaire will eliminate
the population of jerk-offs in DC.

Since we all now that Dems are inveterate masturbators
there is no need to supply this information from them

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stupid people don't deserve rights
Posted by: Tara1978 on Mar 4, 2006 5:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it that we feel sorry for these women? Most of the women doing these dangerous abortion techniques are not victims of rape or incest. These are dumb women that don't know when to close their legs. Rich, poor, black , white -- I don't care. I will not support public funding that encourages skanks to continue being skanks. Guess what? I'm poor, too. I know that I can't support a child, therefore, I will not risk bringing one into the world. What's wrong with these women? I will support public funding to purchase chastity belts for these idiot women. They don't deserve to have the privilege of child-bearing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]