Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Excerpt: The Fog That Cloaks Hypocrisy

By Larry Beinhart, AlterNet. Posted December 13, 2005.


Like Bush's dreams of democracy in Iraq, most of the worst lies in our society find their source in colossal delusion.
fogfactscoversmall
Fog Facts cover
Advertisement

One often hears that someone represents a "real Horatio Alger Story." Horatio Alger was a master of the dime novel in the mid-19th century. He churned out dozens of almost identical storylines: a young, poverty-stricken churl is alone in the big, cold city. He works harder than the other shoe-shine or news boys and puts every cent away, while the other boys gamble and drink and waste their money on trivial goods. Along comes a wealthy businessman. He takes note of the young lad's ethic -- and the sparkle of intelligence in his crusty eye -- and takes him under his wing. Soon the boy is a wealthy man of responsibility and high station.

Embedded in Horatio Alger's work is the Protestant work ethic, the pull-yourself-up-by-the-bootstraps American creed. The mythology of upward mobility in America is central to modern conservative thinking, and much of it can be credited to Horatio Alger and his adoring fans. But who was he?

In this excerpt from "Fog Facts", author Larry Beinhart does some digging, and what he finds would come as a surprise to many a conservative Alger fan:

Horatio Alger (1834-1899) wrote about 130 short novels. Like the Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew, which I read at the same age, they are all the same, yet all quite readable. Alger had a great gift for narrative. For some reason or other, I happened to pick one up as an adult. I was quite surprised at what I was reading. Then I read several more to see if that was an aberration. No, that part of my memory, at least, was correct; they are all exactly the same.

They feature a boy just at, or on the verge of, puberty, from the country or the slums. He comes to the center of the big city. He does work, but he doesn't work astonishingly hard, certainly not as compared to the majority of other working children in the days of legal child labor. He doesn't start his own business or invent a better mousetrap or find the Northwest Passage.

What really happens is he meets a rich older man who takes quite a fancy to him and sets him up with money and educates him and teaches him how to dress and conduct himself. There is, indeed, a "meet cute" in which the boy does something that draws that nice rich man's attention. It's usually something heroic, like stopping a team of galloping horses that's dragging a coach that is carrying the rich man's daughter.

This action is referred to in the books themselves and by people like those at the Horatio Alger Society as a sign of character. It is also a chance for the older man to notice how this boy stands out from the other boys. He has that forthright, noble-boy quality. Which is very, very attractive. Eager, earnest, shining. It's what draws priests to alter boys. In addition to the convenience, of course.

I do not understand how an adult can read Alger's stories and not realize that these were homosexual pedophile fantasies. Actually, it's a single fantasy repeated over and over again.

So I looked him up. And there it was. He had started out as a minister in Brewster, Massachusetts. He was having sex with boys in his congregation. Two of them told their parents. He admitted to a certain "practice." He resigned and moved to New York City. There he became a writer and began churning out these fantasies as dime novels.

We have two distinct ideas of what happened when he went to New York. Jessica Amanda Salmonson, a critic, antiquarian bookseller, and gay activist, has written: "Alger continued his 'practice' although thereafter most often against types of boys nobody cared about, thus avoiding further trouble with authorities. The newsboys Alger glamorized in his fiction were in reality homeless child laborers who spent their nights in alleys or slum-squats .... Their plight included sexual exploitation ranging from outright rape to 'willing' prostitution."


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Brilliant, one mistake
Posted by: citizenjoe on Dec 13, 2005 2:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Larry is awesome. His error in this article is his statement that these hypocrites and self-deceivers are not liars. They are liars and self-deceivers. These people are, as we say today, "in denial". This is not psychosis; these people perceive reality quite clearly and then deny what they see quite precisely. They lie to themselves and to others; this is twice as much lying as ordinary liars do. Larry should not deny they lie; they do! Horatio Alger did it; Bush and the entire "Machiavellian" retinue: Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld,Perle,Rove, Rice, etc., do it on a grand scale. They follow the rules laid out by Joseph Goebbels. The Nazis were not crazy either. What Bush & Co. and the Nazis have in common is a dedication to authoritarian national supremacy. The correct name in politics for what that phrase describes is Fascism. Call a spade a spade: they are not merely hypocrites and immoral; they practice "the big lie" and they are fascists. I am sure many of them know this perfectly well! So should we. This is not a joking matter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» BRILLIANT, JOE!, but... Posted by: qrswave
The Dead
Posted by: Tom Degan on Dec 13, 2005 2:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You want to talk about lies? Consider this: When ever I've seen a photo of the grave of a soldier an Arlington National Cemetary who has lost his or her life in this atrocity, the tombstone bears the name, rank, date of birth, date of death and, underneath that, the name of the conflict. Operation Iraqi "Freedom"?? Here's a nasty little fact that in the years ahead will become slightly problematic for the government. When it becomes obvious to all that this war was a lie based not on freedom but arrogance, greed and stupidity, the survivors of those kids (or a heck of alot of them, anyway) are going to demand that those stones be replaced. Operation Iraqi Freedom? No, thankyou. Why would anyone in their right mind want a bald faced lie placed on their final resting place for all time and eternity? How 'bout: Died For A Lie? That's much more like it. Operation Neo-Con Madness? Better still! The parents, brothers and sisters of those poor kids will wince at the sight of so obvious a lie on the tombstone of their loved ones.

Freedom? Bullshit. This wasn't about freedom or WMDs. It was about oil. It was about post-invasion contracts. And if the hideous bastards in the Oval Office could loot our national treasure in the process, so much the better.

Mission accomplished.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Dead Posted by: Barbara
» RE: The Dead Posted by: Sandra
» RE: The Dead Posted by: errandchild
» The Only Worthy Honor Posted by: cyclone
» RE: The Dead Posted by: jwg
» RE: The Dead Posted by: Barbara
» RE: The Dead Posted by: GeraldM
An old story
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Dec 13, 2005 5:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This reminds me of the old story about the great actor who was asked by an aspiring young actor, "Would you give me some advice to help me in my career?". With deep conviction the old actor replied, "Sincerity is the key. Once you can fake that you've got it made".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the fog of faith
Posted by: menckenman on Dec 13, 2005 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who tells you they talk to god and he told them His son died for Adam's sin of eating an apple is a liar, a charlatan, and their followers are idiots. You'd have thought enough Americans would have received a good enough education to prefer reason over superstition, but it appears now that down south, across the Bible belt, and anon across the country old beliefs die hard, and the devil is on the loose.

80% of America calls themselves religious or spiritual, and the presidency is the pulpit calling all good Christians to rally around the flag and cross. Its always worked, it will never stop working until we frankly acknowledge that politicians use God to demonize unbelievers and make war in order to keep unlimited and unquestioned power and the poor of the world inherit the wind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the fog of faith Posted by: jwg
» RE: the fog of faith Posted by: trace
Too bad he didn't take this a little further. Bush and Algier ......
Posted by: Pepper on Dec 13, 2005 6:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.....may have had more in common than just politics and hypocracy, maybe even pedophilia. If you delve into the dark world of Satanic worship, you will find that sexual abuse of small children is how they control them later in life and that may well have been what happened to GW. I don't know, its just speculation, but all this information regarding his dad and those around him and GW would lead you to deduce some connections here. Check all this out.

http://www.thelawparty.org/FranklinCoverup/wtpage1small.gif

http://www.thelawparty.org/FranklinCoverup/franklin.htm

http://www.rense.com/general61/appallingconspiracyof.htm

http://sandiego.indymedia.org/en/2003/03/4516.shtml


http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/34697.htm

This next two you will have to cut and paste since this site doesn't allow links longer than 40 letters.

http://www.onlinejournal.com/Media/021805Madsen/

021805madsen.html

http://www.newyorker.com/printables

/talk/051107ta_talk_collins

This next link is a pic of the Ambassador to Poland who was sent there in 2004 to get him out of the White House according to Kitty Kelly's book to keep the public from finding out about GW and him as "friends" from childhood. You can go where you want with this one.

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/34697.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The present bunch
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Dec 13, 2005 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most people hate the present administration and believe that when we get rid of them things willl be fine. I don't share this view. I think that the system has to be replaced. Even the most ardent Democrat knows and bewails the fact that the Democratic Party is "Republican Light". The evil is not that both parties are alike but that both parties represent the establishment, the rich corporate elite. There would be no problem if both parties were alike and represented the people. I think that we the people have to tell both parties where we stand on issues that are important to us. And that we won't support their party if it doesn't support our view. We are subject to the same tyrrany that our founding fathers fought a revolution against, "Taxation without representation". Click on do it now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I don't get it.
Posted by: briefer on Dec 13, 2005 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, let me get this straight. We've got it pretty nailed down here that Horatio Alger molested kids while he was a minister. We also know that he went on to say he was reformed and lived the rest of his life to help a lot of other kids.

We then make the leap that he continued his predatory ways in later life (because we all know that that's just how "those people" are) and that this must mean that all of his later goodness was just pretense.

And we do all this in an article pointing out someone else's hypocrisy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Try thinking clearly Posted by: citizenjoe
» RE: Try thinking clearly Posted by: briefer
» RE: think again Posted by: citizenjoe
» RE: think again Posted by: JoshuaHolland
» good point, not THE point Posted by: citizenjoe
» briefer may be pedophile Posted by: monkopotamus
» RE: briefer may be pedophile Posted by: briefer
Children have a right to grow up unmolested by adults.
Posted by: Sojourner on Dec 13, 2005 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And if Alger wrote stories to sublimate his desires, more power to him.

The hypocrisy here is a journalist preaching truth-telling.
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. I expect to hear from Beinhart next that gossip should be eliminated from the news. Why not, maybe someone will print the story with his byline. Or maybe his next story will be about gluttony?

Try to find honest work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sojourner is stupid hypocrite Posted by: monkopotamus
Another "Booga-Booga" Moment For the Great American Myth.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Dec 13, 2005 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Horatio Alger, upon whose stories nearly the entire American Myth of "raising-one's-self-by-one's-own-bootstraps" is based, was a PEDOPHILE?! Oh, that's rich. . .

Also note: "raising one's self by one's own bootstraps" is a physical impossibility – a small point of logic conveniently ignored by promoters of self-serving fantasies, but one that's becoming abundantly clear with the impoverishing of the middle class and the scandals (Enron, Global Crossing, our government...) surrounding how the Captains of Indusrty & Democracy REALLY make their millions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Satanic abuse is right-wing Christian scare-tactic mythology
Posted by: esactun on Dec 13, 2005 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and you're drinking the Kool-Aid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

redemption
Posted by: brucem on Dec 13, 2005 11:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a great piece and I am going to get the book. I have a different take on this particular subject, though. Even if delusional, Horation Alger was allowed by society to recover from actions we consider essentially unforgiveable. Today, in this "Christian" nation, we throw people away once they have crosssed certain sin lines, though mass killings (war) and vast theft (corporate fraud) don't seem to count. We declare them forever evil, shun them, put them to death, regardless of their efforts to give back or use their error to teach better ways (see Tookie Williams). We deny them the very mercy denied Jesus the Christ by an angry mob, another great Christian hypocrisy.

Not that we should condone unreconstructed pedophiles or other violators. But we will never rise from this fog of delusion and its embedded subconcious deceptions until we can view all error as correctible; until we can admit we have sinned, are not perfect, will sin again and again, and yet remain valuable, worthy beings capable of making a contribution to humanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: redemption or ANTI-CHRIST Posted by: jeffrey7
Vietnam was a delusion too
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Dec 13, 2005 3:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This whole system is under a delusion,the delusion of being supported by the masses. Nothing could be further from the truth. We were told during vietnam that we were killing 'communist aggressors'. The folks we were killing lived in shacks ate rice and snakes and thought an Elephant in the village was the best thing in the world. Bush as a pilot was a bigger threat. Then there was the 'oughtness' of Desert Storm
The Iraqi Army was a 4th rate force not by their military expertice but by their numbers. If they were truly that good,
we would have been there all this time and it would've ended like Korea. The borders stayed the same,just a lot of dead folks.
We live under a system of Tyrants. Bush,Cheney,Rummie and the lot are merely the faces put up by the folks that really run things but can't or won't show their faces. Why?
Because they don't want to get shot!! They know it's far safer to throw down some cash to the system and get what they want by supporting BOTH Parties. The media just covers their tracks,creates their spin,and promotes the propaganda. They print stories that are staged and paid for to spread the lies.
There was a name for this kind of Govt. It's fallen out of use over the past few decades.Mainly because 'intelectuals' felt it was over-used and meaningless. The word is FACSISM. I may even have misspelled it it's been so long. But the truth is the same,misspelled or not. This system is corrupt and needs to be removed. It's time we put People Over Tyrants.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fascism it is! Posted by: citizenjoe
We need to let the sun shine on the subject
Posted by: reason on Dec 14, 2005 4:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To accuse someone of being a pedophile because they discuss it on here, is to close a subject that needs a lot more sunlight.

You have more faith in the studies of pedophiles than I do. Some say they can be cured. "100% recidivism" has became a mantra .

The truth is, the whole thing is sadistic, starting with Megan's law. Parents think Megan's law protects them. It doesn't. There may be a pedophile next door that hasn't been caught. There may be one in your family.

The whole family of a pedophile is punished by having their son, brother or husband published on the internet. Their children are taunted.

I started noticing this after someone I know was falsely accused. He was found not guilty. Would I leave my children with him? No, but I wouldn't have before the accusation either. It isn't smart.

So what if there is no pedophile listed in your area? They can drive.

Tracking should be used and people should be notified if one is living in their town. (that would probably cover most towns) but the names should not be on the internet, because it punishes the family.

We need educational awareness that we should be as vigilant with our children at all times even if we haven't a pedophile in the neighborhood.

If you think about it, it is another mass hysteria thing that doesn't solve a problem. It gives a false sense of security that parents should not have.
continued..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Continued
Posted by: reason on Dec 14, 2005 4:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dr. Spock always said to keep your children away from teenage boys and old men because both may do things, they wouldn't ordinarily do, at that stage of their life. Don't tempt the devil.

I have hated and despised the pedophiles in the news. But most pedophiles are normal, except for their compulsion for children and can contribute to society. Some can control their compulsion if they stay away from drugs, alcohol and pornography. Some pray daily to control their compulsion.

Tracking devices and family awareness is necessary. They shouldn't be allowed to marry someone with children.

What was done to the pedophile priest that went to prison was sadistic and a result of the hatred that is being fed to society. He may have brought many prisoners to the Lord if his face had not been broadcasted on TV. Instead he was stomped to death.

There are many things children can do if they are being abducted. If on a bicycle, they can wrap their legs around the bike, which will prevent the being able to toss them in their car. They can scream and kick. The girl abducted at the car wash may have gotten away if she had started screaming and kicking.

For us to be the most advanced country in the world, we are really dumb about pedophiles and Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Would you clarify that, please?
Posted by: reason on Dec 14, 2005 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right wing fundamentalism offers "confessional" redemption to right wing criminals, moral degenerates, murders, etc. and sends them on to authority positions so they can continue to be criminals, murders, and swine. That gave us the recycled Bush, Gordon Libby, Charles Colson, etc. This is a national and a political problem of great importance at present.

What is "right wing fundamentalism?

How did they give us Bush?

I have heard it is the older white male that gave us Bush. Also, a few diebold machines here and there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I'll try. Posted by: citizenjoe
Piercing the Fog
Posted by: Stonecutter on Dec 14, 2005 3:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Larry Beinhart has brilliantly identified the unscratchable itch these parasites have infected us with since Dubya was injected into our bloodstream back in 2000. This isn't just any old itch...it's the kind of corrosive infection that can have you figuratively "tearing the skin off your body".

Hypocrisy and mendacity literally bleed from every orifice of this president's pronouncements, and those of his minions. I can't even listen to them anymore...no matter what they're actually saying, it all looks and sounds like Terry Gilliam's "Brazil". A speech by the president is merely an opportunity for comedy or derision, preferably both, offered up by a master of comic deconstruction---Bill Maher or Lewis Black or Jon Stewart---peeling back the onion of hypocrisy that saturates his rhetoric, and through "logic, proof or evidence" demonstrating the transparent manipulation and lies just beneath the surface.

This gives a measure of relief, like spraying the itch with zilocaine, but it's only topical and doesn't last very long. Only surgery will work in the long run. Cut out this infection and the itching will disappear. The operation is scheduled for Nov, 2006.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]