Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Vanquishing the American Dream

By Jim Hightower, Hightower Lowdown. Posted January 24, 2006.


As General Motors shuts down well-paid middle-class jobs, the old slogan 'What's good for G.M. is good for America' no longer applies.
012406_story
Credit: Bob Krist

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Jim Hightower

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

People like Robert Paulk and Jerry Roy are the heart of corporations like General Motors. Paulk, 58, and Roy, 49, are longtime, highly skilled hourly employees who've been working-class proud of being part of GM. Over the years, they've known their share of the hard labor, heavy lifting, and stress that come with being an autoworker, but they've stayed loyal, taken great pride in their work, and kept increasing their skills and productivity, doing their part to help General Motors become the largest car seller in the world -- and helping GM's investors pocket years of profits.

The job has been good to Paulk and Roy, too. Under the contracts negotiated by the United Auto Workers, Paulk, his wife, and their two teenagers have been able to enjoy a slice of middle-class comfort. Likewise, Roy, a third-generation GM worker, has done well enough to afford a modest but pleasant house on a lake near Flint, Mich., where his job is.

The Paulks and Roys represent a common story that can be told by millions of Americans of their generation. It's the story of our country's "social contract" -- an implicit agreement between working stiffs like them and corporations like GM. This is a remarkable success story, embodying our nation's egalitarian ideals and our commitment to the common good. In practice, America's historic social contract has established within our huge, diverse and fragile society something essential: a stable middle class. While the Constitution and Bill of Rights are the legal glue of our nation, this contract is the social glue -- it binds us as one people, giving tangible evidence that "we're all in this together." Those who produced this democratic advance were not the founders back in 1776, but our parents and grandparents -- and doing so did not come easily for them.

In the 1920s and '30s, working families in industry after industry openly rebelled against the rampant corporate greed, workplace abuses and political corruption of the day. As they organized, marched, and held sit-ins and strikes, they were bludgeoned, shot and often killed by corporate bosses, Pinkerton goons, police and even the National Guard. It was a hellacious period of bloody labor war, deep social unrest and spreading political upheaval. Finally, fearing for the very survival of capitalism, corporate chieftains began to signal to union leaders that they were ready to negotiate for labor peace and a new social order.

The ensuing bargain was straightforward: Corporations would get labor, loyalty and productivity in exchange for assuring job and retirement security. From the New Deal until the mid-1980s, unions, corporations and government hammered out a series of explicit agreements, rules and laws that gave legal structure to this implicit contract. The result was a new balance of power that made ordinary people like autoworkers the first decently paid, decently treated working class in the world.

Work was still hard and demanding, but the development of our social contract meant that, for the first time, tens of millions could find the American dream within their reach. By no means would you be a millionaire, but you could buy a modest home, have health care for your family, take a vacation and not have to fear retirement -- in other words, have the work ethic fairly rewarded. Such a contract also enabled working folks like Paulk and Roy to feel positive about America's commitment to the common good, to pride themselves as being a valued part of the economy and the larger community, and to have hope for the next generation. Such feelings are more than touchy-feely niceties -- they determine whether people support the social order. This is why the feelings of workaday folks like Paulk and Roy are a crucial baromenter of America's well-being, and why today's corporate and political elite had better begin tuning in to them. "We're all worried. Everybody is worried," Paulk says of GM's workers. "There are a lot of people that are really mad. They think this is the thing that revolutions are made of."

The thing

What has the majority of America's working families worried, angry and in a mood to revolt is that the Powers That Be have unilaterally decided to walk away from the social contract, and in so doing, to kiss off our country's middle class. The evidence of their abandonment is everywhere:


Digg!

Jim Hightower is the author of "Let's Stop Beating Around the Bush" (Viking Press). He publishes the monthly Hightower Lowdown; for more information about Jim, visit jimhightower.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is a brilliant article.
Posted by: rage on Jan 24, 2006 2:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is all stuff that I've been vaguely aware of, almost like in a dream, so to hear it spelled out so clearly is like a lightbulb going on in my head. You see it all the time. I've only worked at my current employer for a year and a half, and already I've seen three major lay-offs, increased demand and workload, benefits slowly and surely being lowered to nothingness, and yet our company is still, as far as I know, making good profits every year. In the end, it will be their own downfall. It's the inevitable result of certain formulas. Why can't they see this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FINALLY, THE 'R' WORD
Posted by: AJWeishar on Jan 24, 2006 3:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excellent commentary on what is unfolding across the country. Now the notion of a revolution has finally entered the picture. As we have seen with Katrina, there is no Homeland Security, no homeland defense. The irony of the situation is the right to weapons up to .50 cal. Thus we have a well armed revolution by law, concealed and high powered. The country is approaching the breaking point between elite and the common man.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You Say You Want A Revolution?
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jan 24, 2006 4:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Revolution, indeed. Action must be taken now to retake this country from the hideous tidal wave of human shit who are trying to destroy it. The despicable half-wit in the White House, George W. Bush, has said of illegal immagrants, "they're doing the jobs that Americans won't do". Would someone please tell this fucking idiot that they are doing the jobs that Americans CAN'T do because it is no longer possible to survive on the minimum wage!

Every one of us should read the book, "The Jungle" by Upton Sinclair. Written in 1905, it was a fictionalized expose' of the working conditions of Chicago's meat packing plants. Sinclair was one of the most respected investigative journalists of his era. It was he who, in an angry moment, President Teddy Roosevelt was referring to when he coined the term, "muckraker". When he died on November 25, 1968, he and his famous book were all but forgotten - with good reason: The conditions in the American workplace that Sinclair wrote so passionately about had, for the most part, disappeared. Now, over one hundred years later, Corporate America is trying to bring back the slave wage conditions and the inevitable human misery that were common then.

Please purchase this very important book. It's back in print and is essential reading. The deplorable plight of the American worker at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries will return with a vengeance if we let these bastards have their way.

Pray for peace

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You Say You Want A Revolution? Posted by: buffeliscious
» RE: You Say You Want A Revolution? Posted by: FoxintheStars
» Err....you forget to mention. Posted by: ABetterFuture
Jim is brilliant
Posted by: riley on Jan 24, 2006 5:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you want an excellent but easy-to-understand explanation of the entire globalization project, read the second half of his IF GOD HAD WANTED....written before the 2000 elections. It entirely changed my outlook on life. AlterNet should link most of his feature articles from THE HIGHTOWER LOWDOWN. It's an excellent newsletter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gravity
Posted by: Germanicus on Jan 24, 2006 5:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Comrades,

For over 50 years we fought the Red Menace and were told "Capitalism good, Socialism bad." The so-called laws of economics showed that fighting against market forces was like fighting gravity. One cannot even speak about "redistribution of wealth" without being called a commie.

Our version of Capitalism, though, is based on a rather ugly lie which states that in order for a company to remain "healthy", it must continuously expand. If a company is not growing, or even if its growth is "disappointing to the markets", then that is justification for cost-cutting measures (read screwing the workers). What we are now witnessing is simply (he said at the risk of paraphrasing Satan himself, Karl Marx) the logical outcome of Capitalism.

I am not sure I would want to use the "R" word (what with the NSA listening and all), but an over-turning of the current structure would certainly seem desirable.

Vive la Rrr... Republique!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Gravity Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Gravity Posted by: dlf
then they turned out the auto workers and I did not speak out
Posted by: DrXyzzy on Jan 24, 2006 5:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pastor Niemöller has a warning for us all here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Indeed first they came for Posted by: qrswave
"This is the thing that revolutions are made of."
Posted by: eileenflmng on Jan 24, 2006 5:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Greed married to Power is not just deaf it also doesn't care and that too is what revolutions are made from.

If corporate America is a reflection of our society and if government is 'we the people', we the people are the ones who must rise up to change things. No effective change occurs unless it is rooted in the grass roots.

Eisenhower warned America of the danger of wedding the economy to the military but we didn't listen and now the world has tipped over heavy with artillery.

Our schools do not encourage creative thought, only how to take tests and fill in forms; perfect training for a soldier to be.

"We have it in our power to change the world"-Tom Paine

Where will the end of the middle class lead us?
Our choice is revolution or defeat through passivity.

WAWA:
http://www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I pick REVOLUTION Posted by: qrswave
labor unions and the working class
Posted by: jgros on Jan 24, 2006 6:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jim Hightower is right about the labor conracts negotiated between corporations and their workers... but it was and remains a way to undercut the "working class" those who do not have jobs those who are throw away people.. those discriminated against for some reason, those denied a decent edcutin.etc etc.
The deal with the unions was meant to put down the un rest which was class based..
Its time we moved away from the comforting pieces of the past to a clarity about the ways corporate power works and what to do about it..something that Hightower has previusl done well.

jean

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Absolutely Right! Posted by: qrswave
What do we want now?
Posted by: Xjy on Jan 24, 2006 6:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In one sentence Jim H reveals the secret of the "golden age" of US prosperity and as it happens of European etc welfare state prosperity too. That sentence is:

"Finally, fearing for the very survival of capitalism, corporate chieftains began to signal to union leaders that they were ready to negotiate for labor peace and a new social order."

Now we can see that "labor peace" has led us nowhere (except to the peace of the graveyard, as Rousseau put it) and the "new social order" wasn't so new after all, just a temporary concession until the big bourgeoisie (sorry, the Corporate Fat Cats, big capital, Mr Moneybags) felt strong enough and unthreatened enough to roll it all back again.
Given the mounting discontent and rumbling anger of the cheated working class ("middle class" my arse... :-) ) we are in for a period of escalating tensions and conflict, with an accelerating clarity as to the class character of the hostilities. The class struggle is on the agenda again.
So... do we aim for a new rotten compromise with the bosses when they start shitting themselves, or do we aim to break the power they have as a class by removing their control of large-scale manufacturing, services and agricultural production?? This means abolishing the private ownership and control of these sectors. Do we run our society for everyone's benefit as a cooperative social endeavour, or sell our democratic empowerment for higher wages or a mess of health care? In other words, the next time the bosses admit defeat, do we help them back onto their feet and into fighting shape again, or do we put them in the museum once and for all for our kids to marvel at...
It's time we ourselves dictated the terms of any social contracts that are to be negotiated, not the class enemy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What do we want now? Posted by: Coleman
» I vote MUSEUM Posted by: qrswave
The Sad truth
Posted by: zoza on Jan 24, 2006 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Winston Churchill once said that "Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but usually manages to pick himself up, walk around or over it, and carry on." I'm afraid that the sad truth of the matter is the fact that the American people are suffering from such a severe case of somnambulism, that they can't awaken long enough from the stupor that their favorite insipid TV shows have induced, to do anything but sit frozen. I guess maybe they are hoping that maybe all this will someday soon make a great new reality show on FOX starring Sean Hannity.

The only revolution that can occur, when the masses have awoken, is to get rid of every last politician who currently holds office. Then to elect men and women who have genuine compassion and altruism as their campaign promises.

Of course, this will not happen until the citizens are hit upside the head with a frying pan. 9/11 was a 'two by four' and barely gave the US citizens a headache.... they went right back to "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire" and "Survivor" and "CSI-Wherever".

But when they can't afford cable or a gas guzzler... they will wake up! And the indignation will be HORRIFIC!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The best article ever on Alternet
Posted by: zooeyhall on Jan 24, 2006 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a wonderfully incisive article! Thank you, Jim, for once again getting to the heart of the matter in such an eloquent and truthful way.

Alas, however, I fear that the fire that caused the labor reforms of the '30s may not be around anymore. Where I live (Nebraska) it seems that attitudes of the working class are divided between:

1) resignation i.e. "Jesus will provide"

and

2) If you can't beat 'em, join 'em---those of the working class getting screwed who tell themselves "ok, someday somehow I'll hit it big, and then I'LL be the one doing the screwing"

Not very encouraging ingredients for a revolution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» American Dream version 2.6 Posted by: peritonlogon
» RE: American Dream version 2.6 Posted by: redjenny
Just keep consuming and everything will be OK...
Posted by: antiapathy on Jan 24, 2006 8:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What else did we expect when we base our entire economy on crass consumerism? Who cares where our widgets come from, or if their makers were paid a decent wage, or if they are destroying the environment? I'm happy as long as I can get ten for a dollar at the local wal-mart. Why go all the way down to the library when I can just have Amazon ship it to my door?

GM knows that we will continue the American love affair with cars and SUVs for as long as we can successfully invade oil-producing nations, so why bother upholding the social contract? Consumer-citizens are apathetic.
If you want a revolution, we have to hit them on all fronts, and hit them hard:

- Vote out the corrupt politicians of the two corporate parties. all of them. no more compromising for the lessor of two idiots.

- Organize a headless labor movement. You can't buy off a union-boss if there is no union-boss. And stop crossing picket lines.

- For the love of god and all that is holy, stop buying all the useless shit they sell at walmart. shop local, buy sustainable and labor-friendly. Sure, your dollar doesn't go as far (literally), but you don't need a plasma tv and hummer H2 to be happy.

Or, just keep on mindlessly buying what tv tells you to buy. ignore the occasional urge to interact with your community. be a good robot, and slumber will come soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Coporate charters need to be revised
Posted by: ordaj on Jan 24, 2006 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Coporate charters need to be revised to their orignal purpose: gathering to achieve a stated goal and one-time profit. Not ongoing profits forever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Other voices echo
Posted by: ordaj on Jan 24, 2006 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like Paul Farrell's:

More myths

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Nails It!!"
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 24, 2006 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will echo others here: this article is brilliant! It should be required reading for every goofball in Congress, and the Goofball-In-Chief in the White House (oh, wait a minute...Laura will have to read it TO him...)

Worry about terrorist threats? HAH!! Just wait and see how things heat up here in the good ol' USA when we have 50- or 100-million thoroughly pissed-off former middle class workers. John Hightower is right: the fabric of society is unraveling (albeit slowly...so far). If you want a preview of things to come, just take a look at the slums of Brazil or Mexico; if you want an example of where we're heading right here at home, just look at LA's gang problem (some gangs are now spreading nation-wide). No jobs, no hope, no law; it's that simple. (Why do you think the military is developing non-lethal microwave and sonic weapons? To fight bad guys we don't care about killing now? No – they know what's coming....)

There is nothing in God's or Nature's plan that guarantees that this nation must survive; we have to work at it – and from the New Deal until the New Age of Greed, marked by mergers and aquisitions in the early 1990's, we did, admirably.

Now, just like the CEO's of corporations who enrich themselves while destroying their companies with inept management, our own government enriches itself while our moribund and self-aggrandizing Congress and the idiot neocons controlling the Executive Branch mismanage the entire nation. At this point, I would normally say, "God help us" – but I'm afraid God has left us to our own devices.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry...wrong name...
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 24, 2006 9:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please excuse my mistake: It's JIM Hightower (sorry, Jim...). I was too angry to proofread.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sadly, Unions Caused this too!
Posted by: MSS on Jan 24, 2006 9:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a big fan of unions ... but sadly, the unions' focus for the past 50 years has also led to this debacle.

Unlike European unions, which focused on state-run health care and other benefits for ALL workers, U.S. unions have focused on "benefits for just us." For the UAW and other strong and powerful unions, that has meant decent wages, good benefits, even retirement benefits.

Unfortunately, as the union movement has shrunk, WalMart has grown, and the number of companies offering health and retirement have grown smaller and smaller. That means the few companies with good benefits "for us" are under greater pressure.

Of course, the primary cause of Ford's closures is U.S. automakers' short-term decisions to build giant high-profit gas hogs and not to re-tool for the future economy with higher gas prices.

But the unions should take some credit for this debacle, too -- as they re-tool for the economy of the future. (Hopefully with strong union support for national single-payor healthcare for everyone.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about CAFE standards and Hybrid competion
Posted by: gladwyn on Jan 24, 2006 10:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Toyota is building new plants in the US under the same health care and 401k rules that GM and Ford can't function under.

We elect corporate clones to Congress who forego long term plans like CAFE standards that would have ensured the automakers had competitive products in the future. And we buy into the argument that environmental calls for fuel efficent products and global warming reduction will restrict The Market.

Then we cry that the corporate clones gave the store away to their industrial boses. And buy hybrids ourselves. Isn't it time to wake up and manage the other environmental disasters around? Liike Iraq for GM's fuel inefficent cars? And living in the sticks far from our jobs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brave New World
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jan 24, 2006 10:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What did everybody think was going to happen with NAFTA & letting countries like China join the WTO? There is no worker, using any technology, that's going to be able to compete with slave wages, no worker safety laws, no environmental controls and 6 day-a-week 12 hour shifts.

The issue was never free trade, the issue is FAIR trade. The US should only give Most Favored Nation Trade Status to countries that:
1- Allow workers to organize into independent unions & guilds.
2- Protect worker safety through OSHA-type laws and regulations.
3- Practice responsible environmental rules/guidelines.
4- Do not dump their product on developed national markets under subsidy in a predatory plan to take over a market.
5- Allow fair and reciprocal trade.

Anything else will not work. The problems experienced by the workers in Hightower's article are a symptom from a disease caused by a laundry list of trade agreements, treaties, court rulings and executive decisions made over a number of administrations and congresses of BOTH parties.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Brave New World Posted by: saywhat?
Revolution
Posted by: badkitty53 on Jan 24, 2006 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I saw that comment about revolution, I said to myself, maybe... Last summer when I heard "blood in the streets" at a barbecue from people angry at the corporations, I couldn't believe it. More and more I hear people mentioning "revolution", and as a refugee from the Sixties, I find it incredible. I've been muttering "impeachment" for almost two years, and "revolution" for the past five months. Congress should take a hint--if things get really bad, impeachment is a far better alternative. Do it now and try to buy off a revolution by reining in the corporations. Otherwise, all we have to look forward to is the trainwreck up ahead, and what with oil prices going up and global warming becoming more obvious, when people start going hungry, those troops fighting that illegal war in Iraq will come home and be used to maintain order here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GM-General Mess
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Jan 24, 2006 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GM, like Ford and Chrysler, are mercilessly dumping jobs and wages at the expense of profits and making too many vehicles which were ugly, gas-guzzling, elephantine SUVs and large pickups. For the past eighteen years those kinds of models spurred sales, but no more as they clog many city streets and the price to fuel them kept escalating.
What happened? Hightower explained quite nicely that American auto makers chose profit over quality, forcing buyers to buy an import.
Factory jobs created an avenue for workers to move into the middle class life and for families to live comfortably, but no longer. Since Reaganomics, we've seen the decline of the middle-class structure of society that WAS ONCE prominently featured on TV shows the past three decades. That's why the USA has steadily outsourced many middle-class jobs overseas. I don't see an American family of four moving to Jakarta so they get a job anytime soon. Factory closures in cities like Flint and South Gate, California devastated the tax base of those towns. Those blue-collar jobs are gone forever, and with that loss meant future generation of blue-collar workers who will have to find another line of work.
Blue-collar jobs enabled millions of Americans to get earn a good living without a college education in earlier times, but that, too is a memory.
Now that Ford (fix Or Repair Daily) will cut 30,000 jobs and close plants, the employment situation will only get worse for American autoworkers. What kind of job will they get next? A greeter at (gasp!) Wal-Mart? Can you support a family on their wages?
The same scenario has affected German autoworkers as well when Opel, a subsidiary of GM, slashed jobs and reduced benefits, which angered Opel employees. Layoffs at German car companies are nearly unthinkable. It caused an uproar in German politics.
Whatever American auto manufacturers do now, jobs are vanquished. Therefore since his/her wages are reduced, there is little incentive for U.S. autoworkers to build a quality car, like a BMW.
They won't give a damn if they're only making less than $20/hour; but in Japan, if you pay workers well they'll be more productive and would care more about the product. But General Mess, Ford and Chrysler failed that social test miserably and all we have to show for it are lousy cars and employment-and ruined lives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The crux of the matter
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Jan 24, 2006 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corporate money has bought the White House and Congress (including too many moneysoaked Democrats), so Washington has been aggressively dismantling the framework of rules and laws that allowed labor to achieve some fairness in the workplace.

This is the root of the problem. More specifically that the "corporate money" has bought both our politial parties. The corporatocracy and both parties are our enemies.

Many peop;e realize this as is evidenced by the calls for a third party. But the third party dream on a national level is just that, a dream.

Many people cling to the hope that the "good" Democratic party will rescue us. It'll never happen. The Democrats are owned by the same establishment as the Republicans.

We must take back comtrol of both parties from the rich and powerful corporate elite. This battle must be fought at the level where our pollitical power is traded for their corporate money. That is at the state and national leadership levels of both major political parties.

The time to do it is now, before the election. while your vote still has power. Once you cast your vote it has lost its power. To use the power of your vote, join the Lincoln Initiative and help make "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" a reality. Click on join now

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

finally waking up?
Posted by: parise on Jan 24, 2006 10:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
gosh, corporations putting profits before people. imagine that. i am sorry for these people and our country but only slightly sympathetic. how long have we been wearing the delusional blinders that let us believe our corporations and our governments are looking after us, that they believe in more then money? how long have we bought into the belief that we ourselves can do pretty much what we want in the search for money with no regard for the environment or the rest of the world? how long have the good old factory worker folks been supporting our empire building in the name of democracy but in the true search for profits? how long have we remained silent while corporate executives reap huge benefits because deep down we want it to happen to us, we want to be rich and if we make rules against others being filthy rich then dang, we have lost our chance? how much of this is poison we have forced ourselves to drink? the world is changing remember. the environment will not support unlimited growth. stock holders want unlimited profits. the middle class wants to live a hundred times better then the vast majority of the world. we all need to change. stock holders, exec's and the middle class. we are all going to have to simplify our existence, lessen our perceived needs, and eliminate our greedy and unnecessary wants. it's a shame though that it has to start with the lower classes but of course the wealthy will never give up their own voluntarily and the middle class and poor will probably never demand it of them because then they'd give up their chance at having more then they need.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: finally waking up? Posted by: badkitty53
» RE: finally waking up? Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: finally waking up? Posted by: parise
» RE: finally waking up? Posted by: YogiBear
Thomas Bico, a genuine moderate independent nails FORD for promoting SUV guzzlerism !
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 24, 2006 11:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
clinker
Posted by: cottontail on Jan 24, 2006 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd give a month's SS check to know the exact percentage of these "middle class" well-paid workers, who now face pay cuts and/or job loss, voted for the doofus in the White House. If they voted for Bush it's not a stretch to assume they also voted for Repugnicrats for the House and Senate.
Now that it's too damn late they'll probably start paying attention to whom and what they're voting for. Dumb, fat and happy is not going to last much longer across this nation. When people put dorks like Santorum, Sessions, Coleman, Hastert, DeLay and Cunningham in Congress, they deserve what they get.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: clinker Posted by: solacel
» RE: clinker Posted by: billfaster
» RE: clinker Posted by: cottontail
» RE: clinker Posted by: billfaster
» RE: clinker Posted by: crusty
Too simple
Posted by: davcrock on Jan 24, 2006 1:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While many of the points are valid, there are other issues here. Fundamentally, the Japanese car manufacturers are out competing GM and Ford. First and foremost, Honda and Toyota excel operationally in refining their manufacturing process which allows them to produce higher quality cars at a cheaper price. Frankly, Ford and GM's lack of operations excellence should be blamed on both the companies and the UAW. There is so much acrimony between the two that improving a process becomes too difficult with workers and managment both digging in their heels. A plague of quality problems and overly expensive assembly lines are the result. Second, GM and Ford are straddled with huge retirement costs. Fixed benefit plans are very expensive to maintain. Toyota and Honda do not have these expensive retirement benefits. I suspect in order for GM to survive, retirement benefits will have to be migrated to a fixed contribution plan. Furthermore, contrary to the author, GM does pay significantly more. Check out http://www.npr.org/news/specials/gmvstoyota/gm_toyota_comparison.html
Most of the figures here will back up what I've argued thus far as well. Fundamentally, the world is changing, and GM, Ford, and the UAW will all have to change with it or face extinction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» One more thing Posted by: peritonlogon
Thanks!
Posted by: VpandoraV on Jan 24, 2006 2:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you, Mr. Hightower and BRAVO for telling it like it really is! I've grown up listening to these exact same arguements around my grandparent's dinner table for most of my 35 years and have been wondering when we as a nation are going to wake up and fix this mess. I remember clearly how my grandmother described the rioting and killing of the 20's and 30's and for a (short) while thought it was just old people talking about the past. I WAS WRONG. I can tell you I first noticed this in the 80's as a white teenager growing up in a black ghetto and believe me the black teenagers noticed it too as the wealthy elite have been doing this to their community since they won their freedom. It seems the corporate elite don't notice us working/middle class citizens (of any race) unless we're slaving and scraping for THEM. The predominate mindset of people of that class seems to be that if you aren't wealthy then there is something inherently wrong with your character or that you deserve to be treated as less than human. I have witnessed this attitude from the wealthy of all colors but I have also witnessed extreme compassion from (a few) wealthy philantropists. The latter tend to have grown up poor or middle class themselves or were taught at a young age that the size of your pocketbook is NOT a good indicator of character. Funny how most of the people being indicted in everything these days is rich, no? Maybe we common people should start looking at THEM as if there is something wrong with their character and see how they like it.
As long as we workers are complacent about this issue it will not go away. If you work for a business that has been bitten by the greed bug -STAND UP AND FIGHT! If you work for a business that still treats it's workers well -STAND UP AND FIGHT FOR YOUR FELLOW MAN!
Send letters and e-mails to your congressperson. Deluge their offices with angry phone calls. Call and write your local newspaper and news stations. Vote your representative/senator out of office. If all else fails - MARCH ON WASHINGTON - they can't ignore us all - especially if we give them a good fight like our ancestors did. If your fellow employees strike don't you DARE cross that picket line. Pick up a sign and join in! Remember there are more of us than there are of them and the wealthy WILL learn to put their $$$ where their mouth is and pay us good wages and benefits if we refuse to let them get away with anything less.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Excellent But There's A Bigger Picture
Posted by: Jim Shaw on Jan 24, 2006 4:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well spoken, Mr. Hightower! I still think your “There’s Nothing in the Middle of the Road but Yellow Stripes and Dead Armadillos” is the finest book on politics I’ve ever read.

I concur with the vast majority of what you said in this article, but I also agree with those who have pointed out that American labor, especially the UAW, has at times been excessively greedy and selfish. I work for a company that subcontracts with GM, and also know plenty of people who have friends and relatives who work for GM. Some of the stories these people tell are amazing. For example, there have been numerous hourly employees who have gotten other people to clock-in and out for them, and gotten paid for playing hooky. And drunkenness and sleeping on the job have been rampant over the years.

I also think something else is going on here, beyond the breakdown of the labor compact… I think that advancing technology is proving to eliminate jobs faster than it creates new ones (the Luddites were right!). What I’m talking about here is the “improving productivity” which is so often noted and lauded, but which comes primarily from ever-increasing automation that kills jobs and reduces the bargaining power of those still employed. This wasn’t a huge problem in the United States until labor “protectionism” was smashed by agreements like NAFTA and GATT. Before then, the U.S. used its military and economic might to force other countries into one-sided trade agreements that weakened their labor sectors but largely shielded our own. Of course, we didn’t complain much while so many other suffered.

Furthermore, I feel a pressing need to point out that Capitalism, a virus spawned by materialism and fear, is untenable in the long run, because it is centered on the constant conversion of money into capital and then back into money, and hence endless growth (not to mention endless militarism). If you slow it down, it tends to collapse on itself, with dire consequences for all. Capitalism really needs to be replaced. It should be obvious to all thinking beings that endless growth is impossible in a limited environment, such as planet Earth. When are democrats and liberals going to wake up and realize this simple fact, and start planning a sane future characterized by sharing and a sense of sufficiency? We certainly can’t afford to wait for the Republicans to wake up.

Peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the average american CEO makes 437 TIMES
Posted by: Loopylafae on Jan 24, 2006 5:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as much as his worker!! .. & yet every time you turn on the T.V. --the super-rich are being worshipped ( take Paris Hilton for example --Take her, take her please!!) ...It's appalling that these greedy parasites don't hang their heads in shame...you hear about "collectors" with 50 extravagant cars, or $50,000 dresses, gold-plated baubles & trinkets for dogs --- how can they sleep knowing there are over a millin homeless children??? ....Greed SHOULD still be considered a flaw, instead it is flaunted ...sad ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What a football player contributes Posted by: peritonlogon
IT'S ALL CYCLICAL!
Posted by: drricklippin on Jan 24, 2006 5:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hightower's article is truly excellent. He recognizes we have hit bottom. We either reform now or our US noble experiment is finished. I predict our fellow American citizens will choose life over cultural self-destruction. Yet history teaches us that cultures do indeed die? I believe all the pus is coming or being squeezed out. While not a pleasant metaphor I believe it to be apt. Being cleansed of this rotteness we are about to enter a 21st century version of a rebirth of the ideals of our great founding fathers. They had it right -We screwed it up!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Economics & common sence
Posted by: agitatur on Jan 24, 2006 11:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When asked what is "economics" most Americans have no clear definition of the word. Yet, "economics" plays a far larger part
in every day life than the Constitution, Bill Of Rights, and the laws of civil government.

But, the economic government is not founded on democatic ideals. It is by definition a autocratic institution. What is not
readily observable is that there exists an on-going war between
the civil government and the economic government. And the decline of lifestyle for America's blue-collar workforce clearly
shows which governmnet is wining the war.

All of which brings me to this: The "Economy" is simply the
means by which any given society uses to meet that society's wants and needs. Well, it's a little more complicated than that, but that is the bottom line.

The real problem lies in this : The economy should fit the needs of the people, not people fitting the needs of the economy! Let me say that again: The economy should fit the needs of the people, not people fitting the needs of the economy.

And until this becomes a reality, greed and war will be a part of life for mankind. Greed drives captialism and unfettered
captialism will eventually evolve into fascism and the destruction of captialism itself. FDR saw this back in the 1930's and prevented the collapse of captialism by means of
regulation.

The Reagan Revolution and the conservative's control of the
government since, has conspired to once again open up Pandora's Box. And the results are all around us today. Deregulation of business and finance has put the US on a downward slide into despotism, wage slavery, and abject poverty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: conomics & common sence Posted by: drricklippin
I don't understand
Posted by: dlf on Jan 25, 2006 8:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what everyone is upset about all the automakers are doing is what other industries like meatpacking, construction, agriculture, and the hotel industry have done. As these jobs become unskilled labor jobs (in name only) they will be done by foreign labor right here in this country. But many progressives refuse to see how wage reduction, give backs, take backs, and less health care benefits have changed labor markets in the industries I listed above. These industries are now havens for illegal workers. Once Americans have no incentive other than survival to do the work they will abandon the industry. Those people who today are sympathetic to their cause (because they know the wages are good) in a couple of years will be saying, "But Americans don't want to do that work." We've done it with the other industries, meatpackers and carpenters used to make $10 to $16 an hour back in the 70's and 80's. Today those industries are paying between $6 and $10 an hour.

BOOM TIME AND INTERNAL CRISIS, 1970-1979
Past and current members of Local 308 remember the years between 1970 and 1982 as "boom years." Jobs were plentiful and wages more than tripled from $5.49 in 1969 to 16.52 by 1982. Even the wage controls the Nixon administration implemented in 1971 did not hamper the rising wages of Cedar Rapids carpenters. Increased construction, a tight labor market, and inflation were partly responsible for the wage raises. They were also a result of the seventy years Cedar Rapids carpenters spent fighting to improve working conditions and building their union. Carpenters from Cedar Rapids recognized the historic role the union played in securing them a decent wage, and membership reached an all time high in 1979 of 722 members. http://www.carpenterslocal308.com/history/1970s.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I don't understand Posted by: dlf
The Revolutionary Worker Reported This
Posted by: dlf on Jan 25, 2006 8:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Changes in the Meat Packing Industry
What has brought about this unique migration? How did workers from as far away as Southeast Asia, Africa, and Latin America come to live and work in America's heartland?

To understand the situation in Storm Lake today, you have to look at how the U.S. meat-packing industry has been shaped by imperialism--the capitalist drive for profit and the never-ending search for new ways to exploit the proletariat.

Meat-packing has been a big part of the economy in Storm Lake for decades and there have been big changes in the U.S. meat-packing industry over the last 25 years.

http://rwor.org/a/v19/920-29/920/storm.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Revolution Would Fail For We The People
Posted by: Riverside on Jan 30, 2006 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Saying and thinking revolution in times of great national unrest stirs the blood and focuses our wrath, but it also steals our reason.

The foundations of this great nation are simply spectacular, and are built upon ages of political experience handed down to us by our founding fathers who got much of their inspiration from our British and European friends. We took the best of all of it and built these United States. We need to preserve that. It is irreplaceable.

What we must do is reclaim our rights and liberties as guaranteed to us by our Constitution. We need to let our representatives up for election know that if they can't help they are out.

Guess what, to do even this we need to get a lot more organized that we are. We need to drop petty differences and come togther to save the U.S. and thus us. Yeah, I preach this all the time. It is not as invigorating as a real, red-hot revolution, but revolution first must destroy and then rebuild.. We do not need to do either of those, we just need to reclaim the really good stuff that is already ours.

Look at sweet Liberty standing tall in New York harbor. You know who she is? She is the heart of America. We are an open armed country holding high the torch of freedom and opportunity. We must keep our heart alive and beating.

Our flag? It is a symbol of the most awesome courage, sacrifice, unity and downright love of country that any nation could ever hope to have. As Liberty is our heart, our flag is our spine. Preserving both of these makes us whole again. Then we can joyfully shout, God bless America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

another disposable worker goes down . . .
Posted by: snowleopard24 on Feb 13, 2006 8:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My brother-in-law worked for Northwest Airlines as a lead mechanic for more than twenty years. He was one of those who turned over his pension funds, $15,000 at that time, to NWAL in exchange for company stock to help keep the airlines flying.

He and his union always supported the other unions when they walked, but when they needed them, the flight attendants and pilots were afraid to support the mechanics.

For months before the strike, Northwest hired strikebreakers at full scale, and put them up in hotels in Minneapolis-St. Paul waiting for the day they would walk across the picket lines, a decision reached by their multi-millionare corporate executive officers.

Two years short of full retirement, my b-i-l had to take early retirement, because he knows his job will never be there again for him. He's now pulling in $800 a month in retirement, and the $15,000 account is now worth about $300. Had he made it two more years, and retired before the strike, he would have been able to count on about $2500 each month.

I asked my sister how he was doing, and she said, "We just don't talk about it. I hate to see him get upset about it all over again."

These folks are the backbone of this country, the ones who kept getting up and doing what they needed to do to keep the airlines flying. The secure future they were working towards and counting on splintered in front of their eyes, and slipped through their fingers at the last moment. Think it can't happen to all of us? Why not?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

03/02/2006 - Bush in India Today.
Posted by: rumoret on Mar 2, 2006 4:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And today we have bush in India....stating how we Americans look forward to tasting a Mango from India.

What you have here is jobs getting outsourced--wages be cut--illegals pouring in for the lower paying jobs--companies forcing out men and women in their 50's--Government talking about raising the social security to age 80. Now tell me who is going to hire a man in his late 50's when you have college students graduating every year who need jobs...and they themselves have to compete with foreign workers who are also educated.

The Elite are trying to SPEED UP the decline of the middle class with all of the deeds listed above. Yes.......a revolution is coming to America......and the Elite are trying to prepare the laws to save themselves from this WRATH!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]