Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Where Politics and Hip Hop Collide

By Maria Luisa Tucker, AlterNet. Posted November 14, 2005.


The slogan 'Vote or Die!' may have faded into obscurity, but hip hop's political movement didn't perish with it.
111405_story2

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Maria Luisa Tucker

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Last Monday night, Kwame Kilpatrick went on a club crawl of Detroit's liveliest bars and nightclubs. On Tuesday night, the 35-year-old African American ex-football player partied again until the early hours of the morning, this time at an election party. He was celebrating his own victory. Kilpatrick, America's first "hip hop mayor," had won a second term in office.

Despite a first term riddled with "youthful" mistakes -- most famously he admitted using city dollars to lease a Lincoln Navigator for his wife -- Kilpatrick was resilient. He relied on his base of young African-Americans, a risky bet since young people have notoriously low voter turnout rates. But as the youngest mayor ever elected in Detroit and a member of the so-called "hip hop generation," he pulled it off.

The hip hop generation that Kilpatrick belongs to is defined loosely as minorities born between 1965 and 1984 who have grown up within a culture of hip hop music, dance, fashion and art. They are the first generation born in a post-Jim Crow society, and were raised largely in urban neighborhoods that have exemplified both the successes and ironies of the civil rights movement.

Even with legal equality, schools remained largely segregated. Despite an ever increasing black middle class, black and brown people remained over-represented among the ranks of the poor and unemployed. As the hip hop generation has come of age, many of its members have reacted to these realities by forming or participating in an array of social justice organizations. Only a few have gotten involved in electoral politics; Kilpatrick was elected in 2001, and poet and hip hop activist Ras Baraka was appointed Newark's deputy mayor in 2002 after an earlier unsuccessful run for mayor.

Like Kilpatrick himself, hip hop's growing presence in electoral politics has shown itself to be controversial, awkwardly unpredictable -- and incredibly charismatic. In 2004, it was not clear if the highly publicized hip hop voter registration drives, such as Sean "P. Diddy" Comb's "Vote or Die!" campaign (in which Kilpatrick participated), marked the beginning of a political movement, or simply a trend during a dramatic election year. A year later, it seems that hip hop's place in politics is continuing to grow. The collaborations and organizations that sprung up from the 2004 election are, for the most part, stronger than ever. If a national hip hop political movement was in its infancy last year, then this year it's beginning its uncomfortable adolescence.

"The election was really important. It was really the first time you saw this sort of effort on both the celebrity level and the grassroots level that came together around one big thing," says Jeff Chang, hip hop journalist and author of Can't Stop, Won't Stop. But he likens the trajectory of the hip hop's political movement to entropy--it tends toward disorder and randomness. "The hip hop political movement is not something that has a monolithic look to it. You're talking about folks working day in and day out on a range of issues. What unites them is the fact that there has been massive generational change since the civil rights movement. The question is, how to do you harness something that looks like entropy?"

It's a good question with about a million answers. As a political movement, hip hop is finding itself and just about everything is up for debate: who its leaders should be, who the movement represents, and how to harmonize hip hop's historical resistance against the establishment with a new urge to participate in mainstream politics. The people who made 2004 such a big year for hip hop are, in 2005, proposing very different ways to carry forward.

The Grassroots Organizers

"Hip hop has always been political," says Rosa Clemente, a New York-based activist and co-host for WBAI's (99.5 FM/NYC) show, "Where We Live." "Hip hop can be used to show resistance against oppression; that's what it was in the beginning and that's what it continues to be."

Since its birth in the Bronx, hip hop has certainly welcomed lyrics about oppression, resistance to the white establishment, and blunt challenges to government, from N.W.A.'s hit "Fuck Tha Police" in 1988, to Jadakiss' 2004 song "Why?" which asked "Why did Bush knock down the towers." With a history of Afro-centric nationalism, gangsta rap and graffiti art, hip hop had never been used as a means of assimilation into mainstream (white) culture. It has always been more likely to dismiss electoral politics in favor of localized social justice work.

Clemente, who identifies herself as a black Puerto Rican grassroots organizer, was part of the surge in the 1990s of activists who tied their social justice work closely to hip hop culture. Her professional history could be easily mistaken for notes on hip hop's political agenda. She has tackled issues including youth organizing, prison rights, African-American/Latino relations, racism in South Africa, and ethnic disparities in health care. On the roster of larger organizations she's affiliated with is the Malcolm X Grassroots Movement, which was founded in Brooklyn in 1993 to focus on self-determination and community building. Through its Central Brooklyn Cop Watch and Political Prisoner Amnesty Campaign, the Malcolm X Grassroots Movement also deals with two ever-present issues for African-Americans and Latinos: police brutality and discrimination in the criminal justice system. For Clemente, the key word when it comes to hip hop's political future is self-determination.


Digg!

Maria Luisa Tucker is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
before I even read this
Posted by: mrjones on Nov 14, 2005 12:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can easily imagine how the slogan "vote or die" would back fire... kids that really live the ghetto hustler lifestyle know they have to watch their backs or they might die, it's a real possiblity, and then someone comes along and says you have to vote or die and they see that's total BS, they know what they have to do to survive, and then someone tries to trivialize the life and death reality they're dealing with daily and they just turn it off... and similarly suburban hip hop fans aren't going to buy it either. Obviously it would be great to get more young people to vote since if they did they most likely wouldn't vote for the likes of GW, but you can't just tell them go vote, they have to have a more general political awareness first to actually motivate them, and for that they have to see how politics affects them in their own daily life. I'm sure the campaign means to point out stuff just like that, but they're really putting the cart in front of the horse when they base it around the slogan "vote or die" since kids know very well if they fail to vote they're not going to die because of it. It just looks like another one of these corny ploys adults in authority try to use to make them conform to a system they don't relate to, like reading will make you sexy or whatever teachers try to say these days...

just my 50 cents

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: before I even read this Posted by: mrjones
Kwame Kilpatrick should not be held up as a good example.
Posted by: zmesberg on Nov 14, 2005 12:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over the past year, I worked in Detroit as an EMT for a private ambulance service. I was witness first hand to the overarching failure of the political system there. Much of the city lies in ruins and government services are often unavailable. Mr. Kilpatrick has done nothing to help with the problems of the city and has in many cases made things worse. He has cut back on police, fire, and ems services in the city and is personally protected by a large team of Detroit Police officers at all times, taking these officers off the street where they are desperately needed. The city administration is racked by corruption and embezzlement and the citizens of Detroit pay the price while Mr. Kilpatrick throws lavish parties. Kwame should certainly not be held up as a positive example to do so is irresponsible. The author of this article should do his research.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Soft Pop
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 14, 2005 4:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've got a great idea! Hip Hop has something to offer politically - no question about it! But how about Easy Listening of the Bobby Goldsboro variety. Remember him? I had an idea that we could rewrite his awful and maudlin 1967 hit "Honey" You remember that one, dont you?

And Honey I miss you
And I'm being good
And I'd love to be with you
If Only I could

Yeah. Dreadful stuff, I know. But you could re-write it and make politically viable and even listenable at the same time! Allow me to demonstrate....

One time I thought that Ronald Reagan's
Presidency was the worst thing possible
But that was many years ago and nowadays
That sentiment seems laughable
Not long ago in Texas the electorate
Coughed up a brain-dead superstar
I never had faith in the voters
But I never realized how dumb they are....
*****
And Ronnie I miss you
And I'm feeling Blue
I've lost all of my senses
I'm nostalgic for you...
*****
And see the debt how big it's grown
But friends it hasn't been too long
It wasn't big
Just four and one half years ago
The debt that's now a red wood tree
Was just a twig....

Oh yeah, real possibilites.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Soft Pop Posted by: schnoggi
» RE: To Schnoggi: Posted by: Tom Degan
Segregation is the wrong road
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 14, 2005 4:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Black activists fought for integration for years. They wouldn't have been successful without the the white activists who fought against injustice. If the blacks intend to base their platform on the hip-hop rapper theme of anarchy they will lose the support of the whites. Racial segregation in politics is not a good idea. They are still in a minority nationally. I think that any group that starts a third party is bound to fail. Like it or not, we have two parties that are controlled by the rich and powerful. They will not allow a third party to win. The logical approach is not to start a "feel-good, fighting for a lost cause" third party but to take control of both existing parties before the 2006 election. I don't mean that blacks or any other group can take exclusive control for their own selfish agenda. No group can do that. However, the people can force both parties to decide whether they will or won't support their positions. Click on we can do it

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Segregation is the wrong road Posted by: electoralwarrior
Vote or Die was a harbinger.
Posted by: phelander on Nov 14, 2005 6:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ask New Orleans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about the rest of the North?
Posted by: SDres11 on Nov 14, 2005 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why can't the hip-hop generation learn to make inroads into rural America? Just take a look at my state of South Dakota. Despite depopulation, Asian Americans are growing even in my state of South Dakota and throughout the rest of the rural north and upper midwest. I know it's tough to be a Democrat outside an urban area like Detroit but it's not impossible. And by the way, the reason the "Vote or die" slogan backfired last year, especially here in SD, was there was nothing to choose from. Oh, sure there was Nader but he only campaigned in "blue" and most "swing" states so he was no more a credible independent than Ross Perot was in 1992 and even 1996. I'd like to see these people test their "hip-hop" stuff in the rest of Michigan for a change. At least they'd realize that they're making the same mistake of going narrow-minded which "conservatives" want them to do. Populism, please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mick3
Posted by: mick3 on Nov 14, 2005 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, it's all politics in the end. Politics rule our lives, and at present, we have only the one political Party, the Right. What should be the party of the people was hijacked twenty years ago by rightwing Al Fromm and the corporate tool he founded, the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC)--not to be confused with the Democratic National Council, an organizing arm of the Party headed now by Howard Dean. Dean, if you remember, was taken down by the DLC in the 2004 primaries so they could install corporatist, imperialist John Kerry, now running around the country making candidate noises again, along with Hillary Clinton, who never saw an elitist or a corporation she didn't just love.

Until--or rather if--we ever get the Democratic Party out of the clutches of those people, very little will be accomplished of value except to the rich and powerful. Oh, we'll see dribs and drabs of "moving forward" but it'll be "living just enough for the city" rather than real progress. We should all be lobbying Dean and his brother Jim to do everything possible to dislodge the subversives from the Democratic Party. Then, the rest of us might have a chance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mick3 Posted by: mrjones
» RE: mick3 Posted by: electoralwarrior
The Beginnings of New Heroes
Posted by: Allan Shore on Nov 14, 2005 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for the article. Very interesting. I have been writing on another site (Gather.com) a series of pieces about how advocates of various colors and flavors over the years have done much to inspire and bring about change. However, one would never know that from watching the commercial projects that make and/or glorify heroes and heroines in our life. Instead, we see only greedy, self-oriented, bang-bang-shoot'em-up characters who seek mostly to make the world a better place for the rich and powerful. No matter how much they struggle and fail, people like these rappers are showcasing some of the substance of what true advocates in action could be like if movies, literature, TV and the other entertainment venues set about making stories that where people struggle with life's challenges but still end up making the world a better place. It takes time for new ideas to make their mark. I aplaud these people for trying to do something different that has action and advocacy for justice as the core of their story. Let's do what we can to help. We might all find it is worth the adventure. (PS-- You can see some of my ideas in my writings at http://epoweropinions.pbwiki.com.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Digable Planets
Posted by: demidesigrrl on Nov 14, 2005 9:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The white mainstream prefers to stop its ears to the sound of any kind of revolution. If you want an example of how hip-hop resonates to social issues, listen to the Digable Planets. Sadly, their brand of great, aware lyrics got bypassed by the music industry (duh) in favour of that which reinforced the mainstream's view of "violent, black, urban youth".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Grassroots Moblilization by Hip-Hop Generation Must Start Now!
Posted by: electoralwarrior on Nov 15, 2005 7:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many of these so-called voter groups that sprang up within the past two years are laughable in many regards.
Many of these initiatives put forth by hip-hop artists and other Gen X thespians and Hollywood types to get out the vote are even more hilarious and here's why:
There's never a clearcut agenda! "Vote or Die!" "November 2: We Decide" are among a few.
The failure of these groups and their initiatives is that they underestimated how serious and hardcore the conservative opposition was/is. Many of them, for fear of losing their 501 (c)3 status, had to continually state that they were non-partisan organizations, however, the 2004 presidential election was about one thing and one thing only in the minds of many youth from the hip-hop generation: Vote Bush out of office ASAP or "Anybody but Bush."
Hundreds of thousands of new high-school and college-age voters didn't get registered to re-elect Bush.
So clearly where they went wrong by not stating their agenda: to end Bush's political career. By them not being clear, they sent mixed messages.
One being rap group OutKast's at the 4th Annual BET Awards of that year, when member Andre 3000 said how it didn't matter who you voted for just vote. What? And mind you, he too had just voted for the first time as well as another of Erykah Badu's exes--Common.
What these groups--HSAN, League of Pissed Off Voters, Citizen Change, etc must realize is that they must organize locally first and foremost. What difference does it make if you work heavily on the national front to determine the outcome of a presidential election when you have corruption and scandals running rampant in the state and city in which you live?
None of these groups from my observation have any experienced grassroots activists and others as part of their team to do voter education and registration.
So hopefully they're not lying dormant waiting for '08 to get active again, they need to be not active behind the scenes but on the front lines as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HNIC Report
Posted by: nkelley on Nov 20, 2005 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is questionable if there is a "hip-hop politics." If there is a hip-hop generation, what exactly is the style or essential issues that form it for this specfic generation? Music often reflects the politics of an era, and doesn't lead politics itself. The hip-hop generation may be confused about this because "hip-hop politics" actually represents the sad state of black politics in general. As I tried to point out in my book "The Head Negro In Charge Syndrome" (Nation Books, 2004), effective black politics has collapsed. Why? Black politics has no effective political mobilization around issues that better peopple's lives. It lingers on symbolism: MLK, Malcolm, Million Man Marches, Civil Rights, Rosa Parks, Jesse Jackson, Farrakhn, Sharpton, Russell Simmon, P. Diddy, etc.

Unfortunatley, blacks have lost considerable ground in political mobilization. Today's young blacks are trying to use hip-hop as a means to mobilization. This is problematic because blacks no longer have effective independent political organizations. Having such would not mean segregation—and America is still segregated when it comes to power—but it could mean using cohesive political mobilization to demand concessions. Black intellectuals, especially Cornel West, have become celebrities and don't offer any substanial analyses of what's has been going in the last 40 years. Name a book that does so? It's really hard to come up with one. There are more black intellectuals—public black intellectuals—but their work is a general embarrassment compared to the previous generations that did more with less money and security. Discourse is now centered on culture and identity—not action & follow-up.

Also, too much emphasis has been placed on just politics and not on economic mobilization, which is an issue that is not really considered by the left, black or white.

The term "hip-hop" is thrown around much like black power was during the '60s & '70s. Ask yourself this, given the issues that confront blacks, why hasn't the hip-hop generation developed organizations comparable to SNCC or the Black Panthers? Hip hop summits and conferences have become politics in and of themselves, not a means towards mobilization and action.

At the end of the day, much of what is called hip-hop politics mirrors the increasing bankruptcy of today's black politics in general: self-appointed HNICs who don't enhance peoples' lives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]