Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

A Time to Impeach

By Doug Ireland, Direland. Posted December 20, 2005.


President Bush may find himself in deep trouble after ordering and defending illegal wiretaps of U.S. citizens -- a crime for which Richard Nixon was nearly impeached.
122105_story
Advertisement

When the U.S. Senate last Friday refused to renew the liberticidal Patriot Act -- with its provisions for spying on Americans' use of libraries and the Internet, among other Constitution-shredding provisions of that iniquitous law -- it was in part because that morning's New York Times had revealed how Bush and his White House had committed a major crime.

By ordering the National Security Agency -- the N.S.A, so secretive that in Washington its initials are said to stand for "No Such Agency" -- to wiretap and eavesdrop on thousands of American citizens without a court order, Bush committed actions specifically forbidden by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Passed in 1978 after the Senate's Church Committee documented in detail the Nixon administration's widespread use of U.S. intelligence agencies to spy on the anti-Vietnam war movement and other political dissidents, FISA "expressly made it a crime for government officials 'acting under color of law' to engage in electronic eavesdropping 'other than pursuant to statute.'", as the director of the Center for National Security Studies, Kate Martin, told the Washington Post this past weekend.

And the FISA statute required authorization of the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to make such domestic spying legal. Bush and his NSA sought no such authorization before invading American citizens' right to privacy -- a blatant flouting of the law that made both wavering Democrats and libertarian Republicans mad enough to vote against extending the hideous Patriot Act, which thankfully will now expire at the end of the year.

Bush not only acknowledged, and defended, this illegal eavesdropping in a Saturday radio address, he went further in a Monday morning press conference, saying he'd "suggested" it. But as Wisconsin Democratic Senator Russ Feingold -- who, together with conservative Idaho Republican Larry Craig, led the filibuster that defeated the Patriot Act's renewal -- said this weekend, "This is not how our democratic system of government works--the president does not get to pick and choose which laws he wants to follow."

But Bush had plenty of bipartisan help from Democratic co-conspirators in keeping knowledge of this illegal spying from reaching the American public. It began in November 2001, in the wake of 9/11, and -- from the very first briefing for Congressional leaders by Dick Cheney until today -- Democrats on the Senate and House Intelligence Committees were told about it. Those witting and complicit in hiding the crime included Democratic Senator John D. Rockefeller IV, former chairman and later ranking member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, former ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee. They knew it was a crime -- Rockefeller, for example, warned the administration against it -- and yet did not make it public. They were frightened by polls showing security hysteria at its height.


Digg!

Doug Ireland writes the blog, Direland.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
One problem we have a new Supreme Court which will overturn
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Dec 20, 2005 12:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nixon's case now, thanks to its new members. The president will be allow to do what ever he thinks is necessary to protect the American People. Marital law cannot be far behind this ruling, so we cannot hold elections in 2006 or something equally heinous. That is the point of bush bragging that he ordered this illegal act.

By the way, Rockefeller wrote a hand written letter to Cheney saying he disagreed with is act. He sealed and dated it. You can read it on HuPo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clarification
Posted by: cardboardurinal on Dec 20, 2005 1:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although Nixon would have been impeached, he resigned before charges were ever brought up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Clarification--and another? Posted by: John Rice
» RE: Clarification Posted by: vertglnt
I Heard The Bells On Christmas Day
Posted by: Tom Degan on Dec 20, 2005 3:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The other night, as George W. Bush concluded his address from the oval office, he ended it by quoting the old civil war era Christmas carol, I Heard The Bells On Christmas Day:
The wrong will fail
And right prevail
With peace on earth
Good will toward men....
Yeah, beautiful. Leave it to these guys to take something as beuatiful as that tune out of context. He wouldn't have dared to quote that song in its entirety. Had he done that he would have had to recite these timely words:
And in despair I bowed my head,
"There is no peace on earth", I said
For hate is strong
And mocks the song
Of peace on earth
Good will towards men.
Oh well, I'm sure his heart was in the right place....I'm kidding. His heart is never in the right place, is it?

Happy Christmas, everyone.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Five Months Later.... Posted by: Tom Degan
He needs to be indicted.
Posted by: WhatNow? on Dec 20, 2005 3:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To hell with impeachment, this war criminal needs to be indicted at the very least for the mass murder of Iraqis. The invasion of Iraq reminds me of the nazi german invasion of Poland.

bush is thumbing his nose at every decent person on the planet in my opinion. He does not even try to lie about his criminality anymore. He flaunts it to the entire world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: He needs to be indicted. Posted by: John Rice
» RE: He needs to be indicted. Posted by: badkitty
» RE: He needs to be indicted. Posted by: flybeast79
» RE: He needs to be indicted. Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: He needs to be indicted. Posted by: flybeast79
» RE: He needs to be indicted. Posted by: linuxluver
» RE: He needs to be indicted. Posted by: pelamela
» RE: He needs to be indicted. Posted by: jess4me@verizon.net
» RE: He needs to be indicted. Posted by: jrbales
Ken
Posted by: kencohen on Dec 20, 2005 4:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Bush appears to be manifesting personality disorder symptoms quite similar to Mr Nixon including megalomanic tendencies, denying wrongdoings and blaming others. Both presidents created their own reality (delusions) justifying their behavior.
Mr. Bush appears to be writing the laws (in his own mind) he then proclaims justifies his actions as legal. Clearly, the law he violated was written expressly to prevent future presidents (after Nixon) from unilaterally trampling American Citizen's civil liberties. Emboldened by being allowed to unilaterally and pre-emptively invade a sovereign nation planted the seeds of entitlement to now unilaterally and pre-emptively invade our civil liberties. How could he argue that he is acting to protect us against terrorists whan at the same time he receives failing grades in impementing the 9/11 Commission's recommendations.
Rigging election returns, presenting selective, unvetted CIA intelligence to justifying invading Iraq, leaking sensitive CIA operatives names might be soft, difficult to prove allegations. However, authorizing eavesdropping without getting the necessary warrants is a clear violation of Constitutional law that rises to a high crime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ken Posted by: gonzoskismet
» RE: Ken Posted by: Pepper
» RE: Ken Posted by: La Fargian
» RE: Ken Posted by: kencohen
» RE: Ken Posted by: mr. joshua
» RE: Ken Posted by: kencohen
» RE: Ken Posted by: kencohen
nope.
Posted by: tcx2 on Dec 20, 2005 4:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Won't happen. It can't happen. We've come so far, and we're almost at armageddon with Iran and Israel and whatnot. Must persist!

Really, what would we do without this morally bankrupt anti-Christ for a president?

Sure has been an interesting five years. Here's to a few more. If we can make it past the new year, of course.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: nope. Posted by: gonzoskismet
» RE: Anti-Messiah remark... Posted by: SevenStarHand
» RE: nope. Posted by: dajson
» RE: nope. Posted by: hdevos
DICTATOR AND DEMAGOGUE
Posted by: Bushhater on Dec 20, 2005 4:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush claims extraordinary powers to protect the country. Hitler said exactly the same thing in 1933. Bush, in his own words said, "running the government would be easier in a dictatorship, as long as I'm the dictator". Bush also proclaims the 'divine right of kings', since he declares God anointed him to be president . Well, guess what folks, we now have a real-life Hitler with a messiah complex turning the USA into a fascist police state. We need to IMPEACH AND JAIL this would-be fuhrer into his own gulag of secret prisons without his day in court since he believes that enemies of the state are forever beyond legal recouse without any judical review.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DICTATOR AND DEMAGOGUE Posted by: Trainer12
» RE: DICTATOR AND DEMAGOGUE Posted by: BriMan
» RE: DICTATOR AND DEMAGOGUE Posted by: justgreenleaf
Danger of precedent
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Dec 20, 2005 4:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
President Bush should be impeached. If he is not, it will set a precedent that will allow future presidents to ignore the Constitution. I remember that Nixon defenders tried to argue that because, I think it was Andrew Jackson, wasn't impeached Nixon shouldn't be impeached. We must be very careful that politicians are held strictly accountable. Law is built on precedent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Danger of precedent Posted by: amazed again
» RE: Danger of precedent Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Danger of precedent Posted by: Fade
» RE: Danger of precedent Posted by: scotting4321
What about you???
Posted by: Zemiti on Dec 20, 2005 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has it occured to you all that the NSA may be spying on AlterNet and scrutinising all mail coming in on this comment line? Look hard and you'll find it all out....as for this pisskop megalomaniac and his bunch of goons in the White House, assisted and abetted by their "see no evil" press, the moment of reckoning has come; if and only if the American public can stand up and toss out this threat to world peace and stability now! I have a constantly recurring horrofic picture playing itself in my mind: Bush toying with the button to nuclear Armageddon when he is bored, run out of ideas or something to do, or has just had a lousy day. Can the world afford that luxury; what luxury??! Toss the chump now!....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What about you??? Posted by: ghoster
» RE: What about you??? Posted by: tcx2
» RE: What about you??? Posted by: Pepper
» RE: What about you??? Posted by: robchapman
» RE: What about you??? Posted by: giles
» RE: What about you??? Posted by: gonzoskismet
» RE: What about you??? Posted by: Kitty Lady Oregon
» RE: What about you??? Posted by: Riverside
» RE: What about you??? Posted by: Fade
» RE: What about you??? Posted by: gdwkaw
Consider
Posted by: kfl on Dec 20, 2005 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that Bushfuehrer and corporate pals are hiding something from the FISA court. It would have to be quite heinous, given the fact that the court usually approves everything requested. Are they employing Pointdexter's TIA (total information awareness) plan? Are the victims of their spying currently being tortured? What's beneath all this sneak and peak? I'll bet it's rated XXXX.

karen

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Consider Posted by: Pepper
» RE: Consider Posted by: jgr4
Looks like a corporation to me...
Posted by: navistic50 on Dec 20, 2005 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't help but laugh (instead of crying) watching Bush in action. He acts like a CEO to me, albeit , one along the lines of Enron.

He is in my opinion well past due for impeachment, and yes he should be charged as a felon as well. He is a war criminal. Many, many people have died needlessly in a war that shows the depth of greed and is a great shame on "We The People".

America has suffered terribly for the past 5 years , and our own fears have been turned against us by those who are by definition "Sworn to Protect and uphold the law". Big Oil, Arms companies, and the many support industries have had their finger in this to, but half of the country would go out of business if we arrested those involved.

Impeach Bush, Indict his cronies, and let's take our country back, where it belongs, with the American people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

courts?
Posted by: benrichmond on Dec 20, 2005 5:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The House Impeaches, the Senate decides; why do you raise the issue of the court? I'm not one who is eager for impeachment, but this is a flagrant violation of law, and (unlike Nixon), Bush is bragging on it. This is a clear and present danger to our democracy, and the House must impeach.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: courts? Posted by: Germanicus
Dems must define bush as illegal bordering on criminal...
Posted by: FFA on Dec 20, 2005 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
King George says that merely because he has the security, safety and best interest of America at heart, we must grant him ANY POWERS, ANY tactics (up to and including torture, secret arrests and detentions, unlimited spying), and the Democrats HAVE YET TO FORMULATE an expression of outrage or resistance to this incredible usurpation of America's proud legacy of freedom and democratic rights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeachment is a joke
Posted by: robchapman on Dec 20, 2005 6:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Historically, impeachment is a device used by the GOP against Democratic Presidents who offenf their moral sensibilities. It is a joke.

Should an impeachment proceeding against Bush somehow get underway the corrupt and sychophantic GOP House leadership would crush it and Bush would be able to claim his actions were not crininal.

We must stop Bush politically. Working at the State level to elect opposition (ie, Democratic and liberal Republican) figures into state legislatures and as Governors will seriously impede the GOP agenda domestically and provide strength in the upcoming battles against the federals.

Secondly, we must have confidence in ourselves and not depend on the big people in Washington to cure this disease.

Our institutions that provide the very same things that have made us free and prosperous, an open society, respect for the individual, freedom to pursue opportunity without governmental supervision or interference and the right to hold the leaders of business as well as government accountable.

Bush has weakened each and every one of those essential rights.

In the age of globalization, how can American business prosper when foreigners fear their international conversations with us may be monitored by the NSA?

Bush has pushed us down the slope that will quickly lead to poverty and isolation.

Ask your friends whether they are willing to live with the potential BUSINESS consequences of Bush's rush toward a totalitarian state, and when they realize how much money Bush's spying program could cost them, they will end it.

Robert Chapman
Lansing, New York

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Impeachment is a joke Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Impeachment is a joke Posted by: flybeast79
» RE: Impeachment is a joke Posted by: maxpayne
» the Bush legacy Posted by: vespasian01
what's so sad
Posted by: geming on Dec 20, 2005 6:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His approval ratings have shot up during this scandal. The mob loves his rough-and toughness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: what's so sad Posted by: Pepper
» RE: what's so sad Posted by: tcx2
» RE: what's so sad Posted by: brunowe
» RE: what's so sad Posted by: ConnecttheDots
This President this weekend said "he has the power in time of war"!
Posted by: Pepper on Dec 20, 2005 6:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why has NO ONE MENTIONED that there is no declared war upon which he may exercise that power as Commander in Chief?

No one, not the press, not those in opposition, and even the general public has not mentioned it at all and that is the crux of it. Only Congress can declare an official war and only then do war powers kick in. The war we are in is illegal and in May 2003 the pResident in the WH declared the "illegal war over and won". Remember?

The constitution is clear about how we go into an official war. Right there is the simple solution to stopping this man/lizard/nifilim.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Exactly Posted by: kfl
» Hey don't knock the NEPHILIM Posted by: fifthworld
Be Worth the Show
Posted by: gonzoskismet on Dec 20, 2005 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just want to see it happen. Don't care if it works or not. The thing about an impeachment ATTEMPT is that so much other, juicer tid-bits tend to ooze out of the woodwork. Some a lot more interesting than the impeachment charges. I'm waiting for the dam on this cesspool to burst.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Be Worth the Show Posted by: Ellie1
otto
Posted by: otto on Dec 20, 2005 6:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've also just read an article saying that the Bush administration had been wiretapping the UN, to find out who would be against the war in Iraq and what arguements they would use.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What About you?
Posted by: Ellie1 on Dec 20, 2005 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Bush and his chumps are checking alternet, good. F all of you. Everytime I think we have had all the Bushit he can come up with, Bush adds another nail in the coffin. I can't express how angry I am at 52% of the American people for voting for this bastard. THERE IS NO UNDERESTIMATING THE INTELLIGENCE OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What About you? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: What About you? Posted by: badkitty
» RE: What About you? Posted by: gonzoskismet
» 52%? Not likely Posted by: fifthworld
What Areantes said...
Posted by: deha on Dec 20, 2005 7:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks. Sounds like you're inside my head, as I have the same feelings about the 52%. Compounding the issue for me is the fact that most of my loved ones are amongst them, vehemently so.

The holidays will be fun this year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What Areantes said... Posted by: Xynyx
TagsNOLA
Posted by: TagsNOLA on Dec 20, 2005 7:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You guys are missing the boat. It's Cheney who has to go before Bush. HE is the brains behind this neo-Con aniti-Constitutional cabal. If you impeach Bush, then you get Cheney as Commander-in-Chief. You get him in the Whitehouse, forget about the Consititution. It will be all-out war against Iran and the world would be plunged into a war like the 100 years war in Europe. Cheney is a passionate exponent of "the clash of civilizations." He knows he is in poor health and he is on a MISSION (from God) to throw this world into a new dark age before he dies. Getting rid of Bush solves nothing if we get Cheney in the Whitehouse in his stead.
TagsNOLA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: TagsNOLA Posted by: spider
» RE: TagsNOLA Posted by: cyclone
» RE: TagsNOLA Posted by: CatDad
Ha
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Dec 20, 2005 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually Alternet isn't that threatening to the powers-that-be. Very few people comment on here about the demolition of the world trade center and other stuff like that, even though there is a massive amount of physical evidence to support such a radical statement. The general discussion even on this site is heavily influenced by "mainstream thought", which means that most people here are too afraid to ask the right questions and look in the right places for those bits of truth that really are right in front of us.

It is not really mainstream thought I'm talking about though; it is controlled thought. Very few will question where that control comes from and how it propagates through our society. Those that do are probably the biggest threat.

Michael Moore tried to illustrate this point in BFC when he talked about how only the petty thugs made the nightly news. "A black man" this and "a black man" that... Not only is the news biased against poor, it is also racist. We are far more likely to address the racist side of the issue.

And then there's people like Alex Jones who put forth a very strong argument for how even people like Michael Moore are a part of this "controlled society". He believes that Moore was trying to make Bush look like a bumbling idiot who took too many vacations. Moore carefully avoided making any type of accusation that Bush knowingly and willfully allowed crimes to be commited in the name of massive profits. Utterly... massive... profits.

We all know what the top .1% is doing to the rest of the world, and yet somehow the idea of killing 3000 people and then completely covering it up to make hundreds of billions of dollars is too sinister a thought?... It makes no sense to me that anyone could believe that there isn't anyone out there who would kill without hesitation for a billion dollars.

But anyway the big questions don't really get asked here very often, so no, Alternet isn't that great a threat to the status quo. It is possible that Bush could be impeached and it is even more possible that nothing will change as a result. This has happened before hasn't it? With Nixon? After a brief lull the fascists came back with a vengeance and unleashed a brutal assault on this country in the form of the Reagan admin. Trillion dollar scandals became commonplace. And the middle class has been losing ground and voting against their own economic interests ever since.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ha Posted by: Lincoln fan
» btw Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: btw Posted by: Pepper
» RE: Ha Posted by: tcx2
» RE: Ha Posted by: Doubtom
NIXONIFICATION
Posted by: karihari on Dec 20, 2005 8:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I AM NOT A CROOK devolves into I WAS CROOKIFYING TO PREVENT TRERROISM AT HOME AND ABROAD. The scary thought is if BUSH were impeached that would give CHENEY complete and absolute power. Checks and balances are now blank checks in invisible ink. KARIN

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NIXONIFICATION Posted by: gonzoskismet
Impeachment?
Posted by: speedreader58 on Dec 20, 2005 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is he impeachable? I personally think he is committable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Impeachment? Posted by: BillC
One more thing
Posted by: redstarwraith on Dec 20, 2005 8:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article forgot to mention that it took the New York Times a whole year to get up the intestinal fortitude to make this all public. A WHOLE YEAR! One might also ask more of these institutions (our press, etc.) in the way of keeping the public informed. I'd always thought that a well-informed public was essential to a healthy democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One more thing Posted by: cyclone
cheney was involved
Posted by: quixotic on Dec 20, 2005 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
see rockefeller's memo to cheney on yahoo news. if we can delay the proceedings until after we elect a democratic congress in 2006, we could be saying "hello president pelosi"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: cheney was involved Posted by: Pepper
Dictatorial Powers
Posted by: kfl on Dec 20, 2005 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
www.epluribusmedia.org
Read the article on The Ides of December. Smoke, Mirrors and War Powers.
This article is a must read for those who are hoping the House initiates articles of impeachment. It may be too late. While we were sleeping, the Bushfuehrer and his legions rode into our dreams. We're now living a nightmare.

karen

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dictatorial Powers Posted by: flybeast79
What do we need to do . . .
Posted by: RosieRivetor on Dec 20, 2005 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to get this Fascist master of lies out of an office he never won in the first place? They cheated to gain power, their actions are contrary to everything this country was founded on, they lie and cheat in everything they do and they have made common American citizens the enemy of the world. I keep thinking "how much more can they get away with?" and yet, everyday I read more of how they desecrate our Constitution. I’m tired of the simplistic idea that anyone against his behavior and actions is left wing. Believing in our country, fighting for our principles, standing up for what is ethically correct is not liberal, it is human. The right wing are not human, they are hate mongers hiding behind the bible. Ironically, they only represent like 15% of the population, the same percent of the population identified as gay. They are far from a majority. The rest of us, the ones that are not polarized in our ideas, THE MAJORITY, need to raise our voices together and say “We did not vote you in, but there you sit. You may have cheated before but this time, we caught you. You are fired you Fascist, racist piece of garbage”. Impeach the bastard!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What do we need to do . . . Posted by: flybeast79
We need purge centrists in the Democratic party first before we can impeach Bush
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 20, 2005 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First give the Democrats victories in the Senate. 3 of the most potential seats to knock out Republicans is MT, OH, and PA. Also, knock out Joe Lieberman and other centrist Democrats in the primaries itself, House and Senate, and replace them with real Democrats. Remember, it's the centrists in the party and the Republicans who have been keeping Bush in power these past 5 years.

P.S.: And don't worry about Diebold. If Brown or Hackett can pervade the state, rural, suburban, and urban, no amount of diebolding can affect him. Remember, Kerry didn't touch rural Ohio, only concentrated on the urban areas. That's why the bastards at Diebold were able to pick their targets which would have been difficult to do statewide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Outstanding idea! Posted by: DFrost
» RE: Outstanding idea! Posted by: maxpayne
Whenever You People Are Ready
Posted by: woodford54 on Dec 20, 2005 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [