Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sun Tzu and the Art of Spying

By Noah Leavitt, AlterNet. Posted January 5, 2006.


A White House official's wisecrack about an ancient Chinese philosopher actually provides critical insights into Bush's views on spying and executive branch power.
010506_story
Sun Tzu and the Art of Spying
Advertisement

Last week, White House spokeperson Trent Duffy provided the Bush administration's rationale for its extralegal program to spy on United States citizens. Duffy quipped: "The fact is that Al Quaida's play book is not printed on Page 1, and when America's is, it has serious ramifications. You don't need to be Sun Tzu to understand that."

Duffy was referencing the "big idea" of Sun Tzu's seminal work, "The Art of War," which could be stated as "the ideal strategy is to win without fighting -- to defeat the enemy before combat becomes necessary."

It was an odd but telling comment, and worth exploring for the critical insights it provides about Bush's views on spying and executive branch power.

It may at first seem strange to hear the White House praising an ancient Chinese Taoist thinker to justify a secret Executive Order that allows the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on phone conversations, email and other electronic communications without a court warrant. After all, this is the president who said in a December 1999 presidential debate that Jesus was his favorite political philosopher. And it is ironic, at the very least, for the born-again leader of the free world to be lauding a general from a despotic land who commanded his troops during a time of intense internal conflict.

Yet, Sun Tzu's work has been a staple of Asian business leaders for years, and has recently caught on with American CEOs. Dozens of management handbooks -- the kind you might half-heartedly thumb through in an airport bookstore when your flight has been delayed -- have drawn on Sun Tzu's military philosophy to find lessons for the corporate world. In the supercynical 1987 film "Wall Street," Gordon Gekko, the corporate raider, boasts: "I don't throw darts at a board. I bet on sure things. Read Sun Tzu."

Sun Tzu was a Chinese general who lived in the 6th century BCE, when the powerful Zhou Dynasty was in decline. Many regional feudal lords were competing with the king, and China was in a period of intense and prolonged civil war. Regarded as barbarians by other Chinese, the Zhou leaders appointed their own kinsmen -- or the kinsmen of their most trusted allies -- to rule over the various city-states. In order to convince their subjects of the legitimacy of their power, the Zhou invented a system of authority which they called the "Mandate of Heaven."

Sun Tzu was desperately worried about his nation becoming exhausted by war. He warned that "when you do battle, even if you are winning, if you continue for a long time it will dull your forces and blunt your edge. When your forces are dulled, your edge is blunted, your strength is exhausted, and your supplies are gone, then the other side will take advantage of your debility and rise up."

In order to avoid this national burnout, a leader should strive to keep the enemy off balance through extensive trickery -- "a military operation involves deception." Deception must be ongoing, and unpredictable: "Even though you are competent, appear to be incompetent. Though effective, appear to be ineffective."

Not surprisingly, Sun Tzu believed in the critical importance of spying. In his final chapter, "On the Use of Spies," Sun Tzu relates the importance of foreknowledge, which must come from people who intimately know the conditions of the enemy. He identifies five specific kinds of spies: the local, the inside, the reverse, the dead and the living. Because of their importance, "No one is given rewards as rich as those given to spies."

Yet, a deep current of Taoist moderation runs through Sun Tzu's advice, demanding clear limits and extraordinary discipline before undertaking serious campaigns such as war. In his own way, he was calling for a system of checks and balances. Thus, he warned, "One cannot use spies without sagacity and knowledge, one cannot use spies without humanity and justice"

In its dealings with the extralegal program to spy on U.S. citizens and others living in America -- or to extract information from them -- the White House has shown no sagacity, humanity or justice. Rather, the administration has done exactly the opposite of what Sun Tzu instructed.

Take sagacity. When Bush was unable to obtain top-level clearance for the wiretaps from then-Deputy Attorney General James Comey, two aides -- Andrew Card, White House chief of staff, and Alberto Gonzales, then-White House counsel -- went to George Washington University Hospital in a bizarre after-hours effort to get then-Attorney General John Ashcroft, who was recovering from gallbladder surgery, to sign off on it.

Humanity? This is the White House that supports extraordinary rendition of possible suspects to countries that torture freely in order to extract often inconsequential or fabricated information. Extraordinary rendition is when the CIA sends terror suspects to foreign intelligence agents without extradition proceedings. Suspects have been sent to Syria, Morocco, Egypt and Jordan, countries whose violent practices have been documented and condemned by the U.S. State Department's annual human rights report.


Digg!

Noah Leavitt is an attorney. He can be contacted at nsleavitt@hotmail.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Sun Tzu? Yeah right.
Posted by: Allison on Jan 5, 2006 4:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush probably thinks Sun Tzu is that sauce that comes on chicken balls. But I suppose there are many in the cabinet who actually read books, so "The Art of War" may indeed have influenced the current playbook.

"In effect, he told the American people that they may as well distrust the administration, since the administration clearly distrusts them."

They may have also read Machiavelli - whose advice to rulers included "let them hate you, as long as they fear you".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sun Tzu? Yeah right. Posted by: Swatopluk
» RE: Sun Tzu? Yeah right. Posted by: Freedom84
All that because one aide mentioned Sun Tzu?
Posted by: MPJ on Jan 5, 2006 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suppose the aide has read other books too. Good thing for us that he didn't mention a long one, or this column would be a book.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

2,500 years of technology
Posted by: liberalibrarian on Jan 5, 2006 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As the article pointed out, Sun Tzu operated during a time 2,300 years before even the notion of democracy was in human thought (ok, maybe the Greeks and Romans toyed with some prototypes...) This was an absolute monarchy--emperor (a demi-god) in a feudal society. Moreover, spying was done with men on foot and horseback handing over little pieces of parchment with ink drawn characters on them...War was not couched in euphemisms--it was "you have territory--I want it."

Americans, with all their satelites, Global positioning devices, cell phones, tiny listening devices, RFIDs, and other techno-gadgets still seem to have no clue how insidious, pervasive and truly nightmarish spying (black box Sun Tzu style) can, is and could be. Cabals, secret funding, shadow governments have no business in a modern democracy. Be afraid. More than that be angry.

Lao Tsu is the Taoist to read. Sun Tzu is soo 600 BC....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LeftBehind
Posted by: honeyrose on Jan 5, 2006 6:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Heh, Heh, Jennifer. In Bush's world, Sun Tzu could well be a sauce for chicken balls, and the Yellow Emperor would be a euphemism for urine, as in dominating the Middle East is a Yellow Emperor contest. A master of pre-emptive thought, Bush is an idiot savant, without the savant part. On the other hand, if appearing incompetent while you really are competent is the cunning strategy, Bush has out-mastered the master Sun Tzu.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hmmm Art of War vs My Pet Goat...
Posted by: doombilly on Jan 5, 2006 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could Sun Tzu's writings keep our leader steely staying the course like My Pet Goat? I think not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Given recent writings by Madsen, I would say there is even Criminal acitons....
Posted by: Pepper on Jan 5, 2006 7:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.....called for in this administration in both the Cheney and Bush camps. I put on here some stuff the other day about Dynacorp and Halliburton engaging in international child sex and labor trade. Then I read in Madsen that those videos of sexual abuse in Abu Ghraib of both men and children were given to the White HOuse for their entertainment.

That is not only perverse, but not mentioned in Sun Tsu and beyond impeachment, rather criminal and violation of pedophile laws. Why no one brings this one up is beyond me. Even Symour Hersh had such a problem watching the video proof of this that he said he could not write about it until he could pull himself together over what had occurred that he saw.

So how does one deal with this when all parties involved control every aspect of the system that prosecutes such things? Are we to have years of this stuff with a whole generation of children worldwide ruined??? Some one please speak for the "children". P

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John Boyd - The Briefing
Posted by: dancerkc on Jan 5, 2006 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The late Col. John Boyd (died 1997) was a fave of Cheney's years ago with the Boyd briefing. Boyd brought Sun-Tzu concepts to modern war for everything from jet fighters to Marine mud fighters. If you want a source for a lot of the Sun-Tzu stuff in business, military and neocon circles look up John Boyd. Here is the url of one of a great many sites on Boyd: http://www.d-n-i.net/fcs/boyd_thesis.htm - There is also at least one book on John Boyd.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the end justifies the means, apparently
Posted by: kingfelix on Jan 5, 2006 8:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the end in this case being to find a home for that article that had been lying around about Sun Tzu.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Power of Absolute control.
Posted by: Slowburn on Jan 5, 2006 9:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The corporate world tells the GOP what to tell the fundamentalists so as to control how they think and feel so they
can control the electoral process in order to control the vast resources of our nation and be able to enforce with our nations military the corporate worlds agenda of absolute control of the worlds resources.
Its bigger than bush Its about world domination through secrecy and deception it is the corporate world that is applying the teachings of Sun Tzu and doing a good job of it. Do not believe that bush is in control of anything. He will do as he is told or he will be replaced by someone Who will. I.E. (The Harriet Meyers nomination) it put in jeopardy control of the electoral process.
There is one part of the equation that the corporate world will never beat down and Sun Tzu realized it long ago it is the (WE THE PEOPLE) part of the equation.
Lets pray that the fundamentalists will see that they are being controlled for evil ends and that god has a special place for the false prophets and the lying manipulators that are in power today .
PS. no disrespect meant to the brave solders that are just doing
their jobs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think they're full of Shitzu
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jan 5, 2006 10:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wiretaps and domestic spying are the tools of of every ruling class since the age of written history. There in lies the problem. Since all of written history deals with conquest and violence that's the format that's subtley implanted into the social conscience. Violence lying,and spying is repeated over,and,over again as if we are incapable of choosing a diffrent route. As a human we are indowed with the blessing of changing our minds. That with the ability to pull it off sets us apart from the other animals. When you figure in the cost of such policies,the numbers 'have' to go up yearly for the 'enemies' never sleep. Pretty soon it's costing the money that could pay for healthcare for all and the dividend is we are less secure.
The fact is that it's FAILED POLICIES that have created this mess. It's the reason for the war,the wiretaps,screen monitoring,undercover shadowing, and the 'targeting' of American Citizens. They'll search an environmentalists house,but, give the Nazi's a permit to march. That act alone shows where the system is really aligned. It's all about control. Control over you,me, everyone. This is bullshit. For this or any country. It's up to the People to get the country back. The two parties have proven themselves corrupted.
When the republican party formed they were ANTI CORPERATION. It took less than 100 years for them to sell out. It's time to make NEW PARTIES. Not third parties.Scrap the two we have and create new ones. The rich will make their own,which makes them easy to spot and not support. The People will form a better leadership based on goals that support the broadest segment of the population and the fullest blessings of Liberty and Freedom. How much spying do you need in your life?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enough of this dead Chinese mystical shit!
Posted by: Againstthewindwalking on Jan 5, 2006 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If any President in the history of this Great Nation deserves impeachment, It's George W Bush! How we bring that about is what we need to be discusing!

I want to know more about that child- rape deal that was going on in Iraq! Why has this not been shown on national news? Why are we not screaming it from the rooftops! Somebody give me the links to find out the facts and I'll post them on my Blog tomorrow!

Check out "http://stoneysrage.blogspot.com" and while you're at it, "http://cyclone696.blogspot.com" is one EVERYBODY needs to check out!!

Somebody give me the info and I'll spread it far and wide!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TAOISM given Bad Rap
Posted by: Bobb9999 on Jan 5, 2006 12:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To call SunTzu a "Taoist" is questionable...

To begin with, Lao Tzu is considered the founder of Taoism and his Tao Te Ching regarded as the first Taoist text. Lao Tzu reportedly was born around 500 BCE putting him in the 5th C BCE.

If Sun Tzu lived in the century previous to Taoism's founder, how can Sun be termed a Taoist? Pre-Taoist potentially, I suppose...until you look at what Lao Tzu had to say about war!

From Lao Tzu's
Tao Te Ching, Ch. 31:

"When at war (the ruler) honours the right [symbolic of EVIL omens]
Fine weapons are instruments of evil, not the instruments of a good ruler.
When he uses them unavoidably, he regards calm restraint as the best principle.
Even when he is victorious, he does not regard it as praiseworthy,
For to praise victory is to delight in the slaughter of men.
He who delights in the slaughter of men will not succeed in the empire."

-Translation by Wing-Tsit Chan from his "A Sourcebook in Chinese Philosophy"

Lao Tzu , who views war as an unglorious evil (though at times unavoidable), would not be likely to call the war monger Sun Tzu a good Taoist , or a Taoist, period!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: TAOISM given Bad Rap Posted by: liberalibrarian
» RE: TAOISM given Bad Rap Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: TAOISM given Bad Rap Posted by: Basenjis
» Sun Tzu -- and -- Jesus Christ Posted by: AdamSelene11726
» RE: TAOISM given Bad Rap Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: TAOISM given Bad Rap Posted by: Bobb9999
Sun Tzu on Main Street or Capitol Hill
Posted by: thehousedog on Jan 5, 2006 2:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One wonders if somebody on Main Street (insert small town here) even cares about this. While flag waving has become a national past-time for the "This President Can Do No Wrong" crowd, this will appear to be nothing more than some intellectual argument over a long-dead philosopher who wasn't even an American. Our civil liberties, rights and even our ability to respond to our despotic leaders are in decline and if we had a Gallup poll, most people would probably favor fewer liberties during this "time of war" than not. Fifty years from now, people will be told to think they should be glad they didn't live in the early part of the 21st Century because we had too many freedoms. Let's face it - as long as we think we're at war we will have this narrow minded vision and we'll get what the majority wants - good, bad or rotten.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Machiavelli ACTUALLY said...
Posted by: medstudgeek on Jan 5, 2006 6:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is better to be feared than to be loved, but whatever you do, make sure that you are not hated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Item assumes 1) Bush can read. 2) " Render" is OK.
Posted by: verite on Jan 5, 2006 9:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry. We have no proof of this.
Let alone read any exotic ancient so-called philosophers with funny looking names.
He may have misread his "You are required to report back for duty" letter from the US army, so what chance would Lao Tzu have? Or more likely he never even opened it.
On the render word.
What other "political philosophy" did Jesu expound, when presented with a coin of the realm.. other that "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's"

"This is the White House that supports extraordinary rendition (sic) of possible suspects to countries that torture freely in order to extract often inconsequential or fabricated information."

I have objected to this adoption of the "rendition" word without inverted commas and this has led to a change in The Guardian and The Independent usage.

eg my email of 7th dec 05


Chere Alan Rusbridger,

re your item about the UK part in Usuk torture...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/ 0,12271,1659058,00.html

" The all-party parliamentary group on extraordinary renditions (sic) was presented with a report by American legal academics which suggested that Britain may be breaking international law by "acquiescing" in torture."

Why is "extraordinary renditions" the Bush admin. truth and reality avoidance terminology adopted without quotation marks?

This is almost as stupid as the Bushism "War on Terror" (War IS Terror" - Pilger)

"Outsourcing" torture should not be described in ways that avoids the truth.

Rendering usually means removing the fat from flesh. This reminds me of a possible accurate use in describing the effects of the high temperatures obtained by the Usuk bunker buster killing of 480 Iraqi civilians, mostly women and children and elderly victims in the Al Amiriya shelter..... about 4:30 AM on February 13, 1991, during the First Usuk attack on Iraq. It was Fisk who described wading through the layer of human fat that had been "rendered" and formed on the surface of water and other human remains.
(Also described at http://www.freearabvoice.org/newsbytes/ visitWMDSiteInBaghdad.htm )

It is not accurate usage for describing kidnapping and transporting victims for torture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gathaiga
Posted by: gathaiga on Jan 6, 2006 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS?? HA! MORE SOUND AND FURY SIGNIFYING NOTHING EXCEPT TO FURTHER POLITICAL ASPIRATIONS...SUCH AS REELECTION. REMEMBER ROBERTS? JUST WATCH THE UPCOMING HEARINGS FOR ALITO.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sun Tzu
Posted by: robchapman on Jan 6, 2006 9:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is good to know that President Bush, the War President, is studying up on war four years after getting us into one.
It is bad to know that after he reads good advice, he goes out and does the opposite.
Beyond the man's immorality lies the larger and scarier concern of his sheer incompetence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of course Bush broke the law...
Posted by: adp3d on Jan 7, 2006 12:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...but ya know, who is going to arrest him? It will probably be some Cindy Sheahan-like citizen who decides that enough is enough. Said person then will probably be spirited away to some secret prison and held as an enemy combatant. Folks, what we have here is a full blown dictatorship. In Sinclair Lewis's It Can't Happen Here one of the first things the President did was to send the military to dissolve congress...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]