Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Thomas Paine and Intelligent Design

By David Morris, AlterNet. Posted November 17, 2005.


In Paine's version of 'intelligent design,' science and religion are inextricably linked; in the Kansas school board's definition, they are adversaries.
Advertisement

The Kansas school board might find it instructive to read Thomas Paine's 210-year-old argument in support of intelligent design. They may be interested to learn how his belief in intelligent design led him to reject organized religions.

Why read Thomas Paine? Because, it is widely agreed, without him there would have been no United States. Indeed, it was Paine who first used the phrase, "the United States of America."

For those unfamiliar with American history, a brief review may be in order.

In September 1774, Thomas Paine met Benjamin Franklin in London. Captivated by Paine's passion for democracy, Franklin urged him to emigrate to the New World and sent him off with a flattering letter of recommendation. Franklin may also have been attracted to Paine's passion for science. Like Franklin, Paine was a scientist. He invented the single-span iron bridge and the smokeless candle, and helped to improve the steam engine.

Paine arrived in the colonies in mid-1775. In January 1776, he published his first pamphlet, "Common Sense," a powerful and accessible argument for political independence. As many as half a million copies of the pamphlet circulated. As much as 50 percent of the population of the colonies would eventually either read it, or have it read to them.

Within six months, the Continental Congress issued the Declaration of Independence. Future president John Adams announced, "History is to ascribe the American Revolution to Thomas Paine."

And when British victories and a devastating lack of provisions sapped our fighting spirit, Paine rallied the troops by publishing another remarkable essay, "The Crisis." George Washington ordered "The Crisis" read aloud to the troops. More than 200 years later, the essay's opening lines remain familiar:

"These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph."

Almost 20 years to the day after the publication of "Common Sense," in January 1796, another fiery Paine pamphlet appeared. "The Age of Reason" offered a devastating critique of organized religion. But whereas Paine's attack on British tyranny and his advocacy for political self-determination had made him a national hero, his attack on the tyranny of organized religion and his advocacy for religious self-determination made him a national and international pariah.

Even some of Paine's most vigorous critics expressed astonishment at how quickly and overwhelmingly Paine's peers turned on him. Wrote Reverend Gilbert Wakefield,

"And how transcendently extraordinary...will it be estimated by candid and reasonable minds, that a writer whose object was a melioration of condition to the common people, and their deliverance from oppression, poverty, wretchedness, to the numberless blessings of upright and equal government, should be reviled, persecuted, and burned in effigy, with every circumstance of insult and execration, by these very objects of his benevolent intentions, in every corner of the kingdom?"

Digg!

David Morris is co-founder and vice president of the Institute for Local Self Reliance in Minneapolis, Minnnesota and director of its New Rules project.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
And The truth shall set you free
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Nov 17, 2005 2:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First I need to say this was a great article and truly appreciate learning this. I knew who Thomas Paine was and the revolution, but not this condemnation of him. I wander what Walden thought of him? Another great thinker who did not believe in organized religion, though he was an ordained minister.

As a science teacher over the years when you could get fired for talking about evolution much, I always said to my students that concept of God and the laws of nature do not exclude each other. A good student studies and decides for him or her self what they believe.

The fundamental religions tend to need power over their flocks. You keep them stirred up about stuff like evolution, sex and gay rights, you keep your power to control them. A little examined side bar might be when people are all stirred up and focus that energy thru one person it is really a rush. Ask any Rock star how wired they get just performing.

Science tells you energy follows thought. When those preachers take all that energy and the thought and push it thru a focus, such as gay rights. Those people tend to do really magical thinking. Heavy on the magic part. Metaphysics, magic and witch craft all have this as a spiritual law of the universe. Think about something hard, put a lot of emotional energy behind that thought and things tend to happen. That is what prayer is. A magical formula for getting what you desire. There is no difference between churches and pagan rites. Energy is energy, neither good or bad, it depends what you do with it.

A redwood forest, a mountain top or sitting on a beach can be a mystical experience and you do not need someone else to interrupt it for you, it just is. That is also called science, when you think great thoughts and derive great insights. Your innerself knows the truth and it will whisper it to you at those times you can sit still and listen. Many big science break throughs have been little accidental discoveries.

They have now down a medical study showing people who meditate change their brains, their bodies respond to live longer and they do not have all the medical problems their peer group does, says a front page science article this week.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is stopping you thinking?
Posted by: Rungle on Nov 17, 2005 3:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the first I've read of Thomas Paine, and it is refreshing to see that someone else came to the same sort of conclusion that I have eventually come around to: that if we have a God-given intelligence, then surely it is beholden to us to use that gift. Therefore to try and shut down investigative or independent thought (science, ethics, philosophy, self-determined religious study) would be an affront to God.
Alternatively, if our intelligence is the product of a long evolutionary process, it has either been guided and developed by God (in which case we can go back to the first point), or not. If not, ie God is not involved in the development of human intelligence in any way, the only impediments to using our brains are those placed on us by other people who don't want us to think. And this is where the problem lies: if God gave us brains, God must want us to use them. If God did not give us brains, there is nothing to stop us using them. The only conflict I can see between science and religion is that science undermines the false authourity claimed by those who would use religion to control us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paine and Deism
Posted by: Patrick Murfin on Nov 17, 2005 4:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Paine’s “The Age of Reason” was one of the clearest expositions of Deism ever written. Deism was the belief that a benevolent Creator established the universe and set it in motion in accordance to the laws of nature and then let his Creation unfold without personal intervention or the use of miracles that defy nature. This was sometimes described as the “clock work universe” in which God wound up creation and set it to run on its own. In this belief system God is manifest everywhere in nature, but does not intervene in the affairs of humanity or answer petitionitory prayer. Deism was a common product of the Age of Enlightenment and the privately held religious belief of many Founders including Jefferson, Franklin, George Mason, and Ethan Allen. Even Washington himself never in his long career spoke of “Christ” and seldom of God, but preferred the construction “Providence” or “Creation.” The Free Masonry for which he was famous was at it heart Deism wrapped in mystery and ritual. If Paine had issued “The Age of Reason” during the Revolution it would certainly have aroused wide-spread comment and some condemnation from orthodox pulpits, but it would hardly have resulted in the fire storm that greeted it twenty years later. The reason for the response in 1798 was both political and religious. It came after the French Revolution, famously anti-clerical and Deist to the point of trying to establish a state “Religion of Reason.” The newly emerging Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties were dividing on support of the French Revolution with the Hamiltonian Federalists rabidly anti-French and Jefferson’s Republicans enthusiastic supporters of the Revolution. The denunciation of Deism thus became politically useful to the Federalists. They were already attacking Jefferson as “an atheist” and “The Age of Reason” offered them the opportunity to smear him by association with Paine. Secondly one of the periodic waves of revivalist evangelical enthusiasm swept the country in the years following the Revolution deeply energizing orthodox Protestantism. The religious right of that day, as in our own, found it useful to denounce rational thought as dangerous. Ironically, some modern advocates of “Intelligent Design” for whom that is simply a code for Biblical creation, often use the words of Deists. But make no mistake, they are as opposed to rational religion today as they are to rational science.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

agitator church and state
Posted by: eileenflmng on Nov 17, 2005 6:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FUNDAMENTALISM is driven by fear and ignorance and appeals to those who must have black and white, yes or no answers and are unable to see the beauty in shades of grey and the WISDOM of yes, both and MYSTERY.

"We have it in our power to change the world"-TP

"We the people ALL have to DO SOMETHING to bring that change about."-WAWA


www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dry, dry, dry
Posted by: bettsoff on Nov 17, 2005 6:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'The Age of Reason' was a terrible read. Immensely useful and informative, but terribly dry....

I prefer Mencken. Both have the same views on organized religion, but different views on the existence of a creator.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Science and Religion
Posted by: speedreader58 on Nov 17, 2005 6:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Science can study religion. Indeed religion is well understood thanks to science pioneers like James, Jung and Freud. We know the limiting effect belief has on the brain. We evolved to think abstractly. Abstractions are what we do best. This only becomes a problem when useful abstractions like god, soul or sin are made real. Paul Mclean noted the triune human mind with the three levels reptilian, old mamilian and new mamilian. Abstract thinking occurs in the frontal lobes which only activate at the Jesus age of around 32 years old. Believers short circuit this mode of thinking with a feed back loop through the limbic system. With enough effort they will see what they believe. This type of folly is unlimited. Prime examples of this type of insanity are any TV preacher and the entire Bush administration. No claims of devine support or any of the beliefs of the seldom right wing of American politics are supported by science. The logical end of the current process is the last two humans on earth at each others throats over doctrinal differences. All such claims are simply by brutal killers looking for an excuse to do harm. You have to have more faith in humanity than I to think science will win the battle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Science and Religion Posted by: Basenjis
Preaching to the Choir
Posted by: Pauljaxon on Nov 17, 2005 6:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sadly, the entire argument in my home state of Kansas is not really about science at all--it is about the dominionists taking control. Let's call them what they really are, religious fanatics acting like spoiled children, intent on getting their way, and furious when their perceived entitlement is denied them. Of even sadder note is the fact that my fellow Kansans voted these fanatics into power and continue to vote against their best interests, tricked into believing that they were voting for a "Godly" candidate (whatever the hell that means).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Preaching to the Choir Posted by: Basenjis
Last word on "Intelligent Design"
Posted by: sausage on Nov 17, 2005 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Neil DeGrasse Tyson, director of the American Meseum of Natural History's Hayden Planetarium, in New York, NY., says of "Intelligent Design" in this month's issue of "Natural History" magazine:"What comedian designer configured the region between our legs---an entertainment complex built around a sewage system?"

Nuff said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Real Engineers Posted by: Crazy H
Let's argue; but not about creation.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 17, 2005 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Either the universe was created from nothing by a natural process or it was created by a Creator. Either case ends up in a contradiction. One must assume that God or natural law existed as part of nothing and created everything. Natural selection is well founded but it does not explain the original creation. Religion can claim that a Creator was necessary but can't explain how He (o.k. or She) was created. Maybe someday someone will resolve the contradiction. In the meantime we're here. So let's argue about more practical matters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

democrat - Harvey Kaye
Posted by: democrat on Nov 17, 2005 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those interested in Paine, I hope you will look into my newly-published book: Harvey J. Kaye, THOMAS PAINE AND THE PROMISE OF AMERICA (Hill & Wang). The work treats Paine's revolutionary life & labors, his memory & legacy, and his continuing contributions to the making of American democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

James
Posted by: cynyk on Nov 17, 2005 7:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is interesting to note that Paine's writings are very similar to what I was taught in parochial school when it came to the issue of evolution of the species. Not all religions are against Darwin. The Vatican had acknowledged his theory as legitimate decades ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: James Posted by: Basenjis
Nothing has changed
Posted by: thistleblower on Nov 17, 2005 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thomas Paine makes perfect sense on this topic as far as I'm concerned. But would modern America embrace his utilitarian theology, or string him up? The answer is obvious. Most people haven't changed because their religious leaders terrorize their flock into not even acknowledging the alternatives. The world is run and populated by people who wear superstitious belief systems like a badge of pride. Same old jealous gods (and all-too human, I'll add) making them feel guilty about the simple pleasures of life. Ho hum. Been there, been doing that for far too long! But no, it's doubtful Thomas Paine would have any more receptive an audience (at least on Main Street) now as he did then.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nothing has changed Posted by: BuckFush
Endless debate
Posted by: BuckFush on Nov 17, 2005 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only thing we can know for sure is that there is a power/force in life that is much more powerful than mankind could ever hope to be. Ironically, it is through simple observation that we all can mutually come to this universal, yet stunningly simple conclusion. Observation is a tool of science, not a tool of faith. In general, we form our beliefs based on facts. But we base our hopes on what we wish were true, which is the essence of having faith (no matter what that particular faith is or in what it is invested). This debate is undoubtedly older than anyone can possibly fathom. The only thing we know for sure is we'll find out when the bell tolls for us.

This train of thought continues here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ndless debate Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: ndless debate Posted by: BuckFush
Alternet promotes superstition?????
Posted by: wlybly on Nov 17, 2005 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"God gave us the heavens"??????? What ever happened to The Great Tortoise, or, for that matter Charlie Brown's Great Pumpkin? God is a faith believe, also called a superstition, and there are hundreds of such beliefs extant in the world. If it works for you, and you do no harm, and it helps guide your spiritual growth, then your faith/superstition is a true one. Remember, though, that it has nothing to tell us about physical reality, evolution, the heavens or anything else in the world, except as metaphor.
For a supposedly accurate and progressive reporting service to pose the existence of any superstitious construct (even if it is 'only one person's opinion') reflects very poorly on your objectivity; worse, it makes your service suspect to those of us who have rejected this particular set of superstitions. It is essential that we strip ourselves of our confusion between what we take on faith, however useful it may be spiritually, and what is true in the world. No, Virginia, this is not a democracy and God does not exist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paine's error
Posted by: BlueTigress on Nov 17, 2005 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I believe in one God, and no more; and I hope for happiness beyond this life. I believe the equality of man, and I believe that religious duties consist in doing justice, loving mercy, and endeavoring to make our fellow-creatures happy."

That was his mistake. He didn't espouse a god that would punish you if you stepped out of line as elaborated by your minister.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Children, children, fight nice. How we do love the either/or binaries.
Posted by: Sojourner on Nov 17, 2005 1:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kant argued, persuasively enough to convince me, that no 'proof' of God is possible. Kant was a first-rate logician.

Kant dealt with the Deist/intelligent design (they are two sides of the same coin; the first fascinated by the 'design' the second by the 'designer') argument by showing that it limits your god-concept beyond what is acceptable to normative Biblical views. That is, a designer has to work with the tools that he/she finds at hand, right? A designer must have matter, form, purpose, conceptualizations. Where do those come from? The Biblical view is of an omniscient, omnipotent, onmipresent being. If the folks in KS want a limited God, I won't argue, unless the price is corrupted natural science.

What disappoints me in this thread is the mirror image of dogmatic religion in dogmatic secularism. Friends, just calling each other names: you, humanist, you! you, religionist, you! is only the most recent version of the religious wars that have plagued us forever.

I consider myself a Christian atheist. (Yeah, if you have a day or two, I can make a pretty good case for that.) So far as I can remember what I've read above, none of the politicking above pays any attention to my existence. Thank you. That's what I want. Just let me do my own quiet little religious thing, and I won't bother you, if you don't bother me.

The poem I learned as a child was: "He drew a circle to keep me out--heretic, rebel, thing to flout. But love and I had the wit to win. We drew a circle that took him in."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Persecution And Ultimate Exoneration Of Galileo
Posted by: thirdmg on Nov 17, 2005 2:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Long before Paine there was Galileo, who came under attack by the Inquisition:

I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use. - Galileo Galilei

And here are two recent - and curiously contradictory - Vatican comments on the Church's historic stand against Galileo, quoted from Wikipedia:

On March 15, 1990 Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, today Pope Benedict XVI, said in a speech in Parma: "At the time of Galileo the Church remained much more faithful to reason than Galileo himself. The process against Galileo was reasonable and just."

In 1992, 359 years after the Galileo trial and 350 years after his death, Pope John Paul II established a commission that ultimately issued an apology, lifting the edict of Inquisition against Galileo: "Galileo sensed in his scientific research the presence of the Creator who, stirring in the depths of his spirit, stimulated him, anticipating and assisting his intuitions." After the release of this report, the Pope said further that "... Galileo, a sincere believer, showed himself to be more perceptive in this regard [the relation of scientific and Biblical truths] than the theologians who opposed him."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fact, not Theory; Reason, not Dogma
Posted by: CrouchingGringo on Nov 17, 2005 3:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Kansas Board of Education would be better directed to read a general introduction to evolutionary science, such as Ernst Mayr's What Evolution Is, and contrast that to Kent Hovind's babblings on the same subject. That might give them insight into the true nature of this so-called "controversy."

Thomas Paine's writings and admirable philosophies nonwithstanding, there is no credible scientific evidence supporting a falsifable model of intelligent design that satisfactorily refutes the 150+ years of research and data acquisition since the publication of Darwin's Origin of Species.

The controversy over intelligent design is not about philosophy, science, humanism, secularism, God, or belief. It is about power. The primary argument of the (primarily) Christian Fundamentalist and Evangelicals that evolution constitutes a form of religion, and the teaching thereof constitutes some form of "religious discrimination." This is the tactic of indoctrination by proxy, which is part of their overall war on reason and enlightenment.

It is unfortunate that the legions of the Truly Devout and Pious cannot tolerate a society in which ideas such as evolution, or quantum mechanics, are tolerated as theories, much less taught as fact from one generation to the next. Similarly, rational people cannot tolerate a society in which dogma and superstition are the driving forces behind public policy. Thomas Paine was fortunate to have avoided this conflict through the consolation of his philosophy, but his is a luxury that we can no longer afford.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eschewing KNOWING
Posted by: sculptedbylife on Nov 17, 2005 3:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need a massive infusion of humility, and a swift shift in awareness, which no amount of debate will deliver. ALL 'schools' of thought are limited, and (most) culture is a veritable petrie dish of GIVENS, which is known to be fatal to Innocence.
Science and religion have both been chronically guilty of hubris and elitism......so, viewing the larger picture, there's something moot in the State of Denmark.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reading Paine's "Age of Reason" could very well change your life
Posted by: JTay on Nov 17, 2005 3:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for the enlightened article.

About a year and a half ago I became interested in the beginnings of our nation and set out to read and ponder some of the works of the founding fathers. The Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, inaugural and state of the union adresses, etcettera, but nothing was as life changing as the Age of Reason.

The Age of Reason is absolutely the most powerful treatise on monotheistic belief ever written.

The very foundation of my belief system shifted. From the moment I heard news of arguments concerning the teaching of intelligent design in various schools and communities I made it known to anyone who would listen that if the teaching of intelligent design were permitted in schools across the US, it should be balanced with an in depth reading and discussion of the Age of Reason.

His arguments are sound and lucid. For those who are interested in check out deism.org and discover that many of our founding fathers were adherents; contrary to what the religious right (wrong) might have you believe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hi
Posted by: aser on Sep 29, 2006 3:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
computers archive - computers archive , pc archive blog-pc archive blog ,lan news blog- lan news blog ,laptop blogger info- laptop blogger info ,hardware archive information- hardware archive information ,music blog- music blog ,sound archive news- sound archive news ,stars life blogger news- stars life blogger news ,jazz music blog- jazz music blog ,pop news- pop news ,auto info blog- auto info blog ,cars info provider- cars info provider ,tunning cars fan club- tunning cars fan club ,crash news history- crash news history ,traffic info news- traffic info news ,war location stats- war location stats ,iraq millytary news- iraq millytary news ,iran chemical status- iran chemical status ,hot soldier- hot soldier ,weapon research- weapon research ,continent geography- continent geography ,country finance status- country finance status ,usa location info- usa location info ,uk politics in world- uk politics in world ,mild all about blog- mild all about blog

softlirt-softlirt freware global information ,soft murt- soft murt all soft downloads ,soft odin- soft odin Shareware links ,soft gilt- soft gilt best directory of new Soft ,softer all- softer all os software list

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fg
Posted by: aser on Sep 29, 2006 3:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arts definations-Arts definations firm ,Home dictionary- Home dictionary from loter ,Science dictionary- Science dictionary miscs ,Computer dictionary- Computer dictionary usa ,news dictionary- news dictionary by mark , Shoping dictionary- Shoping dictionary form, Games dictionary- Games dictionary find, Recreation dictionary- Recreation dictionary info, Society dictionary- Society dictionary load, Health dictionary- Health dictionary local, Reference dictionary- Reference dictionary glob, Sport dictionary- Sport dictionary in use, World definations- World definations archive, Psychology definations- Psychology definations list, Biotechnology definations- Biotechnology definations joke, Agriculture definations- Agriculture definations status

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]