Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A Different Kind of Family Reunion

By Cynthia Fuchs, PopMatters. Posted December 6, 2005.


Instead of breaking new ground, the film 'Transamerica' settles for the tired, old version of the 'alternative family.'
transamerica-2005
Transamerica
Advertisement

"This is the voice," says Bree (played by Felicity Huffman), practicing her woman's pitch.

As if to do battle with the world, she prepares carefully before heading out the door, ensuring that her body is properly contained, her nails appropriately pink, her lipstick perfectly blushy. If she's not precisely the image on her Glamour magazine, she's as close as most mortal women might be. Bree means to make the case to her therapist Margaret (Elizabeth Pena), that she's ready for surgery: her year in transition is nearly done, her hormones are aligned, and it's time. "This is the voice."

Or maybe not. Sitting in Margaret's office at the start of Transamerica, Bree admits in a gush that well, she's had a phone call raising the wee problem of the son she fathered when she was "Stanley," and much as she wants to put that self behind her, Margaret insists that she integrate. "Stanley's life is your life," she smiles, soothing. "This is a part of your body that cannot be discarded."

This is the sort of language that makes gender so perplexing, and so rigid at the same time. What does it have to do with bodies, lives and names? How can it determine who you are, or at least how others see you, which amounts to much the same thing if you're inclined to want approval or feel desired or even just to get along. And so Bree must face that past she thought was over, in the form of a 17-year-old Calvin Klein-model-boy named Toby (Kevin Zegers). She heads to NYC to bail him out of "downtown lockup," where he's residing since he tried to shoplift a frog. Yes, the child is looking for help, and Bree pretends to be a Christian missionary, doing good work under the auspices of the Church of the Potential Father.

The fact that Bree is not only determined and focused but also rather clever, often at her own expense (or at least, at an expense that you get because you know her dilemma and Toby does not), makes her endearing. It also makes you wonder about the series of decisions she makes in order that the film earns its cutesy title -- she and Toby end up driving cross country, getting to know one another and meeting each other's families in order to find themselves.

First stop: Kentucky, where Toby's redneck stepfather lives in a trailer, apparently so stuck in his stereotype that he can't keep his hands off Toby even for an evening. Bree is horrified that her son has been so ill-treated as a youngster, and considers that this may explain his current cockiness and half-assed hustling. It also means that their journey will continue, as Bree can't leave Toby in Kentucky, having witnessed this horror. And so, because Bree can't bring herself to confess her actual relationship to Toby, and he's not inclined to take advice from a church lady, they ride along encased in a kind of dull tension, ever on the edge of revelation, yet hanging back... because the movie must go on for another hour or so.


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Unimaginative
Posted by: BlueTigress on Dec 6, 2005 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had heard a review of this movie on NPR during the summer and it sounded mildy interesting. This review makes it sound tedious, like it's an old script that was dusted off and shot because someone needed a project.

A lot of this was already done or at least touched on in movies in the '80s and '90s (Tootsie, Soapdish).

Having a woman play the male-to-female transgender seems to be a lazy bit of casting for the director, even though the actress did have to wrestle with a fake penis for the film.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scott
Posted by: Scott on Dec 10, 2005 11:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, this sound like a real downer!!!!! Personally I want to see the one with the two COWBOYS that is coming out. Forget the name, Back something Mountain, set in the 1960-70, I guess one of them is married and one is not, and they WANT a ranch together??? Sounds cool to me!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I disagree with both postings above...
Posted by: Ziad on Dec 17, 2005 8:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I totally disagree with both of the above postings (Scott's is hardly worth remarking on as it reads like a 13 year old's pre-adolescent musings on transexuality). Transgenderism is a very complex, deep topic and it's great to see films coming out on such a previously taboo topic. I remember watching "Paris is Burning" when it first came out in 1990 and the embarassment of queueing up to the the ticket was palpable for many, and remarked on. It's SUCH a hard road for transpeople, everyday people are so callous and harsh to them (like Scott's comments above). Beyond that, many are murdered by dumbass college jock types every year--talk about a hate crime. Their families often abandon them if they try to come out. Imagine if your mom, dad, and siblings totally blew you off--and kicked you out on the streets! This happens all the time to trans people. Think of it: what if in your heart and mind you totally identified with the opposite gender? It is one of the hardest things to deal with on ALL LEVELS imaginable: physically, socially, and emotionally. Think about it.

Even if this film is served up as movie entertainment, it is good because it is raising awareness about a deep issue that needs to be brought into the public's dialogue about human sexuality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Personally
Posted by: dlf on Dec 18, 2005 4:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I long for the days when your sexuality was your own. I'm tired of everyone thinking that their personal preference is something they need to share with any and everyone. A show like Queer Eye is the gay version of blackface to me. I mean really, would anyone be interested in a show called Straight Squad where a group of burly guys took wimps and beefed them up while making lewd jokes about their straight studliness? Don't get me wrong I'm not advocating people go back into the closet, but you don't have to show me everything that's in it either. A perfect example is Ellen Degeneres I know she is a lesbian but her humor isn't derived from it. Her humor is funny because it is. Queer Eye is the same joke told over and over again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]