COMMENTS: 172
The 14 Worst Corporate Evildoers
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
Several of the companies below are being sued under the Alien Tort Claims Act, a law that allows citizens of any nationality to sue in US federal courts for violations of international rights or treaties. When corporations act like criminals, we have the right and the power to stop them, holding leaders and multinational corporations alike to the accords they have signed. Around the world--in Venezuela, Argentina, India, and right here in the United States--citizens are stepping up to create democracy and hold corporations accountable to international law.
Caterpillar
For years, the Caterpillar Company has provided Israel with the bulldozers used to destroy Palestinian homes. Despite worldwide condemnation, Caterpillar has refused to end its corporate participation house demolition by cutting off sales of specially modified D9 and D10 bulldozers to the Israeli military.
In a letter to Caterpillar CEO James Owens, The Office of the UN High Commissioner on Human Rights said: "allowing the delivery of your ... bulldozers to the Israeli army ... in the certain knowledge that they are being used for such action, might involve complicity or acceptance on the part of your company to actual and potential violations of human rights..."
Peace activist Rachel Corrie was killed by a Caterpillar D-9, military bulldozer in 2003. She was run over while attempting to block the destruction a family's home in Gaza. Her family filed suit against Caterpillar in March 2005 charging that Caterpillar knowingly sold machines used to violate human rights. Since Corrie's death at least three more Palestinians have been killed in their homes by Israeli bulldozer demolitions.
Chevron
The petrochemical company Chevron is guilty of some of the worst environmental and human rights abuses in the world. From 1964 to 1992, Texaco (which transferred operations to Chevron after being bought out in 2001) unleashed a toxic "Rainforest Chernobyl" in Ecuador by leaving over 600 unlined oil pits in pristine northern Amazon rainforest and dumping 18 billion gallons of toxic production water into rivers used for bathing water. Llocal communities have suffered severe health effects, including cancer, skin lesions, birth defects, and spontaneous abortions.
Chevron is also responsible for the violent repression of peaceful opposition to oil extraction. In Nigeria, Chevron has hired private military personnel to open fire on peaceful protestors who oppose oil extraction in the Niger Delta.
Additionally Chevron is responsible for widespread health problems in Richmond, California, where one of Chevron's largest refineries is located. Processing 350,000 barrels of oil a day, the Richmond refinery produces oil flares and toxic waste in the Richmond area. As a result, local residents suffer from high rates of lupus, skin rashes, rheumatic fever, liver problems, kidney problems, tumors, cancer, asthma, and eye problems.
The Unocal Corporation, which recently became a subsidiary of Chevron, is an oil and gas company based in California with operations around the world. In December 2004, the company settled a lawsuit filed by 15 Burmese villagers, in which the villagers alleged Unocal's complicity in a range of human rights violations in Burma, including rape, summary execution, torture, forced labor and forced migration.
Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola Company is perhaps the most widely recognized corporate symbol on the planet. The company also leads in the abuse of workers' rights, assassinations, water privatization, and worker discrimination. Between 1989 and 2002, eight union leaders from Coca-Cola bottling plants in Colombia were killed after protesting the company's labor practices. Hundreds of other Coca-Cola workers who have joined or considered joining the Colombian union SINALTRAINAL have been kidnapped, tortured, and detained by paramilitaries who are hired to intimidate workers to prevent them from unionizing.
In India, Coca-Cola destroys local agriculture by privatizing the country's water resources. In Plachimada, Kerala, Coca-Cola extracted 1.5 million liters of deep well water, which they bottled and sold under the names Dasani and BonAqua. The groundwater was severely depleted, affecting thousands of communities with water shortages and destroying agricultural activity. As a result, the remaining water became contaminated with high chloride and bacteria levels, leading to scabs, eye problems, and stomach aches in the local population.
Coca-Cola is also one of the most discriminatory employers in the world. In the year 2000, 2,000 African-American employees in the U.S. sued the company for race-based disparities in pay and promotions.
Dow Chemical
Dow Chemical has been destroying lives and poisoning the planet for decades. The company is best known for the ravages and health disaster for millions of Vietnamese and U.S. Veterans caused by its lethal Vietnam War defoliant, Agent Orange. Dow also developed and perfected Napalm, a brutal chemical weapon that burned many innocents to death in Vietnam and other wars. In 1988, Dow provided pesticides to Saddam Hussein despite warnings that they could be used to produce chemical weapons.
In 2001, Dow inherited the toxic legacy of the worst peacetime chemical disaster in history when it acquired Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) and its outstanding liabilities in Bhopal, India. On Dec. 3, 1984, a chemical leak from a UCC pesticide plant in Bhopal gassed thousands of people to death and left more than 150,000 disabled or dying. Dow still refuses to address its liabilities in Bhopal.
Dow Chemical's impact is felt globally from its Midland, Michigan headquarters to New Plymouth, New Zealand. In Midland, Dow has been producing chlorinated chemicals and burning and burying its waste including chemicals that make up Agent Orange. In New Plymouth, 500,000 gallons of Agent Orange were produced and thousands of tons of dioxin-laced waste was dumped in agricultural fields.
DynCorp
Private security contractors have become the fastest-growing sector of the global economy during the last decade--a $100-billion-a-year, nearly unregulated industry. DynCorp, one of the providers of these mercenary services, demonstrates the industry's power and potential to abuse human rights. While guarding Afghan statesmen and African oil fields, training Iraqi police forces, eradicating Colombian coca plants, and protecting business interests in hurricane-devastated New Orleans, these hired guns bolster the security of governments and organizations at the expense of many people's human rights.
DynCorp's fumigation of coca crops along the Colombian-Ecuadorian border led Ecuadorian peasants to sue DynCorp in 2001. Plaintiffs argued that DynCorp knew--or should have known--that the herbicides were highly toxic.
In 2001, a mechanic with DynCorp blew the whistle on DynCorp employees in Bosnia for rape and trading girls as young as 12 into sex slavery. According to a lawsuit filed by the mechanic, "employees and supervisors were engaging in perverse, illegal and inhumane behavior [and] were purchasing illegal weapons, women, [and] forged passports." DynCorp fired the whistleblower and transferred the employees accused of sex trading out of the country, eventually firing some. None were prosecuted.
Ford Motor Company
Among automakers, Ford Motor Company is the worst. Every year since 1999, the US Environmental Protection Agency has ranked Ford cars, trucks and SUVs as having the worst overall fuel economy of any American automaker. Ford's current car and truck fleet has a lower average fuel efficiency than the original Ford Model-T.
Ford is also in last place when it comes to vehicle greenhouse gas emissions. According to a recent report by the Union of Concerned Scientists, Ford has "the absolute worst heat-trapping gas emissions performance of all the Big Six automakers."
Despite the company's recent greenwashing PR campaign, its record has actually worsened. According to Ford's own sustainability report, between 2003 and 2004, the company's US fleet-wide fuel economy decreased and its CO2 emissions went up. Ford has also lobbied against lawmakers' efforts to increase fuel economy standards at the national level and is also involved in a lawsuit against California's fuel economy standards.
KBR (Kellogg, Brown and Root): A Subsidiary of Halliburton Corporation
KBR is a private company that provides military support services. Notorious for its questionable bookkeeping, dishonest billing practices with US taxpayer dollars and no-bid contracts, KBR has violated human rights on the U.S. dollar.
KBR's dubious accounting in Iraq came to light in December 2003 when Pentagon auditors questioned possible overcharges for imported gasoline. In June 2005, a previously secret Pentagon audit criticized $1.4 billion in "questioned" and "unsupported" expenditures. In 2002 the company paid $2 million to settle a Justice Department lawsuit that accused KBR of inflating contract prices at Fort Ord, California.
Many third-country national (TCN) laborers have been hired by KBR to "rebuild" Iraq. Generally hailing from impoverished Asian countries, they have unexpectedly become part of the largest civilian workforce ever hired in support of a U.S. war. Once abroad, the workers find themselves with few protections and uncertain legal status. TCNs often sleep in crowded trailers and wait outside in scorching heat for food rations. Many lack adequate medical care and put in hard labor seven days a week, 10 hours or more a day.
Lockheed Martin
Lockheed Martin is the world's largest military contractor. Providing satellites, planes, missiles and other lethal high-tech items to the Pentagon keeps the profits rolling in. Since 2000, the year Bush was elected, the company's stock value has tripled.
As the Center for Corporate Policy (www.corporatepolicy.org) notes, it is no coincidence that Lockheed VP Bruce Jackson--who helped draft the Republican foreign policy platform in 2000--is a key player at the Project for a New American Century, the intellectual incubator of the Iraq war.
Lockheed Martin is not the only defense contractor that goes behind the scenes to influence public policy, but it is one of the worst. Stephen J. Hadley, who now has Condoleeza Rice's old job as Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, was formerly a partner in a DC law firm representing Lockheed Martin. He is only one of the beneficiaries of the so-called revolving door between the military industries and the "civilian" national security apparatus. These war profiteers have a profound and illegitimate influence on our country's international policy decisions.
Monsanto
Monsanto is, by far, the largest producer of genetically engineered seeds in the world, dominating 70% to 100% of the market for crops such as soy, cotton, wheat and corn.
Monsanto is the world's leading producer of the herbicide glyphosate, marketed as Roundup. Roundup is sold to small farmers as a pesticide, yet harms crops in the long run as the toxins accumulate in the soil. Plants eventually become infertile, forcing farmers to purchase genetically modified Roundup Ready Seed, a seed that resists the herbicide. This creates a cycle of dependency on Monsanto for both the weed killer and the only seed that can resist it. Both products are patented, and sold at inflated prices. Exposure to the pesticide Roundup Ultra is documented to cause cancers, skin disorders, spontaneous abortions, premature births, and damage to the gastrointestinal and nervous systems.
According to the India Committee of the Netherlands and the International Labor Rights Fund, Monsanto also employs child labor. In India, an estimated 12,375 children work in cottonseed production for farmers paid by Indian and multinational seed companies, including Monsanto.
Nestle USA
The problem of illegal and forced child labor is rampant in the chocolate industry, because more than 40% of the world's cocoa supply comes from the Ivory Coast, a country that the US State Department estimates had approximately 109,000 child laborers working in hazardous conditions on cocoa farms. In 2001, Save the Children Canada reported that 15,000 children between 9 and 12 years old, many from impoverished Mali, had been tricked or sold into slavery on West African cocoa farms, many for just $30 each.
Nestle, the third largest buyer of cocoa from the Ivory Coast, is well aware of the tragically unjust labor practices taking place on the farms with which it continues to do business. Nestle and other chocolate manufacturers agreed to end the use of abusive and forced child labor on cocoa farms by July 1, 2005, but they failed to do so.
Nestle is also notorious for its aggressive marketing of infant formula in poor countries in the 1980s. Because of this practice, Nestle is still one of the most boycotted corporations in the world, and its infant formula is still controversial. In Italy in 2005, police seized more than two million liters of Nestle infant formula that was contaminated with the chemical isopropylthioxanthone (ITX).
Additionally, violations of labor rights are reported from Nestle factories in numerous countries. In Colombia, Nestle replaced the entire factory staff with lower-wage workers and did not renew the collective employment contract.
Philip Morris USA and Philip Morris International (a.k.a. The Altria Group Inc.)
Among tobacco companies, Philip Morris is notorious. Now called Altria, it is the world's largest and most profitable cigarette corporation and maker of Marlboro, Virginia Slims, Parliament, Basic and many other brands of cigarettes.
Documents uncovered in a lawsuit filed against the tobacco industry by the state of Minnesota showed that Philip Morris and other leading tobacco corporations knew very well of the dangers of tobacco products and the addictiveness of nicotine. To this day, Philip Morris deceives consumers about the harm of its products by offering light, mild and low-tar cigarettes that give consumers the illusion these brands are "healthier" than traditional cigarettes.
Although the company says it doesn't want kids to smoke, it spends millions of dollars every day marketing and promoting cigarettes to youth. Overseas, it has even hired underage "Marlboro girls" to distribute free cigarettes to other children and sponsored concerts where cigarettes were handed out to minors.
As anti-tobacco campaigns and government regulations are slowing tobacco use in Western countries, Philip Morris has aggressively moved into developing country markets, where smoking and smoking-related deaths are on the rise. Preliminary numbers released by the World Health Organization predict global deaths due to smoking-related illnesses will nearly double by 2020, with more than three-quarters of those deaths in the developing world.
Pfizer
Pfizer is the largest pharmaceutical company in the world; it is also one of the worst abusers of the human right of universal access to HIV/AIDS medicine.
In addition to Viagra, Zoloft, Zithromax and Norvasc, Pfizer produces the HIV/AIDS-related drugs Rescriptor, Viracept and Diflucan (fluconazole). Like other drug companies, they sell these drugs at prices poor people cannot afford and aggressively fight efforts to make it easier for generic drugs to enter the market.
Pfizer also values shareholder profits over safety standards. In Europe in 2005, it withdrew from scientific studies of a new class of AIDS drugs called CCR5 inhibitors, choosing instead to rush its own untested CCR5 inhibitor onto the European market without full information about the drug's side effects.
Suez-Lyonnaise Des Eaux (SLDE)
The privatization of water has had a disastrous impact on the human right to clean water, and the French company Suez is the worst perpetrator of this abuse. The company's billions of dollars in profit come at the expense of poor people living in countries where thousands lack access to potable water, and, because of private water contracts, are also facing skyrocketing water prices.
Suez goes by many names around the world--Ondeo, SITA and others--to mask its worldwide net of controversial activities. In Manila, Philippines, after seven years of water privatization under a Suez company (Maynilad Water) contract, studies showed that water rates increased in some neighborhoods by 400 to 700 percent. These studies also showed that the negligence of the company resulted in cholera and gastroenteritis outbreaks that killed six people and severely sickened 725 in Manila's Tondo district.
In Bolivia, a Suez company (Aguas de Illimani) left 200,000 people without access to water and caused a revolt when it tried to charge between $335 and $445 to connect a private home to the water supply. Countless people were unable to afford this charge in a country whose yearly per capita GDP is $915.
Unfortunately, the IMF and World Bank are playing a key role in pushing water privatization all over the world. Many countries have been required to open up their water supply to private companies as a condition for receiving IMF loans, and the World Bank has approved millions of dollars in loans for the privatization of water systems.
Wal-Mart
Wal-Mart is the biggest corporation in the world. It owns 5,100 stores worldwide and employs 1.3 million workers in the United States and 400,000 abroad, as well as millions more in the factories of its suppliers.
Many people have heard of the way that Wal-Mart steamrolls its way into every possible town, destroying local supermarkets and countless small businesses. We have also heard about Wal-Mart's long track record of worker abuse, from forced overtime to sex discrimination to illegal child labor to relentless union busting. Wal-Mart also notoriously fails to provide health insurance to over half of its employees, who are then left to rely on themselves or taxpayers, who provide for a portion of their healthcare needs through government Medicaid.
Less well known is the fact that Wal-Mart maintains its low price level by allowing substandard labor conditions at the overseas factories producing most of its goods. The company continually demands lower prices from its suppliers, who, in turn, make more outrageous and abusive demands on their workers in order to meet Wal-Mart's requirements.
In September 2005, the International Labor Rights Fund filed a lawsuit on behalf of Wal-Mart supplier sweatshop workers in China, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Nicaragua and Swaziland. The workers were denied minimum wages, forced to work overtime without compensation, and were denied legally mandated health care. Other worker rights violations that have been found in foreign factories that produce goods for Wal-Mart include locked bathrooms, starvation wages, pregnancy tests, denial of access to health care, and workers being fired and blacklisted if they try to defend their rights.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Presh on Dec 12, 2005 12:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheers
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Dec 12, 2005 12:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If you are not sick in your stomach & heart, you did not read this article
Posted by: basiclex
» RE: yes you are right about that
Posted by: ShaSpirit
» What can be done?
Posted by: qrswave
» RE: If you are not sick in your stomach & heart, you did not read this article
Posted by: FURonnie
» That's because INTEREST is . . .
Posted by: qrswave
» "when corporate boards and dividends became the number one priority"...
Posted by: qrswave
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ROT on Dec 12, 2005 12:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: no Sony?
Posted by: alternetjunkie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SFRosalyne on Dec 12, 2005 3:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: jlohman
» RE: Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: peaceangel
» RE: Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: jlohman
» RE: Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: incorporation limits liability of owners
Posted by: alternetleslie
» RE: incorporation limits liability of owners
Posted by: Shehova
» RE: Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: pomes
» RE: Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: jlohman
» RE: Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: clarence
» Corporate income is one of the few remaining controls on them
Posted by: sausage
» RE: Corporate income is one of the few remaining controls on them
Posted by: jlohman
» RE: Corporate income is one of the few remaining controls on them
Posted by: sausage
» RE: Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: yellow
» RE: Incorporation = Treason
Posted by: rickcreswell@yahoo.com
» RE: Incorporation = Treason
Posted by: esfisher
» RE: Incorporation = Treason
Posted by: jlohman
» RE: Incorporation = Treason
Posted by: clarence
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tcunning on Dec 12, 2005 3:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also, please visit:
www.dowethics.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yikes!
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Yikes!
Posted by: placid
» RE: Yikes! How to find Ethics of ALL businesses
Posted by: mlhbogart
» Responsible shopping...
Posted by: gregaignon
Comments are closed-
Posted by: redmaple on Dec 12, 2005 4:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ven in the Annals of Evil, It's Always All About US
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: ven in the Annals of Evil, It's Always All About US
Posted by: jpinder
» RE: Even in the Annals of Evil, It's Always All About US
Posted by: Standswithheart
» RE: Even in the Annals of Evil, It's Always All About US
Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: ven in the Annals of Evil, It's Always All About US
Posted by: starchild
» RE: ven in the Annals of Evil, It's Always All About US
Posted by: nonameonoeneeonie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Dec 12, 2005 5:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Capitalism is the reason
Posted by: Brucewxx
» A Public non-profit, interest-free monetary system
Posted by: qrswave
» RE: Capitalism is the reason
Posted by: Wildbot
» RE: Mind boggling
Posted by: pg
» RE: Mind boggling
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Songaweek on Dec 12, 2005 5:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or perhaps it's just my own bias that prompts this nomination?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» What *do* they dump into the Susquehanna river?
Posted by: ordaj
Comments are closed-
Posted by: menckenman on Dec 12, 2005 5:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The religious booboisie get their nuts off on it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» montana freeman
Posted by: trace
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Barry Stock on Dec 12, 2005 5:18 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Caterpillar?
Posted by: maxpayne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gunsoveravalon on Dec 12, 2005 6:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 12, 2005 6:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Catepillar was always a tough one to nail I thought
Posted by: Lisa_Hawthorne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Doug on Dec 12, 2005 7:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Doug
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why give a pass to the really evil abusers?
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Why give a pass to the really evil abusers?
Posted by: drmeow
» RE: Why give a pass to the really evil abusers?
Posted by: SkepticalCynic
» Why does one evil excuse another?
Posted by: Michaelmammal
» RE: Why does one evil excuse another?
Posted by: aonghus36
Comments are closed-
Posted by: threedfm on Dec 12, 2005 7:12 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: xpanding on horrific animal abuse in modern times
Posted by: bryn
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jdwilliams on Dec 12, 2005 7:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Houston construction company, Brown & Root, was a beneficiary of plenty o' pork back in the LBJ days.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Another correction
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Another correction
Posted by: croghan27
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sareena99 on Dec 12, 2005 7:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Diflucan (made by Pfizer) is an antifungal drug. Yes, many AIDS patients use it to fight their opportunistic yeast infections, but it does not affect the actual AIDS (HIV) virus at all.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The Fact WAS Straight
Posted by: AdamSelene11726
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hbw on Dec 12, 2005 7:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rickcreswell@yahoo.com on Dec 12, 2005 7:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: placid on Dec 12, 2005 8:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Maze
Posted by: pzzp
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yogistein on Dec 12, 2005 8:18 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Moreover, there is not one mention that actual people work in an organized form that we identify as corporations.
Have you ever seen a corporation? No, but every reader "represents" one--you all have the soot and pollution in you from them. We all carry a Body Burden from unregulated toxic chemicals. And none of us would have the conveniences we do have, such as cell phones, without them.
When an Us v. Them attitude is cultivated then a loss perspective ensues. Demonization of the corporation omits the fact that people just like you and me work there. I'd rather see an inclusive perspective be disseminated, like stories from those who work for the corporations. Then activists could develop methods to of changing the public's mind that would truly be effective.
Please understand that I do not support what these corporations are doing now. They have surreptitiously and underhandedly gained the power they have over the last 200 years, morphing from mere investment tools into powerful imaginary playmates that have run wild and out of control. Of course, when someone works for the corporation, the pursuit of profit changes their outlook as they pursue profit, just like the Milgram experiment of so long ago where humans hurt other humans at the behest of an authority figure.
Conscious and informed activism is what I am pushing for, here.
Jonathan Frieman
Center for Corporate Policy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Too Big to Take it All In
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Too Big to Take it All In
Posted by: A. James
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jbrags on Dec 12, 2005 8:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mo on Dec 12, 2005 9:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there is no person named "chevron" who authorized the shooting of protestors but there is a real person who organized and gave the go ahead for thier private army to murder third world citizens. WHAT ARE THEIR NAMES?
AND WHAT DO THEY LOOK LIKE? PLEASE!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: monty
Posted by: Tai Moses
» RE: monty
Posted by: flame
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pg on Dec 12, 2005 9:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Utopian Hypocrites
Posted by: secular
» RE: Utopian Hypocrites
Posted by: mom'z the word
» RE: Utopian Hypocrites
Posted by: kryptx
» Morality is not a zero sum game...
Posted by: RevRick
» RE: Morality is not a zero sum game...
Posted by: pg
» RE: Morality is not a zero sum game...
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Morality is not a zero sum game...
Posted by: Shehova
» RE: Morality is not a zero sum game...
Posted by: A. James
» RE: Morality is not a zero sum game...
Posted by: barzinho
» RE: Morality is not a zero sum game...
Posted by: pickeju
» RE: Morality is not a zero sum game...
Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Utopian Hypocrites
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mom'z the word on Dec 12, 2005 9:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Knowmad on Dec 12, 2005 10:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jsa9 on Dec 12, 2005 10:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: jsa9
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: russianblue1
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: jsa9
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: jsa9
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: Michaelmammal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: John Muir on Dec 12, 2005 10:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Further, Chevron has been spending millions to bring public attention to global warming and the need to conserve oil, while ExxonMobil, by contrast, has been spending millions funding science-abusing think tanks that look for any and all possible reasons to minimize the very real threat of global warming, as documented by Chris Mooney in an April story in "Mother Jones."
I'm not a Chevron stockholder, have no involvement with the company, and wouldn't excuse their other failings. But this judgement doesn't make sense to me, and I have to say so.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Chevron but not Exxon?
Posted by: aonghus36
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chippehogwa on Dec 12, 2005 10:56 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Could we hear a bit of good news too please?
Posted by: drmeow
» RE: Could we hear a bit of good news too please?
Posted by: chippehogwa
» RE: Could we hear a bit of good news too please?
Posted by: maxpayne
» good news found here
Posted by: Mike Turnauer, Vancouver,WA
» RE: good news found here
Posted by: chippehogwa
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ScottP on Dec 12, 2005 11:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Givhan on Dec 12, 2005 11:18 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: Justwayne
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: pg
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: Fade
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: pg
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: Fade
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: Fade
» Not the SAME liberals ... so no real kick
Posted by: AdamSelene11726
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: mlhbogart
» RE: why do you think it's called ALTernet?
Posted by: ScottP
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: kryptx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: katinmn on Dec 12, 2005 1:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
• Alliant has supplied over 16 million rounds of Depleted Uranium munitions to the DoD. Many leading scientist attribute, in part, DU munitions as a cause of the Gulf War Syndrome in American soldiers who served in the Middle East war.
• Alliant supplies all three rocket stages for the first strike submarine based Trident II (D5) nuclear missile, a weapon of mass destruction and illegal under International Law.
• Since the 1960s, ATK (Honeywell) has been suppling cluster bombs to the DoD and these were recently used in Afghanistan and Gulf War II (cluster bombs were also used in Kosovo and Gulf War I). The cluster bomb sub-munition is painted bright yellow, the same color the "aid" packages the US dropped in Afghanistan. The military claims a dud rate of 5% while some experts say it is closer to 20%. This weapon system continues to maim and kill civilans long after conflicts have ended. It is indiscriminate and thus illegal under International Law.
http://www.circlevision.org/alliantaction.html
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: AlliantTechsystems, Edina, MN, CEO Dan Murphy
Posted by: ScottP
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jnsmart on Dec 12, 2005 2:06 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every one of these Corporations were and are heavy contributors to the W. Bush campaign of dissinformation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Beeva
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: skyeblue on Dec 12, 2005 2:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bodewell on Dec 12, 2005 2:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: usingmemorytodream on Dec 12, 2005 5:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Happy on Dec 12, 2005 7:02 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Corporatism is an Attribute of Fascism
Posted by: mortarthegovernment
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bernardowissel on Dec 12, 2005 10:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Use of sugar refined from sugarcane hazardously harvested by children as young as 12. ( From Human Rights Watch --
http://www.hrw.org/children/labor/elsalvador/
Opposition to Bottle Bills ( See http://www.bottlebill.org/resources/news/news-cokepepsi.htm )
Aggressive Marketing to Children of Nutritionally Worthless and Damaging Products, Contributing to Obesity and Other Diseases. ( See http://www.commercialexploitation.org and http://www.schoolpouringrights.com/ )
Coca-Cola is intertwined through its directors with noxious companies, including Chevron-Texaco, General Electric, and Dow Chemical (current owner of Union Carbide from which victims of the Bhopal Disaster still seek justice).
Coca-Cola and leadership have been highly supportive of Bush and the Republicans.
Coke's opposition to bottle bills contributes to modern society's vast waste of plastic bottles and other consumer items in landfills rather than recycling and reusing the materials. If we did more reuse and recycling of products and wrapping materials, we would greatly decrease the use of fossil fuels and other virgin resources, diminishing the release of greenhouse gases and protecting the environment in other ways, as well as lessening dependency upon petroleum from the Middle East. In the past Coke has been highly resistant to environmental pressure to incorporate recycled materials in its bottles, and only after a multi-year campaign did the company agree to a 10% or so recycled target.
Coca-Cola's Dasani bottles are tinted blue to make the water seem alluring to consumers. Unfortunately the source of the blue tint makes the bottles difficult to recycle.
Regrettably, Hollywood allows Coca-Cola to pay for product placements in films and televisions shows, thereby encouraging people to support this dastardly company. Here is a way that actors and producers could join in solidarity with students and others campaigning against Coke.
Join with activists around the world to hold Coca-Cola accountable for its wrongs. Please visit the website www.KillerCoke.org or e-mail StopKillerCoke @ aol.com ; and also visit the websites of the other groups involved in pressuring Coca-Cola to become a better company.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vtbaron on Dec 13, 2005 6:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I raised my hand and asked about the "third column" every business must stand on -- its employees and society in general --I was reprimanded by the professor for raising a "deliberate distraction" and booed by a few of my American classmates.
This type of behavior is the norm in rah-rah, flag-waving, ill-educated, ill-mannered and thoughtless America. A very few smart members of the intelligentsia have seen fit to exploit the populace's Lemming-mentality to the form of its current zenith --the Bush administration and the willingness to rape, plunder and loot the coffers of state and bankrupt the moral credit the country once had and enjoyed around the world.
Anyone saying anything here these days against business is a pariah, an automatic outcast. After all, what's good for business must be good for America, right? Why is it that these very people, the poorest of the American poor, continue to support this administration's outright lies, corruption, hair-raising human rights and legal abuses and allow corporate America to run roughshod over their lives and accelerate the elimination of small business and the middle class? The answer is obvious: A lack of education. Since WWII, America has been on a "We're the biggest, baddest, bestest nation on Earth" binge, fueled by a complicit media and encouraged by a government rank with corruption and racketeering since Eisenhower's days.
Undoing and reeducating the people that need it most on the planet -- the Americans -- that their behavior is irresponsible, unacceptable and will not be tolerated by the rest of the global community is not something which will occur quickly or easily. It will take a powerful opposing force (such as the EU once it finally gets its act together) to cause the U.S. to reconsider some of the vilest, most detrimental and destructive practices on the planet and to reeducate its own masses that they are not going to be allowed to do with the world as they wish.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Mis-education or lack of education is a large part of
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: It's a matter of education...
Posted by: badkitty
» Rod from Canada
Posted by: Rod from Canada
Comments are closed-
Posted by: karyse on Dec 13, 2005 6:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: philosopherintraining on Dec 13, 2005 7:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Roberta_RansleyMatteau on Dec 13, 2005 7:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mrsmagoo on Dec 13, 2005 11:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jpe23 on Dec 13, 2005 11:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since the bomber is planning to die anyway, the only way to discourage this behaviour is to target their loved ones.
Hamas and other organizations pay out to the families of "martyrs," encouraging the practice, so it makes sense to counterbalance that incentive with an opposite pressure.
If families don't want their homes bulldozed, they'd best make sure none of the kids decide to become mass murderers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Caterpillar is NOT doing "evil"
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Caterpillar is NOT doing "evil"
Posted by: TreeHugger77
Comments are closed-
Posted by: davehimself on Dec 13, 2005 11:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Caterpillar , Peoria, Ill., says its dealers in the Asia Pacific region “have made equipment, personnel and other resources available to aid in recovery and cleanup efforts. At the corporate level, Caterpillar is working with its dealers to make additional equipment available to government agencies and non-governmental agencies working in the region.”
In a news release, the company noted that it knew of no casualties among Caterpillar or dealership employees or their families in the region. "
Remember the same bulldozers are used for countless acts of economic and social good, lets not let shifty "journalists" convince us they are "home crushers." I didn't see Microsoft on the list. Dont they provide the equipment that countless hackers use to destroy the lives of innocent people through identity theft.
I don't think corporations are angels, but when you twist the stories like this you lose your credibility with me.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: austinaction on Dec 13, 2005 11:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here in Austin, Texas, AMD is moving their corporate headquarters over our aquifer - to the outrage of the citizens who have worked for more than 25 years to protect the area. Over 16,000 people have signed an online petition asking AMD to reconsider the move.
Today's Austin American Stateman reports that "Advanced Micro Devices Inc. was to unveil plans with the City of Austin today for its $230 million corporate campus in Southwest Austin, a project that has stirred up controversy because the site is in the sensitive Barton Springs-Edwards Aquifer watershed... critics say the location is so wrong that it outweighs everything else that AMD is doing. The site is at the western edge of the zone where streams and rain runoff drain into the aquifer, in an area that until now has seen little major commercial development."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gorndog on Dec 13, 2005 12:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CAT Caterpillar Inc. - NYSE
CVX Chevron Corp - NYSE
CCE Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. - NYSE
DOW Dow Chemical Co. - NYSE
CSC Computer Sciences Corp. - NYSE (acquired DynCorp in 2003)
F Ford Motor Co. - NYSE
HAL Halliburton Co. - NYSE
LMT Lockheed Martin Corp. - NYSE
MON Monsanto Co. - NYSE
NESN Nestle - VX
MO Altria Group Inc. - NYSE
PFE Pfizer Inc. - NYSE
SZE Suez - NYSE
WMT Wal-Mart Stores Inc. - NYSE
Here's a Yahoo! Finance summary of them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: N/A on Dec 13, 2005 1:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suggest everyone does some real research on these topics before you start your boycots, mass emailing and protests. (Real research means go to the source for facts. Try a library instead of a web site with an anti corporate agenda, or a web site with referenced articles.)
But just to start you thinking:
Caterpillar
Please. They sold some heavey equipment to the Isreal. How that equipment is used has nothing to do with Caterpillar. Sounds like the Isreali military is the culprit, that, and people too stupid to get out of the way of a large piece of advancing machinery.
Dow Chemical
The article states "Dow still refuses to address its liabilities in Bhopal." Who makes this stuff up?!?
This tragic incident happened 16 years prior to Dow purchasing UCC. In fact, UCC settled with the Indian Supreme Court in 1989 to the tune of $470 million. This was actually $120 million more that the plaintiffs demanded. The case is considered completely settled with UCC, with the Indian government handling any remaining disputes.
More info here.
Ford Motor Company
Fun with Statistics 101.
In any list there is a first and a last. Ford is 6th of the six auto makers rated. Evil? No, just in last place. Someone has to be. There are many more auto manufacturers after this list of six, and most of them are far worse offenders than Ford.
Also, all the Big Six automakers' fuel economy decreased while CO2 emissions went up, not just Ford's. Chalk it up to higher demand for larger SUV's and trucks.
Note that Ford meets the CAFE numbers set by the NHTSA, when many import manufacturers don't.
Monsanto
Monsanto dominates because farmers like Monsanto products. Is Monsanto evil because they sell something that a user likes to buy?
People, try to think in a critical manner when you read something like this. Not everything you read on the internet is true!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Check the facts before you act.
Posted by: pianojo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dianna on Dec 13, 2005 4:31 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Ms.
Posted by: crusty
» RE: Ms.
Posted by: maxpayne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: midnightsojourner on Dec 13, 2005 7:02 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Porn for Liberals
Posted by: maxpayne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pyromaniac_guy on Dec 14, 2005 2:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: oh the irony
Posted by: tocada
» RE: oh the irony
Posted by: kryptx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kellynchi on Dec 15, 2005 10:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just a further reminder, as others have noted, that the criteria for this list focus on a particular profile of evils and do not address other forms of oppression.
Peace,
Kelly
P.S. I've about had it with HRC anyway. This is a line from the letter they asked me to send to Ford:
"Ford's current policies and trends are in line with mainstream corporate America."
What the &(*% does that mean? Especially give the atrocities on this list as well as those missing from the list.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dokijo on Dec 16, 2005 9:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Monsanto, Cargill and RFID makers are pushing NAIS legislation that will require an electronic identity chip in every chicken, cow, pig, goat or any animal that ever leaves its property for processing or other reasons. If you have even a single farm animal (food or not), you must register the GPS location of your home into a federal database at your own expense. If your animals ever leave the property, you would be required to electronically tag and register each one in addition to having your home locatable by satellite.
“you will be breaking the law for being a farmer without government permission”
see article at: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0511/S00146.htm
The government says they need this to control for bird flu. Bird flu has been around for more than 50 years. Since it has never transmitted from human to human in all that time, it is likely that it is not even possible to do so. That means that only farmers of infected birds who do not use antibacterial soap to wash their hands are at risk of catching this. Japan and many other nations control mad cow by testing cows before processing. How hard is that??? NAIS will not help.
If you are thinking this won’t effect you, it will , if you eat meat or vegetables. The punitive costs will result in most small, medium sized and organic farms being driven out of business. Processors, butchers and related businesses will follow. As central factory farms become the only option for food, if you are not a producer, your food will be dependent on fossil fuels for transport. (going up soon). Also the diversity of breeds is what keeps our food supply resilient.
If we are going to pass farm regulation, let’s have agronomists and farmers design it, not conglomerates like Cargill. They are marketing this program as free, nothing could be further from the truth.
what people can do:
• Don’t volunteer to tag or register, the NIAA is using volunteers to promote its agenda
• Contact your state veterinary office and voice your opposition
• Call your state senators and representatives and tell them you oppose NAIS.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pianojo on Dec 17, 2005 1:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But they are NOT alone. There are so MANY companies that do the same that it is mind boggling.
What to do? If we were to personally boycott each and every company there would be no way to live.
For years at a time I was a vegetarian, 3 times in all - the last as a vegan. It was impossible. Even if you were to eat only vegetable protein and wear only cotton, you still can't avoid animal products which are EVERYWHERE, even in roads and tires.
Surely, one of the things we can do is to try to get Congress to eliminate the "personhood" of corporations. But, other than this, I think the ONLY way to go on, so that one can maintain one's sanity in this totally INSANE world, is to do what you can, on an individual level and in concert with others, to stop the horrors and abuses perpetrated by corporations and governments. It's a continual uphill battle and often ends in defeat. But what else can be done? I don't know.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: adiene on Dec 17, 2005 4:02 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Besides, we created them and we keep them thriving. They were created for us and keep on existing for us. They maintain our self-indulgent lifestyle.
So, in short, to put a stop to the evil corporate agenda, we have to find ways that fix the root of the problem: our need for their services.
We live in a superficial bubble, disconnected from nature and the rest of how the world lives. The evil corporation is one of the results.
I'm not excluding myself from this mass either. I am as culpable as anyone else, but I've already dealt with my capitalist demons. . . Have you?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maximus on Dec 18, 2005 4:25 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Show Republicans your opposition to the illegitimate Bush regime.
http://www.cafepress.com/revolution09.40907793
Tell congress you don't approve of their "punish the poor" agenda.
http://www.hoflink.com/~dbaer/petitions.htm
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Veers on Dec 18, 2005 5:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Caterpillar responsible for destroying Palestinian homes? So, is Amoco responsible for fueling the Caterpillars that destroy Pestinian homes? Give me a break.
Are we really being told that Coca-Cola is killing, kidnapping, and torturing people? Yeesh.
Blaming Ford for being one of the worst corporate wrong-doers for their bad fuel ecomony is just pathetic. Getting 6 miles to the gallon and billowing smoke from your muffler is a Pento thing as much as it is with an Explorer.
All evidence on Lockheed Martin is just childish attempts at producing a conspiracy theory. There's nothing TO the charges. Yes, I understand that the company has close ties with the US government and military, but shouldn't they? They DO, after all, produce the majority of our high-tech weapondry. While I feel it is wrong for them to be as closely tied,, the information in the article is just petty.
Do the math: If 40% of the world's cocoa comes from a specific area, do you expect that the world's LARGEST chocolate company can avoid dealing with that entire region? It's silly to suggest to, because of the inhumane labor practices in a production area, a company that consumes so much of a product should completely avoid in. It's even more laughable to call the company an "evildoer" for NOT.
While I strongly agree that Phillip-Morris belongs on this list, the facts provided with such suggestions are just useless. It's plain and simple: Phillip-Morris sells a product that kills hundreds of people every day. Their business tactics have and always will be shady, and their attempts to slow the use of tabbaco are just for aesthetic value. But, if people continue to use a product, whether it is addictive or not (since there are plenty of methods around such addictions), that's their own problem, and the company isn't going anywhere until people stop using it.
Something you seem to entirely neglect in your article about Mal-Mart, just for an example: Wal-Mart's world-leading contribution to the Hurricane Katrina Relief Fund. The fact that Wal-Mart provides jobs to the unskilled,uneducated, and mentally/physically handicapped. Or that Wal-Marts are notorious for raising the population and value of a given town. Why are these things completely ignored?
Oh, I know why. You want something to complain about.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This is just silly.
Posted by: Veers
» RE: This is just silly.
Posted by: Lisa_Hawthorne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pollar on Jan 29, 2007 12:28 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dboy on Jan 29, 2007 6:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Presh on Dec 12, 2005 12:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheers
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Dec 12, 2005 12:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If you are not sick in your stomach & heart, you did not read this article
Posted by: basiclex
» RE: yes you are right about that
Posted by: ShaSpirit
» What can be done?
Posted by: qrswave
» RE: If you are not sick in your stomach & heart, you did not read this article
Posted by: FURonnie
» That's because INTEREST is . . .
Posted by: qrswave
» "when corporate boards and dividends became the number one priority"...
Posted by: qrswave
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ROT on Dec 12, 2005 12:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: no Sony?
Posted by: alternetjunkie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SFRosalyne on Dec 12, 2005 3:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: jlohman
» RE: Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: peaceangel
» RE: Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: jlohman
» RE: Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: incorporation limits liability of owners
Posted by: alternetleslie
» RE: incorporation limits liability of owners
Posted by: Shehova
» RE: Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: pomes
» RE: Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: jlohman
» RE: Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: clarence
» Corporate income is one of the few remaining controls on them
Posted by: sausage
» RE: Corporate income is one of the few remaining controls on them
Posted by: jlohman
» RE: Corporate income is one of the few remaining controls on them
Posted by: sausage
» RE: Corporations should not even be taxed
Posted by: yellow
» RE: Incorporation = Treason
Posted by: rickcreswell@yahoo.com
» RE: Incorporation = Treason
Posted by: esfisher
» RE: Incorporation = Treason
Posted by: jlohman
» RE: Incorporation = Treason
Posted by: clarence
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tcunning on Dec 12, 2005 3:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also, please visit:
www.dowethics.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yikes!
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Yikes!
Posted by: placid
» RE: Yikes! How to find Ethics of ALL businesses
Posted by: mlhbogart
» Responsible shopping...
Posted by: gregaignon
Comments are closed-
Posted by: redmaple on Dec 12, 2005 4:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ven in the Annals of Evil, It's Always All About US
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: ven in the Annals of Evil, It's Always All About US
Posted by: jpinder
» RE: Even in the Annals of Evil, It's Always All About US
Posted by: Standswithheart
» RE: Even in the Annals of Evil, It's Always All About US
Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: ven in the Annals of Evil, It's Always All About US
Posted by: starchild
» RE: ven in the Annals of Evil, It's Always All About US
Posted by: nonameonoeneeonie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Dec 12, 2005 5:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Capitalism is the reason
Posted by: Brucewxx
» A Public non-profit, interest-free monetary system
Posted by: qrswave
» RE: Capitalism is the reason
Posted by: Wildbot
» RE: Mind boggling
Posted by: pg
» RE: Mind boggling
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Songaweek on Dec 12, 2005 5:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or perhaps it's just my own bias that prompts this nomination?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» What *do* they dump into the Susquehanna river?
Posted by: ordaj
Comments are closed-
Posted by: menckenman on Dec 12, 2005 5:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The religious booboisie get their nuts off on it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» montana freeman
Posted by: trace
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Barry Stock on Dec 12, 2005 5:18 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Caterpillar?
Posted by: maxpayne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gunsoveravalon on Dec 12, 2005 6:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 12, 2005 6:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Catepillar was always a tough one to nail I thought
Posted by: Lisa_Hawthorne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Doug on Dec 12, 2005 7:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Doug
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why give a pass to the really evil abusers?
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Why give a pass to the really evil abusers?
Posted by: drmeow
» RE: Why give a pass to the really evil abusers?
Posted by: SkepticalCynic
» Why does one evil excuse another?
Posted by: Michaelmammal
» RE: Why does one evil excuse another?
Posted by: aonghus36
Comments are closed-
Posted by: threedfm on Dec 12, 2005 7:12 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: xpanding on horrific animal abuse in modern times
Posted by: bryn
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jdwilliams on Dec 12, 2005 7:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Houston construction company, Brown & Root, was a beneficiary of plenty o' pork back in the LBJ days.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Another correction
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Another correction
Posted by: croghan27
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sareena99 on Dec 12, 2005 7:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Diflucan (made by Pfizer) is an antifungal drug. Yes, many AIDS patients use it to fight their opportunistic yeast infections, but it does not affect the actual AIDS (HIV) virus at all.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The Fact WAS Straight
Posted by: AdamSelene11726
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hbw on Dec 12, 2005 7:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rickcreswell@yahoo.com on Dec 12, 2005 7:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: placid on Dec 12, 2005 8:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Maze
Posted by: pzzp
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yogistein on Dec 12, 2005 8:18 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Moreover, there is not one mention that actual people work in an organized form that we identify as corporations.
Have you ever seen a corporation? No, but every reader "represents" one--you all have the soot and pollution in you from them. We all carry a Body Burden from unregulated toxic chemicals. And none of us would have the conveniences we do have, such as cell phones, without them.
When an Us v. Them attitude is cultivated then a loss perspective ensues. Demonization of the corporation omits the fact that people just like you and me work there. I'd rather see an inclusive perspective be disseminated, like stories from those who work for the corporations. Then activists could develop methods to of changing the public's mind that would truly be effective.
Please understand that I do not support what these corporations are doing now. They have surreptitiously and underhandedly gained the power they have over the last 200 years, morphing from mere investment tools into powerful imaginary playmates that have run wild and out of control. Of course, when someone works for the corporation, the pursuit of profit changes their outlook as they pursue profit, just like the Milgram experiment of so long ago where humans hurt other humans at the behest of an authority figure.
Conscious and informed activism is what I am pushing for, here.
Jonathan Frieman
Center for Corporate Policy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Too Big to Take it All In
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Too Big to Take it All In
Posted by: A. James
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jbrags on Dec 12, 2005 8:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mo on Dec 12, 2005 9:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there is no person named "chevron" who authorized the shooting of protestors but there is a real person who organized and gave the go ahead for thier private army to murder third world citizens. WHAT ARE THEIR NAMES?
AND WHAT DO THEY LOOK LIKE? PLEASE!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: monty
Posted by: Tai Moses
» RE: monty
Posted by: flame
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pg on Dec 12, 2005 9:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Utopian Hypocrites
Posted by: secular
» RE: Utopian Hypocrites
Posted by: mom'z the word
» RE: Utopian Hypocrites
Posted by: kryptx
» Morality is not a zero sum game...
Posted by: RevRick
» RE: Morality is not a zero sum game...
Posted by: pg
» RE: Morality is not a zero sum game...
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Morality is not a zero sum game...
Posted by: Shehova
» RE: Morality is not a zero sum game...
Posted by: A. James
» RE: Morality is not a zero sum game...
Posted by: barzinho
» RE: Morality is not a zero sum game...
Posted by: pickeju
» RE: Morality is not a zero sum game...
Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Utopian Hypocrites
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mom'z the word on Dec 12, 2005 9:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Knowmad on Dec 12, 2005 10:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jsa9 on Dec 12, 2005 10:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: jsa9
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: russianblue1
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: jsa9
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: jsa9
» RE: Caterpillar-wonder why?
Posted by: Michaelmammal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: John Muir on Dec 12, 2005 10:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Further, Chevron has been spending millions to bring public attention to global warming and the need to conserve oil, while ExxonMobil, by contrast, has been spending millions funding science-abusing think tanks that look for any and all possible reasons to minimize the very real threat of global warming, as documented by Chris Mooney in an April story in "Mother Jones."
I'm not a Chevron stockholder, have no involvement with the company, and wouldn't excuse their other failings. But this judgement doesn't make sense to me, and I have to say so.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Chevron but not Exxon?
Posted by: aonghus36
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chippehogwa on Dec 12, 2005 10:56 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Could we hear a bit of good news too please?
Posted by: drmeow
» RE: Could we hear a bit of good news too please?
Posted by: chippehogwa
» RE: Could we hear a bit of good news too please?
Posted by: maxpayne
» good news found here
Posted by: Mike Turnauer, Vancouver,WA
» RE: good news found here
Posted by: chippehogwa
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ScottP on Dec 12, 2005 11:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Givhan on Dec 12, 2005 11:18 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: Justwayne
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: pg
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: Fade
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: pg
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: Fade
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: Fade
» Not the SAME liberals ... so no real kick
Posted by: AdamSelene11726
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: mlhbogart
» RE: why do you think it's called ALTernet?
Posted by: ScottP
» RE: Incredible
Posted by: kryptx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: katinmn on Dec 12, 2005 1:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
• Alliant has supplied over 16 million rounds of Depleted Uranium munitions to the DoD. Many leading scientist attribute, in part, DU munitions as a cause of the Gulf War Syndrome in American soldiers who served in the Middle East war.
• Alliant supplies all three rocket stages for the first strike submarine based Trident II (D5) nuclear missile, a weapon of mass destruction and illegal under International Law.
• Since the 1960s, ATK (Honeywell) has been suppling cluster bombs to the DoD and these were recently used in Afghanistan and Gulf War II (cluster bombs were also used in Kosovo and Gulf War I). The cluster bomb sub-munition is painted bright yellow, the same color the "aid" packages the US dropped in Afghanistan. The military claims a dud rate of 5% while some experts say it is closer to 20%. This weapon system continues to maim and kill civilans long after conflicts have ended. It is indiscriminate and thus illegal under International Law.
http://www.circlevision.org/alliantaction.html
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: AlliantTechsystems, Edina, MN, CEO Dan Murphy
Posted by: ScottP
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jnsmart on Dec 12, 2005 2:06 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every one of these Corporations were and are heavy contributors to the W. Bush campaign of dissinformation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Beeva
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: skyeblue on Dec 12, 2005 2:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bodewell on Dec 12, 2005 2:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: usingmemorytodream on Dec 12, 2005 5:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Happy on Dec 12, 2005 7:02 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Corporatism is an Attribute of Fascism
Posted by: mortarthegovernment
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bernardowissel on Dec 12, 2005 10:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Use of sugar refined from sugarcane hazardously harvested by children as young as 12. ( From Human Rights Watch --
http://www.hrw.org/children/labor/elsalvador/
Opposition to Bottle Bills ( See http://www.bottlebill.org/resources/news/news-cokepepsi.htm )
Aggressive Marketing to Children of Nutritionally Worthless and Damaging Products, Contributing to Obesity and Other Diseases. ( See http://www.commercialexploitation.org and http://www.schoolpouringrights.com/ )
Coca-Cola is intertwined through its directors with noxious companies, including Chevron-Texaco, General Electric, and Dow Chemical (current owner of Union Carbide from which victims of the Bhopal Disaster still seek justice).
Coca-Cola and leadership have been highly supportive of Bush and the Republicans.
Coke's opposition to bottle bills contributes to modern society's vast waste of plastic bottles and other consumer items in landfills rather than recycling and reusing the materials. If we did more reuse and recycling of products and wrapping materials, we would greatly decrease the use of fossil fuels and other virgin resources, diminishing the release of greenhouse gases and protecting the environment in other ways, as well as lessening dependency upon petroleum from the Middle East. In the past Coke has been highly resistant to environmental pressure to incorporate recycled materials in its bottles, and only after a multi-year campaign did the company agree to a 10% or so recycled target.
Coca-Cola's Dasani bottles are tinted blue to make the water seem alluring to consumers. Unfortunately the source of the blue tint makes the bottles difficult to recycle.
Regrettably, Hollywood allows Coca-Cola to pay for product placements in films and televisions shows, thereby encouraging people to support this dastardly company. Here is a way that actors and producers could join in solidarity with students and others campaigning against Coke.
Join with activists around the world to hold Coca-Cola accountable for its wrongs. Please visit the website www.KillerCoke.org or e-mail StopKillerCoke @ aol.com ; and also visit the websites of the other groups involved in pressuring Coca-Cola to become a better company.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vtbaron on Dec 13, 2005 6:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I raised my hand and asked about the "third column" every business must stand on -- its employees and society in general --I was reprimanded by the professor for raising a "deliberate distraction" and booed by a few of my American classmates.
This type of behavior is the norm in rah-rah, flag-waving, ill-educated, ill-mannered and thoughtless America. A very few smart members of the intelligentsia have seen fit to exploit the populace's Lemming-mentality to the form of its current zenith --the Bush administration and the willingness to rape, plunder and loot the coffers of state and bankrupt the moral credit the country once had and enjoyed around the world.
Anyone saying anything here these days against business is a pariah, an automatic outcast. After all, what's good for business must be good for America, right? Why is it that these very people, the poorest of the American poor, continue to support this administration's outright lies, corruption, hair-raising human rights and legal abuses and allow corporate America to run roughshod over their lives and accelerate the elimination of small business and the middle class? The answer is obvious: A lack of education. Since WWII, America has been on a "We're the biggest, baddest, bestest nation on Earth" binge, fueled by a complicit media and encouraged by a government rank with corruption and racketeering since Eisenhower's days.
Undoing and reeducating the people that need it most on the planet -- the Americans -- that their behavior is irresponsible, unacceptable and will not be tolerated by the rest of the global community is not something which will occur quickly or easily. It will take a powerful opposing force (such as the EU once it finally gets its act together) to cause the U.S. to reconsider some of the vilest, most detrimental and destructive practices on the planet and to reeducate its own masses that they are not going to be allowed to do with the world as they wish.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Mis-education or lack of education is a large part of
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: It's a matter of education...
Posted by: badkitty
» Rod from Canada
Posted by: Rod from Canada
Comments are closed-
Posted by: karyse on Dec 13, 2005 6:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: philosopherintraining on Dec 13, 2005 7:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Roberta_RansleyMatteau on Dec 13, 2005 7:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mrsmagoo on Dec 13, 2005 11:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jpe23 on Dec 13, 2005 11:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since the bomber is planning to die anyway, the only way to discourage this behaviour is to target their loved ones.
Hamas and other organizations pay out to the families of "martyrs," encouraging the practice, so it makes sense to counterbalance that incentive with an opposite pressure.
If families don't want their homes bulldozed, they'd best make sure none of the kids decide to become mass murderers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Caterpillar is NOT doing "evil"
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Caterpillar is NOT doing "evil"
Posted by: TreeHugger77
Comments are closed-
Posted by: davehimself on Dec 13, 2005 11:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Caterpillar , Peoria, Ill., says its dealers in the Asia Pacific region “have made equipment, personnel and other resources available to aid in recovery and cleanup efforts. At the corporate level, Caterpillar is working with its dealers to make additional equipment available to government agencies and non-governmental agencies working in the region.”
In a news release, the company noted that it knew of no casualties among Caterpillar or dealership employees or their families in the region. "
Remember the same bulldozers are used for countless acts of economic and social good, lets not let shifty "journalists" convince us they are "home crushers." I didn't see Microsoft on the list. Dont they provide the equipment that countless hackers use to destroy the lives of innocent people through identity theft.
I don't think corporations are angels, but when you twist the stories like this you lose your credibility with me.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: austinaction on Dec 13, 2005 11:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here in Austin, Texas, AMD is moving their corporate headquarters over our aquifer - to the outrage of the citizens who have worked for more than 25 years to protect the area. Over 16,000 people have signed an online petition asking AMD to reconsider the move.
Today's Austin American Stateman reports that "Advanced Micro Devices Inc. was to unveil plans with the City of Austin today for its $230 million corporate campus in Southwest Austin, a project that has stirred up controversy because the site is in the sensitive Barton Springs-Edwards Aquifer watershed... critics say the location is so wrong that it outweighs everything else that AMD is doing. The site is at the western edge of the zone where streams and rain runoff drain into the aquifer, in an area that until now has seen little major commercial development."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gorndog on Dec 13, 2005 12:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CAT Caterpillar Inc. - NYSE
CVX Chevron Corp - NYSE
CCE Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. - NYSE
DOW Dow Chemical Co. - NYSE
CSC Computer Sciences Corp. - NYSE (acquired DynCorp in 2003)
F Ford Motor Co. - NYSE
HAL Halliburton Co. - NYSE
LMT Lockheed Martin Corp. - NYSE
MON Monsanto Co. - NYSE
NESN Nestle - VX
MO Altria Group Inc. - NYSE
PFE Pfizer Inc. - NYSE
SZE Suez - NYSE
WMT Wal-Mart Stores Inc. - NYSE
Here's a Yahoo! Finance summary of them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: N/A on Dec 13, 2005 1:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suggest everyone does some real research on these topics before you start your boycots, mass emailing and protests. (Real research means go to the source for facts. Try a library instead of a web site with an anti corporate agenda, or a web site with referenced articles.)
But just to start you thinking:
Caterpillar
Please. They sold some heavey equipment to the Isreal. How that equipment is used has nothing to do with Caterpillar. Sounds like the Isreali military is the culprit, that, and people too stupid to get out of the way of a large piece of advancing machinery.
Dow Chemical
The article states "Dow still refuses to address its liabilities in Bhopal." Who makes this stuff up?!?
This tragic incident happened 16 years prior to Dow purchasing UCC. In fact, UCC settled with the Indian Supreme Court in 1989 to the tune of $470 million. This was actually $120 million more that the plaintiffs demanded. The case is considered completely settled with UCC, with the Indian government handling any remaining disputes.
More info here.
Ford Motor Company
Fun with Statistics 101.
In any list there is a first and a last. Ford is 6th of the six auto makers rated. Evil? No, just in last place. Someone has to be. There are many more auto manufacturers after this list of six, and most of them are far worse offenders than Ford.
Also, all the Big Six automakers' fuel economy decreased while CO2 emissions went up, not just Ford's. Chalk it up to higher demand for larger SUV's and trucks.
Note that Ford meets the CAFE numbers set by the NHTSA, when many import manufacturers don't.
Monsanto
Monsanto dominates because farmers like Monsanto products. Is Monsanto evil because they sell something that a user likes to buy?
People, try to think in a critical manner when you read something like this. Not everything you read on the internet is true!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Check the facts before you act.
Posted by: pianojo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dianna on Dec 13, 2005 4:31 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Ms.
Posted by: crusty
» RE: Ms.
Posted by: maxpayne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: midnightsojourner on Dec 13, 2005 7:02 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Porn for Liberals
Posted by: maxpayne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pyromaniac_guy on Dec 14, 2005 2:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: oh the irony
Posted by: tocada
» RE: oh the irony
Posted by: kryptx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kellynchi on Dec 15, 2005 10:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just a further reminder, as others have noted, that the criteria for this list focus on a particular profile of evils and do not address other forms of oppression.
Peace,
Kelly
P.S. I've about had it with HRC anyway. This is a line from the letter they asked me to send to Ford:
"Ford's current policies and trends are in line with mainstream corporate America."
What the &(*% does that mean? Especially give the atrocities on this list as well as those missing from the list.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dokijo on Dec 16, 2005 9:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Monsanto, Cargill and RFID makers are pushing NAIS legislation that will require an electronic identity chip in every chicken, cow, pig, goat or any animal that ever leaves its property for processing or other reasons. If you have even a single farm animal (food or not), you must register the GPS location of your home into a federal database at your own expense. If your animals ever leave the property, you would be required to electronically tag and register each one in addition to having your home locatable by satellite.
“you will be breaking the law for being a farmer without government permission”
see article at: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0511/S00146.htm
The government says they need this to control for bird flu. Bird flu has been around for more than 50 years. Since it has never transmitted from human to human in all that time, it is likely that it is not even possible to do so. That means that only farmers of infected birds who do not use antibacterial soap to wash their hands are at risk of catching this. Japan and many other nations control mad cow by testing cows before processing. How hard is that??? NAIS will not help.
If you are thinking this won’t effect you, it will , if you eat meat or vegetables. The punitive costs will result in most small, medium sized and organic farms being driven out of business. Processors, butchers and related businesses will follow. As central factory farms become the only option for food, if you are not a producer, your food will be dependent on fossil fuels for transport. (going up soon). Also the diversity of breeds is what keeps our food supply resilient.
If we are going to pass farm regulation, let’s have agronomists and farmers design it, not conglomerates like Cargill. They are marketing this program as free, nothing could be further from the truth.
what people can do:
• Don’t volunteer to tag or register, the NIAA is using volunteers to promote its agenda
• Contact your state veterinary office and voice your opposition
• Call your state senators and representatives and tell them you oppose NAIS.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pianojo on Dec 17, 2005 1:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But they are NOT alone. There are so MANY companies that do the same that it is mind boggling.
What to do? If we were to personally boycott each and every company there would be no way to live.
For years at a time I was a vegetarian, 3 times in all - the last as a vegan. It was impossible. Even if you were to eat only vegetable protein and wear only cotton, you still can't avoid animal products which are EVERYWHERE, even in roads and tires.
Surely, one of the things we can do is to try to get Congress to eliminate the "personhood" of corporations. But, other than this, I think the ONLY way to go on, so that one can maintain one's sanity in this totally INSANE world, is to do what you can, on an individual level and in concert with others, to stop the horrors and abuses perpetrated by corporations and governments. It's a continual uphill battle and often ends in defeat. But what else can be done? I don't know.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: adiene on Dec 17, 2005 4:02 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Besides, we created them and we keep them thriving. They were created for us and keep on existing for us. They maintain our self-indulgent lifestyle.
So, in short, to put a stop to the evil corporate agenda, we have to find ways that fix the root of the problem: our need for their services.
We live in a superficial bubble, disconnected from nature and the rest of how the world lives. The evil corporation is one of the results.
I'm not excluding myself from this mass either. I am as culpable as anyone else, but I've already dealt with my capitalist demons. . . Have you?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maximus on Dec 18, 2005 4:25 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Show Republicans your opposition to the illegitimate Bush regime.
http://www.cafepress.com/revolution09.40907793
Tell congress you don't approve of their "punish the poor" agenda.
http://www.hoflink.com/~dbaer/petitions.htm
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Veers on Dec 18, 2005 5:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Caterpillar responsible for destroying Palestinian homes? So, is Amoco responsible for fueling the Caterpillars that destroy Pestinian homes? Give me a break.
Are we really being told that Coca-Cola is killing, kidnapping, and torturing people? Yeesh.
Blaming Ford for being one of the worst corporate wrong-doers for their bad fuel ecomony is just pathetic. Getting 6 miles to the gallon and billowing smoke from your muffler is a Pento thing as much as it is with an Explorer.
All evidence on Lockheed Martin is just childish attempts at producing a conspiracy theory. There's nothing TO the charges. Yes, I understand that the company has close ties with the US government and military, but shouldn't they? They DO, after all, produce the majority of our high-tech weapondry. While I feel it is wrong for them to be as closely tied,, the information in the article is just petty.
Do the math: If 40% of the world's cocoa comes from a specific area, do you expect that the world's LARGEST chocolate company can avoid dealing with that entire region? It's silly to suggest to, because of the inhumane labor practices in a production area, a company that consumes so much of a product should completely avoid in. It's even more laughable to call the company an "evildoer" for NOT.
While I strongly agree that Phillip-Morris belongs on this list, the facts provided with such suggestions are just useless. It's plain and simple: Phillip-Morris sells a product that kills hundreds of people every day. Their business tactics have and always will be shady, and their attempts to slow the use of tabbaco are just for aesthetic value. But, if people continue to use a product, whether it is addictive or not (since there are plenty of methods around such addictions), that's their own problem, and the company isn't going anywhere until people stop using it.
Something you seem to entirely neglect in your article about Mal-Mart, just for an example: Wal-Mart's world-leading contribution to the Hurricane Katrina Relief Fund. The fact that Wal-Mart provides jobs to the unskilled,uneducated, and mentally/physically handicapped. Or that Wal-Marts are notorious for raising the population and value of a given town. Why are these things completely ignored?
Oh, I know why. You want something to complain about.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This is just silly.
Posted by: Veers
» RE: This is just silly.
Posted by: Lisa_Hawthorne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pollar on Jan 29, 2007 12:28 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dboy on Jan 29, 2007 6:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




