Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

It's Obstruction Time

By Stephen Pizzo, News for Real. Posted November 15, 2005.


We know now that George W. Bush is not trainable. What we see is what we get -- and that's exactly what we're going to get for three more years unless we stop him.
obstruct
An obstructionist at work.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Stephen Pizzo

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

I spent the long weekend thinking about damage control. No, not the countless damage control operations underway within the Bush administration now. I was thinking about what we, the nearly 60 percent of Americans who believe President Bush is doing a bad job, are going to do now.

Bush has three more years at the wheel. How are we going to keep this guy from creating any more messes we, our children, and our grandchildren will have to clean up?

I'm serious. We need a damage control strategy, and we need one fast. I wrote a piece many months ago entitled "Obstructionists of America, Unite!" I suggested that sometimes obstructionism can be the passive-aggressive exercise of true patriotism. But the idea must have been launched too soon, because the response to that piece was underwhelming.

Not now, though. If ever there was a time to employ massive obstruction, it's now. After all the damage the Bushites have already done, are we really going to just let these Typhoid Marys continue infecting everything they touch, everything Americans hold dear?

I proposed back then that House and Senate Democrats stop running from Republican charges that they are being obstructionists, and instead turn obstructionism into a virtue. When Republicans accuse them of obstructing administration plans, programs or appointees, instead of launching into some convoluted, triangulated response, just thank them for the compliment.

Then use the opportunity to ask them why, in light of the administration's abysmal track record, they are not helping obstruct this out-of-control wrecking operation. In case they forgot, or weren't paying attention the last five years, hand them this list:

First-term Damage Report

  • They blew the Clinton $5.6 trillion surplus
  • Cut taxes by nearly $2 trillion benefiting mostly wealthy earners
  • Ran up national debt to over $8 trillion -- and growing $3.5 billion a day
  • Created record high energy prices and record high earnings for energy companies
  • Started a war on false pretenses
  • Global warming is on a tear (just ask the folks in Florida and Louisiana.)
  • Treats real scientists the same way the Catholic Church treated Galileo.

And he's not done. We know now that George W. Bush is not trainable. What we see is what we get -- and that's exactly what we're gonna get for three more years unless we stop him. Under our system of government, the only legal way to stop a sitting president is to block his every move and abscess him off from the body politic.

We must especially stop him from creating damage that will persist long after he's finally out of our hair. That means stopping him from stacking the Supreme Court with right-wing Christian fundamentalists. The confirmation of Judge Samuel Alito is certain only if Democrats allow it to come to a vote.

WASHINGTON, Nov. 13 -- A coalition of liberal groups is preparing a national television advertising campaign against the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. that seeks to move the debate over his selection beyond abortion rights and focus instead on subjects like police searches and employment discrimination, several leaders of the coalition said. (Full Story)

Digg!

Stephen Pizzo is the author of numerous books, including "Inside Job: The Looting of America's Savings and Loans," which was nominated for a Pulitzer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Gee, That would be Great, I do not think the Democrats are up to it yet.
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Nov 15, 2005 12:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like everyone else writing on AlteNet would really support that happening. I think we have to let them get their sea legs first, so to speak. We need to encourage them to do that by emailing your wishes to them. You saw how the Arctic drilling amendment did not pass. That was a lot of letters and petitions sent over the past year. Calling our congress members to tell them what we wanted. Tom DeLay sent me nice automatic responses. Texas two senators are hopeless, but I do write other states congress people. Rome was not built in one day and this obstructionism will take a little longer with a lot of work. I really like empeaching Bush and Company. We can demand that with different methods that are going on right now. Support those who are working so hard to get rid of Bush and Cheney.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good Idea, How do we DO It?!
Posted by: ~Fiona~ on Nov 15, 2005 2:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yet another "Bushwhacking" is in progress this very day as millions of American Seniors are forced to choose a drug plan from a bewildering assortment of so called "drug plans" which are nothing more than just another scheme to make "Big Business" even richer... I saw a cartoon today suggesting the administration was on drugs when this new program was proposed, but its just another way to steal from the poor and give to the rich... Meanwhile its more smoke and mirrors...

So much of this administration is like watching Pee Wee Herman reruns as it announces time after time when confronted, "I know you are, but what am I???" as it accuses any who oppose its lunacy of "rewriting history"... This is a tactic the bushwhackers have excelled in since their earliest days in office... I'm tired of being a victim and want to DO something, so rather than just read more and more about the need to do it, please tell us HOW to DO it...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» See My Post above, and below Posted by: qrswave
» Through the front door and the back Posted by: Bic Pentameter
HOW to do it? do something and here's a plan
Posted by: eileenflmng on Nov 15, 2005 4:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democracies only flourish when we the people are vigilant, actively involved and hold politicians to their promises, agreements, resolutions and road maps.


"In the long run, there is no justice without FREEDOM. There can be no human rights without LIBERTY. All who live in tyranny and hopelessness can know the United States will not ignore your oppression or excuse your oppressors. When you stand for liberty, we stand with you."-President George W. Bush, Second Inaugural Address

The universally accepted definition of insanity is persisting in the same action expecting a different result.

This Administration is fighting terrorism with terrorism.
No matter who wears the uniform, or how noble they believe their cause, every innocent life that is caught in the crossfire of war knows terror!!!

Estimates vary from 30,000 to over 100,000 Iraqi's have been killed by USA actions.

If we want change 'we the people' must rise up and demand politicians honor their words, speeches, Resolutions and Road Maps.

read more on WAWA:
www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OK ---BUT
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 15, 2005 4:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I go along with this as far as blocking a supreme court nomination, but no further. It would be a dramatic movement that would go down in history. But, it would have negative effects. There would be a tremendous backlash. While the administration and Bush personally have lost popularity, they still have and always will have the right wing press and the rich and powerful Establishment behind them. It wouldn't them take long to convince people that the Democrats are scuttling the "ship of state" for political gain. The unpopularity of the administration is the only thing that we Demcrats have going for us. Don't make Bush the "victim of wild eyed liberal, lefty, pinko, socialists". A better plan would be to use the administration's low ratings to elect a Democratic Congress next year. Not as dramatic, but more practical.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: OK ---BUT Posted by: Pepper
» You are on the wrong track Pepper Posted by: Lincoln fan
The problem with
Posted by: crusty on Nov 15, 2005 6:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The list of what is "patriotic" is that patriotism has taken on a new meaning in this land... Patriotism means to follow a leader no matter what they say... Hence the Bush doctrine of "Youre either with us or against us". It is too bad that we have so many that blindly follow this leadership and claim that they are patriotic....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm all for it.
Posted by: jverner on Nov 15, 2005 6:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was for it when you floated it the first time. But we need some leaders with guts, and other than Reid, I don't see any.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm all for it. Posted by: Pepper
lAURA
Posted by: lasap on Nov 15, 2005 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it's a great idea! I think, we, as the people, have to continue more protests in the streets, keep writing our Senators and Congressman, and insist that they stand up to this Regime! We also, somehow, have to have the TV news stations involved.....show the protests and everything....probably Faux News would call us Commies, but I think that even they are obligated to show it....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Better red than dead?
Posted by: rabblerowzer on Nov 15, 2005 7:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Repugs had no qualms about rigging the last two elections, so why would they hesitate to do it again in 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, etc. Since the Rabid Right now controls all three branches of government, what legal recourse do we have if they choose to eliminate elections altogether?

Even after five years of lies and total corruption, many Americans still have faith that democracy will prevail, but what if it doesn’t? Every passing day the Repugs increase and consolidate their power. Don’t underestimate the Rabid Rights’ determination to fundamentally change America. Look at what they have accomplished since the sixties. Many of the rights and opportunities we once took for granted have been abridged and over turned by deceit, deception and stealth.

Perhaps enough Americans have had second thoughts about this administration and congress to vote for change, but suppose the Repugs once again thumb their nose at the will of the people and declare martial law? All they need do is start another war to justify this step. We could end up with Bush as dictator for life.

I fearfully doubt that even a minority of Americans are willing to risk civil war to avert a dictatorship. Better red than dead?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Better red than dead? Posted by: CyberChas
Stephen, Please read this request!
Posted by: cstriker on Nov 15, 2005 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of us know what needs to be done, but many are not aware of the methods by which we can truely get involved. We feel powerless in the task. Mainly because we are stuck working to make ends meet and don't have time to go out protesting.

A couple of suggestions.

1. Publish an article on how we can get bills entered into congress.
2. Publish organizations that are working to meet the goals you discussed in your article, including ways John Q. Public can help those organizations without taking food off the table.
3. Find an organization that is willing to petition the parties to force them to drop candidates that voted for war, or vote for torture, destroying the environment, breaking the little guys back, etc...

Just a few suggestions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

doodles
Posted by: doodles on Nov 15, 2005 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amen. OK, I've tried every other way I know how to get the Dems to understand that the Repubs can't change the rules of the Senate and so far no one is listening. Maybe someone hear will tell me why an Application for a Writ of Mandamus and Request for a Temporary Restraining Order (restraining the Senate from any votes on judicial nominations until the Court rules on the constitutionality of any one person changing the rules of the Senate) with a fill-in the blank with the name of whatever Repub decides to chair during a fillibuster over Alito's nomination. Grounds: Only the Senate may change the rules of the Senate (Constitution). The Senate rules require 60 votes to change the rules. A ruling from the President or Acting President of the Senate stating that fillibustering a judicial nomination is "unconstitutional" is illegal in that it changes the rules of the Senate without the consent of the Senate. Seems a slam dunk to this former legal assistant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"What can we do?" you ask?
Posted by: iamdazey on Nov 15, 2005 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just scrolling through the comments here, I have noticed some folks asking, as I have asked many times, “Yes, we have major problems, but what can we DO about them?”

Personally, I think the biggest problem that we as individuals face is that we see all the problems we face as a country as this huge, insurmountable obstacle, and we have no idea how to tackle that on our own.

But here is a simple fact that most people forget: take it one problem and one step at a time. Don’t look at this huge mountain and think that you’ll never be able to climb it. Instead, think about the first step you need to take to get you started.

Since no one is really telling us what to do, and no one is calling us to arms, so to speak, I have a couple of suggestions that almost anyone can do:

1. Become an informed citizen. Research everything yourself, using multiple resources, this way all you say is based upon FACT. (AlterNet, as refreshing as I find it, isn't the only thing you should be reading.)
2. Talk to people. The majority of Americans are under-educated about what's happening in our country, and you might inspire them to know more.
3. Write to your representatives, your senators, your congressman and the newspapers every time you have something to say. (Links below.)
4. Find and join a political organization in your area that fits you. Or create one and see what you can do when you work with others.
5. Write to companies and organizations whenever they do something you like, or something you hate, right along with the newspapers. Public opinion is important to any business, and we should use that to our advantage.
6. Also, we are swayed by the almighty dollar, which gives you a lot of power as a consumer, so use that to your advantage as well.

Obviously, this isn’t everything but there are a few good places to start. But my point is that yes, there is a lot that needs to happen for this country to be set to rights, but it IS possible. The trick is to take it one step at a time, and it needs to start with you.

Here are some links, if you dig that sort of thing:
House of Representatives
Senate
Congress

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "What can we do?" you ask? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: "What can we do?" you ask? Posted by: iamdazey
» RE: "What can we do?" you ask? Posted by: Lincoln fan
sauce for the goose
Posted by: gerdhansel on Nov 15, 2005 11:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, okay, the Democrats choose to filibuster every Bush initiative until the cows come home, and red-staters and blue-staters end up at each other's throats, what do you think the Republican response will be when Hillary gets elected in 2008?

They will be plenty mad by then, and you can bet that they will take revenge by obstructing every move the Democratic president makes.

So we get into a vicious pattern where the party out of power obstructs everything the party in power proposes.

Isn't that what the Republicans did to Bill Clinton? Wasn't that great for the country? Hoorah, hoorah.

The last time the U.S. Congress was so hostile and polarized, a Senator from South Carolina brutally caned a senator from Maine. What was that, about 1958?

And just how did that little obstructionist spat end up? Can you say Civil War? Repeat after me, Civil War.

The best you can hope for is a Democrat takeover of the House in 2006. You'll need a Great Depression or a super-Watergate to pull that one off. So you win the House, pass Articles of Impeachment against Bush, then what?

Remember only a third of the Senate is up for reelection every two years. You'd never round up the two-thirds vote required to convict a sitting President. Remember Bill Clinton, "best bring some Kryptonite next time you take me on?"

Another unsuccessful, divisive Impeachment proceeding. Boy that would really unite the country. Are you really ready for this country to split into two or three separate countries?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sauce for the goose Posted by: Lincoln fan
» Hilary Should not be President Posted by: cstriker
» And she still supports.... Posted by: cstriker
Backbone.
Posted by: SanFranDuke on Nov 15, 2005 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Is Congress going to get some Backbone? When are we going to stop the Republicans from controlling even the most compelling of actions? When are we going to close down Congress? When are we going to stop the so-called "Christians" from dictating even who will be on our Supreme Court?

The answer, my friends, is when the American people recognize that they made mistakes in allowing the Republicans control both the Hill and the White House. That's two thirds of the government, guys!

You know I wouldn't even be above impeaching both Bush & Cheney for treason or anything else. We don't dare just impeach Bush because Cheney is worse.

At least it would give the so-called "Christians" something more to worry about than controlling our schools. We could also call for hearings in both Houses about the mess FEMA has made in the South. The South HATES FEMA! The Republicans need the South to win in ought six.

Tell Congress to DO SOMETHING!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The history of obstructionism
Posted by: dkm on Nov 15, 2005 12:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back when Gingrich was running high, he tripped and fell when he played chicken with Clinton over passing a budget. It seems from history that obstructionism works sometimes and backfires sometimes. I'm not sure what the difference is, but maybe it has a lot to do with how the situation is "framed." Other people surely have other suggestions about why sometimes obstructionism works and sometimes not.

In any case, surgical obstructionism is probably a lot more effective than blunt force obstructionism so it seems that it would be better to pick fights rather than reflexly object to everything. The criteria on which the fights are picked do not necessarily include whether or not a particular fight can be won, but rather whether fighting it gives you a higher moral standing in the eyes of the public including the rest of the world. Even going down to defeat may earn the other side a Pyrrhic victory so that they are fatally weakened for the rest of the war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The history of obstructionism Posted by: squadsright
» Positive action Posted by: Lincoln fan
Thank You
Posted by: ~Fiona~ on Nov 15, 2005 3:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wanted to say "Thank You" for your suggestions... I have bookmarked both sites and will take a look at them as soon as I post this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dumb idea
Posted by: icebox on Nov 15, 2005 3:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just remember what happened when the Republican-controlled congress chose to allow the government to shut down in the 90s rather than pass Clinton's budgets. The country turned against them in a heartbeat and they had to, egads, compromise. If the Democrats try to shut Congress down, they will instantly lose the political capital they have gained in the last year. So their failure to use obstructionist techniques has been a matter of sanity more than wimpiness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OUR Liberty to remove him is our by Law
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Nov 15, 2005 3:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I ran for Governor of Wisconsin a good friend of mine handed me a book and said " Learn this, it is the kind of speak they use in government and if you want to get anything done you'd better know it." That book was The Black's Law Dictionary, Harvard Edition. In this fine book stands the definitions of Liberty,all of which are ours as Americans. The most powerful,and least used,of our Liberties
is the Political Liberty. It gives us the right to remove anyone from any office at any time. That's right my friends,WE have the power to FIRE Dub,Dick,Rummy,Rice and the whole lot TOMORROW! To exercise OUR LIBERTY, WE HAVE TO LIVE IT.
When the framers of the Constitution and The Declaration of Liberty said we had the right to Liberty,they ment Liberty in ALL OF IT'S DEFINITIONS. Our willingness to believe our representitives are working for our best intrest has led us all to a cesspool. It's time for the People to lead so the leaders can learn to follow.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CHANGE TAKES HARD WORK, HEART AND LOTS OF SWEAT
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Nov 15, 2005 4:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I sound like a broken record I guess and you have to work to change things and it will take time. It took the Republicans over forty years to get here. Change can come if we work really hard in the ways that make sense to each one of us. I am over sixty, so I know it takes time and that there is no magic wand of change out there that I know of. All the bitching in the world does not change anything. Work to elect officials who you like that will change things. If you are mad then work to protest actively. Passive resistance works if you keep at it. It takes heart, courage, stamina and determination to change the mess were are in. I do not know what will work for you and your state. I hate this culture of the far right so much, because I leave in Texas and have Tom DeLay for a congressman. I choked on Bush signs both elections as well. Be creative and write your ideas everywhere you can and join an organization you can support for change. It takes YOU to change things.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Congress isn't trained yet
Posted by: Asses of Evil on Nov 15, 2005 8:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish people would have the balls to demand that of their Congresspeople but there are too many sheep out there. But damn, great article. Made me want to rush the barricades.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On the other hand
Posted by: Maryanne on Nov 16, 2005 11:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Erie County, NY State: Five years ago, a boy wonder was elected county executive. His platform: cutting taxes and consolidating services to save money. One year ago, sailed through reelection.

And then (and only then).. .He came out with his budget for 2005. He had originally taken office with a surplus of over $200 million, as well as tobacco money, a well run government, and services. Suddenly savings were gone, bebt topped $100 million and no money to run the government. To raise some money in the interim, the county hospital was sold back to the County, which now has to pay back with interest.

Where did it all go? County tax had been cut to zero, patronage jobs were rampant, no bid purchases, etc. All is not yet known.

A year later (2005), a soft control board is in place; more than half the legislature chose not to run again, while some incumbents lost to neophytes, services are either eliminated or cut to the bone (including those that were revenue producing), libraries closed, police reduced, many lost their jobs, etc. Fees are now attached to everything. Taxes have gone up dramatically. Less services and increased cost of government.

The County Executive- who has refused to resign- still insists he did the right thing. But his political party has not only denounced him but also has ejected him from the Party. Because he is now toxic and has caused the party to lose greatly in recent elections.

Sooner or later one's sins do catch up. Happened locally. Can it also happen nationally? Hold your breath. Maybe!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

banwagon
Posted by: lou2 on Nov 18, 2005 6:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when you all figure that Bush has little control over the desisions that have been made over this iraq situation and that Bush isn't worried about popularity like other presidents (bill) and other want to be's (kerry). And all those that consider the iraq situation another veitnam are the banwagoners ! The only similar thing is that Nixon was bailing the great kennedy out,and our fearless leader George Bush has been stuck cleaning up the mess that the billy was to much of a socialist and worried what his statuswould be to the new world order !Iraq =Vietnam = Banwagon!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ECLECTICIST, S JIM RODRIGUEZ
Posted by: SJR505 on Nov 19, 2005 11:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "cowardcracts" have been "Emasculated.." by "Silver Foot and Slick.." and their cronies...The issue of "impeachment" comes to mind, but there are not enough "Machos -aka Nongirlie-men" to initiate it and follow through...This same issue of impeachment was considered for "TrIcky Dick" Nixon ...:

By the time Richard Milhous Nixon goes on trial in the Senate, the only real reason for trying him will be to understand how he ever became president of the United States at all ... and the real defendant, at that point, will be the American Political System. -- Hunter S. Thompson, 1973.

S...JIM...RODRIGUEZ+++EL ECLECTICIST+++
333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]