Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

An Ounce Of Prevention

By Michael Hammerschlag, AlterNet. Posted November 9, 2005.


If the planners of the war on Iraq had spent even a moment to secure that country's vast conventional weapons stockpile, the insurgency might never have happened.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Michael Hammerschlag

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

There has been much commotion over the lack of armor on Iraq vehicles and vests, but that's always been a trade-off. If you reinforce a HUMV enough to survive an RPG strike, you may make it too heavy to accelerate to avoid getting hit; and full body armor suits are great except when 120 temperatures causes soldiers to collapse from heat prostration.

The far more egregious outrage is why hundreds of thousands of tons of ordnance were allowed to be looted by insurgents in the first place.

The Pentagon admits that a breathtaking 250,000 tons of heavy ordnance (out of 650,000 tons total) -- aircraft bombs, artillery and tank shells, mines, rockets -- were allowed to be looted by our undermanned army in the four-30 weeks after the invasion. That's equivalent to 1 million 500-pound bombs. At 20 250-pound roadside mines or market closeouts a day, that's enough for 274 years of attacks.

"During the fall of 2003, what you would see was Iraqis going in at night, individually and in trucks," US weapons inspector David Kay told U.S. News. "They would pull ordnances out and drive off."

Security was so bad after Saddam Hussein's regime fell, Kay recalled, that his team was often shot at by insurgents when they went to inspect the sites: "There were just not enough boots on the ground, and the military didn't give it a high enough priority to stop the looting. Tens of thousands of tons of ammunition were being looted, and that is what is fueling the insurgency."

In April 2003, David DeBatto, a military counterintelligence officer at massive Camp Anaconda, 50 miles north of Baghdad, found a five-square-mile ammo dump two miles south of the camp which, he says, was "littered with anti-aircraft missiles, land mines, rocket-propelled grenades, plastic explosives." He reported it again and again in written reports to his battalion commander, Lt. Col. Timothy Ryan, even giving him a tour of the dump.

"Local Iraqis told us, 'These guys' -- and they would point to looters in the distance -- 'are fedayeen. They're going to take this and make it into bombs and use it against you,'" DeBatto said in an interview. Nothing was done. "We had enough people. If we had placed four, five, six guys at the main entry to that facility, that would have been enough! Every time I went back there, there was less."

Two other intelligence agents also reported seeing that and many unsecured ammo dumps all over Iraq bursting with deadly material -- all of which were massively looted. "They were wasting people for really menial things: KP, when there were a thousand Iraqis begging to do it for a jug of water. I would have feasts with sheiks and ministers -- when I came back me and my team of counterintelligence special agents would be ... emptying out latrines. Bottom line is they ignored it (because of) a lack of people, ignorance, and ... absolute lack of planning for the occupation. Every day was a new day -- you made it up as you went along," said DeBatto.

Lt. Col. Timothy Ryan's commander from July 2003 was Col. Thomas Pappas, who was convicted of dereliction of duty and relieved for his part in the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal. Pappas had directed Ryan to take no action about the looting.

When questioned about the looting, Donald Rumsfeld famously replied, "Freedom's untidy. And free people are free to commit mistakes, and to commit crimes and do bad things." The looting was "part of the price" for the liberation of Iraq and not uncommon for countries that experience significant social upheaval. Rumsfeld seemed to think the looting was a finger in Saddam's eye and a healthy release of "pent-up feelings that may result from decades of repression."


Digg!

Michael Hammerschlag's articles have appeared in Seattle Times, Columbia Journalism Review, Moscow News and other publications. Read more of his writing on his website, Hammernews.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Then HOW would anyone have been able to make a
Posted by: owlbear1 on Nov 9, 2005 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FORTUNE?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A COMBAT VETERAN WEIGHS IN........
Posted by: kc10ken on Nov 9, 2005 5:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I served honorably for over 13 years in the military including 3 combat tours in the middle east.

I firmly believe that Donald Rumsfeld should be fired and prosecuted for incompetence.

EVERY American death caused by an IED can be directly attributed to Donald Rumsfeld. Even US Army basic trainees can tell you the FIRST thing an Army does when it invades another country is it secures the enemy's military installations including all ammo dumps. This is done to deny your enemy the ability to continue killing you. Our forces, with Donald Rumsfeld in command, were ordered NOT to do this.

Instead, we secured the oil fields. The oil fields were the top priority right from the beginning, which shows what this war is really all about. Such GROSS INCOMPETENCE on Rumsfeld's part is UNACCEPTABLE and our soldiers continue coming home in body bags every day as a direct result of this incompetence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

portly
Posted by: portly on Nov 9, 2005 5:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That huge weapons dump...the one that was (all too) briefly an issue before the 2004 election...was not called the Al Qaeda weapons dump...it was called the Al Qa'Qaa (sp?) weapons dump, i believe...

They brushed it off then and continue to do so. Why does Rummy hate our troops so much?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I agree 100% with kc10ken...
Posted by: NamVeT on Nov 9, 2005 8:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
being a Namvet, when we found a weapons cache we took what we wanted and then blew the fucking thing up! This adventure in Iraq is beyond the definition of incompetence. halibush, cheney, rummy, rove etc. (caps left off intentionally because they don't deserve the respect) should be hung in the public square. And georgie himself has got to be the most idiotic moron ever EVER in politics. The constant look on his face is that of a deer in headlights. How could we ever have elected such a bunch of criminals? IMPEACH NOW...before we have no rights at all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keep your eye on the ball
Posted by: ScottP on Nov 9, 2005 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember, perpetual war is the tactic used to distract the public, the goal is to allow unfettered looting by our own robber barons here at home in the US.

As far as the concept that Rumsfeld is incompetant, I disagree. He has done his job of perpetuating the war magnificently. If he had kept us out of Iraq that wouldn't have facilitated the looting at home. If he had conducted the invasion in such a manner that locals quickly resumed control of their country and we left, that wouldn't have facilitated the looting at home. The most likely purpose of a system is what it actually does, and our military system is creating insecurity and perpetual war, and so we should presume that is the intent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Keep your eye on the ball Posted by: biochick
» RE: Keep your eye on the ball Posted by: cstriker
» RE: Mission Posted by: Captainmagic
The Military Industrial Complex R Us.
Posted by: rabblerowzer on Nov 9, 2005 11:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
>“How could we ever have elected such a bunch of criminals?”<

A lot of posters have been decrying the stupidity of a majority of Americans for supporting the War and the Rabid Right. It’s true that many Americans are too stupid to know their own self-interest , but don’t forget that many millions of Americans are employed by the Military Industrial Complex. Thousands of government contractors supply everything from boots to bombs and everyone from the CEO’s down to assembly line workers profit form perpetual war.

Call me cynical, but considering that making war is our number one industry in America, it’s likely that many voters simply voted their pocketbooks in 2004. Preparing for and waging war is the bedrock of our economy and society, and has been for a long time.

The Military Industrial Complex R Us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Military Industrial Complex R Us. Part 2
Posted by: rabblerowzer on Nov 9, 2005 3:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Military Industrial Complex R Us. Part 2

Most of the great fortunes in America began with war profiteering. Our plutocracy begins programming us at a very early age to become worker and warrior ants. We are livestock to be used in the service of maintaining and increasing their wealth and power. Boys and now girls are trained in sport activities which emphasize team spirit (patriotism) and taught to follow the leader (authoritarianism), learning the basics of war games.

Our games, sports, and entertainments are based on the concept of winners versus losers and the glorification of militarism and violence. None of this came about by chance. We are the product of conditioned response, and the Uniform Mind, we are the Borg.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hey rabblerowzer Posted by: Captainmagic
AUTHOR RESPONDS
Posted by: mkham on Nov 9, 2005 3:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're correct: that weapons depot "Worst was the Manhattan sized..." is named Al Qaqa'a (Al Ka-kah-ah), not "Al Qaeda" (not my mstake).
I was stunned by the blithe recklessness with which these vast stores of weapons were treated from the beginning- perhaps miltary families of casualties will realize how they've been betrayed.

I sent an older printable version which somehow has a mistake in a number, "176 (59%) from IED or car bomb in the last four months alone compared to only [72] from the same period in 2004". The correct number there is 77, sorry. 6 other versions have the correct number, not sure how that happened- but complicated when you're working with multiple versions in length in both Word and html for several websites.

The methodology reference of how I got the numbers is important, otherwise anyone looking at just the IED numbers on the ICCC website will come up different.

2 Includes categories “suicide car bomb”, “explosion”, “bomb”, which are also IEDs (as of 10-26). Grenade, RPG, mine, etc listed separately

See full article on my website, which has stunning pics, and longer, shorter, and printable versions.
http://hammernews.com/lootedhopes.htm

Michael Hammerschlag's commentary and articles (HAMMERNEWS.com) have appeared in Seattle Times, Providence Journal, Columbia Journalism Review, Hawaii Advertiser, Capital Times, MediaChannel; and Moscow News, Tribune, Times, and Guardian.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]