Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Woman Behind Arnold's Defeat

By Kathleen Sharp, Pacific News Service. Posted November 10, 2005.


Forget groping -- Schwarzenegger's biggest 'woman problem' is the head of California's nurses union, who led a successful movement to defeat his special election initiatives.
Advertisement

Women have had a bruising time in the public eye lately, ranging from Judith Miller's deceptive reports in the New York Times to Harriet Miers' embarrassing qualifications for the Supreme Court. So when a woman manages to outperform the most confident governor in America, it's worth celebrating.

On Tuesday, Nov. 8, every one of California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's pet initiatives failed, in large part because of Rose Ann DeMoro, the chief executive of the California Nurses Association (CNA). She and her 65,000-member union spent most of this year building a broad-based populist movement that the once-powerful governor tried to dismiss with glib one-liners.

Certainly, one reason Schwarzenegger's initiatives failed was widespread anger over his $70 million "special" election. Lengthening the probationary period before teachers can qualify for tenure (Prop. 74), weakening the unions (Prop. 75), bypassing elected lawmakers on fiscal matters (Prop. 76) and privatizing the redistricting process (Prop. 77) were not going to solve California's financial problems.

But voters may not have gotten this message if it weren't for DeMoro and her indefatigable nurses. Early on they stressed that Schwarzenegger's election was a corporate power grab at the expense of California workers. The nurses hammered home this message almost daily, even when they risked being ostracized. As Lou Paulson, head of the California Professional Firefighters, said: "Rose Ann and the nurses showed us that the emperor had no clothes."

Their activism started last November, after Schwarzenegger suspended key portions of the state's nurse-to-patient ratio to help hospital chains. "That really angered us," says DeMoro. But the nurses protested tentatively, almost timidly, until one pivotal day last December.

While the governor addressed a state convention of 10,000 women, a few nurses unfurled a protest banner that read "Hands Off Patient Ratios." Schwarzenegger grinned for the TV cameras, then said: "Pay no attention...to the special interests. I am always kicking their butts." DeMoro was outraged. "For the Governor to denigrate nurses -- a historically female profession -- while speaking to an audience of women is an affront to women everywhere," she told CNN. Because Schwarzenegger had shut them out of the health-care debate, the nurses decided to take their case to the streets.

"We were told to not make waves, that the people of California would turn against us to support their popular governor," DeMoro says. At the time, Schwarzenegger had a 65-percent approval rating, along with fawning cover stories in Fortune and Vanity Fair magazines.

Even so, the nurses continued marching while the state's firefighters, teachers and law enforcement unions watched from the sidelines. DeMoro rented a plane to buzz wealthy guests at the governor's gated Brentwood mansion during his Super Bowl Sunday party. The nurses flew it over Wall Street while the governor held a $10,000-a-plate fundraiser there. They dogged him in Chicago at a lavish fundraiser, flying a banner that read "Don't Be Big Business' Bully."

When the governor reneged on his oft-repeated promise to restore $2 billion to education cuts in February, students and teachers joined the nurses. They gathered with pickets one rainy day at a Sacramento theater where the governor was about to watch the premiere of Get Shorty 2. But when nurse Kelly Di Giacomo was whisked out of the movie line and into a back room, protestors grew worried. The governor's security team grilled the petite nurse for over an hour until she finally asked why they considered her a threat. One of Schwarzenegger's bodyguards pointed to her scrubs and explained. "You're wearing a nurse's uniform."

"Oh, sure," she said, drolly. "The international terrorist uniform." That intimidating experience emboldened the nurses, whose protests began attracting media attention. By spring, TV news cameras were moving their soft-lens focus from Schwarzenegger to the growing crowds of angry workers, most of them women.


Digg!

Kathleen Sharp is a Santa Barbara-based writer. She is co-producer of the documentary "The Last Mogul," in theaters now.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Didn't Arnie once act as the worst school teacher?
Posted by: Smiggsy on Nov 10, 2005 12:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if he got a bigger headache from all this - "Its nut a bwain toomer".

Advice - Don't quit your day job (which was being a gym monkey more over than being an actor).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People power
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 10, 2005 4:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republicans have had the aim of destroying the unions ever since the unions were legitimized in the 30's. The unions are the backbone of the middle class. They became corrupt, as any powerful group tends to do, but their effect on the whole was beneficial. The whole middle class benefited by their activity, not only their members.. All Americans should honor the unions by not patronizing non-union businesses. We should shun industries that are sending jobs overseas without taking care of their displaced workers. The unions were once the mainstay of the Democratic party, but the party has not fought the onslaught of anti-labor conservatives. It is in our best interest to preserve the unions. If the unions are destroyed the middle class will suffer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: People power Posted by: crusty
» RE: People power Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: People power Posted by: crusty
» RE: People power Posted by: Lincoln fan
community strength
Posted by: hirondelle on Nov 10, 2005 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
YES, women power, people power, community activism is alive and well !!

Finally, some Americans are waking up from a long sleep and coming to their senses. The Calfornia nurses have stopped and looked up from their busy lives and realized; corporate dominance of decisions that affect our lives and do not benefit the guy on the street, need to be stopped. As do dangerous political decisions, a la Bushites.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Playbook for the future?
Posted by: Shorebird on Nov 10, 2005 6:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, the tireless efforts of California's nurses, teachers, and firefighters will make a fine chapter in the playbook all of us who defend the health and rights of women will need.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh my. A defeat for Arnold and Pro-Choice in Kaleeforneeah.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Nov 10, 2005 7:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was a ballot initiative for "weakening the unions (Prop. 75)"?

I thought it was a ballot initiative that would have required unions to get permission--consent by choice--from an employee to use HIS/HER union dues for political purposes.(???)

Wait...unless the unions were able to convince the electorate that PERMISSION--consent by "CHOICE"--equates to "WEAKNESS". (How much do ya think that cost???)

Thus, it would seem, this ballot initiative was a resounding defeat for both Arnold and the Pro-Choice movement. But hey, don't get me wrong--the people have spoken, and nothing brings a Jeffersonian tear of approval to my eye like a ballot initiative.

Just don't act too surprised if the popular electorate-based defeat of a truly Pro-Choice ballot initiative comes around to bite folks in the privates...

...regarding "other" issues, in other places.

But don't think about that--be happy today because a rather silly and already ineffective Republican governor looks a little more silly and ineffective. HAR! Take a while and be happy, but don't forget to worry about what other states (states that are also contemplating going to a ballot-initiative system) are saying about the rejection of Pro-Choice by popular vote of the electorate.

Gorsh and gee-whillickers, people: democracy in action is sometimes a strange animal. It can trample like an elephant and kick like a mule.

As a side note: there are parties out there with platforms other than "defeating ________________". (Fill in the blank with Fascist Nazi Republican if you're a nutso Democrat, or with NancyBoyWeakOnTerror Democrat if you happen to be of the nutso Republican party.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

May we please get past hero worship?
Posted by: ScottP on Nov 10, 2005 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think it benefits the political system to substitute one hero with the next. That creates instability and openings for opportunists. I certainly applaud the efforts of the nurses in general and the activists in particular. But if we support single individuals rather than causes, do we not set ourselves up for another Dean crash or Arnold rip off?

The so called "once-bright political future" was actually winning the election with only 35% of the vote, followed by popularity based on stardom and not rocking the boat. As soon as he started doing something everyone realized he was as much a creep in real life as he is in his violent movie roles or when he drives one of his Dummers.

If we continue to worship stars, be they macho male actors or thoughtful and caring women, we will continue to get screwed. It is high time to emphasize policy and action, and then when politicians make great speeches but stab us in the back, they won't get re-elected, like Pete Wilson (former 2 term governor and advisor to Arnold) did, and Reagan did, and W did...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: May we please get past hero worship? Posted by: liberalibrarian
HOW DUMB IS HE?
Posted by: krose on Nov 10, 2005 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HOW DUMB IS HE TO ATTACK THE NURSES? That is pretty dumb, even for Arnold! Everyone loves nurses and teachers and firefighters! No one pays them what they are worth, or treats them well, but everyone loves them and needs them! To attack them is one of the dumbest political moves imaginable, and he deserves to be thrown out of office immediately for a severe case of stupidity and lack of empathy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HOW DUMB IS HE? Posted by: jwg
We could use these kind of bravehearts throughout the south
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 10, 2005 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Glad to see MS step in as the first. I know that in the south, both parties are at fault for this healthcare mess but because both parties pandered to the corporate rightists rather than wisely use and apply their ideologies where it should have counted. There was hardly a thing the rightwing ideology would have solved but created more of the same as far as the healthcare mess is concerned of course. Kudos to the Democrats who stood boldly and didn't make the mistake of moving to the "center".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

women in the media
Posted by: ooki on Nov 10, 2005 9:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just read two stories on Alternet, this one, and Commander in Chic, about how women in politics are reduced to feminine stereotypes in the media.
Jennifer L. Pozner was able to point out how ridiculous it is to mention the dress size of women in politics, and Kathleen Sharp uses "petite" to describe a nurse protesting Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Is it okay to use dress size when trying to get the reader to sympthize with women? Would it be okay that she was interrogated if she were Amazonian?
Obviously, more needs to be done to get journalists on the same page on this issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: women in the media :ooki Posted by: Basenjis
I can't believe it
Posted by: popsicle67 on Nov 10, 2005 11:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I used to think that California was lucky to have Arnold but I realize that he has a serious brain deficiency. Didn't his wife tell him not to mess with women? I believe her to be a very intelligent person so I must conclude that she did, he didn't listen. Well the good news is he won't screw up like that again.
This of course bodes well for California as you will not see any more ill-concieved dreck such as was offered to the voters this time. One can expect a more circumspect leader in the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I can't believe it Posted by: krose
Corporate Logo
Posted by: coyote on Nov 10, 2005 11:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arnold was never an actor. I have seen his movies and there is no evidence of acting.

He is a Brand Name. That has always been his objective. The people of California have foolishly elected a Corporate Logo to the office of Governor. They might as well have elected Joe Isuzu, the Budwieser Frogs or Joe Camel.

A logo is a tool. Unfortunately this one does not belong to the State Of California, it is someone elses tool.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They came for me
Posted by: drmeow on Nov 10, 2005 4:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What struck me about this story was how no single group did anything to support the nurses until their unique group was also threatened. This is one of the problems in our society today that makes it easier for the right wing to succeed in their agenda ... the failure to recognize that what "they" do to others not only is what "they" can do to you but also affects you even it "they" don't do it to you. Lincoln fan captured part of that with the statement, "The whole middle class benefited by their activity, not only their members." I was totally excited by the vote results in CA but I would have been more excited reading this article if I'd seen that the machinists union, or communication workers, or (fill in your favorite unionized group) got involved even though no law was going to affect them directly. Something like that would have REALLY given me some hope for this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: They came for me Posted by: RevRick
Arnie for who he is
Posted by: jenvon on Nov 10, 2005 4:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder how many people remember that years ago while he was still a body builder, Arnie went on TV and said that he had 3 major goals. The first was to get into movies, which he did. The second was to marry into a rich family. The third was to become the President of the United States. Well, he has accomplished two of them. He sees the governorship of California as a stepping stone to achieve his goals. Too bad his wife didn't realize that he used and is still using her to betray her family's legacy of liberality, by teaming up with that nazi -like man, who can't conceal his misogyny. He's trying to do what Ronald Reagan did--use his popularity as a movie star to get elected as governor and then as President. I hope people will be able to see what Arnie is trying to do and stop him in his tracks. Now, his next step will be to try and get the law changed so that a foreiger will be able to run for President. Pay attention and watch the Terminator and Kindergarten Cop. Don't be fooled!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Arnie for who he is Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Arnie for who he is Posted by: drmeow
A Californian's Take on the Election
Posted by: SFRosalyne on Nov 10, 2005 10:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Uh, Ah-nold - is that a large footprint I see on your keister, and are those crow feathers I see stuck between your pearly whites? Oh, by the way, there's a crew of nurses outside your office door reminding you it is time for your suppository.

I never knew suppositories were so *HUGE* and looked like pineapples!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ECLECTICIST, S. JIM RODRIGUEZ
Posted by: SJR505 on Nov 11, 2005 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Kennedys must be turning in their graves...Anrnie "The Big Buffoon" forgot his lines and was trying to emulate his idol, Bush 43, heroics - arrogance, ignorance, and his own "Turd Blossom" approach to politics...Arnie believed Bush 43's rhetoric such as :

"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." -- George Bush, "President Participates in Social Security Conversation in New York," May 24, 2005.

However, the differnce between the two "Monsters of the Midway " is that Bush was born with a "Silver foot in his mouth" and Arnie with "Sauerkraut " in his mouth...

S...JIM...RODRIGUEZ+++EL ECLECTICIST+++
3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Public Employee Appreciate
Posted by: KPelley on Nov 11, 2005 7:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a public employee, I bow deeply to these nurses who saved my pension. Ever since Prop 13 passed in California, we hard working bureaucrats have been the right wing's favorite place to dump. Thanks to the nurses, firefighters, law enforcement, and other public employees, we may be getting a little respect. I love my job as a Social Worker Supervisor who works with the homeless and I see myself as serving not only the poor but also all of Califonians. My staff works tirelessly with homeless people, including families to try to get them homed, health care, mental health care, and so on. Thank you for helping us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clarence
Posted by: clarence on Nov 19, 2005 10:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corporatists say that union members should have to actively choose that their dues money go to political campaigns (rather than have the opportunity to actively choose not to).
Some say that in that case shareholders should have the right to opt out of corporate funds going to campaigns.
I say, the money corporations spend on campaigns doesn't come from the shareholders, it comes from us the unwilling customers. So if I want to support a position Exxon is lobbying for, I should be required to sign a form volunteering an extra penny a gallon to that effort. Think that would change the political landscape?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah California nurses!
Posted by: rebeers01 on Nov 22, 2005 6:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great job California!!

If only the ANA (American Nurses Association) would stop bad-mouthing the CNA (California Nurses Association) and start learning from these nurses that are making a difference.

With literally millions of registered nurses in this country, if we would organize, we would be an unstoppable force... universal health care, safer hospitals, better public health, real sex education....

Imagine, a healthy nation!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good Writing
Posted by: anothername on Nov 30, 2005 3:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Ms. Sharp: Would you please take up the formal teaching of journalism? It was a pleasure to read a news report that, almost, started with key pieces of information, instead of what has become the required case study lede, e.g., "Joe Smith didn't think anything about the lump in is head until he met Rose Ann." (I would have dumped the first paragraph, it was not relevant to the article and was misleading. I thought the article was going to be yet another ho-hum item about how women are just so misunderstood, instead of the article about workers, activists, and the power of democracy when the people and not the government define it. I did not appreciate the initial emphasis being about women apparently acting in such an unusual manner for if it were not an unusual matter that women stand up and fight, would there be news to the action? Although, I did appreciate the sentence noting that most nurses are women; but, that sentence would have been stronger had it included a percentage, instead of the over used "most" or "many.") Furthermore, despite certain ideologically-defining adjectives being used, the article gave a straightforward account of events and reaction. I also must note that the nurses helped my heart beat with less irritation by using proper punctuation on the banner they flew over Scharzenegger's head (pun intended).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sw
Posted by: aleks on Oct 2, 2006 12:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I liked your site. Looking here Mohair sweater = Mohair sweater...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]