COMMENTS: 39
The Woman Behind Arnold's Defeat
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
On Tuesday, Nov. 8, every one of California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's pet initiatives failed, in large part because of Rose Ann DeMoro, the chief executive of the California Nurses Association (CNA). She and her 65,000-member union spent most of this year building a broad-based populist movement that the once-powerful governor tried to dismiss with glib one-liners.
Certainly, one reason Schwarzenegger's initiatives failed was widespread anger over his $70 million "special" election. Lengthening the probationary period before teachers can qualify for tenure (Prop. 74), weakening the unions (Prop. 75), bypassing elected lawmakers on fiscal matters (Prop. 76) and privatizing the redistricting process (Prop. 77) were not going to solve California's financial problems.
But voters may not have gotten this message if it weren't for DeMoro and her indefatigable nurses. Early on they stressed that Schwarzenegger's election was a corporate power grab at the expense of California workers. The nurses hammered home this message almost daily, even when they risked being ostracized. As Lou Paulson, head of the California Professional Firefighters, said: "Rose Ann and the nurses showed us that the emperor had no clothes."
Their activism started last November, after Schwarzenegger suspended key portions of the state's nurse-to-patient ratio to help hospital chains. "That really angered us," says DeMoro. But the nurses protested tentatively, almost timidly, until one pivotal day last December.
While the governor addressed a state convention of 10,000 women, a few nurses unfurled a protest banner that read "Hands Off Patient Ratios." Schwarzenegger grinned for the TV cameras, then said: "Pay no attention...to the special interests. I am always kicking their butts." DeMoro was outraged. "For the Governor to denigrate nurses -- a historically female profession -- while speaking to an audience of women is an affront to women everywhere," she told CNN. Because Schwarzenegger had shut them out of the health-care debate, the nurses decided to take their case to the streets.
"We were told to not make waves, that the people of California would turn against us to support their popular governor," DeMoro says. At the time, Schwarzenegger had a 65-percent approval rating, along with fawning cover stories in Fortune and Vanity Fair magazines.
Even so, the nurses continued marching while the state's firefighters, teachers and law enforcement unions watched from the sidelines. DeMoro rented a plane to buzz wealthy guests at the governor's gated Brentwood mansion during his Super Bowl Sunday party. The nurses flew it over Wall Street while the governor held a $10,000-a-plate fundraiser there. They dogged him in Chicago at a lavish fundraiser, flying a banner that read "Don't Be Big Business' Bully."
When the governor reneged on his oft-repeated promise to restore $2 billion to education cuts in February, students and teachers joined the nurses. They gathered with pickets one rainy day at a Sacramento theater where the governor was about to watch the premiere of Get Shorty 2. But when nurse Kelly Di Giacomo was whisked out of the movie line and into a back room, protestors grew worried. The governor's security team grilled the petite nurse for over an hour until she finally asked why they considered her a threat. One of Schwarzenegger's bodyguards pointed to her scrubs and explained. "You're wearing a nurse's uniform."
"Oh, sure," she said, drolly. "The international terrorist uniform." That intimidating experience emboldened the nurses, whose protests began attracting media attention. By spring, TV news cameras were moving their soft-lens focus from Schwarzenegger to the growing crowds of angry workers, most of them women.
In March, Schwarzenegger's popularity dropped to 55 percent, and a California court ruled that the governor had indeed broken the law by suspending the state's nurse-ratio regulation. By then, however, the governor was trying to gut California firefighters' and police officers' pensions, mimicking a Bush administration proposal.
That effort galvanized the conservative law enforcement community to join DeMoro's ranks for the first time. That spring, firefighters joined a crowd of 4,000 nurses, parents, teachers, and state employees to object to the governor's rash of cuts to middle- and lower-class programs.
By April, even die-hard Republicans were growing wary of the governor's company. When former Secretary of State George Shultz showed up for an Arnold fundraiser in San Francisco, he was visibly shaking as 5,000 booing protestors met him in front of the Ritz Carlton Hotel.
Hotel workers later reported that 80 percent of the $100,000 seats went empty that day. "I'm convinced that the protestors scared them away," said CNA organizer Shum Preston.
By summer, the folly of holding a special election seemed obvious, but DeMoro didn't let up. In August, CNA nurses flew to Boston to protest Schwarzenegger as he tried raising election funds by re-selling three dozen Rolling Stones tickets in his sky-box for $100,000 each.
Picketing CNA nurse Stephen Ingersoll couldn't afford a ticket to the Fenway Park concert, but he stood outside and calmly explained his, and CNA's position to Boston reporters. A group of non-union nurses were so impressed with his aplomb, they asked Ingersoll: "How do you guys do this?"
It's simple, he told them: "When there's an issue that needs to be debated, we just go to the streets."
By September, DeMoro and the nurses were inviting workers of all stripes to join them, which attracted some Hollywood guild members. Documentary filmmaker Robert Greenwald (Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price), Oscar-winning actor Sean Penn and movie actress Annette Bening attended the nurses' convention in September, where Warren Beatty had asked to be the keynote speaker. "We're fighting star power with star power," said DeMoro. By the time Beatty lent his voice to CNA ads that ran up to election day, Schwarzenegger's ratings had sunk to a low of 37 percent.
"Instead of attacking the real problems of our schools, Schwarzenegger attacked school teachers," Beatty said. "Instead of attacking the cost of healthcare, he attacked nurses. Instead of increasing our safety, he attacked police and firefighters."
That tactical mistake cost Schwarzenegger his special election initiatives and turned California's nurses into grassroots heroes in other parts of the country.
Nurses in Illinois, Massachusetts, Arizona and Mississippi have asked DeMoro for help in challenging the growing clout of corporate hospital chains and other states' anti-worker initiatives. To be effective, the CNA has created a subsidiary called the National Nurses Organizing Committee, which allows it to organize nurses outside of the Golden State. This fall, the NNOC welcomed 2,000 Chicago nurses into their fold, and it anticipates more members by year's end.
As for Schwarzenegger, he's lost more than his special election. He's managed to squander his once-bright political future and to jeopardize the pro-business platforms of other Republican leaders in outlying blue states. And all because of a woman.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Smiggsy on Nov 10, 2005 12:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Advice - Don't quit your day job (which was being a gym monkey more over than being an actor).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Didn't Arnie once act as the worst school teacher?
Posted by: stoney13
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 10, 2005 4:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: People power
Posted by: crusty
» RE: People power
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: People power
Posted by: crusty
» RE: People power
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hirondelle on Nov 10, 2005 5:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally, some Americans are waking up from a long sleep and coming to their senses. The Calfornia nurses have stopped and looked up from their busy lives and realized; corporate dominance of decisions that affect our lives and do not benefit the guy on the street, need to be stopped. As do dangerous political decisions, a la Bushites.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Shorebird on Nov 10, 2005 6:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Nov 10, 2005 7:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought it was a ballot initiative that would have required unions to get permission--consent by choice--from an employee to use HIS/HER union dues for political purposes.(???)
Wait...unless the unions were able to convince the electorate that PERMISSION--consent by "CHOICE"--equates to "WEAKNESS". (How much do ya think that cost???)
Thus, it would seem, this ballot initiative was a resounding defeat for both Arnold and the Pro-Choice movement. But hey, don't get me wrong--the people have spoken, and nothing brings a Jeffersonian tear of approval to my eye like a ballot initiative.
Just don't act too surprised if the popular electorate-based defeat of a truly Pro-Choice ballot initiative comes around to bite folks in the privates...
...regarding "other" issues, in other places.
But don't think about that--be happy today because a rather silly and already ineffective Republican governor looks a little more silly and ineffective. HAR! Take a while and be happy, but don't forget to worry about what other states (states that are also contemplating going to a ballot-initiative system) are saying about the rejection of Pro-Choice by popular vote of the electorate.
Gorsh and gee-whillickers, people: democracy in action is sometimes a strange animal. It can trample like an elephant and kick like a mule.
As a side note: there are parties out there with platforms other than "defeating ________________". (Fill in the blank with Fascist Nazi Republican if you're a nutso Democrat, or with NancyBoyWeakOnTerror Democrat if you happen to be of the nutso Republican party.)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Oh my. A defeat for Arnold and Pro-Choice in Kaleeforneeah.
Posted by: bpetrone
» RE: Oh my. A defeat for Arnold and Pro-Choice in Kaleeforneeah.
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Oh my. A defeat for Arnold and Pro-Choice in Kaleeforneeah.
Posted by: ScottP
» You misunderstand the current situation and what was proposed...
Posted by: RevRick
» RE: Oh my. A defeat for Arnold and Pro-Choice in Kaleeforneeah.
Posted by: simplisticton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ScottP on Nov 10, 2005 8:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The so called "once-bright political future" was actually winning the election with only 35% of the vote, followed by popularity based on stardom and not rocking the boat. As soon as he started doing something everyone realized he was as much a creep in real life as he is in his violent movie roles or when he drives one of his Dummers.
If we continue to worship stars, be they macho male actors or thoughtful and caring women, we will continue to get screwed. It is high time to emphasize policy and action, and then when politicians make great speeches but stab us in the back, they won't get re-elected, like Pete Wilson (former 2 term governor and advisor to Arnold) did, and Reagan did, and W did...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: May we please get past hero worship?
Posted by: liberalibrarian
» RE: May we please get past hero worship? Re: liberalibrarian
Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: May we please get past hero worship?
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: krose on Nov 10, 2005 9:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: HOW DUMB IS HE?
Posted by: jwg
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 10, 2005 9:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ooki on Nov 10, 2005 9:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jennifer L. Pozner was able to point out how ridiculous it is to mention the dress size of women in politics, and Kathleen Sharp uses "petite" to describe a nurse protesting Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Is it okay to use dress size when trying to get the reader to sympthize with women? Would it be okay that she was interrogated if she were Amazonian?
Obviously, more needs to be done to get journalists on the same page on this issue.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: women in the media :ooki
Posted by: Basenjis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: popsicle67 on Nov 10, 2005 11:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This of course bodes well for California as you will not see any more ill-concieved dreck such as was offered to the voters this time. One can expect a more circumspect leader in the future.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I can't believe it
Posted by: krose
Comments are closed-
Posted by: coyote on Nov 10, 2005 11:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He is a Brand Name. That has always been his objective. The people of California have foolishly elected a Corporate Logo to the office of Governor. They might as well have elected Joe Isuzu, the Budwieser Frogs or Joe Camel.
A logo is a tool. Unfortunately this one does not belong to the State Of California, it is someone elses tool.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drmeow on Nov 10, 2005 4:05 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: They came for me
Posted by: RevRick
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jenvon on Nov 10, 2005 4:07 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Arnie for who he is
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Arnie for who he is
Posted by: drmeow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SFRosalyne on Nov 10, 2005 10:45 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I never knew suppositories were so *HUGE* and looked like pineapples!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SJR505 on Nov 11, 2005 5:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." -- George Bush, "President Participates in Social Security Conversation in New York," May 24, 2005.
However, the differnce between the two "Monsters of the Midway " is that Bush was born with a "Silver foot in his mouth" and Arnie with "Sauerkraut " in his mouth...
S...JIM...RODRIGUEZ+++EL ECLECTICIST+++
3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: KPelley on Nov 11, 2005 7:15 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: clarence on Nov 19, 2005 10:10 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some say that in that case shareholders should have the right to opt out of corporate funds going to campaigns.
I say, the money corporations spend on campaigns doesn't come from the shareholders, it comes from us the unwilling customers. So if I want to support a position Exxon is lobbying for, I should be required to sign a form volunteering an extra penny a gallon to that effort. Think that would change the political landscape?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rebeers01 on Nov 22, 2005 6:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If only the ANA (American Nurses Association) would stop bad-mouthing the CNA (California Nurses Association) and start learning from these nurses that are making a difference.
With literally millions of registered nurses in this country, if we would organize, we would be an unstoppable force... universal health care, safer hospitals, better public health, real sex education....
Imagine, a healthy nation!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: anothername on Nov 30, 2005 3:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aleks on Oct 2, 2006 12:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Smiggsy on Nov 10, 2005 12:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Advice - Don't quit your day job (which was being a gym monkey more over than being an actor).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Didn't Arnie once act as the worst school teacher?
Posted by: stoney13
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 10, 2005 4:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: People power
Posted by: crusty
» RE: People power
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: People power
Posted by: crusty
» RE: People power
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hirondelle on Nov 10, 2005 5:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally, some Americans are waking up from a long sleep and coming to their senses. The Calfornia nurses have stopped and looked up from their busy lives and realized; corporate dominance of decisions that affect our lives and do not benefit the guy on the street, need to be stopped. As do dangerous political decisions, a la Bushites.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Shorebird on Nov 10, 2005 6:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Nov 10, 2005 7:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought it was a ballot initiative that would have required unions to get permission--consent by choice--from an employee to use HIS/HER union dues for political purposes.(???)
Wait...unless the unions were able to convince the electorate that PERMISSION--consent by "CHOICE"--equates to "WEAKNESS". (How much do ya think that cost???)
Thus, it would seem, this ballot initiative was a resounding defeat for both Arnold and the Pro-Choice movement. But hey, don't get me wrong--the people have spoken, and nothing brings a Jeffersonian tear of approval to my eye like a ballot initiative.
Just don't act too surprised if the popular electorate-based defeat of a truly Pro-Choice ballot initiative comes around to bite folks in the privates...
...regarding "other" issues, in other places.
But don't think about that--be happy today because a rather silly and already ineffective Republican governor looks a little more silly and ineffective. HAR! Take a while and be happy, but don't forget to worry about what other states (states that are also contemplating going to a ballot-initiative system) are saying about the rejection of Pro-Choice by popular vote of the electorate.
Gorsh and gee-whillickers, people: democracy in action is sometimes a strange animal. It can trample like an elephant and kick like a mule.
As a side note: there are parties out there with platforms other than "defeating ________________". (Fill in the blank with Fascist Nazi Republican if you're a nutso Democrat, or with NancyBoyWeakOnTerror Democrat if you happen to be of the nutso Republican party.)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Oh my. A defeat for Arnold and Pro-Choice in Kaleeforneeah.
Posted by: bpetrone
» RE: Oh my. A defeat for Arnold and Pro-Choice in Kaleeforneeah.
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Oh my. A defeat for Arnold and Pro-Choice in Kaleeforneeah.
Posted by: ScottP
» You misunderstand the current situation and what was proposed...
Posted by: RevRick
» RE: Oh my. A defeat for Arnold and Pro-Choice in Kaleeforneeah.
Posted by: simplisticton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ScottP on Nov 10, 2005 8:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The so called "once-bright political future" was actually winning the election with only 35% of the vote, followed by popularity based on stardom and not rocking the boat. As soon as he started doing something everyone realized he was as much a creep in real life as he is in his violent movie roles or when he drives one of his Dummers.
If we continue to worship stars, be they macho male actors or thoughtful and caring women, we will continue to get screwed. It is high time to emphasize policy and action, and then when politicians make great speeches but stab us in the back, they won't get re-elected, like Pete Wilson (former 2 term governor and advisor to Arnold) did, and Reagan did, and W did...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: May we please get past hero worship?
Posted by: liberalibrarian
» RE: May we please get past hero worship? Re: liberalibrarian
Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: May we please get past hero worship?
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: krose on Nov 10, 2005 9:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: HOW DUMB IS HE?
Posted by: jwg
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 10, 2005 9:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ooki on Nov 10, 2005 9:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jennifer L. Pozner was able to point out how ridiculous it is to mention the dress size of women in politics, and Kathleen Sharp uses "petite" to describe a nurse protesting Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Is it okay to use dress size when trying to get the reader to sympthize with women? Would it be okay that she was interrogated if she were Amazonian?
Obviously, more needs to be done to get journalists on the same page on this issue.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: women in the media :ooki
Posted by: Basenjis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: popsicle67 on Nov 10, 2005 11:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This of course bodes well for California as you will not see any more ill-concieved dreck such as was offered to the voters this time. One can expect a more circumspect leader in the future.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I can't believe it
Posted by: krose
Comments are closed-
Posted by: coyote on Nov 10, 2005 11:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He is a Brand Name. That has always been his objective. The people of California have foolishly elected a Corporate Logo to the office of Governor. They might as well have elected Joe Isuzu, the Budwieser Frogs or Joe Camel.
A logo is a tool. Unfortunately this one does not belong to the State Of California, it is someone elses tool.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drmeow on Nov 10, 2005 4:05 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: They came for me
Posted by: RevRick
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jenvon on Nov 10, 2005 4:07 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Arnie for who he is
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Arnie for who he is
Posted by: drmeow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SFRosalyne on Nov 10, 2005 10:45 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I never knew suppositories were so *HUGE* and looked like pineapples!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SJR505 on Nov 11, 2005 5:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." -- George Bush, "President Participates in Social Security Conversation in New York," May 24, 2005.
However, the differnce between the two "Monsters of the Midway " is that Bush was born with a "Silver foot in his mouth" and Arnie with "Sauerkraut " in his mouth...
S...JIM...RODRIGUEZ+++EL ECLECTICIST+++
3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: KPelley on Nov 11, 2005 7:15 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: clarence on Nov 19, 2005 10:10 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some say that in that case shareholders should have the right to opt out of corporate funds going to campaigns.
I say, the money corporations spend on campaigns doesn't come from the shareholders, it comes from us the unwilling customers. So if I want to support a position Exxon is lobbying for, I should be required to sign a form volunteering an extra penny a gallon to that effort. Think that would change the political landscape?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rebeers01 on Nov 22, 2005 6:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If only the ANA (American Nurses Association) would stop bad-mouthing the CNA (California Nurses Association) and start learning from these nurses that are making a difference.
With literally millions of registered nurses in this country, if we would organize, we would be an unstoppable force... universal health care, safer hospitals, better public health, real sex education....
Imagine, a healthy nation!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: anothername on Nov 30, 2005 3:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aleks on Oct 2, 2006 12:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




