Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

2005 Media Follies!

By Geov Parrish, AlterNet. Posted December 27, 2005.


The 10th annual list of the year's most overhyped and underreported stories.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Geov Parrish

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

As one would expect in a year when one of the underreported stories was our government's covert propaganda campaigns, there's plenty to unravel: stories that should never have been stories, stories whose reporting largely missed the point, and stories barely told at all in mainstream US media.

The good news is that, more than ever, mainstream media is no longer the last word in journalism. Foreign media, now universally available in English on the Internet, often tells a completely different (and usually more accurate) story than what we see, read, and hear here. So-called alternative media--which has been way ahead of the mainstream media on any number of issues--has repeatedly shown its relevance, to the point where the Internet is rapidly becoming the preferred news source for many Americans.

But it's the mainstream that still has the largest audiences, and so it is the stories that do and don't appear there that require our attention. Here's our list, which is surely incomplete.

The Year's Most Overhyped Stories:

The fate of Terri Schiavo. Somehow, the fate of a woman who hadn't done much more than twitch in nearly two decades, and who had clearly stated that she never wanted to be kept alive in such conditions, became a crude political football for pandering Presidents and members of Congress. They should be ashamed--as should the media outlets that milked this non-story for weeks.

Intelligent Design [sic].

The "War on Christmas." What do all three of these items have in common? They were all introduced and hammered into self-serving "controversies" by the right-wing echo chamber at times when they really wanted to make sure the public wasn't paying attention to congressional or White House scandals, a disastrous war, or the death of a major American city.

Everything's Going Splendidly in Iraq. From the myth early in the year that Bush's vision for democracy was spreading like wildfire throughout the Middle East, to the notion that Iraqi troops were trained en masse and ready to fight, to entirely mythical "progress" in Iraq's economy and reconstruction, to the prediction, dutifully trotted out during three separate elections, that each such election marked a major turning point and a crippling blow for the insurgency, to an insurgency in its "death throes," it was hard to take seriously anything the White House said about Iraq. Yet, remarkably, large segments of US media did just that.

Michael Jackson's Trial.

Martha Stewart's Comeback.

Julia Roberts' Baby. OK, OK, any of the beautiful people.

Howard Dean. Now the Democratic National Committee head, Howard still shoots off his mouth (often accurately), and Republicans still get themselves all in a knot whenever he does. Get over it. He's a glorified party fundraiser now, not a public official. What he says about public policy does not matter.

Pat Robertson. He wants Hugo Chavez dead. He threatens Dover, Pennsylvania on behalf of a God who apparently can't speak for Himself. He thinks New Orleans' suffering is punishment for not meeting his warped idea of morality. WHO. CARES. The publicity just encourages him.

The Minutemen. A few hundred yahoos on the Mexican border, and a few dozen on the Canadian border, proves only that there are still unemployed racist idiots living in Orange County and its spiritual equivalents.

Plus sports, 14-Day-Accu--Pinpoint-Doppler-Radar-Insta-Weather, the usual.

The Underreported Stories:

George Bush is already a lame-duck president. There's usually a year or two grace period after the president is elected for the second time, when he can point to his second election victory as vindication for his policies and use it to get some important legislation passed. Bush has squandered his election victory. All the major initiatives he wanted to pass in Congress this year, from the privatization of Social Security to the permanent renewal of the USA Patriot Act provisions, have gone down in flames, even with a solid Republican majority in both houses. The most basic budget bills have failed to pass because Bush couldn't get a consensus within his own party. Meanwhile, members of his administration are leaking stories of Bush administration misdeeds every week. Three more years of this and the Republican Party may never recover.


Digg!

Geov Parrish is a Seattle-based columnist and reporter for Seattle Weekly, In These Times and Eat the State! He writes the Straight Shot column for WorkingForChange.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
GEORGE W. BUSH IS THE GREATEST PRESIDENT IN HISTORY!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Dec 27, 2005 2:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is what I think is the most important story of 2005. Athough it got some overseas coverage, it was virtually ignored by the mainstream US media market. Here it is: In an age of information overload, an unbelievably huge segment of the American public (almost 50 percent of them) are so jaw-droppingly dumb that they actually believe that George W. Bush is doing a good job. And that's the way it is, December 27, 2005. I'm Walter Cronkite....I mean...
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan#frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Media Follies?
Posted by: Scott Griffith on Dec 27, 2005 3:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Makes it sound fun, like the Folies Bergeres. Media SNAFUS might do, or sluttishness, or just crap. Nevertheless, the article is very, very useful and way to needs to be found to publicise it. Another neglected story, referred to in the introduction, is the one about how woeful US media coverage is compared with most others. More ridicule would help. Well done. Big Scott

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Media Follies? Posted by: cacky
» RE: Media Follies? Posted by: Asmodeus
Missed a couple
Posted by: mhanmore on Dec 27, 2005 4:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
  I know, I know, so much potential content for an article like this, but after spending a few months in the US earlier this year, (during the Terri Schiavo debacle) I thought there are a couple more worthy of mention.
   Important ANWAR legislation and major reform of bankruptcy laws went unnoticed thanks to the Schiavo cover.
   The other all-important story - it seemed to me - was the one about that young blonde who managed to disappear in Aruba. Very sad, of course, but between her and Jacko what hope was there for real issues?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Missed a couple Posted by: Basenjis
Forgotten News Reader
Posted by: anothername on Dec 27, 2005 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the news media itself is the biggest missed story. In the past decade newspapers and broadcast news shows have led with the human interest angle of a story instead of the story itself. What I've realized this year is that Americans are so eager to have a human connection that no one is putting all the human interest pieces together to see the news behind them. For example, this week as news media review the year's events, they all focus on how big Katrina was and how the scope of the damage was missed because of its size. Of course it was missed, since there was rarely news coverage of the damage writ large; instead Joe Smith and Jane Quincy were shown at their destroyed houses and we all were to ache for them. Rape as a tool of war is another missed news item; rape has always existed in war, and in peace, but it was only in one sentence of one story about individual women's pain that there was an actual news item about rapes being used much more systematically in recent years. If we want to change the world and stop its rightward spin, we have to understand the underlying causes and connections, not just react to the human toil and toll.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have two not mentioned, Pentagon skying on all citizens and the GAO report on voting machines
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Dec 27, 2005 6:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have talked all about the NSA spying and somehow the wholesale spying on all of us has not been reported much on MSM or the internet for that matter. The GAO report on the Voting machines made by Diebolt, had not even been reported at all in MSM. These are two very big things that really need to be out in the public domain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Really dumbing down network news
Posted by: dale0k on Dec 27, 2005 7:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tom Brolaw and Ted Koeppel were being interviewed on "Meet the Press" by Tim Russert. It was a revelation. While watching these guys discuss the "major news items," it was ever so apparent that major network news must just be polling the American people to decide what is newsworthy, instead of pushing the news that is important for people to know. It is working backwards.

I suppose it is ever thus. The polls in this case are ratings, apparently. The real news goes unreported, as is evinced in the piece here. Sensational is overreported, the important, underreported.
It is sickening, and I was almost screaming at the tube as the lame brains Koeppel and Brokaw brought absolutely no insight to the topics, but lamely went along with the status quo, the "conventional wisdom" on what was news...
These people are overpaid, useless shills. Nice hair, guys...

We need an Alter.network.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How does this all begin?
Posted by: rotorooter on Dec 27, 2005 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that important stories get underreported and seemingly insignificant ones get overhyped. My question is, how does this happen? I understand that once a story such as the one of the girl that disappeared in Aruba gains traction with the media, then all the media jumps on the bandwagon in order to keep up with the Jones'. But, who jumpstarts these stories? How do they gain such significance as to blot out bigger stories or shove them to the background? Who sets the agenda?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How does this all begin? Posted by: oakgroveinn
No surprise.
Posted by: alternetleslie on Dec 27, 2005 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What do you expect when Disney owns ABC. They think the news is part of the entertainment industry. Murdock own a significant market share and his style and objective is sensationalism to sell papers, not inform the citizenry of a democracy. The big fish eat up the little fish in publishing and broadcasting taking up larger market share with fewer companies and voices, all dependent on large corporate sponsorship for revenue. They don't want to loose their sponsors. They cut the costs to improve their profits, so independent investigative reporting, especially overseas, is cut and dependence on services like AP is their common source of news worldwide. Big corporations tend to be Republican. So where's the big surprise??? Articles are bias not only in how the story is told, but what stories are eliminated and just not covered purposefully. The freedom of the press is the freedom to repress the news. How much of the news is unimportant filler and free press releases from sponsors with no cost to the publishers and broadcasters. Even articles in magazines are placed near paid ads to support the products sold.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No surprise. Posted by: Iconoclast421
Election fraud
Posted by: dandelo on Dec 27, 2005 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for a good article, and I agree with a previous comment that the alarming state of our media is itself a big story; but it seems to me you omitted one of the very biggest under-reported stories in U.S. history: the "alleged" rigging of our voting system. 'Non-reported' would be more accurate. It's STILL described as only a "conspiracy theory" cooked up by crazy leftists, despite absolute truckloads of evidence that nobody wants to look at.
This "bedrock" of our democracy has more cracks in it than, I dunno... the polar ice caps, perhaps. Or the Dubya AWOL story, speaking of under-reported. Please do a piece on our bruised & bleeding voting system before it goes the way of Terri Schaivo. Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: lection fraud Posted by: mwildfire
» I'd add "Able Danger". Posted by: Mein Bush
Springer's Song
Posted by: maggie on Dec 27, 2005 8:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did anyone else hear this one? Jerry Springer had a song on his show for a few days about all the pretty blond girls in the news being used as cover for all the real news. It used the Beachboy's refrain...Aruba, and Terry, and ????

If someone knows how to find this one, I'd like to know and think others would appreciate it, too.

It's all about money and profits and control of the news. How do we keep the internet free and open?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Springer's Song Posted by: oakgroveinn
Want real change? Hit 'em in their wallets.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Dec 27, 2005 9:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What else can we expect from the western equivalent of Pravda and Izvestia? Only this time, instead of parroting the party Line, the media, through Republican/neoCON rhetoric, are actually parroting the CORPORATE line. To hell with Bush; if you want to find the origin of the absolutely astounding level of corruption in our government, just follow the tidal wave of corporate bribery flowing in and around that cesspool called Washington D.C.

And these corporations do not care if America takes a dump; they are multinational in production and sales, so this market doesn't matter much any more. ...And there will always be politicians willing to do their bidding, for a price – chicken feed to a corporation.

Want to help the rise of REAL democracy? One way is to stop buying all of that useless, cheap plastic shit that the corporate/media machine has convinced most americans they just have to have.... Instead, buy only what you really need, buy quality, keep it forever, and help prevent the world from turning into one big garbage dump; your kids will thank you.

Oh, yeah –– and save what money you can; the way we're going, you're gonna need it...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush's rape of our country is no joke...
Posted by: packofwolves on Dec 27, 2005 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush needs to be impeached and tried as the war criminal he is. So should Rumsfeld and the rest of his administration. They have caused so much damage to this country in so many ways that I'm not sure we'll ever recover. I am ashamed that so many people in this country think Bush is doing a good job and can't see the truth if it bit them. That certainly attests to the poor educational system we have in this country and the unrelenting propaganda to a population that will believe anything they are told by the government. During this president's rein the environment has been attacked, we have alienated ourselves from the rest of the world, we have attacked and devastated another country in the name of democracy, and now China and Japan own us. The rich keep getting richer and the poor keep getting poorer and the division between the haves and have-nots and resulting unrest keeps growing exponentially. We are headed right into a revolution and we can thank the Bushies for their unending and greed-driven help in that direction. This country is on the way out and I believe that Bush is the reason we will die prematurely. He is certainly the reason our country will be remembered only as hypocrites using the name of democracy as it's cover. Shame on you Busies and shame on the people in this country for allowing him so much free rein in order to cause so much damage (inside and outside) to this once great country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A satellite ground track goes over your home
Posted by: ScottP on Dec 27, 2005 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While the media (even indy) reports the so called NSA spy news, perhaps we should actually think about this a bit. Should we presume that spy satellites fly low orbits close to a variety of targets, or in geo-synchronous orbits many times as far away and with no ability to monitor alternative targets? Once we agree that the satellites fly in low orbits, take a look at their orbits, which must fly over the US by the laws of orbit mechanics. The existence of these "assets" has been public since Carter declassified their basics. And so now we are to believe that they capture the information at our borders and overseas, but not inside the US? We're to believe they're commanded to stop listening just at the instant they cross above the border, and commanded on again just as they exit the border on the other side?

One should view these stories as an off-election-year effort by the mainstream media to gain liberal points, while actually doing damage control. And to the indy media, the wool is still over your eyes, wake up!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Slave Trade used to destroy the Middle Class
Posted by: Conan the Younger on Dec 27, 2005 11:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since the article did not mention it and only Lou Dobbs has mentioned it under its War on the Middle Class segment, I will. It is the use of economic slaves by corporations to attack the middle class. Who are these slaves; they are HB1s and illegal immigrants who come into the US to work for one half to two thirds of a citizen, no matter what the citizen is paid. Why are they paid so much less? It is because they don't have the full protection of the law. An employer can fire them and then they have 60 days to find a new job or face deportation back to where they came from. Also, HB1 status only lasts a few years and then they have to become a permanent resident, a citizen, or face deportation. Since many NH1s do get fired or don't manage to become permanent residents, they go into illegal immigrant status, just like the ones who are smuggled across our borders directly. Every person who is in this country illegally, is an economic slave and can be exploited as a slave. And since corporations are allowed by this government to dip into this slave labor market, the corporations do not have to pay the full cost of citizen labor by not hiring citizens. The bald-faced lie that illegals do the work that citizens won't do should be stated as Why hire a citizen when an illegal is available for half pay of a citizen?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Global Peak Oil and Iraq
Posted by: Conan the Younger on Dec 27, 2005 12:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is another that I haven't seen on any MSM and only sparingly on the net. Is the MSM afraid that if they made public the existence of global peak oil, they would also have to explain what the effects of doing nothing are? Would they be justly accused of inciting riot if they explained that doing nothing will result in the loss of billions of lives over the next twenty years as famine, disease, and war took their toil as oil and natural gas supplies top out and begin a gradual decline while demand continue to rise? Are they waiting for an alternative to Bush's Energy Wars before they explain to the world what is happening? After listening to Ted Koppel on Meet the Press on Sunday and reading the comments from the above poster from the news room, I would say the answer is YES!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Neglected Stories
Posted by: davidt on Dec 27, 2005 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't expect a corporation to detail what other corporations are dong to minimize government interference and maximize government largesse since they would be outling their own method of self-aggrandizement!

No where else, name a venue--police, firemen, teachers, lawyers, doctors, pharmacists, construction workers, civil servants--has the phrase "you scratch my back and I will scratch yours" been honed to a fine perfection than in the corporate world.

They ALL sleep with each other, they sit on each others' board of directors, they supply the votes when retirement packages and obscenley gargantuan lifetime "benies" are cast in stone.

This country is basically a contorted combination of a plutocracy & oligarchy that subsists by parasitizing any hapless victim of the classes "beneath" them until they are sucked dry, marrow and all, discarded and quickly replaced with a "selected" victim.

The beauty of all of this, in their eyes, is they will describe, extol, publicize, promote, excuse and deify this monster as a democracy that should be metastasized throughout every corner of the world. A world that should be grateful for this blessed "selection".

Why? Because corporatization's ultimate goal is to CONTROL the entire world.

Notice that we do NOT have a high-flying drama, not a shitcom, about a bigtime newspaper a la Lou Grant? Why? Newspapers are an endless fount of stories that any viewer can revel in.

They already tried a TV News show called The Beast and it was gritty, revealing and provacative, what they portray any celeb scandal as being when it is just worthless junk, with an excellent ensemble cast that has popped up in pieces in recent shows. It lasted 4 weeks.

Know why?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

theocracy
Posted by: Polly on Dec 27, 2005 9:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hi Geov,
I really disagree with your summation of the first 3 stories. Terri Schiavo and the alleged war on Christmas are not distractions. This country is being pushed towards a theocracy, these people are for real. They've been trying since the 80's and have found their man in Bush. Look at all the appointments of rightwing Christians to leadership in the CDC, FDA, and other scientific organizations. Read "With God on Their Side" by Esther Kaplan, read theocracywatch.org and worldcantwait.org. I find it disturbing that many changes towards imposing a narrow Christianity in this country are happening under the radar of many progressive people. Polly

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Malthusian Equation
Posted by: NoPCZone on Dec 27, 2005 10:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The great decline of the American Empire that began with the failure that was the Vietnam War (yes, we lost) is gaining steam and all we have is the same combo of Bread and Circuses that Rome offered up. Societies and cultures can change rapidly and ours is no exception. Just as humanity is only one generation from illiteracy, it's also only one generation from a return to the Dark Ages. The decline in our nation and world is real and is on a very steep slope.

Take the dilution of civil liberties, repressive banking and credit laws, a wreck of a public school system, a deflated currency in a country loaded with personal and public debt, an infotainment media culture, a public malaise with political involvement, a political party system for sale to the highest bidder, massive uncontrolled immigration a widening class chasm and you have a formula for disaster. That's just our side of the equation.

As our society becomes more indebted, socially and culturally stratified and poorly educated other countries are emerging. The Pacific Rim is the new world focus and our society is in decline even as these nations are becoming more educated, affluent and powerful. Not a pretty picture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Malthusian Equation Posted by: badkitty
At #11? To have watched Ann Coulter on Today.
Posted by: ridebalanced on Dec 27, 2005 10:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been stunned all day since I caught her spiel, Ann Coulter's, waiting for the weather report on our local weather spin off. Sorry folks, it was important business for me. But to realize how serious this feline of the carotid kill can evicorate easily and spin the neo-con version of what is right should did shock me. I am not easily shockable. This woman needs to rethink her definition of her ability to talk to this country.
I looked up her biography. I know what she has said and done. The media moguls let these hatred filled people spew truths, as they view their own venom, to do what? To fill our minds with yet more insanity? And accuse others of being crazy? To allow a blond Neo-Nazi whose narcissicim knows no boundaries to have a 60 second hold over the public mind?
Can I laugh at her, viewing Bush, et.al, or laugh at the company parent of the Today Show? No. I found it disgustingly buying into propaganda.
Number 11 should be what the media presents to their public as a wish to understand what it's really like for us "Average Joe's". The children of those who served in wars, sent our kids to war because of our belief that this country can be the best. Make these Noveau Riche shed their furs and live next to us as we balance groceries versus gasoline. They need a life beyond Wall Street and Washington. Make the media responsible for their written words also.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Reminds me a bit... Posted by: Asmodeus
New tech made it possible to share your thought.
Posted by: ridebalanced on Dec 27, 2005 11:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pessimists depress me. No Pollyanna here on my side yet. I'll "sigh" for us all. Waah! You are wrong. I do believe our world is much better than it was one hundred, two hundred, or one thousand years ago. Why? We're learning. 'Tis simple. You did it. Comparing the US of A to Rome is not where you can take your energy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What is coming? Posted by: ridebalanced
Ughh
Posted by: mindvsbody on Dec 27, 2005 11:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
good add on Pat Robertson, i cant stand him, with all the fucking stupid things he's said, peoples reactions only give him more publicity,he needs to keep his mouth shut, everyone is entitled to their opinion but i hate ideologue's who feel as they are the decision makers on behalf of everyone, especially him, with telling dover to not even to look to god, for what they have done, well Pat i hadnt notice that you were the good lords attourney.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

much credibility & reliability lost over the long term
Posted by: Smiggsy on Dec 28, 2005 10:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If and when more of the american public realise that these largely corporate owned mainstream media groups have not been telling the public the real news, or flat out making stuff up, these news organisations will lose so much credibility or reliability over the long term it will cause permanent damage to the value of these companies. It makes you wonder if these corporate owned news outlets "out for profit" are really a high-valued asset in the crowns of the parent companies, if they eventually become worthless. Should they now become more serious about the ethics & integrity of their journalism & reporting, including editorials.
Or simply morph into pure fictional entertainment.


Over the long term when people wake up to the fraudulant reporting & stop using particularly bad news sources, they will in dollars become practicially worthless except for maybe some of the plant/equipment in the truck or studios. Ad companies may then stop paying big money to them (to hang their wares off) & then some of these media groups that eventually nobody will believe, watch, listen or pay attention to due to their deplorable reputations will fold.

You can only fool the people for so long.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Death of Mainstream Media
Posted by: Pete29 on Dec 28, 2005 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Terry Schiavo and the Aruba chick get infinitely more media attention than Bush's Constitution-shredding NSA domestic spying program, the Downing Street Memos and the Supreme Court nomination of neo-monarchist Samuel Alito combined, the mainstream media can now be officially proclaimed dead--deader than Peter Jennings or Dan Rather's career.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another under reported issue: 2005 the year of the repeat sex offender
Posted by: AJS on Dec 28, 2005 11:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With another fat handful of known sex offenders killing our children, I am outraged at the media's inability to collectively shine a spotlight on the justice system's poor answer to reforming these criminals. How many children have to die before we reform this broken system. Maybe the real question is: Whose children have to suffer at the hands of known criminals before something changes? Maybe if a movie star or important politician's child is stolen from their bedroom in the middle of the night — then it would be considered a real problem worth discussing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where is Osama/earthquake in Kashmir
Posted by: badkitty on Dec 28, 2005 1:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmm, that earthquake in Kashmir/Pakistan was pretty devastating in the area where Osama is alleged to be, and we haven't heard anything about him since. Could the two be connected? Did some house or cave collapse on him? Just curious... Perhaps our state of the art intelligence agencies can enlighten us...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re:
Posted by: Asmodeus on Dec 28, 2005 1:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The news isn't about NEWS anymore folks. It's about money, just like everything else. Do you really think that if there was a huge groundbreaking story that said, for example, that Glaxo Smith-Klein knew a drug of theirs was killing people off and didn't care, that it would lead the news? Phone calls would be made and it would turn into a 10 sec. HealthBeat report about how you should ask your doctor to see what other GS-K drugs you should take instead.

They now have a heart medicine (sorry I don't remember the name, only the commercial and side effects...go fig eh?) that can *cause* heart attacks if you go off of it. I have yet to hear *anything* about that in the news. And this is just one of the areas where the news isn't news, it's ENTERTAINMENT.

I support a call for an Alternet network channel!! ;)

Asmodeus

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MSM defined
Posted by: DanaH1976 on Dec 28, 2005 5:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To the poster who was wondering: MSM means "mainstream media".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The worst of the worst
Posted by: chaoslegs on Dec 28, 2005 7:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Local TV newscast, especially during sweeps months. Talk about drivel, it makes the national news look halfway decent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

boblecht
Posted by: boblecht on Dec 29, 2005 11:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The biggest unreported/undiscussed story that incorporates most of the issues above is the Bush implementation of the Neo-Con vision of US Empire. Everything this administration has done that seems crazy makes perfect sense when placed in the framework of the Neo-Con master plan. This is not a consiracy theory--the Neo-Con agenda is clearly and openly stated and easily traced via Google. This agenda, simply put, advocates using preemptive force to counter any threat anywhere in the world to U.S. dominance economically, politically, or militarily. At every turn in the road toward this goal, corporations benefit at the expense of the citizens and the commonwealth. The goal is empire, and the tactics employed are fundamentally Fascist. Government of the people by the people for the people is on life support. It's been replaced by government of the people, by the corporations for the corporations. That is not democracy, it is Fascism--the most imminent threat to our Democracy that BOTH main stream AND alternate media fails to call by name. Who will raise the alarm if not AlterNet?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dr Strangelove Embraces Uranium
Posted by: Ghostly Dendrite on Dec 29, 2005 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has been reported, although not generally, that Uncle Sam has used an amount of uranium equivalent to 333,000 (three hundred and thirty three thousand) times the quantity of that contained in the Nagasaki bomb in the form of conventional weapons within the Afghanistan and Iraqi theatres.

Why is this rather specialised metal, more commonly associated with nuclear bombs and power plants used at all in conventional weapons? Firstly it is very dense and so will have increased momentum but more importantly, whereas most metals deform and blunt on impact, uranium is unique in self sharpening as it penetrates a target. A conventional uranium shell can penetrate twenty feet of steel reinforced concrete.
Well that sounds all right, after all one doesn’t go to war to play around; we are here to win and as quickly as possible, aren’t we? Unfortunately, as you might have guessed, there is a downside and that is radiation. International monitoring stations have recorded levels between 400% - 2000% higher than normal background levels within Afghanistan and Iraq. Not only that, but the particular uranium isotopes used have a half life of 4.5billion years. This means that after 4.5billion years, the 4,000,000lb (2000 tons) dropped on Iraq 2003 will have decreased to 1.000 tons and after a further 4.5 billion years it will have decreased again to 500 tons and so on.

Is this something we should worry about? The real fact is that because of the nuclear radiation, local people, call them indigenous, insurgents or what you will, are suffering terrible body and head pains. Babies are being born without brains and organs outside their bodies. Radiation is quite indiscriminate and will affect not only the intended victims but also the soldiers. Military personnel are returning home with a condition known as Burning Sperm Syndrome which is passed on to their sexual partners and leads to severely deformed offspring. Even though the Pentagon has an annual budget greater than most Third World countries GNP it considers a cost of $1.000 / test /soldier prohibitive. One has to ask if it is the cost or the backlash at the outrage such results would cause that is the problem.
Continued……..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dr Strangelove 2
Posted by: Ghostly Dendrite on Dec 29, 2005 12:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even though uranium is dense, explosions cause it to become microscopically fragmented and airborne. This airborne dust will eventually disperse north and south between the Caucuses and Saudi Arabia and east over the Stans; India and China. Over years, it could eventually engulf the globe in an On the Beach type scenario. Do you remember the fear that was fed into people at the possibility that Saddam might have biological weapons?
The story could have been suppressed to prevent mass panic or there may have been disagreements with the findings of the Uranium Medical Research Centre. It could have been considered unfair to compare the weights and therefore the effects of depleted or partially spent uranium with that of nuclear weapons grade uranium and this may have some validity. I do not know where the balance lies with this one. Weight for weight, there were 83.000 Nagasaki bomb equivalents used in Afghanistan and 250.000 used in Iraq making a total of 333.000 from the two. If we assume that depleted uranium is 1% as effective as weapons grade then that is equivalent to 3.330 Nagasaki bombs, if only 1/10.000 as effective then that is 33 Nagasaki bombs. What is important is that people, both local and soldiers are suffering terrible deaths in the Middle East and the instances of malformed babies are increasing both there and in the USA. This is not friendly fire, somebody accidentally getting in the way of the bullets, this is formulated policy.

If this conflict is what securing oil supplies after peak condition takes, then it is trading off a short term gain for a long term loss. Knowing what the American leadership has in store for you would you sooner have them behind you or in front of you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stupidstition
Posted by: Slowburn on Dec 31, 2005 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems that the story of the compilation of all the
stories not being told can its self tell us volumes. That is the descent into the new dark ages is well on its way. With the control of all three branches of government {Absolute power} it will snowball from here if free thinkers do not get physically involved in there futures[Protesters marching on the white house comes to mind.]. Mind control through superstition/stupidstition buy the right wing media is here it is now. Yes they figurd it out. Own the Media, Own religion, own the world. Hey! its just good business right? The hostile take over of the of the hearts and minds of the stupidstitios is almost complete. Thank the natural god that we were given free will so that some of us can see though what is happening today. But on the other hand mainstream media is now and will continue to control those that do not want the hassle of thinking for themselves. Can the descent back into the dark ages be reversed. Who knows! Maybe if we get up go out and do somthing about it? Courage and reason lifted man out of the dark ages once before it can do it again. Lets pray its not as bloody and brudish as it was the last time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Check this out for a new one of 2006
Posted by: farhada on Jan 2, 2006 6:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Check the following link for an interesting view of the latest "news" about the Iraqi teenager who left Florida to visit Iraq.

When you see all the different sources you start thinking that the story just doesn't make sence:

Jessica Lynch 2: Florida Teen Home After Iraq Adventure

How do you compare this kids jurney to Padila's Case?

/FaaB

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dereliction of Duty: the Mainstream Media
Posted by: shadow7 on Jan 2, 2006 6:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
TvNewsLIES has published a challenge to under-reported stories of the year, ever since the Bush theft of the presidency. Just take a look at last year's unanswered questions....and see that they remain UNANSWERED to this day.

CLICK HERE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]