Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trouble in Cubicle Nation

By Joe Robinson, AlterNet. Posted January 30, 2006.


While big business racks up historic profits, workplace life is becoming more unbearable for the people who make the products and services.
Advertisement

It was a great year for labor -- if you worked at a call center in India, made your living as a CEO or sold real estate to big-box stores. But deep in Cubicle Nation, the average American worker remained on a fast track to the Industrial Revolution, with soaring workweeks, declining wages, and health, pension and vacation benefits vanishing faster than you can say job security.

Add to the siege outsourcing, cutbacks, the dismantling of ergonomics rules and forced overtime -- all while business is racking up historic profits, the most in 75 years -- and even a nearsighted dingo could see that the trends are unsustainable for families, personal health, company medical plans or an informed and involved citizenry. And completely unnecessary.

As all the productivity research shows, we can get the job done without finishing ourselves off. So let's fire some of the worst habits that got us here and ring in resolutions for a sane workplace in 2006:

Restore the 40-hour workweek. Almost 40 percent of us are working more than 50 hours a week, not exactly what the Fair Labor Standards Act intended when it set the 40-hour workweek in 1938. Chronic 11- and 12-hour days result in lousy productivity, expensive mistakes, burnout, triple the risk of heart attack and quadruple the risk of diabetes -- and leave families without a quorum for dinner. Two-thirds of people who work more than 40 hours a week report being highly stressed. Job stress costs American business more than $300 billion a year.

Establish rules for e-tools. The e-invasion is burying us alive. Human resources departments and individuals need to set tough-love boundaries that would determine message urgency, limit reflexive responses and establish no-send zones (i.e., no forwarding of multiforwarded emails and absolutely no work email at home or on vacation).

Give face time the pink slip. In the knowledge/digital age, it doesn't matter where your body is; what counts is inside your head. More telecommuting and flex schedules could save millions of dollars in office costs and hours reclaimed from gridlock, while providing workers much-needed flexibility, especially for time-crunched mothers.

Legalize vacations. Almost a third of American women and a quarter of men don't get vacation leave anymore because, unlike 96 other countries, the U.S. has no paid-leave law. Those who still get a vacation seldom get to take the whole thing. The average American vacation unit in the travel business is now a long weekend. It's barbaric. And myopic. Studies show that vacations improve performance on the job, not to mention cut the risk of heart disease and cure burnout. More than three-quarters of Americans say they would like to have another week off, which they'd get with the three-week minimum paid-leave law I've proposed.

Provide guaranteed sick leave. No one should have to lose a job because they get ill. But across this land, hardworking people are getting fired simply because their company offers no sick days and they got sick. It's time to join 139 other countries with a minimum sick-leave law and protect those who can't protect themselves. The Healthy Families Act by Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., and Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro, D-Conn., would provide seven days of guaranteed sick leave.


Digg!

Joe Robinson is the author of "Work to Live: The Guide to Getting a Life."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Coming for a while now..
Posted by: navistic50 on Jan 30, 2006 1:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been seeing this pattern emerge for some years now, and questioning the sensibility of what companies are trying to do. What happens when the work force begins to rebell? Will companies clamp down even harder and manipulate the labor pool? How many workers will be blacklisted by management when the employee does not "behave" or put the company first?

Or the real question... when will american citizens wake up to this abuse, this "Industrial Terrorism"? Other than using real guns, many american company managers are using every psychological, emotional, and plain outright bullying tactics to make the employee work harder, while all the while undermining not only the labor base, but the country in general. I have to wonder about these middle managers .. are they really foolish enough to believe this can go on indefinitely? Are they assuming that imported labor is the answer? What will happen when americans can no longer support themselves or their families due to immigrants taking the same job for less money? How will the "middle managers" feel when it's their turn to grovel?

Before this is all over, it is realistic to speculate that american workers will be faced with many hardships and will have to take a decrease in living expense so the companies can grow fatter still. I am curious to see if the average american can see past the lies and deceptions of management, and to deal with the feelings of powerlessness and frustration. The America of the 21st century only vaguely resembles the America I grew up in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Coming for a while now.. Posted by: NYRugby
Tougher since 9/11
Posted by: agfusa on Jan 30, 2006 1:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
9/11 was horrible for the travel industry. Our hours were cut, our raise percentages reduced, and some other benefits taken away. However, since 9/11, business is booming. Our CEO keeps sending out announcements about how good business is. Our stock is $25/share higher than before 9/11. But our raise percentages were never put back to what they were before 9/11. We have 4 categories. A "meet expectations" will get you a whopping 2.5% raise. An "exceeds expectations" will get you 3.5%. Inflation last year was 3.49%. Luckily, I'm an hourly employee. I can actually make more than our salaried managers. All salaried employees in my company have mandatory 50-hour weeks. I'm not sure what happens if you don't meet your 50-hour requirement, but I don't think it's too pleasant. We haven't lost any offices to India yet, but we have opened three in Canada and closed two in the United States in the last five years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tougher since 9/11 Posted by: badkitty53
Inevitable demise
Posted by: sln70 on Jan 30, 2006 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's so obvious what will happen if this trend isn't stopped. People will not be able to buy any of the things they are making/selling/repairing and thus the economy will come to a standstill. The greedier corporate elites get, the less they can sell.

Of course, there's the Chinese market, insatiable, enormous, and growing. Look for revolution and painful readjustment in the Western World while China and India head down the road we've been traveling.

We're just switching places, that's all.

I wonder who our Chairman Mao will be?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

music to my ears!
Posted by: Samantha Vimes on Jan 30, 2006 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I like how the points are made about the overworked people becoming sick and not necessarily more productive. The current business practice of short-term maximum everything is *not* a sound business practice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Imagine vacation time
Posted by: davelwhite on Jan 30, 2006 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for putting these proposals in the simplest terms possible, e.g. "mandatory minimum sick & vacation time." Even Progressives in America so often fall for the notion of a targeted program for "the less fortunate" that makes you fill out a form in triplicate to "deserve" anything (think of family medical leave, which is not only unpaid, but has the government telling you who is important enough to be in your family). And then, of course, the majority get resentful that they weren't included in the narrowly targeted program and go off and vote Republican.

There is a cultural aspect to this too, unfortunately-- although we do need a government program to tell companies they have to give people time, we also need something else. What do people in our culture do when they DO get some time away from work? They get other jobs, they work endlessly on remodeling their houses or other property if they have any, they enroll in endless clubs and groups and classes (even their kids are organized out the wazoo) and they have 60 online friends each of whom they see once every 6 months. And of course we watch too much TV when we finally do sit down and relax.

We can't just blame our bosses for the notion that we need to be busy on structured goal-oriented activities all the time in order to be important. All those kids who don't play outside any more, who trade off between Too Much Video Games and endless scheduled activities, where do you think they got that from? It is possible to enjoy unstructured time with friends, without having a Goal In Mind, but even without our bosses' help we seem to have forgotten that.

dave

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow! An excellent article!
Posted by: zooeyhall on Jan 30, 2006 7:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank God we finally have an article in the progressive media about such a basic meat-and-potatoes issue.

I really wish Progressives would focus more on this issue. It would go a long way to enhancing and expanding our power base. Too often the Progressive media seems to be getting bogged down in trivialities like organic food or GM crops; or such issues as global warming and peak oil. While these issues can be important, the current sorry state of the working-class in the U.S. and the decline of working conditions is something that is up close and personal to any American with a mortage and a family to support.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More jobs needed
Posted by: BeeGee on Jan 30, 2006 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Job development is Job Number 1! Despite the unemployment figures for OH, WV, IN, MI, etc., the fact remains -- if you're an hourly worker, you're disposable. If you're lucky enough to have a $12/hr manufacturing job and you get the flu, your employer can lay you off on your second sick day and have an equally qualified person at your machine the next morning. As long as workers are valued as little as Star Trek expendables, change won't occur. Time to revitalize the unions, I guess.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Outsourcing has been going on glaringly since the 1980s but why did it take
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 30, 2006 7:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
outsourcing calls centers to India to finally look at the issue? Lou Dobbs may have a lot of valid points but like most others who make weak arguments against outsourcing, they seldom address the greater percentage of those who go through the trouble of getting a truly decent education even if that means drowning themselves into debt only to be turned down because somehow they're not "senior" enough or don't have their years of "experience".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And those who do . . .
Posted by: sassicatz on Jan 30, 2006 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
have a good education and experience can't get jobs because theyr'e "overqualified"!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And those who do . . . Posted by: bettsoff
» RE: And those who do . . . Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: And those who do . . . Posted by: janakiblum
JEFFERSON
Posted by: Stano on Jan 30, 2006 9:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's another item that could be added to your list - the reduced sense of space and privacy that these cubicle detention centers and the lauded open office floor plan (that really soared in popularity during the .com boom of the 1990s) offer workers. Combined with the overall rudeness inherent in American society (yak yak yak) and the result is HIGH STRESS. It's gotten so that I have taken work home because I can't concentrate admist all the chatter and management doesn't care (after all, they have offices with doors!) We, the rank and file, can be watched but what about them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Short List of Issues for 2006/8
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jan 30, 2006 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the Democrats would be DEMOCRATS and unafraid to speak out and articulate on issues such as this, the NeoCons will not only be swept out of the White House and Congress-- they will lose control of the G.O.P. as well. By defining real issues the progressives can cut off the G.O.P.'s favorite tactic of setting up straw men for liberals/progressives to trip over during a campaign.

Why should a left centric Democrat care who controls the G.O.P.? Traditional Republicans can and will work more easily and readily with Democrats than the hard core NeoCons that have hijacked the G.O.P.

The time is now to prepare the soil for the 2008 campaign and define and shape the issues for the next 2 elections. GWB, Hastert & Frist have had the reins and the record is not good. Call them on their failures. Define a clear way forward. Tell it like it is.

The genius of Gingrich's 'Contract with America' was to give a unified vision and theme for off-year congressional elections. This gave the voters a clear choice at retail against a then very weak Bill Clinton and Democratic Congress. Learn from the past.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I's worse than that
Posted by: condenser on Jan 30, 2006 10:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On a higher level, it is creating a nation of disinterested sociopaths, in the mold of corporate America. Why are peope so passive when it comes to major issues like the ones in American politics today? Cubicle Nation is the breeding ground for feelings of hoplessness and helplessness. Sitting in every cubicle is a person who is viewed as an expense to be minimized and voice to be marginalized. Who really cares anymore? We accept the notion that we cannot change things and this is paralyzing us as a society. The way to beat cubicle nation is to not be part of cubicle nation, in the same sense that the best way to avoid a problem is not to be part of it.
Trying to get concessions from corporations will not work. The corporate form has overwhelmed us. If we must live with it, then we should be demanding that every living person be and equal owner in it by default and as a birthright.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ENOUGH
Posted by: benzene on Jan 30, 2006 2:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's it, this corporate thing isn't working out, so I guess that the only option I have left is to become a compassionate pimp and feed off of the greed with well-insured whores and fair-trade drugs, fight back illicitly and whatnot.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And a pony.
Posted by: Kneel on Jan 31, 2006 2:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of these seemed so obvious, things we've been trying to get for a long time. (Well, except the Lou Dobbs bit.) What does this add to the discussion? Is there some route suggested to get there?

Great idea -paid parental leave. Great. Vacations. Yeah, yeah. Never heard those before.

You'd almost expect to see "... And I want a pony!" at the end.



The "face time" one certainly doesn't belong. Some people stuck spending their working lives in little apartments, tapping away; others somehow telecommuniting to the assembly line.

But, more importantly, information scientists find that transmission of knowledge isn't all verbal. (Check out Harry Collins' study of the TEA laser in Changing Order).


The only thing this piece offers is the back-pats bit. That should've been the focus. We have this system that rewards neurotics (who will spend all weekend working) and sociopaths (who aren't bothered with the consequences).

A friend was telling me how she works one or two extra hours every night now just to get al the extra work done. It's actually a terrible thing to do to her co-workers, who have families to get home to. Instead of letting the employers see realistically that they need to hire more staff, they can say, "Look at Sally. She manages to get all her work done every day."

Maybe ask such people, "If your wage is X per hour, and you worked Y extra hours last month, that's Z dollars you should have been paid. Now, would you willing to just donate that much money to the company?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Trivialities
Posted by: janakiblum on Feb 1, 2006 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the writer's viewpoint, though, unfortunately the "trivialities" he mentions are part & parcel of the "meat & potatoes" issues. Both stem from a particular way of thinking about the world; that (almost) everyone and everything on earth is expendable in the pursuit of short term gain for the few.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The problem with this article
Posted by: nosylae on Feb 1, 2006 6:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with this article is that it doesn't promote any sort of reform, just a different way of dealing with the rat race you are all stuck in. Instead of demanding "paid vacation leave" and "paid maternity leave" from some company where you are an employee, why not promote the idea of becoming the employer? Instead of complaining about 50+ hour work weeks, why not promote the idea to become financially free so that you can set your own hours?

That is why the richest nation in the world doesn't mandate paid time off - because the entrepreneurial spirit of this country allows you to go after something if you truly want it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Myth fish!!!
Posted by: Slowburn on Feb 4, 2006 6:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read no further if you have been irrevocably indoctrinated by the multinational corporations into believing that you are just another servile automaton. Because I intend to let loose the truth sharks to swim in your head and gobble up all the myth fish.
Myth, that your rights as a human being cease to exist when you walk through the front door.
Myth, that if you do not lick boot in the proper manner you will not be treated the same as those who do.
Myth, you subordinate me superior therefore, me better then you.
And any other little myth fish they have let lose in your head that makes you believe you are subhuman
And undeserving of inalienable rights as a person.
If you have not figured out where I'm going with this then its time to tell you . ORGANIZE, gather with those that like you have got to the point that you do not want to be treated like a subhumans. Get to a local representative union learn strategies to take back you dignity and make your work place better.
Together you can negotiate for better working conditions and yes in the long run it will make your employer stronger. And along with that your jobs will become stronger as well. Because a happy work force is a healthy, efficient, and productive work force. LIVEBETTERWORKUNIONYESUCAN.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Race to the Bottom
Posted by: DrgonzoSB on Feb 4, 2006 7:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These ideas need to be pushed to all working Americans. We're getting hammered out here, working harder and harder for less money, less security; the corporate powers and their Republican friends have succeeded in shifting costs and responsibility from themselves and government to our already sagging shoulders. Yes, this cannot go on without massive social dislocation and upheavel. The problem is that so many working Americans vote for the people that are slamming them. They fall for the "social & moral" issue argument, when in fact that's just a smokescreen for economic rape. We need to revive the American Labor Movement, stop this insane race to the bottom. Profit at any cost is not working.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Workers get what they deserve
Posted by: andyleeparker on Feb 4, 2006 11:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans need to grow up and become adults, rather than clinging to perpetual adolescent dependence on corporate "parents" to give them an allowance for doing their chores. The government wants to "create jobs" to avoid revolution, and they do this with corporate welfare, rewarding those who hire and collect taxes for them, for herding the sheep, as it were. Why are people not taking responsibility for themselves, and starting their own businesses? When enough people dare to become adults and work for themselves, and CHOOSE whether or not to pay taxes, and don't buy unaffordable insurance and therefore drive the corrupt insurance industry out of business, which will force health care costs s back down to a reasonable level, America might be worth living in again. But as long as Americans remain like baby birds waiting in their nests with their mouths open, refusing to take flight or responsibility for themselves, they can hardly whine about the quality of the worms they recieve. Instead of growing up and taking responsibility for themselves, they are allowing themselves to be held hostage by the health care and insurance industries, as well as allowing the government to steal over a third of their wages to pay for their own enslavement. They allow themselves to be degraded, devalued and humiliated by the threat of losing all they've worked for with a single illness. They obviously need someone to tell them what time to get up, what to wear, what hours to work, what to buy, and what to think because they are incapable of the self-discipline required to make these decisions themselves. Yes, greedy predators abound, but no-one can be made a slave unless they place a higher value on simply remaining alive under any conditions and at any cost to others than they place upon freedom, dignity and a life worth living. Apparently, Americans have been willing to trade freedom and dignity for the illusion of security, the ability to buy useless trinkets at Walmart and a spot on the couch in front of the boob tube, which tells them what to buy there. I just can't muster much compassion for them, as my own life has been so adversely affected by their decisions, or should I say, their unwillingness to make any conscious decisions. One cannot be given freedom, one must make a decision to take it, and take the responsibility that comes with it. A sadist can't exist without a masochist---and really, it's debatable which has the most power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Workers get what they deserve Posted by: andyleeparker
maternity
Posted by: mrjones on Feb 4, 2006 11:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the whole maternity leave issue reminds me of how the Carribean sugar cane plantations wouldn't allow their slaves to reproduce since it was much cheaper to import new slaves from Africa....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Trouble in Cubicle Nation
Posted by: t_thyme on Feb 6, 2006 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the article did not cover is the fact that many companies, who are enjoying the vast profits over the backs of their employees, are reducing (or not evening giving):

- a user friendly work space...everyone is in little soundproof boxes...there is less interaction between co-workers, less comradery, sharing of ideas about a particular issue being worked on without getting up and seeking out someone to discuss it with (despite the fact that the issue is on the computer at their desk)

- raises...instead of "bonuses" which do not show up on the employees salary record, thus making them less marketable, denying them a step up in the salary groups and company grading (which would provide additional benefits).

- re-organization of departments without discussing the pros and cons, or requesting input from the people involved in the shuffle

- improved health benefit plans with reasonable deductables (like they were when the plan was first introduced)

- company perks, like the company Christmas Party, family activities, etc

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wish this was up longer...
Posted by: esoder on Feb 8, 2006 2:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...I loved it. But I had to search to find it again. I linked to it on my blog (mindbloggingtypos.blogspot.com) and then wrote the following:

Work for a living?

I've been working in the "technology sector" since shortly after I graduated from college with an English degree. When I got out in '91, my only marketable job skill was ten-key data entry by touch. Five years of college at a prestigious, if contentious, University for a BA, and data entry was my best career option. Anyway - that led to being a system operator, which led to learning networking, and then tech writing, and then IVR programming, and then project management, and then speech recognition. Aong the way, I been employed by some good companies (Birkenstock, SSG) and some bad companies (Fireman's Fund, Eclipse Networks). And since I've spent the last 10 years or so as a consultant, I've worked on site for dozens of other companies. What I've found is that it sucks even working for good companies, and the bad companies aren't much worse.

I went through the dot-com bubble working at various sites in the Silicon Valley, Telecom Alley, and a variety of mini tech boom areas all over the country. What a great time to be in tech! Long hours, but the work was rewarding, and you really felt like your creativity and hard work would lead straight to the good life and not having to work very much. It felt like every hour you put in at the office or working at home at night was going to subtract five hours from the back end of our careers. We would all retire at 35 to manage our personal portfolios on eTrade, book our vacations on Travelocity, collect old computers and Star Wars action figures on eBay, hook up all of our home electronics to our lap top, and then really get in to those extreme sports...

...I remember thinking how cool it was to work at TellMe because they had a big open workplace, arcade games, pool tables, a kitchen with several cafe quality espresso machines, and people zipped around the space on Razor Scooters. If you were one of the first few dozen employees hired, you spent your first day on the job assembling your own desk and building a bunk bed over it. It was expected that you would be sleeping there. So they made it convenient for you to do so. I thought that was the greatest thing ever.

Does anything about this strike you as odd yet? Wouldn't it be nice to maybe go home to your family? Wouldn't it be nice to put in a strong eight hour day and go home to your family without looking like a slacker compared to your co-worker who slept over? Picture where you work. Is there anything appealing about sleeping there instead of at home in your own bed?

At the time, we all thought that putting in the extra time would make us insta-millionaires. Stock prices kept going up and up and up, and even the most ridiculous internet ideas got funded and often went public. Sure, there were Porsche Boxsters in a lot of parking lots - but not many. Just about everyone I worked with at the time is still working. Or at least looking for work...
-------

Everyone that graduates from high school or college should be given a copy of How To Be Idle and Zinn's People's History. They should read it before they enter the work force. And if they choose not to, then they deserve whatever job they take.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

asdasd
Posted by: corpse on Aug 4, 2006 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Replica Watch
Anadrol
Bontril
Dianabol
Dianobol
Didrex
Reductil
Sustanon
Tamiflu
Winstrol
Carisoprodol

http://rolex.zikforum.com |
http://anadrol.zikforum.com |
http://bontril.zikforum.com |
http://dianabol2.zikforum.com |
http://dianobol.zikforum.com |
http://didrex.zikforum.com |
http://reductil.bb-fr.com |
http://sustanon.zikforum.com |
http://tamiflu.zikforum.com |
http://winstrol.zikforum.com |
http://carisoprodol4u.zikforum.com |

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

asd
Posted by: corpse on Aug 7, 2006 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
asdasd
Posted by: seogirl on Aug 8, 2006 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
111111111111
Posted by: extremist on Oct 7, 2006 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
111111111111
Posted by: extremist on Oct 7, 2006 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]