comments_image -

More on the British rape statistics

Focusing on the circumstances in which women might get raped removes the rapists from responsibility.
November 22, 2005  |  
 
Advertisement
 

A flurry of activity around the release of an Amnesty UK poll that finds that astonishing numbers of Brits think that a woman is asking for it when she gets raped -- Lakshmi blogged it yesterday, Feministing talked about it, and Echidne had a lot of good words on the subject.

Time to throw in two more cents, and not surprisingly, I suppose, I need to talk about the frame in which raped is addressed. One point is the focus of the victim in this crime situation, and addressing the factors that she has contributed to her crime. As Echidne points out, we don't do this with victims of other crimes in nearly the same degree. A simple substitution exercise shows this in a piece called "The Rape of Mr Smith," in which the victim of a mugging is questioned by police in the same way a rape victim might be:

"Mr. Smith, you were held up at gunpoint on the corner of 16th and Locust?"

"Yes."

"Did you struggle with the robber?"

"No."

"Why not?"

"He was armed."

"Then you made a conscious decision to comply with his demands rather than to resist?"

"Yes."

"Did you scream? Cry out?"

"No. I was afraid."

"I see. Have you ever been held up before?"

"No."

"Have you ever given money away?"

"Yes, of course —"

"And did you do so willingly?"

"What are you getting at?"

"Well, let's put it like this, Mr. Smith. You've given away money in the past — in fact, you have quite a reputation for philanthropy. How can we be sure that you weren't contriving to have your money taken from you by force?"

This brings up the question of framing and what we consider socially acceptable and not within the structures of our understanding. When will we commission studies asking the question of what causes men to rape women? By focusing continually on the situations that women are subjected to rape, we reinforce the victim's "participation" in the crime, and remove the subject -- the rapist -- from responsibility.

George Lakoff has a section in his book "Women, Fire and Dangerous Things" called "Anger, Lust and Rape." In the section, he explores the cultural metaphors associated with lust and violence in American culture, and how they relate to the circumstances under which a man might rape a woman. His findings are extreme yet terribly comprehendible; here's a portion of the summary, discussing a man's description of a situation where he might rape a woman:

There is an important, and somewhat frightening, sense in which his reality is ours as well. We may personally find his views despicable, but it is frightening how easy they are to make sense of. The reason that they seem to be so easily understood is that most, if not all, of them are deeply ingrained in American culture. All of the metaphors and folk theories we have discussed occur again and again in one form or another throughout Beneke's interviews. Moreover, it seems that these metaphors and folk theories are largely held by women as well as men. As Beneke's interviews indicate, women on juries in rape trials regularly view rape victims who were attractively dressed as "asking for it" or bringing it upon themselves and therefore deserving of their fate. Such women jurors are using the kind of reasoning we saw in the passage above.

In light of the horrific statistics provided by the Amnesty study, can we start addressing the cultural standards which allow rapists to act?

Deanna Zandt is a contributing editor at AlterNet, and manages Start Making Sense.
submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Alternet Special Coverage - Occupy Wall Street
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Montana Ban On Corporate Campaigning Heading To U.S. Supreme Court

By Steven Rosenfeld | AlterNet

 
 
$6.2 Million Settlement for Protesters Arrested at 2003 Iraq War Demonstration

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Running Out of Oxygen? Gingrich Loses Crucial Campaign Donor

By Ed Kilgore | Washington Monthly Political Animal

 
 
FBI File Chronicled Steve Jobs' LSD Use

By Hunter R. Slaton | The Fix

 
 
Will Millennials Back Obama in 2012?

By Bill Moyers | BillMoyers.com

 
 
Financial Services Committee Chair Rep. Bachus is Investigated for Insider Trading

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
White House Announces Birth Control "Accommodations" for Religious Groups: Insurance Companies Will Pay, So Women Will Still be Covered

By Jodi Jacobson | RH Reality Check

 
 
Is the Catholic Church Just a Super PAC in Robes?

By Steve M. | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Amid General Strike, 7,000 Protest Austerity in Greece, And Violence Erupts Between Demonstrators and Police

By AFP

 
 
Must-See Video: WA Republican Debates Gay Marriage with Profound, Personal Speech for Equality

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]