Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bad Boys and Movie Ads

By Maria Luisa Tucker, AlterNet. Posted November 10, 2005.


When it comes to protesting 50 Cent's new gangsta flick, progressive grassroots activists are sounding like Bill O'Reilly. Well, sort of.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Maria Luisa Tucker

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

On Wednesday, rapper 50 Cent's autobiographical flick "Get Rich or Die Tryin" opened amid controversy surrounding the film's advertisements. Billboards depicting 50 Cent (Curtis Jackson) holding a gun in one hand and a microphone in the other have recently prompted protests among residents in minority neighborhoods. Emotional calls for swift action sprouted up independently when the ads went up around the country, and subsequently Paramount Pictures and Clear Channel Billboards removed dozens of signs around Los Angeles and Philadelphia.

In response, 50 publicly questioned how his billboards are different from other movie ads depicting guns. And he has a point.

"Bad Boys II" shows Will Smith holding a gun in almost exactly the same pose, but there were no protests against those billboards. However, community organizers say it's not the same thing at all.

"Martin Lawrence and Will Smith are two comedic actors. Their roles [in 'Bad Boys II'] -- young children know it is nothing but fantasy and make-believe, but 50 Cent is a real-life image," said Najee Ali, director of Project Islamic H.O.P.E. in Los Angeles. "50 Cent represents the worst in gangsta rap. He glorifies gang violence, misogyny, drug and alcohol abuse, and he resonates with young urban males."

The whole thing is somewhat reminiscent of the 2002 Pepsi-Ludacris controversy. Then, Bill O'Reilly called for a Pepsi boycott when the company hired Ludacris as a spokesman. Devoting several episodes of the "O'Reilly Factor" to the topic, O'Reilly cited Ludacris' "vile" lyrics as reason to kick him off Pepsi's roster of talent. Ultimately, Pepsi did fire Luda and O'Reilly got his way. This time, however, the call to action did not come from rich white guys on the right, but rather from people of color who are sick of seeing their neighborhoods depicted as gangsta-central.

Even in New York City, the birthplace of hip hop, Daily News columnist Errol Louis protested the billboards, connecting images of thugs with guns to real homicides in the city's neighborhoods. Philadelphia's opposition to the ads took the same tack. Leading the case against the billboards was Men United for a Better Philadelphia, an anti-violence group comprised primarily of black men.

"In Philadelphia, we are over 350 homicides already this year, and the majority of them are young African-American men," said Mark Harrell, director of Men United. "The images of 50 Cent are placed around schools in the African-American community, and they perpetuate the violence in our community." Like the late Senator C. Delores Tucker, who was both revered and reviled for her crusade against violence and misogyny in gangsta rap, these residents are attempting to control the messages that shape perceptions of black youth; they are primarily concerned about the effect of those messages on their own kids.

If we zoom out and look at the larger picture, a couple interesting things come into view. When it comes to gangsta rappers, O'Reilly, some hardcore "family values" Christian groups, and a number of minority community groups have reacted in similar ways. Among those calling for the removal of the "Get Rich or Die Tryin'" ads are African-American groups concerned with civil rights, anti-violence and oppression. However, the leaders of these organizations fiercely resist any comparison to the Christian Right.

"We are definitely not in the same camp," said Ali of Project Islamic H.O.P.E. "Certainly we ascribe to the moral elements that some conservatives do have, but our group also has a social leaning as far as feeding the homeless and serving the disadvantaged that conservatives don't have."

Men United's Harrell agreed: "I think what we are doing is very specific to our mission. We try to stay in our lane and we don't cloud the issue," he said. "We are specific about the fact that our mission is to reduce homicides and violence, that's why we are constantly out in the streets."

While they may occasionally have similar targets, the African-American community groups and right-wing conservatives definitely have different missions in mind. While the right-wing American Family Association and Pro-Life Action League are currently boycotting a doll company, Project Islamic H.O.P.E. is protesting racist language. On Monday, the Project began a letter-writing campaign to request that "Boondocks" creator Aaron McGruder stop using the N-word in his television cartoon series.

"It is a racist and vile word," said Ali. "Being African-American, I know that in our history in America when slaves and blacks were lynched, what they often heard last as they lay at the end of the rope was the N-word." His moral argument has so far not swayed the cartoonist, but Ali has hopes that appealing to his conscious will work eventually.

So, while the Christian Right continues to believe it has a corner on morality, the Islamic (and African-American) Left is moving in -- albeit in a kinder, gentler way.

Digg!

Maria Luisa Tucker is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A synospsis. . .
Posted by: NthnBrazil on Nov 10, 2005 3:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
blah blah cencorship is bad unless a progressive group wants to do it blah blah blah (rationalize, justify) blah blah blah besides, when we do it, its nicer blah blah blah when we invoke "moral authority" its justified because its for a good cause blah blah blah . . . . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Didn't read it, did you. Posted by: sausage
» On the contrary. . . . Posted by: NthnBrazil
» RE: On the contrary. . . . Posted by: NthnBrazil
» RE: On the contrary. . . . Posted by: Asses of Evil
» RE: On the contrary. . . . Posted by: Asses of Evil
» RE: On the contrary. . . . Posted by: Asses of Evil
» RE: On the contrary. . . . Posted by: Asses of Evil
Boondocks
Posted by: Samantha Vimes on Nov 10, 2005 3:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If he avoided controversy, he wouldn't have a cartoon. However, the debate will probably find its way into the material, because the creator does substantial political satire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Boondocks Posted by: Deep
» RE: Boondocks Posted by: stoney13
» montana freeman Posted by: montana freeman
» RE: montana freeman Posted by: montana freeman
Bad Boys vs Get Rich
Posted by: sweetlou on Nov 10, 2005 8:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see if I got this straight: Will Smith - whose character is a policeman - is being compared to Small Change, whose character is a thug. Yeah, I can see how those two have equal impact on an impressionable child. One is a public servant who puts his life on the line to protect the rights and safeties of citizens, and the other is a criminal.

I’m all about progressive attitudes, but come on…glorifying street violence is pretty lame…

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bad Boys vs Get Rich Posted by: bqtrain
» RE: Bad Boys vs Get Rich Posted by: nickptar
If we were smart, we wouldn't listen to 'em...or pay 'em.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 10, 2005 9:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Would someone please explain to me why we pay any attention at all to these "gansta" a**holes?! In any sane society, people who make a career out of hurting other people would be where they belong: either in jail or marginalized out of society and off in some corner killing each other. Instead, we here in America, and now throughout the world thanks to one of our "greatest" exports, our "kulture," hand these cretins millions of dollars for creating crap...err...rap that seldom qualifies as music at all. (I did say SANE society, didn't I?...oops...I forgot...I live in America...) It has been a long, sad tumble from Bach and Beethoven to bitches and hoes.

The final irony: those who survive, after listening to this garbage in thousand-watt boom-box cars and SUV's with sound systems pumping out hundreds of decibels of bass, in 20 years of so will not be able to hear ANYTHING, no matter how loud, due to deafness. Anything, that is, except the 24-hour-per-day maddening screech of tinnitus, that other consequence of being hammered by 200-decibel sound for years. (I should know. I suffer because of a few heavy-metal music concerts years ago – and they weren't as loud as some of today's auto sound systems, nor were they blasting day and night.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is not censorship
Posted by: LeslieGem on Nov 10, 2005 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Censorship is done by the government. Civilians putting pressure on a company/organization/etc. is not censorship -- it's freedom of expression.

I support O'Reilly and the organizations mentioned in this article 100%. There's a cancerous culture in the getto that is doing more to limit opportunity for it's residents than racism is -- by a long shot.

When you biggest dream in life is becoming a pimp, it's not racism that's holding you back from getting an education or a job -- it's yourself. I support the folks who are fighting to to change this culture 100%.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

different = bad?
Posted by: yeahright on Nov 10, 2005 10:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in your words "crap...err...rap" barely qualifies as music. that's a pretty broad brush to paint a whole genre with. beethoven and bach most probably barely qualify as music to the target audience of mainstream hip-hop.
not to unfairly tar anyone with the broad brush of racism, but those comments certainly seem to be in bed with judging and applying cultural superiority to the products of Euro-centric society.
ps: just to throw controversy into the mix, Wagner is the soundtrack to Nazism... discuss

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just Another Gun
Posted by: birdman on Nov 10, 2005 10:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem here is in giving Will Smith a free ride. ALL guns send the same message. Just cruise the aisles of the video store and notice how much cover art depicts someone holding a gun. I'll bet it's 50% (not including the children's section). But, hey, we're not a violent society. What's the problem?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Violence is America's Problem, not 50s
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Nov 10, 2005 11:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems we have different standards regarding images in American life. One is the rough/tough/redneck cowboy from the Great Plains-West, and youths from America's inner cities.
One was celebrated with great lore while the other is villified daily.
John Wayne (nee Michael Marion Morrison) and 50 Cent, nee Curtis Jackson, are diametrically opposites who made it big. They lived the American dream-from rags to riches. While one became an actor while the other had a hard life in New York's streets, both became multi-millionaires.
Both became family men, and 50 is tyring to leave his past behind. He has a lot more to lose now.
There are plenty of those questionable billboards in Los Angeles, where I live, and I knew shortly thereafter there would be some reaction to them. But let's face reality, folks: Until Americans find a way to wean themselves from gun violence, we'll continue to have these discussions ad infintum.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Difference from other ads?
Posted by: Asses of Evil on Nov 10, 2005 1:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Didn't seem like a very strong defense from Fiddy. Actually, I'm surprised the gun lobby hasn't chimed in on his behalf. Oh wait, guns don't kill people, people do. But, as Eddie Izzard says, people help. Still, to note that the Bad Boys II billboard was similar isn't much of a defense. Perhaps they did get a pass because it was considered more action-adventure and 50's gained a reputation via his music already. But still, if that's the only way he can defend the advertisement, it's like confessing after a car crash that, well, I was even drunker earlier in the night, the accident could have been that much worse. If 50 really wanted to contrast his ad from other ads then he should have used ads. It's not much of a promotion for his film-well, not to me at least. The ad couldn't be much clearer and it certainly doesn't seem like the sort of billboard that needs to be shouting out to kids and teens in cars everywhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Its not 50 cent
Posted by: humstein on Nov 10, 2005 1:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Issue is White Supremacy as expressed in the entertainment industry.
The fact is that during the 1980s African-Americans rejected the facile nature of disco and started their own brand of music we now call hip-hop. Intitally the music was almost a verbatim report on the conditions in the inner-city. Racism was called out and groups like the Sugar Hill Gang were part of the "Black CNN".
Coming out of the Black is beautiful movement of the 60's and 70's african-americans were continuing their march to freedom and rap was leading the way on the cultural front.

What to do if your a White corporation? Well first up you have two problems. First off you need to control the artists so you can keep them on a string and thereby maximize your profit. Secondly, these corporate types are class and white supremacist conscious. They needed to re-start the minstrel show in order to send out a message - young black men are violent, sexually promiscous and not too smart.
VIOLA- GANGSTA RAP appears!
Do you think all the rappers in the early 90s were gangstas?
Of course not. But these were the guys the White corporate types loved. Now you could have black faces in high places using the N word and telling black woman they were the B word! Meanwhile you didn't have to dirty your hands, while making big profits.
Then Right wing hypocrites like Bill Bennet and Bill O'reilly attacked the rap artists (who do have some level of responsibilty) while leaving the white corporations off the hook. Yet another payday for the white supremacy machine, you get paid when you release these records and your buddies get paid to criticize them!
Untill we end the modern SLAVERY in the entertainment industry will continue to have an endless line of 50 Cent, in addition to talentless white performers like Britney Spears, while the real artists wait tables.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Its not 50 cent Posted by: MEL810
The "vile" N-word
Posted by: daytripper on Nov 10, 2005 3:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is not South Central LA or the tough streets of New York that have a monopoly on the N-word. McGruder uses that word because it is used prevalently all over the U.S. I teach at a University in Texas and as I walk around campus I constantly hear these bright, motivated middle-class black young men (and women) drop the word casually. I don't pretend to have an explanation or a answer. All I can say is that the use of the word crosses socioeconomic lines. It is not just ghetto. Maybe that is McGruder's point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But why?
Posted by: MEL810 on Nov 13, 2005 2:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't call my female friends and neighbors bitch & 'ho. I don't call my white pals (I am white) honky mofo's and I don't call my gay friends queers and faggots. I don't call my Jewish friends kikes or the Irish ones Micks.
I can't understand why anyone of any race, class or age would casually and repeatedly address each other using hate or slur words. Perhaps the one slur word we can call such people, no matter what their ethnicity, is 'stupid.'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who cares?
Posted by: syn7hor on Nov 15, 2005 4:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Noone will watch it anyway. Because it sucks. REALLY REALLY sucks.

Check out the score @ IMDB -> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0430308/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]