Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Dumping Lieberman

By Emily Biuso, The Nation. Posted January 16, 2006.


Are Connecticut Democrats ready to replace Sen. Joseph Lieberman in the primary election?
Advertisement

At the close of a regular Democratic Town Committee meeting in Manchester, Conn., in December, 79-year-old Joe Rafala, a World War II veteran and party worker for more than 60 years, decided he had had enough with the state's junior senator, Joe Lieberman.

Rafala, like many in Connecticut, had voted for Lieberman in the past but is troubled by Lieberman's continued public support for the Iraq war. Before the meeting adjourned, Rafala presented a surprise motion proposing that the committee reproach the senator by sending him a letter criticizing his stance on Iraq.

"I was upset about our boys and girls in the armed forces getting killed, coming home in body bags," Rafala says. On January 3, the committee overwhelmingly passed the resolution. Rafala, who considers himself a moderate Democrat, speaks for many in the state who have tired of Lieberman's constant cheerleading for the war and for President Bush. "This man has gone too far," he says.

It's pretty unusual for a Democratic Town Committee to formally criticize its Democratic senator. Lieberman appears to be taking the action seriously, as he has offered to meet with Rafala and others from the committee early next week. But the senator's office did not respond to requests to comment for this article.

Lieberman has been a fixture in Connecticut politics since 1970, when he served in the State Senate. He was a popular state attorney general in the 1980s, and voters catapulted him to the U.S. Senate in a stunning upset in 1988 against incumbent Lowell Weicker. Though liberals griped at Lieberman's frequent backbends toward the center, support for him remained strong. In 1994 Lieberman won the largest landslide victory ever in a Connecticut Senate race against Republican Gerald Labriola. Six years later, when he simultaneously ran for re-election and stood as Al Gore's vice presidential running mate, Connecticut voters sent him to the Senate again, apparently untroubled that his ambitions appeared to lie elsewhere.

But Lieberman's support for the war has alienated many of his constituents who are frustrated with an occupation that seems to have no end in sight.

Just as a political moderate like Joe Rafala is an unlikely figure to emerge as a critic of Lieberman's stance on the war, Manchester is an unlikely town to play host to any kind of protest. Democrats have dominated local politics for 33 of the past 35 years, and registered Democrats far outnumber registered Republicans. A former mill town in central Connecticut with a population of 55,000, Manchester sits just east of Hartford. The median household income is $49,000, which is a little above the national average but below the state average. "These aren't some guys sitting around on their yachts," notes Tom Breen, a reporter at Manchester's Journal Inquirer.

The chairman of the Manchester Democratic Town Committee, 82-year-old Ted Cummings, is also a veteran of World War II; he has led the party there for 44 years -- longer than any other chairman in the state. Manchester's Democrats have traditionally been moderate, he says, but lately they've been critical of the Patriot Act and of the Bush Administration's failed attempt to privatize Social Security. Like Rafala, Cummings once supported Lieberman, but now he is fed up.

"Lieberman doesn't speak about the fundamental and most critical problems in nation-building," Cummings says. "People are asking, 'What side is he on?'"


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Kiss of Death!
Posted by: Ottomatic on Jan 16, 2006 5:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lieber-whore!
Got the kiss of Death!
From the Godfather!
BU__! SH__!
At the State of Disunion Address.

He backed the War Mongers!
Oil Barons!
And
Old Political Hacks.
Who spoke a lot about freedom
While spying on us!
Behind our backs.

Yes he backed the looting of the Treasury!
And
Raiding of Social Security!

They just stole another:
Ninety thousand million dollars!
For the RICH!
Tax cuts for Billionaires!

Debt for you.
Everyone pays for their GREED!
Every time you fill up!
Or
Borrow a Nickel!
From the bank!

Time to get the Politicians out of Politics.
They are Divisive and Corrupt.

Poor Mexico has a health care system.
France has a 35 hour work week and
A livable wage.

But we got Iraq.
We got War!

Don’t say nothing!
Don’t say a thing.
No money for education.
No money for anything!

No money for Health Care.
No jobs.
Privatize everything.
No Country!
Just a Parasitical Corporate:
STUPID STATE!

Where everyone is so,
Sick, Drugged and Brain-Washed,
That they:
Don’t know a thing.

God Bless Americo!

We got War!
We Got WAR!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Kiss of Death! Posted by: unite
» We got WAR! Posted by: Ottomatic
Its all part of the bigger picture!
Posted by: Pepper on Jan 16, 2006 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't say why the dems are doing this, I could only speculate and that is a useless exercise, but at least we can acknowledge this is happening all over the dem party, not just Joe Liberman.

WE have to take a look at all of them. They and we are all responsible if this country goes down the tubes. We have no one to blame but ourselves for our pathetic responses to major historical desertions by us all from the fight to save and maintain our Constitutional republic. This is unprecedented abandonment of our legacy paid for with the blood, lives and body parts of our ancestors. We should be heartily ashamed. I know I am. I can't see the course of action we should be taking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dump political Parties, Dump JoePolitico -- web-wreck ALL wussies
Posted by: Meremark on Jan 16, 2006 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
------------
Wayne MADSEN Wayne MADSEN --- Wayne-mentum -- Wayne MADSEN Wayne MADSEN
Independent testimony for the ex-NSA civil-defense genius and his website, detailing the Bush Crime Family death dining and Joe Traitormann's crumbs under that table.
HellOOO ... / Prescott Bush / connecticut / Joe Sold-Soul Sad-Sack /
Political Parties are the corruption of voting. Elect IMPEACHERS in the bleachers. DubyaDubyaDubya(dot)JAIL

And to quote from Wayne Madsen Report(dot)com:

January 13, 2006 -- What does Samuel Alito's "Unitary Executive," with presidential signing statements, look like? [nuremberg.jpg (32392 bytes)]

Democrats running for Congress must be forced to sign an election manifesto pledging to impeach Alito from the Supreme Court for lying to Congress under oath, a crime. They must also pledge to impeach Bush, Cheney, and other cabinet officers who have committed crimes. If people like Hillary Clinton, Dianne Feinstein, and Joe Lieberman refuse to sign, they should be challenged in their primaries and dumped from the November slate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Primary-Schrimary
Posted by: AlanSmithee on Jan 16, 2006 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mounting primary challanges in either major party is an exercise in pointlessness. An Independent challange is the only way punt Tailgunner Joe out of office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DUMP JOE
Posted by: krose on Jan 16, 2006 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DUMP DOE AND ALL THE OTHER WIMP DEMS who would destroy us and our party! I wish that I lived in Connecticut, so that I could use my energy and my vote to help banish him! He should join the Bush Administration and the rePUKE party! He is an INSULT to our party!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DUMP JOE Posted by: cmorr176
An original whiner/whinger
Posted by: goldennugget on Jan 16, 2006 6:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lieberman makes me cringe. His whingeing is like the fingernail down the chalkboard; the content is like a knife in the ribs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

no surprise
Posted by: ng1944 on Jan 16, 2006 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this is where zionism joins fascism

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: no surprise Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: no surprise Posted by: zipper696
i DO live in ct
Posted by: whoopingcrone on Jan 16, 2006 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and i was ready to dump joe the last time he ran.
As i told him, when he asked me for money,
"i will neither vote for nor support in any other way,
anyone who endorsed the u.s. attacking iraq."

I'd put up a "Joe's Gotta Go" sign, but in my town,
it's against the law to put up political signs except
when "they" say you can!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: i DO live in ct Posted by: A. James
COURAGE
Posted by: picket on Jan 16, 2006 9:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Joe Rafala, Manchester,Ct party worker, has shown some COURAGE.

Next....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: COURAGE Posted by: aonghus36
clinker
Posted by: cottontail on Jan 16, 2006 9:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suppose the folks in Connecticut are semi-comatose as are the folks in most states as they keep re-electing this snake oil salesman. Until federal elections are financed by tax dollars, Congress will continue to be hip deep in corruption and working people will continue to get the shaft.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: clinker Posted by: robchapman
rover
Posted by: Roverton on Jan 16, 2006 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A religion does not make one infallable to greed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: rover Posted by: aonghus36
Crummy
Posted by: Xynyx on Jan 16, 2006 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please boot him this year. PLEASE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

With Democrats like these...
Posted by: Calybos on Jan 16, 2006 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...who needs Republicans?

Seriously. Joe Lieberman has nothing in common with mainstream Democratic citizens, still less with the antiwar left and progressives who need to retake the party. He's never met a weapons system he didn't like, or a war he didn't vote for.

He may fit into the wheeling-and-dealing of other Democratic officials in Washington--but that's why they're so out of touch with the real, liberal and Democratic voters in the rest of the country.

Liberman's a "Democrat" to about the same degree Zell Miller is. We need fewer Lieberman compromisers and more Howard Dean-like hellraisers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No way ya can't dump Sen. Joseph Lieberman , yet and i am from CT
Posted by: Stealthdragoon on Jan 16, 2006 9:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Connecticut is not ready to dump Sen.Joseph Lieberman yet because he is too powerful in CT and if they did try dump Joseph Lieberman, you may end up having atty gen, Richard blumenthal running to replace Sen. Joseph Lieberman and Sen Joseph Lieberman may end up being Govoner of Connecticut. The thing with Sen.Joseph Lieberman is that he's a powerful senator in CT and anyone who tries running against him will get beaten up in the election in Connecticut. I have seen challengers try and toppel Sen. Joseph Lieberman , but they get beaten up come election day because sen.Joseph Lieberman has many friends in CT in high and low places who will ensure he stay in washington for a very long time. So the chances of replaceing sen. Joseph Lieberman are far remote because he's too powerful to replace and the people of Connecticut like him in washington.

Here's a bit of rumors from Connecticut politics, Former gov Lowell wicker has made his intentions of running againt Sen. Joseph Lieberman, but as any Ct resident will tell you, the chances of former Gov Lowell Wicker going to washington as a senator is next to nothing because no one will ever vote for a man who insitituted the state imcome tax and has made enemies to the state unions, towns and organizations. So i wouldn't bet the dems would try to put someone against Sen. Joseph Lieberman because he'll just wipe out the challanger. I also expect that Gov jodi rell will stay their too because she's too popular and she's cleaned house in the state.

A little history about sen. Joseph Lieberman before he became a powerful senator from Connecticut, he was a state senator and the Attorney General under Gov Ella Grasso's and thomas meskill reign.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not until 2012
Posted by: Dave in Northridge on Jan 16, 2006 10:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm holding my nose while I type this with my other hand, but really, as much as I loathe the fact Lieberman claims to be a Democrat, we can't do ANYTHING to risk the seat until we take back the Senate. I know I'm watching from the other coast, but as long as he votes with us on domestic issues, he can go on being a senator from Connecticut and the senator from Jerusalem (and before you go off on that, yes, I' m Jewish) for one more term.

Once we have a Democratic governor of Connecticut again, THEN you can add him to your "die soon" prayers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not until 2012 Posted by: krose
» RE: Not until 2012 Posted by: unite
» RE: Not until 2012 Posted by: Mike Turnauer, Vancouver,WA
Dump Lieberman
Posted by: robchapman on Jan 16, 2006 10:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lieberman has been consistent in his stand on Iraq. He is in office now because huge majorities in the Nutmeg State agree with him and have stood by him in his positions that exceed even Cheney in their intransigence toward Saddam and the Iraqi Baathists.

Lieberman supported the drive on Baghdad in Gulf War I even after Cheney, as Secreatary of Defense, backed off and left tens of thousands of Shiites to be slaughtered by the Republican Guard.

It is our duty as peace activists to demonstrate to the undecided that peaceful engagement will be more effective in democtratizing the middle east AND PROVIDING MODERATE PEACEFUL GOVERNMENTS there than the military options Senators like Lieberman support. I find it difficult to understand the desire to punish those who disagree with us.

Joe Lieberman provides moderate to conservative Democrats a leadership voice in Party councils and has earned our respect and loyalty through his work on our behalf. Progressives and liberals must understand that we will never be able govern without the moderate/conservative wing of our party.

Lieberman's support of the war can be offset by Nutmeg State Democrats working with Senator Dodd, who probably would be willing to take an anti-war position.

Joe Lieberman deserves our support for numerous reasons and for his continued loyalty to us. His war vote can be negated by working with Senator Dodd and his ability to attract sensible moderates is essential. It is time for Progressives and liberals to show their willingness to be responsible and to their ambition to govern and to make our coalition as broad and as inclusive as possible.

Robert Chapman
Lansing, New York

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dump Lieberman Posted by: krose
» RE: Dump Lieberman Posted by: crusty
» RE: Dump Lieberman Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Dump Lieberman Posted by: Pepper
» RE: Dump Lieberman Posted by: cottontail
» RE: Dump Lieberman Posted by: zipper696
Time to dump pro-Bush Democrats
Posted by: steves on Jan 16, 2006 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could we please, please get rid of Tom Lantos too? The famous promoter and author of the Kuwait incubator fraud should have been tossed out a decade ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Joe
Posted by: dphel on Jan 16, 2006 1:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lieberman's first allegiance is to Israel, then to the US and then
thirdly to his state. Joe supports the war because he thinks our war protects Israel. He doesn't care how many American kids get killed, he's an Israel agent. He's a neocon. He has blood on his hands.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Joe Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Joe Posted by: Grouchoman
» RE: Joe Posted by: cottontail
» RE: Joe Posted by: zipper696