Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bachelet: Si y No

By Marc Cooper, Truthdig. Posted January 20, 2006.


The election of Socialist pediatrician Michelle Bachelet as president is good news for the people of Chile. Especially given the alternatives.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Marc Cooper

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The election of Socialist pediatrician Michelle Bachelet as president on Sunday is good news for the people of Chile. Especially given the alternatives. By a 53-to-46 percent margin, Bachelet defeated the conservative candidate, Sebastian Pinera, who mostly is credited with bringing easy credit-card access to Chile.

Bachelet becomes Chile's first woman president and one of the very few female heads of state in Latin American history. Her election as a woman -- and also a self-proclaimed agnostic and single mother of three children from two different fathers -- signals, without doubt, a potentially exhilarating cultural breakthrough for what is an oddly and unusually conservative country. Not until last year was even limited divorce legalized in Chile. Abortion is still outlawed. The Catholic Church operates one of the country's most watched television networks, and the social boundaries of Chilean life sometimes feel as pinched as its string-like geographical shape.

Seventeen years of the not only politically repressive but also socially austere Pinochet dictatorship set back Chile's cultural development for untold decades. In short, Bachelet's election could help untether one very tightly wound Chilean society.

Bachelet's potential to enact more than symbolic change, however, is something that must be viewed with a certain amount of skepticism. Her Socialist Party is, in fact, a cautious middle-of-the-road formation that has a lot more in common with American Democrats than with Cuban Communists. In alliance with the center-right Christian Democrats, Socialist President Ricardo Lagos has governed for the last six years with what might be called an excessive caution.

While his administration has increased spending on health and education programs, it has refused to fundamentally alter or reform the "savage capitalist" economic system imposed by the Pinochet dictatorship. Compared with neighboring Latin American nations, Chile has, indeed, shown steady economic growth and stability. But at a high social cost that is often overlooked by its free-market boosters. Chile remains one of the most unequal economies in the world, producing fabulous wealth for a few and just above subsistence for many. There's a sizable Chilean middle class, but it lives in a state of perpetual economic fear and constraint.

Nor have Bachelet's allies shown much enthusiasm for cleaning up Chile's horrific human rights legacy for once and for all. The Lagos government exerted pressure on the courts to not fully pursue Pinochet (who nevertheless is closer to trial than ever before). Bachelet, on the other hand, was herself a victim of torture under the Pinochet regime. And her father, an air force general who had been a Cabinet minister in the government of Salvador Allende, died in custody after his own bouts with Pinochet's butchers (as a young translator to Allende at the time, I met Gen. Bachelet several times and greatly admired him).

Bachelet should be more aggressive in allowing prosecution of the remaining planners and perpetrators of torture and murder.

Perhaps more important, she should show the courage to enact significant economic reforms that start to level out the uphill playing field for most Chileans. The privatized and broken pension system cries out for more attention. As do underfunded schools and a rather hair-raising public health system. The Chilean minimum wage needs a hyper-boost. The 8 percent unemployment rate must be lowered by a public works program. And the dictatorship's draconian labor code, never fully reformed since Pinochet's departure from power, must be scrapped and redrawn to allow freer union organizing.

Chileans are a deeply disillusioned lot. Their interest in politics has plummeted over the years. First came Pinochet, who made politics illegal and dangerous. And then came 15 years of civilian rule that promised much but delivered less.

If Bachelet doesn't take bold steps to inspire and re-engage Chileans in political life, the novelty of her gender will very soon wear thin.

Digg!

Marc Cooper is a contributing editor to The Nation and a senior fellow at USC's Annenberg Institute for Justice and Journalism and was a translator for then-Chilean President Salvador Allende.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Bachelet and Chile's foreign policy
Posted by: dearkitty on Jan 20, 2006 3:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One aspect here is Bachelet and Chile's foreign policy. Signs from the campaign are that Ms Bachelet will not help Bush to overthrow the democratically elected governments of Venezuela and Bolivia. See also here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not all socialists are bad
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 20, 2006 6:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, "conservatives" too are socialist albeit different ones. See, their priority is to socialize poverty and terrorism and to keep people culturally distracted with hot-button issues such as "abortion", guns, gay/lesbian marriages, flag-burning, "illegal immigrants", etc ... all the while laughing their way to the bank at the expense of everyone else. At least this socialist in Chile is fighting for the right causes. It's not a whole lot different when you look at the Democratic governors in states like Montana and Wyoming at least on the economic front if not the social even though they too are neutral on the "abortion" issue by leaving choice as an option while being truly pro-life for the born and living.

P.S.: I strongly look forward to Bernard Sanders who never hesitates to be called a socialist to win big and I hope this sets the stage for independents just like him to gun down the "conservative" crooks that have already given America the worst rap.

Besides, Should America Fear a "Socialist" Senator?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

otto
Posted by: otto on Jan 20, 2006 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like the article. But can someone give me information about an editorial I read yesterday in the Toronto Star, taken from an earlier one in the Washington Post? It claims, among advances in Chile over the past 15 years, that poverty has gone down from 38% to 18% and that poverty in Venezuela under Chavez has risen from 43% to 53%. It warns Bolivia's president not to follow that path. Is there ANY truth in this, or is the information just "cooked up" like most Bush admiistration information?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: otto Posted by: boing007
» RE: otto Posted by: roroman
South America will continue to go left
Posted by: ccbite on Jan 20, 2006 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm always surprised by the reaction Americans and the media have to the recent shift to the left in South America. The MSM makes this out to be such a malicious bogeyman without mentioning that these heads of state were democratically elected and without context of the rampant corruption in place before these leaders took office. Chile is no Venezuela nor it is a Bolivia for that matter. Different populations, different peoples. It should be interesting to see what she can do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]