comments_image -

Why the President believes he is the law

A quick lesson in how to frame this rogue president.
November 8, 2005  |  
 
Advertisement
 

In discussing the most recent round of torture revelations sanctioned by the Bush administration, many are picking up on a phrase that Bush uttered yesterday in his Panama press conference:

PRESIDENT BUSH: Our country is at war, and our government has the obligation to protect the American people. The executive branch has the obligation to protect the American people; the legislative branch has the obligation to protect the American people. And we are aggressively doing that. We are finding terrorists and bringing them to justice. We are gathering information about where the terrorists may be hiding. We are trying to disrupt their plots and plans. Anything we do to that effort, to that end, in this effort, any activity we conduct, is within the law. We do not torture. (my emphasis)

Over at the Frameshop, Jeffrey Feldman discusses the implications of the President implying that he is the law as part of a series of posts about the torture scandals (the other two, both worth reading, are here and here.) He states that this view, that the President and his actions are not bound by the Constitution, is wrong and outside of the mainstream. This retort, however, doesn't go far enough.

The frame of being above the law fits well within the right-wing structure of authority (Lakoff's "strict father," for you framing junkies). Tough love, excessive force to prove a point, might makes right, means justify the ends -- these are all part of the ideology. Cowboys and vigilantes (think: Arizona border patrollers) are icons of this accepted frame, and Bush-as-cowboy is certainly nothing new. The problem for progressives is to not reinforce this frame.

We must be structuring our arguments not to say that cowboys and vigilantes are bad people, but to frame them as militant extremists who drool over every chance to use violence as an answer, who are so clouded by a narrow worldview that violence is the only answer for them. To frame them, perhaps controversially, as the Timothy McVeighs of the government.

They are dangerous, violent extremists who are endangering the lives of all Americans with their policies of instutionalized torture and violence, not "bad cowboys" saving the American frontier from the "savages." Don't let them have that frame.

Deanna Zandt is a contributing editor at AlterNet, and manages Start Making Sense.
submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Alternet Special Coverage - Occupy Wall Street
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Listen to The AlterNet Radio Hour with Naomi Klein, Sarah Posner and Dean Baker!

By Joshua Holland | AlterNet

 
 
San Francisco Police Department Releases 'It Gets Better' Video

By Tara Lohan | AlterNet

 
 
Occupy Protesters Mic-Check Palin During CPAC Speech

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Apple, Accustomed to Profits and Praise, Faces Outcry for Labor Practices at Chinese Factories

By Amy Goodman, Juan Gonzalez | Democracy Now!

 
 
Could Santorum Actually Beat Romney? And Would the Obama Campaign be Ready?

By Steve M. | Booman Tribune

 
 
Bill Moyers: The Economy Has Been Engineered to Screw Over Millennials (With an AlterNet Shoutout!)

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Maher: Conservatives Are the Ones Dividing the Country

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
In Kansas, Is Catholic Church Trying to Destroy A Victim's Advocates Organization?

By Julie Cain | Ms. Magazine Blog

 
 
Obama vs. the Concern Trolls on Nonsense "Religious Liberty" Issue

By Digby | Hullabaloo

 
 
At CPAC, Santorum Surges Despite Idiotic Claims; Romney Poses as 'Severe' Conservative; Gingrich Makes War on GOP

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]