Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Bestselling Fake True Story

By Sheerly Avni, Truthdig. Posted January 13, 2006.


Although James Frey is off the hook, if Oprah loses faith in nonfiction, it could cripple the immensely popular -- and profitable -- memoir market.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Sheerly Avni

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

On Tuesday, the investigative website The Smoking Gun published the six-page report, "A Million Little Lies," exposing a number of fictional events in James Frey's supposedly nonfiction memoir A Million Little Pieces.

TSG reported that the confessional, an Oprah Book Club selection and a memoir of Frey's struggle with drug and alcohol abuse and eventual recovery, was riddled with exaggerations, embellishments and outright lies, including claims that he'd beat up a cop and spent three months in jail, as well as an extremely suspect incident involving a fatal car accident.

The scandal was certainly enough to undermine the credibility of the memoir, the man and, worse, Oprah's taste in books. It also made Frey famous. Not just writer famous, but star famous. JT LeRoy hasn't quite capitalized on his 15 minutes -- perhaps because his is a more narrow audience, perhaps because it's hard to do television appearances when you don't exist -- but Frey, already flourishing under Oprah's halo, now managed to do the near impossible: The scandal over his untrue true story bumped both Lindsay Lohan and Brangelina out of the headlines.

Usually it takes weeks or months for beleaguered celebrities to orchestrate their public coming-out, but these are accelerated times, and James Frey broke his media silence two days ago, choosing a celebrity interviewer known for his unrelenting questioning style, ruthless integrity and dogged determination to get the truth at all costs: Larry King. King grilled the famous fabricator with questions such as "Are you surprised at the furor?" and "What are your feelings about 'The Smoking Gun?'" and "Are you a bad guy?"

To be fair to King, Frey has been well coached, and he seems to have learned his interview strategies from George Bush: Repeat a few choice phrases over and over again, do not answer any questions directly, evade, and do it all with a charmless affect and slippery evasions of responsibility at every turn. Above all, stay on message. Which is exactly what Frey did. Frey's "defense" seemed to involve matching one of three answers to every question posed: "I stand by my book and my life" and "changed facts to protect people's identities" and "This is a book about drug and alcohol abuse, nobody has once denied that I was an addict."

His big defense is that since the disputed sections make up only a small percentage of the book's page count, the matter is being blown out of proportion. This is a blank refusal to face the idea that telling the whole truth is exactly what credibility is all about. In addition to being specious and illogical, the Frey non-conversation with King wasn't getting anywhere, even after Frey's mother came on screen to defend her baby.


Digg!

Sheerly Avni is a San Francisco-based writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
agitator church and state
Posted by: eileenflmng on Jan 13, 2006 5:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Want The Truth?

Quit buying books and read WAWA:WeAreWideAwake, is a Pro-Bono Public Service discourse confronting media and governments that shield the whole truth. We who are wide awake are compelled by the "fierce urgency of Now"[Rev MLK] to raise awareness and promote the human dialogue about many of the crucial issues of our day: the state of our Union and in protection of democracy, what life is like for Christians in Israel Palestine in the 21st Century, nuclear weapons, the environment, science, medicine, theology and spirituality.

WAWA's Witness and Reporter just returned from Israel Palestine.

The WAWA BLOG from Dec. 20, 2005 through Jan 11, 2006 proves that WAWA's reporter follows her heart and not the dollar.

http://www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

agitator church and state
Posted by: eileenflmng on Jan 13, 2006 6:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also on WAWA is the FICTIONAL account of one addict; Jack Hunt- read Chapter 6: THAT DAY to catch up.

Keep Hope Alive II FREE and available on WAWA Homepage:

Chapter 1: 16 Days in Israel Palestine
Chapter 2: The Revolution has started now...
Chapter 3: Stem Cell Research and Sex at 68
Chapter 4: Okay Okay
Chapter 5: Cats and Compassion
Chapter 6: THAT DAY
Chapter 7: The Next Step
Chapter 8: 9/11/05 and the Gulfport Blues
Chapter 9: A Confrontational Conversation
Chapter 10: All I've Got

WAWA:
http://www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Is This News?
Posted by: dlf on Jan 13, 2006 8:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If this book hadn't been picked by Oprah would this article have even been written? Part of drug and alcohol addiction is lying and or memory loss, anybody whose been through it knows that. So my question is in the grand scheme of things is this information earth shattering?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Burn the lying bastard at the stake
Posted by: Drae on Jan 13, 2006 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know why? Because he is a fracking lier. And he wrote a book that was supposed to be true. One that I was going to send to my drug addicted brother to inspire him to face his problems honestly and go on. Because I was a drug addict. And I quit in exactly the same way Frey supposedly quit--by making the decision. And I identified with him and his "Honesty." His bullshit.
Because he appropriated the death of two high school girls and used them to make his almighty buck.
But most of all, becasue I am sick of these holier-than-thou assholes in government and business and now publishing telling us LIES and then expecting us to say, hey, it's ok. Lie to us. We're sheeple. We don't count.
If we won't make a distinction between fiction and non-fiction anymore--there just aren't words to convey my disgust.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I really do not understand all the fuss...
Posted by: natalie on Jan 13, 2006 12:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I picked up this book at the local library three years ago and read it back then.
It is a book. He is a writer. It's his account. This is a capitilist society--If you don't like it, don't buy it.
There are so many more important things for people to get thier panties in a wad about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fraud, Natalie--Fraud
Posted by: Drae on Jan 13, 2006 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Natalie says that in a capitalist society, one need not buy the book if one doesn't like that it is fiction. That's the point, Natalie. This book is fraudulently labeled as non-fiction. I wouldn't have bought the thing had it been labeled non-fiction.
In your version of capitalism, is it ok to lie to make a sale?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:Fraud? probably....but Posted by: oleMnRose
Bullshit! Bullshit!! Bullshit!!! BULLSHITT!!!!!! BULLSHITT!!!!!!!
Posted by: Againstthewindwalking on Jan 16, 2006 3:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
C'mon people!! It's entertainment news!!! It's ALL BULLSHIT!!! Seen "Batboy" lately? Nope? Me neither! Yet the "Enquirer" or some of it's ilk, were all over it a few years back!

Is the book bullshit? Who the hell knows! It was written by a so-called drug addict! (Oh by the way, I used to be one so don't go giving me shit about not understanding! Don't tell me shit about I'll always be one 'cause that's shit too) I know how junkies get! And I know it's hard to get out of that mind set! Who knows! In his own mind this guy might be telling the gospel truth! He just denies your reality and substitutes his own!

Get over it! In a world shot to hell by George Bush and his neocon buddies, who really gives a shit!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» BATBOY BULLSHIT ??! Posted by: zipper696
What about his wife?
Posted by: tdean on Jan 17, 2006 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just curious, but where does his spouse (wife) fit in the picture? I wonder if he sold the same pack of lies to her and she is just sitting back saying "what's the big deal".

Did he lie to her like he did everyone else? How many nights did he get her sympathy for the whoppers he told everyone at his rock star like book tours, and tv appearances? If she believed him too, how foolish has he made his own wife look. I wonder if it's a big deal to her that their relationship was built on a foundation of lies.

Would anyone care if their significant other made their entire history up?

------the alternative of course is that she did know but really doesn't care because look at her pad now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rover
Posted by: Roverton on Jan 18, 2006 1:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is "Shiny-Distracto News".

We should know better, people.
Look everywhere this story isn't.

Don't take the bait.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]