Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Resisting Mountaintop Removal in Tennessee

By Kari Lydersen, The NewStandard. Posted November 21, 2005.


A revival of the controversial strip-mining practice is stirring ire and protest from locals in the North Cumberland Mountains.
Advertisement

Appalachian Tennessee, Nov 15 -- Paloma Galindo's chihuahua skittered ahead of her, jumping back in surprise when a small cascade of loose rocks and dirt at the Egan Mountain mine in Tennessee tumbled down a jagged cliff created by the type of mountaintop removal mining that has left the mountains of Appalachia increasingly scarred, pocked and leveled.

Galindo, an environmental activist with the group United Mountain Defense who has come to know the mines of Tennessee like the back of her hand, gestured toward a scrub-covered hillock at the end of a gently sloping meadow, a "reclaimed" strip mine that was once home to lush forest.

"It looks like it's back to its original shape, but it acts like a big sponge," she said of the hillside, which was reconstructed out of rubble after part of the mountain was blasted away to get at coal seams. "It's all broken rock slapped on there and compacted with no hydrological system, so it will soak up water, and five years down the line you'll get massive landslides. Then the mining company will have already bonded out so the cost will fall on the taxpayers."

During a flyover of Egan and other mines in eastern Tennessee and Kentucky the next day, landslides of the type Galindo was describing were visible: gashes of jumbled gray boulders, upended trees and debris cutting through the autumn colors.

From the air, the North Cumberland Mountains in Tennessee look like the coat of a once-beautiful animal with a debilitating case of mange. Mountaintops are laced with strangely shaped bald spots, where trees give way to brushy undergrowth. Giant hunks have been bitten out of the mountainsides, revealing sores of crumbling sand, broken rock and black tar. Once-neat layers of sediment are visibly torn asunder, cascading down hillsides. Strange top-hat-shaped protrusions of land rise up sharply. For miles and miles, it looks as if someone took a giant potato peeler to the side of the range.

And six days a week, fleets of enormous dump trucks and bulldozers crawl along the open wounds of the earth, drilling, blasting and extracting truckloads of shiny black coal.

Even after decades of drilling, digging and blasting, Appalachia is still rich in coal -- 28.5 billion tons of it according to a 1998 US Department of Energy. And coal, in the eyes of the Bush administration, is the energy source of the future. The White House's energy plan designates the black rock as one of the country's main sources of fuel, and calls for 1,300 new coal-burning power plants by 2020. The relative efficiency of strip mining versus the more traditional "deep" mining means that coal companies can harvest more coal faster and with fewer workers.

Setting Up the Battleground

Activists view Tennessee as an important proving ground in the fight against mountaintop removal since the pace of destruction is accelerating rapidly and there are still more state environmental protections in place in Tennessee than in neighboring states. But activists in Appalachia say the environmental and cultural price of powering the country with coal -- especially when it is mined through techniques like mountaintop removal -- is too high.

The harshest effects of mountaintop removal can be viewed in West Virginia, where mining companies have decapitated roughly 300,000 acres of mountains and filled in about 1,000 miles of streams with rubble. Mountaintop removal is also practiced in Kentucky, Pennsylvania and Ohio.

This fall the US Environmental Protection Agency and other federal agencies released an environmental impact statement (EIS) on the effects of mountaintop removal mining. The statement, part of the settlement of a lawsuit filed in West Virginia in 1998, catalogued sundry negative effects of the practice but concluded that better cooperation between federal agencies and a better permitting process could lessen the harm. Environmentalists called the EIS a green light for coal companies to proceed with mountaintop removal.

In Tennessee, the process is officially called "contour mining," when the sides of a mountain are excavated, or "cross-ridge mining," when the peak is shaved right off. They do not call it "mountaintop removal" because Tennessee law mandates the mountain must be "reclaimed" and rubble cleared from the streambeds. However, environmentalists say the process and effects are virtually the same.

In order to reach coal seams in the mountains, mining companies literally blast off their tops. The debris is pushed down the mountainside, creating a "valley fill" at the base, or stored in large piles where it can deposit minerals and ooze toxic metals and compounds into rivers and groundwater.


Digg!

Kari Lydersen is a core contributor contributor to The NewStandard. She is also an instructor for the Urban Youth International Journalism Program in Chicago.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Out of control
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 21, 2005 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corporate America is out of control. Both political parties pass laws that favor industry and commerce that are against the interests of the common citizen. These corporations thrive by passing the big costs of their products on to the average taxpayer. WalMart is not the only villain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Out of control Posted by: maxpayne
Chronic asthma for everybody.....
Posted by: Smiggsy on Nov 21, 2005 10:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the bush policy for future energy is reliant on coal then the guy is seriously derranged (we all know this) & the future health of the environment is seeming evermore f&$#@d. If the USA has serious pollution air problems now just wait until all the proposed coal burning power plants are operating. Chronic asthma for everybody.....

The ONLY single advantage of bush promoting the use of coal for energy is the fact that it is very cost effecitive & cheap compared to any other existing options. With the retail price of electricity ever increasing it only means fatter profits for energy corporations. How much more of a "public criminal" can he get (probably a lot more)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unduna
Posted by: Unduna on Nov 21, 2005 2:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An important, though slightly off topic point, is that these mining communities were at the heart of the democratic vote in TN for decades. They still are, to some extent.
I am a very proud TN mountain girl, not born, but raised in these beautiful mountains, next to a deeply oppressed, neglected and abandoned mining community. The government still owns all the land there, leaving nothing but scars and unbeilevable poverty and desolation. They are all white, undereducated, gun toting, pick-up driving, feuding, music playing, generally racist church-goers. Sounds like Bush territory, doesn't it? Surprise, surprise, surprise! Grundy county fits the Bush demo perfectly, but in fact they were one of only two districts in the entire state where Kerry flat out WON the vote. (Shelbyville was the second one - surprising there, too).
Why? It is a very good question. It has a lot to do with knowing who abandoned them. It has a lot to do with loyalty - an important thing in these parts - to the democratic party. And, having talked to them about it during election season, it has to do with Knowing a Liar When They See One - equally inportant to survival out here.
These guys know more about surving an America that betrays you than we could ever dream of in our present disgust. They have been merely surviving for a while now - and they've got the sense to vote democratic. We need to get on the ground out there and talk to them. What can they teach us about getting the oppressed to vote democratic? Clearly, a whole, whole lot. We need to know how to reach their brothers and sisters around the country. These old mining communities have a story to tell - how is it, when you've lost faith in anything to help you, you still have faith in the democratic party? We need their story to carry the party forward by reaching that "lost" demographic.
Then maybe we could save their (our) mountains and give them back to the men and women who need a living off their land.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Unduna Posted by: kablooie
montana freeman
Posted by: trace on Nov 21, 2005 9:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you know the native americans lived there quite well without tearing the heart out of the earth,what the hell is it with you white people that think nothing about destroying this planet?and everything on it? where you going next? mars? i think you might have already done that one. really pisses me off to no end!!!! the brain deadness of it all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: montana freeman Posted by: Calamitysams@yahoo.com