Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

P.O'd About T.O.

By Dave Zirin, AlterNet. Posted November 15, 2005.


Eagles wide receiver Terrell Owens might be a brat loudmouth with zero team spirit, but his year-long suspension keeps him hostage from his fans.
Advertisement

"It is very painful for me that I can't play football for the rest of the season. It really hurts me not to be a part of the team anymore. My goal was to help the Philadelphia Eagles make the Super Bowl and win the big game." - Terrell Owens, November 7th, 2005

He apologized to his teammates. To the fans. To the coach. To the team president. To the owner. Even to the quarterback he had spent the last several months tormenting. Everyone but the victims of the Johnstown Flood and the family of Jimmy Hoffa was offered regrets. But Terrell Owens, the most dynamic and explosive wide receiver in the NFL will still have nowhere to play this year. What sin could possibly have provoked such an extreme reaction by the powers that be? Did Owens take plays off during games? Did he drink and drive? Go on a drugged-out sex cruise? Drink and drive on the deck of a drugged-out sex cruise? Lie about weapons of mass destruction and send a country to war? Nope. Nothing so shocking or dramatic. Coach Andy Reid only said cryptically that the suspension was due to "a large number of situations that accumulated over a long period of time."

But the situation is nothing so secretive. It seems that Owens both wants more money and isn't shy about telling everyone and their mama that this is the case. Owens wants his contract renegotiated. Many a sports radio gasbag has wheezed that T.O. was only done with the first season of a seven-year contract and is therefore "not honoring his deal." But T.O. and every NFL player know that NFL deals have the honor of a politician's promise. The NFL is the only major sports league with contracts that aren't really contracts. Any player can be cut at any time without compensation. The only money players can count on are in the signing bonuses. Everything else -- every zero on the check, could just amount to bells and whistles for free agent press conferences.

The average NFL career is just four years and the Eagles are well bellow the salary cap so T.O. took his chance to renegotiate, as any player would -- and should. T.O. felt like he had leverage after playing in last year's Super Bowl on a broken leg, and catching nine passes for over 100 yards. But when the Eagles didn't bite, T.O. flipped his "everyone can go to hell" switch. It's worth noting though that his anger never showed up on the field. He was on pace for 107 catches and more than 1,700 yards. No receiver in football blends his combination of size, speed, strength, and showmanship -- and now Philly wants to put him on ice. Quarterback Donovan McNabb has said that "the team will be better" without Owens, but that's like saying your car will go faster without the engine.

Don't get me wrong. I am sure Owens is a spectacularly frustrating individual. And his showmanship -- like pulling the Sharpie out of his sock and signing a football after a touchdown are anathema to the values of team work and cooperation that sports can be about. This is someone, remember, who engineered his trade/release from the San Francisco 49ers by accusing his quarterback Jeff Garcia of being gay, saying, "Like my boy tells me: If it looks like a rat and smells like a rat, by golly, it is a rat."

But none of this excuses the basic injustice at work here: that the Philadelphia fans now have a far inferior team, all of us lose a year of the most exciting player in the game, and Owens himself doesn't get to showcase his skills -- all because Owens wanted the same prerogative every NFL owner has: the right to tear up the tissue paper contracts, and ask for more.

His cardinal sin was being loud about it, making this an issue not only of the NFL's double-standard contracts, but an issue of free speech. In a recent letter to Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie and NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue, consumer advocate, and League of Fans founder Ralph Nader spelled out the broader stakes of the Owens suspension, calling the Eagles decision something that "dishonors this country's traditional respect for free speech and cheats fans of an opportunity to see arguably the best receiver in football. ... It should be the policy of the Eagles and the National Football League, as well as other sports teams and leagues, that players not be punished merely for what they say. ... If the Eagles do not want Terrell Owens on their team, then they should release him. Instead, the Eagles propose not just to suspend him for the term permitted by the collective bargaining agreement, but to make him inactive for the duration of the season. This vengeful approach keeps him as an effective hostage -- kept away from the fans who would like to see him play."

Ralph is absolutely right. To be clear, this suspension doesn't turn Terrell Owens into Nelson Mandela. He has never used his uncensored, unfiltered mouth to speak about war, poverty, or any of societies ills. He makes baseball's Barry Bonds look like Malcolm X -- but to paraphrase Bob Watson in The Bad News Bears in Breaking Training, "Let him play."

Digg!

Dave Zirin is the author of "What's My Name Fool? Sports and Resistance in the United States." Read more of his work at EdgeOfSports.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is ridiculous
Posted by: bgroat on Nov 15, 2005 4:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We keep talking about this as if it's different from any other job. If I went to work and flouted the rules and insulted my boss and and my coworkers, I'd be justly fired. His skills as a player have no bearing on the discussion. I may be the best darn fry cook arond, but that doesn't allow me to call my boss a pig.

And enough about the nonbinding contracts. If you want your full contract to be honored, play well enough so that you won't get cut. It's a built-in system of reward; did T.O. deserve more money than $49 million over seven years? I can't believe we're even asking that question. It's $49 million. Excuse me while I wipe a sympathetic tear from my eye. At least I think it's sympathy.

The fact of the matter is, it's irrelevant whether or not he is an excellent player (he is), or if his contract is fair (he signed it, I believe). It's a question of setting a precedent. He spent the off-season criticizing his team's leader, then spent the regular season breaking team rules. Yes, by all means, let's reward that with more money. That's sound management strategy.

Let's not forget that he played a grand total of ONE YEAR. We got to the Super Bowl, yes, but the big hurdle - getting past the Championship game - we did while T.O. was on the bench.

Did T.O score in the Super Bowl? No. He had a relatively quiet 9 catches. The numbers look nice, but they didn't add up to a win. Or a score. And after that one year, the Eagles were supposed to give in to his griping and give him MORE than an average of 7M a year? After ONE SEASON? That would be rather rash.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let Him Sit
Posted by: commonMan on Nov 15, 2005 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't believe I keep hearing "What are the Eagles going to do without TO?" The Eagles were going to the NFC Championship game annually without TO. They are still a high caliber team without him. He has been a disruptive force to say the least. I agree he does have the right to renegotiate, but if it doesn't come to past, shut up and play. Don't ruin team chemistry and alienate yourself. The Eagles can't release him and take the financial hit, so they should pay him to sit and prevent him from reaching his incentives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh, please
Posted by: Erin on Nov 15, 2005 5:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do you waste your time defending another overpaid, egotistical jerk. T.O. deserved this long ago. He undermines his team with his big mouth and cocky attitude. I agree with a previous post that if I said and did even a quarter of the things this guy does I would be permanently on the welfare rolls because no employer would put up with this type of behavior.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If it looks like an asshole, and smells like an asshole, then by golly it's an asshole!
Posted by: bettsoff on Nov 15, 2005 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Eagles organization took a chance that TO might grow up and fit into their team as a contributor and not a showboater. They've never tolerated excessive me-ism and are now using their perogative to bench a player whom they found psychologically detrimental to the playing atmosphere they try to maintain. Let him sit. See if he finally becomes the pariah his behavior begs to make him. I won't be shedding any tears. Who authored this article anyway? Isn't 'ends before means' tactics in sports directly analogous to unregulated capitalism? And the author is saying 'let him play'? Is this article really on Alternet?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Zero sympathy for A-hole in chief T.O.
Posted by: lamar on Nov 15, 2005 6:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
T.O. is in the predicament he is in because he is a total jackass. Anybody who has played team sports knows how destructive a cry baby can be. When you consider that T.O. is much more than a cry baby, reaching the level of certified asshole, his fake promises ring hollow. Maybe you believe that fake apologies give you a chance to be a selfish destructive whiner on another day. I don't think there is a punishment strong enough for that total and complete jackass. Trust me, curse words are not strong enough for how bad T.O. is for any team and the league in general.
Besides, why would you want to turn the NFL into just another NBA/Pro Wrestling drama fest?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

T.O.'s sin
Posted by: tuff_bird on Nov 15, 2005 6:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
TO's sin was not repeatedly asking for a raise and bashing management in public. TO's sin was that the fuss he created began to affect team cohesiveness. At that point, any organization has to make a change.

Why wasn't he released outright? Because he would have to have been paid for the remainder of the season. With the suspension, the Eagles save a LOT of money. Remember, we aren't talking about some poor shlub who struggles to make rent and groceries; we are talking about a grandstanding showboating egotistical jerk who has insulted teammates and opponents throughout his career.

In regard to the propriety of renegotiation, I fail to see how renegotiation is justified in year 2 of an independently bargained for and negotiated 7-year contract. Year 5, perhaps. If he were grossly underpaid in comparison to his counterparts, perhaps. But he is neither.

TO is a talented athlete who, I am afraid, shows the results of our society's tolerance of stuff that is otherwise intolerable from athletes from high school through the pros.

I hope while he lis cooling his heels, he will take the time to think through his unwise choices, and upon his eventual return to the NFL will be somewhat less obnoxious than he has been.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

portly
Posted by: portly on Nov 15, 2005 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While i generally agree with the posts put up here so far...i think his mouth got him in this mess and he deserves this punishment...i find myself asking, did it HAVE to go this way? McNabb WANTED him here. The city wanted him here...he answered our prayers as the "piece of the puzzle" that got us over t he hump and into the Big Dance. If Donovan is such a leader, why couldn't he get this ironed out behind the scenes and keep the team on an even keel?

What i think is at work here is more insideous. The Eagles, like many teams, like to think that it's their "system" that makes them great teams...and that they can just plug any old player into their great system. This TO thing is masking a more serious underlying truth about this franchise: their system, and the men that conceive it and run it, are failing badly. In the name of "holding the line" on salaries, they let players go...good players like Jermaine Mayberry, Carlos Emmons, Corey Simon, Derrick Burgess, Brian Mitchell and Ike Reese. You take out the guts of your team in critical areas like these and try to plug up the spots with unproven players and you're asking for trouble. The season they're having shows the wages of this kind of sin. If Johnson's D "system" is so good, why can't this D pressure the Q-Back anymore? If the Reid/Morningweg O "system" is so great, why can't they run the ball or get their receivers open?

The TO thing is just masking some real deep systematic (pardon the pun) problems with this team. Then again, maybe it's the "Super Bowl Loser" syndrome...NEITHER Super Bowl participant last year is looking like they'll even make the playoffs!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Apology my ass
Posted by: Fade on Nov 15, 2005 6:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its a little late now, Jackass. Idiots like this, who are told by athlete worshippers like Zirin that they are great, that they have god-given ability, that begin to belief that they are blessed because they can play an inconsequential little game, are morons. Maybe he can use some of that money to do something with his life than "Play". Hopefully this experience will cause him to develop an actual personality and not be such a self-centered ass. Its going to be hard, though, with all the bigger morons who worship men for their athletic ability.
America would be a much smarter country without professional sports to befuddle the masses like screaming lemmings at a gladiatorial arena taking their mind off the fact that their lives suck.
Go Cowboys! (hehe)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Needs help
Posted by: jimemak on Nov 15, 2005 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's fairly obvious that while TO can give 200% physically to the team, he can't contibute 100% emotionally. Even armchair psychiatrists can see the pattern - TO on the fadeout. TO's problems haven't been solved or prevented by alternating cycles of love, money, discipline etc. I fault TO's agent Drew Rosenhaus for TO's current situation. No one's benefitting from this except the media. TO does need help to manage his emotions and moods, and to give him the insight as to how his teammates are effected. Anyone who watched him hound McNabb on the sidelines last year knows that TO needs help. I think the media is complicent in painting this as an attitude problem or moral deficiency on TO's part, because facing up to this as an emotional disorder issue removes it from a "gravy" story to one more complicated. And we know that the media can't handle complicated issues. And is it a coincidence that the sports medias last two bad boys(NFL wise), TO and Randy Moss, are African-American?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More Interesting Than T.O.
Posted by: fairleft on Nov 15, 2005 7:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but what will never get talked about: pro football's rampant injury problem. I sit in Chicago watching a third string rookie qb hand off to a third-string running back, and the NFL calls that entertainment? All around the league teams are 'led' by second and third-string skill position players. Would any other sport just completely ignore this kind of thing? The players need to be better protected, the equipment needs to be redesigned, and there need to be radical player weight limits.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Strung Along Posted by: BlueTigress
I disgree with pretty well all the above posts.
Posted by: Colin on Nov 15, 2005 8:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gobsmacked! There’s no other word for it. I can’t believe what’s been said in the other posts. There are several issues here so we’ll go one at a time.

Does this player have the right to tear up a contract?
No.

If the club has the right to tear up the players contract, should the player be able to do the same?
Yes – of course. That is as long as you want to live in a just world.

If the player publicly dissents, do the club have the right to suspend him for 12 months?
Probably, but they would be fascist bastards if they did.

Does his wealth matter on this issue?
No – not one bit. It’s a question of principle.

Does his personality matter on this issue?
No – not one bit. I’ll bet his mother loves him even if the people above do not.

It’s interesting because the football team provides a great little analogy for an entire country. Let’s take some quotes from the previous posters to show what I’m saying;

‘He spent the off-season criticizing his team's leader, then spent the regular season breaking team rules.’

And? What’s this got to do with employment law? In fact – who gives a fuck about the fact he’s been criticising his bosses? How many times have the readers on Alternet criticised your own leader? Oh, I forget, that’s different.

If he’s broken team rules then there should be a formal procedure to dealing with him. Spiteful attacks, which this, at least at first, appears, shouldn’t be tolerated.

‘He undermines his team with his big mouth and cocky attitude.’

Couldn’t exactly the same point be made about progressives in the USA? Would your country not look stronger if every single person agreed entirely with Bush, just because he is in charge? If he wants to speak his mind - HE SHOULD BE ABLE TOO!

All the stuff about the good of the team is irrelevant. We’re talking about the working rights of an individual which should take precedence. For anyone to think differently is tantamount to using the same argument the rich use against the poor but in reverse. Either way, it’s wrong.

So, come on Alternet readers – are you genuine progressives or merely repeating other peoples arguments? Surely if it’s the former, you’ll see why most of what’s been said above is bollocks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ALL you haters out there are some funny people
Posted by: jmarley on Nov 15, 2005 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a capitalist shitstem such as this, more is better and the majority of americans support this shitstem so much that they are even willing to kill others to hang on to it. Yet when a player who is one of the top 2 WR's in the league isnt getting paid his worth and decides he wants to redo his contract he has to catch heat from a bunch of hypocrites. The same hypocrites who would quit their job when the pay or benefits arent what they deserve, but because T.O. is rich he shouldnt be allowed the same options. HAHAHAHAHA Like I said funny ass people. For those of you who don't know and knowing the majority of bobos out there like I do, most of you don't know the NFL doesn't hand out guaranteed contracts. The team can cut your sorry ass in a millisec and be done with you but yet I'm supposed to have sympathy for the owners when a player wants more? I don't care if T.O. makes a trillion dollars, he has the same right to HIS money as everyone else. Support a shitstem such as this and this is your result. GREED. Now choke on it. GO T.O.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Walk The Walk
Posted by: Stonecutter on Nov 15, 2005 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This guy Zinn is applying the same pretzel logic to T.O.'s situation that Bush has applied to the Iraq war: ignore the reality in front of your face and keep pushing the BS uphill.

T.O. is the embodiment of everything wrong with professional athletes in the 21st century, and his agent Drew what's-his-face is an amoral slug, at least in public. Like other mindboggingly arrogant, immature stars with large talent and little smarts, this guy has shat on everything and everyone around him, not the least his own great good fortune to be in the NFL, playing for a contending team and standing out as one of the finest receivers in the biz. Instead of kissing the ground at practice, he has conjured this memorable debacle for himself, and just like Ron Artest, he should be right where he is....watching the games in front of his plasma TV.

My son is a varsity lineman in high school, but he will probably never play college football, let alone in the NFL. He truly loves the game, and is a great fan. He and most of his buddies on their team think T.O. is a schmuck. God bless him for knowing simple right and wrong---and the truth---when it's as plain as day. Unfortunately, T.O. himself put his future in the hands of his ruthless agent, and as a result, he'll probably end up in the Mountains of Denver playing for a lot less cabbage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Truth hurts
Posted by: damdegraff on Nov 15, 2005 11:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What seems to be lost in all this hoopla, is that most of what T.O. says is true. McNabb, did appear to choke in the Super Bowl, he's really not the best passer, the franchise should have acknolwedged TO 100th touchdown, he is one of the best players in the league and probably does deserve more money. Why is this man being punished for speaking the truth? That's the scariest thing about this controversy. The Phili franchise does not allow for dissent, and never strays from the false line of, Support Our Troops, even when evidence points to the contrary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Truth hurts Posted by: Fade
» RE: Truth hurts Posted by: mark
Let's all kiss the company
Posted by: dphel on Nov 15, 2005 11:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NFL contracts are a joke, they're one way streets. If the company, and they are a company, can tear it up so then the player should be allowed to tear it up. Everyone in America loves the company, hates the union, loves the company. This company looks like crap without TO. The 49'ers are crap without TO. Let's all hate TO and kiss the Eagles ass, it's so American.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Jerry Rice
Posted by: badkitty on Nov 15, 2005 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a 49er fan, Terrell Owens always irritated me, except that one time he stomped all over the Dallas insignia. I loved Steve Young, liked Jeff Garcia, and adored Jerry Rice. These guys were team players and gave everything they had to the game. I don't think Owens is a team player, and he doesn't really appear to give everything to the game. I can't speak for the Super Bowl, since he was in it, I couldn't watch it, even though I like McNabb. Of course, I don't care for Philadelphia's coach either, and I think it speaks volumes about him that the Eagles picked Owens up after his behavior in San Francisco. Even if the Eagles let him go, I don't think anyone else would pick him up, not even Al Davis, and those Raider season ticket holders (my husband, my brother-in-law, their friends) who tell me how talented he is, don't want him either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eagles
Posted by: rek967 on Nov 15, 2005 2:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can a company (Eagles) suspend one of its workers (T.O.) without pay for things and he said about the company and his co-workers without letting him seek work from another company (any other team)? Why does T.O. need to honor the stipulations of his contract when the team can cut him at any point they deem profitable (often due to age or injury)? Does anyone else see the hypocrisy of this one-sided arrangement? I agree that T.O. appears to be a egotistical jerk but his suspending him without pay that is promised in his contract is an unacceptable breech of employer-employee relations that sets a bad precedent for all laborers. The collective bargaining agreement of the NFL is the most pro-owner, anti-player contracts in major professional sports and while the players do make millions of dollars, the owners make much, much more and provide their workers with practically no job security while asking them to give their all to a game that is proven to reduce life expectancy. As progressives, even if we don't like T.O. we need to uphold the right of the worker to exercise his or her first amendment rights without fear of having promised pay taken away as a result.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: agles Posted by: sweetlou
We'll Take Him Anyday!
Posted by: juanerd on Nov 15, 2005 3:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
T.O. my hats off to you for standing up to them Redneck bosses of yours. You deserve every cent, just because of your raw guts not to mention your ability as a WR (the best since Rice). The Raiders would do well by trading up for you. Then again the Raiders would need a coach of Bellichik's caliber to lead him properly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

tony
Posted by: mark on Nov 15, 2005 3:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like Tony Kornheiser said, T.O. is a teamkiller. he was bringing the eagles towards a collapse and management had every right to jettison him. BTW the eagles played a great running game last night, and if it wasn't for Mcnabbs ugly turnover, they would've won handily. Owens is a bum

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not a Progressive's Hero
Posted by: erisian75 on Nov 15, 2005 10:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think a little perspective is in order for everyone treating this as a labor dispute and free speech issue. TO is a paid, very well I might add, employee, and if he wants to renegotiate his contract, that's his perogative. Since when does negotiation, though, include alienating your team and fans and throwing a punch at a teammate(which the article conveniently never discusses)? TO is free to say whatever he likes, but like it or not, his employer is free to discipline him for it. The first amendment guarantees freedom of speech from government interference. If you want to fight for the rights of workers everywhere, start with your local Wal-Mart. Leave TO's cause to his highly paid agent, who likely goaded him into this mess in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Watch him play
Posted by: BlueTigress on Nov 17, 2005 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can watch T.O. play Red Rover in that dumb deodorant ad he did that's all over cable any time you want.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]