COMMENTS: 11
Why the President believes he is the law
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
PRESIDENT BUSH: Our country is at war, and our government has the obligation to protect the American people. The executive branch has the obligation to protect the American people; the legislative branch has the obligation to protect the American people. And we are aggressively doing that. We are finding terrorists and bringing them to justice. We are gathering information about where the terrorists may be hiding. We are trying to disrupt their plots and plans. Anything we do to that effort, to that end, in this effort, any activity we conduct, is within the law. We do not torture. (my emphasis)
Over at the Frameshop, Jeffrey Feldman discusses the implications of the President implying that he is the law as part of a series of posts about the torture scandals (the other two, both worth reading, are here and here.) He states that this view, that the President and his actions are not bound by the Constitution, is wrong and outside of the mainstream. This retort, however, doesn't go far enough.
The frame of being above the law fits well within the right-wing structure of authority (Lakoff's "strict father," for you framing junkies). Tough love, excessive force to prove a point, might makes right, means justify the ends -- these are all part of the ideology. Cowboys and vigilantes (think: Arizona border patrollers) are icons of this accepted frame, and Bush-as-cowboy is certainly nothing new. The problem for progressives is to not reinforce this frame.
We must be structuring our arguments not to say that cowboys and vigilantes are bad people, but to frame them as militant extremists who drool over every chance to use violence as an answer, who are so clouded by a narrow worldview that violence is the only answer for them. To frame them, perhaps controversially, as the Timothy McVeighs of the government.
They are dangerous, violent extremists who are endangering the lives of all Americans with their policies of instutionalized torture and violence, not "bad cowboys" saving the American frontier from the "savages." Don't let them have that frame.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: scroogey on Nov 8, 2005 10:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: shapes of things to come
Posted by: scroogey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lb on Nov 8, 2005 11:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: popsicle67 on Nov 9, 2005 12:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and powers as denoted in the Constitution were because he was taught in school. Now with the proliferation of liberal indoctrination in schools nobody knows that the Constitution means what it says and if you don't like it you have to engage
in a difficult, time consuming, process to change it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: He is being lied to
Posted by: andyc
» Liberal indoctrination
Posted by: churchofone
» Education is suffering.
Posted by: turil
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MPJ on Nov 9, 2005 6:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It looks like Zandt is talking about the Arizona Minutemen. But they intensively train NOT to use violence. The one Minuteman who touched an illegal at all was quickly expelled. The idea that Minutemen "drool over every chance to use violence" is ridiculous.
The opposition to Minutemen just keeps on saying "vigilante" -- just as Bush did -- and ignoring all the facts that prove their slur to be false. Zandt's technique of repeating a false slur doesn't work for her any better than it works for Bush.
It is disgusting to see either side wallow in the trough of lies and name-calling that the Bushies marched into. Our side, including Zandt, should do better, argue better, be better than Bush and his masters.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: turil on Nov 9, 2005 8:18 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need well-framed soundbite type words that counter the violence as policy. "Peace" is right out, since people, for some crazy reason, think peace is dangerous. "Compassionate" and "intelligent" are out as well, since they too are seen as either wussy or elitist. What to we have left? "Creative" is ok, but not terribly compelling as a term. "Responsible" is good and strong, but might be too openended. "Better" might be the best we've got!
Am I missing something good?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Great Tolstoy Novel: War and Better
Posted by: AdamSelene11726
» The Butter Battle Book?
Posted by: turil
Comments are closed-
Posted by: scroogey on Nov 8, 2005 10:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: shapes of things to come
Posted by: scroogey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lb on Nov 8, 2005 11:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: popsicle67 on Nov 9, 2005 12:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and powers as denoted in the Constitution were because he was taught in school. Now with the proliferation of liberal indoctrination in schools nobody knows that the Constitution means what it says and if you don't like it you have to engage
in a difficult, time consuming, process to change it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: He is being lied to
Posted by: andyc
» Liberal indoctrination
Posted by: churchofone
» Education is suffering.
Posted by: turil
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MPJ on Nov 9, 2005 6:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It looks like Zandt is talking about the Arizona Minutemen. But they intensively train NOT to use violence. The one Minuteman who touched an illegal at all was quickly expelled. The idea that Minutemen "drool over every chance to use violence" is ridiculous.
The opposition to Minutemen just keeps on saying "vigilante" -- just as Bush did -- and ignoring all the facts that prove their slur to be false. Zandt's technique of repeating a false slur doesn't work for her any better than it works for Bush.
It is disgusting to see either side wallow in the trough of lies and name-calling that the Bushies marched into. Our side, including Zandt, should do better, argue better, be better than Bush and his masters.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: turil on Nov 9, 2005 8:18 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need well-framed soundbite type words that counter the violence as policy. "Peace" is right out, since people, for some crazy reason, think peace is dangerous. "Compassionate" and "intelligent" are out as well, since they too are seen as either wussy or elitist. What to we have left? "Creative" is ok, but not terribly compelling as a term. "Responsible" is good and strong, but might be too openended. "Better" might be the best we've got!
Am I missing something good?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Great Tolstoy Novel: War and Better
Posted by: AdamSelene11726
» The Butter Battle Book?
Posted by: turil
GOP and Dems Agree: Crack/Powder Cocaine Disparity Unjust and Needs Reform
The FBI Could Be Watching You on Facebook
Why a High-Protein Diet May Make You Fatter




