Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Let's Get 'Physical'

By Will Doig, Nerve.com. Posted January 25, 2006.


In a new book, author James McManus puts himself through every medical test known to the Mayo Clinic. The results are surprisingly...sexual.
book

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Will Doig

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

When Harper's magazine sent James McManus to Las Vegas six years ago to cover the World Series of Poker, he cashed his advance into chips and entered the tournament. That assignment became the basis for his last book, Positively Fifth Street, which earned raves for its first-hand reporting.

With his latest book, Physical, McManus turns that passion for average-joe experiential journalism toward our health-care system. He checks into the Mayo Clinic and undergoes every battery of test imaginable, frequently stopping to muse about nurses who incite erections at inopportune moments, the politics of lying to your doctor, the libidinous effects of marijuana and the inelegance of the prostate exam. We spoke to McManus about the difficulties and indignities of first-world medical care.

Your book, though not specifically about sex, ends up being quite a bit about the sexual awkwardness created by our health care system. It occurs to me that health issues and sex issues are similar in that they're both things people feel they need to whisper about.

I think that's true, although I think it's becoming less so. You've got people like Katie Couric and David Letterman. Bill Clinton's talking to Larry King as he's about to get his chest ripped open with saws. That boundary is coming down. Although I think people still don't talk about their sex lives too openly.

You write that, statistically speaking, people in marriages and long-term relationships are healthier than single people.

Richer, healthier, longer-lived. The actuaries really are clear about it.

Do you think routine health care is more awkward and more psychologically fraught for men than it is for women?

Yes. Just look at how the culture clothes us. When you go out to a fancy event, men are covered up from Adam's apple to toe, and women have these very revealing party dresses on. I think the male power structure demands that men be more fully clothed than women, so when we have to take our clothes off and interact bodily with someone else in a clinical setting, it is more embarrassing for men than it is for women.

For example, you write about your prostate exam at the Mayo Clinic, and how afterward, against your instincts, you and the doctor have to sit there and talk as though nothing that threatens your manhood just happened.

Right. We have to pretend this stuff doesn't make us feel weird because he's a "medical professional." And he's sitting there wearing your shit stain on his finger and his Prada suit. It's a strange situation. I'm not complaining about it. I had a glorious experience at the Mayo. But it is an awkward experience. You've got these young, hot babes stripping you down and stressing you, shaving your chest hairs and whatnot. My primary care physician is female, and it's very different getting a prostate exam from her than from a male doctor, one simple reason being that male doctors have bigger fingers.

It seems we're all expected to be more comfortable with the medicalization of sex than we're culturally ready to be. Things like erectile dysfunction ads, penile implants -- for men, is this empowering or just emasculating?

I don't think it's empowering. It feels slightly emasculating. I also just think it's funny. As a writing teacher, I'm always getting questions from students like, "Can I write about this if it's going to embarrass my stepbrother or my mother or whoever?" And I say, yeah, you have to go there. You're sort of signing up for that embarrassment when you write. When they're measuring your blubber content, you don't want to report that to the world. You don't even want to have the nurse standing there while she's doing it.


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Too bad he can't get a Pap smear, too.
Posted by: Samantha Vimes on Jan 25, 2006 4:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As he so blithely assures us having a prostate exam or even getting naked for men is so much more traumatic and disempowering than having your feet up in straps while doctors pick up metal instruments that look like torture devices in order to scrape a bit of skin from inside, resulting in cramps that last for half an hour or more after is for women.

Yes, being fully clothed is a sign of power. That's why women's wear is an *issue*. Women who dress skimpily around the office are less likely to get promoted, according to recent research. All his commentary says is that many women have learned to suck up the feeling of powerlessness and get on with business.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is Painful
Posted by: oakgroveinn on Jan 25, 2006 4:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not sure what to make of this except the author sounds strangely insecure and apologetic, shallow and selfish. This is without mentioning his lax and sloppy language. Might there be something more productive in his future? One hopes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is Painful Posted by: Arianna
What about that first question?
Posted by: mizipi on Jan 25, 2006 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the past few years, everytime I have been to see a doctor, the first question is NOT "What is your name?", NOT "Why are you here? What problem do you have?", no, the first question is "DO YOU HAVE INSURANCE?" and that, my friends, is the whole problem with health care today in the USA>

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

no sympathy
Posted by: deborama on Jan 25, 2006 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, no sympathy for this guy. No sympathy at all for men who "don't want to impregnate anyone" but won't have a vasectomy because it fucks with their image of themselves as CAPABLE of impregnating someone. This guy KNOWS it's not fair to make his wife carry the contraceptive burden, but for no good reason decides to let her keep carrying it anyhow. The vast majority of men do the same. So they're all walking around taking Viagra and keeping their vas deferens open to sustain the illusion that they're young and "potent," lol that word really cracks me up.

Let's face it, men don't want to create a baby at least 99.99% of the time they want to fuck. Time to take some responsibility for that guys. "It gives me an icky feeling" is not an excuse. As the poster above noted, gyno exams are not exactly a day at the beach, and yet we women just suck it up and get on with it. Aren't men strong enough to do the same? Apparently not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: no sympathy (vasectomies) Posted by: sistrmoon29
» RE: no sympathy Posted by: saywhat?
» RE: no sympathy Posted by: yesman
» RE: no sympathy Posted by: saywhat?
Woops, to above
Posted by: RavenSteele on Jan 25, 2006 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My previous comment, after the first post, was meant to be a new comment not a reply. Please scroll up to see it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whole lot of whinin' going on....
Posted by: xenacat on Jan 25, 2006 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I expected that this article was going to be about sexual abuse by medical professionals from the blurb. Good lord, this author sounds like he doesn't have much of a life. Doesn't want to impair his fertility but doesn't want to impregnate his wife, doesn't like men examining him, doesn't like women examining him and thinks that men are mainly attracted to young women 'cause its, well, its jus' nach-tu-ral. Jeez - how about a nice visit to an online psychologist? Won't have to deal with gender there, if he doesn't want to do so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sounds like a shallow read.
Posted by: bettsoff on Jan 25, 2006 10:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's a lot here about the interpersonal intersections of gender, sexuality, and power that it sounds like the author completely skipped in favor of talking about cultural squeamishness about sex and medicine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why is it that
Posted by: esactun on Jan 25, 2006 11:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... many of the comments here sound analogous to those of a male chauvinist griping about a "women's magazine" article?

While there are plenty of good points raised--and the author himself did make some pretty questionable statements to my mind--there seems to be a bit of unfairness lurking around things like his not writing the book that some posters would have preferred, but more about getting no slack whatsoever for his very human feelings over medical procedures that touch upon the vast morass of hangups and baggage males carry around in our society regarding sex/masculinity/genitalia etc. He spoke of his discomfort and is trashed as pathetic and in need of psychiatric help (way to get guys to open up more!)--but that's a lot like what chauvinists say about women re: sex harassment (and many other things)--

He was trashed over the need for a "potent" self-image*, yet women are celebrated when they try to protect their sense of femininity through having an IVF child at any cost, or getting implants/prostheses post-mastectomy. Women who are infertile (and esp. women who've had hysterectomies) often report feeling like "less of a woman". Is this to be considered pathetic as well?

* It's often said that men don;'t understand women, and that's very likely true. But not understanding the "potency" issue--and how central it often is to male self-image in Western cultures, going back at least as far as Kings** in the Bible--shows that the reverse is true as well. To call the author pathetic over that is similar to telling young girls getting bulimia from reading Cosmo that they're just being silly. And those who don't understand how culturally uncomfortable a rectal exam must seem for an Average American Joe obviously did not grow up as a boy in this country.

**12:10, I think--"Thus shalt thou speak unto this people that spake unto thee, saying, Thy father made our yoke heavy, but make thou it lighter unto us; thus shalt thou say unto them, My little finger shall be thicker than my father's loins." -- penis size as power. Ugh!

That women undoubtedly have had it worse under patriarchy does not mean that psychological baggage does not affect men detrimentally. It's not a zero-sum thing. And I don't think it's fair to attack men for airing their complaints over what society does to them just because those in power have traditionally been male (and only a select few of them, in fact).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why is it that Posted by: Samantha Vimes
» RE: Why is it that Posted by: esactun
» RE: Why is it that Posted by: yesman
Disappointment in responses
Posted by: peritonlogon on Jan 25, 2006 12:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The ideas put forth by James McManus are certainly worth thinking about. They're not particularly deep or earth shattering, but nonetheless, worth thinking about. The various critiques leveled 1)his language was weak 2) ad hominem 3) that the article didn't fit the standard type set of Alternet articles (I'm reinterpreting this remark "I expected that this article was going to be about sexual abuse by medical professionals from the blurb.") are quite increddible.... I mean by that, I can't believe them, I can't believe people actually wrote them. They basically all claim that the article was shallow, pointless and they didn't agree with them but the "singal to noise ratio" in all of the comments make the article seem like a digitally remastered CD to the comments' respective 45's.

Now, to answer the three basic charges.
1)(his language was weak) I disagree, He may have been (is still?) an English professor at U Chicago and as such we should hold him to pretty high standards, but, first this was an interview, second, voice is very important and he was reporting on experiences first and abstractions second.

2)(ad hominem attack) Well, not too much answering needed since it is simply logically invalid, but a joke might be nice since I'm sure everyone quakes with fear when the barrel of dime store psychology is pointed right at his or her head.

3)(The article didn't fit the standard Alternet typset) This one I agree with... but I'm not complaining.... liberalism and progressive ideas are many and manifold and they do not all revolve around indignance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Sex Drive
Posted by: eastcoker on Jan 27, 2006 8:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You write
"The hard truth at the core of this is that your physical health tremendously impacts your sexual desire, your sexual ability and your sexual desirability. People find others more or less attractive depending on what kind of physical shape they're in. You may not want to impregnate somebody, but the reason we have sex drives is to propagate the species, and if we we're not fit to do it, we would not be able to do it."
When you say you may not want to impregnate somebody, that is a man's point of view. So what is a woman's point of view, you may not want to be impregnated by somebody. Well if you don't want to be impregnated by somebody, you shouldn't be having sex with them. As you said, we have sex drives to propogate the species.
Now I personally believe we do not need to propogate the species. Since I don't want to get impregnated, I am celibate. End of story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]