Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Arnold's Gray Zone

By Jan Frel, AlterNet. Posted December 19, 2005.


With his strange transformation into Gray Davis, Schwarzenegger is alienating his Republican base as well as the fickle voters of California.
121605_story2
Arnold's Gray Zone

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Jan Frel

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Two days after watching all of the initiatives he backed rejected by California voters in the special election November 8, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger announced he was placing the blame squarely on his own hulking shoulders.

"I take full responsibility for this special election. I take full responsibility for its failure. I take full responsibility for everything," Schwarzenegger said. He promised that while he would make amends with the Democrats in Sacramento and the labor groups he had pilloried for months, he wouldn't make any blood sacrifices within his own staff.

"I'm not that kind of a guy. I don't blame or point fingers at anybody. In fact, I want to do the opposite. I want to say thank-you to my team."

Two weeks later, Schwarzenegger thanked his chief of staff, Patricia Clarey, with a pink slip. Then he dipped into the pockets of the man he deposed in the recall election two years before, hiring former Gray Davis aide Susan Kennedy as Clarey's replacement. Schwarzenegger started speaking the politics of his predecessor as well, pushing for a state bond of at least $50 billion to spend on schools, roads and other public infrastructure. The bond "could be much, much bigger," he told the press.

More recently, Schwarzenegger replaced the arch-conservative California Supreme Court Judge Janice Rogers Brown -- over whom George Bush had fought with Democrats in the Senate for years to place on a circuit court -- with a moderate appellate judge, Carol Corrigan. Sacramento Democrats were cooing, and the media took these events and broadcast Schwarzenegger's conversion to "moderate" and "centrist" politics. It was morning in California.

Meanwhile, leaders and activists in his own party were hopping mad at the hiring of Kennedy, an openly gay former director of the California Democratic Party and California Abortion Rights Action League. Ed Laning, the California Republican Party's Vice-Chairman for the Inland Region, a heavily conservative area of Southern California, swore he would resign if Schwarzenegger didn't rescind the appointment, and soon after made good on his promise.

Mark Bucher, treasurer and spokesman for the powerful Orange County Republican Party said of the Kennedy appointment, "I am very concerned. It's not something I'd expect of Republican officeholders."

Bucher said there was a lot of dismay among party members and activists across Southern California. Asked whether he viewed the Kennedy appointment as more significant than Schwarzenegger's recent proposals to finance California infrastructure projects with bonds, Bucher replied, "People are policy."

Bucher and other Republicans interviewed for this article who had strongly backed Schwarzenegger's initiatives were disappointed that they didn't pass, but they didn't hold it against him for trying. What they took issue with was his hiring of Kennedy.

Mike Spence, president of the 10,000 activist member California Republican Assembly, which organizes voters and spends money on running very conservative candidates for open seats and against more moderate GOP incumbents, was equally dismayed about Schwarzenegger's pick.

"She's an operative," he said, "a pure Gray Davis Democrat, and that's what Schwarzenegger is quickly becoming himself. This stuff with the bonds is irresponsible -- just pulling out another credit card and charging on it." Asked whether it was Susan Kennedy's sexual orientation that so angered California conservatives, Spence said, "That's a small part of it. If it were that by itself, I don't think there would be so much anger. It's her political resume that's the problem."

Mike Spence, and two other directors of Republican organizations -- the Young Republican Federation of California, and the California Republican Lawyers -- co-authored an article against Schwarzenegger's bond proposals warning him not to "terminate his base": "Can you hear that? That rumbling is the sound of over five million registered Republicans growing increasingly concerned about the conduct of a Governor they helped elect." Later in the article they concluded, "This bond measure is yet another symptom of the illness that has beset the Governor. It will alienate the millions of California Republicans that make up his base. It is lunacy to imply that the Governor can simply cast aside the opinion of 35% of the electorate."

Faced with a backlash from his own party, Schwarzenegger delivered an unflinching and slopplily argued denial-of-clemency letter on Monday for Stanley Tookie Williams as a sop to his Republican base. While Schwarzenegger's decision reflected a wide majority of the California populace's opinion on the death penalty, the tone of the letter gave every indication of being a show of enthusiasm for his hard-right base; sincerely yours, desperate Gov. Schwarzenegger. The political undercurrents in the Williams execution were transparent; former Republican Governor Pete Wilson openly remarked that Schwarzenegger "reached a conclusion that is very supported."


Digg!

Jan Frel is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
what kind of inspired politics is Arnold after
Posted by: keffiya on Dec 19, 2005 1:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The point in this article is right. If arnold's big move is to be like Gray Davis, then he's done, because no one liked that.
If his big move is to behave like something between gray and a winger, he'll satisfy not one person. It's either got to be more fundamentallly against the way CA has been going, or appeal to the Democrats. And they voted against the kind of Democratic party stuff gray did.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ARNOLD IS SELF RIGHTEOUS HOLLYWOOD FAKE
Posted by: atomic on Dec 19, 2005 3:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arnold is a self righteous hollywood fake. He has made one stupid mistake after another. His decision not to grant clemency for Tookie Williams was beyond pathetic. Arnold is now ridiculed around the world. So much for his dreams of presidential glory. Maybe he can run for president of the block he lives on. What a giant deformed ego. Hopefully we are seeing the end of this ugly windbag in politics and in film. Get off the stage Arnold. You suck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Beware of Arnold's attempt to pull another Kansas
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 19, 2005 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's already starting it with the media elevating his so-called toughness on crime on issues such as the death penalty even when it's obvious that Arnold's true economic failures which he can only blame himself for can no longer be attributed to his opposition.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He doesn't care how he gets the power
Posted by: ScottP on Dec 19, 2005 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... as long as he gets it. That's why he ran Kevin Shelley out of the secretary of state position after Shelley challenged Diebold for their defective and insecure voting machines. As we speak, the California election system is being opened to greater electronic fraud. For Arnold, it is a race to November. Can he get enough audit-free machines installed in time to steal the election?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

California dreamin!
Posted by: ninzo on Dec 19, 2005 10:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
California voters must accept one of the following unpleasantries: cut services, borrow money, or raise taxes.

Instead they keep trying to replace the governor, hoping each time the new leader will discover a magic bullet to solve their insolvency problem, only it ain't gonna happen!

As much as I dislike his policies, his politics, and his demeanor Arnold isn't the problem here, the California electorate is the problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

munchkinpup
Posted by: munchkinpup on Dec 28, 2005 1:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please remember that Arnold found his way in the CA governors door because of the great CA "energy crisis"!! A majority of Californians blamed Gray Davis for this mammoth failure in CA's energy infrastructure, etc. I lived through it and remember it well. Does anyone want to talk about Enron??!
Arnold has made a colossal mistake by alienating labor groups in CA, something not discussed adequately in this article.
We pay plenty of HIGH taxes and some of the highest real estate prices in this country, by the way.
I had to laugh at the title of the "California Republican Lawyers" organization. I can think of a few other titles to give their greedy little group. Fortunately, the Repugs are outnumbered in CA and the voters will have their say. It's not only a new governor that we want!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]