Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Guerrilla War Against Cheap Lettuce

By Ben Ehrenreich, The Believer. Posted December 16, 2005.


Paranoid and frightened, the anti-immigrant group that calls itself the Minutemen mourn the American dream, patrolling the Mexico-U.S. border in their SUVs.
121605_story
The Guerrilla War Against Cheap Lettuce

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Ben Ehrenreich

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

If you drive far enough south in Douglas, Arizona, you eventually hit the wall. You'll pass through tidy avenues lined with new ranch homes and the stately old brick houses built for mining officials back when Douglas was a company town, when there were jobs here besides those offered by the Border Patrol, Wal-Mart, and the prison up the road. But this is the Sonoran desert, despite the lawns, and minitornadoes of red dust keep whipping themselves up in the streets and just as quickly dissolving. Then the avenues give way to a long, straight unpaved road, then a drainage ditch, and then the wall.

Constructed of adjoining rectangles of corrugated steel built to serve as landing strips for American planes in Vietnam, the wall climbs at least ten feet high for miles to the east and west, a rust-colored scar on the surface of the desert. When it passes through a wash, the landing mats are replaced by tall rectangular steel girders filled with cement, spaced just widely enough that water can pass between them, but not human limbs. Through those spaces, you can see into Mexico--more red dirt and skinny ocotillos, a thirsty-looking cow, a makeshift grave of piled stones and plastic orange flowers, the same blue sky.

If you linger here for more than a moment, the lenses on the Border Patrol camera towers will spot you, or you'll trip a magnetic sensor or a seismic one, and one of the nearly 10,000 Border Patrol agents stationed along the 2,000-mile southern boundary will roll up behind you in a Jeep, lights flashing. If you are allowed to drive on, big-eared desert hares will leap in front of your tires, and more dust devils will rise and twirl to the right and to the left. Then the wall will block your view again until, without warning, about five miles east of town, it comes to an abrupt end, and nothing but a few sad strands of torn barbed wire remain to bisect the enormity of the desert.

It's hard not to laugh out loud: all this mad fuss over so much nothingness. What are we so afraid of?

How it all began

Jim Gilchrist's home is a good nine-hour drive from the barren stretch of Arizona desert about which he has become so insistently concerned. Despite this distance, Gilchrist has for months now been planning to erect a human fence along the imaginary line separating the United States from Mexico, to station volunteers armed with binoculars, radios, and often pistols at quarter-mile intervals in an effort to protect what they and Gilchrist understand to be America from all that it is not. Gilchrist is a retired CPA, and lives with his wife and two aging Chihuahuas in a modest yellow stucco town house behind the walls of a gated subdivision in Orange County, California. Nearly all of the surrounding streets have Spanish names (Calle Cortez is not far), and even the car washes have Mexican-tiled roofs.

It is late March, and the Minuteman Project won't begin for another week, but Gilchrist's phone is already ringing every few minutes with calls from ABC News or Congressman Tom Tancredo's office. One of the Chihuahuas dozes on the couch in a mauve-and-cream-themed living room cluttered with ceramic angels, artificial roses, and framed New Testament verses. (His wife, Gilchrist explains, is the religious one.) A small man with hooded gray-green eyes, a quick smile, and a nervous laugh, he strokes the dog beside him and talks about being wounded in Vietnam on a dirt road just south of Khe San.

"I think about that place every single day," he says. A bullet struck his rifle, sending fragments into his face, head, shoulder, elbow, and arm. "We had nineteen men in our company killed that day. Their bodies were just laying in the trail."

The thread of Gilchrist's ramblings is loose and somewhat frayed, and before long he moves on to the last time he was in Arizona, about twenty miles west of Douglas, patrolling the border road with Chris Simcox, then the editor of the Tombstone (Ariz.) Tumbleweed, and, with Gilchrist, the co-founder of the Minuteman Project. On the other side of the barbed-wire fence, they came across three coyotes, as the guides who smuggle migrants across the border are called. "One of the guys must've been only seventeen," Gilchrist says. "He needed braces; I remember that. They were friendly and everything, but they knew what we were there for. Our interpreter told them, 'We're not here to hurt you.'" The coyote answered, "Well, I got ninety-five people back there, and we're coming in tonight.'"

"He even told us," Gilchrist muses with a laugh. "It was funny. It was somehow silly. Here we are on the other side of the barbed wire, and we're giving them a gallon of water. We did everything but shake their hands. He said, 'We need agua.' So we gave them the gallon of water and they said thank you.

I said, "De nada." And the young one, he was about seventeen, he seemed to be so sincere."

Gilchrist shakes his head in amazement at it, this simple interaction, stripped briefly of any shielding rhetoric. He doesn't seem to know what to do with it, so he quickly returns to the comforts of rhetoric. Gilchrist's colleagues along the Arizona border will later repeat and repeat again the same arguments and many of the same phrases ("economic invasion," "a nation of laws"). The degree of rationality, nostalgia, and overt or implicit racism will fluctuate from Minuteman to Minuteman, but the basics will remain the same. By taking American jobs and bringing down wages, immigrants are destroying the American middle class. By taking advantage of government services, they are draining our wealth. They will bring us all down. They are criminals and terrorists. Most of this is demonstrably untrue, but it offers a tidy enough account to explain most of the dislocations brought about by the current state of global capitalism.

Then there's "the stack of marbles"--Gilchrist's semifunctional metaphor for what's replaced the old melting pot model, "where the cultures are banging against each other, each marble seeking dominance over the other marbles." Beginning sometime in the 1980s, Gilchrist says, he began to feel "something like a disorientation." The country no longer looked the same. He began writing to his congressional representatives to express his concerns about illegal immigration. His anxieties grew. When 9/11 came, Gilchrist was devastated. "That was the turning point." He started spending a lot of time on the internet and read as much as he could.

Gilchrist came across an article about Chris Simcox in American Legion magazine. Simcox, a former elementary school teacher, had lived in Los Angeles until the fall of 2001, when he landed in the Western theme-town of Tombstone, Arizona, with a bad case of the post-9/11 freakouts. After the attacks, he told the Los Angeles Times two years ago, "For a while, I wouldn't talk to anyone if they couldn't recite the Pledge of Allegiance." He lost custody of his teenaged son after his ex-wife objected to his signing the boy up for handgun training. He has since opted for a calmer, revised version of his narrative: He packed up and took what he now calls a "vacation" to Organ PipeCactus National Monument in southwest Arizona. Simcox says he encountered large groups of migrants at every turn, even "drug caravans coming in."

He tried to join the military, then the Border Patrol, but was told he was too old. He pitched stories to mainstream media outlets but found no takers. So he washed dishes for a while and acted in one of the local Old West shows as a bumbling gunslinger named Shame. He eventually found a job at the Tombstone Tumbleweed. Within six months he bought the paper and quickly transformed it into a mouthpiece for his anti-immigrant views. In October of 2002, Simcox issued "a public call to arms."

"Enough is enough!" the Tumbleweed shouted. "Citizen border patrol militia now forming!"

According to the Arizona Daily Star, two volunteers showed up to Simcox's first training session, and twice as many journalists. Simcox was undeterred and now boasts that the group he founded, Civil Homeland Defense, is responsible for turning over more than 4,000 undocumented immigrants to Border Patrol. (His critics claim that number is hypertrophically inflated.)

A few months after reading the American Legion article, Gilchrist heard Simcox interviewed on the radio. Intrigued, he checked out the Civil Homeland Defense website, then gave Simcox a call. He offered to travel to Arizona to lend a hand and to try to recruit some volunteers. He sent out a group email early last October and soon put up a website of his own, dubbing the effort the Minuteman Project.

Asked to fill in the blanks between his reaction to the 9/11 attacks and the evolution of the idea for the Minuteman Project, Gilchrist leaps to his feet and races through a door in the kitchen into the garage. One wall is covered with framed black-and-white photographs of young men in military fatigues. "He's my lieutenant," he says, pointing to one photo, the pace and pitch of his voice rising with each word. "He was killed. These two were killed. He's still missing in action. He died. He was shot in the back by a sniper. He's dead. These are all friends of mine. This is me 36 years ago." Gilchrist hustles upstairs to his office. "9/11 comes along and I'm back there," he says, meaning Vietnam. "I'm sort of back there all the time, but really back there."

Displayed on the walls are a framed image of a man weeping, leaning against the Vietnam Memorial in Washington, a drawing of Ronald Reagan in a cowboy hat, and a photo of a young Jim Gilchrist in Marine dress uniform. For days after 9/11, Gilchrist says, he couldn't sleep. "I could hardly even walk," Gilchrist says. "I remember walking up and down the stairs real fast, up and down, up and down, telling my wife, 'We're going to go to war, we're going to go to war, these kids are all going to get killed, our nephew Russell, he's gonna get drafted, we're going to war!'" And that's it: that's as rational an explanation as it is possible to draw from Jim Gilchrist on the source of his obsession with the border. He talks more, for hours more, spinning off the usual lines about the burden undocumented immigrants put on the hospitals and how even traffic is worse, but the only answer he supplies that makes even the briefest solid sense is that confession of flashback psychosis, raw panic, insomniac fear.

Rallying the Minutemen

By 9 a.m. on April 1, two news trucks are already idling in the dirt parking lot beside the old Masonic lodge in Tombstone. Three more are parked across the street. It was here, in Schieffelin Hall, 122 years ago almost to the day, that the residents of Tombstone gathered to gripe about the military's failure to protect white settlers from Apache raiders. A posse of "Tombstone Rangers" set out on horseback and, failing to find any hostiles, fired blindly at members of a pacified tribe, then hightailed it back to Tombstone. Fortunately for all, every bullet missed.

The settlers' fears have hardly abated though the Apaches are long gone. At this hour not many cowboys can be seen either, even in Tombstone, where at any given moment a good percentage of the local population is dressed as Doc Holliday or Calamity Jane. Twenty Minutemen are scattered about the lot, talking to the cameras about the need to seal the border before the Mexicans steal every last job. Most are potbellied, mustached men on the far side of middle age wearing camouflage baseball caps and holstered sidearms. The guns, a nasty local history of vigilante violence, and the fact that the Aryan Nation website listed the Minuteman Project as a featured "White Pride Event," have been enough to get a lot of people worried that someone, be it Minuteman or migrant, might get hurt, and the anxiety has seeped into the newspapers and television news shows. But there are so few Minutemen around this morning that the reporters, who for the moment outnumber them about four to one, are beginning to grumble that the whole thing may be an elaborate April Fool's gag designed to demonstrate the gullibility of the press.

Sue Voss, a small permed woman in a denim shirt, struggles to light a cigarette in the wind. She's a retired phone company technician from Tucson and is here, she says, because she's afraid of who and what might slip across the border when the government's not watching. She had long been concerned about illegal immigration, but "September 11 was the kicker."

She got involved with the effort to pass Proposition 200, the so-called "Protect Arizona Now" initiative, a steroidally enhanced knockoff of California's Proposition 187 that not only denies most government services to noncitizens but requires state employees to report undocumented immigrants. It was approved last fall by 56 percent of Arizona voters. Like many of her colleagues, Voss does not think that the connection between fears of terrorist attacks and the desire to cut off benefits to immigrants requires any special explanation.

Late last year, Voss heard about Simcox and Gilchrist's call for all patriots to descend on southern Arizona throughout the month of April to "surprise ILLEGAL immigrants on trails heading north" and "suggest" that they "sit and wait for USBP... to come and pick them up." Voss first volunteered a few months ago and has been coming down to Tombstone to help out with preparations ever since. "I am terribly proud to be part of this movement," she says with a shy, earnest smile. "I think you're seeing true America here."

Several dozen reporters mill about, sticking microphones at a few white men with guns on the edge of a dusty parking lot packed with SUVs. Of course she's right.

Tombstone was never much of a town. It sits in a particularly drab patch of desert on top of a history no more colorful or violent than that of most other Western towns. There were silver mines at one point, but since the late 1920s Tombstone has been skating by on a mythic version of Western history, a tourist-friendly monument to a past that never was. Allen Street, the main drag, is a full-scale clapboard-and-stucco model of every eight-year-old's Wyatt Earp fantasy, complete with costumed gun-toting baddies and "authentic Indian collectibles." Genuine buzzards circle overhead.

By early afternoon, the Minutemen have locked themselves inside Schieffelin Hall. A small group of protesters keeps the reporters company outside. They wave hand-lettered signs that read "You're the immigrant" and "Who's illegal, Pilgrim?" Black-hatted Arizona Rangers guard the doors.

Inside, about a hundred Minutemen sit stiffly on wooden benches. Most are male, and almost all are white. Jim Gilchrist is standing at the front of the hall, squeezed into a tight tan suit that makes his head look like an accident visited upon his shoulders. Simcox is a few feet away, pacing the aisle with a video camera. Forty-four, goateed, and handsome in an aw-shucks sort of way, he purses his lips and squints with a studied Lee Marvin intensity.

Gilchrist blushes as the Minutemen applaud, then introduces the first speaker: Bay Buchanan, Pat's sister. She addresses President Bush, who is not here. "You have failed us. You have failed our children. You are allowing criminals to come across this border, terrorists, drugs. Mr. President, you have failed America."

The Minutemen whistle and stamp their feet. Tom Tancredo is next, the congressman from Colorado who is apparently hoping a political career built on immigrant-bashing will land him in the White House. (He's been visiting Iowa and New Hampshire lately, and will soon splash his way into the news by declaring that in the event of any major terrorist attack on American soil, the U.S. should bomb Mecca.) Tancredo is a tan, smooth-voiced man with neatly trimmed gray hair. He tells the Minutemen they are "American heroes" and reassures them that, despite appearances to the contrary, "You are not a small group. There are literally hundreds of millions of Americans who feel as we feel."

If Tancredo is overstating the case, he's not entirely off. This may be a media stunt, but there's something very real behind it, one of the periodic tides of nativism that washes over American politics whenever the economy sinks, bolstered this time by a huge and unhealthy dose of al Qaeda nuke-in-a-backpack hysterics. Copycat versions of Arizona's Proposition 200 are in the works in at least twelve other states, some as far from the border as Washington and Virginia. In the first three months of 2005, the white supremacist National Alliance went on a pamphleting spree, leaving racist and anti-immigrant literature on lawns and doorsteps in fourteen states from California to New Jersey. In late March, they hit Douglas, Sierra Vista, and Tombstone, warning that "Non-whites are turning America into a Third World slum." Last year, Samuel P. Huntington, riffing off such dodgy old tropes as the Jewish Question and the Negro Problem, published an essay titled "The Hispanic Challenge" (which became a section of his book Who Are We?: The Challenge to America's National Identity), expressing a racially insular white nationalism with astounding candor. ("There is no Americano dream," he concluded. "There is only the American dream created by an Anglo-Protestant society.") Still more worryingly, he was taken seriously.

So the sound of stamping feet that accompanies Tancredo's ovation is more than a little chilling. The effect is only magnified by Chris Simcox's closing remarks. He speaks in a surprisingly gentle voice, stressing the importance of the "S.O.P.," the ten-point Standard Operating Procedure he has drafted, which goes over everything from staying sober while on duty (point two) to picking up your trash (point nine). "We are going to be held accountable to the letter of the law in every way imaginable," Simcox says. "You must show the greatest restraint."

Before sending his men off to take up their posts along the border and protect the homeland from everything outside it, Simcox ends on an ominous note. He narrows his eyes and speaks very slowly. "The government cannot allow this to succeed," he says. "The agent provocateur is out there. Maybe even in this room." The Minutemen stand. They clap and hoot and stamp some more.

Our xenophobic nation

"In the West there was a panic when the migrants multiplied on the highways," John Steinbeck wrote in 1939. "Men who had never been hungry saw the eyes of the hungry. Men who had never wanted anything very much saw the flare of want in the eyes of the migrants. And the men of the towns and of the soft suburban country gathered to defend themselves; and they reassured themselves that they were good and the invaders bad, as a man must do before he fights." Of course The Grapes of Wrath was about migrants from Oklahoma, not from Michoacán and San Salvador. Long before the Okies left the Dustbowl, fear of outsiders had a well-established pedigree. But there is nothing timeless in the most recent outbreak of xenophobia. This current rash belongs to us alone, to this unsteady moment of empire in crisis and slippery transnational economics.

Until 1875, no federal law existed restricting immigration to the United States. A law drafted that year kept out felons and Chinese women, and another in 1882 excluded the men. It was only at that point that America began to notice its southern boundary, and then only out of fear that the Chinese might sneak in through Mexico. The Border Patrol wasn't founded until 1924, and before 1929 it wasn't even a crime to circumvent border authorities and slip into the U.S.: the concept of the "illegal" immigrant did not exist.

While the rhetoric of nativism has hardly shifted a comma in a century and a half--the Irish, the Chinese, the Italians, the Mexicans, they're taking all the jobs, they're criminals and drug-runners, they're corrupting our culture--its current manifestation, with its obsessive focus on the southern border, didn't begin to take form until the mid-1970s and early 1980s, when downturns in the Mexican economy and wars in Central America sent a new wave of migrants north. Xenophobia has been rolling ever since, fading in prosperous years, blooming in bad times.

Thus the recession of the early '90s brought us Buchanan for President, Pete Wilson, and Proposition 187. In 1993, in what came to be known as Operation Hold the Line, Silvestre Reyes, then the Border Patrol chief in El Paso, began concentrating agents in the urban center of his jurisdiction and thereby dramatically reduced the number of crossings between El Paso and Ciudad Juarez. (Reyes retired from the Border Patrol soon after to run for Congress. He won.) The next year, the Clinton administration launched Operation Gatekeeper, which poured resources into securing the border in urban sections of San Diego County. Feeling the pinch on both sides, migrants have increasingly been forced to cross through more isolated and inhospitable areas. Most cross through the Arizona desert. In 2004 the Border Patrol arrested nearly half a million immigrants crossing the 261-mile border of its Tucson sector--more than in all the other border states, both north and south, combined. In 1995 not a single migrant was found dead by Border Patrol in Arizona. Since then, more than 3,600 people have died crossing into the United States from Mexico.

No system functions without a certain degree of inefficiency, a calculable quantity of waste. That holds true for the massive global circulatory system of migratory desperation that sends Pakistanis to Dubai, Ethiopians to Rome, Burmese to Bangkok, Turks to Berlin, and Mexicans and Central Americans to garment factories in Los Angeles, poultry plants in Tennessee, tomato fields in Florida, restaurant kitchens, construction sites, suburban lawns, and cribsides from Seattle to the Carolinas. And it is one of the strange ironies of our time that, as Jennifer Allen, an immigrant-rights activist based in Tucson, puts it, "the borders are more open now than they ever have been. With the passage of NAFTA and other subsequent side agreements, capital goes back and forth, goods go back and forth, services go back and forth. The only way that the border is closed right now is for workers."

For the moment, at least, it suits no one in power to change that. American politicians can squeeze political capital from the latest crisis at the border, mouthing the rhetoric of homeland security and the war on drugs while making sure that corporate agriculture and industry have a reliable influx of cheap, easily replaceable laborers. (Last fall, the head of the Western Growers Association complained to Border Patrol that rigorous enforcement at a Yuma highway checkpoint was keeping lettuce pickers from the fields. The checkpoint was promptly closed.) The Mexican government gets a convenient escape valve to let off the political pressures that accompany so much poverty, not to mention the benefit of the remittances wired by migrant workers to their families at home, which in 2003 surpassed the revenue Mexico earned from oil.

Until about five years ago, there was no border wall in Douglas, just a tattered chain-link fence with holes big enough that trucks could (and sometimes did) drive through them. Today, Douglas often feels like an occupied city. In some parts of town and at some times of day, every third vehicle you pass on the road is a white and green Border Patrol Jeep, Humvee, pickup truck, or Ford SUV. They have a shiny new $28 million station just outside of town, and in recent years have been able to count on a steadily growing budget for personnel, fencing, helicopters, and a multitude of high-tech toys. Walls have gone up in the other border towns too, slicing neat steel lines through the perimeters of Naco and Nogales, and if Border Patrol has its way, they will carve a corrugated barrier along the entire length of the state.

'I thought I was acting in self-defense.'

The Minutemen's first trophy walked into their hands on the evening of March 31, hours before the project officially began, on the grounds of the Miracle Valley Bible College in Palominas, forty minutes southwest of Tombstone. It was there that many of the Minutemen were lodging, put up for a small fee by Miracle Valley's current proprietor, a Pentecostal minister named Melvin Harter. Built half a century ago by the evangelical preacher Asa Alonso Allen--who was said to be able to change the dollar bills in his pocket into twenties through the power of prayer alone--Miracle Valley briefly captured national headlines in 1982. An African-American holiness congregation had moved down from Chicago three years earlier and found the locals less than welcoming. Paranoia built on both sides, culminating in a shootout between parishioners and police that left two people dead and seven wounded.

Smoking a cigarette in the Bible College parking lot, bats diving through the night air above his head, Jim Gilchrist talks about the young Guatemalan migrant who, lost and alone in the desert at night, saw from afar the illuminated cross glowing on the roof of the Miracle Valley chapel. He hadn't eaten in three days and walked toward the cross in search of Christian charity. He found the Minutemen. They gave him a blanket, cupcakes, Snickers bars, and a quart of water. "He said 'thank you' in English as he got into the Border Patrol truck," Gilchrist says proudly.

Not everyone has been so lucky. One morning in January 2003, José Rodrigo Quiroz Acosta stepped onto a highway in Douglas and flagged down a pickup truck. He had been walking for days and was ready to surrender himself to the mercy of strangers. The truck happened to be driven by Roger Barnett, a Douglas rancher who owns the local propane and towing businesses. When Quiroz approached to ask for water, Barnett allegedly opened the tailgate of his truck, releasing two German shepherds. While the dogs were biting Quiroz, Barnett allegedly grabbed him by the hair and punched him repeatedly in the face and head. Eventually he called Border Patrol, and Quiroz was dragged off and deported.

The Cochise County Sheriff pressed no charges against Roger Barnett for assaulting José Quiroz. Nor has he been charged in the dozens of other cases in which Mexican nationals allege they were detained or abused by Barnett, who has become an iconic figure in the anti-immigration movement. Tom Tancredo, in front of Congress no less, has called Barnett a "homeland hero." Well before the arrival of the Minutemen, Barnett's reputation had made Cochise County (named for the defeated Apache chief) a magnet for extremist border activists.

In 2000, Jack Foote and Casey Nethercott, the gun-crazy leaders of the now largely defunct anti-immigrant group Ranch Rescue, launched "Operation Raven," their first paramilitary exercise in the county. It mostly involved dressing up in khaki fatigues and toting weapons on ranches around Douglas. Operations Owl, Hawk, and Thunderbird followed. (Participants received merit-badge-like "mission patches" as souvenirs.) Chris Simcox, of course, showed up in late 2001, and in 2002, onetime Proposition 187 spokesman Glenn Spencer emigrated from the San Fernando Valley to Cochise County, where he launched his own group, American Border Patrol. He lives just 1,100 feet from the border, surrounded by fences and ground sensors in a fully wired prefab home from which he maintains two websites and dispatches young men on ATVs into the mountains to broadcast live infrared video footage of border crossers over the internet.

None of Barnett's admirers work together or even get along, but they walk the same ideological trails and are joined by a tendency to get in trouble with firearms. Foote was arrested last year on weapons charges, and Nethercott served five months in federal prison after a standoff with FBI agents in the parking lot of a Douglas Safeway in which one of his comrades was killed. He is now serving a five-year sentence in a Texas jail on a separate charge. Simcox is on probation for concealing a loaded pistol on national parkland. And Spencer was on probation for most of last year--he pleaded guilty last January to endangerment charges after firing a rifle into his neighbor's garage. He received a year's probation. He had heard noises coming from his backyard, he told the Sierra Vista Herald at the time. In an unusual moment of contrition that could one day serve as an epitaph for the entire nativist movement, Spencer summed up the situation: "I thought I was acting in self-defense."

Angry white men on the front lines

"Forget about WMDs," says Rick Biesada, nodding knowingly at the sagging barbed wire strung a few yards away. "It's nothing for one of these guys with a communicable disease to come across the border." Mexicans, confides Biesada, are bringing "all types of social diseases," from chlamydia to syphilis. "But the frightening thing is the leprosy."

Today is April 3, the first official day of the Minutemen's border watch. A Vietnam vet with a tough Chicago accent and Semper Fi tattooed on his tricep, Biesada shares a lookout post with the brothers Thatcher, Richard, and Robert, tall and short. The three men stand listlessly in the dirt. Robert's thirteen-year-old-son sits beside them, glum and sheepish in a low folding chair. The Thatchers silently scan the horizon to the south. They are among the 857 registered Minutemen that Simcox and Gilchrist will claim actually showed up to volunteer. That number may even be accurate, though there never appear to be more than about 150 present at any one time.

They will not, as originally planned, "surprise illegals" and make them wait for Border Patrol. Apparently realizing that such tactics could constitute unlawful imprisonment, Simcox and Gilchrist chose to implement a strict "no confrontation" policy: Minutemen are instructed to do nothing more than sit tight and call the Border Patrol if they spot any migrants.

There aren't many to spot. The Mexican government and human rights groups have been working for weeks to get the word out, telling would-be border crossers to avoid the twenty-three-mile stretch that the cazamigrantes (migrant hunters) plan to stake out. (In fact, between two locations--here along the border road near Naco, and the highway at the base of the Huachuca mountains south of Sierra Vista--they barely cover five miles.) And the Minutemen are hard to miss. They make no attempt to hide themselves. Flags wave from their antennae, and their pickup trucks shine like a line of mirrors in the sun.

Biesada owns a small trucking company and blames undocumented workers for wrecking the unions in Chicago for "diluting our sovereignty" and for being criminals. And lepers. The Thatchers are roofing contractors from Huntington Beach, California. The taller one says that immigrant labor has driven wages down, making it hard for contractors who only hire citizens to compete. The shorter Thatcher recalls southern California in the '60s. "You wouldn't believe how good it was when I was a kid," he says. "It was about the best place you could live."

Now, Thatcher says, anger rising in his voice, "They run out their tamale carts like they do in Tijuana. I call the police and they won't do nothing about it. It's embarrassing. It's just not right."

It gets worse. "My brother, one day he walked out, and what was going on? A Mexican guy was going to the bathroom right in the middle of his lawn!" Thatcher bends at the knees, squatting in illustration. His face goes red with outrage. "This is supposed to be our country!"

Biesada jumps in and goes on for a while about the "nanny state," unjust domestic violence laws, and how there's no real patriotism anymore. He goes on long enough that the Thatchers begin peeking through their binoculars again. I get ready to move on to the next outpost down the line, but before I can take a step away, Biesada blurts, "I banged Hillary in 1967!"

He gives me a copy of his memoir, a self-published paperback titled Angry White Male and the Horse He Rode In On. On the cover, a drunk-looking Biesada sits perched on a Harley. And there it is, on page 64: "She whispered something about being Hillary from Park Ridge, like it was supposed to mean something, but to me she was just another score."

He signs the title page: And Justice For All.

Hot on the trail of the narco-druglords

Standing alone beside his pickup truck on the shoulder of Highway 92, Jim points his binoculars into the dry foothills of the Coronado National Forest. "We're eyeballing a possible smuggler," he says. An affable general contractor with bright eyes and a squirrel-gray beard, Jim asks me not to print his full name because he fears reprisals, he says, from the Salvadoran street gang Mara Salvatrucha. He points to a pass in the hills to the west. "This is one of the hottest spots in the nation for feeding hard drugs into the United States of America."

More reliable sources than Jim report that mainly marijuana comes through here, but no matter. Early this morning, Jim saw a man park his truck down the road and hike up into the national forest carrying a large backpack. Hardly unusual behavior, but, Jim says, squinting tightly, "We suspect him of being a resupplier." Also this morning, "a lady with Arizona plates" stopped her car, Jim says, dropped a few McDonald's bags and water jugs on the shoulder, and drove off. "We took them into our camp and they were still warm, so hell, we went ahead and ate them and drank the water. How is that for an insult?"

Asked if he doesn't worry about migrants dying of thirst, Jim scoffs. "We don't care--these are narco-druglords! These are traffickers! They're killing people by the millions in the cities."

A car and a truck roll up and three grey-haired men get out, among them Joe McCutchen, a red-faced septuagenarian in a peach-colored golf shirt. Everyone shakes hands. Except for some trouble with the radios (they must have a scout up there with a jammer, Jim concludes), nothing's happened since the hamburger incident, so Jim regales the newcomers with theories about where the president was when he was supposed to be in the National Guard. (Flying drug runs in Central America, of course: "He was a pilot.") The gossip turns to neurotoxins, and Jim, who grew up in nearby Bisbee, tells the others how to identify the Mojave rattlesnake. "Remember, I was a Boy Scout in Cochise County," he says, and laughs, "I never lynched one illegal Mexican the whole time."

"Damn the bad luck!" cackles McCutchen and, as if foreseeing his words in print, glances at me coolly and mutters in a thick Arkansas drawl, "I'm really getting sick of hearing bigot, racist, all that."

A little research reveals, by the by, that Joe McCutchen is not just a brutish-minded freak. Despite an eccentric habit of writing anti-Semitic letters to his local newspapers, he is a semirespectable member of his community. He owns a small chain of pharmacies and heads a group called Protect Arkansas Now, which hopes to float a clone of Arizona's Proposition 200 for Arkansas voters soon. He very well may win.

Tilting at the wrong windmills

What Hunter Thompson once wrote of a completely different constituency of unpleasant men applies equally well to the Minutemen: "They are not all vicious drunks, and not all mental defectives either. Some are genuinely confused and frightened at what seems to be the End of the World as they know it. And this is sad, too..." Sad not only because they are scared and broken men, and painful to be around, but because their anger, anxiety and grief seem to be the flavors of the day, and trebly hard to bear for that. And sad because while they are delusional about many things and wrong about most--the majority of undocumented immigrants, it should be said, do pay taxes, and as a group put more money into the economy in taxes than they take out in services--they do have some things right.

The good union jobs for which the American working class fought for so many years are largely gone. The stable white-collar work world is no longer at all stable. And the responsibility lies with decades of decisions made by the Minutemen's heroes (Reagan) and antiheroes (Clinton, the current Bush) alike, and most of all with the corporate powers those men so loyally served. The Minutemen were sold a dream, a newsreel fantasy of a nation undivided and strong (need I say white?), in which work equals pride, class doesn't matter, and we can all sleep soundly knowing someone's got our back.

They cannot admit that they were conned. Somebody ran off with the goods. And the only people around to take the blame are the ones already on their knees picking lettuce, pruning hedges, scrubbing toilets and floors, many of whom were pushed to risk their lives crossing the border by the same global economic forces that brought the Minutemen down to guard that overburdened length of wire.

In the end, the vast majority of Simcox and Gilchrist's followers are spared the discomfort of confronting their fears, except from afar through the lenses of their binoculars. At the end of the month, the Minutemen claim that their calls to the Border Patrol resulted in the apprehension of 335 migrants. (They will later claim that their presence prevented the entrance of no fewer than 60,000 others.) They have not, as many people feared they would, shot anybody or even held anyone against their will. This record of nonconfrontation is spotted by only one brief encounter that was, in its giddy, tragicomic way, characteristic of the effort as a whole.

A gangly twenty-four-year-old Minuteman named Bryan Barton spotted a twenty-six-year-old migrant from Mexico named José Antonio Aboytes Sepúlveda wandering on the side of the highway. Aboytes had lost his sister and girlfriend in the desert, and had been walking alone for two days. As a friend videotaped the encounter, Barton fed Aboytes cereal, and gave him a $20 bill and a T-shirt reading "Bryan Barton caught me crossing the border and all I got was this lousy T-shirt." Then he turned him over to Border Patrol, who dropped him unceremoniously back across the line. Neither the Border Patrol nor the Mexican consulate were able to discover what had become of Aboyte's sister and girlfriend.

Lettuce is still cheap

The southernmost row of headstones is not two hundred yards from the border wall and barely a hundred from an awning under which a Border Patrol truck sits idling. Here, in the Douglas Cemetery, near the center of town, the wall is only slightly more intimidating than an ordinary fence: just high steel posts, tightly spaced and painted beige. If you look close, you can see weld scars where the fence has been cut away and repaired, and repaired again.

Even from this distance, you can see into the backyards of the homes on the other side, in Mexico, just a few feet from the wall. When the corpses of migrants found in Cochise County can be identified, as is usually the case, the coroner turns them over to the Mexican consul in Douglas, who arranges for their repatriation. If they cannot, and it cannot even be determined that they are citizens of Mexico, the coroner delivers the remains to the funeral home just across the way from the cemetery, and they are interred here. Small birds chase each other from grave to grave. Butterflies flit among bright artificial roses. If you walk through the cedar-lined alleys, past sturdy marble headstones and crosses of wrought iron and modest wood, at the northern edge of the graveyard, you will find a cluster of low stone slabs reading either "Unidentified Male" or "Unidentified Female." Fifteen have been buried in this red dirt since 2002. They are what is missing from this story and from the stories the Minutemen tell themselves.

Lettuce is cheap. Hotel rooms are clean. All over America, lawns are trim and magically green. Grown men lie shaking in their beds. Not everyone makes it.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Ben Ehrenreich lives in Los Angeles. His first novel, The Suitors, will be published next spring by Counterpoint Press.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It scares me that I understand these people.
Posted by: SteveO on Dec 16, 2005 3:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I actually feel sorry for the Minutemen. I understand their fear and feelings if impotence, but I think that if they got their wish (all illegals gone now) our economy would collapse.

The so called "war on inflation" has been a war on the American lifestyle. The American dream of the post WWII era was based on buying a home then getting pay raises that allowed you to improve your lifestyle over the next 5 to 10 years. The war on inflation has forced the value added jobs off shore and created a subculture where illegals do jobs that our teenagers used to do of rates our teens won't even look at.

I wish I knew how to fix the problem. But, like the war on drugs, I don't think declaring war on illegals will solve anything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It scares me that I understand these people. Posted by: theywillknowusbyourabsurdity
» Here's how to solve it. Posted by: kittynboi
» RE: easier said then done... Posted by: Unbowed
Hey -- even Latinos understand
Posted by: arseniamarie on Dec 16, 2005 5:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The WORLD is becoming xenophobic... Chinese, Japanese, Javanese hate Balinese - hell, look at the Irish complaining about the Brits???

People want what they had, not what they're getting.

I want to be surrounded with people who share my economic and social belief system.

That's not possible anymore. Now we have consequences.

If the lady next door has plate in her lower lip and lives in a mud hut with no running water or sewage treatment... I won't like it.

If there are 3 Mexican families living in a trailer down valley in Aspen... Aspenites don't like it.... but their kids don't even work at McDonalds for $15 an hour.....

that's the reality in Aspen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hey -- even Latinos understand Posted by: bonapartist
» Shut Down McDonalds Posted by: Happy
not completely invalid
Posted by: sykotropix on Dec 16, 2005 5:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though I truly believe that immigrants should have the right to come to our country and become a part of our society and enjoy the many benefits that come with being an American citizen, I think this article is rather overblown and insulting.

Sentences like "She got involved with the effort to pass Proposition 200... that not only denies most government services to noncitizens but requires state employees to report undocumented immigrants." seem so overblown. What exactly is so wrong with people who feel that because someone does not take the time and effort to go through the arduous process of becoming a *legal* citizen of our country they should not have the same access to government services as would a legal citizen? What is so wrong with wanting employers to report people who entered our country illegally?

Though I agree after 9/11, many fears were exaggerated and overblown, I don't think you can say trying to seal the border a little more effectively is wrong or a crime. Is it not true that there are millions of people entering our country that we can not keep track of? Is it not true that though the vast majority of people entering our country illegally do so to enrich their own lives and further themselves and their families that there is a small possibility that a person or people looking to damage our country could enter undocumented as well?

Bottom line is that entering the country illegally and undocumented is a *crime*. I would never expect to slip into another country without following the rules and regulations required by that country and expect to be welcomed with open arms. I think it's ridiculous that we should accept that all people are welcome here without following any of the laws that have been set, and that every other law-abiding legal citizen must follow.

This article is rather insulting. Though the writer does a very good job of making these men sound like paranoid psychos wanting to be cowboys on the border - I think they also have very valid concerns.

I am 100% liberal - and also fully in support of diversity and people of any other country having the ability to become a citizen of our great country. I agree that they do benefit our society in many ways - without immigrants and diversity America would not be what it is today. That being said, I certainly do *not* think they should have the right to do so without following the regulations set in place

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: not completely invalid Posted by: pancakes
» RE: not completely invalid Posted by: corylus
» RE: not completely invalid Posted by: ftorres
» montana freeman Posted by: montana freeman
Just Great! More publicity for these idiots...
Posted by: vomitgalore on Dec 16, 2005 5:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The single biggest thing these guys need to make their anti-immigrant, racists movement grow...is publicity. Positive, negative, it does not matter...publicity is publicity regardless. Thanks for being complicit Alternet in their campaign to spread the word..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I disagree
Posted by: the republic on Dec 16, 2005 5:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I welcome each legal immigrant to this country.

Immigration is a public policy issue. Congress has the ability to increase or decrease the numbers of immigrants allowed, based on the usual host of reasons - politics, economics, etc. I'll grant you it is an untidy process, but democracy always is. Moreover, on such a fundamental issue, I want officials that are directly elected by the citizens to make these decisions.

Turning a blind eye to illegal immigration is just a back door way for Congress to appease business interests that benefits from a docile workforce and cheap labor, and thwarting the public interests, who are paying the taxes for the medical, social and educational services the illegals use.

The author dismisses the costs too easily. I am living in a rural area that has some of the highest property taxes in the state. Our population was realtively stable for decades. With a sudden and massive influx of immigrants, many of them illegal, taxes have skyrocketed to pay for the services we provide.

I think the argument the illegals are doing jobs Americans won't do falls flat as well. It would be more correct to say Americans won't do those jobs for the rates employers want to pay.

Whatever happened to the free market so in vogue? When oil became scarce after Katrina, the 'market' moved prices up. Well, if labor is scarce in Aspen, why can't wages also go up? If Aspeners can afford to be that picky about jobs, they can afford for their Big Mac to cost a dollar or so more.

Right now, liberals are rightly calling the Administration to account for the illegal outing of a CIA agent. To be consistent, shouldn't we expect all citizens to abide by the law? That would rule illegal immigration out, right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I disagree Posted by: theywillknowusbyourabsurdity
» RE: I disagree Posted by: the republic
» RE: I disagree Posted by: Gma1
» RE: I disagree Posted by: theywillknowusbyourabsurdity
» RE: I disagree Posted by: Gma1
» RE: I disagree Posted by: crusty
myths
Posted by: skydog on Dec 16, 2005 6:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Granted the meme that illegals take only the jobs that our teenagers wouldn't take may have some truth to it, but seems to me largely myth.

Consider New Orleans. Bush suspends the Davis-Bacon act, and lo and behold, Halliburton shows up with immigrant workers in droves. I'm sorry, but these people are taking jobs away from New Orelans citizens who desparately need them. It's a no-win situation for the workers either, because they're not paid what they're worth.

In a very upscale community in New Jersey, I've seen immigrant workers line up on the street corner waiting for contractors to pull up in their pickup trucks and indicate how many men they could use that day. They jump in the truck bed and off they go to build some multi-million dollar house. I knew union construction workers who were looking for work and couldn't get any. This isn't xenophobic, it's fact.

If the government would enforce laws already on the books, then we could be certain that those immigrant workers were entitled to that job as much as anyone else. Their standard of living would be improved, and wage and benefit levels better protected for all workers.

But because the Democrats are walking on eggshells so as not to offend anyone (as if the displaced workers aren't more than merely offended) and the Republicans want to depress wages and benefits, neither political party will act. Instead, both parties in effect co-conspire to perpetuate this myth that illegals take only jobs no American would want. All this nonsense nets out to a mighty handy toehold for racist vigilantes, because that myth simply doesn't square with blue collar reality.

A person who does physical labor for a living is concerned that if their job isn't being exported, they'll import the worker instead. When the only politicians speaking candidly about stopping the flood are the xenophobes and closet racists, next time that person might just vote for them. To that worker, the more progressive politicans are just arguing over the details of an amnesty program, encouraging more to come.

This is madness. The Democrats need to get off their donkey and reassert themselves as the party of the AMERICAN worker, regardless of race, color, creed, sexual orientation, or national origin. Progressives need to think carefully about the consequences of shutting down candid discussion of the issue as racist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: myths Posted by: Gma1
» RE: myths Posted by: mysticpal
Could somebody please explain
Posted by: bonapartist on Dec 16, 2005 7:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, you have a group of vigilantes armed with military grade weapons and enforcing the law as they interpret it. This is a clear infraction of civil government's prerogatives and I was wondering what US officials, like law enforcement etc., are doing to stop them.

I know that any European government would be pulling every gun in legitimate government arsenal to disperse a group that is in essence an armed militia.

It is pretty simple really. If you are armed with military grade weapons in Europe you are belonging either to an army, police or a criminal organization.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poor stupid s.o.b.'s know they're getting screwed
Posted by: sausage on Dec 16, 2005 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These morons, and that's one of the nicer things you can say about them, know some one is screwing them, and screwing them badly, but their racism prevents them from seeing that the "screwers" are their heroes(Reagan Republicans, ultra-wealthy White men.)

There's no hope for these fools, so let's have a laugh at their expense. Minutemen Using Illegal Aliens To Help Patrol US-Mexico Border?
Citing an insufficient amount of manpower to faithfully monitor the vast amount of territory along the United States’ border with Mexico for the unsanctioned crossings of undocumented migrants, the anti-illegal immigration vigilante group known as ‘The Minutemen’ has begun enlisting the paid help of Latino workers, many of who are likely undocumented migrants themselves.

“Unfortunately the requirements of maintaining a vigilant watch over our country’s porous border with Mexico have exceeded what our volunteers can handle, so we’ve been forced to resort to supplementing our ranks with temporary workers recruited from local spots where individuals willing to work for what we can afford to pay congregate,” commented Arizona Minuteman spokesman Russ Mangrove, “That isn’t to say they are illegal aliens, however. We don’t know for certain because we don’t check. The important thing is that we stop more illegals from entering the country and taking our jobs.”
(snip)
Remarked UCLA Economics professor James Warnich, “Sure, it would make more sense for these vigilantes, if they were so concerned with preserving these fruit picking and Wal-Mart floor mopping jobs for Americans to perhaps organize and force those employers to maybe provide an attractive enough wage so that a non-migrant might actually want it in the first place instead of going after the immigrants themselves whose labor and tax contributions are indispensable to this country as it is, but I suppose that would be a lot less fun than going around playing army hero.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hiring illegals is not "really illegal."
Posted by: gar on Dec 16, 2005 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While this article is well written and does what the author set out to do - make a bunch of people with sincere political beliefs look like a bunch of aging, pathetic, potbellied psychos - it also does what many other articles on this subject do. It blurs and confuses the line between legal immigrants and illegal aliens.

I have nothing against people immigrating to this country legally. What I am against is maintaining a never ending supply of cheap labor for the industries, farms and corporations that exploit illegal aliens and use them as a tool to keep wages of all other American workers down.

The other night on Lou Dobbs, I heard someone from the farming community say something like, "I've got to have illegals. No one else will pick apples for minimum wage." Well, Duh! This is supposed to be a captilist society. If you can't get labor for the price you want to pay, you raise the price until someone takes the job. Then, of course, comes a painful decission; do you pass that cost on to the consumer or take it out of the profits? There is the rub.

What you don't do - if you are a law abiding citizen - is hire an illegal alien. That is illegal. And there is another rub. While I don't condemn the Minute Men nor their actions, they are doomed to failure as are all other efforts to stop people from coming into this country illegally.

Why? Because as long as they know they can get work, they'll find someway to get here, and as long as people who hire them know that hiring illegals is illegal, but it's not "really illegally" the illegals will always be able to get work. Comprende'?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, yes, but this is bad for the POOR.
Posted by: medstudgeek on Dec 16, 2005 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I realize most of us lefties don't want to sign on with a bunch of racist immigrant-baiters, we ought to consider the effects of supply and demand on the wages of unskilled workers.

Illegal immigrants provide a 'reserve army of the unemployed' that helps keep wages down and unionization difficult. I don't like Tancredo or his racist buddies either but decreasing immigration would create a scarcity of labor that would raise wages for unskilled laborers and make unionization easier.

We're liberals. We're supposed to care for the poor and the powerless. Refusing to consider cutting down on immigration because some bad people want to do it doesn't make any more sense than eating meat because Hitler was a vegetarian.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impossible Situation, Improbable Solutions
Posted by: Basenjis on Dec 16, 2005 10:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I haven't a clue as to how to solve the problems under discussion. However, may I suggest a concentrated effort at nipping such problems in the bud by actively promoting universal birth control--or is that too sensible?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are the minutemen when you really need them?
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 16, 2005 10:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You won't find them protesting in front of companies hiring illegals in the race to the bottom-line. Walmart doing it is probably only a small sample of just about every big and even some small businesses doing it.

P.S.: Sometime ago, I read an article here on Alternet about farmers in KY hiring illegals because of their smartness vs idiots who care to only talk about counting sports scores than counting sheep and horses. I'll dig it up and post it here. And of course, you don't see minutemen protesting there where it counts. Then again, maybe they should spend some time getting people seriously smart in math and comprehension instead of mired in frivolous sports scores like water-cooler zombies if they really want to help curb "illegal immigration".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Years ago the leaders of Mexico said they would get their land back and not fire a shot .
Posted by: threedfm on Dec 16, 2005 10:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well , their were right .
Why don't we do away with the border altogether and become one nation , American can pay for and provide jobs , health care , and education for the new citizens of the USA . This not only helps the employers , but President Fox . He has fewer people to provide for and the ones that work , will be sending money home and that helps Mexico's economy . They can use everything that has made our country great and we have built , fought and died for . Lets just give it all to them and then we won't have to worry about anyone wanting to come , because we'll all have the same economy as Mexico . Then maybe we can cross Canada's border and be their illegal's

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» montana freeman Posted by: montana freeman
The Price of Untreated PTSD
Posted by: trauma specialist on Dec 16, 2005 12:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a trauma treatment specialist and I have been cleaning up untreated trauma, and it's sad impact on people's lives, for over 20 years. Mr. Gilchrist is clearly presenting with untreated PTSD from Viet Nam. My heart aches for him that he is still sufferring from his time in that War. Mr. Simcox also clearly had a terribly anxiety reaction to 9/11, a reaction that might indicate earlier, untreated trauma. To contain their fear and anxiety they are focused on illegal immigrants to try to regulate down their nervous systems. I am concerned not only for them, but also for the the men and women returning from the current Iraq War and the reality that our federal government keeps cutting money for the treatment of PTSD for veterans. In forty years if our new war vets do not get treatment, they will be looking for their own ways to contain their unresolved anxiety. And the entire society pays, and pays and pays again.

Trauma Specialist

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sick of the dishonest articles on Alternet
Posted by: agarillo on Dec 16, 2005 1:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Illegal immigration has completely destroyed the tax base in states like California. Period, end of story. I'm sick of supporting counties like San Bernardion where 30% of the residents are on government aide of some kind. The poor of Mexico have completely overwhelmed our social services.

I broke my leg a year ago, and had to wait about 30 hours *WITH A BROKEN LEG* for treatment because the hospital was full of illegals. It was painful. I can't wait until one of you bleeding heart idiots who might write an article like this calls an ambulance -- and it doesn't come because some illegal with a cold is clogging the emergency room... I think then you'll understand the real cost of illegal immigration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The latest joke Posted by: ftorres
» RE: The latest joke Posted by: metahope
» RE: The latest joke Posted by: ftorres
» RE: The latest joke Posted by: metahope
US - Mexico breaking relations - perhaps a good thing after all!
Posted by: ftorres on Dec 16, 2005 2:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps it would be the best thing for Mexico if relations are broken with the USA. After all, this love-hate thing between the two border countries has been a one way street. Mexico furnishes the cheap labor and Americans get fat, rich and lazy. Mexico should now follow (and perhaps it will after the next Mexican presidential elections in which the leftist mayor in Mexico City is becoming more and more popular) Hugo Chavez's Venezuela, Brasil, Peru, Boliva, Chile Argentina and more Latin American nations that are sure to follow. What these nations have in common now is they don't listen to the the US of and are not being intimidated anymore. They have witnessed what a rag-tag army of Iraqi insurgents is doing in lieu of the sophisticated weaponary America has developed. In fact, many nations (even those fighting young Americans) feel sorry for America's young men and women whom are being used as cannon fodder for corporate greed and a ignorant, arrogant stupid right wing christian fundamentalist conservative society! Breaking relations with the US is perhaps the only way Mexico will eventually straightened out her labor and social problems, just like Venezuela is now doing. Mexico, like Venezuela, has one big trump card and that is to stop exporting it's oil to America. and sell it to China and to other Latin American countries which have been destablized by the US meddling repressive intervations. That would be a revolution that would change the entire Southern Hemisphere forever!

Latin America should become more like like America's neighbor to the North. Canada has currently abolished the Patriot Act from Canada and has threatened to ship it's natural gas to China if the US does not adhere to the NAFTA agreement.

These idiots in the Senate and in the House better find out that they are nearing completion of isolating the nation from the rest of the world.

It's a sad thing to say that recently China came out ahead of the United States in world's favorable opinions, especially in Latin America. Something must be wrong!

By the way, Congress better find out that Latin America follows what Mexico does on the international scene.

Alas! It seem that our nation has NO shortage of fat lazy beer guzzling minute men, career lazy welfare recipients, Politicians on the take, dysfunctional corporations and a mass media that no longer credible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» montana freeman Posted by: montana freeman
Is it about vigilantes or about how a nation without a border ain't a nation?
Posted by: Sojourner on Dec 16, 2005 9:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we cannot control our borders, we should stop kidding ourselves that we are a nation. Yes, the problem is much older and bigger than building a fence. But what does, duh, we shouldda not-a done what we did when we invaded Mexico, mean today, here and now? Maybe our ancestors should never have come down out of the trees, either.

Vigilanteism will continue to grow if our lawmakers do not resolve the issues of social chaos. We will not put up with gangs taking over our cities. We will arm ourselves and hunt them down, if we need to.

Where I live, in southern California, such peace as we have depends on the patience and capacity of people to suffer. It cannot last forever.

By far, the huge majority of illegals in our city are good hardworking people. But we cannot accommodate everybody who wants to immigrate illegally. Sorry. When the price gets too high, there will be a fight. We can see the outlines of it already.

The rhetoric in the original article above reminds me of the story that ends with "There has to be a pony in there somewhere." Phew. Over the top.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» montana freeman Posted by: montana freeman
who's paranoid?
Posted by: whatthe on Dec 17, 2005 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What does this character own that the illegals destroy crossing the border? What's this character have to say about those breaking the law? If the law's such an arbitrary thing he wouldn't mind someone putting a gun to his head...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Minutemen are going after companies that hire illegals
Posted by: metahope on Dec 18, 2005 1:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This site is an offshoot of the Minutemen. I heard it was developed by one of their members. www.wehirealiens.com

I am on the side of the Minutemen. If our government won't do what it best for our country and our economy people will have to do it themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» montana freeman Posted by: montana freeman
Illegal labor creating a slave class
Posted by: harpy on Dec 18, 2005 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For all the hand-wringing over the fact that this country was founded on welcoming immigrants, the problem is that when even the "President" claims we should give amnesty and won't secure our borders(but doesn't have a problem with spying on American citizens), we have literally hordes of illegals coming in. When they're given jobs at lower than a living wage, this takes jobs from Americans who would do the job. Then you have a government that with every tax cut for the super wealthy, cuts programs for the poor, rendering them to a sub class. Then it finally gets to the point that with no health care, no food assistance, less money for child support enforcement or assistance, the people that were making a semi-living wage are getting to the point that they have to work for slave wages, which is not enough to eat on, let alone pay rent and utilities, they then turn to crime because there is no other way to survive. Then the big corporations can just do what they want because everybody is in effect a slave with no options left. We have passed the saturation point and are breaking the back of America. The minutemen may be racist, but they're trying to do the job that George is too beholden to the big corporations to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No mention of....
Posted by: Asses of Evil on Dec 18, 2005 2:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the fact that while Gilchrist was set off by 9/11, none of those guys entered the country illegally. And again, this is all bought about by paranoia when there are so many bigger concerns. Good God help us all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rant & Rave......
Posted by: FedUp on Dec 18, 2005 3:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and pull your hair; there's nothing you can do about it - that's where your frustration is coming from.
The world is on the march, and your fat-cats in government are only going to give you lip-service.
They're isolated from all this by the perks and privileges they've bestowed on themselves while you were circling the wagons.
Since the terrorists that have killed and maimed, are slipping thru their fingers, at a huge cost of human lives, they're perfectly comfortable with you picking another target for your hate and frustration. Go get 'em Rambo! You da man!
If you want change, go after your municipal minions - the last link in the flunky chain of command, and make them accountable, and not with some lame "mea culpas" - vote them out of office. Stop voting the party line! Stop falling for slogans!
And for the future of the nation, Stop putting millionaires in public office!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

montana freeman
Posted by: montana freeman on Dec 19, 2005 4:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
thanks for all this stuff , i am plain without to much schooin but i can still understand the bullshit thats going on in this place and i give thanks for all of you that try to make thoes of us that misted the word a little more .thank you people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: montana freeman Posted by: ftorres
Keep Driving Past
Posted by: kalaloch on Dec 27, 2005 8:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I will readily acknowledge that the author is far better educated than myself; and no doubt keeps better social company; having lived in Sierra Vista, Tucson, and Phoenix, I have some disagreements with various of his statements (though I sincerely doubt they'll be read).
First off, I am one of those rare things people everywhere cringe about; a marginally educated ex-convict (for murder, no less) with a psychological disorder, and about four decades of study into various weapon systems, tactics and doctrine. That makes me scarrier than the run of the mill illegal alien to law enforcement types, and I am a citizen.
Having said that, I live way the heck near the tip of the Olympic Peninsula of Washington State. No lettuce is grown here. Not many logging jobs after the Spotted Owl "episode"; but there is Salal. It's an innocent little plant, and you'll find it in most of your flower arrangements. Illegal immigrants up here harvest it out of the forest; both with legal permits and otherwise; by the pick-up truck full. Now, most of these "undocumented workers" have minor children which, by law, my local school district must take in and educate. I still rent my home, so consequently part of my rent goes to property taxes; that pay for the schools, the hospital, and the funding through the Department of Social and Health Services. Now, I could handle all that; I've had some nasty turns in my life before and needed help to get back up.
What I could not abide was an individual who was in this country illegally from Guatemala invading my home, and upon his arrest my local law enforcement informing me that I shouldn't be surprised to see this individual in the neighborhood within the next few days.
From my personal perspective, as an ex-felon, I am expected to abide by additional restrictions to the law. I don't have a problem with that. I do have a problem in that others aren't required to follow the law, and are given a free pass. My child comes home from kindergarten with a flag of Mexico, not Poland, or Japan, or Kosovo, not even one of the United States.
While I understand the author was doing his level best to portray the Minutemen as paranoid, heavily armed xenophobes, I would ask him to interview any of the number of American families who have lost a loved one to the actions of an illegal alien; an individual who should have been stopped at the border.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement