Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

What I Want For Christmas

By Jim Hightower, Hightower Lowdown. Posted December 22, 2005.


Santa, don't bring me any stuff. The one and only thing I want is this: A real Democratic party, alive and kicking!
122205b_storya
What I Want For Christmas

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Jim Hightower

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Dear Santa: There are so many toys I'd love to find under my tree this year! All kinds of new kitchen gizmos have caught my eye, and a bunch of CDs have caught my ear. Oh, I love gardening stuff, too. Plus, I hear there's a little robot that goes to the fridge and gets a beer for you -- could I have one of those? Pleeeeeze. There are so many things, and I know I can't be greedy and ask for them all, so I've been making a list of my very top favorites.

But last night as I was looking over my list ... I suddenly tore it up! Ripped the whole thing to bits and trashed it. I still like toys, mind you, but well, we live in a weird time, don't we Santa?

Even if I got everything on my list, by Christmas afternoon I'd be asking myself: Is that all there is? I don't mean I'd want more stuff. Stuff is the problem! Stuff is an insidious diversion, and it's so ... so ... so unsatisfying.

I need -- we need, our country needs something much bigger to strive for than mere possessions. There's a widespread hunger for a sense of national commitment and purpose. We need a connection to a common effort that'll enlist us to stop Washington's and Wall Street's abandonment of our egalitarian values, that'll reverse the growing sense most of us have that our America is headed in the wrong direction, that'll rekindle our democratic idealism.

So, Santa, bring me no stuff. Instead, the one and only thing I want is this: A REAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY, ALIVE AND KICKING!

It's not enough to wail about what the Bushites are doing to our country. Yes, it's awful they're brazenly ransacking our public treasury and giving the loot to the rich, they have us mired in a macho-maniacal war to make the world safe for Halliburton, they're sawing the rungs off the ladder of upward mobility for the poor and the middle class, they're defoliating our environmental and safety protections, they're gutting labor and consumer laws, they're deliberately defunding our public infrastructure, they're militarizing both the federal budget and our society, they're supplanting our basic liberties with executive autocracy, they're enthroning corporate supremacy through trade scams and stacked courts, they're ... well, the list goes on and on.

But what did we expect? As I wrote when Bush first began to run for president in 1999, "George W is an absolute corporate wet dream" and an ardent "practitioner of crony capitalism." Throughout their careers, BushCheney&Company have always been loyal corporate servants and always will be. That's why they were put there. Santa, here's the question people ask me everywhere I go: "Where the hell are the Democrats?"

Lost in Washington

With no strong national voice, Democratic officials in Congress now proclaim themselves to be the leaders and conscience of the party. God help us.

These people dwell in selfimposed exile inside the Beltway, operating under the sad delusion that they're actually a part of the government. In most cases, their backbones have been drained of any populist commitment they might once have had and filled with both corporate cash and the corporate agenda (from the Iraq war to the anticonsumer bankruptcy bill, most of the Bushite horrors have been abetted either actively or passively by congressional Democrats). They seem incapable of standing tall for the vast constituency that desperately needs them, instead slinking behind the skirts of clueless consultants and fundraisers who keep advising them to put forth only the meekest, corporate-approved, don't-rock-the-boat proposals. At a time when we should be setting off big caliber ideas, Democratic leaders are firing pea shooters.

A fellow named Doyle, who is a Lowdowner from Kansas, put it well in an email to me: "I've pretty well gone blind looking for leadership from my party these days. How come my yellow dog has strayed so far from home?"

The American public is looking for an honest answer to that, Doyle. It's fun to watch Tom DeLay get pinched and Karl Rove get squeezed, and it puts a big grin on every Democrat's face to see George W's poll numbers sink like a Mafia corpse in the East River. But the party's old guard and in-house operatives can forget trying to skate by on a campaign slogan of "We're Not Them."

First of all, they are them. Congressional Democrats are mired in the same swamp of corporate money that has sucked up the Republican party, and Democrats have shown (with some notable and encouraging exceptions) that they cannot be trusted to vote for the people's interest over corporate power. This is why voter esteem for Democrats has not risen as the GOP's numbers have fallen.

Second, and most important, people are not shopping for the best of the worst. Folks are yearning for integrity, for deep change in how the system operates ... and for whom. Being the "anti" party not only is a loser, but it's also fundamentally dishonest and a craven abandonment of the Democratic party's essential democratic role in our nation's history. Americans don't want merely to be "aginners," but to be FOR a party -- to be for it because it is clearly for the people, and better yet, is the people.

What I want

Santa, a lot of people are drawing up lists of issues and tinkering with language to clarify what the Democratic party should be for. That's good, but I think there's another, more important starting point: First, send me a party that knows WHO it is for.

"Everyone" is not an answer. As we've learned from recent experience, a party can't be "for" working families if it doesn't have the guts to declare war on the corporate thieves who're stealing the middle-class possibilities of those families. It can't be "for" the poor if it constantly caves in to the wishes of the bankers, Wal-Marters, developers and others who keep running over the poor. It can't be for small farmers if it lacks the stomach to con front the middleman giants that are squeezing the life out of those farm families. A party has to choose sides.

My wish is for a Democratic party that chooses to reconnect with its populist roots, recognizing that its only real reason for existence is to be the unabashed, unequivocal, unrelenting representative of its core populist constituency, including America's working stiffs, the middle class (this means the 60% of the country who have incomes of less than $55,000 a year), the poor (a fast-growing constituency, unfortunately), small farmers and local business, old folks and children, grunts and veterans, and proponents of clean air and water.

Corporations and the millionaire class already have a party -- and notice that it is relentless in its devotion to their interests, including the open raid the GOP is presently making on our public treasury to grab another $146 billion for tax giveaways, 97% of which will go to the wealthiest 4% of Americans (more than half goes to the richest one-tenth of one percent). These fortunate few are doing fine; they don't need another party's help.

But the great majority of people whose incomes are not even keeping up with inflation, the families working three or more jobs trying to stay afloat, the folks who actually feel the squeeze of ripoff gasoline and heating prices, the young people who see college education priced beyond their reach while also seeing their middle-class opportunities being callously offshored to China and India, the growing number of families with either no health coverage or practically useless coverage -- these and so many more desperately need a party that is wholly theirs, not owned or leased by the monied elites.

It's reported that Democratic congressional leaders are scrambling to come up with a message and slogan to spiff up the party's image for next year's elections -- sort of like a corporate branding campaign. House leaders tried this last year with the clarion call "New Partnership for America's Future." You saw how well that worked out. Instead of turning to PR firms, how about just saying something genuine that'll go straight to the heart of the populist base, which now feels politically homeless? Here's my entry, free of charge: "WE'RE ON YOUR SIDE."

That's what people want to know by word and deed. Why not say it plainly to them and then show that the party means it?

Are Americans really conservative?

The second thing I really, really want, Santa, is a Democratic party that's not afraid of its own grassroots. The Washington cognoscenti the pundits and the politicos -- have decreed that America is a center-right country. Thus, they intone sonorously and ceaselessly, it is sheer folly for Democrats to base their appeal on anyone more progressive than middle- of-the-road, party-switching, SUVdriving, suburbanites whose chief concern is traffic gridlocks.

Astonishingly, party elders have bought this load of bunkum , in large part because they mostly huddle with their consultants, big campaign donors, and others who peddle the bunkum. If they were instead to venture outside the Beltway, outside the safe pods of the national fund-raising circuit, and outside the echo chambers of their orchestrated "town meetings" -- if they were to talk with and listen to regular workaday people -- they would be astonished to find a different America than they think they're in. Contrary to the contrived wisdom of the cognoscenti, the American majority is amazingly progressive ... and pissed off.

How progressive? It doesn't get covered by the corporate media (imagine that), but mainstream polls consistently find that big majorities of Americans are not meek centrists, but overt, tub-thumping, FDR progressives who are seeking far more populist gumption and governmental action than any Democratic congressional leader or presidential contender has dared to imagine. In recent polls by the Pew Research Group, the Opinion Research Corporation, the Wall Street Journal, and CBS News, the American majority has made clear how it feels. Look at how the majority feels about some of the issues that you'd think would be gospel to a real Democratic party:

  1. 65 percent say the government should guarantee health insurance for everyone -- even if it means raising taxes.
  2. 86 percent favor raising the minimum wage (including 79 percent of selfdescribed "social conservatives").
  3. 60 percent favor repealing either all of Bush's tax cuts or at least those cuts that went to the rich.
  4. 66 percent would reduce the deficit not by cutting domestic spending but by reducing Pentagon spending or raising taxes.
  5. 77 percent believe the country should do "whatever it takes" to protect the environment.
  6. 87 percent think big oil corporations are gouging consumers, and 80 percent (including 76 percent of Republicans) would support a windfall profits tax on the oil giants if the revenues went for more research on alternative fuels.
  7. 69 percent agree that corporate offshoring of jobs is bad for the U.S. economy (78 percent of "disaffected" voters think this), and only 22% believe offshoring is good because "it keeps costs down."
  8. 69 percent believe America is on the wrong track, with only 26 percent saying it's headed in the right direction.


Americans might not call themselves progressive -- but there they are. On the populist, pocketbook issues that are rooted in our nation's core values of fairness and justice, there's a progressive super-majority. It flourishes in red states as well as blue, cutting through the establishment's false dichotomy of liberal/ conservative.

It's also a pissed-off super-majority, for its views are treated with infuriating disdain by the whole political system -- including corporatized Democrats who minimize and trivialize the grassroots populist fervor. By routinely dismissing the boldly progressive views of the people as unworthy of consideration, much less action, the political elites are coldly dismissing the people themselves and saying, "You don't matter."

Knock, knock

Hello ... Democrats. That knocking sound you hear echoing across America's political landscape is the BAM-BAM-BAM of opportunity pounding at your door, demanding an answer. So, Santa, this brings me to the third wonderful present I'd like to find under the tree: A Democratic party that will open its ears to the insistent knocking, recognize it for what it is, and (dare we hope?) lift its butt from the easy chair and open the damn door!

The simmering anger of a scorned majority offers a transforming opportunity in American politics, and it's there for the Democrats' taking if -- and only if -- the party is willing to stand forthrightly for workaday people, presenting a clear, uncompromised choice between the Common Good and Corporate Greed.

If the party knows, with clarity and conviction, who it stands for, then it will know what it stands for. The people themselves know the basics of what they want, so that would become the party's defining agenda. It would include:

Healthcare for all, taking on drug-company price gougers, insurance leeches, HMOs, etc.

Good jobs at good pay, going up against the low-wage economy, union bashers, job exporters, etc., to rebuild middle- class opportunities.

Put America to work rebuilding America, providing middle-class jobs to restore our nation's vital infrastructure, refurbish our parks, develop energy independence through renewable resources and conservation, etc.

Strength through education, making a full national commitment to having the most educated citizenry in the world, including assuring small classroom size, recruiting and retaining top teachers, providing free computers to every student, and extending the concept of free high school upward to college and higher technical training for all who want it.

Restore democracy, providing public funding for all campaigns, requiring national standards and funding to make it easy for everyone to vote (and have their votes count), cracking down on cronyism and corruption between lobbyists and office holders, providing Instant Runoff Voting, etc.

Make America strong, rebuilding our government's ability to cope competently with disasters, restoring our nation's commitment to civil liberties and the highest moral standards, reinvesting in clean air and water, assuring retirement security for all, etc.

There is no shortage of particular tasks to take on, from war to tax reform, but the common theme for a revived Democratic party is that it would unite the great majority of people around America's historic ethic of the Common Good. In stark contrast to the Bushites' laissez-faire ethic -- all of us on our own, let the strongest thrive, goodbye and good luck -- Democrats should spread the democratic gospel that our country is always strongest when all of us truly believe that we count, that we're all in this together, and that our society's policies are firmly rooted in America's egalitarian values of economic fairness, social justice, and equal opportunity for all. That's a Democratic party that ordinary folks could call their own again. And it's a party that would matter in the big scheme of things.

Santaland

So, Santa, wouldn't this be a better project for all of your elves to work on than another sack of toys? I know that a lot of people would say to me, "Gosh, Jimbo, you know Santa doesn't really exist. You're setting yourself up for a big disappointment."

I disagree. I think there's a little Santa within all of us. So our job is not just to make a wish list and hope that some party "leaders" will magically deliver it to us, but to become elves ourselves and build this party that we want, piece by piece. It's a daunting challenge -- but it's worth the prize, and worthy of our efforts.

From The Hightower Lowdown, edited by Jim Hightower and Phillip Frazer, December 2005.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Jim Hightower is the author of "Let's Stop Beating Around the Bush" (Viking Press). He publishes the monthly Hightower Lowdown; for more information about Jim, visit jimhightower.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A treat to read a no nonsense approach to what is needed to win
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Dec 22, 2005 1:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are so many good things to be said about this article. I love the list of things we need to ask for in a candidate. It is well thought out and each of us need to decide what we want in candidates and it still goes back to grassroots campaigning. We need to work for those people who support what we believe in.

I hear progressive used more and more by democrats, but what does than mean? Most people do not know what progressive stands for and this article speaks to that need to know. Everyone is right about middle of the road candidates, if they are not willing to take definite stands, then we need someone else, that includes Hillary.

Molly Ivins and Tim Hightower are part of Texas politics and they make us laugh at silly poor George. In Texas the primaries come in March. Someone emailed me today that they filed run governor and ask for my support as a campaign worker. My first question is who are you and what do you stand for? This was not something he bothered to include. He is running against the present governor's record, but this does not tell anyone who he is and what he believes.

This is a really big state and it is very hard to reach all the people. Winning depends on those of us who are the grassroots level for a candidate to win statewide. Texans are not unique, not matter what the Republicans in Washington believe, so I am sure this is it true of every other state in the Union.

Now is the time to find out who is running in your primaries and what do they stand for. Green, progressive, or purple independents candidates need our help to rebuild our governments on all levels. I do not believe a third party can win in a national race. One thing The West Wing has shown us, a person with good ideas and moral values could win. 19 states including Ohio have pass paper trail laws.

Something everyone should be interested in is who is going to oppose Tom DeLay. When he redrew the district lines, he spread out our district, so that it goes all over the place. He depended on his power to get reelected when he did this. There are a lot of poor, minority and democrats in his new district. Hopefully he will go to jail for one of his major criminal scandals now working thru legal system before this election. Sugar Land does not have paper trail voting machines.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

very commendable, very commendable
Posted by: Bushhater on Dec 22, 2005 3:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's such a delight to read Hightower and recommend his books, blogs, and lowdown to all. He hits a bullseye at all times. Sadly, but true, today's Dems have the spine of a jellyfish and in the worst way need to grow a pair of balls. Hightower for prez in '08!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the best you can hope for
Posted by: vespasian01 on Dec 22, 2005 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jim, the best you can hope for is term-limits on Fed Congress. In the main, the present stock of Republicans have only a thinly veiled revulsion for Constitutional protections. The Democrats, except for a manly few, are hopelessly outgunned; most of them (examples: Biden, Lieberman) appear as abused children, wanting only to apologize to their GOP masters for any original thought which may have crossed their minds. Lieberman, in particular, bane of retirees, is a nasty example. If this old democratic crud can be shovelled out of the voting chambers anytime soon, perhaps a viable opposition will fill the void. Until then, the Republicans will rule the roost.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Forward this to Howard Dean
Posted by: Urstrly on Dec 22, 2005 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Expresses my wishes exactly. I must say the Senate is getting my hopes up--a little.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Progressive Democratic Party
Posted by: robchapman on Dec 22, 2005 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Mr. Hightower and fellow readers:
as a Democratic activist I spend a lot of time working to build a Democratic party.
I think it is our fate as a party to be somewhat disorganized on and idealogical basis.
This is because of the breadth of our reach and support.
The American people support Progressive ideas and Democrats would be the majority party if the population were proportionately represented in the legislatures and particularly in muncipalities.
But the fact is that the legislative branch on the state and federal levels is designed specifically to assure conservative dominance. The large number of Senators elected from sparsely populated states assures that the Democrats must either have a robust conservative wing or they must concede the majority to the GOP.
The picture on the municipal level is even worse.
In my own State of New York, for example, NYC has a mayor and the Village of Lansing, here in rural Central New York, also has a mayor.
Obviously the Mayor of New York is immensely more powerful than the Mayor of Lansing, but the mayor of Lansing receives a salary of several thousand dollars and can use her influence on behalf of the GOP.
Multiply this by 16 GOP Town supervisors (unincorporated town mayors) and maybe 50 GOP county legislators in this Central New York county and you begin an idea of the magnitude of the GOP cadre that is operating on behalf of their party at TAXPAYER EXPENSE.
It is not to say that progressive candidates cannot win at the municipal level in rural and suburban counties, they can, but moderates and conservatives have a much much better shot.
The progressive movement, in my opinion, needs to find a way to build a coalition with moderate and conservative small town politicians, bring them into our party councils and begin a true and lasting majority.
Both ideological sides will benefit from this cross-fertilization.

Robert Chapman
Lansing, New York

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Progressive lexicon Posted by: vespasian01
I missed Jim
Posted by: GeoffW on Dec 22, 2005 7:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was wondering to myself lately where Mr. Hightower had gone. His column used to appear here weekly and I've always admired his ability to cut through the BS with clear, pointed, progressive ideas. Good to see him back on Alternet, and I'll have to go check out the Lowdown now.

Between Mr. Hightower and Ms. Molly Ivins, there might be something right with Texas after all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why are they acting this way??? The dems that is??? That is an easy answer!
Posted by: Pepper on Dec 22, 2005 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They don't want to get shot or have a plane accident. Its probably that simple. I think they are afraid. Its dangerous out there. The agenda is a big one and the Satanists/globalists do not want any interference with their no holds barred mentality to it all and they intend to complete this during this administration, that is why they don't care that we know and see it.

It has actually scared me of all people, since I am not easily scared, but I see it and there is plenty of evidence that if you do stand as suggested above, there could be dire consequences for those who dare to move as recommended. I believe that needs to be taken into consideration. Try to go back and remember the various attacks against the Congress with first anthrax and then racine gas. It was a warning, granted, but a very powerful one. Don't forget wellstone either, or Carnahan. This is way more evil than we have ever seen in our life time and makes Hitler look like an amateur.

If we the people do not give them cover by showing up strong and angry as hell, I doubt these reps will be able to find the courage to do as suggested. I am sorry to say that.

They will have to believe that its better to be dead than live under tyranny. How many really feel that way. Not many I am afraid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr. Hightower you missed your point.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Dec 22, 2005 7:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congressional Democrats are mired in the same swamp of corporate money that has sucked up the Republican party, and Democrats have shown (with some notable and encouraging exceptions) that they cannot be trusted to vote for the people's interest over corporate power

The point is that neither party represents the majority. We have regressed back to the days before the Revolution, when the battle cry was "Taxation without representation is tyranny" We are living under that tyranny today. The way to fix this is not to wish for a better Democratic party but to work for a better system. A system that will force both parties to represent the people. Click on a new idea

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

full honesty is required
Posted by: daw13 on Dec 22, 2005 8:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To become a true party of the people. Democrats must come clean about their very muddied past. Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton contributed greatly to creation of a pathological U.S. foreign policy, a policy of incompetent imperialism. Clinton undermined supports for the poorest in society even as he professed his love for them. When we fail to acknowledge our blemishes, no one can take our proclamations of sincere commitment to The People seriously.

Howard Dean, far from my ideal Progressive, did genuinely try to open the portals to full illumination. For this reason alone he is my choice for top leadership of the Party.

Lets also keep in mind that what we face, as organizers, is a task of drastic remodeling, not the reconstruction of a glorious past. When the progressive business movement of the early 20th century outmaneuvered the extreme Left (and buried the extreme Right), the Democratic Party became their willing partners. This ended the possibility of creating the kind of U.S. capitalism Adam Smith envisioned: one including both a strong business class and a strong citizenry capable of keeping the "bosses" honest. William Greider brilliantly described what happened to this dream of duality in Who Will Tell the People.

Our challenge as Democrats today, those of us who admire Jim Hightower, as I certainly do, is to build (not rebuild) a party of the grassroots. We must begin by ruthlessly removing the DLC in its entirety from any position of control, and the apparatchiks who defend status quo at every level as well. Every young candidate for office needs to declare himself a revolutionary within the party.

What needs to be done is doable. It requires resolve and intelligence. And the utter rejection of denial.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: full honesty is required Posted by: Lincoln fan
» Daw re Carter Posted by: vespasian01
» RE: Daw re Carter Posted by: xs10shal
» RE: Daw re Carter Posted by: daw13
Here's my plan.
Posted by: tcx2 on Dec 22, 2005 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I refuse to pay taxes until this shit is fixed. Until these crooks, these Nazis, are out of office.

Here's one less taxpayer they are going to steal from. I didn't vote for these bastards, and I'm definately not going to watch any more of my money funneled to corporate interests, the GOP, or lobby groups.

So Mr. Cheney thinks the president doesn't have enough power? That his power has eroded since the disasters of Vietnam and Nixon. As if the presidential power didn't contribute TO the disasters.

Here's to civil disobedience. They want a war on the middle class? They want a war on truth? They want a war on America itself? So be it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here's my plan. Posted by: Pepper
» RE: Here's my plan. Posted by: Lincoln fan
» Oligarchy, or republic? Posted by: tcx2
» RE: Oligarchy, or republic? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Oligarchy, or republic? Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Oligarchy, or republic? Posted by: ravengrrrl
» RE: Oligarchy, or republic? Posted by: ravengrrrl
» RE: Oligarchy, or republic? Posted by: Lincoln fan
"The Bush that stole democracy" – and the Dmocrats that help him.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Dec 22, 2005 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The poll numbers cited are more anecdotal proof that Bush was not popular enough to have won election honestly in 2004; and in fact, he did not. Anyone who has taken any time to examine the voting debacles of Florida, Ohio, etc., can see that Bush stole the election by massive fraud. Therefore, the only way that Democrats can hope to beat this Fascist regime is to win by margins too large to fiddle with –– and they are not going to be able to do that by sipping cocktails in Washington while congratulating themselves on their little inconsequential snipes at the Neocon Machine. The timidity of the Democratic leadership makes me ashamed to be called a Democrat – but where else do I go?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dems are marginalized
Posted by: Llama11 on Dec 22, 2005 11:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was watching CSPAN (gasp!) a couple weeks back concerning HR 4297, the $56 billion dollar tax cut that the Republicans passed. 50% of this cut goes to those that make more than $1 million, 80% to those that make more than 200K, and 3% went to those that make less than 50k a year. The surprising part is that I learned this from Democratic Representatives, Kendrick Meek and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. They were in the House arguing against this cut and saying the things I would like to say concerning the cut and the Iraq War. It was encouraging to see this. Of course their statements never made it into any mainstream media, but what I saw was that essentially they were ignored. THe Republicans control the Senate and they don't give a damn about people like us. Some of the Dems are spineless, yes, but not all. Some are truly trying to create positive social change, it's just that they're working against a machine that is monstrous. And then there's us, we "enlightened", "aware" liberals (for lack of a better term). We have to mobilize on a massive scale and let those bastards know what we want. It would take a demonstration by nearly all of us "progressive" thinkers. But I guess I just don't see that happening.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dems are marginalized Posted by: Pepper
» RE: Dems are marginalized Posted by: Lincoln fan
Socialism NOW!
Posted by: redstarwraith on Dec 22, 2005 1:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To HELL with the democratic party. We need a Socialist party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Campaign Fund Reform
Posted by: ravengrrrl on Dec 22, 2005 1:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
#1 – I love Jim Hightower. He really does try to put the fun back into politics. I believe that is one of the greatest problems we face.

I don’t know the stats, but it sounds like, to be a politician these days, you must spend EVERY day campaigning for funds. These people know how much $$ they need to win their next race and have meticulously broken it down to a daily average. Any day spent not gathering funds is another day spent working doubly hard.
How can they not be corporate slaves under these circumstances? Let’s not lament this reality. We must change it. Campaign Funding Reform! I would hope this allows a greater diversity of participants.

The Dems will never speak for me. They are too diverse. Harry Reid, the D-NV minority leader is one of the hugest public-land peddlers there is. Its all in the name of “affordable housing for the poor in Las Vegas”. Yeah, well its sucking the fragile desert ecosystem dry. Harry Reid does not speak for me.

Green Party! They’ve been excluded from the political dialogue long enough. Its time for change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Campaign Fund Reform Posted by: Lincoln fan
Prior Service Marine..1965 thru 1969...Vietnam 66 thru 68
Posted by: bayway35 on Dec 22, 2005 2:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about Red China gentlemen ???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All I want for Christmas is the P.O.T.
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Dec 22, 2005 3:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
PLATFORM of the People Over Tyrants Party O/K/A The P.O.T. Party

Because of the current trends in National and Foreign Policy and the many and varied forms of tyranny our people are being exposed to,we have formed from the People, a Party, that is For the People. This is our
vision of how we get the Country back for the People,restore our Liberty,Freedom,and Peace,here and now.
NO MORE WARS.
This country has 'made' the enemies we now face through corrupt policy in the name of 'Profits'.
We would cease all weapons sales,development and deployment.
Close all bases on foriegn soils,begin TOTAL DISARMAMENT with pacts of Non- Aggression.
END ALL BLACK PROJECTS FUNDING. Disband the C.I.A., Homeland Security,and the DEA.
All monies would be 'redirected' to Free Education for ALL People, K- Grad School.
PROTECT THE EARTH
Restore the 'Roadless' Laws in perpituity.Ban clear cut forestry operations. End logging in the National Forests. 1,000 year moritorium on mining. Restore the Great Lakes and rivers.
Force Industry to be 'inert' environmentally, Force Auto Industry to make High Mileage Hybred cars and trucks.EXTREME CONTROLS on pesticides and fretilizers and emmissions.
Heavy reliance on Solar,Wind, Hydro Generation, Hemp and other Biomass fuels for charcoal.
STOP DRILLING IN THE ANWR. Force Oil Companies to RESTORE IMPACTED AREAS.
PUT THE MONEY BACK IN THE PEOPLE'S HANDS
Freeze all Transportation Fuels and Utility prices for ten years. Extendable if deemed so by the People.
END COMPOUND INTREST RATES on loans,mortgages and small business loans.
FORGIVE ALL DEBTS. End Property Tax on ALL VETERAN'S personal homes.
CUT DEFENSE 60%, fund FULL HEALTHCARE and ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
Non Deductable/Refundable 90% TAX The WEALTHIEST PEOPLE and BUSINESSES.
Make SOCIAL SECURITY an ALWAYS FUNDED Program
GIVE food stamps to all Low Imcome Families.
GETTING POWER TO THE PEOPLE
PARDON ALL VICTIMLESS,NON-VIOLENT OFFENDERS.
PARDON ALL POLITICAL PRISONERS
MAKE NATURAL DRUGS LEGAL, MAKE MANUFACTURED DRUGS PERSCRIPTIONABLE.
EXPAND THE BILL of RIGHTS PROTECTION TO INCLUDE MARANDA RIGHTS
END WARRANTLESS SEARCHES,DOMESTIC SPYING ON CITIZENS
GUARANTEE THAT PEOPLE CAN DO WITH THEIR BODIES WHATEVER THEY DEEM RIGHT
ALL UNIONS WOULD BE BACKED BY THE GOVT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Getting It Right
Posted by: NoPCZone on Dec 24, 2005 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Moore-when he said that millions are RINOs- Republicans In Name Only. The thrust of his comments along this line was that on the issues, the neoCons lose every time. However, when labels are applied, the democrats lose every time.

Howard Dean- when he said that Americans want someone from the 'Democratic Wing' of the Democratic Party. Before the beltway Dems organized a political 'hit' on Dean with the Sheeple at the Iowa Caucuses, Dean was on his way. Dean would have kicked GWBs a** in the Debates and 'W' would be in Crawford planning his Presidential Library.

Eliot Spitzer should not be running for Governor of NY-- he should be running for President. He's one Democrat that knows why he's there.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eliot_Spitzer

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wish list
Posted by: jbloggz on Dec 26, 2005 1:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a non American I wish that one day your country will be as welcomed as it was years ago. You need a revision of your political opposition to make it 'real' and not a clone of the party in power. My own personal wish list includes to attend the Blair farewell party when he leaves the UK parliement and to attend the funerals of other so called leaders (just to be sure that they're gone). I do not include the US in this as I'm sure that this will be well publicised. The USA is in danger not from outside but from within and only you can change it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Way to go, Jim!
Posted by: bmikkelsen on Dec 27, 2005 7:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You have hit every nail on the head. Nearly all of the issues you listed will never happen, regardless of popular support, as long as we are mired in the unholy, god-awful muck we call campaign financing. It is the issue around which all others revolve. I spent several years figuratively screaming, "Where in the hell are the Democrats?" "Why aren't they calling them on item after item of unmitigated bullshit?" It didn't take long to figure out that our beloved party is just as mired in the muck as the Republicans. Even when intentions are good, the Democratic party has bought into the idea that we have to play the game their way to play. The 'New Democrats" have done more insidious damage to our party than a hundred G.W.'s. We can't look for national leadership here. The only way we're going to reclaim the moral high ground is to do it at a grassroots level; to push clean elections at the state level until enough pressure mounts to make changes at the federal level. Only then will all the other things we need follow: a moral budget, non-moronic healthcare, support for education and the environment, and on and on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When. Will. Jim. Run. For. President?
Posted by: Renegade Solutions on Dec 28, 2005 6:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pa LEASE!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement