Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Bushification of John McCain

By Ari Melber, AlterNet. Posted November 15, 2005.


By striving to prove his conservative Bush credentials to win the Republican base, McCain risks alienating the very Americans he needs to win a general election.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Ari Melber

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Senator John McCain is in a high-profile fight with President Bush over the Administration's torture policy. But even as McCain publicly challenges Bush -- gracing the cover of Newsweek with a personal essay which argues that America's image is at risk -- the 2008 presidential hopeful has also been discreetly working to prove his conservative Bush credentials to right-wing activists.

McCain remembers that his 2000 campaign went down in flames when he ran as a sharp alternative to the left of George Bush. His popularity in the rest of America could not help him; radical conservative activists shut him down in preseason.

McCain won't make that mistake again. Now he's trying to run as the closest thing to George Bush.

It is the "Bushification" of John McCain, and it is awkward.

The bad blood between the two men has been infamous since 2000, when Bush's campaign lied about McCain's family and war service, and McCain told Bush to "get out of the gutter."

But during Bush's reelection in 2004, McCain strained to embrace his former rival -- literally. In their first joint appearance, they hugged dramatically before 6,000 soldiers at a Fort Lewis rally. Those events made for great campaign visuals. Yet while most Americans saw McCain's big heart, Republican leaders saw hungry ambition.

Rich Lowry, editor of the conservative magazine National Review, recently described that campaign bear hug as nothing but proof of "the senator's presidential ambitions." Lowry argues it's just part of McCain's scheme to get "the Right to stop loathing him." In targeted moves since the election, McCain has continued his Bushification by changing positions on conservative priorities like creationism, gay marriage and tax cuts.

This summer, he told the Arizona Daily Star about his newfound support for teaching creationism, (which many evangelicals are now calling "Intelligent Design"). That's a big change from 2000, when McCain declared it was an issue for local school boards -- and found himself outflanked by Bush on the right. The 2000 Bush campaign proclaimed creationism "ought to be taught." McCain may hope this 2005 reversal will be old news by 2008, but the Daily Star's headline still blared that, "McCain sounds like presidential hopeful."

In August, McCain announced his support for a strict anti-gay marriage ballot initiative in Arizona. Arizona state law already bans gay marriage, so the move is mostly symbolic. But it may appease conservative activists, who detested McCain's July 2004 vote against the anti-gay marriage constitutional amendment. Back then, McCain blasted it as "antithetical in every way to the core philosophy of Republicans."

Then in September, McCain delivered a whopper by caving on a key disagreement with Bush: tax cuts.

As the costs of Hurricane Katrina mounted, McCain went on national television and told Chris Mathews the Bush tax cuts must be maintained. But McCain voted against those tax cuts.

In fact, he was one of only two Republicans to oppose Bush's signature 2001 tax cut. Given the surging costs of Katrina, Iraq and Medicare, there is no policy rationale for reversing his position now. The only rationale is political pandering. And that's exactly how some influential conservatives see it. Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, recently said that although McCain has "flip-flopped on a number of issues," he is still "anti-taxpayer" because "he's voted against every tax cut."

Yet the mainstream media is so attached to McCain's maverick image, most journalists didn't cover the tax reversal.

Of course, new positions alone won't turn McCain into George Bush. So McCain has been talking with Bush's message guru, Mark Mckinnon, for some help -- and a 2008 presidential campaign. The Dallas Morning News reported that McKinnon has "committed" to helping McCain in a "second presidential bid."

But do all these moves prove that McCain is pursuing Bushification to appease right-wing Republicans before 2008? How can anyone know for sure?

Just listen to John McCain.

This year he told the New Yorker, "I'm extremely popular -- it's some of the party apparatchiks who still harbor bad feelings toward me. But it is a little hard for them to do that now, because of my strong support for Bush." If that was not clear enough, he touted the early results: "Particularly since the 2004 campaign, there has been a great softening of this dislike for me."

It is rare to see a popular politician mimicking a president with much lower approval ratings. (Bush has crashed into the 30s in several major polls.) Yet as McCain continues his Bushification to win the Republican base, he may alienate the very Americans he needs to win a general election.

Moderate voters were supposedly attracted to McCain's reputation for integrity and independence. If they discover that independence is nothing but a disposable sales pitch from another politician, they may oppose him. McCain must stop pandering to the radical right if he wants to hold the center.

That is why the Bushification strategy is doomed to fail -- you cannot posture a firm ideology for political advantage. You either have one or you don't. And Americans can tell.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Ari Melber served as a national staff member of the John Kerry presidential campaign and as a legislative aide in the U.S. Senate.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It makes me sick to see this proud man have to give to Bush
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Nov 15, 2005 12:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I lived in Arizona for many years and some of those years were rough for people with closing down of the copper mines. You have to be a great person to have that state support you over and over again. I admire his stand on torture and I do feel he is a man of integrity and intelligence. Three more years of Bush many sicken everyone, including the far right. I would not vote for him to be president though. No more Bush like, far right people in our government. My heart could not stand it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Senator Flippy Flop...
Posted by: adp3d on Nov 15, 2005 3:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok, so now let the mudsliinging begin. I can here him now, "...I opposed the Bush tax cuts, then I supported them..., blah blah..."
Liberals need more than a message, we need a hard philosophy. We are the moral majority, lets get government out of our bedrooms. I personally don't know what a "conservative" is, not the party that racks up record spending legislation, not the party that wants the Feds to dictate to local schools...and what is conservative about waging war on the environment, using up every natural resource as soon as inhumanly possible. Isn't conserve the root of Conservative? As in conservation?
How come its moral to lie, cheat, and steal from your own employees but it is okay to have 45 million people going with healthcare, millions of children going to bed hungery every night while Haliburton and Exxon-Mobil are allowed to steal the very food from their mouths? Oh, and don't ever allow two loving and commited individuals have a normal life togather, after all, its a slippery slope, who knows when some bozo may want to marry his tree...

Mike

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Senator Flippy Flop... Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Senator Flippy Flop... Posted by: crusty
Memo to McCain:
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 15, 2005 3:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh Johnny, please! Just go about your buisness in the senate. Be what you were and stop trying to suck up to the half-wits and kooks that comprise "the base". Stop wasting your time, John. There's not going to be another republican president for generations if ever. The First Fool, the disgusting dirt bag that we so laughingly refer to as the Commander in Chief, has so damaged this country that campaigning a member of the GOP the next time 'round will be as fruitless as running as a member of the North American Man/Boy Love Association. Both organizations are on an even keel with respect to their moral worth and I'm not exaggerating, Johnny boy! That is a statement of fact.

It's a pity too, John. Back in 2000, when I was a Democrat (Is it possible that I was once that naive?) I actually supported you in the primaries. That year, when it became obvious that the democrats were going to stupidly nominate Al Gore over the far more qualified Bill Bradley, I actually wrote in your name. How you could even associate with the same people who destroyed your candidacy in South Carolina by conducting a phone campaign, warning the good morons of that state about your "Nigger daughter" is beyond me. How can you even look that child in the eye?

So please, John, knock it off, OK? You're really starting to look foolish.

Pray for peace.
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@froniternet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Huh? Posted by: DrC
» RE: Huh? Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Huh? Posted by: Shehova
» RE: Huh? Posted by: DrC
» RE: Memo to McCain: Posted by: Doubtom
The facts speak for themselves
Posted by: YogiBear on Nov 15, 2005 3:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People may have percieved McCain to be a moderate Republican, but he's always had one of the most conservative voting records in the senate. I think he's just a decent human being who chooses non-partisan issues to speak out on. Anti-torture, campaign finance -- these are not right wing or left wing issues.

Take a gander:
http://www.vote-smart.org/
issue_rating_category.php?can_id=S0061103

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Like All the Others, Now
Posted by: Urstrly on Nov 15, 2005 3:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the reasons John McCain stood out in 2004 was his integrity. His tenacity (together with Russ Feingold's) on campaign finance was one of the few bright spots in a miserable year. I still repect his stand on torture, but if he's going to embrace the rich while this nation is in such obvious financial trouble and attack gays and lesbians, he's headed down a slippery slope from which, let's hope, not even his war record can save him from defeat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Like All the Others, Now Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Like All the Others, Now Posted by: Doubtom
Not much new here
Posted by: DrC on Nov 15, 2005 4:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with Yogi Bear above. McCain has always been a conservative (in fact, until the early 90s, a fairly abrasive and annoying one), and the policies expressed above don't deviate much from his positions throughout his career. What makes McCain respectable is that his conservative rhetoric and voting record doesn't spring from allegiance to maintaining a party line, but instead springs from his own ideological commitments. That's why he's willing to reject elements of the GOP spin machine when it contradicts his belief system. The press has treated him with kid gloves and focused on his differences with his party, rather than his commonalities. This has left liberals receptive to his persona without much understanding of his record. While he's not a neo-con and he'd be preferable to just about any Republican likely to run for President, he wouldn't steer this country in the direction any liberal would want to steer it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Boot-licking toady
Posted by: redstarwraith on Nov 15, 2005 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Mcain was, is, and will likely always remain a boot-licking toady. These are the same republican creeps who used to rail about the "evil empire" and Communism. . .well just look at the (to borrow an old communist cliche)-- the "strict party discipline" these republicans have.
Some might credit this man for his heroism. I don't. I couldn't care less that he fought in the Vietnam War. Yes, he is correct in his stance on torture. . .but dig a little deeper and you can see that he's a functionary of the republicans.
If McCain truly had any cohones, he'd run as an independent and let his principles show untrammeled by republican sentiment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Boot-licking toady Posted by: Gma1
» RE: Boot-licking toady Posted by: Schmedlap
This should come as no surprise
Posted by: sausage on Nov 15, 2005 8:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know why anybody is surprised at Sen. John McCain's political drift toward the reactionary right. Just look at the continuing rightward track of the Democratic Leadership Council toward what they like to call the "vital center." Just the other night on "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" the Senator said that troop strength in Iraq must be increased with the objective of capturing and holding territory, i.e. prolonging the occupation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just go away, McCain
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 15, 2005 8:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What happened to that war hero of Vietnam, the one who stuck by his men in a North Vietnamese prison? After his family and his war record are both savaged by Bush administration lies, he then turns around and licks his tormentor's boots?!

Thanks to his turning wussy, and because of his insistance on spreading ignorance by backing the teaching of that evangelical fairy tale, creationism...oh, sorry..."intelligent design," I have lost all respect for the man. He really does exemplify the phrase, "How can you tell when a politician is lying? His mouth is moving..."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And after the Ohio debacle we're still pretending our votes count?
Posted by: ScottP on Nov 15, 2005 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps you haven't heard about the blatant stolen election in Ohio last week? Take a look at freepress.org if you think they care about what the public wants. Remember, there was no recount in Ohio in 2004, it was a media event staged to look like one for the ignorant masses. Hand picking a few election workers to work with the Republican owned voting machine company to duplicate the computer fraud is not a recount. There will be no recount in 2005, either.

McCain has no chance, the robber barons don't like someone who's a half hearted stooge, they demand the real thing. It will more likely be Senator Hagel, the man who pioneered big time election fraud in Nebraska and stole his way to the senate. Those are credentials that really talk, and he's also a reliable stooge ready to axe every last Sequoia tree if asked to. He'll do some blustery speeches about Iraq strategy, full of self righteous indignation at Bush (after which they'll go backstage and chuckle about how they duped the public). I hear barely a whimper as they drown democracy in the bathtub.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain
Posted by: Meteshah on Nov 15, 2005 9:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wouldn't vote for this person no matter what....he, in my opinion, has no honor, politically speaking, no integrity and he is a republican! Just cause he doesn't like gw personally doesn't mean he is worth a check mark next to his name on the ballot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

C'mon on over to the Dems....
Posted by: enigmafmc on Nov 15, 2005 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are a lot of us who love you

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HE'S FINISHED
Posted by: krose on Nov 15, 2005 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HE'S FINISHED WITH THE LEFT, AND THE RIGHT DOESN'T LIKE HIM! That's what happens when you try to be "all things to all people!" I used to at least respect him, but that respect vanished when he let Bush kiss him on the head while campaigning for him in 2004. He cannot win a presidential election without the support of moderates, and I believe that everyone will see him for what he truly is; a blatant PHONY!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Right Political Culture
Posted by: david.model@senecac.on.ca on Nov 15, 2005 11:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only is McCain sprinting to Bush's political ideology, but democratic hopeful, Hillary Clinton, is running with him stride for stride. The perceived imperative of presidential hopefuls to seek a position on the far right is a dangerous reflection of a political culture which virtually truncates it at the centre resulting in a narrowing of the points of view on the table for debate. The U.S. is the only democratic country that offers the voters such a narrow range of options. Most democracies have a labour, socialist or some form of left-of-centre party whose views are a counterweight to right-wing ideology. The voters then have a real choice. Everything to the right of centre in the U.S. is delegitamized to the point where even the word liberal is a dirty word.

Author of "LYING FOR EMPIRE: HOW TO COMMIT WAR CRIMES WITH A STRAIGHT FACE"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "Most Americans" Posted by: AdamSelene11726
» RE: "Most Americans" Posted by: TagsNOLA
» RE: "Most Americans" and marriage Posted by: montana freeman
» RE: "Most Americans" Posted by: TagsNOLA
» What's the drama? Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: What's the drama? Posted by: TagsNOLA
The GOP; Right, Left, and Center
Posted by: Wyatt8 on Nov 15, 2005 12:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even many Republicans don't understand what is going on behind the scenes at their party. There are distinct philosophical differences in the party characterized by war-mongering, statesmanship, and appeasement. This can be characterized by past and present influences on the leadership in the party. You have the Neo-Cons, "I never met a weapons system that wasn't good for America". You have the Goldwater Republicans, "deficits, waste, and corruption are the enemies of every American". And finally, you have the Rockefeller Republicans, "America is fundamentally an inclusive nation that respects the rights of all peoples".
Sen. McCain has taken many positions that appeal to the majority across the spectrum of his party and indeed across the majority of the electorate. Unfortunately, the Neo-Cons have such a tight grip on the mechanisms of government, he feels he has to move in that direction. He is not alone, as you see Hillary Clinton also has moved to the right of her party, and Senators Nelson and Leiberman are prepared to totally jump ship and join the Republican Party to keep their seats.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain Should Have More Sense.
Posted by: SanFranDuke on Nov 15, 2005 12:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain should have more sense than to cater to the so-called "Christians." It is time we told them that they do not run our country.

Write John McCain and tell him to become HUMAN again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Say it isn't so...
Posted by: freemind on Nov 15, 2005 3:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could it be that I've bought into the hype as well? My feeling about McCain was that he was an independent thinker, unafraid to disagree...on principal...with orthodox Republican positions. Buck up John! Don't squander the good will people of conscience feel about you. John McCain no longer speaks his mind? Say it isn't so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John McPain
Posted by: williameon on Nov 15, 2005 5:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John:
The WAR Criminal!
Is a SHAM!
Rained Bombs down:
On Viet Nam!

Killed 2 Million
Anonymously,
Antiseptically:
From the Sky!
Now he sells: War Profiteering lies!

A salesman for;
Death and destruction
An example:
Of everything that is:
Wrong with this country!

Now:
Forty years later;
Just:
A Brian-Washed: Wreck!
A Pawn!
Of the:
War Profiteers!

Lulled to sleep!
By a promise:
A chance:
To be: King!

Himself a Victim of:
WMD
&
Gulf of Tonkin:
Lies!

He spews Bush-isms!
More: War!
More: Lies!
More: TREASON!

For all the wrong:
Reasons!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: John McPain Posted by: reinaldok
Presidential hopes
Posted by: BlueTigress on Nov 17, 2005 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He should stop wasting his breath. The Bush Family Evil Empire (BFEE) will never let him into the top slot as long as they hold power. Jeb is next.

Plus, a lot of paleo-cons and moderates have quite had it with Bush's continuous screwups, so they will not be in a hurry to support the nomination of someone who echoes him publicly. I think he would be better served by sticking to his original positions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]