Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Pumping the Oil Tycoons

By Ari Berman, The Nation. Posted November 11, 2005.


Big Oil bigwigs were in the hot seat during Wednesday's rare Senate hearing on soaring oil industry profits -- but all we got out of them was hot air.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Ari Berman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

It was a great quarter for the oil industry, but Wednesday was not a great day.

For the first time this year, top executives from ExxonMobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, BP and Shell Oil were summoned to Capitol Hill for a little Q&A with Congress. Big Oil's soaring profits, at a time of record gas prices last month, meant sagging poll numbers for the Republican leadership -- a reality even Senate majority leader Bill Frist couldn't ignore when he hastily called for hearings shortly after ExxonMobil announced $9.9 billion in third-quarter profits, the largest take in US corporate history. Four companies are expected to collectively pocket $100 billion in profits this year.

Dozens of reporters, young activists wearing "ExposeExxon" T-shirts and industry lobbyists filled a spacious Senate room on Wednesday for a rare joint hearing by the Energy and Natural Resources and Commerce committees. They expected a showdown, a rarity given that this Congress hasn't been known to investigate much of anything, least of all oil companies.

After all, the Bush Administration and the Republican Congress have reliably provided favors large and small to Big Oil, paving the way to unprecedented prosperity. In the last year alone, they've blocked meaningful action on global warming and significant investment in renewable energy sources, sought to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for oil drilling, inserted $2.6 billion in tax breaks into the energy bill and cleared the way for new, regulation-lite oil refineries by holding open a five-minute floor vote in the House for forty-eight minutes. Big Oil responded in kind, donating $13.3 million to Republican Congressional candidates in the 2004 election cycle.

But the profits and the poll numbers have become too significant to ignore. Seventy-two percent of the public believe oil companies gouged gas prices in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, according to an ABC News poll. Four out of five Americans support a tax on windfall profits to benefit alternative energy sources, the Civil Society Institute recently found. "The polling numbers are so bad for Washington Republicans that there are only two groups less popular than they are right now," the Cato Institute's Jerry Taylor recently told CNBC's Lawrence Kudlow, "Oil companies and mass murderers."

The oil execs started Wednesday's hearing with a note of defiance by refusing to testify under oath, possibly recalling the image of their predecessors holding their right hands in the air before a Congressional hearing in 1974.

Thirty-one years later, many of the same questions exist. "Are you rigging the price of oil?" asked Energy and Natural Resources Chairman Pete Domenici, who's accepted more than $500,000 from oil companies since 1989. "I think you owe the American people an explanation."

When the execs pointed to rising global demand, decreasing supply, worldwide speculators, disruptions from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and nettlesome domestic regulations, Domenici replied: "I'm not sure my constituents will be pleased with that answer."


Digg!

Ari Berman is a contributing writer for The Nation, based in Washington DC, and a Nation Institute Puffin Foundation writing fellow.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Peak Oil Scarcity, Myth or Not it Doesn't Matter
Posted by: decembrist on Nov 11, 2005 1:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With so much space on Alternet given to peak oil and excessive Big Oil profits lately, I've read some posts seeking to debunk peak oil as a ploy by globalization forces to subjugate the world under a myth of oil scarcity.

I ask you, peak oil conspiracy believers, could not the same results be had by denying the coming of peak oil and keeping the world solely on an oil track, thereby creating REAL scarcity and a world ruled by those who kept their access to oil intact regardless of the price?

In a world ruled by the real scarcity of oil, oil execs and those nations with access to oil would hold the key to keep selective economies and mighty militaries intact and burgeoning. And the key to bring others to their knees.

Real peak oil is a much more simple explanation than a complex of industry and government conspirators. Either way, however, the american people and most of the world are in for a shit-storm, as our personal automobiles and suburban houses become serious liabilities, not to mention the transport of our food and goods.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's Showtime!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 11, 2005 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That whole scene was a sham! A show trial for propaganda purposes and nothing else. No tough questions were asked and nothing was learned. This was just the republicans pathetic way of trying to say, "See, America? We're on your side. You have to vote for us in 2006". Give me a break.

Don't buy into the shell game. These hideous bastards have to be removed from power next year. Every fucking one of them. Look at what they've done to our country. Don't forget - now matter what happens between now and next year. Don't think for one minute that they will "miss" some terrorist plot in the weeks before election day in order to make people really paranoid again. You think that sounds like an extreme statement? Think again. These people are dispicable.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's Showtime! Posted by: squadsright
» RE: It's Showtime! Posted by: stoney13
» RE: It's Showtime! Posted by: cyclone
A Really Big Show
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 11, 2005 5:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congress is having a huge investigation to find out if oil companies are gouging the public. This is a charade. Congress wants us to think that they are on the side of the consumer, fighting against the big oil companies that finance their campaigns. Did they gouge? The big profits could be a clue. The pump price didn't go up suddenly because demand rose suddenly. It went up because the price of crude went up. The profits rose because the profit is figured, more or less, as as a percentage of crude oil cost. The profits rise with the cost of oil. Instead of trying to collect a windfall profit tax or trying to appeal to their corporate conscience, the easiest solution would be to peg the gasoline tax on the price of a barrel of crude. As the cost of crude goes up the tax goes up. The public would at least share in the profit. It doesn't cost any more to refine $60 a barrel oil than $30 a barrel oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ECLECTICIST, S. JIM RODRIGUEZ
Posted by: SJR505 on Nov 11, 2005 6:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There they, the five CEOS of big oil - LEE RAYMOND,EXXON; DAVID O'REILLY ,CHEVRON; JAMES MULVA,CONOCO PHILLIPS; ROSS PILARI, BP; JOHN HOFMEISTER, SHELL, sat if front of the "toothless "Senate committee flicking off all questions of the giant profits, etc, but never answering the questions as why...The insult came next when Lee Raymond, hair lip and all, was asked about the additional $ 2. 6 billion tax incentive credits issued by the congress to the oil companies...and, his reply implied that they were irrevelant : "THAT ENERGY LEGISLATION IS ZERO IN TERMS OF HOW IT AFFECTS EXXON MOBIL..." All five CEOS reminded me of the "PHARRISES" in scripture, all the all knowing, smug, arrogant, dismissing these pervasive issue of the day as irrelevant...If anthing, they should always remember PROVERBS 17:13 :

" WHOSO REWARDETH EVIL FOR GOOD, EVIL SHALL NOT DEPART FROM HIS HOUSE.."

S...JI...RODRIGUEZ+++EL ECLECTICIST+++
3333333333333333333333333333333333333

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

these hearing were a joke!
Posted by: zooeyhall on Nov 11, 2005 7:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These hearings were a total joke, a complete frigging farce from the inception.

It was obvious that no real questions would be answered or allowed.

These people are all in bed with each other--congressmen and oil companies alike. And Pete Dominci asking tough questions? After receiving $500,000 from the oil companies? Sheesh!!

This was like Al Capone holding a hearing on John Dillinger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here comes the circus!! Send in the clowns!!!
Posted by: stoney13 on Nov 11, 2005 9:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again the Repugs trot out Bush's base to answer the real hard questions!! Give me a fucking break!!!

Did anyone listen to this bunch of corn-fed pricks?!! Did any one catch how the Repugs fought gamely to keep them from having to take an oath to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?!! Kinda shoots down any credibility the Repugs and their base have!! Doesn't it?

Oh, they were a glib bunch! I'll give 'em that!! Never before have I heard so many speak at such great lengths to say so little to so clueless!

Did you here Lee Raymond? "Petroleum earnings go up and down with the volatility in the openly and globaly traded commidities in which we deal." YYYAAAAAAARGH!!!!! WHAT'S IT ALL MEAN!!!!!!! Okay here's what it means! "We sold our shit fror ten prices and you dumb-asses were stupid enough to buy it! Now we got all this money! Though shit!!!"

Almost too precious was Shell Oil's John Hofmeister and his purple-fisted plea for Congress not to seek "punative taxes on an industry working hard to respond to high prices and supply shortfalls." (Awwwwwww!! Makes you want to pick him up, dry his little tears and cuddle him! Doesn't it?) Basicly what he said was" Oil costs money and you need it, so don't fuck with us!! We can make it stop, you know and then where will you be!!!"

All in all, Big Oil's message to the people was "Tough shit! Get used to it!!"

All in all, Congress' message to Big Oil was "Thank you, sir! May we have another??!!"

SHIT'S GOTTA CHANGE!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gross Margins
Posted by: zap2scott on Nov 11, 2005 10:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, they certainly are.

The oil companies try to justify their prices by saying they have to maintain their "margins", meaning the % of profit determined by sales price and cost of the acquired product. So if their costs go up 20%, the sales price goes up 20%. That approach is pure and unaldulterated BS and increases the absolute dollars in their pockets - the greater the increase in their product costs, the more money for them. How's that for motivation to keep the cost of oil down?

To protect their shareholders, they need to protect their earnings per share - that is, make the same net dollars on a gallon of product.

So, unless other costs go up because of an increase in cost of a barrel of oil (purchased if that is how they acquire it, or extracted if that is how they acquire it), their prices need only go up by an amount equal to the cost increase they are incurring.

Anything else is disingenous at best. Of course if they want their bonuses to go up, they need to stick it to the public.

Someone tell them another way they can save money is to stop running those "we protect the environmen" ads. More BS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm going to hate myself for this.
Posted by: SteveO on Nov 11, 2005 10:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please God forgive me because this actually defends those overpaid slime ball CEOs.

The wholesale price of oil (and gasoline) is set by traders on the New York Mercantile exchange. That means that any person or organization (hedge fund) can buy oil futures. When Katrina hit, the price of gas on the exchange went through the roof. Not because the supplieres didn't have gas to sell, but because the speculators bought like mad. The oil companies made out because the "market price" was high and they sold at the going rate regardless of what they paid to produce the gas.

I'm sure the $6 per gallon was true price gouging but I suspect the local distributor or the gas station owner was the culprit there.

I'm NOT saying big oil is in the right. When they say things like "That's not a good precedent for the industry to fund." when they were asked to help fund heating it shows how nasty and greedy these pricks really are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I hate to say this... Posted by: qrswave
You all need a lesson
Posted by: popsicle67 on Nov 11, 2005 12:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The oil companies record profits are a direct result of the volume they sell not the price they charge. The profit on a gallon of gas after all the taxes and wages and insurance and
license fees comes to 10 cents or so. That varies in small amounts from time to time but that is close enough for this argument. All price changes are reflecting what the wholesale price does in the futures market and you may ask "if the gasoline is already payed for why are you raising prices now?
you haven't bought at the higher price yet) well the answer is that the companies have to charge the higher price now so they will be able to afford the same amount of fuel when they do purchase at the higher prices. In other words your always
paying for the next tank of gas not the last one. Now as for who is making oodles and gobs off of oil ask the government
what it's take is. Federal, state, and local taxes make a full third of the price at the pump when you also add in all of the permits that are needed to haul and store the stuff. The only
scammers in this whole mess are the politicians who are preying on your misunderstanding right now. If you allow them to enact any windfall profits legislation be aware that
they are only lining their own pockets it will not help us in any way and may indeed hurt us in the fact that stations will close piling us into more crowded filling stations with prices that are higher yet. That is what happened when Carter pulled this same manuever or doesn't anybody remember this was tried before.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sometimes conspiracies are real
Posted by: herbivore on Nov 11, 2005 2:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over the last two years I've heard over and over how the more than doubling of the price of oil is because of increased demand (China is especially targeted but the US has also increased it's demand due to dropping(!) fuel efficiency overall - likely because of more SUVs on the road). The numbers don't compute - the increases in demand and decreases in supply (if any) are not large enough to make up for the huge spike in oil prices.

Let me just introduce the idea that there could be a conspiracy: that a weapon/oil corporate coalition (including the major armament corporations, big 5 oil corporations, and OPEC countries) is able to create a general feeling of crisis (with the ongoing war in Iraq, Afghanistan and premonitions of war in Syria) and with their hands on the oil taps to reduce the flow to create a feeling of scarcity. Of course, it's a bit more complicated than that but in the interest of time I refer you to Nitzan and Bichler's theory that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan happened precisely to raise the price of oil and to create a stagflationary global economy (one of rising inflation and dropping economic growth). And it is the rising oil prices and inflation that helps out the accumulation of the largest corporate coalitions.

But I'll let you read it for yourself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Back to the swearing in issue...
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Nov 11, 2005 5:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm really puzzled by this.

And I know a little something on the topic because I spent eight years on the Hill, six as a professional committee staffer.

It was always my understanding that swearing-in was an all or nothing deal. Our committee counsel always maintained this was necessary so as not to prejudice anyone that had been sworn or would be sworn in the future.

I cannot understand how they were able to dictate these terms--the oilmen that is.

As much as I loath them, I can understand their reluctance to end up on every media outlet in America hand held aloft. But tough cookies. For the several million per year they are paid, I'd stand there in my boxer shorts.

New on EWM: “Operation Choke the Chicken”
DHS won’t be caught with its pants down by Avian Flu

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hot Seat?
Posted by: Kirc Zame on Nov 11, 2005 6:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sound bites I heard from the senate's alleged grilling of the oil tycoons came off rather more as a stage managed production than an incisive inquiry.

The senate, having to look like they care, stage a little play for media. Senators puffed up on their own bravado make every effort to look the part of defending the average Joe from corporate rapine.

Meanwhile the oil execs, knowing full well they own most of the chamber play their little scripted parts with a wink and nod and a little false bluster, and go on about there business. Lunch anyone?

Where's the hot seat?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Amateurs...
Posted by: ukexpat on Nov 14, 2005 11:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where is the BBC's Jeremy Paxman when you need him -- he's the right man to question these guys...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]