Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A Woman in Command

By Juliette Terzieff, AlterNet. Posted November 8, 2005.


In ABC's 'Commander in Chief,' Geena Davis proves that a woman in the Oval Office can be just as tough as the big boys -- but is that what the presidency is really about?
Advertisement

A month into her administration as America's first female president, Mackenzie "Mac" Allen of ABC's new hit evening drama "Commander in Chief," has already called out the military twice, out-savvied her male political rivals, and lamented that in contemporary Washington political culture one cannot even trust the backstabbers.

What the show's 16.5 million viewers every week have not seen, however, is a humble leader of the functioning republic this country is supposed to be. So yes, my fellow Americans, we do finally have a female president, and so far she's proved that a woman can be just as ruthless a chief executive as a man.

"Commander in Chief" comes at a time when a disturbing focus on dream tickets in 2008 distracts most Americans from long-neglected issues of civic apathy and accompanying decay of the republic. In the real world, "radical" political discourse centers on female contenders for the 2008 American presidential race. Geena Davis' latest incarnation is surely aimed to seize on the massive public speculation over whether we might actually see a skirt sitting in the real Oval Office.

This has led to some interesting -- if not utterly obtuse -- calls to action. Jane magazine's October edition urged that "more female stars should use their fame as an entre to politics." Jane's top pick for a presidential bid? Oprah Winfrey, "who is beloved by all and meets the requirements (US born and over 35)". Runners up included Angelina Jolie and comediennes Janeane Garafalo and Margaret Cho. "At least you'd get a laugh at their speeches," Jane proposed, "and not because they can't pronounce nuclear."

By and large, the ongoing widespread chatter has displayed a disturbing lack of discussions on issues of ideology and whether a woman might be able to effect real change in a system that has strayed disturbingly far from its representative roots.

"The first female president would likely be just as political as the men. We're living in a very polarized country held hostage by the politics of the pack, where one side fires a salvo and the other retaliates," says Caryl Rivers, professor of journalism at Boston University. "That translates into a likelihood of more of the same, not drastic differences, at least for the first female in office."

"Commander in Chief," in its premiere episode, set the scene for a season of gender-related issues.

The show's writers chose to begin "Chief's" run with vice president Mackenzie Allen, played by Geena Davis, butting heads with the male political animals around her after the Republican president dies. She then turns her newfound power to the admirable cause of rescuing a Nigerian woman about to be stoned to death for premarital sex. In another swipe at what mainstream America perceives as backward countries, Donald Sutherland's uber-sexist Speaker of the House tells Davis that Islamic countries will not respect a female leader.

The show's writers might have done their homework better. Beside Great Britain's infamous Iron Lady Margaret Thatcher and now new German Chancellor Angela Merkel the self-proclaimed developed democratic nations of the world have done pretty poorly in regards to female leaders over the last century. Meanwhile, Islamic countries like Indonesia and Pakistan have produced their fair share of tough female leaders.

Lack of female representation is a problem across the spectrum of American political offices. Although women now make 51 percent of the American population, they hold only 15 percent of Congressional seats and eight governorships, according to Rutgers University's Center for American Women and Politics. Those dismal numbers land the U.S. in 63rd place in the world in terms of female representation, well behind Rwanda, Cuba, Uganda, China and Iraq.

Outside of TV land, Hillary Rodham Clinton is the name most tossed around as a potential 2008 female presidential candidate, but there is a certain groundswell of support to draft current Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice for a run at the Oval Office.

Much of the speculation has put style before substance, even beyond the predictable ruminations on hairstyles, instrumental prowess and footwear. Seattle-Post Intelligencer reporter Melanie McFarland wrote of the presidency as an attractive life accessory rather than the duty-charged office it truly is. "In the same way Marlo Thomas and 'Mary Tyler Moore' made having financial freedom and one's own apartment into something stylish and desirable, Davis and 'Commander in Chief' could make political achievement the next must-have among women," McFarland predicted.

During "Chief's" premier a group called Americans for Dr. Rice in New Hampshire spent $8,000 for local advertising spots for a woman who has said she has no intention of contesting the 2008 race. Two books on the subject -- "The Case for Hillary Clinton" and "Condi vs. Hillary: The Next Great Presidential Race" -- hit bookshelves this month. In the latter, former Clinton strategist Dick Morris argues that Hillary Clinton is on a "virtually uncontested trajectory" to win the Democratic nomination and the presidency if Rice, the "one, and only one figure in America who can stop" Clinton, fails to run.


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Ms. Rice may be in jail by 2008
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Nov 8, 2005 1:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cabal that was incharge of lying to the public included this lady front and center. She is still doing it to congress. She was as just as bad as Chaney was with that mushroom cloud. I doubt she can even tell the truth anymore. She may be black, but she does not know that according to op-ed columnist, Eugene Robinsonof of the Washington Post.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dream on, hippie Posted by: Allison
» Yes, dearie, it really CAN be done! Posted by: fool-on-the-hill
It worries me too
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 8, 2005 4:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"What's worrying is that when it comes down to it, issues aren't always the driving force behind a candidate", argues Boston University's Professor Rivers. It comes down to whether you would rather have a beer with Bush or Kerry. Whether you like a guy who watches football or goes windsurfing. Both parties look for a candidate that they can sell. Elections are not about issues, they are about the agenda of the corporations and people who finance campaigns. Our votes only decide which candidate will do their bidding. If you want elections to involve issues, you will have to let both parties know that you don't care who they run, but which issues will get your vote. There is time to make this happen in the 2006 election. Then in 2008 we'll have more than a female candidate"s shoe size to decide our vote. Click on a new idea

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When melodrama is measured by psychodrama, the commercials win.
Posted by: Sojourner on Nov 8, 2005 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...a woman would have to prove that she's a leader and tough enough..."

I appreciate the comments in the article, but they raise more problems than they resolve.

Thank you for the distinction between leadership and tough, even while I see no evidence that we have anything approaching a consensus on what either of those concepts means, politically.

Putting Geena Davis in a script that is uploaded from the front pages no more portrays a president than the man in the white coat who tells me that his brand of liver pills are best portrays a doctor. Both fictions are closer to lies than truth, the enduring popular media issue that is tip-toed around in this article.

Psychodrama can be helpful when it allows its participants to role play alternative possibilities and thereby gain a greater sense of freedom.

Melodrama on tee vee does nothing but kill time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It maybe because its early, but I don't get the point of the article?
Posted by: Pepper on Nov 8, 2005 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, I will respond to it from a different perspective. I hope this isn't the beginning of preparing us for a woman President in 2008??? That means the promotion of Hillary is beginning early and she is neocon light! She is not "opposition" to those currently running this White House.

I don't care how much they prepare us for it, it won't work unless she changes or show us she is a different person than she has been acting out. Othewise its a waste of their money. We are on guard now and not so easily fooled. P

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh,please
Posted by: guess on Nov 8, 2005 7:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Basing an article on fictional roles in a boob tube show proves what exactly? That Americans are really so brainwashed and tv-addicted that we look to Hollywood to provide answers or even hints at what could or might be?

"This has led to some interesting -- if not utterly obtuse -- calls to action. Jane magazine's October edition urged that "more female stars should use their fame as an entre to politics.""

Yeah,exactly what America needs: another airhead from virtual reality. The Great Prevaricator,Reagan,and his equally unqualified kindred spirit,Ahnuld,should convince everyone to run like hell from the favorite flavor-of-the-month actor/actress.

Jesus Christ,we really have devolved into celebrity-worshipping insanity. Strait jackets for everyone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh,please Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Oh,please: Doubtom Posted by: Basenjis
?
Posted by: NoPCZone on Nov 8, 2005 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In ABC's 'Commander in Chief,' Geena Davis proves that a woman in the Oval Office can be just as tough as the big boys"

Since when does a TV show script prove anything? Hollywood could write a script about the first tree snail to be CinC and it wouldn't prove a thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ridiculous
Posted by: Campesino on Nov 8, 2005 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with commenters upthread - TV drama proves nothing.

Tough and capable female heads of government like Margaret Thatcher of the UK and Golda Meir of Israel PROVE that women are fully able to do the job.

I think that their examples also prove that politics is politics and believing that a female US president would govern differently than a male is naive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Woman President
Posted by: WitchyNy on Nov 8, 2005 10:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What difference does it make if the President is a woman, if she acts just like a man?

I thought the idea of Equal Rights for Women was that a womans very different perspective would have equal respect, not that we would just turn into men in skirts.

We need a word for a female Oreo.
All the professional and political women today sound just like men.

When the women's movement started promoting women in the military...that is when I stopped believing in the movement.

The original idea that started the 1960's women's movement was.... to have no more wars at all.... NOT women's equal right to die in wars.

What we need...is a leader who puts the environment first, and understands why. Who is progressive and understands that peace is patriotic. Who is not a puppet for the rich.

I don't see anybody...man or woman...who is that kind of leader. The truth is...if there was someone like that...they would just be shot- like Kenndy.

And for those who weren't around then...Kennedy WAS planning to pull us out of Viet-Nam. THAT is why he was killed.
By the real guys in power...
The REAL guys in power...we do not even know their names.
A woman president will not change that.

The issue is not man vs woman. The issue is rich vs poor.
And by the way...I am sick of this site turning into a place for over-educated people to show off their knowledge of politics.

When the article on Wild Horses (and why this is a politically important issue)...I submitted was not printed...I got the point that this is just another place for a select few...not a true progressive site. I can just imagine the MEN sittting around deciding what articles are serious and worthy.

(Just what does "Prominent" mean anyway? What ever hapened to "We are ALL leaders"?)

Ever notice how all men....pro OR against...find war so endlessly INTERESTING???

How about this.... War IS BORING....let's do something better...like QUILTING.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Woman President Posted by: dickmarshall
» RE: Woman President Posted by: daniel1982
» RE: Woman President Posted by: Doubtom
proof of what?
Posted by: ankhet on Nov 8, 2005 11:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Commander in Chief proves nothing: it's fantasy, fiction.

Drop the notion that women would or should make better wielders of absolute power. If I remember correctly, all the Second Wave demanded for women was an equal opportunity to screw up the world as badly as the men had so far. Structures have their own life, no matter which pawn occupies a given spot in them.

I think the message is more insidious - if you notice the CiC's mannish outfits, her hubby's petulant, whiny inability to find meaningful projects (he chooses baseball???), the kids' intrusions into the Oval Office, the older daughter's vicious determination to sabotage her mom's destiny (for attention???whine whine), you'll see this is just another story about a woman bringing home the bacon and frying it up, all the while not chipping her nailpolish or mussing her hair.

What real woman would want to sacrifice her own femininity by demanding power or castrate her husband in such a cruel way? He's already lost interest in sex with his wife - he'll be wearing pink undies next.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rann
Posted by: Rebecca on Nov 8, 2005 3:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, call me stupid, but I like this show. Of course it's not reality. But some of the issues mirror reality and I enjoy seeing a woman as president, even in the make believe world of TV.

I think women are stronger than men so these comments about being "tough" seem silly.

If the show gets people talking - about war/aggression, sexual stereotyping and equal rights...that's better than the usual TV, at least to me!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

After tonight's episode the plot thinkens
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Nov 8, 2005 9:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though this show does not have the class of the West Wing, it moves faster. It is more about human emotions and weaknesses. It is close enough to the real thing that I really get pissed off at the Rove type Speaker of the House. He so dark and we will really love to hate him. And who is in bed with who and why? In many ways this is lot more fun than many things on regular none cable shows for those of us who do not have cable to enjoy. Maybe sex in the White house was better for us as a nation than treason is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kiwibob
Posted by: kiwibob on Nov 8, 2005 9:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This Fall, we NEED a Woman in the White House!

Cindy for President.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wait No More, Doubtom
Posted by: gs15 on Nov 9, 2005 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It happened at a June 2005 fundraiser to retire a presidental campaign debt. Ed Gordon's June 28 NPR show focused quite a bit of attention to it (as virtually no one else did [the so-called Progressive only gave it a minor paragraph]---can't report no bad news about the Shining White Knight can we!) I'd 've given out some links if Alternet hadn't kept blue-penciling them out---guess the above applies to them too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What ARE their qualifications.
Posted by: Edward George on Nov 11, 2005 2:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Their sex is neither a qualifier nor a disqualifier and rather than all this stuff about their sex I would very much like to see a descriptive list of their qualifications. Exactly what have they done that makes them qualified to BE a president, not just BECOME a president?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]