Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Not Proud to Be an American

By Molly Ivins, AlterNet. Posted January 10, 2006.


Abramoff and DeLay used nonprofit organizations to launder money and pay for high-flying perks. That's just Bad Taste.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Molly Ivins

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

We live in a great nation. The police blotter of the Mill Valley Herald in California informs us that the constabulary there had to be called out on account of a citizen "dressed like a penguin" who was "standing on a street corner playing a ukulele." Makes me proud to be an American.

What does not make me proud to be an American is a specific twist in the Jack Abramoff-Tom DeLay scandal -- in fact, this makes me want to urp despite the fact that I have a strong stomach when it comes to political corruption. Practice, practice, practice, that's what Texas provides when it comes to sleaze and stink. Who can forget such great explanations as "Well, I'll just make a little bit of money, I won't make a whole lot"? And "There was never a Bible in the room"?

But this is a reach too far, just that little extra that takes normal putrid corruption and moves it to the ranks of "Excuse me, I have to throw up." Both Abramoff and DeLay and many of their web of colleagues have consistently used nonprofit organizations ostensibly formed for charitable purposes to launder money, to move peculiar proceeds and to pay for high-flying perks. Come on, guys, give us a break -- if you're going to make a mockery of democracy and show your mastery at flipping money, wiring the system and fixing the odds -- please don't use charitable organizations designed to help crippled children to do it. That's Bad Taste.

According to the Associated Press, Tom DeLay,

"visited cliff-top Caribbean resorts, golf courses designed by PGA champions and four-star restaurants, all courtesy of donors who bankrolled his political empire. "Over the past six years, the former House majority leader and his associates have visited places of luxury most Americans have never seen, often getting there aboard corporate jets arranged by lobbyists and other special interests.

"Public documents reviewed by the Associated Press tell the story: at least 48 visits to golf clubs and resorts with lush fairways, 100 flights aboard company planes, 200 stays at hotels, many world-class, and 500 meals at restaurants, some averaging nearly $200 for a dinner for two.

"Instead of his personal expense, the meals and trips for DeLay and his associates were paid with donations collected by the campaign committees, political action committees and children's charity the Texas Republican created during his rise to the top of Congress."

How cynical does that make you? When I hear Speaker Dennis Hastert is returning his campaign contributions from Jack Abramoff or "donating it to charity," I wonder which little charmer of a Republican campaign fund masquerading as a charity he's sending it to.

The DeLay Foundation for Kids was set up 18 years ago and works on behalf of foster children. But it is also a way for companies to give unregulated and undisclosed funds: It's a way for companies to get into DeLay's good graces or, as Fred Lewis from Campaign for People says, "another way for donors to get their hooks into politicians."

Meanwhile, Abramoff was even more cavalier about "charity." He created the Capital Athletic Foundation supposedly to help inner-city children through organized sports. There is no evidence any of the money ever went to that purpose, but the Washington Post reports it went to a sniper school for Israelis on the West Bank, a golf trip to Scotland for Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio, and a Jewish religious academy in Columbia, Md. Abramoff's hapless Indian clients were generous contributors: I wonder if he thought it was funny that Indians would more likely identify with Palestinians than Israelis.

Believe it or not, there are nonprofit organizations in this country where the CEO barely makes more than the janitor, where nickels and pennies are saved so the clients or the cause can get a little more. There are nonprofits where good and faithful servants have spent decades devoting their entire lives to helping those less fortunate than themselves -- without ever going to a cliff-top Caribbean resort. There are nonprofits where extra-bright young people from top schools work for peanuts because they want to make a better world. While Jack Abramoff padded his bills and falsified expenses to tribal clients, there are people who work for minimum wages on Indian reservations to help some of the poorest people in America get a minimally decent chance at life.

Abramoff and DeLay and their crummy hangers-on haven't just cheated and lied. They have dishonored the work of many, many people who are devoted to helping others without even expecting a decent salary for it.

Digg!

Molly Ivins writes about politics, Texas and other bizarre happenings.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What's really sickening!
Posted by: johnecolby on Jan 10, 2006 2:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It makes my stomach turn that there isn't a huge outcry over their open corruption, their wiping their crap in our faces. It's time for them to pay the bill for their (mis)deeds. Make the whole bunch of them and all their henchpeople rot in some stinking prison cell where the food is really bad and there are no golf courses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is this not the American Way?
Posted by: Ely Whitney on Jan 10, 2006 4:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have to say I view this as true to the words, Made in America spirit.

While there are those in other countries who are also as deviant when it comes to conning the masses, this is a shining example of how industrious Americans can be when it comes to gaining wealth and power at all cost.

For every one person who finds this to be outrageous I dare say there are probably two who wish they were in such a position to take such liberties. This is truely a sad state of what America has become.

That silent outcry you hear is the majority of Americans lauding the true American entrepreneurial spirit...GREED

Personally I would like a list of those organizations who dedicate time and energies to making this a better society not for riches but for the sake of all us. It is time we start channeling our donations to ward those groups.

one mans opinion...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Is this not the American Way? Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: Is this not the American Way? Posted by: fdr_vindicated
Great points but that shouldn't stop you from being an American
Posted by: NDnative on Jan 10, 2006 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's just that the neocons on the right have redefined the meaning of being an American for the past 36 years. If I were you Molly, I'd focus on taking back the true meaning of being American rather than give up like that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poor CEOs?
Posted by: cellis56 on Jan 10, 2006 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I worked for the American Cancer Society thirty five years ago and watched as a trust fund that was specifically set up to be dispersed within ten years in a search for a "cure" was nursed along by doling out tiny grants to "junior researchers." When the trust fund expired and the fund has increased in value, the courts extended the deadline, allotting an inconceivably generous amount of time for expending the funds. I doubt they were ever in fact spent.

I was also aware that hanky panky with cancer funds was played by the board, perhaps by investing the money in their own corporations. At any rate, the idea of ripping off people through heart-warming charities is not new. I don't know what, if anything, the ACS does for cancer victims now but then they did little more than provide transportation to radiation therapy. I have never heard of their sponsoring a single major breakthrough in research.

Therefore I am dubious about the number of charitable organizations that actually put their funds into their work and not into the pockets of their board members.

Abramoff and Delay are egregious examples of American greed but they are mere examples even so. Their pursuit of pleasure, power, and riches represents the logical evolution of American individualism. We literally step over the languishing bodies of our poor and figuratively step over the world's poor as we crowd into bargain sales, snatching up workmanship that was not adequately compensated. We all feed at the greed trough, I'm afraid. It is the American Way.

I hope Abramoff, Delay, Bush, and Hillary Clinton (another of Abramoff's recipients who recently donated HER take to god knows what charity) all go down in flames. But nothing will change until we begin to examine the ethos that has corrupted each of us so that we feel little beyond the urge to buy and accumulate and teach our children to buy and accumulate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Poor CEOs? Posted by: wendym
» RE: Poor CEOs? Posted by: cellis56
» RE: Poor CEOs? Posted by: mrsmagoo
» RE: Poor CEOs? Posted by: ttmrichter
Clarification
Posted by: cellis56 on Jan 10, 2006 8:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry. I didn't mean to imply there are NONE. I simply mean that I am sure that the big ones are scams. Ironically, the ones that get the most publicity and are generally regarded by the public as most deserving.

I'm sure the outfit you work for is ethical and there are plenty of others. Just not the ones most people know and/or read about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Clarification Posted by: jaebi
Lock 'em up and throw away the key
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 10, 2006 8:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Abramoff's scams sound a lot like how the Mafia used to run their protection rackets. And considering how the Mob has infiltrated the indian gaming industry, and how the Republicans have now done the same thing, I wonder how much of what indians contributed to Abramoff-Delay was for direct influence, and how much they were forced to "contribute" for Mob influence?

Molly's right; what Abramoff and Delay have done is orders of magnitude more cruel than murdering a blind kid to steal his cup of pencils – and we put people away for life for crimes like that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For God's Sake
Posted by: Rick on Jan 10, 2006 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember, Abramoff and especially Tom Delay are outspoken in their "deeply held religious faith" and values. I believe Delay has, more than a few times, expressed that he is doing God's work in all things political and that anyone who questions his motives, tactics, or ends is persecuting him for being either or both a "Christian" and Republican. Considering the kind of stuff he's been found out to have done (and the rest we don't know about yet), Tom Delay had better put his hope in the forgivness of sins.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Delay will probably get re-elected
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Jan 10, 2006 8:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It will interesting to see what Texas voters do with Delay's next election. Remember Rosty? How'd that mantra go? Hell yes, he's a crook, but he's OUR crook. There were plenty of people in other districts that were eager to hand him his hat, but his own constituents supported him like he were from the same mold as Proxmeyer or Wellstone.

The rest of the nation may want Delay behind bars, but if Texans want him in charge of Fort Knox we're all stuck with him. And, besides, why would fund managers, etc., feel particularly constrained to hold themselves to a higher standard than our civic leaders? Sometimes it seems as though you could trample over sick babies as you climb to the top and still be the guest of honor if you manage to rake in a big enough fortune.

As long as you're throwing money around, you'll be at the center of a crowd. A crowd of true and loyal friends, no doubt - loyal 'til the money runs out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gluttony
Posted by: Skipper on Jan 10, 2006 9:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gluttony. That's what it's called. May they split a gut. Why didn't it occur to anybody to just give it back to the Indians? Were they afraid of an uprising?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Gluttony Posted by: jwg
» RE: Gluttony Posted by: cacky
» RE: Gluttony Posted by: cacky
clinker
Posted by: cottontail on Jan 10, 2006 10:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're one of my heroes, Molly, but I must correct you. You started by saying "we live in a great nation." I say we live in what was once a great nation, and in my opinion there's no going back. I wear a button that says "nation of sheep, ruled by wolves, owned by pigs." There's no way ordinary people, if they were even interested, can wrest control of the country and the government from corporate America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: clinker Posted by: mistery509
» RE: clinker Posted by: starvinmarvy
» gramps Posted by: gramps
» Gramps Posted by: gramps
» RE: clinker Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: clinker Posted by: Lizka
A Society of Satanists
Posted by: antrykar on Jan 10, 2006 10:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There were several posts above that discussed the failing of America's "moral compass." It was even pointed out that while America is deemed a "Christian Nation" by its citizens, we are anything but. I contend that our nation has fallen into that of being "Satanist."

Most people believe that term means "one that worships the Devil" or some other - most-likely fictional - entity, the true meaning of being a "Satanist" is that you look out only for yourself. All others be damned as long as you get yours.

How can anyone alive and with any amount of intelligence look at our society and see it as anything else? I'm not saying there are no benevolent people in this country. It's just that - on the whole - people in the States are far too concerned with getting their next, new, shiny automobile or adding to their DVD collection to really care one way or another about anything that actually matters.

Until we are ready to take a serious look at ourselves as individuals and admit that we are one of the most selfish societies to ever exist (I'm not saying we're the worst, just one of them), there can never be any real change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Society of Satanists Posted by: Roverton
tender stomachs
Posted by: saywhat? on Jan 10, 2006 10:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i know what it is like to want to regurgitate unseemly psychological contents, and instead: out comes food.

This scandal IS mob crime. Include the 'made in america" scam in saipan where women are having forced abortions in the name of fashion.

Come on Delay, stand for something, even if it is some right wing thought that may spawn another episode of uncontrolled heaves!

What makes me not proud to be an american is not only the criminal behavior of these guys, but the apathy with which we as a society accept. Every american should live in a third world country for a year. It is astonishing how we have taken over, yet given very litle back to other nations. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand why we are admonished in the world today. This hurts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: tender stomachs Posted by: Jeff G
Would Uncle Joe help? ...
Posted by: barbatus on Jan 10, 2006 12:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... or, rather, his methods? Just round up and summarily execute politicians and bureaucrats every other year ... or, if you think it's too cruel, send 'em to dig holes somewhere in Alaskan wilderness (dodn't they want to drill oil wells there, anyway?).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'll settle for anal rape in prison and total asset confiscation
Posted by: truthteller on Jan 10, 2006 1:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tom and Jack (and the equally evil casts from Enron, WorldCom, et. al.) deserve, and should get HARD time, not Club Fed, no Camp Cupcake-like place for them. It's not so much the length of sentence that's important, but the need for totally humiliation that will send a message to others so tempted. Having to spend time in stir, and be the "wife" to some big, sweaty guy named Bubba should only be the beginning for these sociopaths. (Hey, one of the biggest applause lines in "Animal House" was the future for the preppy Omega Frat Prez. Gregg: "Aide to President Nixon, raped in prison, 1974")

They should also, more importantly, be left totally PENNILESS as a result of their conduct. ALL of their assets should be confiscated and given back to their victims, including the taxpayers through the government. Money, after all, is the most important thing to them. They should have thought about their families before they did the deed. They need to have to live in the poverty they caused their victims to find themselves in. I don't care if it's a cold-water flat in Harlem, or a trailer in Appalachia, they should be left without anything for their crimes.

I'm all about afflicting the comfortable!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes, Molly, but....
Posted by: bookwoman on Jan 10, 2006 2:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't it great that Abramoff is finally going to get his and DeLay may get his and, if we are really lucky some enterprising young reporter will start digging up things about Grover Norquist. Let's begin by asking how he thinks FEMA is doing now that it has drowned in the New Orleans basin.

At any rate, all you prosecutors and reporters out there, onward and upward or maybe in this situation onward and downward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Molly, cut it out
Posted by: vespasian01 on Jan 10, 2006 3:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've got enough trouble as it is, not to mention 10-to-12 years of redhiney at the Agnew Wing over at Three Rivers.

Thanks, T.Delay

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Proud to be an American
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jan 10, 2006 4:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I haven't been a proud American since George Bushit was "selected", there is no underestimating the STUPIDITY OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mythbuster
Posted by: mythbuster on Jan 10, 2006 4:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Problem is, this is the American way. DeLay is just the latest politician to drop the mask and reveal just how sordid the ways of power are. Of course, his phony Christianity--another crime, but the way--is his special nuance. The Republicans have done us a favor. It's time to start a national 12-step program Let's begin with honesty: DeLay was the majority leader. DeLay is who we really are: A mean-spirited, ethnocentric people who prey on the weak and worship the strong. But we talk a good game. It's our gift. As De Gaulle would say, hypocrisy is the cardinal trait of Anglo-Saxon culture. And I know the truth of that as only a Anglo-Saxon can....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Animal Farm Congress
Posted by: Linda on Jan 10, 2006 5:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with "Clinker"! The top "Pig" in this Animal Farm Congress is Rep. DeLay; but an even bigger Piggie is in the White House:
Pres. Bush has his "Office of Faith-Based Initiatives". He hands over "grants" of taxpayer dollars to right-wing fundamentalist type evangelical "mega-churches" & people like TV nut-o-vangelista the"Rev." Pat Screaming Loony Robertson.
They in return, hold "Justice Sundays" for Bush & Repubs., & "launder" said taxpayers $$$ -- then return a "kickback" of a portion of that $$$ to, guess who?
Yes! To Bush's campaign coffers, & to Repub. congressional campaign coffers, in form of campaign contributions!!

What a truly cozy, ingenious racket. I am in awe of the Piggies in Washington, D.C. Sen. McCain is a rarity, a fairly honest politician & congressman. Not a "Piggie".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Animal Farm Congress Posted by: cacky
» RE: Animal Farm Congress Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: Animal Farm Congress Posted by: Lizka
didn't make it up
Posted by: cacky on Jan 10, 2006 8:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regarding my reply to the previous post that mentioned the Office of Faith Based Initiatives....
I read the first story in The Oregonian or on Alternet, can't remember.
The story about the second church appeared in USA Today less than a week ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Small Beginning
Posted by: whyoung on Jan 10, 2006 10:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vote NO for incumbents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

small and trivial
Posted by: Patrissimo on Jan 11, 2006 1:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amongst these, and other monumental discrepanciesand scandal; it's good to know that they are divertable and defensable when compared to perjury about a mutual sexual dalliance between consenting adults.(Even though inappropriate should only be in civil court by one of the injured parties.This, of course,not being the case since neither filed,or even claimed injury.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

free one-way ticket
Posted by: tomcat on Jan 11, 2006 5:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Molly, pick the country that you want to emigrate to -permanently. I'll buy your one-way ticket. But you have to agree to write a column about why you are proud to live in your new homeland and how it is superior to the crappy old USA. I'm holding my breath...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: free one-way ticket Posted by: Dejaview
» RE: free one-way ticket Posted by: tomcat
» RE: free one-way ticket Posted by: cacky
» RE: free one-way ticket Posted by: tomcat
» RE: free one-way ticket Posted by: cellophane man
» RE: free one-way ticket Posted by: truthteller
» RE: free one-way ticket Posted by: tomcat
» RE: free one-way ticket Posted by: marymad
» RE: free one-way ticket Posted by: cellophane man
» RE: free one-way ticket Posted by: cellophane man
» RE: free one-way ticket Posted by: Lizka
» RE: free one-way ticket Posted by: cellophane man
» RE: free one-way ticket Posted by: FrozenFox
texas voter
Posted by: fuzypupy on Jan 12, 2006 5:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
since tommy boy and others forced thru the redistrict maps he is likely to be reelected as you say, especially when the local news channels play his tune without investigating and reporting any truths or counter opinions. they recently showed an ad on the news channel against tom delay and said they would not accept the ad for airing on their station, they also said it was from a liberal special interest group , they also said in its present form but we know what that means, they were too lazy or just not interested enough to dispute with facts that the ad was misleading or false

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pattti_s.
Posted by: patti_s on Jan 15, 2006 10:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would feel much better about the whole scandal if the polititians were giving the money back to the Indian tribes. They were the ones swindled out of it. I agree that none of us will ever know if the recipient charities are reputable or just a way of hiding the money until it's safe to retrieve it. Does anyone know of a list naming these "charities"? patti_s.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: pattti_s. Posted by: Just Us
patti_s.
Posted by: patti_s on Jan 15, 2006 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How does a person become a tribal chieftain? Is it an hereditary position? Is the chieftain elected? Maybe a good private eye is what you need, or maybe a grassroots revolt against the current chieftain. I don't know much about how the law is written or how the tribes run themselves, but it seems like there should be a discrimination case here somewhere. If so, hurry! Alito will be on the court soon. patti_s.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: patti_s. Posted by: Just Us
Abramoff 's Jewishness
Posted by: blanca on Jan 16, 2006 11:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's interesting to note that Jack Abramoff claimed to experience a Jewish version of the Christian "born again" experience. He saw himself as some kind of hero protecting Israel. Please also note that he made many comments showing clear racial contempt for his American Indian clients. Is this what he learned from the Holocaust? Become more like the Nazis and kick the "inferior" people around?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]