Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Accidental Activists

By Michael Blanding, AlterNet. Posted December 6, 2005.


For Craig and Cindy Corrie, the death of their daughter in Israel was the start of a new mission in life: continuing her campaign for human rights in Palestine.
120605_story
Accidental Activists
Advertisement

Her name is Cindy, her child was killed in the Middle East, and she is on a relentless campaign to change U.S. and international policy. But she isn't Cindy Sheehan; she's Cindy Corrie.

Corrie is the mother of slain activist Rachel Corrie, who was killed by an Israeli bulldozer in the Gaza Strip two and a half years ago while trying to protect a home from demolition by the Israeli military. Since then, Cindy and her husband Craig have pushed for answers about their daughter's death, and have themselves become activists, touring the country in the cause of human rights for Palestinians.

"When Rachel was killed," says Cindy, "there was the sense that we needed to do something. It's my response to most things in life to take some action and not let something difficult defeat you."

Monday's suicide bombing of an Israeli shopping mall, in which at least five people were killed and more than 50 wounded, is a stark reminder of the violence that continues to wrack the country. Still the Corries remain convinced that support for Palestinian human rights is the only long-term solution.

"Of course we are against suicide bombing -- it's horrible and those are human rights abuses," Cindy says. "But there are a greater number of Palestinian civilians who have been killed by this occupation, and I don't think most Americans know what we are supporting with our tax dollars."

In shining a spotlight on U.S. foreign policy, the Corries join a growing contingent of "soccer-mom activists" who draw their moral authority from suffering one of the worst experiences imaginable--the death of their child. In another country they'd be Mothers of the Disappeared. Here they are Gold Star Families for Peace and Military Families Speak Out. Or they are individuals like Sheehan--who has galvanized the anti-war movement by confronting President Bush over the death of her son Casey in Iraq--or the family of pro footballer Pat Tillman, victim of a friendly-fire incident in Afghanistan and subsequent cover-up by the US military. Unlike these families, however, the Corries' child wasn't killed doing her military duty; Rachel was an activist and a civilian casualty of conflict.

In the past two years, the Corries have created a foundation in their daughter's name to fund peace and justice work; given countless presentations on the issue of home demolition in Palestine; sued the Israeli government for the wrongful death of their daughter; and even launched a boycott and lawsuit against Caterpillar, Inc., the maker of the bulldozer involved in Rachel's death, accusing the company of complicity in "war crimes."

Yet, the Corries are anything but typical activists.

Political Inspiration

At a recent appearance in a church basement in Cambridge, Massachusetts, where they were giving a slide presentation on the Israeli occupation, Cindy, 58, was dressed in a patterned red cardigan over a shapeless black dress and white mock-turtleneck, giving her the appearance of a second-grade teacher. And in his grey plaid coat, Craig Corrie, 59, looked the part of his former job as an insurance company executive.

Neither Craig nor Cindy was politically active before the run-up to the Iraq War. But a few months before Rachel's death, partially inspired by their daughter, they began to hold signs on street corners and even marched in Washington against the invasion. "I think I was more involved in the issue because of the work that Rachel was doing," says Cindy.

When Rachel originally told her parents she was going to Palestine to act as a human shield with the International Solidarity Movement (ISM), the Corries were concerned, but didn't try to talk her out of it. "I said I would have preferred she volunteer at a soup kitchen," Craig says, "but you can't ask your child to be less than they are going to be."

Besides, says Craig, he had served as squad leader of an engineering unit in Vietnam, and he believed that soldiers did not take a life lightly. "The people around me (in Vietnam) were humane, and if a protester was getting in our way, we could have arrested them."

Craig, however, was unaware of the state of tensions on the ground in Palestine. ISM was and continues to be a highly controversial group amongst both Israelis and mainstream American Jews. Some regard ISM as nonviolent protesters intent on drawing the eyes of the world to the oppression of the Palestinian people. To others, ISM members are seen as meddlers who interfere with the legitimate actions of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) in combating terrorism--or are possibly terrorist sympathizers themselves.

It wasn't until Rachel arrived in Rafah, at the end of the Gaza Strip on the border with Egypt, that her father began to worry. In Rachel's emails home, she described soldiers indiscriminately shooting at windows and houses. Two days before she arrived, an 8-year-old had been shot and killed. "When I actually started reading what she wrote, I realized what she was seeing was a military out of control," says Craig. "That just scared me to death."

Before Rachel joined up with ISM, the Corries say they were unconditionally sympathetic toward the Israelis, horrified by reports of suicide bombers on the nightly news. Rachel's emails began to show them a bigger picture--of a Palestinian people crowded into a tight space and traumatized by a military occupation.


Digg!

Michael Blanding is a freelance writer living in Boston. Read more of his writing at MichaelBlanding.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The counterprotestors defaming this girl who was killed......
Posted by: Pepper on Dec 6, 2005 3:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..... neglected to say that other options were available at the time than to kill an unarmed civilian 22 year old. They could have arrested her and removed her from the scene.

I don't care if she was a flag burning person, she has, under our Constitution, the right to protest, as much as they didn't like it. If she broke any laws, the question then becomes, "were they death penalty laws?" If not, then the Isreali government owes these people not only an answer, accountability, but an investigation and corrective action, but do I think they will get it from this government in Isreal??? NO! I don't.

After all, according to an investigative reporter (Barry Chamish) in Isreal who happens to be an Isreali, this group running this current government there were complicit in the assassination of Rabin who was trying to solve the palestinian problem through real negotiations and peaceful means. So they killed him.

I suspect and believe that Sharon's gov is not out for a peaceful solution rather the Nazi type of "solution" to the problem as Hitler was so fond of saying. This maybe harsh, but from everything I am reading, its worse than I am even presenting here.

We need to withdraw our money, foreign aid, military aid and every other aid until this all stops. What about the terrorist acts by the Palestinians??? What is the difference when you have no weapons and your enemy has high tech state of the art military weapons used ( and out of control) by the military? They kill women, children and old people just like the suicide bombers do.

They simply have less choices in weapons to fight back with. I think the choices are becoming fewer and fewer here. Good luck to her parents in continuing to expose the truth of this pathetic and horrible situation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "religious freedom?" Posted by: decembrist
» RE: "religious freedom?" Posted by: blueneck
The historical context
Posted by: goldbeme on Dec 6, 2005 5:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Corries, and Pepper are truly kindhearted and generous in their support of the Palestinians and their excoriation of Israel. However, they are also breathtaking in their ignorance of the historical context of the current situation. After the horrors of WWII the United Nations agreed to legitimate the British plan, dividing Palestine into three parts: a Jewish part on the coast, an Arab part in the interior, and Jerusalem would remain an international city, administered by the UN. THE JEWS AGREED TO THIS DIVISION, THE ARABS TURNED IT DOWN, PRERFERRING INSTEAD TO INVADE AND DESTROY THE NASCENT JEWISH STATE. THEY LOST. Before the war, some Arabs left, hoping to return behind the victorious Arab armies. Some stayed. Their descendents 1.2 million or so, are the most prosperous non-oil-dependent Arabs in the middle East, and until the Iraqi elections the only ones who had free elections. There are Arabs in the Knesset. So much for 'ethnic cleansing', Pepper.


AFter the war, Israel absorbed as many Jewish refugees from Arab countries as Arabs had left Israel. The Arabs, instead of absorbing their displaced brothers, left them to fester in camps. In contrast, Germany (East and West) absorbed 12 million Sudeten and East Prussian Germans. Koenigsburg, the city of Immanuel Kant, is now Kaliningrad in Russia. But the Arabs left their people to the hell of the camps.

Until the Arabs agree that Israel exists (and Hamas still vows, with the help of Iran, to destroy it entirely, and dance in the ruins of Tel Aviv!) and that they are willing to live peacefully next to a secure Israel, life will not be fun in the occupied terrirtories. Remember that Arafat turned down a deal giving the Arabs 95% of the West Bank. They are not going to get back Ma'aleh Adumim, a suburb of Jerusalem built out of the desert, or the Old City of Jerusalem. Germany lives with the fact that Danzig (now GDansk) and Koenigsburg are lost forever. No one complains for the legitimate rights of the Sudeten Germans.

Furthermore, life in Palestine is still a lot more fun than life in Darfur. A pity Rachel Corrie did not go there, where Arabs are raping and torturing and killing thousands and thousands of innocent people at the same time that the Israelis are destroying a few houses in reprisal for suicide bombings.
And if she had been run over by a Hummer in Corrieville would the Corries be picketing GM?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The historical context Posted by: Greatdentini
» RE: The historical context Posted by: Pepper
» RE: The historical context Posted by: Greatdentini
» slippery little moral attitude Posted by: decembrist
» RE: The historical context Posted by: mythbuster
» RE: The historical context Posted by: kablooie
agitator church and state
Posted by: eileenflmng on Dec 6, 2005 6:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Rachel was killed," says Cindy, "there was the sense that we needed to DO SOMETHING"

In 3 weeks I will be Reporting at Holy Land Trusts Celebrating Nonviolent Resisitance Conference where Cindy Corrie will be one of many speakers who are DOING SOMETHING.

Last month on the WAWA blog I reported on the Anarchists Against the Wall USA tour and learned:

"The Israeli Defense Force fired ONE MILLION THREE HUNDRED BULLETS BEFORE THE FIRST SUICIDE BOMBING"

want to do something too?
read the DO SOMETHING page on WAWA and do it:
http://www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: agitator church and state Posted by: kablooie
History, Huh?
Posted by: radicalmum on Dec 6, 2005 11:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you really want to talk about history, why don't you branch out? Pretty much every other race has exiled or killed Jews at some moment through out history. Why is that? Honest question, not anti-semetics, of which I'm sure I will be accused. Maybe those put in power just never learn to "play well with others." They were given Israel out of guilt, what other maleigned race has gotten that and many other luxuries? Being of Shawnee blood, I can assure you mine has not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Reasons for Persecution Posted by: blueneck
» montana freeman Posted by: trace
No end in sight...
Posted by: Rod in 83706 on Dec 6, 2005 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Way back during the Eisenhower administration the US made a huge mistake in opting to support one side over the other in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. We should have made the right decision then - neutrality. Just imagine.....there would have been no Marine Corps barracks bombing in Beirut, no USS Cole bombing, no nightclubs blown up in Germany, and no 9-11, just to name a few losses of American life. And just imagine how many billions of dollars we wouldn't have squandered in aid to both sides to keep the carnage going.

It is none of our business. It has been none of our business for over 50 years. I am so disgusted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No end in sight... Posted by: tcx2
Well, there you have it...
Posted by: Greatdentini on Dec 6, 2005 12:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More moral nonsense and historical distortion from someone who's not interested in a solution, just a justification of Zionistic expansionism at any price for the rest of the world.

shameless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ONLY TIME WILL TELL??
Posted by: Greatdentini on Dec 6, 2005 12:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What bullshit. Zionists will say anything, no matter how blatently immoral.

THERE IS NO "TIME TO TELL" IF YOU'RE ON THE RECEIVING END OF A GENOCIDE.

SHARON HAS COMMITTED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY IN THE PAST -- SO THE WAITING PERIOD IS OVER.

For the sake of world peace, Israel must go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ANOTHER ZIONIST LIE
Posted by: Greatdentini on Dec 6, 2005 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So there's no recognition of Israel? What a lie... besides Egypt,

ZIONISTS WILL TELL ANY LIE AND DISTORTION THEY CAN. Doubtless they have even altered and destroyed historical documents for their cause.

But, y'know... I personally don't recognize Israel. There. Feel better? Now you can go out and kill some Palestinian children, balkanize their land, build a wall over their property, control their water supply, slow their access to medical attention, and commit A SLOW BUT DETERMINED GENOCIDE.

Palestinian Recognition

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ANOTHER ZIONIST LIE Posted by: decembrist
AND HERE'S THE DIFFERENCE
Posted by: Greatdentini on Dec 6, 2005 12:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those other groups that were persecuted didn't turn around AND PERSECUTE OTHERS WHILE MAKE THE WHOLE WORLD A WORSE AND MORE UNSTABLE PLACE TO LIVE.

Got it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is all Hitler's fault.
Posted by: humanity101 on Dec 6, 2005 3:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hiding under the "anti-semitism" banner, the Israelis continue commit atrocities against another people with immunity. It's almost like an Israeli can shoot and kill any human and if you criticize him, then they start calling you "anti-semitic". Duh!!! Hello!!! They defied every UN resolution. They defied international law and human rights. Let's see if they are so tough without our tax dollars. But what they don't understand is what goes around comes around. They fired missiles at some militants, the militants sent a suicide bombers and the cycle keeps repeating itself. Can these stupid idiots see that this does not work??? How long have they been doing it? Shouldn't they stop and think a little bit for God's sake? The only way to break out of a circle is to break away from it. You go into other people's land, oppress them and build a wall to trap them? You will fail. It is so obvious. No wonder the extremist Jews say "the world is against us". Yes, for a good reason.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It is all Hitler's fault. Posted by: AdamBaum
the website to see cleric speech
Posted by: AdamBaum on Dec 6, 2005 9:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Root causes of terror
Posted by: AdamBaum on Dec 7, 2005 5:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to the FrontPage Magazine:

The Palestinian daily, al Hayat al Jadida has reported that Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas, signed a new law to support the families of suicide bombers.

Enacting a special law to financially support terrorists will ensure that this kind of activity continues. Each shahid's family will receive a monthly stipend of at least $250. The family of a married shahid will receive an additional $50. Parents will receive an additional $25, and each additional child and/or brother or sister will get another $15.

The PA's message to its people is clear, suicide bombings are legitimate and worthy of state compensation. In a major piece on the motivation of female suicide bombers, it would have made sense for Newsweek to recognize the support their families receive from the PA.

GLORIFICATION OF "MARTYRDOM" BY PA

As documented by Palestinian Media Watch, the Palestinian Authority continues to run media programming that encourages suicide attacks. This has not changed since the death of Arafat, despite the PA's clear Road Map obligations to end all incitement and control terror. Here are just a few recent examples that can be accessed by the PMW link above:

November 2005: PA names recently opened Rafah border crossing with Egypt after Al-Moayed Al-Agha, who killed 5 Israelis in the area last year. To make clear the honor they are bestowing on Al-Agha, the PA erects a huge sign at border depicting an armed Al-Agha and a map of the entire State of Israel.

CNN, November 25, 2005

August 2005: The PA's Ministry of Culture releases "Book of the Month", a poetry collection honoring suicide terrorist Hanadi Jaradat, who murdered 21 Israelis. It was distributed as a special supplement in the daily Al-Ayyam, the official PA newspaper.

July 2005: Al-Ayyam, whose editors are appointed by Abbas, endorsed terror attack on Israeli couple, granting the most elevated status to the murderers, the status of "Shahid", Martyr for Allah

These examples are just a few that have appeared since the death of Arafat. When media like Newsweek try to examine the "root causes" of suicide bombing, they should examine the Palestinian Authority's actions and communications with its constituents rather than rely on unofficial PA "spokesmen" like Dr. Sarraj.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]