Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Come Home Again, America

By Terrence McNally, AlterNet. Posted November 21, 2005.


George McGovern, subject of a new documentary, discusses the bright and shining moments of his 1972 presidential campaign and how it changed politics forever.
Advertisement

In 1972 at the age of 23, I packed all my belongings in a used van and drove to Mexico. In the high desert mountains of San Miguel Allende, I created an idyllic life for myself, paying $30 a month to live with other would-be artists and yoga folk, buying fresh produce every day in the mercado. But I still read the International Time Magazine and the International Tribune, and I began to learn about a little-known senator from South Dakota, who was exceeding expectations and actually winning Democratic primaries.

In addition to his pledge to begin withdrawing US troops from Vietnam on Inauguration Day, George McGovern was for universal health care, a guaranteed minimum income, and tax reform. Not only that, his grassroots campaign wasn't controlled by party bosses or professionals.

I couldn't resist. I left paradise and drove back to the States in time to work the last two primaries in California and New York and the convention in Miami. As a reward for my efforts I was given the job of running California's most conservative Democratic assembly district in southeast Los Angeles County, consisting of a few Latinos, a lot of Humphrey-loving unionists and, to the right of them, Wallace folks.

I was asked to win 37 percent of the vote. Without a university, a community college or a single affluent neighborhood in the region, and using a canvassing army of mostly high school students, that's exactly what we did. Unfortunately, that's all the campaign got nationally, losing to Richard Nixon 49 states to one. In our campaign office in Downey, we wept.

A decorated World War II bomber pilot, George McGovern ran the Food for Peace Program under John Kennedy and represented South Dakota for two terms in the House and three terms in the Senate. He's written nine books, including his most recent, Ending Hunger Now: A Challenge to Persons of Faith. The late Robert Kennedy described McGovern as the most decent man he'd ever met in politics. A documentary about the campaign, One Bright Shining Moment: The Forgotten Summer of George McGovern, is now playing in select theaters.

TERRENCE MCNALLY: How did you end up running for president?

GEORGE MCGOVERN: I was a junior senator from a little state with only three electoral votes. I would not have been compelled to get into that race for the presidency were it not for my anguish over what seemed to me to be an outrageously mistaken war in Vietnam. So that was the driving force that brought me into the race.

TM: Nixon had beaten Humphrey in 1968. Though you'd voted for the Gulf of Tonkin resolution, which you say is the decision you most regret in your life, you were an opponent of the war from the start. Was it just that as you looked around prior to 1972, you said to yourself, 'Someone's got to do it'?

GM: That's right. I felt that the case had not been made among the Democratic presidential hopefuls, and that somebody had to do so. We couldn't simply say, 'We're for the war, but we can run it better than the Republicans.' That didn't wash with me and I don't think it would have with the American people. Obviously the Vietnam issue was not the only issue, but it was the transcendent one, and it was tearing this country apart. I honestly believed that until we terminated our mistaken involvement in that war in Southeast Asia, that we weren't going to really be able to address the other problems facing the country.

TM: Your campaign and the reforms the McGovern Commission instituted in the nomination and convention process have been at least partially blamed for the failures of the Democratic party ever since. Is there any truth to that?

GM: It's a total fiction. Those reforms were mandated by the delegates to the 1968 convention. They knew that the party was in a mess -- that what was coming across on television was the picture of a party split across the middle over the war and other issues. Something had to be done to change the way we were picking presidential nominating delegates.


Digg!

Interviewer Terrence McNally hosts Free Forum on KPFK 90.7FM, Los Angeles (streaming at kpfk.org), where he interviews people he believes can help create 'a world that just might work.'

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Lead by example
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 21, 2005 4:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You'd think that nothing had happened.
But it has. The Establishment that Mr. McGovern and the "hippies" were against, the militaryy/industrial complex, has grown and prospered with the blessing of both political parties. Now, as then, it sends us to war and steals our wealth. Instead of spreading Democracy by force we should spread it by example. A "Democracy" controlled by an entrenched establishment is an example that no one would want to follow. "We the people" must take control of both political parties and control the Establishment. Then we will have a system that the world will want to emulate. Click on we can do it

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We are doomed
Posted by: john52 on Nov 21, 2005 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Too many people are not motivated at all to learn or to think about the issues. They are satisfied with their lives and so do not want to make an effort to inform themselves and be active in their democratic government. Their reason is often that there is nothing they can do.
When the pain gets bad enough then they will reconsider whether there is really nothing that they can do. Unfortunately it will be too late then. We are doomed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't lose hope... Posted by: qrswave
END OF DEMOCRACY........
Posted by: pacto on Nov 21, 2005 6:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
YES TERRY I REMEMBER THAT PERIOD VERY WELL.IT FUELED MY DECISION TO LEAVE THE NIXON WORLD.FOR I KNEW THE COUNTRY I LOVED WOULD BE CONSUMED BY THE HATE THE REPUBLICANITES HAVE FOR ANYTHING HUMAN UNLESS THEY HAVE TOP DOLLAR. NOW, LIVING OUTSIDE THE COUNTRY FOR MORE THAN 30 YEARS, I SEE THE RESULTS OF THE PHILOSIPHY OF HATE AND FEAR. UTTER CONFUSION,IT SEEMS LIKE THE U.S. HAS DONE ITSELF IN.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mcgovern may want to tell Democrats in South Dakota
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 21, 2005 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to NOT follow Tom Daschle's self-defeating strategies if he wouldn't mind. Daschle would have won had he not kissed up to Bush too often especially on 9/11 and Iraq war. And how the hell do South Dakotans put up with Herseth and Tim Johnson for caving in to the "right" more often than not?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Human Nature
Posted by: rabblerowzer on Nov 21, 2005 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“The late Robert Kennedy described McGovern as the most decent man he'd ever met in politics.”

That election began my disillusionment for my fellow man. Given the choice between a decent man and a scumbag, Americans overwhelming preferred the scumbag. As we have election after election. McGovern’s decency was apparent to everyone, which sparked contempt and loathing for him. A majority of Americans despise "do-gooders."

Of course, the Establishment feared and hated him and they unleashed a propaganda blitz to discredit him, but that’s no excuse.

Jesus described Human Nature in vivid detail for us, but we continue to ignore his teachings. We have failed to evolve socially because we prefer intolerance, selfishness, greed and hate. That’s not just the Republican credo, that’s Human Nature.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Maryanne Posted by: qrswave
clinker
Posted by: cottontail on Nov 21, 2005 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That this semi-comatose electorate overwhelmingly voted for Nixon and elected Bush twice is a tribute to those two democracy killers, ignorance and stupidity. The dumbed-down Americans will continue to vote for political hacks thereby assuring a dismal future for their kids and grandkids. They are mostly anti-intellectual and prefer good-old-boy types like the god-fearing (so he says) chicken hawk in the White House. It's over!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the 1972 election--a fateful missed turn
Posted by: zooeyhall on Nov 21, 2005 1:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember well the 1972 election, even though I was only 17 at the time, there was a feeling that THIS was a critical moment for our country. And in retrospect that assesment now appears clearer than ever. Here was a chance to change our country---on a fundamental level--for the better. It would have been a chance for our country to finally match in reality the rhetoric we had been espousing all along (and since) about America being a true hope of the world.

Unfortuanately, it seems as if the campaign of McGovern only aroused the most vile instincts of the "silent majority" and the Establishment---people who hated to be reminded of their duty towards their fellowman, that they were their brother's keeper. They were satisfied with their base philosophy that wealth=virtue and poor=laziness and moral laxity. Thus we got Nixon on steroids and Watergate, leading to worse in 1980 with Reagan and now the dark ages of Bush II.

We had our chance in this country, and blew it. Americans have no one to blame but themselves--no one foisted the Republican neo-cons on us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Things have changed! For the worse!
Posted by: Sojourner on Nov 22, 2005 10:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Elections are beauty contests. McGovern is beautiful, but the kind that is obvious only 30+ years later, and that's too long a contest for America's short attention span. Americans would rather die than change. So long as that continues, a lot of us will get our wish.

The initial evidence about Watergate emerged in leftist publications before the election. No one cared at the time. Nixon (I'm not a crook?) was admired for being above the law. Isn't that what Hollywood, tv, and pulp fiction are all about? Power is as power does.

The alternative is saintliness, and even religion (neo-con rightwing, anyhow) avoids any mention of that. Instead, get rich, get power, get fame by coming to church!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]