Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Prejudice on Death Row

By Michael Kroll, Pacific News Service. Posted December 15, 2005.


If Tookie Williams had killed four black people, would he still be alive today?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Michael Kroll

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Because I conduct writing workshops every week in juvenile hall, and because I have far more experience with the death penalty than any civilized person should have, I was asked to come into the maximum control units of one Bay Area County juvenile hall on Tuesday morning, Dec. 13, to help diffuse the anticipated emotion generated by the execution just hours before of Stanley Tookie Williams.

For many -- especially the African-American young men who comprise the majority of the children locked away in this juvenile hall -- Mr. Williams was a kind of folk hero. Most had read one or more of the books he wrote on death row urging youths to abandon their gang affiliations and to recognize the humanity that each of us possesses. Almost all had heard the thoughtful interviews he did on various radio shows. A few had even spoken with him on the phone when a staff person had arranged a call from death row.

To prepare for my standup routine, I went through California's recent experiences with executions and came up with some startling statistics I thought these young men in particular would find relevant. Since the modern era of executions was inaugurated in California with the gassing of Robert Harris in 1992, the state has put to death 12 men. Mr. Williams' execution marks only the second time an African-American was the victim of the death chamber. (In addition, eight of the 12 were white; one was Asian; and one was Native American.)

My listeners were surprised to learn that the majority of those we Californians have put to death have been white. But they were astonished when I added this statistic: Among the 27 victims of these 12 condemned prisoners, not a single one was African-American! (Five were Asian; three were Latinos; and 19 were white.)

The shameful truth is that had Mr. Williams' four victims been black, the overwhelming likelihood is that he would still be alive today, one of the many anonymous convicted murderers who occupy our state prisons.

The fact that not a single person has been executed in this state for killing an African-American is consistent with studies across the country that show the death penalty is reserved primarily for those who kill white people. The California study, "The Impact of Legally Inappropriate Factors on Death Sentencing for California Homicides, 1990-'99," found that 80 percent of executions in California were for killers of whites, though non-Hispanic whites make up just 47 percent of all Californians, according to the 2000 U.S. Census. Those who kill whites are more than four times more likely to be sentenced to death than those who kill Latinos, and over three times more likely to be sentenced to death than those who kill African-Americans.

As African-American young men who have had to negotiate both systemic racism and the mean streets they live on, these young detainees were not surprised to learn that the system devalues blacks. But as the discussion veered from the execution this morning to Saddam Hussein to Hitler, one young man asked me about Jack the Ripper. I told him that those crimes were committed in England more than a century ago, and that the man who did it was never caught. And when I added that his victims were prostitutes, the young African-American said, "Oh well, who cares? They were just prostitutes."

This observation brought the discussion back to where we had begun. When I connected his belief about prostitutes with the first theme -- how the criminal justice system devalues some people by placing extra value on others -- he asked if I were accusing him of racism. I answered: "I am accusing you of ignorance, which is the prerequisite to racism. You have decided a class of people -- prostitutes -- are of less worth than you, just as the criminal justice system decides through its daily decisions that you are worth less than me."

In 1988 in Texas, Judge Jack Hampton sentenced a convicted murderer of two homosexuals to 30 years in prison, announcing as he did: "I put prostitutes and gays at about the same level, and I'd be hard put to give somebody life for killing a prostitute." The ultimate expression of his shocking admission is the fact that not one killer of a black person has been put to death in California in the modern era.

One lesson of war is that if we can objectify our enemies as worth less than us, then we can kill them. It could be prostitutes, as it was for the young man interested in Jack the Ripper; it could be gays as it was for that Texas judge. It could be Arabs or Jews or homeless or ... You fill in the blank. The sad truth is that as long as we classify groups of people under labels that strip them of their individual worth -- whether it's the Crips labeling their victims as "enemies," or the state labeling its victims as "gang bangers," etc., -- we can dispose of them.

Stanley Williams' execution just past midnight is merely the latest expression of our collective prejudices.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Michael Kroll works with incarcerated juveniles who write for The Beat Within. He is the founding director of the Death Penalty Information Center in Washington, D.C.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Victim Equality
Posted by: metahope on Dec 15, 2005 1:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the courts gave equal weight to the lives of the Black

victims of Black on Black homicide then won't the rate of

death penalty cases go way up? It means that more Black

prisoners will be put to death. Is that what the author of

this piece intends, that the death penalty is OK as long as

it is applied fairly on racial lines?

I say the Death Penalty is wrong because it is self evident

that the government is committing murder in our name.

Our government should never commit a crime even if the

majority demand it.

It is wrong because if you pay an executioner to put

someone to death you have solicited murder, whether it

is done by a hitman, or by the government. The Death

Penalty makes us all murderers.

The Death Penalty is wrong because sometimes people

get railroaded. It is wrong because sometimes innocent

people get convicted. It is wrong because if one innocent

man gets put to death we are not only murderers, we are

guilty of first degree murder, having knowingly planned

the death of an innocent man.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Victim Equality Posted by: fightnight
» RE: Victim Equality Posted by: geming
» RE: Victim Equality Posted by: Damien1247
Jury makeup?
Posted by: Samantha Vimes on Dec 15, 2005 3:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do prosecutors try harder to get minorities or otherwise change how they weigh the jury (younger people?) when the victim is a minority? Because it seems like there might be a question in how juries see things. The white/parent/older/conservative juror might be lenient because theya re judging the victim. But the minority/young/idealist/liberal juror might be inclined to be sympathetic tot he defendent not because they don't value the victim, but because they don't hate criminals and see them as redeemable rather than monstorous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jury makeup? Posted by: cyclone
» RE: Jury makeup? Posted by: EncinoM
gray haired liberal
Posted by: Duffy on Dec 15, 2005 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not surprised by the assertion of this article, though the use of stats is limited. To bolster the argument I'd like some mention of the amount of Afro-Americans murdered in Calif. and how that figure compares with total number of whites murdered. Then we will have a firm basis for the argument that Afro-Americans are de-valued when they are killed. thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well said, Duffy. Posted by: DFrost
you left something out
Posted by: mysticpal on Dec 15, 2005 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Three of Williams' four victims were Asians. At the time, he laughed and called them "Buddhaheads." (Oh right, he later said he was innocent.)

Would the writer be less dissatisfied if there were more angry white men out there killing non-whites, if only the predominantly white jurors would "fairly" convict them? I'm gay, and puzzled by all the comparisons of apples and oranges here. Also, California's peculiar racial politics do not always translate well in the rest of the country. In the non-death penalty states, we didn't seem to get what was supposed to be such a big deal about the Tookie case.

The death penalty is not a deterrent, and on rare occasion kills someone who is not guilty of the crime. This is enough reason to get rid of it. Let's avoid airy theories about the supposed racism of jurors when they are judging one individual, extrapolating that into an irrelevant indictment of the system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Our Latest Prejudices
Posted by: fatherton on Dec 15, 2005 6:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Stanley Williams' execution just past midnight is merely the latest expression of our collective prejudices."

Would this be our collective prejudices against bloody murderers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Our Latest Prejudices Posted by: bambic
» RE: Our Latest Prejudices Posted by: EncinoM
how many people did you kill?
Posted by: cold2touch on Dec 15, 2005 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets see: the current carnage in Iraq took over 100,000 lives, the previous decade of sanctions another million, 10 years of napalm, white phosphorus, Agent Orange in Vietnam probably in excess of 5 million, what about Nicaragua, Cambodia, Laos, Chile, globalization ... so in 40 years the US of A murdered upwards from 10 million innocents. Each time your elected representative votes to give psychopaths like Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld power to wage war, every time your representative does not stand up and publicly denounce past and ongoing atrocities, you participate in killing. It may be that an average American kills 0.73 persons somewhere on Earth. It is why we are 73% morally dead. It is why 73% of the world thinks America is a scourge that ought to be wiped off face of the Earth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

REST IN PEACE STAN TOOKIE
Posted by: 2rivers on Dec 15, 2005 7:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
no comment

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ST IN PEACE STAN TOOKIE Posted by: EncinoM
whoa, whoa, missing the point
Posted by: impel2 on Dec 15, 2005 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think most of you are missing the point of the article. The author said nothing about condoning the death penalty let alone making it the heart of the issue. When he used the phrase "we can kill them" and "we can dispose of them," he was speaking from the antagonist perspective of the American system, not himself, personally. Did you not catch that? He simply was highlighting prejudice within the system of executing convicts.

I believe that one group should not be valued over another and that is the point he makes. Whether you believe in the death penalty or not (I don't), we should be treated equally under the law.

And as for "collective prejudices," I have to concur wholeheartedly. Of course we have prejudices, and that requires a life-long unlearning process. I would be wary of anyone who claims they do not have prejudices.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» indeed Posted by: freya
» Collective prejudice Posted by: jgr4
dikaiosyne
Posted by: dikaiosyne on Dec 15, 2005 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tookie's victim's were human beings irregardless of whether they were black, white, asian, purple with polka dots.... He got exactly what he deserved under the law. As far as someone commenting on his books eschewing the "gangsta" lifestyle and being read by youngsters who could possibly end up in gangs. This is ridiculous. The most books he sold were a bit over 300 copies and one book sold only two. Hardly enough exposure to change the hearts and minds of many(or any) adolescents to stay away from gang activity. Just another ruse by the "We Love Tookie" crowd to deceive the public at large that Tookie Williams had "reformed" while in prison on death row. He never admitted his guilt nor showed any remorse for his murderous actions. He was a thug to the end. Good riddance and would the next murdering scumbag please step up to meet Mr. Needle?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lost on me
Posted by: robinka33 on Dec 15, 2005 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe this explains why we keep paying to keep a crazy bastard like Charles Manson alive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lost on me Posted by: cyclone