COMMENTS: 83
Give Miners Justice, Not the Shaft
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
According to NPR's Daniel Zwerdling, the company also has a record of very serious violations, including a "high degree of negligence," twice the average number of injuries, etc. The mine was forced to shut down 15 times in the last year alone.
Given the fact that the government rarely shuts down mines, this is off the scale.
If anything good could come out of a disaster like this, it should be to spur a broader debate about the inadequacy of corporate homicide law enforcement in the U.S. More so since Sago is no anomaly, but rather one of numerous major work-related accidents that have occurred in recent years.
Last March, for example, an explosion ripped through a Texas City refinery, killing 15 people and injuring 170. (BP leads the U.S. refinery industry in worker deaths with 22 fatalities in eight accidents since 1995. The oil giant was already on an OSHA "watch list" after a 2004 explosion killed two pipefitters.)
In September the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board announced an unprecedented workplace safety fine of $21 million. Big fines like that are rare for workplace disasters, although there have been a few in recent years. Last March, Motiva, an oil refinery owned by Shell Oil, pled guilty to negligently endangering workers and committing environmental crimes in Delaware. Motiva-Shell was prosecuted by the Delaware attorney general and ordered by a Delaware court to pay a $10 million fine and sentenced to three years' probation.
Before the BP and Motiva fines, the largest fine in the history of environmental and workplace safety enforcement was $11 million imposed on IMC Fertilizer, in Sterlington, La., in 1991 after an explosion killed eight workers and injured 128.
Nevertheless, the dollars paid in fines are usually just a fraction of a large corporation's annual revenues (in BP's case, an amount equal to what the company earns in two hours). As such, they constitute a mere slap-on-the-wrist as sanctions. Too often, the value of a corporation's stock rises upon the announcement of such settlements, because it means the uncertainty and adverse publicity resulting from the incident will diminish with time.
When it comes to workplace deaths, big accidents that get some news coverage like Sago are just the tip of the iceberg. According to government figures gathered by the AFL, nearly 6,000 or so workplace deaths each year (not to mention the 50,000 or so casualties of work-related diseases). But with the occasional exception of excellent investigative series like Mike Casey's series for the Kansas City Star, it rarely strikes us as a big problem. Until we are personally affected.
Although sometimes local prosecutors get riled up by these cases, it's rare that the feds crack down on this type of corporate crime. In December 2003 the Department of Justice indicted senior managers at a New Jersey foundry on charges of conspiring to violate safety and environmental laws and repeatedly obstructing government investigations into workplace dangers. The New Jersey foundry is owned by McWane Corp., the largest manufacturer of cast-iron pipes. The Department of Justice called it a pioneering indictment -- by using federal conspiracy statutes, they avoid the sentencing limitations under the OSHA misdemeanor rule. But indictments such as those issued against McWane executives are very rare. And it came on the heels of a major investigation by the New York Times.
Meanwhile, on the Hill, the West Virginia accident should give renewed impetus to the Wrongful Death Accountability Act, introduced by senators Corzine and Kennedy in 2003 and 2005. The bill calls for increased penalties for deaths resulting from willful failure to comply with safety regulations to a felony with a maximum of 10 years imprisonment for corporate executives.
That's the kind of reaction the families of the dead miners should expect from Congress. And the kind of response we've seen in other countries.
For example, in 1992, an explosion at the Westray mine in Nova Scotia killed 26 miners. A subsequent investigation traced the cause of the disaster to numerous violations of health and safety regulations. The judge who investigated concluded that senior executives had been grossly negligent, recommending that the government of Canada, through the Department of Justice, institute a study of the accountability of corporate executives and directors for the wrongful or negligent acts of the corporation and "introduce in the Parliament of Canada such amendments to legislation as are necessary to ensure that corporate executives and directors are held properly accountable for workplace safety."
A decade later, after numerous consultations with industry and other experts, a bill known as the "Westray bill" was passed by the Canadian Parliament.
Under Canada's new law, if anyone with supervisory authority in a corporation (not just top executives) knows about a crime committed by employees, or does nothing about corporate operations that will likely result in a crime being committed, then both the individuals and the corporation can be found guilty.
Prosecuting both the culpable individuals and the company sometimes makes sense. The latter because it creates a deterrent incentive for companies that, if convicted, can face huge potential consequences from adverse publicity and/or debarment sanctions making them ineligible for government contracts.
Yet as the Corporate Crime Reporter recently reported, it is becoming increasingly rare for prosecutors to charge the corporation. Instead, federal and state prosecutors are increasingly offering major corporations special deals (known as deferred prosecution or nonprosecution agreements) in exchange for cooperating with its investigation and prosecution of culpable executives (the "bad apple" strategy). (This is particularly the case with financial crimes.)
Ever since the prosecution of Arthur Andersen, prosecutors have either been overruled when trying to go after companies (or firms like KPMG) or told to use the deferred prosecution agreements instead, even though such agreements were originally intended only to apply to minor drug and juvenile delinquency cases (which were clogging the courts).
"It used to be that major corporations caught committing serious crimes would be brought to justice -- convicted of a crime and sentenced," says Russell Mokhiber, editor of the Corporate Crime Reporter. "No longer."
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Colin on Jan 5, 2006 3:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Personally, I don't understand how the minute you start work time it's not the sole responsibility of whomever is in charge to see that you finish the day safely. If such an idea was written into criminal law, injuries and deaths at the workplace would plummet like stones. (To all those managers who might resent such a law - wouldn't the thought of a stretch inside make you consider harder how to avoid injuries?)
However, watching from afar - this isn't actually the point I wanted to make about the incident. What got me as a foreigner watching the news were the reports that the families of the bereaved are pursuing legal claims because of the misinformation they've received! Before I continue let me say - compensation because the sole bread winner in the family has died is one thing. Suing because someone made a mistake and you possessed the wrong information for three hours is incredible! You know, reading websites like Alternet you do lose the stereotyped image of the average American but if you've ever wondered where it came from it's stories like that.
I’ve tried thinking about legitimate reasons why compensation should be given and I can't come up with any reason why it should be asked for let alone given. The idea that anyone who does anything wrong by you - be it deliberate or, crucially, accidental - deserves to be punished is a pie in the sky idea best left in the playground. Worst of all, there seems to be absolutely no debate whatsoever about their right to sue – it’s taken as given.
It’s absolutely incredible. Come on now world - show a little magnanimity!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» the right to sue and WV governmental accountability.
Posted by: Duffy
» RE: Coporate Bobbins (and the right to sue).
Posted by: BeeGee
» RE: Coporate Bobbins (and the right to sue).
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Coporate Bobbins (and the right to sue).
Posted by: brunowe
» On the other hand...
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Coporate Bobbins (and the right to sue).
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Coporate Bobbins (and the right to sue).
Posted by: Colin
» RE: Coporate Bobbins (and the right to sue).
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Coporate Bobbins (and the right to sue).
Posted by: Jimbo
» Wait a minute!
Posted by: kww355
» RE: Wait a minute!
Posted by: Jayzer
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WhatNow? on Jan 5, 2006 5:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would take me a day of work just to pay a speeding ticket. It would be nice to see some more equity in the law. I would not propose much lessening of fines on individuals other than when it comes to drug laws, which need to be totally revamped, but increase fines for corporate violations. You know corporations have to consider the fines and calculate whether observance of standards is more or less profitable than violations.
Thanks for the article. It's good to get some more information than the "suspense thriller" that is playing out on the corporate news.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Being a corporation must be nice.
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DCH on Jan 5, 2006 5:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Industrail Homicide is Accurate Depiction
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Industrail Homicide is Accurate Depiction
Posted by: Jeff G
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Siciliana on Jan 5, 2006 6:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And in the long-term, that 1866 decision should be overruled and the corporated reduced to the subservient legal construct that it is.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Corporate Personhood...
Posted by: Siciliana
» RE: Corporate Personhood...
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Corporate Personhood...
Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: Corporate Personhood...
Posted by: EncinoM
» Willful Negligence & gambling with people's lives
Posted by: Groovy Vegan
» RE: Willful Negligence & gambling with people's lives
Posted by: EncinoM
» Complete & utter b.s.
Posted by: Groovy Vegan
» RE: Willful Negligence & gambling with people's lives
Posted by: JSquercia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ctguy on Jan 5, 2006 6:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are exceptions, I'm sure, but in general unionized workers are just not as likely to be working in such unsafe conditions, especially over an extended period.
Prosecute corporate crimes, absolutely. But give workers a chance to block dangerous and/or criminal behavior by the boss through having a voice on the job. The right to organize is a human right.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Let workers organize-AMEN!!!
Posted by: kww355
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rickcreswell@yahoo.com on Jan 5, 2006 7:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: limited liability
Posted by: munchkinpup
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jan 5, 2006 8:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The next time a friend/neighbor/co-worker tells you about how it does not matter who they vote for, point them to this. The next time ANYONE, of whatever party, asks for your vote ask them if they intend to enforce environmental, worker safety and consumer protection laws. If they waffle or dance take your vote elsewhere.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fifthworld on Jan 5, 2006 8:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On a lighter note, slightly, look who's in the news again.... Hatfield and-- well, not McCoy(s), but almost: sole survivor being McCloy.
Noel
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 5, 2006 12:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What's the Matter With West Virginia?
Posted by: kww355
» RE: What's the Matter With West Virginia?
Posted by: NDnative
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Groovy Vegan on Jan 5, 2006 1:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recommended reading: Vulture in a Coal Mine
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Falang on Jan 5, 2006 5:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Groovy Vegan on Jan 5, 2006 5:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Artaraxl on Jan 6, 2006 1:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» This is an outright lie.
Posted by: Kneel
» RE: Argument for nuclear? I Don't Think So!
Posted by: Jayzer
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hoscot on Jan 6, 2006 11:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corporate boards of directors commit these crimes, and the decision makers of of corporations, those who use the corporate body as a shield against personal responsibility, must be held personally, financially and criminally responsible for the crimes they commit with the corporate weaponry.
There aught to be a law, a shoot to kill law, an aim-for-the-head law to nail the decision makers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: messiah4 on Dec 15, 2006 3:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 10, 2007 12:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 10, 2007 4:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 10, 2007 8:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 13, 2007 2:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 13, 2007 9:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 15, 2007 12:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 15, 2007 3:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 15, 2007 6:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 15, 2007 1:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 15, 2007 6:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 16, 2007 11:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 17, 2007 5:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 17, 2007 10:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 17, 2007 11:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 18, 2007 3:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 18, 2007 8:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 19, 2007 12:05 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 20, 2007 7:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 20, 2007 1:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 21, 2007 7:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 21, 2007 1:19 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 22, 2007 2:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 22, 2007 8:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 23, 2007 12:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 23, 2007 4:12 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 23, 2007 7:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 24, 2007 1:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 24, 2007 9:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 25, 2007 7:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 25, 2007 12:15 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 26, 2007 7:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 26, 2007 12:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 28, 2007 2:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 28, 2007 5:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 28, 2007 7:58 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 29, 2007 1:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 29, 2007 7:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 29, 2007 11:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Feb 24, 2007 4:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Feb 24, 2007 10:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Colin on Jan 5, 2006 3:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Personally, I don't understand how the minute you start work time it's not the sole responsibility of whomever is in charge to see that you finish the day safely. If such an idea was written into criminal law, injuries and deaths at the workplace would plummet like stones. (To all those managers who might resent such a law - wouldn't the thought of a stretch inside make you consider harder how to avoid injuries?)
However, watching from afar - this isn't actually the point I wanted to make about the incident. What got me as a foreigner watching the news were the reports that the families of the bereaved are pursuing legal claims because of the misinformation they've received! Before I continue let me say - compensation because the sole bread winner in the family has died is one thing. Suing because someone made a mistake and you possessed the wrong information for three hours is incredible! You know, reading websites like Alternet you do lose the stereotyped image of the average American but if you've ever wondered where it came from it's stories like that.
I’ve tried thinking about legitimate reasons why compensation should be given and I can't come up with any reason why it should be asked for let alone given. The idea that anyone who does anything wrong by you - be it deliberate or, crucially, accidental - deserves to be punished is a pie in the sky idea best left in the playground. Worst of all, there seems to be absolutely no debate whatsoever about their right to sue – it’s taken as given.
It’s absolutely incredible. Come on now world - show a little magnanimity!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» the right to sue and WV governmental accountability.
Posted by: Duffy
» RE: Coporate Bobbins (and the right to sue).
Posted by: BeeGee
» RE: Coporate Bobbins (and the right to sue).
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Coporate Bobbins (and the right to sue).
Posted by: brunowe
» On the other hand...
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Coporate Bobbins (and the right to sue).
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Coporate Bobbins (and the right to sue).
Posted by: Colin
» RE: Coporate Bobbins (and the right to sue).
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Coporate Bobbins (and the right to sue).
Posted by: Jimbo
» Wait a minute!
Posted by: kww355
» RE: Wait a minute!
Posted by: Jayzer
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WhatNow? on Jan 5, 2006 5:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would take me a day of work just to pay a speeding ticket. It would be nice to see some more equity in the law. I would not propose much lessening of fines on individuals other than when it comes to drug laws, which need to be totally revamped, but increase fines for corporate violations. You know corporations have to consider the fines and calculate whether observance of standards is more or less profitable than violations.
Thanks for the article. It's good to get some more information than the "suspense thriller" that is playing out on the corporate news.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Being a corporation must be nice.
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DCH on Jan 5, 2006 5:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Industrail Homicide is Accurate Depiction
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Industrail Homicide is Accurate Depiction
Posted by: Jeff G
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Siciliana on Jan 5, 2006 6:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And in the long-term, that 1866 decision should be overruled and the corporated reduced to the subservient legal construct that it is.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Corporate Personhood...
Posted by: Siciliana
» RE: Corporate Personhood...
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Corporate Personhood...
Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: Corporate Personhood...
Posted by: EncinoM
» Willful Negligence & gambling with people's lives
Posted by: Groovy Vegan
» RE: Willful Negligence & gambling with people's lives
Posted by: EncinoM
» Complete & utter b.s.
Posted by: Groovy Vegan
» RE: Willful Negligence & gambling with people's lives
Posted by: JSquercia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ctguy on Jan 5, 2006 6:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are exceptions, I'm sure, but in general unionized workers are just not as likely to be working in such unsafe conditions, especially over an extended period.
Prosecute corporate crimes, absolutely. But give workers a chance to block dangerous and/or criminal behavior by the boss through having a voice on the job. The right to organize is a human right.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Let workers organize-AMEN!!!
Posted by: kww355
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rickcreswell@yahoo.com on Jan 5, 2006 7:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: limited liability
Posted by: munchkinpup
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jan 5, 2006 8:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The next time a friend/neighbor/co-worker tells you about how it does not matter who they vote for, point them to this. The next time ANYONE, of whatever party, asks for your vote ask them if they intend to enforce environmental, worker safety and consumer protection laws. If they waffle or dance take your vote elsewhere.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fifthworld on Jan 5, 2006 8:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On a lighter note, slightly, look who's in the news again.... Hatfield and-- well, not McCoy(s), but almost: sole survivor being McCloy.
Noel
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 5, 2006 12:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What's the Matter With West Virginia?
Posted by: kww355
» RE: What's the Matter With West Virginia?
Posted by: NDnative
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Groovy Vegan on Jan 5, 2006 1:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recommended reading: Vulture in a Coal Mine
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Falang on Jan 5, 2006 5:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Groovy Vegan on Jan 5, 2006 5:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Artaraxl on Jan 6, 2006 1:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» This is an outright lie.
Posted by: Kneel
» RE: Argument for nuclear? I Don't Think So!
Posted by: Jayzer
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hoscot on Jan 6, 2006 11:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corporate boards of directors commit these crimes, and the decision makers of of corporations, those who use the corporate body as a shield against personal responsibility, must be held personally, financially and criminally responsible for the crimes they commit with the corporate weaponry.
There aught to be a law, a shoot to kill law, an aim-for-the-head law to nail the decision makers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: messiah4 on Dec 15, 2006 3:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 10, 2007 12:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 10, 2007 4:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 10, 2007 8:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 13, 2007 2:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 13, 2007 9:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 15, 2007 12:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 15, 2007 3:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 15, 2007 6:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 15, 2007 1:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 15, 2007 6:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 16, 2007 11:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 17, 2007 5:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 17, 2007 10:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 17, 2007 11:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 18, 2007 3:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 18, 2007 8:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 19, 2007 12:05 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 20, 2007 7:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 20, 2007 1:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 21, 2007 7:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 21, 2007 1:19 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 22, 2007 2:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 22, 2007 8:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 23, 2007 12:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 23, 2007 4:12 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 23, 2007 7:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 24, 2007 1:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 24, 2007 9:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 25, 2007 7:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 25, 2007 12:15 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 26, 2007 7:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 26, 2007 12:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 28, 2007 2:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 28, 2007 5:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 28, 2007 7:58 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 29, 2007 1:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 29, 2007 7:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Jan 29, 2007 11:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Feb 24, 2007 4:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruslan1989 on Feb 24, 2007 10:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




