Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush Gives Management a Bad Name

By Molly Ivins, AlterNet. Posted November 9, 2005.


Recently released emails from Michael 'Heckuva Job' Brown reveal how horrifically he bungled the Katrina response.
Advertisement

As those silver-tongued poets at the Pentagon put it, we are in a target-rich environment. One cannot -- honestly, one simply cannot -- pass up the Brownie memos.

The e-mails sent to and from Michael "Heckuva Job" Brown, head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency during and after Hurricane Katrina, are too absurd, too please-tell-me-they-made-this-up awful. As Katrina sent a 30-foot wall of water toward Mississippi, Brownie, steeped in disaster relief work at his former job with the International Arabian Horse Association, asked a top aide the burning question: "Tie or not for tonight? Button-down blue shirt?"

Fashion was quite the FEMA priority under Brownie. On the day Katrina hit, his press secretary wrote of his appearance on television: "My eyes must certainly be deceiving me. You look fabulous -- and I'm not talking the makeup." Brownie replied: "I got it at Nordstroms. ... Are you proud of me?"

An hour later, he added: "If you'll look at my lovely FEMA attire, you'll really vomit. I am a fashion god."

After Brownie's appearance with President Bush at a post-Katrina press conference, the press aide spotted an emergency: "Please roll up the sleeves of your shirt, all shirts. Even the president rolled his sleeves to just below the elbow. ... You just need to look more hardworking. ... ROLL UP THE SLEEVES."

The only FEMA worker in New Orleans in the first days after the hurricane was Marty Bahamonde, who e-mailed Brownie describing the situation as "past critical": people dying, food gone, water going, the homeless and hungry massing in the streets. Brownie replied: "Thanks for the update. Anything specific I need to do or tweak?"

Thanks for the update? Anything I need to tweak?

Three hours after receiving this message about hunger and thirst in New Orleans, Brownie's aide was on the food case, e-mailing colleagues on the need to free up enough time in the director's schedule for him to have dinner because restaurants in Baton Rouge were crowded and "he needs more than 20 or 30 minutes."

This prompted Bahamonde to e-mail a co-worker, "I just ate an MRE (military rations) and crapped in the hallway of the Superdome along with 30,000 other close friends, so I understand her concern about busy restaurants."

I guess all that would be a lot funnier if it weren't for what the Pentagon poets call "collateral damage." But at least we don't have to worry about Brownie: The administration signed him up as a $148,000-a-year consultant to FEMA.

Our chief executive is a graduate of Harvard Business School, and his Cabinet is studded with former CEOs. This was supposed to be the "management administration" -- government was to be run like a big business, meetings would start on time, not like those slack Clinton years. These folks are giving management a bad name.

Back in Iraq, the $30 billion appropriated for the reconstruction of Iraq is running out. According to a New York Times article on the report by the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, "Officials in charge cannot say how many planned projects they will complete, and there is no clear source for the hundreds of millions of dollars a year needed to operate the projects that have been finished. ... (The report describes) an array of projects that went awry, sometimes astonishingly, like electrical substations that were built at great cost but never connected to the country's electrical grid."

After two-and-a-half years and $30 billion, electricity in Baghdad is on intermittently, just as it was two-and-a-half years and $30 billion ago.

So you figure, "Of course nothing's getting done -- there's an insurgency, the country's sliding into chaos." Let's look to Afghanistan, where peace reigns. How goes the rebuilding there? Oops. According to The New York Times, a New Jersey company got the contract to build 96 health clinics and schools by September 2004. To date, nine clinics and two schools have been completed and passed inspection.

The company told the Times it is hard to get good help in Afghanistan -- they have to use Afghani construction companies. After four years of reconstruction in Afghanistan, the United States has spent $1.3 billion, and according to American and Afghani sources, nobody's sure where the money is and how it's been spent -- and the net result is between unimpressive and pitiful. The agency in charge, the U.S. Agency for International Development, says things are moving right along and defends its programs.

One of the funnier legacies of the Nixon administration was an accounting award named after Maurice Stans, a secretary of commerce and chairman of the finance committee for Nixon's re-election, who kept suitcases of cash in his office and pled guilty to five misdemeanors relating to mishandling money. In that fine tradition, the Bushies should establish a management award named the Heckuva Job Brownie Prize. It would go to the person who makes the best suggestion for improving government management -- like, "Roll up your sleeves, it makes you look like you're working."

Digg!

Molly Ivins writes about politics, Texas and other bizarre happenings.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
just par for the course for this administration
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Nov 9, 2005 12:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article and I makes you wonder where Bush was when he was getting his MBA. He must have had a look alike get it for him or it came out of a box crackerjacks. What does this man do besides lie, cheat and steal the American people of their democratic rights and lower masses of their money to give to his other MBAs in highest paid positions in our top corporations?

I wonder if Bush even has horses or cows on his ranch that he rolls up his sleeve to cut brush for his various photo opts. At least Reagan rode horses, though with an English saddle, when he had his photo opts as he riding fence to see where it need to be fixed. He was more of a cowboy then this MBA who rides a mountain bike.

When in South American he said we do not torture prisoners, while Chaney is demanding a torture option for the CIA and there is a big story on the front pages about hidden prisons in other countries that the CIA already uses for torturing. Too bad no one ever told these people that had to tell the turth once in a while for us to believe them some of the time. No matter how many times you say it Mr. President no one believes you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Right on, Molly...
Posted by: adp3d on Nov 9, 2005 3:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...this creep Brownie has the audacity to be incensed by the questioning before the congressional(Republican) committee and try to deflect any kind responsibility. And that bastard Chertoff is keeping him on the payroll. Why are these guys still in office?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ight on, Molly... Posted by: omatravel
great article...
Posted by: philame on Nov 9, 2005 3:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as always!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Molly's a Hero
Posted by: samo on Nov 9, 2005 4:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Molly Ivins remains, and will go down in history, as a national hero. If only everyone in the country had read "Shrub" before the 2000 election.
If there's one person in the world I could meet, to express my appreciation for her 30 years of common-sense conviction and important work, it would be her.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Molly's a Hero Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Molly's a Hero Posted by: Prudie Orr
Too Funny!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 9, 2005 4:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If this doesn't prove once and for all what a monumental mistake it was to send this asshole to the White House nothing will. When they finally do a movie about this administration it will be a black comedy. I mean, think about it! As tragic as all of this is, you can't help admitting that it's also hilariously funny! As a matter of fact, that's the only - and I mean ONLY - bright side of this administration. I have always said that Jack Kennedy was our funniest president but George W. Bush has replaced him in my book. Yet the difference between Dubya and JFK is that Kennedy was a genuinely witty guy and Bush is....well, let's face it, Bush is just a fucking idiot.

In his new book, Man With Out A Country, Kurt Vonnegut says that he's planning on suing the makers of Pall Mall cigarettes. For over forty years they have placed a warning on the package that says the product will kill him. Forty two years later, he's still alive. "I never wanted to be alive at a time when the three most powerful people in the world were named Dick, Bush and Colin"

You've got to admit it; These jackasses are as entertaining as they come.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I know! Posted by: philame
» RE: Too Funny! Posted by: rotorooter
» RE: Too Funny! Posted by: jwg
» lay off.... Posted by: gltirebiter
» RE: lay off.... Posted by: rotorooter
» RE: lay off.... Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Too Funny! Posted by: LPB
» RE: Too Funny! Posted by: Apeng1
» RE: Too Funny! Posted by: deha
I refer to it as...
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Nov 9, 2005 6:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Mismanagement by Objective."

They set out to destroy the government and are doing a "heck of a job" at it.

Problem is, it blows up in their faces every time people need government and it isn't there. Anyone remember the government shutdown ten years ago?

Well it blew up in their face and set the stage for Clinton to regain momentum and go on to swamp Dole in 1996.

Don't you throw me in that briar patch dubya!

New on EWM: “Operation Choke the Chicken”
DHS won’t be caught with its pants down by Avian Flu

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Amen Chorus
Posted by: jenbeca on Nov 9, 2005 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good management requires knowledge (accurate, not slanted), an ability to listen, and a willingness to say "I don't know. Let's find out more before we do this." I see zero evidence of those basic skills in most of this administration -- even from those whose prior experience would have led one to believe they possessed them. Either they are idiots, or totally intent on destroying government to prove it can't work, or so selfish they really don't care about anyone except themselves and their friends. Some seem to be all of these.

It is not just management they give a bad name; it is American values, democracy, and human decency. A debate about whether it is OK to torture prisoners was unthinkable a few years ago, and should be now. That we have reached such a place is a testiment to our fears, and the Bush administration's willingness and ability to play on those fears.

They shame us, but at least some part of this country agrees with them, as it did with segregation, denying women the right to vote, using violence to prevent the formation of unions, etc. They represent the worst of us, but they are part of this country, and somehow we must find a way to turn toward our best, not our worst instincts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Amen Chorus Posted by: earthmom11
And don't forget the elections across the country in addition to VA and NJ
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 9, 2005 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George W. Bush becomes an electoral albatross

That alone shows people from red and blue states disgusted with Bush's mismanagement in addition to his party that's so used to hiring unqualified puppets as leaders while those behind the scenes run the country to the ground.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Disregard fashion statements
Posted by: mdwoade on Nov 9, 2005 8:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I feel that the statements about Brown's wardrobe should not even be mentioned. If he had been doing a great job, discussing ties and shirts would have been a little comic relief in a time of disaster. It is the other statements that show the total disconnect. Brown obviously did not understand the gravity of the situation, and he was more concerned with his own comfort than doing his job. What baffles me is why he was kept on as an advisor after he resigned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: why he was kept on Posted by: mwildfire
Management has given itself a bad name for a long time
Posted by: ScottP on Nov 9, 2005 9:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"These folks are giving management a bad name" seems like a strange comment to someone who has been in the workforce since the 1970's. It seems like it is getting worse, but I might just be getting more observant. There are the blatant ones like Enron and Tyco. But one can find examples where ever one looks.

For example, who are these managers at newspapers who hire these people they call jounalists to write these things they call articles? For example, on the front page of yesterday's LA Times, an article on the rebellion in France states that unemployment among youth in one of the effected areas is over 50%, and the very next sentence calls the same area a "working class" area. Which is it, an area dominated by unemployment or an area of workers? Or how about the NY Times management, who hired and retained Judy Miller when she was an obvious liar?

Or should we look at Ford management, who are driving their company towards extinction by focusing on SUVs as we pass peak oil? Or Microsoft, who gleefully destroyed the secure and reliable computing industry to satisfy their greed? Or whomever is the repugnant manufacturer of MK77 incendiary bombs (napalm)? Or the maker of depleted uranium artillery? Or Halliburton? What respectable person would participate in such debauchery?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Stats lesson Posted by: Tenebrae
» RE: Stats lesson Posted by: ScottP
It's not mismanagement when it's by design
Posted by: leftylawyer on Nov 9, 2005 11:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one is surprised that KBR got multi-million dollar contracts for post Katrina reconstruction, right?

These em-eff'ers are gettin theirs and for their friends while the gettin is good and that is the primary focus of this administration. They follow the Grover Norquist playbook (starve the federal government and drown it in the bathtub) [unless it interferes with someone making money] while they and their cronies get ultra-rich in the process. "Less government" is codeword for the rich neither paying their fair share nor for the privilege of living in the country that fostered their success.

With that being the primary motivation, everything that follows is intentional.

The only question is why did it take 5 years for all of us to get the rest of america to wake up?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's a new rubric of interpretation for you, Molly.
Posted by: h2oaso on Nov 9, 2005 6:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's along Chomskyan lines: we are in a 1984-style plutocracy (look it up if you don't know what it means, alternet readers) that has far more sinister designs for the US and the world: one, wealth expriopriation from third-world countries; two, creation and destruction of the middle class in the US for power/wealth redistribution; three, highly interlinked government leaders, in both "parties".

That's just the tip of the iceberg. I would watch out for martial law in this country being more or less permanent in the near future, as one following trends involving the US constitution and the Patriot Act [II].

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bad Name My Butt... the Bush Family & Friends R Gangsters
Posted by: TheBuffaloPartycom on Nov 9, 2005 6:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry Butt, the Bush Gang R Killing Earth Citizens

It's Past Time 2 JAIL Em All

DEMAND IMPEACH, NOW, TONIGHT !

There R 15 + Paintings of the Bush Trial etc

We Put Together 5 Years Ago

FREE 2 See, Copy, Send, All Over 2 Help Jail Em

Thank U, now Get Up, Stand Up, JUMP UP

& Yell Out 2 All...

Out, Damn Bush !

More Info At &

www.RogerART.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush Impeachment
Posted by: leftylawyer on Nov 9, 2005 8:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is the end game for an impeachment? If cheney is still vp, he becomes the prez. Is that what you want?

Current order of presidential succession:

Vice President Richard Cheney
Speaker of the House John Dennis Hastert
President pro tempore of the Senate Ted Stevens
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
Secretary of the Treasury John Snow
Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
Secretary of the Interior Gale A. Norton
Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns
Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez (born in Cuba, is ineligible)
Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao (born in Taiwan, is ineligible)
Secretary of Health and Human Services Mike Leavitt
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Alphonso Jackson
Secretary of Transportation Norman Yoshio Mineta
Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman
Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings
Secretary of Veterans Affairs Jim Nicholson
Secretary of Homeland Security4 Michael Chertoff

(In late July 2005, the Senate passed a bill moving the Homeland Security secretary to number 8 on the list. The bill is awaiting House approval)

Unfortunately you cannot impeach an entire administration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush Impeachment Posted by: cyclone
» RE: Bush Impeachment Posted by: Wacre
Warning
Posted by: Unbowed on Nov 10, 2005 5:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Subject: Warning from Centers for Disease Control

The Centers for Disease Control has issued a warning about a new
virulent strain of Sexually Transmitted Disease.

The disease is contracted through dangerous and high-risk behavior. The
disease is called Gonorrhea Lectim (pronounced "gonna re-elect him.").


Many victims contracted it in 2004, after having been screwed for the
past 4 years, in spite of having taken measures to protect themselves
from this especially troublesome disease.


Cognitive sequelae of individuals infected with Gonorrhea Lectim include delusions of grandeur with a distinct messianic flavor; chronic mangling of the English language; extreme cognitive dissonance; inability to accept responsibility for actions; exceptional cowardice masked by acts of misplaced bravado;uncontrolled facial smirking; theocracies; and a strong propensity for
categorical, all-or-nothing behaviors. The disease is sweeping Washington.

Naturalists and epidemiologists are amazed and baffled that this malignant disease originated only a few years ago from a small Texas bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Warning I salute you!!!!! Posted by: stoney13
» RE: Warning Posted by: cyclone
» RE: Warning Posted by: cacky
It is exactly why MBA is wrong
Posted by: Brucewxx on Nov 10, 2005 9:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I disgree on that Bush is giving management a bad name as I think it is exactly why the current MBA concept is wrong. Looking around thos organizations and corporations which are failing you can find most of them are run by those MBA without much real experience. There is a believe in current MBA training that they could manage anything without knowing the business/technical details as long as they know acounting and other management tricks. The reality is that you have to know the stuff you are doing to really manage it and Katrina taught everyone believe otherwise a lesson. I hope American can wake up and throw away this MBA myth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CYCLONE FOR PRESIDENT!!! Posted by: stoney13
So When Do We "Go for the Juggler"?
Posted by: sggoodale on Nov 14, 2005 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is great..I guess...to get more details on how incompetent are some of the persons we paying for. It builds the case for regime change. For now we settle for some personnell reassignments. But aren't we dealing with some VERY SERIOUS stuff here, that implicates most of our Congress(and also US), as well as members of the Bush Administration. I mean, isn't there something called "Congressional oversight?" And isn't it Congress that passes bills and budgets that get this project built, and not that one? And isn't it a violation of one's oath of office to allow high crimes and misdemeanors within our government to go uninvestigated and unprosecuted, to allow "coverups"? Not only do we have the WMD deception, but prior to that, and more sinister, is the complicity of government elements in the 9/11 attacks that fueled our synthetic "war on terror" that has no end. An intelligent individual who examines the credible analyses of the WTC building collapses in New York City, (vs the "cooked books" of the 9/11 Commission), KNOWS that the three WTC buildings collapsed from explosives, controlled demolitions, and NOT because of the two airplane crashes, which were the "false flags" to blame al Quaeda. And an intelligent person who reads about details of the 9/11 timeline, and of our air control and defense systems, KNOWS that for THREE airplanes to penetrate our systems and successfully crash into three major (and protected) landmarks was a virtual impossibility without government complicity.

Every member of Congress has been sent documents which provide evidence that the 9/11 attacks happened very differently than the official government story. There is much information and evidence available about this on the internet, and from the many 911 Truth Commissions that have been held in this country, in Canada and the U.K. So why do most "Progressives" avoid this "mother of all issues" like the plague? Do we not dare to bring out the truth, and to follow through with the consequences? Probably so. Too comfortable still. Insufficient courage. Let's keep the lies in place for our children and grandchildren, so that they might reside like us in "la-la-land", and continue to pay for a government totally programmed for war and domination, while believing we stand for peace and cooperation. Will our denial continue to prevail, and this phony war on terrorism keep destroying families and nations, as well as our own innocent young who sign up for duty?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Molly Ivans Gives Bush a Bad Name - So What's New?
Posted by: wardmd on Nov 14, 2005 1:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reading this thread, one would never know that, for example, New Orleans even HAD a Mayor, or that Louisiana had a Governor, or that the residents, themselves, made conscious (informed) decisions to STAY PUT.

No, everything is "Bush's Fault" - or FEMA should have done this or that better, cheaper, faster.

I've got news for you all... This is NOT the U.S.S.R. (United States Socialist Republic). Believe it or not, YOU (each and every one of YOU) are the "First Responders" for EVERY disaster in your own lives. Followed by the City Government, then the County, then the State, THEN (and only then) is the Federal Government is called upon to be your nanny...

This whole concept that it's The Government's JOB to see to it that nothing bad ever happens to anyone, and if something DOES happen, then it's The Government's RESPONSIBILITY to make everyone WHOLE again - is, simply, ludicrous!

You cry and moan that "The Government" enacts "The Patriot Act" (allegedly taking your freedom [someone, please, enumerate the rights which have been taken away from you (not theoretically, but in actuality)]), then you complain that "The Government" isn't doing enough when YOU want them to take care of you...

Same thing for the electric problem in Iraq... Yes, things are FAR from perfect, there, but let us not lose sight of WHO it is, who is responsible for the bombing of Iraqis standing in line for jobs, or for blowing up the electric lines (I'll give you a hint, it's NOT BUSH, or our Armed Forces) - Yes, boy and girls, it's the "insurgents".

Have ANY of you given any thought to what Iraq might be like (RIGHT NOW) if the "insurgents" were helping to rebuild the country, instead of blowing it up?

But, just like "The Left" in this country - they don't care what the Voters say... They want it THEIR way...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]