Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The 'Retreat and Defeat' Dems

By Stephen Pizzo, News for Real. Posted December 14, 2005.


Maybe we need a new party, since the party that claims to support us has given up any pretense at actual opposition to Bush's war or anything else.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
What if People Actually Treated Religion as Just a Metaphor (Like Trekkies and Secular Jews)?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
15 Signs American Society Is Coming Apart at the Seams
David DeGraw

DrugReporter:
When It’s Crunch Time at College, Students Turn to Adderall
Erik Hayden

Environment:
20 Weird, Crazy Ideas for Helping the Earth

Food:
The War on Soy: Why the 'Miracle Food' May Be a Health Risk and Environmental Nightmare
Tara Lohan

Health and Wellness:
Pharmaceutical Giant Paid $500,000 to Psychiatrist Who Used Chicago's Poor as Guinea Pigs
Christina Jewett and Sam Roe

Immigration:
Dobbs' Resignation Was Long Overdue
Janet Murguía

Media and Technology:
Is Right-Wing Media Hustler Trying to "Blackmail" Obama's Attorney General over ACORN Videos?
David Edwards, Muriel Kane

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
New Right-Wing Craze: Using Bible Quote to Pray That Obama’s 'Days Be Few'
Amanda Terkel

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Hey Guys, Don't Want Kids? A Vascetomy Is Probably the Way to Go
Anna Clark

Rights and Liberties:
Economic Crisis Is Getting Bloody -- Violent Deaths Are Now Following Evictions, Foreclosures and Job Losses
Nick Turse

Sex and Relationships:
How Abstinence-Only Programs Perpetuate Dangerous Stereotypes
Martha Kempner

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Army Sends Mom to Afghanistan, Infant to Protective Services
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Stephen Pizzo

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

For once the Republican attack machine has described the Democratic Party perfectly: retreat and defeat. It's what Democrats are all about now. I'm not talking about the Democrats' position (if they had one) on Bush's fool's errand of a war in Iraq. I'm talking about how Democrats have flatly refused to stand and fight the war here at home, the war for America's own democracy.

Democrats remind me of the that group of kids in every grammar school whose members were not smart enough to be dorks nor tough enough to be knuckle-dragging jocks. They are stuck in a social vacuum of sorts. Every now and then one of them gets some backbone and declares he's "gonna show those jocks." To which his frustrated friends eagerly egg him on. So he tosses an insult or rock at the school thugs, who of course immediately counter attack. His friends desert him leaving him screaming, "it was an accident, honest. I didn't mean it." After which the thugs would beat the crap out of him anyway.

Asked about recent comments where Dean trashed Republicans as "evil" and said House Majority Leader Tom DeLay belongs in jail, Biden told ABC's This Week: "He doesn't speak for me with that kind of rhetoric and I don't think he speaks for the majority of Democrats."
And...
Responding to Dean's initial remark, Edwards said Dean "is not the spokesman for the party."Dean is 'a voice. I don't agree with it,"
That's today's Democrats. John Murtha, one of the few truly tough guys in the party, stood up and said right out loud -- "get out of Iraq, now." I'm sure Murtha didn't wake up that morning and decide to hold a news conference. He almost certainly ran his idea by fellow party members. And, from what I hear, they replied, "Sure John, go ahead. We're right behind you."

When Murtha stepped forward, alone, and fired off that rock, Republicans did what Republicans do best, they attacked. Poor John turned to rally his troops, but they were long gone. Many were clustered for cover around CNN microphones, declaring as loudly as they could, "Murtha? He's not with me," and "Hardly know the guy," and "Sure, John's a brave American. No one questions that. But he doesn't speak for me or most other Democrats on this one."
Hillary Clinton said she respects Rep. Jack Murtha, D-Pa., the Vietnam veteran and hawkish ex-Marine who last week called for an immediate troop pullout. But she added: "I think that would cause more problems for us in America."
Oh you pack of quisling cowards. Run away! Run Away! Retreat and defeat.

This is why Dems never win anymore. And why Americans lose and lose and lose again. We lose jobs, we lose medical care, we lose sons and daughters. Because the when the other side starts shooting Democrats hoist the white flag of surrender and political cowardice. Instead of rallying around defensible positions and yelling "Bring em on! Pass the ammunition," they whimper, "Waffles, damn it! We need more waffles up here. They're killing us with our own words. Pass the friggin waffles!"

Their own party chairman, Howard Dean, is the latest Dem to be left bleeding in no-man's land by his own troops. Dean opened fire on the Bush administration last week, pointing out -- correctly -- that even though President Bush keeps using the term "Victory in Iraq," there can be no American victory in Iraq.

Dean's statement is demonstrably true and nothing Dems should run from. Any victory in Iraq will have to be an Iraqi victory. Because if we declare it an American victory that's just an open invitation to young Arabs worldwide to wage neverending Jihad in Iraq to prove us wrong. Just ask the Israelis how "victory" works in that part of the world. An American "victory" means, "Mission Never Accomplished."

Dean's statement was also correct based on the demographic reality Bush so carelessly refers to as "Iraq." When Bush says we are "bringing democracy to Iraq," he's flat wrong. What he is really trying to do is get three tribes, Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds, who hate one another's guts, to live together peacefully under one civil roof. Forget about it. It will never happen. Not in Bush's lifetime, not in his grand kids lifetimes. The best hope for everyone involved is the creation of three autonomous regions whose people agree that killing each other -- as much fun as it may be -- is simply bad for business.

Republican thugs also attacked Dean for saying that U.S. troops were "terrorizing Iraqi women and children in their own homes." Using the word "terror," was trespassing. "Terror," you see, is apparently now a branded policy trademark of the GOP. They own it and they decide what's terror and what's something else. Anyway, everyone knows that only swarthy people who blow things and themselves up terrorize, not American troops. But, wait, I've seen TV coverage showing American troops breaking into Iraqi homes in the dead of night and lining Iraqi women and their children against a wall. They sure as hell looked terrorized to me.

What Dean said was completely defensible by hard facts and video tape. (Why didn't the DNC immediately put one of those videos up on the their web site asking the question: "Do these Iraqi women and children look terrorized to you?" )

Dean was simply pointing out the obvious: that such raids, if necessary, should be carried out by Iraqi troops, not Americans. And that all we were doing scaring the hell out of Iraqi kids is sowing the seeds of anti-Americanism into a whole new generation of Iraqi kids.

So Dean bravely scrambled out of the trench and engaged the enemy at their most vulnerable places. Then he heard the thunder of his troops feet behind him. Dean turned to find himself alone. Not only did his troops run for cover but they fragged their chairman for good measure, just as they did Murtha earlier. Because those who stand and fight make the rest of them look like what they are, connivers and cowards.

What kind of party is this? What kind of men and women run from the fight they signed up to wage? When we voted for them they pledged to stand and fight for what's right, liberty and the American way. Instead they have done little but collaborate, triangulate and masturbate.

Murtha was right. The job of American soldiers in Iraq is done. They should leave.

And Dean was right. We can't win an American victory in Iraq. (It isn't even clear that an Iraqi victory is possible in Iraq.)

Any first-year college student could debate those positions convincingly. Data, facts, video tape, testimony supporting those positions is piled up all over Washington like cord wood. It's not exactly like we're asking Democrats to enter the battle unarmed.

Dean and Murtha have handed their party an opportunity to circled their wagons around a strong alternative to the administration's failed polices. The party could have -- and should have -- done just that, refined those positions into a coherent, clear and defensible policy, and gone to battle. Instead they tripped all over themselves in retreating into defeat, a refuge from which they can snipe at Republicans without exposing themselves to the political dangers of open combat.

Murtha and Dean are the Democratic Party's ideological bookends. Between them bracket the full scope of party ideology. Dean is liberal and Murtha conservative. Murtha is pro-military. Dean is anti-war. Between the two men's positions are all the ingredients needed to cook up a coherent and strong Democrat alternative to the GOP's "stay the course," policy in Iraq.

Look how easy it is:

  • Tell the Iraqis they have six months to get their political and military act together.
  • In six months all US combat troops will move to the Iraqi borders to provide better border security than we have in the US.
  • In six months the only US military assistance Iraqis can expect is close air support, supplies and free advice.
  • One year later all American troops leave Iraq.


Is that so complicated? But it means Democrats digging their heels in ... drawing a line in the political sand and daring the Republicans to cross it and engage them in open combat on the facts right out there where everyone can watch in public square.

But so far Democrats look even less keen for combat than the scared looking Iraqis we're trying to train. Like the "new Iraqi army" Democrats run for cover at the first hint of trouble. And, if one of their own does or says something that gets him whacked by Republican thugs, well, no one is gonna drag him to safety. After all, he was asking for it talking like that.

So it's more of the same. More retreat, more defeat.

Democrats do come out of their foxholes for the Sundays TV talk shows where they can take pot shots at the enemy from behind Tim Russert et al. So there they were this Sunday, blathering away about how wrong-headed Bush's Iraqi policies are. But when asked what Democrats would do, what their plan was, they ran behind the skirts of their minority status. Peaking out from behind those skirts they bravely declared, "Well, we're not in charge. It's not our responsibility to come up with solutions. Republicans are in charge, it's their responsibility."

Come on, Democrats. Would you folks agree on defensible positions and stand and fight? Stand and fight, damn it. Do you understand how important it is to this country that you do that and do it now?

You've already wasted five years, during which you've waffled, wavered, wimped, whined and withdrew from battle. And look what it's gotten us? The federal treasury is empty, the nation is treading in a rising sea of red ink, most of the world no longer believes a word that comes out of Washington -- and neither do a growing number of Americans. And, worse of all, once again in my lifetime American kids are dying thousands of miles from their homes for reasons that don't add up.

And you can't lay all this on George W., either. You Democrats wimped out on us and let it happen, all of it. Worse, many of you didn't just let it happen, you lent a hand - hands now permanently stained with blood. (Even Lady Macbeth regretfully accepted her complicity.)

So, what's it gonna take to get some backbone in you folks and get you out of your foxholes? If asked to describe the Democrat Party right now I think an alarming number of registered Dems would say it's become a nest of connivers and cowards. (You say it's not so. Fine, make my day. Try convincing me that's not true. I dare you. I double-dare you.)

Here's an idea. Begin by publicly admonishing the collaborators among you? Remember how mad you all got at Zell Miller when he spoke at the Republican convention? How about shelling out some of that righteous indignation now on Joe Liberman?

I don't know. I think I just waste my breath when I talk to Democrats like this. But I do believe that slapping around the collaborators, quislings and cowards in their own party would certainly change the "risk/benefit" equation. Suddenly wimping out in the midst of political hand-to-hand combat would no longer be entirely risk free. It would be a way of laying down a marker to party cowards, "Here's your choice, stand with us and risk a GOP bullet in the chest or run and risk a Democrat bullet in the back. Your choice."

But so far the only Democrat commandos with the stomach and backbone for a fight appear to be John Murtha, Howard Dean and Russ Fiengold. (Hillary Clinton's been too busy getting P.R. photos taken of her making nice to soldiers and wrapping herself in Old Glory to fight. And the Democrats' general in the Senate, Harry Reid, a man with all the charisma of a undertaker -- looks like he'd need one himself if he ever got too excited about anything. Smiling Joe Biden would stand and fight, but he's been away having his teeth whitened for the '08 campaign.)

So it's fools to the right of us, clowns to the left, and me, stuck in the middle with you.

Republicans won't change course because that would mean admitting they've just killed thousands of people for all the wrong reasons. And the Democrats refuse to put forth an unambiguous alternative because they are scared. That's right, scared. Imagine that. One of two parties responsible for running the most powerful nation on earth, scared. Afraid of honest, thoughtful, progressive positions and policies. Afraid to put them in black and white and then stand at the ramparts and fight for them.

Instead Democrats stick to what has become their new comfort zone, defeat. Retreat and defeat.

Maybe we need to start training a new political army. Nothing less important than our own democracy depends on it. Because I don't know about you, but I'm tired of losing.

I'm ready for a fight.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Stephen Pizzo is the author of numerous books, including "Inside Job: The Looting of America's Savings and Loans," which was nominated for a Pulitzer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
hell yes
Posted by: A. James on Dec 14, 2005 12:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
grassroots is where it's at. i know lots of people would like to reform the democrat party, actually get some kind of progressive policy making going on. but really, you've got the choice between the oligarchs (the republicans) and the politicians (the dems) with all the negative connotations you can tihnk of.
those folks have long since stopped working for us, so the only real option to my mind is for us to start working for ourselves. i'm quite a fan of the greens, and here in vancouver we've got the work less party. these are folks who really believe that citizens are political creatures by definition, and that at the very least the survival of our country depends on participation.
so yeah, let the dems do their duck and cover thing. hopefully, when they look up they'll realize that they don't have any jobs anymore and that there are real progressives in office trying to do the right things.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: hell yes Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: hell yes Posted by: A. James
What can be expected...
Posted by: adp3d on Dec 14, 2005 1:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...when these Democrats are taking money for the same donors as the Republicans? These are the liberal wing of the Republicrats. These are dinosaurs who are on the way to extinction. It is up to us grassrooters to change this party. We need to infiltrate from the bottom up, and this has begun to happen. Dr. Dean is leading the charge and it is up to us to get behind him and marginalize the Leibermans, Clintons(Hillary), and Bidens of this party. There are plenty of rising stars. Obama, Feingold, Pelosi, Edwards, and even Harry Reid are ones to hook into. The question is one of energizing the party. We seem to be suffering from post traumatic stress syndrome. We were slapped around by Gingrich and his bunch, and now we are feeling stomped by the current gang, who did not beat us by much of a margin at all. We have the opportunity to regain congress this next election unless we let those dinosaurs previously mentioned blow it for us.
And one more thing - John McCain will not be good for this country as president, he will just legitimize the current "conservative(if you call racking up the biggest deficit of all time conservative...)" policies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What can be expected... Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: What can be expected... Posted by: John Rice
» RE: What can be expected... Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: What can be expected... Posted by: william.slavick
Well....at least one thing was heartening in this article.........
Posted by: Pepper on Dec 14, 2005 2:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dean still has balls.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get In It!
Posted by: Sparks56 on Dec 14, 2005 2:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's a radio station in San Francisco, KFOG, that used to end its news broadcasts with, "If you don't like th news, go out and make some of your own!"
Every Congressman/woman is up for re-election very soon. The same for 1/3 of the Senate. Get involved in the campaigns and LET THEM KNOW, loudly, how you feel about things.
Posts on left/progressive web-sites are all well and good but it's preaching to the choir. The local grassroots is where the real power derives from. America is waking up from its deep sleep, not just about Iraq. Health care, global warming, declining real wages are on everyone's mind. Get out in your local community and raise some hell! You can best do this by getting involved in the local Congressional camppaigns.
Third parties are not the answer. Let the Bible-bangers do that. Get involved in the party we have and make it ours.
Progressive Democrat Chris Murphy for Congress! Connecticut 5th District

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Get In It! Posted by: Lincoln fan
Fear the Republicans?
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Dec 14, 2005 4:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Pizzo gives a true picture of the Democratic Party but I think he misunderstands the cause of their lack of leadership. It is not fear of the Republican Party but fear of losing the support of the same corporate elite that finances the campaigns of both parties and bribes our politicians through lobbyists. We are not represented by either party. We are in the same position as were are founding fathers when they shouted, "Taxation without representation is tyranny!". We will not have arepresentative government until we force both parties to represent us. The only differences between the parties should be in their methods to serve the people. Join The Lincoln Initiative, a grassroots movement with no dues, no contributions, no registration, and no hassle. Our agenda is "government of the people, for the people, and by the people". Click on we the people

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fear the Republicans? Posted by: jainist
» RE: Fear the Republicans? Posted by: Lincoln fan
Dose Dang Dems
Posted by: Tom Degan on Dec 14, 2005 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Trust me on this one: Every democrat who was dumb enough to give this half-witted fool in the Oval Ofiice the power to wage war without congressional approval doesn't deserve to be renominated let alone re-elected. That includes Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and Joe Leiberman.

Did I hear anyone say, "President Feingold"?

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dose Dang Dems Posted by: badkitty
» RE: Dose Dang Dems Posted by: Bushhater
» RE: Dose Dang Dems Posted by: Bushhater
» RE: Dose Dang Dems Posted by: billfaster
» RE: Dose Dang Dems Posted by: YogiBear
do what Canada did
Posted by: Don Garb on Dec 14, 2005 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today in Canada, the official opposition party is the Conservative Party of Canada. Three years ago this party didn't exist. It was formed by the merger of an old party, the Progressive Conservatives, and a new party, the Reform Party of Canada, which was only about 15 years old. The Reform Party was started by a passionate preacher from out west. In a few years after it's inception it had become the official opposition.

The Republicans are evil criminal scum and the Democrats are disgustingly pathetic cowards. The American voter is looking at a choice between a sociopathic bully and his completely dickless sidekick. I say it's time the US does what Canada did: start a new party. You could call it the "Not Completey Screwed Up Party" or NCFUP.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: do what Canada did Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: do what Canada did Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: do what Canada did Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: do what Canada did Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: do what Canada did Posted by: Lincoln fan
Eyes Wide Open
Posted by: jroush on Dec 14, 2005 6:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you want to know why the entrenched powers in the Democratic Party behave the way they do, all you need to do is look at the WaPo graphic from earlier this week illustrating where Abramoff placed his bets. Two-thirds of his bribes went to Republicans, and about one-third to Democrats. He larded the cupboards of both the Senate and Congressional Campaign Committees of both parties. Harry Reid is high on the list of recipients, along with Patrick Kennedy. Is there any way to believe that every single member of the US Congress is not steeped in this corruption? And Abramoff is only one lobbyist of thousands infesting our capitol.

This is not about policy - it's about raw power. Any citizen who does not get that deserves what he or she gets. And what you're going to get for the forseeable future is more war, more taxes, more crappy jobs, and an ever-widening gap between the rich and the rest of us.

Having taken a step out of the crowd of quislings, I'd like to see Howard Dean and Jack Murtha and Russ Feingold form the new party we need to provide leadership to the millions of Americans who understand what's happened. And the millions of us who see what has happened have to be willing to pay a new, voluntary Democracy Tax - a steady, regular tithe to our new party. We need to step up and pledge NOW, both time and money, whatever it takes. Write to any or all of these three men, and tell them what you're willing to do as a citizen and what you expect them to do. Remember, no pain, no gain citizens!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: yes Wide Open Posted by: Lincoln fan
The problem lies in boost or devaluing a Democrat's victory
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 14, 2005 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The centrist to rightwingers in the Democratic party consistently make it a high priority to go out on a limb and do centrist vs liberal labelling. If a Democrat wins, these people will hype "centrism" and make it look like that Democrat won because he or she was a "centrist". If the Democrat loses, he or she will be mislabelled as being somehow too liberal even when it's obvious that 9 out of 10 Democrats who lose often do so because they ran "centrist" campaigns. The trouble is these "centrist" Democrats who win by fluke imitate the rightwingers by also playing bait-and-switch with the voters. I'm just as pissed off with Democrats who exploit socially liberal backlash from voters in NYC, DC, Chicago, San Francisco, and other urban areas as I am with Republicans who exploit the social conservative backlash from voters in rural America. Would Rahm Emanuel and Joe LIEberman be in office today if they had to run their campaigns in rural areas? I don't think so unless of course they ran as Republicans but that's another issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blue in the face
Posted by: roygib on Dec 14, 2005 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been saying this for years. Pundits always act puzzled when working class folks vote 'against their interests" for Republicans, and can't seem to undersatnd this. The Dems have been owned by the wealthy for decades now and have been so cowed by the Republicans they are scared of their own shadows. They can promise all the health care plans and living wages schemes in the world but we know they will not fight for any of them. They are no longer the party of the working class and don't deserve our vote.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Blue in the face Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Blue in the face Posted by: Ellie1
Our options for saving this country are dwindling
Posted by: sausage on Dec 14, 2005 6:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The establishment of the Democratic Party, Hillary Clinton, the Joes, Biden and Liberman, DLC chair Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack and John Kerry, are as beholding to corporate donors as are crass and fawning Republicans. Clinton, Biden, Liberman and Kerry all represent states the economies of which rely heavily upon the financial industry and defense contractors. Hillary Cllinton serves the interests of Wall Street as much as she serves that of the people of New York. Lieberman protects the interests of his state's defense industry, this is why he fought so hard to save the Groton Submarine Base. Biden's Delaware has the most business friendly incorporation laws in the nation. And Massachusetts is the home to some of the nation's largest financial firms and defense contractors. Vilsack, as yet a minor player on the national stage, is firmly in the hip-pocket of Iowa's wealthiest real estate dealer.

As both establishment parties, Republican and Democrat, are essentially pro-business, they are only distinguishable in the degree of their hatred for the poor. Dempublicans or Republicrats, take your pick. Once you get past the issue of whether or not to give a couple of crumbs to the poor or not, thay are all on the same page.

The options left for progressives of all stripes are to either only support Democratic candidates who are as close to their positions as possible (no more blanket support of the Party) or form a new poltical party.

The last option is let things continue as they are, dissatisfaction mounting, and wait for the inevitable revolution sure to take place in the near future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

... what he said.
Posted by: gar on Dec 14, 2005 6:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pizzo, I don't care what the CIA thinks of you, in my mind you are a true American. When those guys were torturing me, I only named you as my contact once - maybe twice; it's hard to remember after the head injury.

Seriously, great article. I agree with everything you said - and then some.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ... what he said. Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: ... what he said. Posted by: jwg
» Pizzo reply Posted by: newsforreal.com
Canada shows it can be done
Posted by: apapmtz on Dec 14, 2005 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a hopeful idea from Canada! Could the USA create a coalition of perhaps Greens and Libertarians? What our eyes and ears tell us now is that the Republicans and Democrats are both acting only for the corporations.
A Green-Libertarian coalition demanded a recount of Bush's 2004 "win" here in New Mexico, especially in minority precincts. Democratic, Hispanic governor Richardson refused, in direct contravention of state law. I was there, could hardly believe my eyes and ears.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Are you kidding? Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: Are you kidding? Posted by: Lincoln fan
We Need the Labor Party
Posted by: japsey1817 on Dec 14, 2005 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's been a long time coming but the two front-running parties, the Republicans and Democrats [Republicrats] are parties of the rich and powerful economic forces. We need to build the Labor Party USA and take power from these capitalist parties, i.e. the Democrats and Republicans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We Need the Labor Party Posted by: malcolmartin
» RE: We Need the Labor Party Posted by: Lincoln fan
The Buffalo Party .com NOW OPEN Donkey & Elephant Party R Very Sick
Posted by: TheBuffaloPartycom on Dec 14, 2005 7:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
B the Change U Want 2 C

B One With The Buffalo Party .com Herd, If U Want 2

go de de Buffalo at...

http://www.TheBuffaloParty.com
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interjecting the Patriot Act
Posted by: aonghus36 on Dec 14, 2005 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry to interject this, but something has come up and wouldn't ya know, nobody is reporting the Patriot Act today at Alternet, at least not in the headlines...Murphy's Law, I guess.
Yahoo! News is reporting a clearly right-wing spin on renewing the Patriot Act, and how the House is ready, but the Senate is balking. It is the Democrats fault, of course. Russ Feingold is threatening a filibuster. I hope he succeeds. Check it out here;
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051214/ap_on_go_co/patriot_act

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paul Cardwell
Posted by: Paul Cardwell on Dec 14, 2005 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a new party, if you can call four decades "new". It is in 83 countries and the only problem is that the Republicrats use every method in the book, and a few outside the book, to keep Americans from being able to vote for it. It is called the Green Party US.

All Green Parties in the world must subscribe to: grassroots democracy, economic justice, environmental responsibility, and nonviolence. Individual national parties may add as many values to that as they wish. Those are obviously missing from both Republican and Democratic Parties values.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

norasue2001
Posted by: Nora on Dec 14, 2005 8:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is there any way we can print and drop a planeload of this right-on article onto the Capitol Building? We need to find all the gutless "representatives" and let them know their jobs are in jeopardy! In 2000 they blamed Ralph Nader for their own ineptness in blocking an idiot from becoming president. Who did they have to blame in 2004??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: norasue2001 Posted by: budd
Um, what about the Greens?
Posted by: dirkster42 on Dec 14, 2005 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder what the best way is to use the Green Party to advance a progressive agenda. I'm registered Green, but end up voting Democratic more often than not because I'm afraid of a Republican victory. I think it's important to have a real left party to keep the Dems on their toes, but I'm tired of handing power to the Republicans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ChrisM
Posted by: cmaukonen on Dec 14, 2005 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For crying out loud. The Dems have never been a "Peace" or
social justice party. They have always been the hawks and have
always been on the side of business. Reread your history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ChrisM Posted by: jwg
Guess which masters your elected officials serve?
Posted by: monkeywrench on Dec 14, 2005 9:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
C'mon, Mr. Pizzo; c'mon America: the fact is that both Democrats and Republicans ARE ALL ON THE TAKE!!!

Well, maybe...maybe...not all of them, but the vast majority certainly are, from the real governing body in this country: corporations. Nobody in power in Washington wants to risk losing their rich, bloated, aristocratic lifestyle, largely provided for by corporate largesse, by actually standing up for something that might anger their masters.

Why did we go into Iraq? Because it's good for business! Anti-terrorism requires a clandestine style of warfare: special ops, hit squads, financial disruption, psy-ops, etc. It does not require alot of guns and tanks and planes. What was the military-industrial complex to do? Start a war in Iraq that requires guns and tanks and planes! Without that, the M.I.C. would be out of work. Not to mention all that oil, privatized infrastructure, educated cheap labor (eventually), and agriculture (through genetically-engineered, patented seed stocks) just sitting there for the taking.

I believe that most of our "leaders" have sold out to the highest corporate bidders, and that the sniping by the Dems is just eye- and ear-wash to perpetuate the sham. Our system, in its new, bastardized form, is in big trouble. Maybe a third party could help – IF millions of pissed-off, vocal, politically-active people could be persuaded to join (good luck...). What would also help is if the people of this country could be made to realize just how badly they're being screwed by those they trust – and elect – to protect their interests. (Good luck with that as well.)

"The People" will never win out over corporations until they can lobby as effectively as corporations – and any money (and some of our freedom) that might be available to do that is being confiscated as we speak by the policies of the current administration. All the rest – what passes for Washington politics today – is just another rigged prime-time "reality" show.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Left out of exit plan: bases & OIL
Posted by: yurbud on Dec 14, 2005 9:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everything he said was true, but his exit plan left out two crucial elements that are at the heart of why Bush won't leave:

1. The United States renounce claim to any permanent military bases in Iraq, and will only negotiate for them once all of our troops are OUT, so the Iraqis aren't coerced.

2. The restructuring of Iraq's OIL industry, and replacing of Saddam's contracts with the French and American contractors is rescinded and the Iraqis are free to decide who will pump their oil and how to divide the profits.

Iraq can estimate the amount of unmetered oil that has been pumped during the occupation and the US will collect that income from the corporations that stole that oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A new drug....
Posted by: saretto on Dec 14, 2005 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think we need to re-vamp the system as is. If only 6% of our population, then I think we need to re-evaluate how we, as a people, educate ourselves about our own government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A new drug.... Posted by: deha
Here's a new Party
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Dec 14, 2005 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a people movement back to what America would be without influence peddlers,wealthy secret dealers and corrupted politicians in it only for the money they can get from their contributers.
What's the name? The People Over Tyrants Party. Or if you need a catchy title, the P.O.T. Party.
When true middle Class is about $200,000/yr,if you live in a major city,have three kids,two cars and a mortgage, more debt than you van carry,something's wrong. If you're one of the many that live on$50,000/yr, have 1 child,a p.o.s. car,
rent, and have to think about how much of the utilities you can pay and still by food,gas,and asswipe,live in a town of
>100,000,you're not middle class either. You're mid-level low-income. Something's wrong.
We are under the rule of tyranny. The tyranny of an out of touch Govt that's more willing to start a war for oil than take care of it's People. The tyranny of compound intrest rates that 'legally' steal the money out of your pockets by merely having an account. The tyranny of taxation on the people to make up for Ins. Company payouts to VICTIMS of 9/11,Katrina and Rita. Folks paid premiums to get that coverage,it's illegal to tax the people for an Ins. company doing it's responsibility. It's also illegal to be forced under the tyranny of paying tax for a sports arena,stadium,or a preforming Arts Center.
How about the tyranny of being told your utility bill will go up 20-35% and the reality is,it's up 100% from last year.
The People Over Tyrants Party may be fledgling,it may be the only internet Party,it may be the only party that owse it's alliance to the people,it may also be the only party that won't cost money to be in. But the name clearly,concisely,says it all.We are People Over Tyrants. Do you want your full Liberty back? Are you ready for Freedom on a major scale? Do you think the Wealthy get far too many breaks and should pay their share of the taxes? Do you think working in Peace is better than war? Do you want to see Social Security, Healthcare and environmental cleanup in off-budget always funded programs? Then join the party!What's it take to get in?
If you're fed up with the things I've just outlined, you're already a member. To get ahold of others in your area, start talking to your neighbors,friends and family. If there's 5 of you in your area,there's thousands in your state.
Throw a P.O.T. Party for Peace and Justice. Be Free!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here's a new Party Posted by: Doubtom
Were do we enlist for the Revolution?
Posted by: starvinmarvy on Dec 14, 2005 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Steve....great artical...right on the money....if only the major news media would run this artical! We need a way to unite!We need a way to come together...and CHANGE..the direction this country is heading. CHANGE IT! Change how politics are
played. Anyhow....when we figure how to do this...sign me up!
I`ll be the "flag bearer" and take the first bullet for our cause!! The true.....American People!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Uh, who exactly is "US"?
Posted by: Newtopia on Dec 14, 2005 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those corrupt bastards don't represent me...

Once again, we see a systemic failing of Progressives, who just cannot seem to break from identifying with the Democratic Party, who hasn't represented their interests in over 40 years.

How much LONGER will it take to WAKE UP?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

don't need opposition...
Posted by: tcx2 on Dec 14, 2005 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No need for opposition to watch the republican party implode. Who needs enemies when you have people like DeLay, Cheney, and Rove on your team? Just wait until all that "Group W" fake business defense contracting scheme is brought to light. The entire party will go down in flames, taking America with it no doubt.

It's actually better that the democrats shut their mouth right now. Better to NOT give the republicans a means of diverting attention from the republican crimes and treason going on. Let the republicans know that they bought this no-win Iraq war and they committed the crimes and they are all alone. Just as they will be when they are rotting in prison.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: don't need opposition... Posted by: picaresque
It sucks on the other side as well
Posted by: Patinator on Dec 14, 2005 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a mostly libertarian who votes republican for fiscal reasons, there are many on the right who are just as dissappointed. Bush has outspent Clinton as a "conservative". I will wait and see about real tax/social security reform, but I have my doubts.

The big problem is that we have two dominant parties that are basically the same. Instead of a contitutional republic with legitimate representation, we have corporatism where anyone who spends more than one term is owned by one or more special interest groups. I just wish they would be honest about it. It would great if they wore patches of their sponsors like those race car drivers.

Anyway, until alternative parties like Green, Constitional, Libertarian, Labor, etc. gain power, we will be stuck in this Hegalian Dialectic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Grassroots just won't cut it.
Posted by: vtmarik on Dec 14, 2005 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being a grassroots democrat has one major drawback: Grassroots or not, you're still a Democrat.

So, i propose a new party. Call it the People Party, and the slogan could be as American as everything else we've co-opted: We The People.

"We The People of the United States, in order to save the lives of our sons and daughters, hereby rise as one and challenge President Bush for the Presidency of the United States."

Advertising dollars can then stop being funneled to useless Dems in power and be used to represent what we *really* want instead of what those we elect want.

Too idealistic? Too good an idea to work? Probably. But no one can say that you ran away like they did.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There Is No Maybe About It!
Posted by: malcolmartin on Dec 14, 2005 11:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe? Are you kidding, we have no choice! The Republicans and Democrats are merging as capitalism consolidates its control over the whole system.

Stop deluding the American people that there will be any more real elections in this country. The mass media and electoral machinery and both major political parties are now fully under the control of those in power. Elections that matter are a quaint feature of America’s past. As long as George Bush remains a useful idiot of the ruling clique his approval rating could drop to zero and he will sleep in the White House. At the same time Bush is expendable in the blink of an eye if it suits his masters. He will be replaced by another fake everyman, a new actor, a man better able to read the script and parrot the talking points. The men in charge of this country will only release their grip on us when their hearts are stopped or they are confined to prisons by a powerful armed force capable of overcoming their hired killers.

We must enlist people and accept the leadership of people in a new insurgent political movement without regard to race or nationality. Unbeknownst to most oppressed white workers in this country, unity with his/her African-American, Hispanic and immigrant counterparts is the only hope of salvation. Racism and xenophobia and every other tactic of division have been the lifeblood of capitalism with good reason. Our unity is the only potentially deadly threat to this system. White supremacy, Black-nationalism, religious fundamentalism, sexism, homophobia, and all the crackpot schemes and nihilistic cults of the bourgeoisie, like al-Qaeda, are dead ends for all of us.

Those few living high off the hog in capitalist America long ago declared war on the rest of us. So far in that war we have been doing all the starving and the drowning and the dying. It's time to make it a fair fight and call out our true enemies. Rupert Murdoch and George Soros and Warren Buffet and Bill and Melinda Gates and the Walton family and all the other who appear on Fortune magazine’s annual list, the Sultan of Bahrain and the House of Saud, the oligarchs everywhere must face the consequences of their gluttony.

Our children are being murdered from Darfur to the Sunni Triangle to New Orleans today and many more will die tomorrow but don’t mourn. Organize!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There Is No Maybe About It! Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: There Is No Maybe About It! Posted by: drthomson
re "RETREAT FIRST!" Democrats.
Posted by: FFA on Dec 14, 2005 11:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bravo for Mr. Pizzo's article "RETREAT FIRST Democrats." I recently purchased a copy of Mr. Pizzo's book "Inside Job- The Looting of America's S&L" because I realized that Republicans are ONCE AGAIN DOING to America what they did in the '80s - get us chump taxpayers to HAND OVER BILLIONS to their cronies and donors.

Speaking of, "WHEW!" I just spent from 8am to 2:30 pm writing a compilation of Democrat's RETREAT ISSUES, and blew past the Alternet 2,500 word limit even on 4th and 5th edits! WHERE to start?

#1. the Sen. Patty Murray Amendment to SUPPORT THE TROOPS. This amendment $2.7 B to fund Veteran's rehab and medical for returning Iraq war vets - was SHOT DOWN on STRAIGHT PARTY LINE VOTE by Repugs. STUPID DEM 'leaders" are CLUELESS to make this a FIGHTING ISSUE. NOT making it a fighting issue GIVES the evil Repubs the "Moral Values" HIGH GROUND- they can portray Dems as being AGAINST THE TROOPS (for not supporting the war) even though THEY are the ***-****s who DON'T SUPPORT THE TROOPS! Dem. leadership should be FLOGGED for this INCOMPETENT, NEGLIGENT, DERELICTION IN DUTY apathy.

#2. Katrina/New Orleans. Every soldier, general, or even armchair warrior knows you can win the battle, and loose the war. We US taxpayers are spending BILLIONS on Katrina clean-up - WITH NO OVERALL PLAN to make NO safe and secure. As Sen. Landrieu (D-LA) said on radio yesterday, AMSTERDAM is below sea-level- the Dutch and Europeans haven't GIVEN UP on AMSTERDAM! Dems should be SPEAKING IN ONE VOICE: Demand a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION of FEMA's KATRINAL CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE, and demand a COMPREHENSIVE PLAN to restore Mississippi River wetlands and NO dykes.

A new article by Semour Hersh in the New Yorker says that Bush is becoming increasingly ISOLATED from staff and advisors, as he prays to be seen as the leader who delivered "democracy" to Iraq. (He is actually aiding the Shiite theocrats to crush the Sunnis whom his father supported for 20 years.) Democrats, TELL BUSH TO GET OUT OF HIS WH prayer-chapel, and GO LEAD THE REBUILDING OF NEW ORLEANS!

#3. Diebold- Disenfranchisement of American voters. Democrats SIT ON THEIR HANDS, as a class-action lawsuit alleges CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY by Diebold's (until yesterday) CEO, Wally O'Dell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

re "RETREAT FIRST!" Democrats.
Posted by: FFA on Dec 14, 2005 11:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bravo for Mr. Pizzo's article "RETREAT FIRST Democrats." I recently purchased a copy of Mr. Pizzo's book "Inside Job- The Looting of America's S&L" because I realized that Republicans are ONCE AGAIN DOING to America what they did in the '80s - get us chump taxpayers to HAND OVER BILLIONS to their cronies and donors.

Speaking of, "WHEW!" I just spent from 8am to 2:30 pm writing a compilation of Democrat's RETREAT ISSUES, and blew past the Alternet 2,500 word limit even on 4th and 5th edits! WHERE to start?

#1. the Sen. Patty Murray Amendment to SUPPORT THE TROOPS. This amendment $2.7 B to fund Veteran's rehab and medical for returning Iraq war vets - was SHOT DOWN on STRAIGHT PARTY LINE VOTE by Repugs. STUPID DEM 'leaders" are CLUELESS to make this a FIGHTING ISSUE. NOT making it a fighting issue GIVES the evil Repubs the "Moral Values" HIGH GROUND- they can portray Dems as being AGAINST THE TROOPS (for not supporting the war) even though THEY are the ***-****s who DON'T SUPPORT THE TROOPS! Dem. leadership should be FLOGGED for this INCOMPETENT, NEGLIGENT, DERELICTION IN DUTY apathy.

#2. Katrina/New Orleans. Every soldier, general, or even armchair warrior knows you can win the battle, and loose the war. We US taxpayers are spending BILLIONS on Katrina clean-up - WITH NO OVERALL PLAN to make NO safe and secure. As Sen. Landrieu (D-LA) said on radio yesterday, AMSTERDAM is below sea-level- the Dutch and Europeans haven't GIVEN UP on AMSTERDAM! Dems should be SPEAKING IN ONE VOICE: Demand a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION of FEMA's KATRINAL CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE, and demand a COMPREHENSIVE PLAN to restore Mississippi River wetlands and NO dykes.

A new article by Semour Hersh in the New Yorker says that Bush is becoming increasingly ISOLATED from staff and advisors, as he prays to be seen as the leader who delivered "democracy" to Iraq. (He is actually aiding the Shiite theocrats to crush the Sunnis whom his father supported for 20 years.) Democrats, TELL BUSH TO GET OUT OF HIS WH prayer-chapel, and GO LEAD THE REBUILDING OF NEW ORLEANS!

#3. Diebold- Disenfranchisement of American voters. Democrats SIT ON THEIR HANDS, as a class-action lawsuit alleges CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY by Diebold's (until yesterday) CEO, Wally O'Dell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bill Scheurer
Posted by: wcscheurer on Dec 14, 2005 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is an alternative!

www.WinWithBill.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hell...yes???
Posted by: Scorphitman on Dec 14, 2005 11:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A great solution...one year and we are out. The terrorist murderers leave a wake up call for 01/01/2007 and it once again open season on Shiites, Kurds and anyone who opposes a corruption of the faith of Islam. Murderers win again. Smoked too much dope in the 60's Mr. Pizzo?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hell...yes??? Posted by: Ahimsa
» RE: Hell...yes??? Posted by: Scorphitman
re "RETREAT FIRST Democrats!" rather SWITCH than FIGHT, pt. 2 Diebold-systematic VOTE FRAUD
Posted by: FFA on Dec 14, 2005 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mentioning DIEBOLD brings us to John Kerry's awful campaign in 2004. It was so awful that a Washington Post cartoonist depicted Kerry and Edwards as "Rip Van Winkle", ASLEEP through the whole campaign season. Sure, John Kerry "won" the debate points - but he LOST the debate battle! Kerry stood their like a deer caught in headlights - like a PUNCHING BAG! - as President Bush said on national TV "My opponent is a FLIP FLOPPER." Kerry was either a.) too stupid, or b.) too corrupted (dedicated to throwing the election) to comeback with the OBVIOUS REPLY: "My opponent, president Bush, pedged to get Osama bin Laden 'DEAD OR ALIVE' after the 9-11 attacks, and then at at 2003 Oct. White House press conference, Mr. Bush said "I'm NOT THAT CONCERNED ABOUT bin Laden any more." Not only is Mr. Bush a FLIP-FLOPPER, but he is an INCOMPETENT COMMANDER IN CHIEF, who LET America's MOST DANGEROUS ENEMY ESCAPE at Tora Bora, handing the job of capturing Ossama to America's Afghan mercenaries, because Mr. Bush was already then hoarding troops to start the Iraq war."

Move-on.org produced a video of Bush's video-tapped comments. The Kerry campaign REFUSED TO USE THIS ELECTION SMASHING ad showing Mr. Bush LYING IN HIS OWN WORDS, thereby HANDING not only election 2004 to Mr. Bush, but also his reputation-facade as "doing what he says" "straight shooter" as well!!!
This short discussion of Kerry's abysmal 2004 campaign barely has space to mention the "SWIFT BOATING" of not just Mr. Kerry, but the media who looked into Mr. Bush's AWOL record as well. Leave it to the Democratic WIMPS to make Mr. Bush's drunken, AWOL, did-not-report-for-duty record look more flattering than John Kerry's combat tour in Vietnam, complete with "Purple Heart" WIA medals. The Swiift Boat veterans smeared Mr. Kerry's Vietnam service record, allowing other Republicans to concentrate on Kerry's Vietnam war opposition. Mr. Kerry should have been prepared for both. In sum, his preparation totatalled getting some of his gun-boat compatriots to vouch for his prowness and virtues. It was enough to win Kerry the Iowa primaries, but Kerry never even tried to counter the Swift Boat smear squad, much less successfully.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

re "Retreat First!" Democrats... pt. 3 the Lieberman-Daschle angle
Posted by: FFA on Dec 14, 2005 12:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
#5. Democrats REFUSED, REFUSED, REFUSED to make ENRON an issue, sitting on their hands as the Enron meltdown defrauded workers, pensioners, taxpayers, and investors alike of billions of dollars, then the Democrats REPEATED their apathy as remnants of the Enron empire DEFRAUDED California rate-payers of billions more dollars through RIGGED bidding systems and coordinated power-plant shutdowns!

The Enron debacle shows what happens to clueless Democrats when they ENABLE (by apathy/inertia/incompetence/complicity) Republican-corporate CORRUPTION. To begin with, California Governor was served up as TOAST to California voters, who tossed him out of office mere months after reelecting him! Over in the US Senate, Senators Daschle and Lieberman were the two Democratic Party bosses most responsible for throwing a WET BLANKET on making ENRON CORRUPTION an issue for the Democrats in the 2002 midterm (Congressional) elections, an issue which would NEGATE the Republican mantra of "MORAL VALUES!" by defining the Republicans as the PARTY OF ENRON CORRUPTION.

Senator Daschle's "be nice" wimpishness NEGATED Senator Jim Jeffords (Vt.) courageous DEFECTION from the Republican Party, which handed the Sen. Majority Leader job BACK to Daschle in the first place! (And the chair of the Senate Government Affairs Committee to Senator Lieberman.) Senator Lieberman WHITEWASHED the ENRON CONNECTION to Texas Governor-, Presidential candidate-, and President George W. Bush. (Here's an official senate release that illustrates Lieberman's WHITEWASH. The title alone gives the whitewash away; by muddying the water, Lieberman minimizes both CRIMINAL CONDUCT, and the Enron CONNECTIONS to the Bush-Republican party. "The Role of Financial Institutions in Enron's Collapse." http://www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/073002lieberman.htm)
For his serial wimpishness/go-along/don't put up a fight/ Senator Daschle not only LOST the Senate Dem. majority (again, UNDOING Senator Jeffords' courageous switch), but even lost HIS OWN SENATE SEAT in South Dakota- a small state where he (as the powerful Sen. Majority Leader) had brought BILLIONS of dollars are federal "PORK" spending home to his less-than one million constituents! Fortunately, the Democrats are no longer burdened by the ROLL OVER, RETREAT FIRST 'leadership' of Daschle in the Senate, or Gray Davis as Repub. punching bag in California, but the Democrats are still with Lieberman.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Steve B
Posted by: sbartram on Dec 14, 2005 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
B R A V O!!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It won't get better until the DLC is stopped
Posted by: Rubyduby on Dec 14, 2005 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every single person who speaks out against Dean and Murtha and those trying to make sense of Iraq are DLCers. Nothing will change until the DLC is strangled to death.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Here Here! Posted by: texshelters
...not to mention confused...
Posted by: AlfTupper on Dec 14, 2005 12:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
>Republican thugs also attacked Dean for saying that U.S. troops were "terrorizing Iraqi women and children in their own homes." <

It wasn't Dean, it was Kerry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Demos like war too
Posted by: texshelters on Dec 14, 2005 1:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems clear to me that it is not cowardous that keeps many Democrats from standing up against the war, it's that MANY DEMOCRATS SUPPORT THE WAR and they want to continue to dictate to other nations how they should run their countries.

Democrats have a time honored tradition of saying, "We will have a New Deal at home" (Roosevelt), a "Fair Deal", Truman a "Great Society" (Johnson) while abusing their power overseas in ill conceived interventions such as Korea, Japan and Cuba among others. Why should we ever think Democrats could take leadership on the issues of US intervention and Imperialism? Democrats are New Money Imperialists. Try Green, Socialist, Peace and Freedom and even Libertarian parties if you want an anti-intervention government. We can also support candidates that support troop withdrawal and avoid the Hillary for President call by the DNC.

Peace,
Tex Shelters

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pelosi supports the war, too
Posted by: ScottP on Dec 14, 2005 2:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not just Hillary. Look beneath Pelosi's rhetoric to see that she has voted in favor of all the war funding. Voting for war funding is voting for bombs flattening apartment buildings, depleted uranium munitions, and napalm. The propaganda about reconstruction is convincing for a child but not for a thinking adult. Speeches are fine for testing the waters, but what counts is the vote when the funding resolution comes. No money, no war.

Adam Schiff (D-CA) also voted for funding the killing spree. I called his office and emailed and laid it on them repeatedly for that. However, he is still far better than his Republican predecessors in the district, Jim "do-nothing-besides-harass-Clinton" Rogan and Carlos "Savings-and-Loan-scandal-leader" Moorehead. They all are pro-war, but at least Schiff is also pro-choice and pro-environment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pelosi supports the war, too Posted by: monkeywrench
AMEN!
Posted by: Robba29 on Dec 14, 2005 2:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hell, yes! That's why I'm not Democrat--they've become Republican-Lite. Nader had it right when he characterized both parties as indistinguishable, as "Republicrats." We need a progressive party--one that can win. I love the Green Party, and am currently registered as a Green voter, but they've got issues, too--most important of which is that they have zero resonance with the public. Maybe Dean should start his own party, Murtha can join, and we can start Democracy anew.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Addendum Posted by: Robba29
» RE: AMEN! Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: AMEN! Posted by: Robba29
Right on, Steve!
Posted by: katinmn on Dec 14, 2005 2:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm ready for a fight, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THIS IS NOT YOUR FATHER'S DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Posted by: Bushhater on Dec 14, 2005 3:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sadly, the current crop of this party's leaders, with very few exceptions, HAS NO BALLS! Where are the standard bearers and torch bearers in this party that gave us FDR, JFK, RFK, the New Deal, and the Great Society? When Bush, Rush, et al say jump, JoeLieb, Biden, and others ask "how high" for fear as somehow being unpatrioitic and unAmerican if they should even question much less challenge the Bushies on any policy, foreign or domestic..Dems need to grow a pair, find some backbone, or this country will become a facist police state along the lines of Nazi Germany(the Patriot Act is moving us this way already). Remember the words of Rev. Niemoller(when they came for the jews, I did not speak up because I was not a jew- when they came for the social democrats, I did not speak up, because I was not a social democrat-etc, when they came for me, there was no one left to speak up).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

walkerro.PHD
Posted by: walkerro.PHD on Dec 14, 2005 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nicely done! If only the offenders would take the time to read your heartfelt concerns, that so much reflect the concerns of their constituents. I can only wonder what this Bushian Administration and Republican party at large have on these weak-kneed Democrats, that for the most part keeps them silent and retreating. Why have they renigged on so many of their promises and comitments? As I understand it, we are in a declared war; a war they clearly authorized. If so, what is so different about their behaviors, than that of a soldier abandoning his/her post? They should be held accountable, as would an offending soldier?.

Again, thanks for sharing your heartfelt thoughts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wow, what an article
Posted by: curious George on Dec 14, 2005 4:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, I'm amazed that there is so much resentment (hate)for both
political parties here. Please take time to consider this,
as a republican I agree there needs to be change,
However pulling out of Iraq on schedule brings back memories of our withdrawal from SE Asia.
If I could go over a couple of things
1: ANY man who rises to potus I would never consider a fool.
2: Talking about why or how we got into Iraq is a waste of breath. We are there, it is war, and that is all that matters.
3. We Must win.
4. George w. Bush will not be on the ballot in 08, Move on.
5. Democrats please, please stand up and tell us what you stand for. we republicans don't know, and Stick to it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: wow, what an article Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: wow, what an article Posted by: goleft
Fight The Dinos
Posted by: hoscot on Dec 14, 2005 6:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pizzo has it right. I've quit talking. These dinos are proof against entreties because they feel secure in their incumbancy. However, they do have an achilles heel, and that is the PRIMARIES . If any "FEISTY DEMOCRAT" runs against that carpet bagger, Hillary Clinton, in the coming NY primary, I will vote for him or her. If Hillary is nominated and runs for a return to the Senate. I will write in a vote for Lady Macbeth. Such a protest vote would come late to save our country, but enough of them would have more effect than abstention.
Revolution begins at home, and that is in the Democratic primaries by groups of "FEISTY DEMOCRATS" arising nation-wide!!!!!
Unfortunately, I'm 79 years old and living in Switzerland, but I'll back "FEISTY DEMOCRAT" groups any way I can.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

how to escape the whorehouse?
Posted by: mwildfire on Dec 14, 2005 6:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just read through all the posts here (though not all the replies) and it seems like almost everyone gets it: the problem with Dems is not that they lack courage, it's that they're beholden to the same corporate interests as the Repugs. Whether in the statehouse or the big one in DC, a citizen wanting something from his/her representatives is in essentially the same position, if you'll excuse my vulgar analogy, as a flat-broke, horny man standing in a whorehouse. With no cash, we're just not going to get any action there... because, as in a whorehouse, they're all expecting to be paid for their favors.
The problem is not individual reps or even the two parties. It's the system that guarantees this result. Even if we somehow got a legitimate third party in place, ir would be just a matter of time until it was as corrupt as Thing One and Thing Two. We must have campaign finance reform if we want to change the system. But who's gonna bell the cat? To get campaign finance reform requires a change in laws. To get that, you need the existing Congress and statehouse reps to vote for it. Every one of them got there under the current system--the only way they'd vote for change (which would help challengers against incumbents) is by creating a massive grassroots pressure campaign, so that it would cost them their seats to vote No. Now how do you generate that kind of pressure without using the mainstream media--which gets more money from campaign ads than anything else? which is now so seamlessly joined with the other two components of the corporate/government/media complex that there is no longer daylight between the three? Is it better to try to get in with a third party or to somehow reform the Dems? Hard to say--seems like our enemies have all the exits covered.
With Peak Oil looming, along with global warming and other environmental crises, we desperately need real, farsighted, courageous leadership. Instead we have leadership so bad it's hard to credit that it could be real (how could anyone simultaneously be as inept and as destructive as the Bush Administration? How could anyone always do the worst possible thing, on EVERY issue?) And no alternative in sight.
Yet...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of course....
Posted by: Asses of Evil on Dec 14, 2005 7:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like Murtha said, the American people are way ahead of the pols on this one. It's amazing, you'd think the Republicans' policies were working as cautious as Dems were to challenge them. And you wonder why this country is going down the toilet..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dear Curiois
Posted by: dphel on Dec 14, 2005 7:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Potus not a fool ? Would you accept "moron" ?

2.It isn't a war, it's an illegal occupation.

3. Win ? We're not going to win anything.

4. No, George will be in a penitentiary.

5. Dems won't stand up for anything, they're in it up to their ears.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I will not vote for these cowards again
Posted by: aameriowa on Dec 14, 2005 8:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 2004 convention, 90% of delegates were anti war. Hillary, Kerry, Edwards are too scared. It would take the same 90% of the real democrats to find who speak for them. We are poweful but we caved in with Kerry (remember Dean, Kuccinich) . It is not impossible. Republicans may win the misinformed "Christians" again. But I am not voting for somebody who has no spine. The Corps and defense (War) industry is behind this. They misinformed the public and stood by singing patriotic songs and waving flags until they got us deep in doodoo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Repub Atrocities, Dem wimpers...
Posted by: FFA on Dec 15, 2005 6:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For every Republican propaganda ATROCITY, the Democrats COULD BAND TOGETHER and demand public support and media coverage. This the Democrats REFUSE to do....

On heels of MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR TAX CUTS for the hyper-wealthy, Bush-GOP SLASHES research and education funding, while kerry-dlc Dems COWER in their georgetown cocktail-circuit rat-holes.....


Congress Cuts Research, Education Spending
By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press Writer
Wed Dec 14, 9:26 PM ET
http://news.yahoo.com

WASHINGTON - Congressional Republicans made progress on twin tracks Wednesday toward their end-of-year budget goals, passing a bill freezing or cutting back spending on medical research and education and nearing agreement on cuts to the Medicaid health care program for the poor.
The first measure, a $602 billion bill funding a wide variety of health, education and labor programs, passed the House on a 215-213 vote. It would cut federal aid to education for the first time in a decade, and spread about $1.4 billion in cuts across the departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education.
_______

Ernest Partridge: 'Dear Howard Dean: Why bother?
to:
DNC Chairman
Dear Dr. Dean,

Republicans build the voting machines, Republicans write the secret software, Republicans count and compile the totals. The Republican machines allow no auditing of the vote totals they report. So Republicans have the ability to "win" elections, regardless of the will of the voters.  There is compelling evidence that they have done just that.
And so, if nothing is done to end the privatization of our elections and to introduce reliable verification, the Republicans will "win" again in November 2006 and then in 2008. Today, eleven months before the mid-term election, the outcome is fore-ordained - as certain as Soviet elections under Stalin, and Iraqi elections under Saddam. For, as Stalin said, "Those who cast the votes decide nothing, those who count the votes decide everything."
___________________________

Kerry WON the most voter's votes in Ohio, Iowa, New Mexico, and Nevada in 2004 (and thereby the US presidency); he prefers cowering in silence (basking in the Georgetown/Boston cocktail circuit) to ensuring that American voter's votes are counted fairly...
http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2005/1556

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NO mystery -- Ask who finances the Democratic party...
Posted by: arseniamarie on Dec 16, 2005 4:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, we are all hollerin about the Democrats and their hypocrisy - the entire system is based on hypocrisy because the men and women who FINANCE the elections... that means the men and women who give the BIG BUCKS -- they are the ones our legislators serve.

Elected officials pretend to represent all of us - they DON"T>

they follow the money... and the MONEY is from Israeli supporters.

I have suggested this hijacking of an entire government by a foreign nation is TREASON.... again... nobody wants to say it out loud ... but it is treason.

Dual loyalty Americans [and that's not just Jews] -- Christian evangelicals and Jews control the congress and the president with MONEY...

the rest of us?

We simply don't matter. Jefferson would be apoplectic. The United States of America is now under the command of a foreign nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

At last -- a Solution --- BLAME THE JEWS!!
Posted by: TheStranger on Dec 16, 2005 11:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And now I have to hear from anti-Semites? Jesus fucking christ. I regret ever wearing the uniform of this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SOVIET-STYULE ELCTIONS IN GOOD OLE U.S.A.
Posted by: TheStranger on Dec 16, 2005 11:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
99% [no exaggeration] of all House incumbents who run for re-election are re-elected. That's because old-fashioned gerrymandering of districts is now married to computerization. We used to laugh at those old Soviet elections because we knew everything was preordained and the elections were just theater. No one seems to notice that we are now heirs to the Soviet election system. The Dems and Reps make themselves safe seats, make briber legal [often called campaign contributions, but there are many, many bribery scams] and split the loot.

And you expect these people to stand up and care about issues? They care about the collection plate. This country has already been sold. Bush is just more blatant than the others, busy taking from everyone else to give to the super-rich. The people who founded this country would never stand for this crap. We have become a nation of sheep, lulled by video games and other nauseating news-tainment from the giant, multinational corporations that bought the government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We need to restore representation answerable to us.
Posted by: Riverside on Dec 18, 2005 2:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All political parties today bow and scrape to corporate and special interest groups that use money to control our government. Those folks WE THE PEOPLE elected do not represent us or feel obligated to speak for us in Congress. We are just performing the acts of a fake democracy.

We need to not just organize a new progressive party, we need to reach out to as many fellow citizens as we can REGARDLESS of their present political convictions. It is truly time for all of us to come together to save this great nation. IF we do it right then we can dispute out differences through our elected representatives in the state and national legislatures as our Constitution intended.

Remember civil liberty is not a free ride. It must be earned and protected. We need to stop complaining and start acting, NOW.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sever ties
Posted by: goleft on Dec 19, 2005 3:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll join a new party that vows to sever all ties to the military-industrial complex, the oil&gas-foreign policy complex, the banking-insurance complex, the corporate media-academia complex, the mining-timber-agribusiness complex, the pharmaceutical-medical complex, the PR-Madison Avenue complex.......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement