Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

A Bad Year for Goliath

By Rebecca Solnit, Tomdispatch.com. Posted December 23, 2005.


The torture, the poor, the scandals and the spying: was 2005 the moment when the world's last standing superpower began to totter?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Rebecca Solnit

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

To say that it was a bad year for Goliath doesn't mean it was exactly a good one for what George Bailey, in annual holiday It's a Wonderful Life reruns, calls "the little people."

U.S. public opinion has almost caught up with the rest of the world in opposing the war, but Iraqis are still being bombed and American soldiers are still dying. I write this from Buenos Aires, which attracts activists from afar for its progressive social movements, but up close is more compelling for its armies of the poor -- such as the cartoñeros who come out after dark to collect recyclables, families pushing huge loads through the summer night toward whatever pittance a pile of old cardboard brings in.

In the same way, you could focus on how Hurricane Katrina damaged the Bush administration's standing, but the suffering of people displaced on roofs, and then in sports stadiums, and now out of view (but in hardly less precarious circumstances around the country) might matter more. The most compelling images of 2005 are those of war, flood, and riot, but perhaps the most summary one wasn't even of human beings.

It was a novelty photograph that appeared in many newspapers in late September of a huge non-native python that choked itself to death trying to swallow an alligator in Florida. It proved a lasting image of overwhelming and unsuccessful greed. All around the world this year, the snake choked and the alligator refused to see itself as lunch -- if you will let "alligator" stand in here for "civil society," for all the groups, organizations, publics, and citizenries who stood up for their rights.

Nobody did this better in 2005 than the extraordinary Coalition of Immokalee Workers, which in March brought one of the biggest prepared food corporations on Earth, Taco Bell's owner, Yum Brands Incorporated, to its knees. Or, you could say, choked it on its own fajitas and forced it to swallow a compellingly better set of working standards for those who pick the tomatoes that get diced up and sprinkled by the kids in starchy blouses atop your -- if you weren't part of the enormously successful Boycott the Bell campaign -- tostada.

The largely immigrant workforce, based in the bleak Florida town of Immokalee, had been organizing for more than a decade, and their campaign to raise the price for picking tomatoes by a penny a pound (a measly sum that nevertheless nearly doubled many workers' salaries) was inspired. Creative in specific tactics like theatrical performances and marches as well as in coalition-building with college students, religious groups, and others, the CIW made undocumented farmworkers powerful again -- and they are taking on McDonald's next.

Speaking of food, just what kind of corn is in your tortilla anyway? A few years ago, microbiologist Ignacio Chapela, then an assistant professor at the University of California, Berkeley, wrote a report demonstrating that bioengineered corn, though banned from being planted in Mexico, was nevertheless springing to Frankensteinian life there, contaminating that country's corn crops.

The preeminent science journal Nature published it with an unprecedented caveat, though the real cause for concern wasn't Chapela's credentials or methodology but the threat his work as a scientist and critic -- of, among other things, Novartis' funding of his department -- posed to multinational corporations. (A subsequent independent study validated his results.) Chapela was then denied tenure at Berkeley by a committee that appeared to have major conflicts of interest.

After a two-year campaign that included demonstrations, teach-ins, and other forms of ruckus, a higher tenure review committee overturned the decision of the highly politicized departmental committee that had rejected him. It was a small victory, but an emblematic one in this year of crumpling Goliaths.

Back in Mexico, Vicente Fox's party, the PAN, attempted to disqualify Mexico City's Mayor Manuel Lopez Obrador from next year's presidential election over a tiny legal technicality. It was a move as bald-facedly overblown in its grounds and biased in its agenda as the impeachment hearings against Bill Clinton (which, this year, had the handy, if belated, effect of making it harder for Republicans to object to special counsels pursuing perjury charges).

About a million people marched in Mexico City to condemn this blatantly corrupt move, a popular opposition that the PAN found, ultimately, irresistible. The charges were withdrawn and Obrador is now favored to win next spring; he will likely become a comparatively uncorrupt and progressive president for a country that has long deserved far more.

The great conundrum of recounting recent history is this: Individual names have to stand in for movements that generally remain not just nameless but often overlooked; the antiwar movement in this country, for instance, became "Cindy" for bereaved mother and outspoken activist Cindy Sheehan.


Digg!

Rebecca Solnit is the author of 'Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities'.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
How about a new style of governance
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Dec 23, 2005 6:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
PLATFORM of the People Over Tyrants Party O/K/A The P.O.T. Party

Because of the current trends in National and Foreign Policy and the many and varied forms of tyranny our people are being exposed to,we have formed from the People, a Party, that is For the People. This is our
vision of how we get the Country back for the People,restore our Liberty,Freedom,and Peace,here and now.
NO MORE WARS.
This country has 'made' the enemies we now face through corrupt policy in the name of 'Profits'.
We would cease all weapons sales,development and deployment.
Close all bases on foriegn soils,begin TOTAL DISARMAMENT with pacts of Non- Aggression.
END ALL BLACK PROJECTS FUNDING. Disband the C.I.A., Homeland Security,and the DEA.
All monies would be 'redirected' to Free Education for ALL People, K- Grad School.
PROTECT THE EARTH
Restore the 'Roadless' Laws in perpituity.Ban clear cut forestry operations. End logging in the National Forests. 1,000 year moritorium on mining. Restore the Great Lakes and rivers.
Force Industry to be 'inert' environmentally, Force Auto Industry to make High Mileage Hybred cars and trucks.EXTREME CONTROLS on pesticides and fretilizers and emmissions.
Heavy reliance on Solar,Wind, Hydro Generation, Hemp and other Biomass fuels for charcoal.
STOP DRILLING IN THE ANWR. Force Oil Companies to RESTORE IMPACTED AREAS.
PUT THE MONEY BACK IN THE PEOPLE'S HANDS
Freeze all Transportation Fuels and Utility prices for ten years. Extendable if deemed so by the People.
END COMPOUND INTREST RATES on loans,mortgages and small business loans.
FORGIVE ALL DEBTS. End Property Tax on ALL VETERAN'S personal homes.
CUT DEFENSE 60%, fund FULL HEALTHCARE and ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
Non Deductable/Refundable 90% TAX The WEALTHIEST PEOPLE and BUSINESSES.
Make SOCIAL SECURITY an ALWAYS FUNDED Program
GIVE food stamps to all Low Imcome Families.
GETTING POWER TO THE PEOPLE
PARDON ALL VICTIMLESS,NON-VIOLENT OFFENDERS.
PARDON ALL POLITICAL PRISONERS
MAKE NATURAL DRUGS LEGAL, MAKE MANUFACTURED DRUGS PERSCRIPTIONABLE.
EXPAND THE BILL of RIGHTS PROTECTION TO INCLUDE MARANDA RIGHTS
END WARRANTLESS SEARCHES,DOMESTIC SPYING ON CITIZENS
GUARANTEE THAT PEOPLE CAN DO WITH THEIR BODIES WHATEVER THEY DEEM RIGHT
ALL UNIONS WOULD BE BACKED BY THE GOVT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How about a new style of governance Posted by: montana freeman
Election surprises? What about VA, MT, WY, etc ...?
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 23, 2005 6:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the author cared to look at VA, she would have seen that even a red state like this one can almost elect a liberal. Even in the Lt governor's and attorney general's race were razor thin what with a hard core "conservative" vs a solid liberal in both cases. At 49+ %, it'll only take a little more effort to prove that liberals can indeed win in red state America without using the DLC strategy of moving to the "center"/right. And even with all the rightwing tricks KILgore tried to use to pull another "Kansas" on a whole host of social issues, Kaine outwitted him and even stopped acting like a DLCer for once.

And what about MT and WY? At least the Democratic governors there made some progress on economic and environmental issues by not moving to the "center"/right and now they're far more popular than Bush is in those two states.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ebenezer Bush and the Corporate Schrooges finally meet their Ghosts?
Posted by: monkeywrench on Dec 23, 2005 10:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you, Rebecca, for your Christmas...er...uh...Holiday? present. It's heartening to be reminded of of what actually went right in the Annus Horriblis 2005. Maybe 2006 has a chance of being truly a New Year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are You Kidding?? :(
Posted by: Annapurna1 on Dec 23, 2005 11:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to todays' (12/23) rasmussen poll, Goliath is alive and kicking. The Zogby poll also backs this up. Tragically, the tide has clearly turned in Goliaths' favour, and whatever semblence of a free america still remains will quickly be swept aside when an almost entirely neocon congress takes office in 2007. And with strong american public support behind the neocons and totalitarianism, its little wonder that the so-called "terrorists" would want to blow us up either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Are You Kidding?? :( Posted by: Ziad
Solnit's Fumble
Posted by: ceti on Dec 23, 2005 11:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know where Rebecca is going by her back handed comments calling Hugo Chavez a "demagogue" or Morales "far left", but she has things quite backwards.

Chavez isn't even a populist but a truly revolutionary leader who embodies the hopes and dreams of a non-capitalist, non-racist future, while Morales isn't as far left as the social movements who are only giving him 3 months to prove that the state can actually work to benefit the people.

Even the metaphor she uses for her article is directly lifted from what Chavez has been saying all year long about how the "the global struggle of the poor" can be characterized as "David- and-Goliath battle between good and evil."

His words from the World Social Forum:

"When imperialism feels weak, it resorts to brute force.... They won't allow [journalists] to take pictures of the bodies of the dead soldiers, many of them Latinos, coming from Iraq. Those are signs of Goliath's weaknesses.

If we don't make that better world possible, if we fail, and through the rifles of the U.S. Marines, and through Mr. Bush's murderous bombs, if there is no coincidence and organization necessary in the south to resist the offensive of neo-imperialism, and the Bush doctrine is imposed upon the world, the world will be destroyed."


Rather than upholding true Davids, Rebecca tars them with the same brush used by Goliath. This is very disappointing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sonit TOTALLY WRONG about CHAVEZ!
Posted by: Ziad on Dec 23, 2005 8:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know what Solnit is talking about referring to Venezuela's Chavez as a "demogogue". What I do know about Chavez makes me conclude Solnit is ignorant about Chavez' accomplishments, such as the following:

1. He is currently selling heating oil to poor people in the Eastern U.S. states (such as Massachutesetts) at HALF PRICE!! What is our government doing for the poor in winter (answer: less and less or next to nothing). Imagine that: half price oil for American poor. Chavez is very generous to us yankees, methinks. Hardly an act of a demogogue in this instance.

2. Chavez takes a quite significant percentage of the profits he gets from state oil consortium profits and funds education, healthcare, and welfare for the most poor and needy in his country. This is probably why our federal government hates Chavez so much: he GIVES to those in need generously (unlike our country which takes from the poor and gives permanent massive tax cuts to the filthy rich). Chavez is making our feds look like the scrooges they truly are--and they don't like it and want him exterminated (maybe Solnit does as well?).

3. Chavez has a very cool barter system going on with Cuba right now: Chavez ships Cuba badly needed oil, and Cuba sends Physicians to Venezuela to care for the lame and ill who are too poor to pay for their treatment. This is socialism with compassion, and I for one think this is very cool what they are doing. Quite unlike my country, the USA, which makes OBSCENE profits on the human condition: no national health insurance (like all other modern industrialized nations give their citizens), and people losing their homes or life savings because they were uninsured and got very ill and got screwed over by our rapaciously greedy healthcare "shitzdem".

4. Finally, I will agree Chavez gets a bit boisterous at times, dissing Halloween and such. But can you blame him for hating the USA? NAFTA has ruined small local farmers throughout South America, our corporations keep most South Americans in poverty with huge monopolies in agriculture which benefit Dole, Tropicana or other large agri-biz corporations. I think it is fabulous that South Americans are increasingly taking a stand against corporate america and the federal government which does it's bidding militarily down there. Way to go Chavez!!!! Viva Chavez!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sonit TOTALLY WRONG about CHAVEZ! Posted by: montana freeman
Good summary, Rebecca!
Posted by: Xjy on Dec 30, 2005 3:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for this!
You covered a lot of ground with good social and international perspectives.
I think the people leaping to Chavez's defence fail to realize how very little it takes these days to appear progressive or even revolutionary. Bourgeois democracy has made huge revolutions in the past, and beheaded kings (England and France) - it threw off the Imperial British yoke in America in 1776. But the American revolutionaries were slave-owners!!!
And there is no mass base these days for *bourgeois* democratic change - Chavez's mass base exists (or he'd be dead) but they want socialist measures, not purely bourgeois ones - complete nationalization under workers' control of the land and production, not some welfare state compromise with some nationalization and lots of big private owners remaining to run production for profit not people.
When Mao characterized imperialism (that's us, in the West, following our governments and big business) as a Paper Tiger, he wasn´t all wrong. The people who benefit big-time from world exploitation are very few in number. The flesh and bones that make their tiger hurt others are made up of a mass of hangers-on (middle management, lawyers and media people for instance) and mercenaries. If the mercenaries refuse to shoot their brothers and sisters, and we wipe out the debt that´s crippling the hangers-on, the tiger deflates and is just a paper skin.

I think you're right about this having been a pivotal year. Now that perceptions are changing, the necessary catalyst of a large-scale social movement, along with a new readiness to listen to arguments for a new basis for society (no private capital running big manufacturing, food and service industries, for instance) may not be too far away.
Venezuela and Bolivia show things can happen even in a very disadvantageous world situation.
Now all we´ve got to do is think bolder, organize better and say NO a damn sight louder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]