Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Excerpt: Driven Mad by 'Demon Rum'

By Ian Williams, AlterNet. Posted December 2, 2005.


Despite the fact that rum has been widely important to the history of the U.S., it has been demonized by ignorance and hypocrisy.
120205_story2
Rum: Fuel For the Modern World
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The great days of Prohibition allowed the New England states to return to their historical roots -- as rum smugglers.

And just as the movers and shakers of the new American republic came to prominence, wealth, and influence as a result of their smuggling and rum trading with the connivance of ineffective enforcement, so too did the new dynasty of the later republic -- the Kennedys -- owe their origins to the trade.

Rum and slavery, Abolition and Prohibition, all shared similar roots in the American mind-set. James Oglethorpe, the founder of Georgia, banned slaves and rum -- and ended up with both. But the same New England Protestant fervor that cried down slavery also cried down the "demon rum." It was not always a well-advised demand.

Abraham Lincoln declared in 1840, when he was an Illinois legislator:

Prohibition will work great injury on the cause of temperance. It is a species of intemperance within itself, for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man's appetite by legislation and makes a crime of out of things that are not crimes. A prohibition law strikes at the very principle upon which our government was founded.

Lincoln's good sense was ignored. Rarely has a democracy taken such a nannying attitude to its citizens as the United States, filling its prisons with perpetrators of victimless crimes, whether in the name of a war on drugs, homosexuality, prostitution, or, for so many years, the war against the Demon Rum. White, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant Republican clergymen castigated the Democrats as "the party whose antecedents have been Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion," shorthand for Southerners and Irish.

Insanity can be infectious. Much of Canada was afflicted, but mercifully for only a short period before seeing the folly of the project. Discussions of Prohibition in the United States often overlook the Canadian experience, which began by allowing localities to declare themselves dry and moved on to a Prohibition referendum in 1898, which was won by 51 percent of the vote. Quebec exceptionalism saved the day, however. Prime Minister Sir Wilfred Laurier had counted the votes as well, and he noted that Quebec, one of his major support bases, had voted by 81 percent against this crazy Anglo-Protestant idea. He realized that a federally enforced prohibition would precipitate much unease among his French-speaking voters, and so he did not try to implement it.

In the end, the matter was left to the provinces, some of which tried prohibition, while others made liquor a government monopoly. In the Maritime Provinces, such as Nova Scotia, rum had its strongest hold, and they returned large majorities for Prohibition. Nova Scotia mandated Prohibition everywhere except Halifax, which is where most of its people lived, but then it extended it to cover the entire province.

Newfoundland, independent at the time, voted for Prohibition in 1915, but had the good sense to repeal it in 1924, just in time to benefit from the Americans' mistake -- Newfoundland made the rum-running ships for the trade down the coast. It would compete with the French islanders from St. Pierre and Miquelon in smuggling rum -- and whiskey, gin, and anything else potable -- down the New England coast.

But the cunning Frenchies, vestiges of the eighteenth-century rum wars, were quicker off the mark, because they had begun by supplying Newfoundland when it introduced Prohibition in 1915. The rum that the Newfoundlanders imported was, according to Warner Allen, "portentous," and the sometime thriller writer and wine expert used his literary skills to describe it: "Neat, it was the most awe-inspiring liquor I ever tasted. Its smell was terrific, compounded of tar, and leather, and strange sea scents, and if ever there was a drink strong enough to float a handspike, it was the contraband rum of St. Johns, Newfoundland."

The paradox is that most Americans were drinking whiskey, rather than rum, as the American temperance movement lurched on toward Prohibition. But rum had become exalted as the demon spirit. Its rhyming, rhotic, and alliterative qualities allowed it to be used and abused as the epitome of evil, a sort of Platonic idea of mother's ruin, and to be paired with anything with which the preacher disapproved.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Ian Williams writes on the United Nations for AlterNet. His work has appeared in Foreign Policy in Focus, the Nation and Salon.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Obvious
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Dec 2, 2005 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The similarity to the present day marijuana and other illegal drugs situation is obvious. But I'll point it out for the neocons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Couldn't get through it and why
Posted by: peritonlogon on Dec 2, 2005 12:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
*Note, I quit reading this after about the 5th paragraph.

I generally agree with most things written for this magazine, including the ideas and, for the most part, the disposition of the author. However, the style of writing accros most of the site is tedius and tiresome. Specifically the language is always that of an invective, often filled with broad claims left unsupported, and sometimes feels like propoganda. Here is an example

"Rarely has a democracy taken such a nannying attitude to its citizens as the United States, filling its prisons with perpetrators of victimless crimes, whether in the name of a war on drugs, homosexuality, prostitution, or, for so many years, the war against the Demon Rum."

No doublt the US has done this... but I think 99% of democracies nanny their citizens as much as or more than the US. For example, Modern Europe. Ancient Athens, during the persian war, shipped all of its citizens out of the city to an Island. Everyone (read male) in Switzerland for a millenium has had to join the Army. Debtors prison in England (they were mostly democracy at the time), let me repeat DEBTORS prison. Singapore. I think that, upon reflection, one can see these all as examples of nannying, while not necessarily an American form of nannying. Furtherore, there are plenty of Americans without health insurance that I'm sure would love to have a Eurpoean, democratic Nanny as I write this.

I take no exception to anything in that sentance that follows "Rarely has a democracy taken such a nannying attitude to its citizens as the United States." But I just can't understand the purpose of this clause, it states a comparison, but does not compare. You can and should critique this country...but I want substance backing up every claim, not just a general negative attitude. I don't want to hear "America sucks," I want to hear "these are some Sucky things America has done and the perported reason for doing it and here's why, maybe if you cared and took part we wouldn't be doing them again today."

Thanks for letting me rant...Think I'll finish the article now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Couldn't get through it and why Posted by: peritonlogon
Here's a little story for you!
Posted by: fullavit@hotmail.com on Dec 2, 2005 5:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once uppon a time in "The Land of the free and the Home of the brave" a great number of people drank good whisky. AND THEY LIKED IT!!! Some people who didn't like whisky or anybody that drank it, saw the whiskey as a demon who they called "John Barley Corn" or "Demon Rum". They raised plenty of hell about it and screamed at anybody that would listen about how it was the "Ruination of Womanhood" and caused the husbands of the "Land of the Free and Home of the Brave" to leave work and go to the bars and socialise with their neighbors instead of going straight home from their jobs, like the nondrinkers thought they should.

Sure enough the Nondrinkers raised so much hell that the leaders of "The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave" got sick of hearing them and passed something called "Prohibition" to shut them all up. They thought that all would be good and the bars would all close and the men who liked whiskey would go home to their families and everyone would dance tra-la around the May-pole with the cute fuzzy animals. Alas!! Such was not the case!!

The drinkers liked John Barley Corn and Demon Rum and they were Free enough to get their hootch, and brave enough to shoot anybody that damn well said they couldn't have it!

So the girls grew up to be "Flappers" and the boys grew up to Be "Bootleggers". They bought guns and fast cars. They filled the fast cars up with liquor, and drove them hell for leather, shooting with the guns anybody who tried to stop them! Children got run over and shot, men hung out at illegal bars called "Speakeasies" and "Blind Pigs", and the cute fuzzy animals split for places where there weren't quite so many bullets zipping around and fast cars to dodge, and the bootleggers cut down the May-pole and split it up for firewood to fuel the still.

Finally a leader came along who saw what a big sorry mess that Prohibition had turned out to be and did awy with the whole thing! Their was great rejoicing throughout the land and the happy people danced down the street with Demon Rum and John Barley Corn! The people sang a song called "Happy days are here again." with joy in their hearts and they all got drunk and had a big fight, and all things were good again! YOU'LD THINK!!!

But alas! Those that think they know what's best for us came up with some silly shit called "The War on Drugs!" And all hell broke lose again!

Next chapter?
Stoney

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here's a little story for you! Posted by: peritonlogon