Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Path To Peace

By Robert Dreyfuss, TomPaine.com. Posted December 2, 2005.


The Cairo peace conference shows Iraq's factions are willing to do their part. Now it's time for the Bush administration to act.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Robert Dreyfuss

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Something is stirring in Iraq in the wake of the historic meeting last weekend in Cairo, sponsored by the League of Arab States, in which virtually all of Iraq's political factions sat down to talk at a reconciliation conference. Three important things took place at that meeting. First, primarily at the insistence of the Sunni delegates, all participants called for a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq, putting virtually the entire Iraqi establishment behind a call for the United States to leave Iraq; second, all participants declared in the official statement that "resistance is a legitimate right of all peoples," thus conferring near-recognition to the armed Iraqi opposition inside Iraq; and third, the meeting set a date in February to convene a second, much larger, conference that could help settle the war in Iraq diplomatically.

That is, if the Bush administration steps up to the opportunity created by the Cairo initiative. That initiative, incidentally, was supported not only by the Arab League but by Iran, the United Nations, the European Union and Russia.

The main task for the United States after Cairo, besides getting its force ready to pack up and leave, is to sit down face to face and talk peace with the Iraqi Baath party. Not with the malleable, quisling-like Sunnis that it has previously enticed into previous Iraqi interim governments. Not with a handful of Sunni tribal chieftains who can be bribed, cajoled, or blackmailed into joining the regime of the Shiite-religious parties. Rather the United States has to talk directly with the leaders of the Iraqi resistance. And that means the Baath.

Why is it so important to talk to the Baathists? Simply because, like it or not, the remnants of the millions-strong Baath in Iraq are the backbone of the Iraqi insurgency. That insurgency is not, chiefly, a force led either by foreigners or by radical-right Islamists like those of the Zarqawi-led Al Qaeda in Iraq. The Baath provides the generals, the officers, the platoon commanders, the intelligence experts, the makers of roadside bombs, the spies who infiltrate Iraq's government and even the U.S. occupation army (via translators, cooks and drivers). It is the Baath with the network of outside support that stretches into Syria, Jordan, the Gulf states and Yemen, and which maintains a web of ties to senior Arab government officials -- including the Arab League. During the Cairo meeting, at the insistence of the Shiite leaders, Baathists were excluded from the meeting room itself. But they were in the corridors, conducting talks with critical Iraqis who want to settle the war and get U.S. troops out.

Since the Cairo meeting, key Iraqis, including President Talabani and his security adviser, have said repeatedly that they are making contacts with resistance groups. It isn't, yet, exactly clear who these groups are, and whether or not they represent anything important. According to The New York Times, Talabani's security adviser, a general and former intelligence officer, said: "I received phone calls from different movements, different groups, some claiming they represent the resistance. They said they're ready to participate in the political process."

In his blog Informed Comment , Juan Cole reports (in far more detail than the U.S. media, naturally) that the CIA, various Arab intelligence services, some Iraqi government officials, and key segments of the Iraqi resistance -- which Cole suspects are "mostly neo-Baathist" -- met in the environment of the Cairo conference. They discussed how to isolate the Zarqawi-linked terrorists, and they put forward (as Cole reports, in translation from an Arab newspaper) four requirements:


Digg!

Robert Dreyfuss is the author of Devil's Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam (Henry Holt/Metropolitan Books, 2005). He is a contributing editor at The Nation, a contributing writer at Mother Jones, a senior correspondent for The American Prospect, and a frequent contributor to Rolling Stone.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This sounds so good, but there is no way Bush will let go of the oil
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Dec 2, 2005 2:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since no one talks about the oil being the reason Bush went into Iraq in the first place; it is hard to bring it up now. I still think the dividing of Iraq into three parts sounds good. When we have a mad man for a president, I have no idea how this country can manage anything intelligent, short of impeachment of both Bush and Cheney. Lets just have a new presidential election 2006. One that is not rigged by Dibolt. You can go to GAO websight and read about the Ohio election and rigged voting machines. It is very interesting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Way on two counts
Posted by: cyclone on Dec 2, 2005 7:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Boosh and the CIA are at war with one another, and it may take the CIA to bring him down. That is their goal, there is no partnership between the two.

Iraq wants us out, Americans want us out, and the fictional "coalition partners" are leaving in droves with their 20 or 30 troops in tow. Does Boosh listen or give a shit? No, because he's insane and this was never about Iraq or the Iraqi people to begin with. He doesn't care who lives or dies, we just have to "stay the course." And we put up with it. We put up with something that we will NEVER recover from, led by a fucking madman and his Necon, lunatic cohorts.

But, don't worry. It will be okay. This is AMERICA and it's always been okay before. Yeah, Right. It sickens me to watch MY country implode, due to the sheer ignorance and lack of fortitude shown by our elected representatives and our populace.

One with the IQ of an eggplant can see what's going on here. IF they care, or should I say, DARE to look.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No Way on two counts Posted by: ScottP
» RE: No Way on two counts Posted by: cyclone
» RE: No Way on two counts Posted by: ScottP
» RE: No Way on two counts Posted by: cyclone
Cairo isn't a good place to hold a peace meeting even for starters
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 2, 2005 8:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As it is Egypt seems to be in unstable mode all the time and isn't it a puppet leadership there?

P.S. Trying to get the mid-east in peace mode feels at least 10 times tougher than turning the upper mid-west and the rural north in general cool and blue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It won't matter to Bush
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Dec 2, 2005 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You could have everyone in Iraq say they want peace,but if it's not the kind of 'Piece' Bush wants,the war will forge on.
The Administration wants it's fingers in the region. Either as
a 'Biznuss' partner or antagonist. Once the people of Iraq finally give in to Bush's demands,then we'll see Peace.
But the only ones who will benefit from it will be the World's wealthy Industrialists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It won't matter to Bush Posted by: ShaSpirit
Bush will do whatever it takes to make him look like a winner.
Posted by: Sojourner on Dec 2, 2005 12:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If he can declare victory, regardless of what is happening in the real world, he will do it. He's a politician. He lies as necessary. He needs a 'backdoor' as does everyone who takes a risk.

We can hope that down the road there will be the little matter of 'war criminal.' But so long as he hides out in friendly territory, he doesn't have to worry about that. The Supreme Court belongs to him, remember? So legal delays, etc., can be prolonged by the lawyers for many generations to come.

One of the prices we pay for our freedom is that even crooks can use the law to their advantage. So he will.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

agitator church and state
Posted by: eileenflmng on Dec 2, 2005 5:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thomas Jefferson agreed with Bush that Jesus's PHILOSOPHY should be heeded.

Jefferson cut from the Bible the divisive stories about Christ such as the virgin birth, all the miracles including the Resurrection and what he had left was entitled:

THE PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS of JESUS of NAZARETH

To site two philosophies:
Always treat people the way you want to be treated and Always work for PEACEFUL resolutions, even to the point of returning violence with COMPASSION.

IMAGINE if our Christian President followed more closely his favorite Philosopher.

read more WAWA blog 11/15/05 entry
http://www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]