Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Eighties Surveillance Revival

By Peter Dale Scott, Pacific News Service. Posted January 5, 2006.


Illegal eavesdropping and detentions of U.S. citizens may have grown from a secret program in the 1980s that planned to suspend the U.S. Constitution in the event of a national emergency.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Peter Dale Scott

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Revelations that the National Security Agency (NSA) has engaged in warrantless eavesdropping in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act prompted President Bush to admit last month that in 2002 he directly authorized the activity in the wake of 9/11.

But there are reasons to suspect that the illegal eavesdropping, and the related program of illegal detentions of U.S. citizens as well as foreign nationals, began earlier. Both may be part of what Vice President Dick Cheney has called the Bush administration's restoration of "the legitimate authority of the presidency" -- practices exercised by Nixon that were outlawed after Watergate.

In the 1980s Richard Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld discussed just such emergency surveillance and detention powers in a super-secret program that planned for what was euphemistically called "Continuity of Government" (COG) in the event of a nuclear disaster.

At the time, Cheney was a Wyoming congressman, while Rumsfeld, who had been defense secretary under President Ford, was a businessman and CEO of the drug company G.D. Searle. Overall responsibility for the program had been assigned to Vice President George H.W. Bush, "with Lt. Col. Oliver North...as the National Security Council action officer," according to James Bamford in his book, "A Pretext for War."

These men planned for suspension of the Constitution, not just after nuclear attack, but for any "national security emergency," which they defined in Executive Order 12656 of 1988 as: "Any occurrence, including natural disaster, military attack, technological or other emergency, that seriously degrades or seriously threatens the national security of the United States." Clearly 9/11 would meet this definition.

As developed in the mid-1980s by Oliver North in the White House, the plans called for not just the surveillance but the potential detention of large numbers of American citizens. During the Iran-Contra hearings, North was asked about his work on "a contingency plan in the event of emergency, that would suspend the American constitution." The chairman, Democratic Senator Inouye, ruled that this was a "highly sensitive and classified" matter, not to be dealt with in an open hearing.

The supporting agency for the planning and implementation was the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). FEMA was headed for much of the 1980s by Louis Giuffrida, whose COG plans for massive detention became so extreme that even President Reagan's then Attorney General, William French Smith, raised objections.

Smith eventually left Washington, while COG continued to evolve. And in May 2001 Cheney and FEMA were reunited: President George W. Bush appointed Cheney to head a terrorism task force and created a new office within FEMA to assist him. In effect, Bush was authorizing a resumption of the kind of planning that Cheney and FEMA had conducted under the heading of COG.


Digg!

Peter Dale Scott is author of "Drugs, Oil, and War: The United States in Afghanistan, Colombia, and Indochina" (Rowman & Littlefield, 2003) and is completing a book on "Deep Politics and the Road to 9/11."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
BUSHITLER: FUHRER OF AMERIKA
Posted by: Bushhater on Jan 5, 2006 4:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush, in his own word, "running the government would be easier in a dictatorship, as long as I'm the dictator". They were NOT kidding. Bush also said that in response to an outbreak of bird-flu that he would "declare martial law". The administration has also hinted at postponing the Nov '04 election because of a "terrorist threat". The domestic spying on Quakers, peace activists, critics, and the detention of Jose Padilla(an American citizen, arrested on American soil) as an "enemy combatant" are, I believe are just precursers of what is in store for all of us before the '08 elections. This administration, will, I am sure will find an "emergency" by 2008 to rip up the Constitution, abolish the Bill of Rights, eliminate Congress, and establish "people's courts" ala Nazi Germany. Concentration camps will be set up for "disloyal" citizens, perhaps even gas chambers for anyone who is suspected of opposing them. Remember, Bush said that" you are either with us or against us". Alito seems to have no problem for unchecked executive power. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutley. WAKE UP AMERICA!!! WE ARE ON THE VERGE OF LIVING IN A FASCIST POLICE STATE LIKE NAZI GERMANY!!! Imagine, if you will, Ann Coulter, or her clone, deciding who is loyal or treasonous. This whole scenerio scares the hell out of me, so be afraid,l BE VERY AFRAID. If, what I suspect does come to pass, we MUST take up the gun and overthrow these fascist pigs. Restore the America we grew up in and love.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: BUSHITLER: FUHRER OF AMERIKA Posted by: paul_revere
» Insurrection anyone? Posted by: truthteller
» RE: Insurrection anyone? Posted by: kww355
1984
Posted by: I_Love_NY on Jan 6, 2006 11:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Guess Orwell wasn't to far off after all. These people are traitors to the United States. I can't believe for one minute that any one who calls themselves American is not outraged by Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and the rest of the cabal's actions. Impeach!!!

Making conservatives cringe since 1977

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop getting hysterical!
Posted by: charlief on Jan 7, 2006 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a European - living in New York for some years. In my much more radical past, I've been followed by our local political police, wiretapped by who the hell knows and watched. And I know I have a lengthy file held by my government for my affiliations with various radical organisations. And I mean radical in the European sense [not the watered-down, tepid American sense].

But, really... the stuff being described above as we're 'on the verge of...' in the US is adolescent, hysterical nonsense. Get a grip. Strong governments have been around since there have been governments. Suspension of habeus corpus has been used on and off since forever, practically.

Nothing lasts forever, they'll get their day. But please, if you're going to talk about 'going underground' and buying up automatic weapons to 'fight them back'. I'd suggest - from long years of experience and given recent stories in the NYT - I wouldn't be announcing it out in the open for all the world to read.

That is just plain dumb.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stop getting hysterical! Posted by: jenbeca