Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

How The Bush Administration Got Spooked

By Tom Engelhardt, Tomdispatch.com. Posted November 26, 2005.


Starting when he blinked in the face of Cindy Sheehan's challenge, the political landscape has tilted steeply away from President Bush in recent weeks.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Tom Engelhardt

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

It's finally Wizard of Oz time in America. You know -- that moment when the curtains are pulled back, the fearsome-looking wizard wreathed in all that billowing smoke turns out to be some pitiful little guy, and everybody looks around sheepishly, wondering why they acted as they did for so long.

Starting on September 11, 2001 -- with a monstrous helping hand from Osama bin Laden -- the Bush administration played the fear card with unbelievable effectiveness. For years, with its companion "war on terror," it trumped every other card in the American political deck. With an absurd system for color-coding dangers to Americans, the President, the Vice President, and the highest officials in this land were able to paint the media a "high" incendiary orange and the Democrats an "elevated" bright yellow, functionally sidelining them.

How stunningly in recent weeks the landscape has altered -- almost like your basic hurricane sweeping through some unprotected and unprepared city. Now, to their amazement, Bush administration officials find themselves thrust through the equivalent of a Star-Trekkian wormhole into an anti-universe where everything that once worked for them seems to work against them. As always, in the face of domestic challenge, they have responded by attacking -- a tactic that was effective for years. The President, Vice President, National Security Adviser, and others have ramped up their assaults, functionally accusing Democratic critics of little short of treason -- of essentially undermining American forces in the field, if not offering aid and comfort to the enemy. On his recent trip to Asia, the President put it almost as bluntly as his Vice President did at home: "As our troops fight a ruthless enemy determined to destroy our way of life, they deserve to know that their elected leaders who voted to send them into war continue to stand behind them." The Democrats were, he said over and over, "irresponsible" in their attacks. Dick Cheney called them spineless "opportunists" peddling dishonestly for political advantage.

But instead of watching the Democrats fall silent under assault as they have for years, they unexpectedly found themselves facing a roiling oppositional hubbub threatening the unity of their own congressional party. In his sudden, heartfelt attack on Bush administration Iraq plans ("a flawed policy wrapped in illusion") and his call for a six-month timetable for American troop withdrawal, Democratic congressional hawk John Murtha took on the Republicans over their attacks more directly than any mainstream Democrat has ever done. ("I like guys who've never been there that criticize us who've been there. I like that. I like guys who got five deferments and never been there and send people to war, and then don't like to hear suggestions about what needs to be done. I resent the fact, on Veterans Day, he [Bush] criticized Democrats for criticizing them.") Perhaps more important, as an ex-Marine and decorated Vietnam veteran clearly speaking for a military constituency (and possibility some Pentagon brass), he gave far milder and more "liberal" Democrats cover.

For the first time since the war in Iraq began, "tipping points," constantly announced in Iraq but never quite in sight, have headed for home. Dan Bartlett, counselor to the President and drafter of recent Presidential attacks on the Democrats, told David Sanger of the New York Times that "Bush's decision to fight back... arose after he became concerned the [Iraq] debate was now at a tipping point"; while Howard Fineman of Newsweek dubbed Murtha himself a "one-man tipping point."

Something indeed did seem to tip, for when the White House and associates took Murtha on, John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, and other Democrats leaped aggressively to his defense. In fact, something quite unimaginable even a few days earlier occurred. When Republican Rep. Jean Schmidt of Ohio, the most junior member of the House, accused Murtha (via a Marine colonel from her district) of being a coward, Democratic Representative Harold Ford from Tennessee "charged across the chamber's center aisle to the Republican side screaming that Ms. Schmidts's attack had been unwarranted. 'You guys are pathetic!' yelled Representative Martin Meehan, Democrat of Massachusetts. 'Pathetic.'"


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Tom Engelhardt, editor of Tomdispatch.com, is co-founder of the American Empire Project and author of "The End of Victory Culture."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yes, and the world is even bigger than that
Posted by: IanA on Nov 26, 2005 3:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Confined in the dark, narrow cage of our own making that we take for the whole universe, very few of us can even begin to imagine another dimension of mind. Patrul Rinpoche tells the story of an old frog who had lived all his life in a dank well. One day a frog from the sea paid him a visit.

“Where do you come from?” asked the frog in the well.
“From the great ocean,” he replied.
“How big is your ocean?”
“It’s gigantic.”
“You mean about a quarter of the size of my well here?”
“Bigger.”
“Bigger? You mean half as big?”
“No, even bigger.”
“Is it . . . as big as this well?”
“There’s no comparison.” “That’s impossible! I’ve got to see this for myself.”


They set off together. When the frog from the well saw the ocean, it was such a shock that his head just exploded into pieces.

With acknowledgement and thanks to:
RIGPA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» NICE! Posted by: qrswave
» Whaaaa? Posted by: oldsmobile_
» RE: Whaaaa? Posted by: krose
Democrats Conspicuous by Silence
Posted by: david.model@senecac.on.ca on Nov 26, 2005 4:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another conclusion drawn from the collapse of the formerly invincible and impervious presidency of George W. is the fact that the Democrats are spineless and vacuous.

Waiting until it was safe to attack the president for his policies in Iraq is a sign of weakness. If they believed on principle that the decision to attack Iraq and militarily occupy it, then they would have spoken out sooner.

Even if one overlooks their original support for the war and the military occupation, events recently have offered sufficient evidence that the war and the occupation were wrong. The Downing Street Memos, the Plame disaster, the lack of progress of American forces in Iraq and all the evidence that Iraq had neither WMD nor ties to al Qaeda should have persuaded a reasonable observer that the policy on Iraq was wrong.

If the opposition bases its strategy on polls and the growing attacks on the presidency then they really aren't opposition. They are no different than the moderate Republicans who have changed their mind.

Author of "Lying for Empire: How to Commit War Crimes with a Straight Face"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Come on! Posted by: qrswave
» RE: Democrats Conspicuous by Silence Posted by: liberalibrarian
» RE: Democrats Conspicuous by Silence Posted by: shawn@shawnsandersphotography.com
Now is the time for the VISION THING
Posted by: ggmurray on Nov 26, 2005 8:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Come on, Democrats - the field is wide open. In all this disarray it is time for a clear vision of another kind of future for America. How to bring an end to the debacle in Iraq. How to bring universal health care to the American people. How to move completely off oil and nuclear energy - and stimulate a whole alternate energy industry in its place. How to bring meaninful work and meaningful wages to American families. Let's hear it Democrats!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Money: The Greatest Lie Ever Told Posted by: SevenStarHand
» Hello Seven Star Hand Posted by: qrswave
» Spineless Progressives.... Posted by: CatDad
marmaduke040
Posted by: marmaduke040 on Nov 26, 2005 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chemical-like? Is white phosphorus not a chemical? Let's call a spade a spade.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: marmaduke040 Posted by: Chris420
» RE: marmaduke040 Posted by: giles
Nuke the south
Posted by: mortarthegovernment on Nov 26, 2005 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the only option left.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nuke the south Posted by: owleyes
"The public interest be damned." -- Mainstream Media
Posted by: Sojourner on Nov 26, 2005 10:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, the Repugs are up to their necks in alligators. Don't forget that Bush barely won (needed the Supreme Court to put him in office) over Gore and then barely won (needed scandals in Ohio and elsewhere) over Kerry. Bush's style was to act as if he had a mandate, when he didn't. He got away with it because the mainstream media loves the drama, even of fools. Stunts are what sell newspapers; the public interest be damned.

Two years ago, a Murtha complaint would have been buried on the back pages. (Kerry was also a decorated vet, yet the Press allowed him to be discredited.) But to hope that seeing it in the headlines means changes in the Capitol is whistling past the graveyard, because Bush has no reason to change. He's a lame duck, and he is still the emperor.

True, those Demos and Repugs in Congress who won running on Bush's coattails better be worried about the elections a year from now. I expect it will be harder for him to extend his tax cuts and sleep at night. But even if the Demos in the House vote as a block and attract some vulnerable moderate Repugs, it still is not enough to stop Bush from further wrecking this nation.

So long as that man sits in the White House, there's no going back nor going forward. Essentially, nothing has changed, and it is necessary to battle him relentlessly just to survive the remainer of his term.

We have corruption as far as the eye can see.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Elucid
Posted by: Elucid on Nov 26, 2005 12:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The people of the world are not going to put up with overtly imperialistic aggression. Bush and those that supported him have lost political power and are in the process of being removed from power. Even the media that supported Bush are being scrutinized. There are many events swinging the pendulum the other way. The victims of Katrina clearly showed the Bush agenda as bogus. Torture is clearly opposed to the foundation of this country and the core belief and principles of its citizens.

The Bush Administration is made up of a bunch of has beens with failed policies of the Reagan and Papa Bush Presidencies. The world changed, became connected through economy, ease of travel, cost free communications, dwindling resources and the realization none of us can survive without working together. This Administration doesn't understand the new world and are not leaders.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: lucid Posted by: signifyingmonkey
» RE: lucid Posted by: tcx2
» RE: lucid Posted by: tcx2
» RE: lucid Posted by: tcx2
» RE: lucid Posted by: tcx2
» RE: lucid Posted by: Ely Whitney
» RE: lucid Posted by: tcx2
» RE: lucid Posted by: cacky
» RE: lucid Posted by: tcx2
Democratic Leadership
Posted by: Forestgunk on Nov 26, 2005 1:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is indeed a Democratic leadership vacuum for the coming elections in 2006 and 2008. As an independent, I think the landscape looks very bleak.

First, there is Hillary Clinton. Perhaps because of her affiliation with husband’s stupidity and moral weaknesses, and on her part, her own opportunistic ambitions and visionless agenda, she is hardly "electable".

Then there is????????????????????????????????????
See what I mean?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Democratic Leadership Posted by: jbetterl
» RE: Democratic Leadership Posted by: owleyes
» I AGREE! Posted by: qrswave
» RE: I AGREE! Posted by: signifyingmonkey
» RE: I AGREE! Posted by: jbetterl
» RE: I AGREE! Posted by: signifyingmonkey
» RE: Democratic Leadership Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Democratic Leadership Posted by: GreenLibbie
I do not think you look too hard for democrats who are do things
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Nov 26, 2005 3:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You and each person in your district and state are responsible for the people elect to go to congress and the white house. Get busy and find people you can support and work for. To just sit there and complain does not solve anything. If you want Democrats and independents that you can support then help get them elected.

Hillary is not judge by anyone for her husband's mistake. Most men just smirk about Bill's young intern and probably would have do the same thing if they had the chance with a young intern. The Republican just need an issue to impeach Clinton with. This was all they could find. With Bush and CO we could have a pick of many different things to impeach Bush for. Most people who felt Bill needed to be punish felt God did that as shown by his two heart operations.

Hillary has proved to be an excellent senator, who can be tough when it is need and is respected by both parties. I tell you what, there are many women who will vote for Hillary just because she is a woman. We are really tried of men who see themselves a little gods and women as their servants. The Christian right has pushed too hard on birth control, even daring to outlaw regular birth control from women, even married ones. It's Hillary's stance on the war will hurt her the most, not Bill's sexual misadventure in the oval office.

Bush and CO have poisoned their truth telling Republican party, don't you think? Too many lies and the more times they yell the Republican in congress are slimmed those lies. Most people can see that the real traitors are in the White House and they have committed war crimes, which I hope the world will punish them for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hillary? Not a chance Posted by: Brucewxx
RE: I Agree and Frogs
Posted by: IanA on Nov 27, 2005 4:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems at least someone is taking a look out of the well. It's not the ocean but it is a hopeful start. As you say, "America has never experienced this level of manipulation and you will see the dilemma they are facing now". And the answer is not going to come from some charismatic leader or a political party. Americans must see that their strength is to learn to think for themselves and to take on board and respect the diversity that the world offers. America cannot expand "freedom" and "democracy" through imperialism and military hegemony. Read, understand, educate yourselves and others. Only that can defeat the power of fascism which grows with ignorance and fear.

Good luck on your journey.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thank YOU, IanA... Posted by: qrswave
» RE: I Agree and Frogs Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: I Agree and Frogs Posted by: GreenLibbie
RED
Posted by: RED on Nov 27, 2005 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in Canada, and all I can say is, YAY! Man what took you guys so long to see reality. The Democrats I would say were suffering from the same mass delusion as the unwashed public, so I wouldn't blame them too much. We were shocked obviously as the rest of the world was by 9-11, but it only took Canadians a week to recover. Then I kept seeing GWB keep saying 9-11 and Iraq in the same sentence and either by way of the cowed media or the seemingly compliant nature of Americans, it worked and a majority of Amercans bought it hook, line and sinker. The president totally pissed away all the good will that America had then. A chance was lost to truly build a new world order. Unfortunately, once the troops were in, no criticism was allowed. Anyhow, I just came back from a business trip to California and the Northwest and my businees associates there are finally seeing the light. The long dark night is over. Welcome back to the free world America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

tunnelman
Posted by: tunnelman on Nov 27, 2005 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe not a wormhole but a view from the outside of a different kind of hole.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeachment and tried for war crimes
Posted by: whyoung on Nov 27, 2005 11:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will not be satisfied until justice has been served and these thugs are punished for the murder of thousands of innocent people and the theft of billions of taxpayer dollars.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Join the Ultimate Poll
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 28, 2005 4:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Polls are, it might be said, what's left of American democracy. Privately run, often for profit or advantage, they nonetheless are as close as we come these days -- actual elections being what they are -- to the expression of democratic opinion,
Join the Lincoln initiative, non-partisan, no dues, no contributions, no registration. It will cost you four stamps and 30 minutes of your time. This, the ultimate poll, is a grass roots movement to define the platforms of both parties. Tell both parties your most important issue and that you will not support any candidate who does not have a plan to carry it out. do it today

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

agitator church and state
Posted by: eileenflmng on Nov 28, 2005 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'The Wizard of Oz' has pulled more curtains and has exposed even more on WAWA:

www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tough Executive Decision:Shall we go to war, or shall we not go to war?
Posted by: jobie1kno on Nov 28, 2005 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Iraq debacle was badly conceived and poorly executed, and we are simply seeing the results of such today. What has come to light in the last 3 years, such as cherry-picked intelligence, media manipulation, human rights failures and so on is simply par-for-the-course, after the grand opening act of this White House. How any advanced' government can 'order' pre-emptive war 'to-go' in Iraq, and not understand the direct and indirect consequences of such action is truly amazing.

But, since the WH is spooked, and will do anything now (including, throw what remains of Iraq under the bus) to keep the repug. majority in power come the 2006 election (or waste 30 years of hard work), we must be more vocal than ever. As soon as the republicans become a minority, you can bet the spookings, and real investigations, will really start.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The regimes' response to distress?
Posted by: citizenjoe on Nov 28, 2005 6:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok, the tide is turning and the Regime is desperate: what will they do about it? Foment another terrorist attack; maybe some more anthrax sent to Congress so the Regime must shut it down for the Congresses own protectection, just in time for the 2006 elections? That's just a guess, but it is very plausible. That is an appropriate tactic for authoritarians like Bush who think they know what is best for you.-- Joe

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WE MAY HAVE TO MARCH
Posted by: krose on Nov 28, 2005 7:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WE MAY EVENTUALLY NEED TO RESORT TO MARCHING IN THE STREETS, like the Ukraines, if they pull something! I wouldn't put anything past this bunch! They have already called for the mobilization of the military for such crises as the bird flu "epidemic!" The word, "terrorism" can strike fear in the heart of the average person if nuanced appropriately. When panicked sufficently in this 911 era, it is not unreasonable to believe that many people could be frightened into giving up some of their rights, unless there is ample, loud, clear and cogent discussion to the contrary! We have already done just that, to some extent, in the Patriot Act, which this president wants to expand!

In light of this psychology, I believe that the Democrats should put up a male candidate who is strong, self-assured, possibly someone with strong military experience, but who has been against this illegal and immoral war from its outset. I am not sure who that person is yet, but I know that I am not impressed by anyone in the field thus far.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WE MAY HAVE TO MARCH Posted by: Lincoln fan
A Poll I´d like to see
Posted by: crachlis on Nov 28, 2005 10:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Bush were assisinated what would your responce be?
1) I would cry.
2) I would ask did they get Cheney too?
3) I would ask do we get a paid day off for the funeral?
4) I would celebrate.

Not that I have ever advocated any violent action other than self defence. Running Nazi´s off the streets would be considered such. But I would be interested if the K Street crowed would float such a poll.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]