Five Stories Making the Buzz In 2006

Despite Bush's dismal approval ratings, the war of the frames -- how we talk about the big news and big ideas in the culturesphere -- was won by the conservatives in 2005. Think of the catch phrases of the year: The "War on Terrorism," "Intelligent Design," the "War on Christmas," even "cut and run."

These phrases may have caught on because of the efficacy of grassroots right-wing groups, but they also stuck because they are active, concrete phrases with strong verbs and easily pronounceable names. But we can do that and one better, right people?

Below are five of the biggest stories I predict we'll be buzzing about in 2006, and some suggestions on how to start talking about them now.

1. Don't Spy on Me: The Unwarranted Unprecedented Wire-Tap Scandal

Think of those poor folks in other countries whose governments never listen to them. Well, ours listens all right, even into our private conversations. Bush's school-yard defensiveness has yet to defuse what may prove to be the biggest story of 2006: the first time in history a sitting president has admitted to an impeachable offense: illegal spying on American citizens. Without warrants and with a greenlight from Bush, the National Security Agency has gathered reams of information from the telephone and Internet communications of U.S. citizens.

So far, public reaction has been muted. There are a couple of lawsuits in the works, and a few congress members have suggested at least beginning an investigation into impeachment. A new Justice Department investigation into the leak will keep the story in the news, but the focus will be more on who broke the story to the New York Times than what's wrong with the eavesdropping in the first place.

So how to talk about the spy scandal in 2006? Bush's unapologetic spying without warrants is emblematic of this administration's disregard for civil liberties for both citizens and noncitizens alike. The spying scandal is also interlinked with the administration's acceptance of (and complicity in) the use of torture, which is one reason it's critical to keep this story alive in 2006.

If such actions are allowed to continue, they represent the time when the "War on Terror" became the excuse for complete disregard of the U.S. Constitution. Readers gave some good suggestions on how to frame this issue. My favorites: pictures of Bush with elephant ears and T-shirts that say: "My Government Listens To My Every Word" and "Illegal Spying Is An Impeachable Offense."

2. The (Continuing) Disaster in Iraq

While the number of U.S. troops in Iraq will shrink in 2006, the number of needless deaths there will only increase. Since the time "Mission Accomplished" was declared in Iraq (May 1, 2003), 2,035 Americans and well over 25,000 Iraqis have been killed there. [Sources HERE and HERE.] While each new election in Iraq is followed up by Bush speeches about how we're on the road to getting the hell out of there, the truth is there is no end in sight. Let's call it the Debacle in the Desert. The Great Mistake. Or, simply, the Iraqi Quagmire.

But 2005 was also the year when Cindy Sheehan showed us the best strategy for changing people's minds: keep it personal and speak from experience. Perhaps that explains the proliferation of options for veterans against the war: Gold Star Families for Peace, Veterans for Peace, Veterans Against the Iraqi War and Iraq Veterans Against the War are all active groups made up of military families.

Amadee Braxton, of Iraq Veterans Against the War, explained why she's hopeful for 2006. "Veterans of the Iraq war and those still serving are the ones most capable of explaining the differences between the war the Bush administration portrays and the reality of the war on the ground," she said. "Most of the veterans realize, when they're over there, that they're viewed as an occupying force; not as liberators but as target practice.