Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Time to Target Wal-Mart

By Robert L. Borosage and Troy Peters, TomPaine.com. Posted November 15, 2005.


Wal-Mart's size, policies and politics have become major threats to America's well-being, and it's time to strike back.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Wal-Mart must feel like a piñata these days -- everyone's lining up to take a shot at it. This week, 7,000 house parties are being held to screen Robert Greenwald's blockbuster documentary, "Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price." The inspector general of the Labor Department censures its sweetheart deal that promised to give Wal-Mart notice before any future investigation of illegal child labor practices. Legislators from the L.A. City Council to the U.S. Senate are introducing legislation to curb the giant's public subsidies. Communities are rejecting Wal-Mart's demands for subsidies and zoning exemptions. Right-wing groups are furious Wal-Mart is taking the Christ out of the Christmas holidays. It's gotten so bad that Wal-Mart has created a war room staffed by veterans of political campaigns to wage the PR battle.

Why Wal-Mart? For one thing, it's hard to avoid. It is the world's largest private corporation, employing more than 1.6 million "associates" worldwide -- more people than Ford, GM, GE and IBM combined. The company serves 138 million customers per week worldwide and has outstripped any competitor. In 2004, it pocketed $10.3 billion in profits, on sales of $285 billion, more business than Target, Sears, Kmart, J.C. Penney, Safeway and Kroger combined. There are upward of 3,800 Wal-Mart stores in the United States today, in addition to nearly 1,600 locations in countries from Mexico to China. Wal-Mart alone is China's eighth-largest trading partner. It accounts for over 10 percent of our annual trade deficit with China, with over 70 percent of its products made in China.

If Wal-Mart's size is a problem, its policies are a threat. Wal-Mart is the model "low-road" corporation in the global economy. Its efficiency is celebrated; but its exploitation is caustic. The average pay of a Wal-Mart employee is $8.23 per hour, or an average yearly income of $14,000 -- not enough to lift a family out of poverty. Wal-Mart is infamous for requiring workers to work overtime off the books. It's been cited for locking workers in plants overnight. The company has been hauled into court for discriminating against female employees. And it is viciously, rabidly anti-union, crushing any attempt by its workers to organize to gain a fair share of the profits they help generate.

But Wal-Mart doesn't merely follow the low road; it drives its suppliers and its competitors into the same race. When Wal-Mart comes to town, it purposefully wipes out small mom-and-pop stores, leaving small towns looking like they were hit by a neutron bomb -- buildings intact, but people gone. Wal-Mart also undercuts big competitors that have unions and pay decent wages and benefits. They must slash wages, cut back on benefits or hang it up.

Given its size in the United States, Wal-Mart is a major force in driving wages down and forcing cutbacks in benefits. It is a central reason why we have an economy in which CEO salaries are up, stocks are up, but wages are down.


Digg!

Robert L. Borosage is co-director and Troy Peters is policy fellow at the Campaign For America's Future.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
agitator church and state
Posted by: eileenflmng on Nov 15, 2005 4:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Facts well stated but the point is capitalism is the engine and consumerism the steam that drives that train.

So the right wing is up in arms becasue Walmart "is taking Christ out of Christmas."
As there is nothing Christian about capitalism and consumerism, this Christian finds their demonizing of Walmart as jumping on the bandwagon, not changing the wind.

Want to do something about Walmarts corporate greed?
Don't shop there.

www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Something else to do
Posted by: knitter on Nov 15, 2005 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In addition to " don't shop there," we need to be aware of the people who do not see any alternative place to shop. People with the means to shop elsewhere are doing so in increasing numbers. We need to expand our vision to recognize the people whose options about where to shop are limited.

Does anyone know of creative community solutions that are working to keep smaller businesses from being annihilated by the "neutron bomb" of Walmart blowing into town? I'm thinking that resale shops and sliding scale groceries might figure into that. I'm thinking of coupons for low income families, the saving of which would be paid for by better-off families voluntarily picking up the tab. This would allow the store to remain in business and give decent prices that afford for decent wages and yet be affordable to the citizens of the community.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WalMart the whipping boy
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 15, 2005 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WalMart is in the unfortunate position of being the focus or the personification of an evil. The evil is not WalMart but the too powerful corporations whose "civil rights" are put above human civil rights by both political parties. To cure this ill we have to take control of both political parties and force them to take a stand on corporate rights vs. human rights. It can be done before the 2006 election. Click on a new idea

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WalMart the whipping boy Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: WalMart the whipping boy Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: WalMart the whipping boy Posted by: Doubtom
funny but.....
Posted by: crusty on Nov 15, 2005 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are two walmarts in a town nearby and there still seem to be plenty of places for people to shop. thing is I guess the population of this area is pretty keen on a local economy which in my humble opinion is the most important thing that we can strive for. WIth a strong local economy comes true security. Money stays in the community more when the economy is based on local businesses. There are alot of chains and corporate stores restaurants around here, but people tend to keep it fairly local... hopefully it can last. Make it happen in your community!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is Capitalism, stupid!!
Posted by: Brucewxx on Nov 15, 2005 6:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why beat up War-mart when the capitalism is the hallmark of USA? Do you think the poor people who makes below avarage pay in US will listen to you? Without War-mart, those americans would be like the poor people in the third world county as the money they are making could not afford them much at all. You can see War-mart gets bigger after each recession as more Americans are squeezed out of their comfortable middle-class rank AND still think THEY ARE MIDDLE-CLASS and want to enjoy all of the good stuff. War-mart is the result of America's national policy, not the other way around! You think the people on Wall Street and any other corporations are any different? They all want to make more money themselves and want to pay the people working for them the least as long as they can get away from doing so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about targetting "Target" ?
Posted by: SDres11 on Nov 15, 2005 6:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
» Shop elsewhere. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» The pharmacists "job"... Posted by: ABetterFuture
Course correction
Posted by: knitter on Nov 15, 2005 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When a corporation gets the spoken approval of the administration as a model for American businesses to follow, as it did when Vice President Cheney met with Walmart officials, then it is time for Americans to speak up and say, "No, this isn't the model American company."

Yes, it is the model capitalist company, and it shows the logical outcome of pure, unregulated market capitalism. Capitalism and its opposite, communism, are both economic models for understanding our world. Neither of them call forth the best of what is human. Either of them can be used as limited tools for helping to organize how we exchange our work for goods. If instead, they are regarded as the absolute organizing principle, that leads to the system abusing the society it is meant to serve.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Solutions?
Posted by: Guy on Nov 15, 2005 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The question is: what are we going to do about it. This article rehashes all the stuff we already know about Wal-Mart. What it doesn't do is suggest any action to change things.

I have always shopped locally. Preferring spending my money at places that will keep the money in the community whenever I can, even if it costs a few dollars more. We can start by all doing that. But beyond that, we need to have a plan. I see our local downtown shriveling up under the competition from the major chains. If we want our downtowns to full of vibrant local businesses that pays decent wages, then we need to put out money where our mouths are.

The author should make some suggests rather than just whining about Wal-Mart like everyone else.

Guy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wal-Mart is the temple of greed.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 15, 2005 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The strongest and most widespread religion in America is not Christianity; it is the over-worshipped mythology of "free trade." The fact is, with the existence of aggressive near-monopolies like Wal-Mart, there is no such thing as free trade. Our insistance in believing that fairy tale while disregarding massive evidence to the contrary keeps us chasing the carrot on the end of the corporate stick, and keeps us from seeing how the phony (and rigged) "free market system" keeps us lashed to a destructive and unjust system. Real progress cannot be made until people open their eyes and see who's cracking the whip.

If our government is as serious about curbing welfare in this country as it claims, it had better take Wal-Mart off the welfare rolls, and return some of that money to Wal-Mart's "associates" –– after all, THEY earned it, not the overpaid, overfat, uber-greedy Walton family.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't worship there Posted by: knitter
Wal-Mart
Posted by: Meteshah on Nov 15, 2005 9:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Didn't Wal-Mart donate enough to the republican political engine?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fed up
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 15, 2005 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is obvious that most people in this forum believe that WalMart is only a symptom of problems. The problems, to name a few, are corporations out of control, elections bought with campaign contributions, decline of businesses run by local middle class businessmen, exportation of jobs, choking the unions and probably dozens more. These issues, harmful to the middle class, are not being solved by either party. It is the parties who are at fault. Candidates come and go but the parties live on. To fight this situation we the people must take control of both parties and force them to decide these issues in favor of the citizens Click on we can do it

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To really deal with the Walmart issue, we need to get to the people who work and buy there
Posted by: Caroll Fowler on Nov 15, 2005 11:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree completely about all the issues, complaints, unfair practices, etc. that we read about Walmart. My problem in finding a way to combat this is that 1) many people who work there, even with the low wages, have a very difficult time finding other work; 2) many of the people who buy from Walmart, cannot afford the same thing at different stores. Walmart provides a place to buy almost everything you want and busy, low paid families, find Walmart a find for their living in America. How can we get these people to go somewhere else. I recently traveled by car in the Southwest and some towns were a gas station, an auto store and Walmart.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to target the American Empire and Capitalism in general
Posted by: Global Fallujah on Nov 30, 2005 11:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article from Robert L. Borosage and Troy Peters is typical of the deceptive tripe pushed by America's phony progressives.

Like most American liberals, they focus only on the symptoms of the problem and carefully try to cover up the more fundamental issues: namely, the American Empire and the capitalist system in general. Worst yet, I suspect their real agenda is a thinly disguised form of American economic nationalism, of the type pushed by the AFL-CIA and other US labor imperialists.

Wal-Mart is merely a by-product of Capitalist globalization, whereby American, Western, and First World corporations expand around the world in order to exploit Third World labor (such as in China or Mexico) and to penetrate local markets in other countries, thereby destroying indiginous businesses that cannot compete with American multinationals.

Capitalist globalization, however, is being driven, pushed, and enforced first and foremost by the American Empire. This is done both multilaterally through figleaf organizations such as the WTO, IMF, and World Bank which the USA uses to impose privatization policies on the Third World. America also pushes capitalist globalization unilaterally through the various free trade deals such as NAFTA, CAFTA, and the Free Trade Zone of the Americas.

All of these predatory policies are inflicted by the American state using all the powers of the American Empire at its disposal. These powers even include the use of American spy agencies to destablize and overthrow any government that adopts policies which resist American capitalist penetration and colonization.

For a better and more truthful analysis of how capitalist globalization works, read John Perkins' book Confessions of an Economic Hitman where he exposes in uncensored terms America's "hidden fist" behind the reality of globalization.

John Perkins Interview
Economic Hitman

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to target the American Empire and Capitalism, part deux
Posted by: Global Fallujah on Dec 1, 2005 1:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One could ask the question do Borosage or Peters oppose the USA Empire or the capitalist system?

The answer is of course not. In fact, they tacitly support the US Empire and the profit system by trying to narrow the terms of debate to easy individual targets.

The issue that Borosage and Peters would rather not talk about is that their beloved American "well-being" has always been based upon the exploitation of the Third World. That's the basis of America's way of life since the first slaveowners put their bloody boot on this continent.

And behind their "progressive" mask, Borosage and Peters are not much different from the reactionary nationalists one finds in unions like the AFL-CIA, who specialize in chauvinist rants about "foreigners stealing our jobs" or foreign competition.

With respect to China, for example, Borosage and Peters state that Wal-Mart "accounts for over 10 percent of our annual trade deficit with China, with over 70 percent of its products made in China."

What they forget to mention is that many of the USA's "imports" from China are not even made by indiginous Chinese firms, but rather by the subsidiaries of American, Western, and other international corporations that set up production in China to exploit labor and ultimately export their products back to the US market. Those products may literally be "made in China," but they are often made by and for American and other multinational corporations who either own or have ownership shares in the factories. Guess who gets the most profits from this setup?

This is similar to the maquiladora system in Mexico where many US corporations relocate to exploit labor and then ship their manufactured products back to the US market for US consumers. They call that an import from Mexico, but it's glorified *intra-business trade* that reaps superprofits for USA capital.

The beneficiares of globalization are thus First World nations like America, whose corporations often own the factories in the Third World to begin with and make dollars for every penny spent on labor costs and whose consumers who pay less for products that would otherwise cost more.

Wal-Mart is symbolic of capitalist globalization, so why don't Borosage or Peters question capitalism itself? Because this system is ultimately the bedrock of the American way of life and well-being they champion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]