Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Talking the Talk

By Deanna Zandt, AlterNet. Posted November 11, 2005.


The author of a new book on pop language describes how media-driven popular culture is not only changing the way we speak, but maybe even the way we think.
111105_story

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Deanna Zandt

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

"Whaaaassssuuuuuuup?!"

Remember that phrase? Still trying desperately to forget it? Good luck. It's one of the most pervasive pieces of pop language in recent memory. What you might not know, however, is that before it was an advertisement for beer, it was a short film by a young black copywriter in Chicago. The film catalogued the soon-to-be ubiquitous phrase's popularity among filmmaker/copywriter Charles Stone III and his friends for 16 years; Budweiser saw the potential for an advertising hit, bought it, and the rest is pop history.

Oh, and it's actually spelled "Whaazzzaahhhh?!," in case anyone is keeping track.

Stories like this are the subject of Leslie Savan's new book, Slam Dunks and No-Brainers: Language in Your Life, the Media, Business, Politics, and, Like, Whatever. Savan, a former advertising columnist for many years at the Village Voice, is taking on the rugged world of the social application of language. She has produced a work that slides past the sensitivity most people hold to the way they speak and goes for the jugular of exposing pop language for what it is.

Well, what is it, exactly? Savan tackles that question in an excerpt from the book's introduction that AlterNet has published, and it's a question whose answer evolves and changes, depending on who's asking it and when. Savan proposes that this examination is not a strict, finger-wagging criticism of the way we speak, but an exposé of the effects of mass marketing and mass media on the way our brains process and regurgitate information.

Writing about language is a challenge when considering the fact that the subject matter is the essential tool in the explanation. Savan's personal preferences for language are strong themes throughout the book, but nonetheless she succeeds in breaking down complex issues: the Orwellian, "regular guy" vocabulary of the Bush administration, the appropriation and stereotyping of African American dialects and slang, the effects of the digital age on the way we speak, and more.

Savan doesn't pretend to be an expert in any of these areas; she cites numerous sociolinguists and scholars for the research that she bases her theories on. Rather than being an academic exercise or prescriptive diatribe, Slam Dunks and No Brainers is the beginning of a discussion that shows how pop affects our ability to process information, and how we relate to one another in the Age of Inundation.

AlterNet had a chance to speak with Savan about the book in late October 2005.

Where does pop language come from? The media?

Part of what pop language is, is words and phrases that have a glamour or cachet… they're clichés with cachet, you might say. [laughing] It comes from everyday, "regular" people. It doesn't come down to us from media, from advertising agencies and sit-coms. But, once the sit-coms and the ad agencies pick up on how catchy it is, they distribute it and use it more as punchlines. Many of the phrases like "I don't think so" are used as the punchline of an ad.

For example, "no brainer -- " there are whole ads that would spin on the use of the words "no brainer." Dozens of ads and movie trailers, particularly, have turned on "Yessss!" Some of the movie trailer producers would tell me that they were so thankful when there was a "Yessss!" in the movie, because they knew they could produce their whole ad on that "Yessss!" They explained that it very consciously says, "Yes, I'll go see this movie." It makes you one of audience, it builds up the excitement and sort of generalizes without saying what the movie is, what the context is, what the characters are.

Once the media and marketing pick up on the language and then send it back to us "regular people," we pick it up and feel new cachet, new glamour. It connects us to the millions of other people that are saying it, too. Here we get into another aspect of the definition, which is that you are "the crowd" speaking when you speak this language. You seem to have them in the background, on your side, helping you to make the point and winning the moment.

You say in the book that pop language in this sense is a social equalizer, maybe a show of solidarity. How does that happen?

I say that it's a social equalizer, it shows that you have the necessary skills to either mimic, or link to, or be part of that "ideal American personality." That personality is very mainstream, upbeat, ironic here and there when necessary, but also sentimental and heartfelt at other times… it's not just one thing, like everybody's personality, it has many sides. The "regular guy" thing -- the words are "guys," "walk the walk, not just talk the talk," "step to the plate," or just "step up." It's not just an ironic personality.


Digg!

Deanna Zandt is a contributing editor at AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I can only imagine
Posted by: crusty on Nov 11, 2005 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how hard it is to come to this country with no knowlege of english, and try to make sense of it all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I can only imagine Posted by: squadsright
» RE: I can only imagine Posted by: demidesigrrl
Thinking Out of the Box
Posted by: qrswave on Nov 11, 2005 5:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fascinating perspective--truly eye-opening; a book worth reading—at the library.

I don’t mean to diminish its value. I might buy it in a different economy where money isn’t so scarce for laborers like me, while so abundant for financiers and intellectual property owners who earn while sitting idle. But, we this is not that economy.

This article made it clear to me that even our language, which is supposed to be public property (used to facilitate meaningful exchange of ideas and needs) is being appropriated by greedy, entities, and exploited for its ability to make us believe, if only long enough for us to pick their product over someone else’s, that they are one of us. They are not.

“[Pop is] often used, regardless of age, race, ethnic background, occupation, region of the country. Pop . . . is everywhere, [used] to be understood by everybody . . . It connects us to the millions of other people that are saying it”

Pop, as described, sounds like another social connector that we know-- Money-- a currency we all trust and use to exchange our wealth. But, like the pop language that is bought up by greedy individuals, money has also been bought up by a greedy private banking system.

The media exploits our desire and need to communicate and express ourselves by attaching commercial value to our words: “[Pop] connects people . . . [w]e feel more important, and we are in fact more persuasive when we use it.”

They force us to further their private interests every time we use it: “movie trailer producers . . . were so thankful when [it’s used] in the movie, because they knew they could produce their whole ad on [it]”

Similarly, bankers exploit our need for money as a tool with which to exchange the only wealth we have (our labor). Because the money supply is central, by privatizing it and attaching interest to its circulation, they force us to further their interests every time we exchange it among ourselves.

Please, take the author’s advice “The more we talk this way and think this way. . . the more we are stuck inside that box.” So, “stop racing . . . listen . . . and become more aware.”

Learn about the true purpose of money. Visit The Truth Will Set You Free. Together we can live outside the monetary box that is forced upon us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thinking Out of the Box Posted by: liberalibrarian
» Tax Levy Posted by: BlueTigress
I don't feel exploited by the media
Posted by: ScottP on Nov 11, 2005 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But that's because I rarely turn on the TV, I'm selective about what I listen to on the radio, and I don't even see many movies. It's your choice, do you want to give these people your time? I've found that TV virtually always leaves me feeling empty, wondering why I threw away that time, which is a part of my finite life. It never brings me closer to any of my life goals. If I want to listen to someone, why wouldn't that be a friend or relative or neighbor? Or even a stranger, but one that I see face to face rather than an anonymous one hiding behind their TV production?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Excellent Recommendation! Posted by: qrswave
.
Posted by: sui_generis on Nov 11, 2005 12:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I actually heard an old man far out of the pop speech mainstream use the phrase "I can't spare a square" last week.
Unfortunately, it wasn't in a public restroom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So the medium is still the massage? Duh uh
Posted by: Sojourner on Nov 11, 2005 12:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fashion, whether in language or in clothes, is for display. We have no roots nor purpose, so we have no idea what is 'good.' Instead it's all about 'lookin' good.' Purile, adolescent, pap.

How many books did you read last week? Well, ok, buy last week and put aside to read? This blog is a literate medium, for people who can read and write. What's a positive review of the corruption of language, because it's cute, doing here?

If you're paying attention, perhaps you've noticed how 'illiterate' folks have become. On top of that, because tee vee must have 'action,' the models it offers are aggressive, uncaring, insulting, belittling clowns.

I have nothing against clowns so long as they stay in the circus. If kids expect their families to be like tee vee families, no wonder they run away in search of glamor.

Just be sure to be able to provide the bread with those circuses. That way we can watch civilization become uncivilized, but on a full stomach.

Tell me. When does it get to be time to grow up?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Do We Break Out Of It?
Posted by: surfreality on Nov 11, 2005 1:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"First of all, by slowing down and listening. Those are two hard things for us to do, as Americans. One reason we talk this way so much is that our life has become sped up we're all so busy, and all the media and marketing are competing for our attention more ferociously. We need a strong, healthy language that speaks to the power structure of the moment."

This is pure gold.

Slow down and listen. Priceless advice. Thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alas, Babylon
Posted by: h2oaso on Nov 11, 2005 9:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our country and world is going down the shitter. Save yourself and others while it is still possible.

"Slow down and listen" covers the psychological picture, but you still need to know how to live realistically. Aye, there's the rub. Who to follow?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Alas, Babylon Posted by: liberalibrarian
» RE: Alas, Babylon Posted by: boing007
» RE: Alas, Babylon Posted by: Artemis3