Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The GOP Corruption Machine

By Katrina vanden Heuvel, TheNation.com. Posted January 6, 2006.


The corruption doesn't just stem from Abramoff and cronies, but from virtually every level of the Republican-dominated Congress.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Katrina vanden Heuvel

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

It didn't take Republican super-lobbyist Jack Abramoff's guilty plea to three felony counts of conspiracy, mail fraud and tax evasion to understand that the scale of corruption in the GOP-dominated Congress had risen to obscene heights. But it sure helps expose the cesspool of corruption in that GOP-dominated Congress.

"When this is all over, this will be bigger than [any government scandal] in the last 50 years, both in the amount of people involved and the breadth to it," Stan Brand, a former U.S. House counsel who specializes in representing public officials accused of wrongdoing, told Bloomberg News. "It will include high-ranking members of Congress and executive branch officials."

But what is to be done? Take a lesson from the good Senator from Wisconsin, Russ Feingold, who last July launched a crackdown on government corruption.

In July, the tough-minded reformer, who with John McCain led the fight for passage of campaign finance reform, introduced the Lobbying and Ethics Reform Act in the Senate (Representative Martin Meehan (D, MA) has similar legislation pending in the House).

The bill's key provisions are designed to reduce the power of special interests by forcing lobbyists to file disclosure reports quarterly instead of twice a year, prohibiting lobbyists from taking trips with members of Congress and their staffs, and requiring former members of Congress and some senior executive branch officials to wait two years after leaving government service before working as a lobbyist. And, as Feingold told The Hill, the bill would prohibit "lobbyists from giving gifts to members" or staff and require "members and campaigns to reimburse the owners of corporate jets at the charter rate when they use those planes for their official or political travel."

Such a law -- and even hardcore DC cynics may want to give it a better chance of passage after the Abramoff scandal winds its way through DC -- -would arrive just barely in the nick of time. The Center for Public Integrity published a must-read study last April showing that lobbyists have spent almost $13 billion since 1998 seeking to influence federal legislation and federal regulations. "Our report reveals that each year since 1998 the amount spent to influence federal lawmakers is double the amount of money spent to elect them," the Center's executive director, Roberta Baskin, pointed out.

Other findings are equally heart-stopping. More than 2,000 lobbyists in Washington had previously held senior government jobs, and in the past six years, "49 out of the 50 top lobbying firms failed to file one or more required forms." According to other reports that the Center recently put out, some 650 foreign companies are lobbying the federal government on issues important to them, and spent more than an estimated $3 billion to influence decision-making at the federal level in 2004.

But we need to look beyond the numbers, and understand what happened in 1995 when the GOP launched its infamous K Street Project, to really understand why the corruption has metastasized with such velocity. That was the beginning of the push to put "conservative activist Republicans on K Street," as Americans for Tax Reform president Grover Norquist told journalist Elizabeth Drew -- a concerted effort to install ideological comrades-in-arms who could steer money to the GOP, promote conservative causes in Washington and keep Republicans in power for years to come.


Digg!

Katrina vanden Heuvel is editor of The Nation.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
There is where all the money for wages is going!
Posted by: owlbear1 on Jan 6, 2006 1:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lobbying Congress for more tax breaks for the rich...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bravo Democrats
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Jan 6, 2006 4:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reform of the lobbying laws and campaign finance laws are long past due. However, it strikes me as odd that reformers are always members of the party out of power. When the Democrats were in control they didn't push for these reforms. And neither did the Republicans. A cynical person might conclude that when the congress is more or less evenly split, the parties are contentedly sharing the spoils. And when the congress is lopsided reform is a last ditch effort to get back into power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Republican rider weakens organic standards
Posted by: organicmatters on Jan 6, 2006 7:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On November 1st 2005, in a preemptive ploy designed to by-pass Congressional scrutiny, conference committee Republicans affixed a rider onto the Fiscal Year 2006 Agricultural Appropriations bill that alters provisions of the 15 year old Organic Farming Production Act (OFPA) and weakens organic standards. In the back-door deal, the special-interest legislation was inserted without debate or vote after the meeting was adjourned and the committee Democrats were no longer present. The tacked-on rider pointedly overturns a recent Appellate Court decision affirming OFPA’s fundamental ban on using synthetic substances in organic foods and rewrites other portions of the organic law.

OTA was represented by attorney/lobbyists from Covington & Burling who specialize in fixing biotechnology and other agribusiness "life sciences" regulatory issues. So far, no one has been able to pinpoint "who done it" -- the actual conference committee Senator or Representative who attached the rider. Any leads out there in alternetland?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WEB SITE
Posted by: krose on Jan 6, 2006 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WEB SITE FOR THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY

I saw it on C-SPAN'S WASHINGTON JOURNAL this morning.
This site goes into detail about all of the lobbying statistics through 2004.

www.publicintegrity.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gathaiga
Posted by: gathaiga on Jan 6, 2006 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CRACKDOWN ON CORRUPTION? WHEN DO WE START? CORRUPTION PERMEATES GOVERNMENT AND OCCASSIONALLY A FEW OF THE BIGGER FISH ARE CAUGHT. THE SMALLER FISH WHO ACQUIRE A FEW THOUSAND ILLEGALLY OR UNETHICALLY...OR WHO DON'T FILE THIS OR THAT FORM... JUST SNEAK INTO A CORNER UNTIL THE HEAT PASSES. THE TOTAL OF ALL THESE INDIVIDUALS MUST APPROACH THE LEVELS OF CRIMINALITY OF THE BIG FISH.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: gathaiga Posted by: george233
End all corruption
Posted by: chaoslegs on Jan 6, 2006 9:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The steps advocated by Feingold are good and a nice step to really hamper the revolving door, especially the 2 year wait.

The article seems to say that only Republicans are corrupt/beholded to corporate interests, but that is misleading. Just look at the 20 some Democratic senators that voted for the bankruptcy bill. You got Biden in there, and how many credit card companies are based in Delaware. Or Lieberman who has always helped the financial industry.

You wait, I bet the Democratic Leadership Council, otherwise known as the Democrats Love Corporations (just made that up), will fight these reforms like they have fought Murtha on pulling out of Iraq.

The real difference with this corruption is the ruthlessness in which the Republicans have taken total control of Congress and prevented Dems from doing anything in the House because of House "rules."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: nd all corruption Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: nd all corruption Posted by: Lincoln fan
Here's a start
Posted by: jehill8 on Jan 6, 2006 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To start cleaning this whole mess up the laws need to be changed so that only "natural persons" who may legally cast a vote in a given election are the only ones who may contribute financially to the candidates running in that election. If one can't vote in an election, one should not be able to contribute to the campaigns; that goes for corporations, unions, trade groups, non-profits, politicians, individuals, blahblahblah. Additionally, there should be a $2000 limit on contributions to candidates per campaign - whether they are running for local mayor or US Senator - and leftover campaign cash goes to the charity of their choice.
(I thought with all the charity I'm seeing in DC this week they could get on board with this item for sure)

As long as corporations continue to enjoy the rights of human beings things will never change and will continue to get worse. Corporate personage is the underpinning of this problem - by asserting their "personhood" they are entitled to "free speech", and therefore, entitled to financially support politicians of their choosing even though they can't vote. Here in Texas, politicians can't use corporate money for campaigns, but they can use it for "administration purposes".
I hope the irony of that is clear.

President Herbert Hoover said in 1928, "You have to stand every day hours of visitors. Nine-tenths of them want something they ought not have." Back then at least they had one in ten who were deserving - we couldn't touch that today.
J

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT"S SO DAMNED SIMPLE!! NOBODY SEEMS TO GET IT!!!
Posted by: Againstthewindwalking on Jan 6, 2006 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sick of the way the Repugs have run roughshod over the working people of this country? TURN THE BASTARDS OUT!!!! Sick of the way the Democrats seem to have lost their balls when it comes to standing up for OUR rights? TURN THE BASTARDS OUT!!

Hillary Clinton, Dean, and the rest; Want my vote? ('Cause vote by God I do!!) SHOW ME SOMETHING!! I don't mean the same old buzzwords and gumflapping! THIS COUNTRY IS FUCKED!! HOW ARE WE GOING TO FIX IT??!!! Give me a clear, concise plan of action!

Don't hem and haw and shuffle about! STAND THE HELL UP AND TALK LIKE YOU"VE GOT SOMETHING TO SAY!! Answer our questions and BE HONEST!! If You don't know, say you don't know! None of us know! That's why we need you to tell us what your plan of action is! Listen to the people, damn it and lock those damned ass-kissers and lobyists out of your offices! They didn't put you in those offices! WE DID! And if you don't get off your collective asses and show us something, we can put you out of them, too!

Keep your gladhands to yourself! And if you try to kiss my granddaughter, she'll steal your glasses and stick her finger in your eye! You've been warned!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Plea bargain with a strong campaign finance law, and...
Posted by: Sojourner on Jan 6, 2006 2:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...votes for national health insurance, an end to the Iraq war, a vote to restore US participation in the World Court, an across the board income tax, and any other liberal-dream item we had no hope of ever getting until now.

God bless the regulators, the congressional investigators, and every-other anti-corruption agency in our democracy. After 35 years of being ridiculed and rebuffed, we now see how necessary it is for LIMITED government, which means limiting elected officials with their hands out for a handout as well as bureaucrats.

Why is it that everytime the GOP gets control they go crazy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now does massive election fraud seem more likely?
Posted by: Mein Bush on Jan 8, 2006 7:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's face it, the right wing freak show's policies are not that attractive. In order to win an election they need to...

1. Smear their opponents.
2. Lie about their true intentions.
3. Illegally funnel millions into their campaigns.
4. Spread falsehoods about the "mainstream liberal media".

And... if all that does work...

5. Engage in huge multifaceted election fraud.

Gore won in 2000! Kerry won in 2004! What's it going to take for people to wake up?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]