COMMENTS: 19
Made in Bangladesh, For Better or Worse
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
I hesitated. My dad was so proud that his Bangladeshi relatives owned clothing factories in Bangladesh. You could hear it in his voice because as far as Bangladeshi standards are concerned, they had made it because they were exporting to Wal-Mart.
I didn't know what to say, really, to my dad about that. In my Western frame of mind, I would never be caught dead in a Wal-Mart, I save up money to purchase sweat-shop free clothes from American Apparel, and think that Kathy Gifford was bad when her line of clothing was discovered to be made by children. But looking at it from my dad's point of view, these were his family members that pulled themselves up by the bootstraps from the village to owning a large factory in the big city of Dhaka. They own property. They export to Europe. They have huge contracts with Wal-Mart. They are khubi boro loak, "very big people."
Is there a middle to this? A way for me to be happy for my Bangladeshi relatives while supporting fair international labor practices? I'm not sure. If I ever did make it back to the mother land, high and mighty with my Western ways, I'm not likely to be taken seriously. "You don't know what it's like to live here," I picture them saying, "and why aren't you married yet?"
Making a living in Bangladesh is hard and when you don't have many choices, you take what you can get. I would never choose to own a clothing factory, but if I lived in Bangladesh, I might not have a choice.
Economically speaking, it does take fewer hours of labor to produce a shirt there than here, and thus the opportunity cost of producing a shirt is less in Bangladesh. So as long as they are paying a wage workers can live on and they don't hire children under the age of 14 (per Bangladesh's proposed Child Labor Deterrent Act of 1994), should I really be interfering?
Most people would say yes. As a matter of fact, young women are coming from Bangladesh to organize American people so that they can become aware of the conditions in these factories. They talk to activist groups about what it's like to work in the factory, what it means to start unions and to strike, to get a paid holiday.
But another message you hear is don't stop buying clothes from Bangladesh. Don't take away their jobs, just give them the opportunity to make a decent living while doing the job that they do. If the factories move out of Bangladesh due to unstrategic boycotts, then the women are left unemployed with no other choices. What we need are jobs along with fair labor practices in Bangladesh. In fact, this past September Wal-Mart workers on four continents (including Bangladesh) sued the company in the California Supreme Court, maintaining that they failed to ensure that "Wal-Mart failed to meet its contractual duty to ensure that its suppliers pay basic wages due; forced them to work excessive hours seven days a week; obstructed their attempts to form a union; and made false and misleading statements … about the company's labor and human rights practices."
Every time I go through the racks of clothes while shopping, my eyes immediately go to the "Made In …" label. When we were little and shopping with Mom, it turned into a game of trying to find the clothes that were "Made In Bangladesh," and yelling out to my mom that we had found one. Maybe it came from one of our relatives' factories! When I see the "Made in" label now, I'm torn. Should I not buy the shirt and support American-made, or should I support Bangladeshi-made clothes and take the risk that it came from a sweatshop?
In the end, all I said to my father as he sat on the carpet with T-shirts strewn about from our relatives' clothing factories in Bangladesh was, "Thanks, Dad." What else could I say?
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oldsmobile on Jan 19, 2006 2:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is true, that the environment is really suffering from such activity, rivers are polluted, ancient mountains are being stripmined and so on. These are all things in plain sight. Of course, nothing they do is anything worse than what they have done in western countries for centuries. The cradle of industrialism, Belgium is the worlds most polluted country, after all.
I spoke to construction worker who was building a giant mall in Shanghai and asked him how much he makes. He works 12hour days, 7 days a week and earns 2000RMB a month, that would be about 250 dollars. However, that kind of money will actually go a long way in Shanghai alone (perhaps like making 2000 dollars a month), and Shanghai is super expensive compared to the countryside. This particular person had a family somewhere in rural China. The money he was making would have really gone a long way there. Asked how things are now, he said he was extremely happy and things were jsut so much better than before.
So I ask you, should we deny this person his money and his work? Should we tell him, he should not have his opportunities? Should we tell him to go back to the countryside to live in absolute poverty?
I could not bring myself to do it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» This is a global issue
Posted by: anothername
» RE: This is a global issue
Posted by: Livemike
Comments are closed-
Posted by: krose on Jan 19, 2006 7:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drewch on Jan 19, 2006 8:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» American Apparel is NOT sweat-free
Posted by: clover
» RE: drewch
Posted by: Longhorn
» RE: drewch
Posted by: drewch
» In defense of American Apparel
Posted by: weronika
» RE: In defense of American Apparel
Posted by: drewch
» RE: In defense of American Apparel
Posted by: weronika
» RE: In defense of American Apparel
Posted by: clover
» RE: In defense of American Apparel
Posted by: weronika
Comments are closed-
Posted by: radiohead on Jan 19, 2006 9:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jjolese on Jan 19, 2006 2:29 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Consumers in every country must make their purchases on a case by case, unit by unit basis, keeping the WORKERS who made that product in mind, not their own personal wealth or their family's wealth. The truth is, most countries we outsource to have tremendous problems handling the rights of their workers. I do truly wish to do what I can to help them improve their lives, but the economic models implemented so far in most countries are wholly inadequate and headed in the wrong direction when it comes to fair distribution of opportunity and resources, even Bangladesh.
I still believe that buying American is still doing more good for more people than buying foreign right now. Labor standards need to rise significantly within these other countries before we begin building factories there. Unless this is done, workers will never achieve the kind of lives they deserve for their hard work and big business will continue to take advantage of the status quo.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: logic of the issue
Posted by: krose
» RE: logic of the issue
Posted by: rabidLibrarian
Comments are closed-
Posted by: badkitty53 on Jan 19, 2006 3:31 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: just a friend on Jan 20, 2006 7:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oldsmobile on Jan 19, 2006 2:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is true, that the environment is really suffering from such activity, rivers are polluted, ancient mountains are being stripmined and so on. These are all things in plain sight. Of course, nothing they do is anything worse than what they have done in western countries for centuries. The cradle of industrialism, Belgium is the worlds most polluted country, after all.
I spoke to construction worker who was building a giant mall in Shanghai and asked him how much he makes. He works 12hour days, 7 days a week and earns 2000RMB a month, that would be about 250 dollars. However, that kind of money will actually go a long way in Shanghai alone (perhaps like making 2000 dollars a month), and Shanghai is super expensive compared to the countryside. This particular person had a family somewhere in rural China. The money he was making would have really gone a long way there. Asked how things are now, he said he was extremely happy and things were jsut so much better than before.
So I ask you, should we deny this person his money and his work? Should we tell him, he should not have his opportunities? Should we tell him to go back to the countryside to live in absolute poverty?
I could not bring myself to do it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» This is a global issue
Posted by: anothername
» RE: This is a global issue
Posted by: Livemike
Comments are closed-
Posted by: krose on Jan 19, 2006 7:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drewch on Jan 19, 2006 8:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» American Apparel is NOT sweat-free
Posted by: clover
» RE: drewch
Posted by: Longhorn
» RE: drewch
Posted by: drewch
» In defense of American Apparel
Posted by: weronika
» RE: In defense of American Apparel
Posted by: drewch
» RE: In defense of American Apparel
Posted by: weronika
» RE: In defense of American Apparel
Posted by: clover
» RE: In defense of American Apparel
Posted by: weronika
Comments are closed-
Posted by: radiohead on Jan 19, 2006 9:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jjolese on Jan 19, 2006 2:29 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Consumers in every country must make their purchases on a case by case, unit by unit basis, keeping the WORKERS who made that product in mind, not their own personal wealth or their family's wealth. The truth is, most countries we outsource to have tremendous problems handling the rights of their workers. I do truly wish to do what I can to help them improve their lives, but the economic models implemented so far in most countries are wholly inadequate and headed in the wrong direction when it comes to fair distribution of opportunity and resources, even Bangladesh.
I still believe that buying American is still doing more good for more people than buying foreign right now. Labor standards need to rise significantly within these other countries before we begin building factories there. Unless this is done, workers will never achieve the kind of lives they deserve for their hard work and big business will continue to take advantage of the status quo.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: logic of the issue
Posted by: krose
» RE: logic of the issue
Posted by: rabidLibrarian
Comments are closed-
Posted by: badkitty53 on Jan 19, 2006 3:31 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: just a friend on Jan 20, 2006 7:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




