Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Who is Sherrod Brown?

By Christopher Hayes, In These Times. Posted December 2, 2005.


An unabashed progressive takes aim at a Senate seat.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Christopher Hayes

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

There are two small but revealing items affixed to Ohio's 13th District congressman Sherrod Brown. On his lapel, he wears not an American flag, but a pin of a yellow bird in a cage. On a Thursday morning in October, as we leave his office to walk to the Capitol for a committee meeting, Brown hands me a bookmark-sized slip of paper that explains: "The canary represents the struggle for economic and social justice." It recounts how miners once took canaries into the mines so that when the birds died, they knew the air was too toxic to breathe. "Miners were forced to provide for their own protection. No mine safety laws. No trade unions able to help. No real support from their government. … It has been a 100-year battle between the privileged and the rest of us."

Clipped to Brown's belt is a small blue pedometer, one of a pair worn by him and his wife Connie Schultz, a Pulitzer-Prize winning columnist at the Cleveland Plain Dealer. He walks, or perhaps more accurately, stalks all over Capitol Hill, leading with his chest pitched forward just slightly in a gait that is halfway between a bounce and a prowl. "He never takes the elevator," his spokesperson Joanna Kuebler tells me as we wait for Brown to emerge from a meeting with a group of scientists advocating for nuclear disarmament. When it's time for a vote on the Hill, he eschews the underground subway that whisks members from their office buildings to the Capitol.

Handsome, with a slightly weathered face, curly hair and a deep, warm voice, Brown is universally described as "down to earth." In person he's as unposed as any politician I've ever met. "Those are the columns my wife wrote that won the Pulitzer," he says, dumping a pile of papers into the lap of Rep. Sherwood Boehlert, who's waiting for the underground shuttle as we trot past. "He's a Republican," Brown whispers as we walk away, "but I like him. How could I not? He represents Cooperstown."

Brown, a huge baseball fan and an avid athlete, will to need to marshal every last bit of his considerable energy in the next year as he seeks to be become the first Democratic senator from the state of Ohio since John Glenn retired in 1998. He faces a primary challenge from Iraq war veteran and Internet darling Paul Hackett; if he wins the primary, he'll face Republican incumbent Mike DeWine, a senator with some of the lowest approval ratings in the country, but a seat that the Republicans will zealously defend. With Ohio still the nation's premier political battlefield, the race will be one of next year's most-watched campaigns: If a bedrock economic populist like Brown can win in a red state, it will explode the post-Clinton conventional wisdom that anything resembling "class warfare" is a non-starter for the Democrats.

But Brown's decision to enter the race after first saying he wouldn't prompted paroxysms of recrimination and anger in the blogosphere. "Brown's indecision created an ugly and totally unnecessary scene," wrote blogger Lindsay Beyerstein, one of Hackett's most prominent online supporters. "If he'd declared in the first place, Hackett probably wouldn't have challenged him for the nomination. Now, there's probably going to be a nasty little primary and lasting bad blood amongst Ohio Democrats. These are very real costs that Brown chose to inflict on his party."

Hackett, whom many bloggers treat like the local boy made good, and who was recently the subject of a glowing profile in Mother Jones titled "The Democrat Who Fought," provides the blogosphere an opportunity to prove, unequivocally, its own influence. "The reason to support Hackett over Brown is simple," wrote Beyerstein, "if Hackett wins (and he can win), the progressive blogosphere makes history."

Blog opinion on the race is by no means uniform. Many support Brown, but it's a strange feature of the blogosphere that a newcomer to politics like Hackett is widely considered a known quantity, while Brown, who's spent his entire adult life in public office, is a mystery. One skeptical blogger on the Web site Swing State Project summed up his reservations with a post titled: "Who is Sherrod Brown?"

Brown lacks the national profile of colleagues like Dennis Kucinich and Bernie Sanders, but for the duration of his six-and-a-half terms in office, he has been one of Congress's most stalwart progressives. "I've known him for many years," says Sanders. "What's very clear is that Sherrod Brown knows which side of the struggle he is on." And when Brown's friend John Ryan, executive secretary of the Cleveland AFL-CIO, says, "Sherrod Brown is one of us," he means it in the literal, familial sense. Brown's older daughter Emily is a union organizer for SEIU. When I met Brown, Emily had just lost a union election in a New Jersey nursing home. "She was crushed," Brown told me. "I mean, it's horrible. Have you ever sat and watched an election? They count the votes publicly and you can tell within 15 votes what's going to happen, and the workers are scared. … It's pretty depressing for the organizer but it's more depressing for the workers."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Christopher Hayes is a contributing editor of In These Times and the Chicago editor of Just Cause magazine.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Brown has long term experience and understanding and is just as progressive on the economic front as
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 2, 2005 5:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bob Casey of PA. Heck, I'd like to see the Democrats snatch the north including the upper midwest away from the Republicans with progressive populism as their goal. That'll teach the GOP to stop taking the north for granted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Middle class issues
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Dec 2, 2005 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On economic issues I'm clearly not just in the mainstream, but in the great majority. The overwhelming number of people think the drug companies, the oil companies and the insurance companies rip Americans off. They don't like the Medicare bill, they want a minimum wage increase and they think our trade agreements hurt our country.
These issues are majority issues because they are middle class issues. The middle class should be in control of the country, not the corporations that finance the campaigns of both parties. Class warfare is a nasty term that Democrats don't like to use but Republicans have used it at least since the days of FDR. They have sold it as the "lazy poor rabble" trying to take the "hard earned money" from the middle class and the "industrious rich". It can as easily be defined as the "greedy, rich corporate class" taking the money from the middle class and "exploited poor". No matter which way you define it the money is taken from the middle class. It is a common belief that both parties are moving to the right and that there's not "ten cents worth of difference between them". If both parties are to be alike, it would be better for us to have them alike in favor of the majority middle class than to be alike on the side of the minority elite. This can be done. To join a non-partisan grass roots effort to take control of both parties click on a new idea. There are no dues, no contributions, no registration, no passwords; completely no hassle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What was Hackett trying to say?
Posted by: chaoslegs on Dec 2, 2005 9:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Article states:

Hackett says that because Brown voted for the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, which expressed "the sense of Congress" that the United States should "support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq" and "promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime," Brown voted for the war. "How do you do regime change without invasion?" Hackett asks. "Did he think Tinkerbell was going to come down from outer space and wave her magic wand? I don't think so. Guys like me have to go in and do that. Sherrod Brown voted for regime change; he voted for military intervention in Iraq."



My question is this, haven't we seen regime change without invasion? Historically, you have civil war, military coups, and fights for independence (1776) that weren't invasions, but military (not all fights for independence were militarily engaged).

Recently we had the challenging of elections in Ukraine as a peaceful regime change based on law.

To me it sounds like Hackett needs to think outside of the military box when it comes to promoting democracy in the world.

I would like to add, that taking the power from corporations that Brown seems to be in favor of domestically, could apply to much of our intrusive foreign/military entaglements of the past century.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re-position Hackett for the re-match; win-win scenario!
Posted by: activist kaza on Dec 2, 2005 4:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've heard that in the wake of the attacks on John Murtha, some were talking to Hackett about running again for the Congressional seat. Is this true, and if so, why not part of this profile?

As a guy who challenged an incumbent in a Democratic primary in 2004, I certainly wouldn't suggest Hackett doesn't deserve a shot at the Senate, and Brown. But this is a lose-lose scenario...either is likely to be a little wounded (and much financially depleted) for the general election vs. DeWine, which makes it an especially hard slog.

Give Brown a break...politicians have personal lives too. His waffling to run is understandable to anybody who has entered the fray - trust me! But Hackett must be a solid bet to beat Jean Schmidt in a re-match and then, voila...the potential win-win scenario prevails.

National Ds and Ohioans who care should be telling Hackett to refocus and reposition for the House seat again and give Brown a clear shot at DeWine. Brown is somebody who no progressive would want to see out of office...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kucinich.com
Posted by: WWW.KUCINICH.COM on Dec 31, 2005 2:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
www.kucinich.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]