Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The 14 Worst Corporate Evildoers

By A Global Exchange Report . Posted December 12, 2005.


On issues like war crimes, torture, toxic dumping and stifling freedom of speech, corporations like Coca Cola, Chevron and Philip Morris are way out ahead of the rest.
121205_story
Advertisement

Corporations carry out some of the most horrific human rights abuses of modern times, but it is increasingly difficult to hold them to account. Economic globalization and the rise of transnational corporate power have created a favorable climate for corporate human rights abusers, which are governed principally by the codes of supply and demand and show genuine loyalty only to their stockholders.

Several of the companies below are being sued under the Alien Tort Claims Act, a law that allows citizens of any nationality to sue in US federal courts for violations of international rights or treaties. When corporations act like criminals, we have the right and the power to stop them, holding leaders and multinational corporations alike to the accords they have signed. Around the world--in Venezuela, Argentina, India, and right here in the United States--citizens are stepping up to create democracy and hold corporations accountable to international law.

Caterpillar

For years, the Caterpillar Company has provided Israel with the bulldozers used to destroy Palestinian homes. Despite worldwide condemnation, Caterpillar has refused to end its corporate participation house demolition by cutting off sales of specially modified D9 and D10 bulldozers to the Israeli military.

In a letter to Caterpillar CEO James Owens, The Office of the UN High Commissioner on Human Rights said: "allowing the delivery of your ... bulldozers to the Israeli army ... in the certain knowledge that they are being used for such action, might involve complicity or acceptance on the part of your company to actual and potential violations of human rights..."

Peace activist Rachel Corrie was killed by a Caterpillar D-9, military bulldozer in 2003. She was run over while attempting to block the destruction a family's home in Gaza. Her family filed suit against Caterpillar in March 2005 charging that Caterpillar knowingly sold machines used to violate human rights. Since Corrie's death at least three more Palestinians have been killed in their homes by Israeli bulldozer demolitions.

Chevron

The petrochemical company Chevron is guilty of some of the worst environmental and human rights abuses in the world. From 1964 to 1992, Texaco (which transferred operations to Chevron after being bought out in 2001) unleashed a toxic "Rainforest Chernobyl" in Ecuador by leaving over 600 unlined oil pits in pristine northern Amazon rainforest and dumping 18 billion gallons of toxic production water into rivers used for bathing water. Llocal communities have suffered severe health effects, including cancer, skin lesions, birth defects, and spontaneous abortions.

Chevron is also responsible for the violent repression of peaceful opposition to oil extraction. In Nigeria, Chevron has hired private military personnel to open fire on peaceful protestors who oppose oil extraction in the Niger Delta.

Additionally Chevron is responsible for widespread health problems in Richmond, California, where one of Chevron's largest refineries is located. Processing 350,000 barrels of oil a day, the Richmond refinery produces oil flares and toxic waste in the Richmond area. As a result, local residents suffer from high rates of lupus, skin rashes, rheumatic fever, liver problems, kidney problems, tumors, cancer, asthma, and eye problems.

The Unocal Corporation, which recently became a subsidiary of Chevron, is an oil and gas company based in California with operations around the world. In December 2004, the company settled a lawsuit filed by 15 Burmese villagers, in which the villagers alleged Unocal's complicity in a range of human rights violations in Burma, including rape, summary execution, torture, forced labor and forced migration.

Coca-Cola

Coca-Cola Company is perhaps the most widely recognized corporate symbol on the planet. The company also leads in the abuse of workers' rights, assassinations, water privatization, and worker discrimination. Between 1989 and 2002, eight union leaders from Coca-Cola bottling plants in Colombia were killed after protesting the company's labor practices. Hundreds of other Coca-Cola workers who have joined or considered joining the Colombian union SINALTRAINAL have been kidnapped, tortured, and detained by paramilitaries who are hired to intimidate workers to prevent them from unionizing.

In India, Coca-Cola destroys local agriculture by privatizing the country's water resources. In Plachimada, Kerala, Coca-Cola extracted 1.5 million liters of deep well water, which they bottled and sold under the names Dasani and BonAqua. The groundwater was severely depleted, affecting thousands of communities with water shortages and destroying agricultural activity. As a result, the remaining water became contaminated with high chloride and bacteria levels, leading to scabs, eye problems, and stomach aches in the local population.

Coca-Cola is also one of the most discriminatory employers in the world. In the year 2000, 2,000 African-American employees in the U.S. sued the company for race-based disparities in pay and promotions.


Digg!

Visit Global Exchange to read the full report of the Most Wanted Corporate Human Rights Violators of 2005, and find out how to connect with groups that are doing something about corporate abuses.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Small correction
Posted by: Presh on Dec 12, 2005 12:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jst a quick note, the Dow Chemical plant was in New Plymouth, not Plymouth.

Cheers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you are not sick in your stomach & heart, you did not read this article
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Dec 12, 2005 12:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the way of world corporations do business by abusing the world's poorest people. I noticed most of these corporations were started in the USA. I do not know when corporate boards and dividends became the number one priority. Used to be if you got 4-7% on your investment, it was a good stock. Now they want over 20% and they do not care how they make it. Too bad all those self-righteous Christian people are not in caring about people business. They could take their energy and put it into fighting these world wreckers. They care more about Ford advertising in gay magazines than what Ford does to our environment in this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What can be done? Posted by: qrswave
no Sony?
Posted by: ROT on Dec 12, 2005 12:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can we add Sony to list?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: no Sony? Posted by: alternetjunkie
Incorporation = Treason
Posted by: SFRosalyne on Dec 12, 2005 3:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hardly surprising behaviour since the very concept if incorporation is designed to dodge taxes nobody else can't.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Incorporation = Treason Posted by: rickcreswell@yahoo.com
» RE: Incorporation = Treason Posted by: esfisher
» RE: Incorporation = Treason Posted by: jlohman
» RE: Incorporation = Treason Posted by: clarence
Yikes!
Posted by: tcunning on Dec 12, 2005 3:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Goodness, it is so difficult now to keep track of all the nasty companies and all their products and various names. What I find the most worrisome is that some progressive groups focus on just one issue and tell us to buy from these corporations. (ex:Texaco and Ford are "gay-friendly") I am sure they do not mean to be insensitive to other issues; it is just quite a job to keep tabs on everything. Does anyone know of a website that is all-inclusive on progressive issues and can provide clear advice on the thousands of products on the market today? I wish there were some type of law that would require all corporations to clearly identify themselves. This name-changing trick is just plain underhanded.

Also, please visit:
www.dowethics.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yikes! Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Yikes! Posted by: placid
» Responsible shopping... Posted by: gregaignon
Even in the Annals of Evil, It's Always All About US
Posted by: redmaple on Dec 12, 2005 4:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although I give little credibility to lists (including Letterman's "Top 10" and Billboards "Top 100"), the inventory of the "14 worst" firms is amusing. I do wonder, though, why only one of the most egregious companies is "foreign" - and that one is French for goodness' sake. Why is it that, with you Americans, it's always about you? Are there no British, German, Swiss - to say nothing of Russian corporations that are as environmentally unfriendly, unethical and just plain corrupt?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mind boggling
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Dec 12, 2005 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only reason anyone starts a business is to make a profit. To expect corporations to have any other goal is unrealistic. Boycotts are an effective tool but they are hard to organize and publicize. Also there are so many criminals that the average consumer can only be aware of a small percentage of them. The only way to control corporations is through law. One control would be to grant corporate licenses that would have to be renewed periodically. The license of any corporation that did not serve the public interest would not be renewed. Broadcasting companies can operate profitably under this system and so could any corporation. Of course, such a law cannot be enacted or enforced while powerful corporatons control both political parties. Our representative government represents the rich and powerful not the average citizen. Ordinary citizens must take extraordinary action to bring our government under control. Click on do it now

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Capitalism is the reason Posted by: Brucewxx
» RE: Capitalism is the reason Posted by: Wildbot
» RE: Mind boggling Posted by: pg
» RE: Mind boggling Posted by: Lincoln fan
Songaweek
Posted by: Songaweek on Dec 12, 2005 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps the newly reclassified Ultra - Mega corporation, Procter & Gamble, (now with added Gillette) could make the list as well. Job cuts, health care cuts enroute to health care elimination, outrageous job injury record... and if people only knew what they dump into the Susquehanna River...

Or perhaps it's just my own bias that prompts this nomination?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

christian incorporation
Posted by: menckenman on Dec 12, 2005 5:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The bloodthirsty, demented, murderous insanity occasioned by the world water, oil, seed, land etc., resource grab by these concentrations of wealth is blithely hidden by the bland smiley face of Jesus.

The religious booboisie get their nuts off on it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» montana freeman Posted by: trace
Caterpillar?
Posted by: Barry Stock on Dec 12, 2005 5:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Including this one is a bit myopic, I believe. Yes, they do THAT, but how can a host of other weapons manufacturers be spared, causing carnage on a worldwide scale, and Caterpillar be included, for these senseless, but statistically less significant killings? How did they end up here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Caterpillar? Posted by: maxpayne
quick correction re: pfizer
Posted by: gunsoveravalon on Dec 12, 2005 6:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just a quick correction to an otherwise (mostly) fine article. Fluconazole is an anti-FUNGAL not an anti-retroviral drug. It is not used to fight AIDS in any way, but merely to treat opportunistic fungal infections that tend to come up in people who don't have a functioning immune system to fight them off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Catepillar was always a tough one to nail I thought
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 12, 2005 6:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mean for them it's just about business and their bottom line. If not one bulldozing company, then another would take its place. Like in the USA, the rightwing in Israel would go out on a limb to throw ethics out the window just for political expediency and I'll bet it's only a matter of enticing Catepillar with the biggest albeit extremely unethical lucrative deals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why give a pass to the really evil abusers?
Posted by: Doug on Dec 12, 2005 7:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sins of the listed corporations pale into insignificance compared to those of people who get their hands on state power and cannot be dismissed. Fidel Castro, the Chinese Communist Party ... there are your real human rights abusers. Watch those socialists!

Doug

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Why does one evil excuse another? Posted by: Michaelmammal
Expanding on horrific human rights abuse in modern times
Posted by: threedfm on Dec 12, 2005 7:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The more things change the more they stay the same . It seems that it's not just human's that are suffering because of corporate power that have created a favorable climate for the selling of skins of CATS and DOGS , that are sold as fur trim on clothing . Did anyone out there see Larry King's Show Sunday nite , about the cruel way China allows the killing of dogs and cats . If you did , you would have been horrified at the way they killed them and the look on the faces of the cats and dogs . They put a wire around the necks and hang the cats . They tie the dogs by the lower jaw with wire to a post and then start skining them alive . How do we get this stopped ? Who can help ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another correction
Posted by: jdwilliams on Dec 12, 2005 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's Kellogg Brown & Root...not "Brand".

The Houston construction company, Brown & Root, was a beneficiary of plenty o' pork back in the LBJ days.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another correction Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Another correction Posted by: croghan27
sareena99
Posted by: sareena99 on Dec 12, 2005 7:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no love for drug companies that put medicines out of the reach of the poor. It is always a good idea, though, to get your facts straight.
Diflucan (made by Pfizer) is an antifungal drug. Yes, many AIDS patients use it to fight their opportunistic yeast infections, but it does not affect the actual AIDS (HIV) virus at all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Fact WAS Straight Posted by: AdamSelene11726
Another Correction
Posted by: hbw on Dec 12, 2005 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's Kellogg, Brown and Root. Kellogg-Briand is some historical pact (see this).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The very purpose of incorporation
Posted by: rickcreswell@yahoo.com on Dec 12, 2005 7:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Articles of incorporation were developed in order to limit shareholder liability. Incorporation, from its beginning in the 1600s , has been a license to wrong doing and promise-breaking with legal impunity. This is true in any nation that licenses corporations. Is it any wonder that the biggest corporations are the worst offenders?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Maze
Posted by: placid on Dec 12, 2005 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I recently made some changes in my portfolio and it is obvious to me that the investments I hold reflect me.Some of the corporations listed I want no part of so in making the changes I spoke with my financial advisor to make investments in socially responsible corporations and the are out there.It can be tricky when corporations have what I call, "the long fingers of subsidiaries." It was/ is quite frightening to look at charts and see how so few are engaged in so much. That is the maze.I am undrstood by some that I purchase some items from questionable corporations and there are places I will not go,such as Wal-Mart (I do not darken the doorways of that corporation...and they are also entering THE MAZE via buyouts. As far as boycotts, I usually don't any business there , but some I do. I look at the list (thank you for compiling it!And will definitely do more homework. As far as owning any stock purchase I want to be as congruent as possible. What on earth happened to what I remember being called anti-trust laws?I can imagine, and the world of "loopholes" I have yet to fully investigate (to me it is "dry" and I have a strong feeling I amnot alone so many are intentionally kept "ignorant" which seems very much a priority to this administration due to it's "sleeping with the corporations." Money cuts for education will lead to a generation of ill-informed citizens. That will make us ,as has happened in the world MANY times,easy to turn a nation into "sheeple". I am no alarmist,yet an ignorant citizenry is so easy to manipulate. I'd say most of who come to this site are concerned about education,truth,cleareyed trust,human rights,our ecomomy and jobs. There had been a five year period of manipulating us(mentioned some methods) plus fear ,USING FEAR for votes. Thanks, for a forum for expression (predominenly marvelous articles and thoughtful feedback.Thanks again ! Mary Basombrio aka Placid

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Maze Posted by: pzzp
Too Big to Take it All In
Posted by: yogistein on Dec 12, 2005 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While the article is great (disturbing are the corrections by commentators), note that the corporations are large. What about the corner hot dog stand? Your local organic grocery? The used toy store?

Moreover, there is not one mention that actual people work in an organized form that we identify as corporations.

Have you ever seen a corporation? No, but every reader "represents" one--you all have the soot and pollution in you from them. We all carry a Body Burden from unregulated toxic chemicals. And none of us would have the conveniences we do have, such as cell phones, without them.

When an Us v. Them attitude is cultivated then a loss perspective ensues. Demonization of the corporation omits the fact that people just like you and me work there. I'd rather see an inclusive perspective be disseminated, like stories from those who work for the corporations. Then activists could develop methods to of changing the public's mind that would truly be effective.

Please understand that I do not support what these corporations are doing now. They have surreptitiously and underhandedly gained the power they have over the last 200 years, morphing from mere investment tools into powerful imaginary playmates that have run wild and out of control. Of course, when someone works for the corporation, the pursuit of profit changes their outlook as they pursue profit, just like the Milgram experiment of so long ago where humans hurt other humans at the behest of an authority figure.

Conscious and informed activism is what I am pushing for, here.

Jonathan Frieman
Center for Corporate Policy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Too Big to Take it All In Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Too Big to Take it All In Posted by: A. James
Garden chemicals by Chevron
Posted by: jbrags on Dec 12, 2005 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chevron's array of garden chemicals gives even the smallest among us a chance to poison the land. Jack

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

monty
Posted by: mo on Dec 12, 2005 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
can we please have some names and maybe even some pictures of the faces of the people who pull the strings at these large organized crime syndicates.
there is no person named "chevron" who authorized the shooting of protestors but there is a real person who organized and gave the go ahead for thier private army to murder third world citizens. WHAT ARE THEIR NAMES?
AND WHAT DO THEY LOOK LIKE? PLEASE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: monty Posted by: Tai Moses
» RE: monty Posted by: flame
Utopian Hypocrites
Posted by: pg on Dec 12, 2005 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You all bash great companies, employing a lot of good people and many of the companies have done a lot of good in the world. Every one of you jags posting is a supporter of DOW and other chemical companies. Who do you think makes the plastic that encases your computer? You all drive cars made by Ford and others and probably complain about high gas prices too. You all drive your Ford cars on roads made by caterpillar. You all live in a country defended by the evil likes of Lockheed. If you were all spouting off like you are in China you would be dead or in prison, but screw that evil Lockheed that helps protect your freedom. And youall can thank Pfizer that you are alive today cuz your great grampa would likely be dead to some bug if the company had not figurted out how produce penicillin in large quantities. The companies are not perfect and like people, some have done bad things but they are not the dasterdly, world wrecking monsters you all make them out to be either. So sell your cars, stop using sudafed and dont you dare fix those levees in New Orleand using any Caterpillar equipment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Utopian Hypocrites Posted by: secular
» RE: Utopian Hypocrites Posted by: mom'z the word
» RE: Utopian Hypocrites Posted by: kryptx
» RE: Utopian Hypocrites Posted by: Lincoln fan
Making copies
Posted by: mom'z the word on Dec 12, 2005 9:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for a most imformative article. I made copies and am leaving them in conspicious areas, coffee shops, internet cafes, my place of business, college libraries, city libraries and anywhere else people are malling around looking for something to read. Good Job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A must see
Posted by: Knowmad on Dec 12, 2005 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone: I suggest you watch a documentary called 'The Corporation', though I suppose it's possibly banned in your country. Even so, search out a copy and give it a look. I think it will answer a lot of your questions about how such things as these 14 pariahs and others could come about in a supposedly free and caring society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: jsa9 on Dec 12, 2005 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe im wrong, but if my memory is correct, i believe the fine people living in the houses that were destroyed by Caterpillar, killed many Jews in and out of Israel. You know, the bomb stuff. I think its a great idea that the killers should have a nice warm home to come back to. To eat, sleep and build their bombs. All the other corporations, i agree with you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why? Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why? Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why? Posted by: russianblue1
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why? Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why? Posted by: Michaelmammal
Chevron but not Exxon?
Posted by: John Muir on Dec 12, 2005 10:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't claim to be a judge of all things, but I'm puzzled by a worst corporation list that includes Chevron, but doesn't even mention Exxon. As Jared Diamond documented in "Collapse," Chevron has been--believe it or don't--a conscientious company in New Guinea, determined to avoid not just pollution, but even simply road-building. He concluded that "In effect, their Kutubu oil field functions as by far the largest and most rigorously controlled national park in Papua New Guinea (446)."

Further, Chevron has been spending millions to bring public attention to global warming and the need to conserve oil, while ExxonMobil, by contrast, has been spending millions funding science-abusing think tanks that look for any and all possible reasons to minimize the very real threat of global warming, as documented by Chris Mooney in an April story in "Mother Jones."

I'm not a Chevron stockholder, have no involvement with the company, and wouldn't excuse their other failings. But this judgement doesn't make sense to me, and I have to say so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Chevron but not Exxon? Posted by: aonghus36
Could we hear a bit of good news too please?
Posted by: chippehogwa on Dec 12, 2005 10:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While always interested in these types of articles (albeit depressing), I wish someone would highlight those companies that actually do a good job of promoting the right values (e.g. Patagonia, CostCo, Interface, etc). Buying their products/services/stock probably does as much good as NOT buying those classified as "evil doers". Knowing there are alternatives voices in commerce gives us a bit of hope & inspiration...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» good news found here Posted by: Mike Turnauer, Vancouver,WA
» RE: good news found here Posted by: chippehogwa
Excellent start
Posted by: ScottP on Dec 12, 2005 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Identifying the worst corporations and their wrongdoing is a crucial step in the process of correcting problems. I think a next step is to identify individuals in the corporations who are driving this. They will probably be the ones with the most money (the CEO, etc). Having identified them legal proceedings could commence. Of course they own the US legal system, so nothing could be done here (even Ken Lay is still running free). However, they could be indicted in other countries, and nabbed during one of their trips.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Incredible
Posted by: Givhan on Dec 12, 2005 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone else get a kick out of how same liberals who sneer at the "simplistic" labeling of Muslim terrorists as evil never hesitate to apply that term to corporations? Suicide bombers and Al Qaedi are victims of society who we need to "understand." Ford Motor Company, on the other hand, is a destructive force that must be stopped at all costs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Incredible Posted by: Justwayne
» RE: Incredible Posted by: pg
» RE: Incredible Posted by: Fade
» RE: Incredible Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Incredible Posted by: pg
» RE: Incredible Posted by: Fade
» RE: Incredible Posted by: Fade
» RE: Incredible Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Incredible Posted by: mlhbogart
» RE: Incredible Posted by: kryptx
AlliantTechsystems, Edina, MN
Posted by: katinmn on Dec 12, 2005 1:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alliant was the largest supplier of anti-personnel landmines to the Department of Defense (DoD). They ended landmine production in 1997 but in January 2005, they announced they had a new joint contract to begin field testing their new next generation anti-personel landmine. In 1997, when asked by Human Rights Watch to sign a statement that ATK would not produce landmines in the future, Alliant refused, stating "if we don't make them, someone else will." Landmines are considered to be an indiscriminate weapon and illegal under International Law.

• Alliant has supplied over 16 million rounds of Depleted Uranium munitions to the DoD. Many leading scientist attribute, in part, DU munitions as a cause of the Gulf War Syndrome in American soldiers who served in the Middle East war.

• Alliant supplies all three rocket stages for the first strike submarine based Trident II (D5) nuclear missile, a weapon of mass destruction and illegal under International Law.

• Since the 1960s, ATK (Honeywell) has been suppling cluster bombs to the DoD and these were recently used in Afghanistan and Gulf War II (cluster bombs were also used in Kosovo and Gulf War I). The cluster bomb sub-munition is painted bright yellow, the same color the "aid" packages the US dropped in Afghanistan. The military claims a dud rate of 5% while some experts say it is closer to 20%. This weapon system continues to maim and kill civilans long after conflicts have ended. It is indiscriminate and thus illegal under International Law.

http://www.circlevision.org/alliantaction.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Beeva
Posted by: jnsmart on Dec 12, 2005 2:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Follow the Money !
Every one of these Corporations were and are heavy contributors to the W. Bush campaign of dissinformation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Beeva Posted by: Lincoln fan
Skyeblue
Posted by: skyeblue on Dec 12, 2005 2:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To really understand the workings of the corporatocracy, read, "Confessions of an Economic Hitman". These corporations are, with the complicity of the US, simultaneously controlling, exploiting slave labor and trashing the planet. Get scared....Get active....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Aspartame
Posted by: bodewell on Dec 12, 2005 2:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Monsanto produces Aspartame, which has been found to cause brain lesions. But they don't care. That is a contribution to the pharmaceutical industry, also Bush's allies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

thanks
Posted by: usingmemorytodream on Dec 12, 2005 5:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
thank you for existing, great article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporatism is an Attribute of Fascism
Posted by: Happy on Dec 12, 2005 7:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we have here in America is a corporatist state. The government has turned into the corporations' toady. This situation must be rectified or we will know insufferable tyranny. I suggest the development of an alternative society, independent of and wholly unreliant upon the current corporatist society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Corporatism is an Attribute of Fascism Posted by: mortarthegovernment
Other Troubles With Coke
Posted by: bernardowissel on Dec 12, 2005 10:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Beyond the matters mentioned in the report, the below are other reasons people of conscience should not support Coca-Cola:

Use of sugar refined from sugarcane hazardously harvested by children as young as 12. ( From Human Rights Watch --
http://www.hrw.org/children/labor/elsalvador/

Opposition to Bottle Bills ( See http://www.bottlebill.org/resources/news/news-cokepepsi.htm )

Aggressive Marketing to Children of Nutritionally Worthless and Damaging Products, Contributing to Obesity and Other Diseases. ( See http://www.commercialexploitation.org and http://www.schoolpouringrights.com/ )

Coca-Cola is intertwined through its directors with noxious companies, including Chevron-Texaco, General Electric, and Dow Chemical (current owner of Union Carbide from which victims of the Bhopal Disaster still seek justice).

Coca-Cola and leadership have been highly supportive of Bush and the Republicans.

Coke's opposition to bottle bills contributes to modern society's vast waste of plastic bottles and other consumer items in landfills rather than recycling and reusing the materials. If we did more reuse and recycling of products and wrapping materials, we would greatly decrease the use of fossil fuels and other virgin resources, diminishing the release of greenhouse gases and protecting the environment in other ways, as well as lessening dependency upon petroleum from the Middle East. In the past Coke has been highly resistant to environmental pressure to incorporate recycled materials in its bottles, and only after a multi-year campaign did the company agree to a 10% or so recycled target.

Coca-Cola's Dasani bottles are tinted blue to make the water seem alluring to consumers. Unfortunately the source of the blue tint makes the bottles difficult to recycle.

Regrettably, Hollywood allows Coca-Cola to pay for product placements in films and televisions shows, thereby encouraging people to support this dastardly company. Here is a way that actors and producers could join in solidarity with students and others campaigning against Coke.

Join with activists around the world to hold Coca-Cola accountable for its wrongs. Please visit the website www.KillerCoke.org or e-mail StopKillerCoke @ aol.com ; and also visit the websites of the other groups involved in pressuring Coca-Cola to become a better company.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's a matter of education...
Posted by: vtbaron on Dec 13, 2005 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was educated in Europe and came to the U.S. for a graduate degree. Imagine how surprised I was to be sitting in a class dealing with accounting and strategic management and be told that everything I had learned in Europe about social responsibility and the fact that employees are not chattel nor a liability was wrong, and that the only obligation a corporation (in the U.S., at least) is to its shareholders - nobody and nothing else matters!
When I raised my hand and asked about the "third column" every business must stand on -- its employees and society in general --I was reprimanded by the professor for raising a "deliberate distraction" and booed by a few of my American classmates.
This type of behavior is the norm in rah-rah, flag-waving, ill-educated, ill-mannered and thoughtless America. A very few smart members of the intelligentsia have seen fit to exploit the populace's Lemming-mentality to the form of its current zenith --the Bush administration and the willingness to rape, plunder and loot the coffers of state and bankrupt the moral credit the country once had and enjoyed around the world.
Anyone saying anything here these days against business is a pariah, an automatic outcast. After all, what's good for business must be good for America, right? Why is it that these very people, the poorest of the American poor, continue to support this administration's outright lies, corruption, hair-raising human rights and legal abuses and allow corporate America to run roughshod over their lives and accelerate the elimination of small business and the middle class? The answer is obvious: A lack of education. Since WWII, America has been on a "We're the biggest, baddest, bestest nation on Earth" binge, fueled by a complicit media and encouraged by a government rank with corruption and racketeering since Eisenhower's days.
Undoing and reeducating the people that need it most on the planet -- the Americans -- that their behavior is irresponsible, unacceptable and will not be tolerated by the rest of the global community is not something which will occur quickly or e